Asbarez: L.A. County Sheriff Luna Visits Western Prelate

Sheriff Robert Luna meets with Western Prelate Archbishop Kegham Khacherian on May 8


Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna on Friday paid a courtesy visit to Western Prelate Archbishop Kegham Kacherian.

Sheriff Luna was accompanied by his staff and security personnel, while Western Prelacy Executive Council members Jack Hadinjian and Ronnie Gharibian also attended the meeting.

Luna, who commands the nation’s largest sheriff department, to the Prelate that the purpose of his visit was to become better acquainted with Archbishop Khacherian. He praised the spiritual and community-centered mission of the Western Prelacy and congratulated Archbishop Khacherian on his election as Prelate of the Western Prelacy, extending his heartfelt best wishes.

Archbishop Khacherian, in turn, shared his appreciation for the Sheriff’s visit and highly commended the important public safety mission and community service carried out by the department for the well-being and safety of the residents of Los Angeles County. The Prelate also expressed his strong commitment to cooperating and collaborating with the Sheriff’s Department.

At the conclusion of the meeting, Archbishop Khacherian conveyed his support for the initiatives and programs of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and wished Sheriff Luna and his team continued success in their mission. The Prelate then offered blessings to Sheriff Luna and his delegation.

CC: What six months in Armenia revealed to this photography duo


California Courier Online, May 11, 2026

California
Courier Online, May 11, 2026

1- Cong. Fine Should be Kicked Out of Congress

For his Anti-Armenian Racist Remarks
By Harut
Sassounian

2- Armenia And The Disappearing Mountain
3- My speech at the Diaspora Mobilization Conference in Paris, April 11-12, 2026
4- Pashinyan announces legal action against Samvel Karapetyan over psychedelic mushroom claims
5- Most popular baby names revealed in Armenia
6- Washington summit opened new chapter in Azerbaijan – U.S. partnership
7- Now is the time for a US ‘grand deal’ with Azerbaijan

******************************************************************************************************************

1- Cong. Fine Should be Kicked Out of Congress

For his Anti-Armenian Racist Remarks

By Harut Sassounian
www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

Randy Fine, a Jewish-American Republican Congressman from Florida, made a highly insulting remark by telling the audience on a nationwide podcast — the Jenny Beth Show — on April 30, “We don’t want Armenians to be able to serve in Congress.”

Cong. Fine made this controversial comment while criticizing Dan Bilzerian, a social media influencer with 29.6 million Instagram followers and a U.S. veteran, who is running against him in the Republican Primary in Florida. Pres. Trump has endorsed Fine, calling him a “MAGA Warrior.”

Fine said that Bilzerian “lives in Las Vegas when he’s not in his foreign country of Armenia. But you know, he’s just a terrible anti-Semite. I think what he’s trying to show is that this group of hate-filled lunatics and losers can take hold in the Republican Party…. The little Armenian said, I think that President Trump was a pedophile rapist who should be impeached. That’s not a winning argument. It may work in Armenia, where he’s from, but that’s not an argument. That’s not gonna work in the United States. So, it’s bad. We have to take it seriously because we don’t want this to take root in our party. We don’t want Armenians to be able to serve in Congress. But I’m not gonna lose too much sleep about it.” Bilzerian is not from Armenia. He was born in Tampa, Florida, and became a dual citizen of Armenia in 2018.

If Cong. Fine had simply criticized Bilzerian because he did not like his controversial views, that would have been understandable. However, targeting all Armenians because of his disagreement with one Armenian-American is completely unacceptable and foolish. This is pure and simple racism. Fine was rebuked by several members of Congress, including Cong. Brad Sherman (Democrat-CA), Cong. Laura Friedman (Democrat-Ca), Cong. Brendan Boyle (Democrat-PA), and Cong. Delia Ramirez (Democrat-Illinois). Fine was also criticized by several members of the U.S. media, and online commentators.

“This isn’t just racist — it’s disqualifying,” stated ANCA National Grassroots Director Gev Iskajyan. “Saying Armenians shouldn’t be allowed to serve in Congress is blatant bigotry. No elected official who traffics in this kind of hate should be running for office.”

Rather than apologizing for his unsavory remarks, Fine doubled down on his insults by posting on X two days later: “Armenians should not serve in Congress. Neither should Somalis. Or Guatemalans. Or — wait for it — Israelis.” He made matters worse by adding several other nationalities to his racist remarks.

How would Jewish Cong. Fine feel if someone says: “We don’t want Jews to be able to serve in Congress?” I am sure all hell would break loose. There would be nationwide condemnation of that person for being blatantly anti-Semitic. And if such a racist thing was said by an incumbent member of Congress, there would have been calls for his immediate resignation. The least Congress should do now is strip Fine of his membership on the prestigious House Foreign Affairs Committee.

I disagree with a lot of the controversial things Bilzerian says about Jews, such as calling Cong. Fine “a fat Jew.” The Israeli government has ranked Bilzerian number one on its list of the 10 most prominent anti-Semitic influencers.”

Cong. Fine himself “has a long history of making bigoted comments about Muslims, and suggested in 2025 that nuclear weapons should be dropped on Gaza. He has also used racist and Islamophobic language toward Muslim politicians in the U.S., such as New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, whom he called ‘little more than a Muslim terrorist’, adding that his citizenship should be stripped and he ‘should be deported to the Ugandan shithole he came from,’” Nate Ostiller reported in OC Media.

Fine introduced last October the “Disqualifying Dual Loyalty Act” (H.R. 5817), but Congress has not taken any action on his proposal. Serving as a dual citizen in the U.S. Congress is not against the law and cannot be an excuse for making racist comments about such individuals.

Over the years, many dual citizens have served in Congress, such as Sen. Ted Cruz who held joint U.S. and Canadian citizenship until 2014, and Congresswoman Michele Bachman who held joint U.S. and Swiss citizenship until 2012.

There are several other serious problems with Cong. Fine. Along with  five other members of Congress, Fine is a cosponsor of H.R.6534, introduced by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), in the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Dec. 9, 2025. If adopted, H. R. 6534 would repeal Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support Act and lift longstanding restrictions on U.S. assistance to Azerbaijan, including providing military weapons.

Doing further research using the recently formed website GovItUp.com, I discovered that Ezra Friedlander, the principal of the Friedlander Consulting Group, a lobbying firm hired by Azerbaijan, donated $1,000 to Cong. Fine’s campaign on Sept. 18, 2025. In addition, the Friedlander firm reported to the U.S. Department of Justice that it had arranged two meetings in June and July 2025, for Nigar Shiralizade, Political Officer at Azerbaijan’s Embassy, and Sanan Farajov, Second Secretary of Azerbaijan’s Embassy, with Cong. Fine’s Chief of Staff, to discuss “U.S.-Azerbaijan relations.”

As the _expression_ goes, “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones at other houses.”

****************************************************************************************************************

2- Armenia And The Disappearing Mountain
RFE
Something seems to be missing from Armenias new biometric passport. That’s according to many in the country, who have flagged an unusual image in the document.

Among pages showcasing Armenia’s heritage and culture is a picture of Khor Virap. The 17th century monastery is famous largely for its spectacular backdrop of Mount Ararat. In the passport, however, the monastery is depicted from an angle showing only nondescript mountains on the horizon. Critics have called the unusual image a ploy to avoid including Ararat in the official document.

Mount Ararat is situated inside Turkey and officially known by its Turkish name Mount Agri, but the landmark rises prominently above Yerevan on clear days.

The 5,100 meter mountain was a part of ancient kingdoms of Armenia, but ethnic Armenians were driven from settlements around Ararat amid the Ottoman state-led killings, which have been recognized as genocide by dozens of countries including the United States. When borders in the region were redrawn following World War I, Ararat’s twin peaks were included within the eastern edge of modern Turkey.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian recently hinted at the controversy over the passport depiction of Khor Virap,saying during a live stream with Interior Minister Arpine Sargsian that, we’ve chosen such a perspective to suit our policies and what we have discussed for a long time.

Given it is the passport of the Republic of Armenia, Pashinian added, the passport reflects the territory of the Republic of Armenia.

The absence of the mountain in the passports, which are set to be rolled out in the fall of 2026, follows a government decision late last year to remove snow-capped icons of Mount Ararat from passport stamps. That decision led to an uproar in the country, including a lawsuit filed against the government.

Opposition politician Hayk Mamijanian condemned the removal of the mountain from passport stamps at the time, telling reporters it never ceases to amaze how zealously Pashinian is ready to please Turkey or Azerbaijan.”

Since Azerbaijan’s military recapture of the Nagorno-Karabakh region in 2023, Armenia has sought to normalize relations with neighboring Azerbaijan and Turkey, both historic foes of Armenia.

Armenia and Azerbaijan initialled a peace agreement in 2025 that includes a clause indefinitely forbidding either country from making territorial claims on the other. Turkey, a close ally of Baku, has long objected to Armenia’s use of Ararat as a national symbol, including in the coat of arms of the Soviet Republic of Armenia.

Joshua Kucera, a senior analyst for International Crisis Group, says the Khor Virap image appears to be, part of the larger real Armenia narrative that [Pashinian] is promoting, trying to refocus Armenians’ attentions to the issues within their own borders rather than historical Armenia outside its borders.

The Caucasus expert says that reframing effort also includes the recaptured Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan.

Some fear a more consequential target for the Pashinian government could be the current Armenian coat of arms, which features Ararat as its centerpiece, topped with Noah’s Ark. The mythical vessel is believed by some Christians to have settled atop Mount Ararat following the biblical flood. In 2023, Pashinian criticized the emblem for representing “a dichotomy between historical Armenia and real Armenia.

Edmon Marukian, a politician and former ally of the Armenian prime minister, called the 2025 erasure of Mount Ararat from passport stamps a potential precursor to Armenias coat of arms being remade. Removing [Ararat] would require changing the constitution and the law, the politician noted, adding, are we, as citizens, ready to tolerate this?

In April, RFE/RL’s Armenian Service asked Pashinian about the potential for Ararat to be removed from the coat of arms. The prime minister responded only that “I am not raising such a question.”

********************************************************************************************************************

3- My speech at the Diaspora Mobilization Conference in Paris, April 11-12, 2026
By Harut Sassounian

Diaspora Armenians often proudly say, “Azerbaijan has oil, Georgia has a sea, and Armenia has a Diaspora.”
Unfortunately, until now, the potential of the Diaspora has not been fully utilized. Many measure the support of the Diaspora only in material terms, and for this reason some call the Diaspora a “cash cow.”
In 1997, the Armenian government approved the law on dual citizenship, an important step towards strengthening Diaspora-Armenia relations. Unfortunately, the government did not encourage Diaspora Armenians to become dual citizens of Armenia.
In 2008, President Serzh Sargsyan established the Ministry of Diaspora. I proudly served on the Board of the Ministry for ten years, from the day it was established until its closure in 2018.
When Nikol Pashinyan came to power, he closed the Ministry of Diaspora and appointed Zareh Sinanyan as High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs. This was a hugely unsuccessful appointment, as Sinanyan destroyed the existing bridges between Armenia and the Diaspora.
Sinanyan ignored traditional Armenian organizations and parties and replaced them with individuals who have no influence in their communities but are supporters of Pashinyan.
Sinanyan wastes his time praising the Prime Minister and even suggesting that Arabs immigrate to Armenia, something that has nothing to do with Diaspora Armenians.
At the 2024 Diaspora-Armenia conference, Pashinyan surprisingly dared to tell the present Diaspora Armenians: “We do not need your humanitarian aid.”
These words caused deep offense, because he not only does not encourage the Diaspora, but also openly refuses their support.
During his eight years in office, Pashinyan has become a great disaster for Diaspora-Armenia relations.
He said in Istanbul that the Prime Minister of Armenia is not responsible for all Armenians around the world. “Don’t rely on me. Diaspora Armenians should solve their problems in their communities.”
And this week, Pashinyan declared, “There are some offices, groups, clubs in the Diaspora who claim to speak on behalf of the Diaspora. These people are not the Diaspora at all, they are no longer the overwhelming majority in the Diaspora, they are marginal organizations. And the Armenian government will have less to do with these organizations in general and will ultimately have nothing to do with them at all.” This approach completely undermines pan-Armenian unity.
In addition, Pashinyan has taken steps that belittle our national sanctities:
— Criticized Mount Ararat because it is outside the borders of Armenia.
— Criticized the lion on the coat of arms, not understanding that the lion is a symbol of courage.
— Criticized the national anthem.
— Gave up Artsakh, despite his 2018 statement that “Artsakh is Armenia and that’s it.”
— Ceded more than 200 sq. km. of Armenian territory to Azerbaijan.
— Did nothing to release the Artsakh leaders imprisoned in Baku.
— Considers the Artsakh issue closed and calls Artsakh Armenians “escapees.”
— Harshly criticizes the Armenian Apostolic Church and imprisons its clergy.
— Questions the veracity of the Armenian Genocide.
— Renames “Armenian History” textbooks “History of Armenia.”
— During his visits, he carries a map of “real Armenia” on his lapel, consigning historical Armenia to oblivion.
— Has compiled a blacklist for Diaspora Armenians who are banned from entering Armenia. My name is on that list. Armenia is not Pashinyan’s personal home to decide who can enter Armenia and who cannot.
Last week, Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party announced a new program to further divide the Diaspora. I quote: “Organize a conference of state-centered organizations of the Diaspora with the aim of adopting a concept of Armenia-Diaspora cooperation in peace and forming mechanisms for its implementation.”
With such steps, Pashinyan is concealing our national identity, history, and millennial heritage. The concessions he has made violate the laws and constitution of Armenia.
If Pashinyan remains at the head of government after the June 7 elections, the very existence of Armenia will be endangered.
Finally, I would like to present my proposal to unite the Diaspora in one sentence: “With the vision of uniting millions of our people in the Diaspora into one unified structure, I am trying to create a Diaspora Armenian Parliament with representatives elected by Diaspora Armenians.”

****************************************************************************************************************

******************************************************************************************************************

5- Most popular baby names revealed in Armenia

Panarmenian.net

Armenia’s Statistical Committee has published the list of the most frequently given names to newborns in 2025, topped by Nare for girls and Davit for boys.

The top ten female names also include Arpi, Luse, Maria, Angelina, Eva, Mane, Ameli, Mari, and Mariam.

The top ten male names also include Narek, Hayk, Robert, Mikael, Tigran, Mark, Areg, Leo, and Monte.

In 2025, a total of 15,246 girls and 16,796 boys were born in Armenia.

****************************************************************************************************************

6- Washington Summit Opened New Chapter in Azerbaijan-U.S. Partnership


By Alyona Pavlenko
30 Trend

LACHIN, Azerbaijan — A new momentum for cooperation has
emerged in the relations between Azerbaijan and the United States following the
Washington summit, Amy Carlon, U.S. Chargé d’Affaires in Azerbaijan, told
journalists on Saturday during a visit to East Zangezur and Karabakh, Trend
reports.

“I am very glad to have the opportunity to come to
this part of Azerbaijan. I have never been to Shusha or Lachin before, so I am
truly happy to be here and see the situation with my own eyes,” she said.

Carlon noted that since last year’s Washington summit, a
new impetus has been injected into the bilateral relationship. “Our focus
is on issues of connectivity, trade and economic development, as well as
cooperation in the fields of defense and security. Since the signing of the
agreement [Charter on Strategic Partnership], we have been engaging technical
specialists and other experts to implement concrete projects and advance this
cooperation in practice,” she added.

The visit of representatives of the diplomatic corps
accredited in Azerbaijan to East Zangezur and Karabakh commenced on May 1,
2026. The delegation is accompanied by Hikmet Hajiyev, Assistant to the
President of the Republic of Azerbaijan and Head of the Foreign Policy Affairs
Department of the Presidential Administration. More than 150 ambassadors,
diplomats, military attaches, and other representatives from 62 countries and
international organizations are participating in the trip.

This marks the 21st visit of the diplomatic corps to the
liberated territories. Such trips are of significant importance for forming an
objective understanding of the scale of projects being implemented and the
results achieved in the region. On the second day of the visit, the diplomatic
representatives visited the Lachin district.

******************************************************************************************************

7- Now is the time for a US ‘grand deal’ with Azerbaijan

By Andrew D’Anieri and Mercedes Sapuppo
Atlantic Council

Bottom lines up front

  • The Trump administration should propose a “grand deal” with Azerbaijan that lifts US arms sale restrictions in exchange for Baku releasing dozens of political prisoners.
  • This effort would build on the model the White House has used in talks with Belarus, which has released more than five hundred political prisoners.
  • Shifting US relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan, upcoming Armenian elections, and the need for a final peace agreement could make such a deal more likely to succeed.

WASHINGTON—The Trump administration’s dealmaking blitz with Belarus has secured the release of hundreds of detainees. By trading targeted sanctions relief for the release of political prisoners in Belarus, the White House has helped free more than five hundred people from unjust captivity. A similar deal with Azerbaijan in the South Caucasus would produce major rewards, with much less risk.

To pursue this “grand deal” in Azerbaijan, the Trump administration should work with Congress to propose ending a ban on arms sales to Baku in exchange for the release of unjustly detained individuals—some with US ties—sitting in the country’s jails. This is a rare moment for a bipartisan win-win and a relatively cost-free way to upgrade US relations with a key strategic energy and transport partner that borders both Iran and Russia. With proper timing, Armenia, too, could be supportive, if the release includes at least some Armenians currently held in Azerbaijan. 

What to do with Section 907

The Trump administration should engage Congress to resolve Baku’s number one concern on Capitol Hill: the repeal of Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support Act that bans US arms sales to Azerbaijan. Congress originally adopted the measure in 1992 to punish Azerbaijan’s treatment of Armenians in Karabakh and its blockade of Armenia. In 2001, the US Senate passed an amendment that allowed the White House to waive Section 907 restrictions. Almost every year since, both Republican and Democratic presidents have indeed waived Section 907. This renders the text inconsequential to the United States, but it is highly symbolic to Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s government, which views it as an impediment to closer relations with Washington.

Furthermore, the relationships between Washington, Baku, and Yerevan are changing. Armenia and Azerbaijan received unprecedented US attention when Vice President JD Vance became the highest-level US official to visit the countries in February, following the tripartite leader-level summit in Washington, DC in August 2025. In Yerevan, the vice president announced billions of dollars in nuclear energy support, talked up a major US-funded supercomputing project, and slipped in a tacit endorsement of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. Vance’s Baku visit saw an agreement for the United States to work with Azerbaijan in a range of areas, but no concrete agreement.

The timing of any deal is essential, and the next few months represent a unique opportunity. Armenia holds parliamentary elections on June 7, and Pashinyan may face a strong test in his reelection bid from pro-Russia parties skeptical of his efforts toward peace with Azerbaijan. The Kremlin is conducting an extensive fake news operation to undermine Pashinyan’s campaign. Officials and experts in Baku rightly see Pashinyan as their best chance to finally agree to a formal peace deal and may be inclined to furtively support his candidacy. What better way to defang Pashinyan’s pro-Russia detractors and maintain pathways to peace than to release high-profile Armenian prisoners ahead of the election? 

Additionally, Azerbaijan has found more support on the Republican side of the aisle in the United States and may want to move on the issue now while Congress is in GOP hands.  

That’s also why, with US midterm elections just six months away, the Trump administration may find it advantageous to push forward, as unified Republican control potentially makes it easier for the Trump administration to work with Congress to repeal Section 907. While passing any legislation is a difficult task on gridlocked Capitol Hill, Azerbaijan could offer something in exchange that both parties and the White House would value highly: the release of prisoners that officials, senators, and experts all consider unjustly detained. This group should include anti-corruption advocate Gubad Ibadoghlu, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America journalists, and some Armenian detainees. The impact of freeing unjustly detained people would be far more valuable to the United States than maintaining a statute that is rendered moot almost every year. 

Such a trade would present fewer potential downsides to US interests than recent engagement with Belarus. US Special Envoy for Belarus John Coale has pursued a blunt sanctions-relief-for-prisoner-releases policy, a high-risk game that some worry could make it easier for Russia to evade US export controls and sanctions. Those fears haven’t yet been borne out, but with Belarusian dictator Alyaksandr Lukashenka still beholden to his Kremlin patron and aiding Moscow’s aggression, the United States risks undermining its own efforts to limit Russia’s ability to continue its war on Ukraine.

The stakes in Azerbaijan are thankfully much lower. The United States would not be dropping sanctions, merely giving itself the option to continue to provide security assistance to Baku. US military aid today is negligible: Since 2002, the United States has delivered approximately eighty million dollars’ worth of defense assistance to Azerbaijan in total. Vance did promise new aid on his February visit: an unspecified number of maritime patrol boats to better secure the country’s ports. These are tiny amounts of nonlethal security assistance made possible because the United States waives Section 907 every year. 

That figure could increase if Section 907 were repealed and Washington and Baku began arranging multiyear security assistance packages. Even so, that aid would likely still focus on nonlethal border security. Azerbaijan already acquires offensive capabilities from Turkey and Israel, at lower prices than US firms and stocks can offer. With Iran and Russia’s restive southern regions persistently unstable, Azerbaijan needs early-warning and border security capabilities more than it needs lethal capabilities.

The only thing the United States stands to lose by repealing Section 907 is leverage. US President Donald Trump can use that leverage by building on his administration’s success in freeing political prisoners in Belarus to simultaneously promote peace in the South Caucasus. Aliyev may even be more open to dealing than Lukashenka has been. Compared to Belarus, whose pro-democracy movement currently functions in exile but remains a powerful diplomatic force, the Azerbaijani government faces a much more muted opposition and could release detainees without fearing any real threat to its authority.

How to sequence the agreement

The full “grand deal” should therefore be structured as follows. In the run-up to the Armenian parliamentary election in June, Azerbaijan should free some of the Armenians it captured in 2023 in Karabakh as a gesture of good faith toward a deal. Washington and Baku then would work to agree to repeal Section 907 in exchange for the release of Azerbaijani detainees and additional Armenian prisoners. This would require the White House to work with Congress to secure the repeal ahead of the planned release, but with renewed faith in Azerbaijan’s seriousness about the deal. 

This proposed deal has something for everyone. Baku gets a two-for-one: It retains a true partner for peace negotiations in Pashinyan and resolves its main issue in front of the United States. Team Trump gets to free unjust detainees and bolster the president’s peacemaking image at essentially no cost. Congressional Republicans get the president a foreign policy win, while Democrats can tout their role in notching a rare human rights victory; both mollify the ever-active Armenian diaspora by securing the release of Karabakh Armenians. Yerevan gets citizens back and a steadier track toward normalization with its neighbors. This arrangement must include a clear warning to Baku that the benefits it receives are contingent on maintaining the hard-won peace.

Azerbaijan and Armenia have made major progress in the last several months to normalize relations, most recently boosting energy trade ties and agreeing to joint border demarcation. With some more nudging from the United States, Baku and Yerevan can take another step toward a final peace deal by freeing detainees. Crucially, all parties get to come out with a foreign policy win at almost no cost.

This plan would test the White House’s dealmaking diplomacy and Congress’s legislative creativity. But with so many potential benefits on offer in a short window of time, it’s worth exploring.

************************************************************************************************************

If you wish
to read daily updated Armenian news and commentary,

Please send
me your email address: [email protected]

Website:
TheCaliforniaCourier.com

************************************************************************************************************

Washington summit opened new chapter in Azerbaijan – U.S. partnership


A new patriarch was elected in Georgia

May 112026

Metropolitan Shio (Mujiri) of Senak and Chkhorotsghu, who is currently the deputy of the patriarchal chair, was elected the new patriarch of Georgia. This was announced by Metropolitan Anania after the vote held in the expanded assembly of the Georgian Orthodox Church.

“Vicar Shio received 22 votes, Metropolitan Iov – 9, and Metropolitan Grigol – 7 votes. One ballot was declared invalid. Metropolitan Shio has been elected as the Patriarch of Georgia,” said Metropolitan Anania.

About 420 million drams: 1 million 135,000 dollars, to “Domino Video Production” – expected

May 112026

During one of the regular briefings, Nikol Pashinyan announced that on May 28, on the occasion of the Republic Day, an exhibition of the military equipment acquired in recent years will take place in Yerevan’s Republic Square, then he justified himself that it would be a report, because the “military parade” is a delicate phenomenon and can create the impression of deviating from the peace agenda.

“We are working on this issue with our international partners. The military parade is a very delicate phenomenon and can also create the impression of a deviation from the peace agenda, a rejection of the peace agenda, and we are working and will continue to work with our partners in the international community, including the countries of the region, so that they do not perceive it as a rejection of the peace agenda in any way,” he explained.

It turns out that the duty to compile this “report” was placed on “Domino Video Production” LLC, and that is urgently, by organizing the purchase without a tender.

Thus, firstly, according to the agreement signed on April 27, and also according to the agreement signed on May 8, this LLC will provide event organization services on May 28 for around 420 million drams (419,638,800 drams, $1,135,135.135).

Read also

  • Aliyev indirectly mentioned the reason for the defeat of the Armenian side in the 2020 war
  • EXCLUDED. I WILL NOT JOIN PASHINIAN IN ANY CASE. GAGIK TSARUKIAN
  • #ՀԻՄԱ. Ի՞նչ է կատարվում Մասյացոտնի թեմի շուրջ. Արա Զոհրաբյանի և Ռուբեն վարդապետի ասուլիսը. #ՈՒՂԻՂ

A few excerpts from the specification: “The event is planned to be held in the Republic Square of Yerevan as a large-scale outdoor solemn event, including a stage performance, a military parade and artistic performances.

The purpose of the event is to hold a large-scale and solemn military parade equipped with high-quality, modern technical and artistic solutions. The event will be filmed and broadcast by the Public Television Company.

When developing the general concept, it is necessary to take into account the thematic features and title of the event. Content description of the event, the concept of the event must include symbols of the state. The structure and design of the overall stage must correspond to the concept and sketch of the event.

It is planned to use special effects during the event: daytime tricolor fireworks. It is planned to place 5 red, 5 blue and 5 orange fireworks on each of the roofs of the 5 buildings of the Republic Square – a total of 15 for each roof, the total number – 75.

It is planned to prepare and install a large inscription “Republic Day”, preparation of a relief decor of the RA map, preparation of a relief decor of the RA coat of arms.

More about Matrimonial Domino

“Domino Production” LLC, to which 168amthe referred to back in September 2021, when the “colorful” event dedicated to the Independence Day, in the Pashinian formulation, became a reality in a country mourning the many protest events of the relatives of those killed, captured and missing in the war, belongs to Ruzanna Vardanyan.

100 percent of Domino Video Production belongs to Ruzanna’s husband, Ashot Arakelyan.

In general, LLCs owned by spouses, according to the e-procurement system, were distinguished by 7 large purchases, 5 of which were made without a tender, one with a quotation request procedure, which again does not involve a tender, and only one with an open tender. including:

In October 2025, Yerevan Municipality delegated the organization of an event within the framework of the “Erebuni-Yerevan” celebration with 34,800,000 million.

In September 2025, the Ministry of Health delegated the branding service of the Comprehensive Health Insurance Fund for 32 million 760,000 drams.

RA Ministry of High-tech Industry: in one case: 4 million 800,000 drams for representation expenses, in another case: 1 million 200,000 drams for advertising services,

The Prime Minister’s staff also allocated 130,569,600 drams for the “Hero of Our Times” event in July 2025.

By the way, Nikol Pashinyan and his teammate, Minister of Defense Suren Papikyan, published footage from the event planned for May 28 on their social media pages, and although Pashinyan stressed in March that the planned event is not a classic military parade, but a unique “report” to the citizens of Armenia, he used the word “military parade” when describing the video published today. “Rehearsal of the May 28 military parade”.

Let’s add: still in 2019 168.am– asked Ashot Arakelyan in a written request: how much money has the government allocated for the intermission dedicated to the 30th anniversary of RA independence? Is the information confirmed that 1 billion drams will be allocated from the state budget? The pre-election campaign videos of the “Civil Contract” party and, in particular, the campaign video with the participation of Nikol Pashinyan, is the company led by him carrying out the RA on its own initiative? the filming of the anthem’s new video, and what are the reactions to the assurances that Artsakh footage is removed from the new video.

We had not received the answers.

With a phone call after the survey From the head of the Domino Production organization once again we wondered what expenses were incurred for the “colorful” show. Our questions, however, irritated him, and he urged us not to call his number again.

He dismissed reports that 10 minutes of drone rental cost $110,000 as a lie, but also did not provide the actual figure. In general, our questions about the costs of the event remained unanswered.

Let’s remind that the RA government did not announce a competition for the organization of this event either.

You are lucky. you look at Ararat and St. Etchmiadzin every day. Samvel

May 112026

You are sure that we will win, so the sooner we know your problems, the sooner we will think about them and find solutions. Samvel Karapetyan, the leader of the “Strong Armenia” bloc, said this at a meeting with the residents of Ararat and Armavir marzes.

“You are the happiest people in the world, because you stand the closest, you look at Mount Ararat every day, you are the closest to our Saint Etchmiadzin, so you are really lucky, but you are not lucky that no one thought about you for so long,” he said.

At the meeting, residents presented the problems of their villages and received answers with clear solutions.

It is excluded. I will not join Pashinyan under any circumstances. Gagik Tsarukyan

May 112026

Gagik Tsarukyan ruled out the possibility of forming a coalition with Nikol Pashinyan. During a short conversation with journalists during the campaign, the PAP leader was asked: if it turns out that the opposition forces do not form a majority to form the government, and Nikol Pashinyan needs your votes, will you join Nikol Pashinyan?

“No,” he answered.

Do you rule out cooperation with Nikol Pashinyan? Gagik Tsarukyan responded to the clarifying question: “I rule out.”

Aliyev indirectly mentioned the defeat of the Armenian side in the 2020 war

May 112026

On May 10, the President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, visited the occupied city of Kovsakan (Zangelan) and met with resettled families.

Aliyev considered it necessary to emphasize that the occupied Kovsakan or, in his words, Zangelan, is located in the transport corridor, so it will become a transport center for Azerbaijan and the entire region.

“A railway is being built. In the near future, in one to one and a half years, it will be possible to reach Zangela from Baku by rail, as today they travel on the Aghdam railway line. Next year it will be possible to reach Stepanakert by rail. And this railway will have its continuation, and it will connect Nakhichevan to “Zangezur Corridor”. Actually, the journey from here to Nakhichevan will take 30 minutes. We will geographically connect Nakhichevan with the main part of Azerbaijan.

Read also

  • Putin goes to open ultimatums. Why now?
  • EXCLUDED. I WILL NOT JOIN PASHINIAN IN ANY CASE. GAGIK TSARUKIAN
  • Approximately 420 million drams, 1 million 135,000 dollars, to “Domino Video Production” for the expected “military parade-report”. contract without tender

At the same time, on our initiative, the construction of a bridge on the border of Iran is almost finished, and now the construction of border-customs infrastructures and buildings is underway. Probably, in a few months they will also be ready for operation, and it will become an international transport corridor. Both railways and roads passing through here will be of great benefit because people will be provided with jobs there. And this will be a huge investment in the economy of Zangelan and, in general, Azerbaijan.

After the opening of the border with Armenia, the “Zangezur Corridor”, Zangelan will actually become the only region of our country that will have a border checkpoint with two neighboring countries. See how important it is. Because it is simultaneously both the East-West corridor, a road that stretches from Nakhijevan through Turkey to Europe, and the North-South corridor, from Zangelan through Aghbend to Iran and the Persian Gulf, and from here through Nakhijevan and Julfa, back to the Persian Gulf. Thus, Zangelan will become an irreplaceable international center. This is how we see it, and this is exactly how it will be, because all our plans have come to life so far.”

In other words, during the 44-day war, the capture of Kovsakan, on which day? is noted October 20, 2020, was also of strategic and political significance for Aliyev.

It should be noted that in the 44-day war of 2020, the rapid reaction forces of the State Border Guard Service of Azerbaijan also took part in the operations to capture Jrakan (Jebrayil), Varanda (Fizuli), Zangelan (Kovsakan).

On one occasion we wrote also that the unit of the Foreign Intelligence Service of Azerbaijan (“Yarasa”) also participated in the 2020 war. During the 44-day military operations, “Yarasa” personnel operated in the rear of the Armenian army and participated in the capture of settlements, particularly in the Kubatli (Orotan) sector.

Moreover, the capture of Kovsakan was preceded by the ceasefire of October 18, 2020, in fact, at the mediation of the French side and President Macron, which was also not observed.

About this in June 2023 in the investigative committee it was details to report Nikol Pashinyan, noting:

«On October 17, French President Emmanuel Macron took the initiative and informed me that the President of Azerbaijan agrees to establish a ceasefire without preconditions from midnight on October 18. I naturally agreed to it. after which, within a few hours, the following statement was agreed between France, Armenia and Azerbaijan, which was published late in the evening of October 17. “The Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan decided to establish a humanitarian ceasefire on October 18, at 00:00 local time.

Regarding this announcement, even before publication, we had consultations with our Russian partners, who welcomed the initiative.

Contrary to the announcement, however, no ceasefire was established on October 18 either, despite the fact that throughout the day we made all possible diplomatic efforts to stop the war. In other words, after this announcement, there was no pause at all.”

Then Pashinyan continued during his questioning at the investigative commission.

“With the failure of another cease-fire announcement, I returned to the conversation I had with the President of the Russian Federation on October 16. On the afternoon of October 19, I had a telephone conversation with Vladimir Putin, where he reaffirmed that it is still possible to try to stop the war under the conditions of the Russian plan developed years ago. And the condition is as follows: the 7 regions are returned in the 5 2 format, the issue of connection between Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia through the Lachin Corridor is resolved, Russian peacekeepers are stationed in Karabakh, the status of Karabakh remains undefined, and the issue remains uncertain for the future…

In the evening, I called and told the Russian president that I am ready to stop the war under such conditions. The President of Russia said that he would talk to the President of Azerbaijan and call me. At that time, two of the 5 regions in question, Fizuli and Jebrail, were practically completely or mostly under the control of Azerbaijan.

The Russian president called the next day, on the morning of October 20. And, in fact, conveyed the following. Azerbaijan is ready to stop the war, but expects to get all 7 regions in return, or rather the remaining 5 regions, because two of them, Fizuli and Jebrayil, as I said, were already under their control. But this was not all.

It was on this day that the most discussed and criticized episode after November 9, 2020 appeared, that there was an opportunity to stop the war while Shushi remained under Armenian control, but I missed it.”

As a result, the RA authorities do not keep Shush, the “disputed” regions go to Azerbaijan, and Kelbajar, Aghdam, Lachin are surrendered according to the November 9 document, the army kept them. In other words, before the war, Pashinyan refuses to hand over the 5 regions so that they don’t say he is a traitor, and in the context of the war, Azerbaijan gets more, even what the army was able to keep.

Let us add that Kovsakan was liberated in the fall of 1993. On November 1, 1993, the Armenian armed forces established final control over the Zangelan regional center and surrounding settlements, which were included in the Azerbaijani SSR, and thus completed the completion of the southern and southeastern borders of Artsakh and Syunik.

And after the 44-day war, in 2022, Aliyev and Erdogan were officially the international airport in the occupied Kovskakan. to open 

By the way, months ago we wrote that Aliyev approved the changes in the law “On Expropriation of Land for State Needs”.

According to the approved amendments, the expansion of state-owned airports and aerodromes, as well as the construction of new airports and aerodromes, have been added to the list of state needs for which land expropriation can be carried out.

Naturally, Aliyev’s decision regarding airports and ports has an important component of the “big game” of transport and logistics.

Let’s go back to Aliyev’s visit to occupied Kovsa. He hinted that it was not advisable to continue the 44-day war after taking Shushi.

«Stopping the war allowed us to get back the regions of Kelbajar, Lachin and Aghdam without bloodshed, by political means, in fact, by ultimatum. And the ultimatum was this: Armenia must withdraw its troops from those territories in a short time, within 1 month, otherwise they will be destroyed.” the leader of Azerbaijan emphasized.

And this is when on other occasions the same Aliyev admitted that one of the main reasons for stopping the 44-day war was to avoid large casualties, because if the 44-day war is extended, the districts of Kelbajar, Karvachar and Lachin, Kashatagh in winter weather conditions it was going to be very difficult to capture especially Karvacharin.

And how the Armenian side succeeded in liberating these territories, as well as Shush, during the first Artsakh war, which no get around during the “trial” in Baku, which has already ended, Aliyev justified the treacherous actions of the Azerbaijani authorities during the first war in occupied Kovsakan.

“In 1993, not only our territorial integrity was threatened, but also our independence. The people in charge at that time were leading the country to destruction. The Armenians’ “occupation” of our lands, Shushi, Lachin and Kelbajar (quotes: M.P.), internal divisions, arbitrariness, anarchy, as well as the civil war situation as a result of the provocative and treacherous actions of the authorities at that time, had practically brought the independent Azerbaijani state to the brink of collapse,” Aliyev insisted and continued.

«During the first war, the people leading our army not only did not know what military work is, but also their treacherous actions led to the “occupation of our lands” (quotes: M.P.).

The coward and the traitor who said “if Shushi is lost, I will shoot myself in the forehead” is still wandering somewhere (referring to the former Minister of Defense Rahim Ghaziyev).

In other words, our misfortune at that time was that such people held key positions in Azerbaijan. People without knowledge, ability and work experience, who literally came from the street or were brought, were assigned to the first, second, third and fourth positions. Our army was actually in the hands of criminals.”

Yes, during the first Artsakh war, the Armenian forces carried out exceptional operations and showed exceptional heroism.

Yes, Aliyev has a problem to emphasize the personal factor in the Azerbaijani victory in the 44-day war against the background of the political actions and incompetence of the Azerbaijani government in the first war.

On the other hand, there may be a grain of truth in the last statement, but it is another question that when accusing the Armenian side of the “Khojalu Genocide”, which happened this time as well, Aliyev does not try to enter into the political developments prevailing in Azerbaijan at that time, it is not beneficial.

On February 26, 1992, the self-defense forces of Artsakh, thanks to a brilliant operation, liberated Khojalu (Ivanyan), the second most important military base in Artsakh after Shushi, from the enemy.

The military operation was carried out in order to unblock the airport of Stepanakert near the village of Khojalu (Ivanyan) and neutralize the Azerbaijani firing points located in the village.

And before the military operation, in order to safely remove the local population, the Armenians informed not only about the upcoming operations, but also the civilian population was informed about the corridor through which they could and should go to Aghdam through the valley of the Karkar River, which was controlled by the Azerbaijanis. In other words, the Azeri side is responsible for the murders of Azerbaijanis in that area, as the former president of Azerbaijan, Ayaz Mutalibov, once admitted: ““Khojalu” organized the People’s Front of Azerbaijan. who later had to resign.

On May 10, Aliyev accused Armenia and the Armenian armed forces of targeting peaceful settlements during the 2020 war in Kovsakan under Azerbaijani control. in delivering missile strikes from “Iskander” and “Scud”, which was also a subject of discussion during the “trial” against the former military-political leadership of Artsakh.

In other words, Aliyev did not back down from the military accusations directed at Armenia, and Nikol Pashinyan in his pre-election statements “reports” and “testifies” against Armenia in the event that he himself was declared the commander-in-chief of the 44-day war.

Of course, he can try to justify himself by saying, “I didn’t know,” the military leadership “decided to attack the peaceful settlements of Azerbaijan.”

Do you think something like this won’t happen… As for why we lost, this time let’s be satisfied with the above description of Aliyev, the former leadership of Azerbaijan, there were quite a few things in common. And that is why Aliyev wants Pashinyan’s power not to go away, because in this case there is no need for vigilance, which will be necessary in the case of “revanchist forces”.

Europe’s dangerous game, Putin’s “red lines”. 2.7 billion euros: Armenia

May 112026

Russian President Vladimir Putin raises the “price of Russia’s interests” in Armenia’s electoral process, trying to define his “red lines” in Armenia and ensure that Russia does not end up “out of the game”.

About this “Review” of 168 TV mentioned on the air of the program political commentator Hakob Badalyan, speaking about the EU’s activity in Armenia, Putin’s May 9 statements and the intensifying geopolitical competition around Armenia.

“The inaugural Armenia-EU summit is given a “historical” packaging in order to sell the European theme to the Armenian public, first of all, in an electoral sense, and the goal is very simple. Today, Armenia is important from the point of view of the construction of the “Middle Corridor”, but Azerbaijan and Turkey are much more important than Armenia in this matter for Europe, and the Europeans openly talk about it. commented Hakob Badalyan.

Read also

  • “The campaign should be conducted in such a way that it does not turn into “clownada”, it is beneficial only to the ruling political force”. Armen Badalyan
  • Pashinyan was forced… Armenia will become a sacrificial tool. Hayk Nahapetyan
  • Zelensky in Yerevan, Pashinyan’s absence from Red Square. new geopolitical realities

Hakob Badalyan drew attention to the fact that Armenia-EU joint declaration consists of 44 points, connecting it with the symbolism of the ill-fated 44-day war that paved the way for the geopolitical expansion of the European Union to the Caucasus, when the status quo that constrained the European Union in the region was destroyed, and after that the EU conducts a “policy of toast” towards Armenia, which is very clearly expressed in the text of the same joint declaration, and tries to reach a concrete agreement with Azerbaijan and Turkey to form the “Middle Corridor” purpose.

“Besides, Azerbaijan and Turkey obviously demand a high price from Europe, and Armenia plays a very big role in that price, in other words, they devote a lot of space to issues related to Armenia as a price in terms of forming the Middle Corridor or agreeing on that issue. Europe’s role here is to convince Armenia and interest in paying that price.” added the political commentator.

Hakob Badalyan emphasizes that the “pie” of the EU for Armenia is the various financial assistance in the amount of 2.7 billion euros promised from 2021.

“It is the pie that they promise to Armenia, to easily adapt to the ideas of Azerbaijan and Turkey, so that the Middle Corridor is formed, and Europe gets its share in that Middle Corridor.” comments the interlocutor.

Touching upon the question of what political footnotes or motivations Nikol Pashinyan had for not going to Moscow and not being present at the annual military parade held on May 9 in Moscow’s Red Square, Hakob Badalyan reminds that a few days before May 9, on May 4 and 5, a “European Party” was organized in Yerevan in order to provide political and propaganda support to Nikol Pashinyan during the pre-election period.

The commentator justifies his point of view by the fact that the European events, apart from the show and demonstration, did not have any substantive agenda related to Armenia, and going to the military parade in Moscow just 3-4 days after that would mean for Nikol Pashinyan to throw the entire effect of the “European Party” into the water in the propaganda sense.

“And we know that Nikol Pashinyan is trying to capitalize on the European topic for his electorate as much as possible and at the same time to expect loyalty from Europe towards the behavior he shows towards his opponents and political opposition in the internal processes, and I repeat, going to Moscow after a few days would mean throwing the whole thing into the water, and Pashinyan, citing the circumstances of the pre-election campaign, did not go to the parade.” observes Hakob Badalyan.

In this context, Hakob Badalyan also commented on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s statements that it would be right for Armenia to decide as soon as possible whether to join the European Union (EU) or remain a member of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU).

“In my opinion, the Russian president is simply raising the price of Russia’s interests in Armenia’s electoral processes, especially for the current government, and this is why I condition the fact that these topics are regularly addressed at the level of the Russian president, if we also remember the certain unprecedentedness of Putin’s opening speech at the meeting between Putin and Pashinyan on April 1st, and Russia is trying to define its red lines and its determination to pursue them։ Recently, we also see certain actions in the economic field, where Armenia’s dependence is very high.” the political commentator thinks.

Hakob Badalyan emphasizes that this behavior of Russia is due to the fact that other international actors are very directly interfering in the internal processes of Armenia, in particular, the same European Union, the United States, Turkey, Azerbaijan.

«Moreover, let’s note, recording the facts, that Russia does not express direct support to this or that power in the sense of attitude, but only announced that they are pursuing their interests, so that Russia does not appear “out of the game”“, added the political commentator.

As for the issue of Armenia’s accession to the European Union, Hakob Badalyan believes that it is a matter of the far future, if Armenia ever comes close to it, and adds his conviction that the European Union has absolutely no intention of accepting Armenia into its membership.

And the fact that Putin said that in his opinion it would be right for the citizens of Armenia to decide on this issue, for example, by holding a referendum, the political commentator notes that this is a requirement of the Constitution of Armenia, and it is clear that similar issues should be resolved through a referendum in order to remove the issue of EU membership from the field of internal political populism or geopolitical dodges.

“I think it is unrealistic to think that as long as Turkey is not a member of the EU, any Caucasian state can become a member of the EU, and Turkey is unlikely to become a member of the EU as long as France is a member of the EU, unless, of course, France renounces its state-strategic interests and becomes an affiliate of some other geopolitical project.” added the analyst.

According to Hakob Badalyan, one of the main dangers is that a “geopolitical bet” can be made on destabilization in the Caucasus, instead of establishing stability.

“And its importance for Europe is growing, and it is not at all a vague prospect that the European Union may even try to bet on destabilization here in order to advance its interests with that logic. Finally, let me repeat, that path was opened more intensively for the European Union after the destabilization in the Caucasus, after the 44-day war. Now all parties are raising the stakes, showing that they are ready to go to the end, and here we can have only one response: to increase our state and public qualities, and the possibility of this is to achieve at least a change of government on June 7.” adds the commentator.

Full interview in the video.