Armenia’s Diamond Polishing Drops in Value

IDEX Online, Israel
Aug 11 2004
Armenia’s Diamond Polishing Drops in Value

(August 11, ’04, 5:23 Edahn Golan)

Armenia’s diamond polishing efforts fell 17 percent during the first
half of the year to 63.1 billion dram ($113.7 million) while
increasing in weight.
Karen Chshmaritian, Armenia’s Trade and Economic Development
Minister, says the increase in carat output is due to stronger global
demand for smaller gems.
Armenia has imported 70,000 carats of rough diamonds from Russia
under a government-to-government agreement during the first six
months of the year
Armenia is interested in importing up to 400,000 carats of rough
diamonds this year under the agreement with Russia.

Symphony Concert

Cape Times – South Africa
Aug 11 2004
Symphony Concert
By Deon Irish
Thursday, August 5, City Hall; CPO conducted by Leslie B Dunner,
soloists Suren Bagratuni, Beverley Chiat; Dvorak: Cello Concerto in B
minor, Op 104; Mahler: Symphony No 4 in G major.
Even the miserable winter conditions did not prevent a pleasantly
full – even if not packed – house for a neatly balanced programme of
symphonic masterpieces, sponsored by Cape Gate on the occasion of its
75th anniversary.
Dvorak’s glorious concerto was written in the last months of his
three-year stay in New York, a period which also produced the popular
symphony From the New World to be featured in this week’s concert.
It is the work of a composer at the height of his creative powers
and, more pertinently, self-confidence. In the case of the finale,
for example, he was unmoved in withstanding the pressures of his
technical adviser, the cellist Hans Wihan, and of his publisher,
neither of whom cared for the relatively quiet concluding measures of
the work.
A concluding cadenza was suggested – even written out by Wihan – but
the composer was adamant: “I will give you my work only if you
promise not to allow anyone to make changes – friend Wihan not
excepted…”
Dvorak’s judgment has stood the test of time and in this performance,
the Armenian-born cellist, Suren Bagratuni, demonstrated just why the
work retains its prime status in the cello repertoire.
It does require a neat partnership between soloist and conductor for
the orchestration, cunningly tailored to the soloist’s needs, has
nevertheless the potential to overwhelm. On this occasion, orchestral
climaxes were repeatedly too brass-dominated in scale, resulting in a
somewhat unbalanced overall architecture.
The soloist displayed considerable artistry on his instrument, with
an admirable purposefulness which ensured that the solo line remained
consistently focused. Bowing was many-faceted and intonation secure.
But the greater pleasure came from personal touches which, through
subtle alterations of tempo and the infusion of a rhapsodic element,
gave individual personality to a well-known score.
Accompaniment featured many good things – including some fine horn
solos and finely controlled soft trumpet chords – but there was some
indifferent ensemble – not least in the final crescendo, which only
just held together.
The visiting American conductor, Leslie B Dunner, then took centre
stage for the Mahler 4th Symphony and demonstrated a facility with
the score which proved ingratiating. The work is Mahler’s shortest
and happiest symphony; and has as its genesis a rejected seventh
movement for his already monumental third symphony!
The movement was to be called What the Child tells me and, in this
symphony, it becomes the final revelation of all that goes before, a
song in which the soprano replicates the
innocent joy of a child’s vision of heaven, presenting an uncannily
contemporary obsession with culinary ingredients.
Beverley Chiat sang with musicality and a joyful intent, in most part
capturing the composer’s direction to replicate a childlike
brilliance.
This is a work in which the self-gnawing angst which beset the
composer was, for a brief while, operating at only fractional
strength.
But the morbidities are there; the acerbic tunes and neurotic
accompaniments abound and, even if it does culminate in a child-like
vision, we are constrained to admit that it is a very odd child.
Dunner led the orchestra in a generally assured and frequently
insightful account of the score; but, such anguish as there was
seemed (perhaps understandably) that of a rather different oppression
from that understood by the composer. The same old story, but told
with a somewhat different accent.

Slander – Liberal Lies About Christianity

American Daily, OH
Aug 11 2004
Slander – Liberal Lies About Christianity
By Bruce Walker (08/28/2003)
Ann Coulter wrote a magnificent book describing how liberals slander
conservatives. This deliberate campaign of defamation also describes
how liberals approach traditional Christianity. Belief in a Creator
whose moral authority transcends every conceivable ideology or
institution of man is anathema to the secular dogmatists of the Left.
Consequently, Leftism is hostile to any serious ethical monotheism.
But Christianity is to Leftists what America was to the Soviet Union:
the `Main Enemy.’ Why? Because Christianity teaches us that though we
are born with murder in our hearts, God can replace that murder with
love.
The good news of Christianity contradicts all the bad news of class
exploitation theories, racial hatred, sexism, and any other social
pathology which poisons people against other people. Christianity
says that material accomplishments will never change the world,
conquering armies will never change the world, and only divine love
can change the world.
This threatens everyone who craves power, prestige and popularity –
those tokens of value which Leftists crave like addicts crave drugs.
No fame, fortune or power; no hordes of people screaming hoarse cries
to the Fuhrer or the Vozd can ever do what the simplest prayer of a
ordinary, trusting soul to his Creator can do.
Leftism pretends to be new and fresh, but it is ancient and foul.
Leftism was antiquated long before Marx or the revolutionaries of
France had their say. It is no more than envy, pride and lies dressed
in finery.
Leftists once whispered to Alexander the Great that more conquests
and slaughter would make him a god. It proclaimed to the brutally
efficient Romans that aqueducts and roads – `infrastructure’ –
justified the enslavement, the slaughter, and the conquest of
millions.
Leftism whispered to the Bourbons of France that the exquisite art of
Versailles made up for callousness toward the poor, and it guided
Robespierre to decapitate people with the `crime’ of noble birth
based upon the greater good of the masses.
Leftism led Hitler to Marxism, then to National Socialism and always
away from a loving God. Leftism guided the hand of Mussolini in his
first political essay – `God Does Not Exist’- and guided his life
according to that atheistic dogmatism. Leftism has guided every
Marxist leader in the Twentieth Century to casual democide,
capricious torments and blase corruption.
Leftism says above all else that the end justifies the means and that
the proper ends are no more than what men who with truncheons say
that those ends should be. Recoiling at Jesus is the instinct of all
Leftism. Redwood forests may be holy to Leftists. Academia may be
infallible truth to Leftists. Savagery in the vindication of old,
presumed wrongs may be the sacrament of Leftism. But Jesus is the
negation of these and every phantom of meaning in the ultimate
nihilism that is Leftism.
Christianity is an unparalleled force for good in human history –
whatever one believes about the metaphysical validity of Christian
doctrine – and this very success in transforming the world for the
better makes vicious slander of true Christianity is indispensable to
Leftism. Recall the motto of revolutionary socialism: `The worse, the
better.’
The defamation of Christianity is not important to other faiths.
Religiously serious Jews and Moslems, like Christians, are anchored
in transcendent values. Franz Rosenzwieg, probably the most important
Jewish theologian of the Twentieth Century, considered Christianity
to be the Judaism of non-Jews – an equally valid path to the Holy
One. Martin Buber, a Jewish theologian of equally great repute,
considered Jesus as `my brother’ and as a great Jewish teacher.
Islam considers Jesus to be a great prophet – equal in stature to
Abraham and Moses. Slandering and mocking Jesus in strictly Islamic
countries is a very serious criminal offense. No one could produce
Last Temptation of Christ in Saudi Arabia or Iran.
Pious Jews and Moslems, of course, hold different beliefs than pious
Christians. But pious Quakers, Catholics, Baptists, Mormons and
Russian Orthodox Christians hold differing beliefs regarding
Christianity as well.
All three major monotheistic religions – Jews, Moslems and the
various denominations of Christianity – believe absolutely in a
Blessed Creator of the Universe. Each submits himself to moral laws
which transcend man and mankind. Indeed, Islam roughly translates as
`submission to the will of the One Lord.’
Leftists, however, fancy themselves gods. They will always be the
worst and most emphatic slanderers of Christianity. How is this
ancient slander manifested? Not by some different version of the
absurd anti-Judaic fraud, like the Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion, but rather by repeating factual inaccuracies about Christians
which over time become accepted as fact.
How deeply have these slanders infected modern consciousness?
Consider some of the following `facts’ which most of us consider as
true without thought or reflection.
Christopher Columbus, we learn in history books, proved that the
world was round by traveling to what he thought was India (and was
actually the Western Hemisphere) – right? Wrong. Christians never
proposed the absurd proposition that the world was flat. Until the
1830s, no one believed that Christians in medieval Europe had ever
thought that the world was flat.
One French and two American writers – Antoine-Jean Letronne, John
Draper, and Andrew Dickson White – schemed to create a non-existent
schism between Christianity (which these men loathed) and science
(which these men thought our secular salvation). They simply said
that medieval Christians believed something that was never believed
by these Christians at all.
If anything, Christian science and Christian theology at the time of
Colombus explained the spherical nature of the Earth better than
other systems of thought. The journey of Colombus was not about
discovering the roundness of the Earth, but about finding another
route to Café and India. Why invent this myth? The purpose was to
make Christians, whose intellectual achievements were transforming
human thought, appear ignorant and childish: pure slander.
The Earth revolves around the sun, but most of us have been taught to
believe that Christians uniquely resisted this cosmological fact.
This proposition is so absurd that malice against Christianity is the
only conceivable motive for it. Every scientists involved in proving
the heliocentric theory – Copernicus, Kepler, Napier and Galileo –
were Christians. Yet the trial of Galileo is reflexively assumed as
evidence of Christian bigotry toward science. Was it?
Galileo was not tried based upon theological objections to his
theory, but rather upon scientific objections to his theory. These
scientific objections showed intellectual rigor, not laziness. The
Ptolemaic theory, which was accepted not just by Christians but by
Moslems and Jews, worked. The sophisticated system of concentric
circular orbits accurately predicted eclipses and accurately guided
ship captains across oceans.
The heliocentric theory that was proposed by Galileo, by contrast,
did not work. If his theory was true, then we should have been able
to perceive stellar parallaxes. Galileo himself acknowledged this
problem and that he could not explain the absence of such evidence.
Centuries later, a stellar parallax was observed – but this remained
a serious defect in his theory at the time of his trial.
Galileo said that the planets circle the sun. They do not. The
planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun, which is a
critically important fact in how the bodies of the solar system move
in space.
Galileo proposed a heliocentric theory of the universe rather than a
geocentric theory of the universe. He was completely wrong. The sun
travels through the cosmos, just like the Earth. It is not, as
Galileo insisted, the unmoving center of the universe.
Galileo could not answer these scientifically serious problems with
his theory, but the Catholic Church did not even demand that Galileo
stop expounding his heliocentric theory. He could even proposed that
his theory of how the heavenly bodies moved was superior to the
Ptolemaic theory. The trial of Galileo resulted in a verdict
directing that he cease teaching his theory as fact.
Education, at this time, was taught in religious institutions
throughout the world. Consequently, the Catholic church had a duty to
protect students from intellectually false studies. That was all
which the trial purported to address, and the Church was right and
Galileo was wrong: the theory he proposed was wrong in two critical
areas and was unprovable as fact in those areas in which his theory
contained some scientific truth.
These two misrepresentations of Christian intellectual understanding
were calculated slanders. Even worse have been those slanders which
paint Christians as bigoted and immoral. How often have we been
warned about the horrors of the Salem Witch Trials? Hollywood and
every other vehicle for Christophobic venom has painted this as one
of the darkest chapters of religion and justice in human history.
This episode is important because it is the worst example that
anti-American Christophobes can find of religious injustice in
America, but consider the actual facts of the cases.
In 1692 a total of twenty people were executed for witchcraft. Within
five years of these executions, the Massachusetts general court
offered public repentance for these actions. It also deplored the
action of the judges in these cases. One of these judges publically
confessed his sin from the pulpit. The jurors who convicted the
alleged witches signed a statement of regret. Member of the families
of those who had been executed were offered indemnities.
The Salem Witch Trials were an example of religious hysteria leading
to tragic results, but human history is filled with endless examples
of such punishment of the innocent. What should amaze serious
historians is the unprecedented, total and timely repudiation of this
crime by the very people who perpetrated it. When else in history has
this happened?
Moslem Turkey today does not recognize its genocide of 1.5 million
Armenian Christians in the Twentieth Century. China does not
acknowledge any fault in its genocide of Tibetan Buddhists. The
Soviet Union never apologized for its extermination of millions of
believing Christians.
But Christians in New England, over three centuries ago, took their
miscarriage of justice very seriously and did precisely what Jesus
instructed them to do: repent quickly and completely. Why does
Hollywood and history books make so much of this event?
The answer to that question is easy: how many of you knew only about
the witch trials themselves, often in great detail, but knew nothing
at all about the utter and absolute repudiation of this sad episode
by the Christians of Massachusetts Bay Colony within five years of
the trials?
Why do most people know nothing about the 1.5 Million Polish
Christians stuffed into cattle cars and sent to concentration camps
by Soviets between September 1939 and June 1941? Why do most people
not know that Germans joining the Schutzstaffel or `SS’ – the
monsters who perpetrated the Holocaust – were required to renounce
their Christianity?
Christians are blamed for the Holocaust. This horrific slaughter of
more than six million Jewish men, women and children is rightly
condemned as among the worst crimes of the Twentieth Century or,
indeed, of human history.
But the very first people who voluntarily opposed Hitler and his Nazi
Regime out of religious conscience were the Protestant clergy of
Germany. Had they simply ignored the evil of Nazism, they could have
lived in relative comfort and safety. Most did not.
The political ruler in Europe who risked the most to save Jews, who
did so with no hope for any earthly reward, and who saved at least
forty thousand Jews from extermination, was also the most profoundly
religious political ruler on the continent of Europe: Francisco
Franco of Spain.
When Tsarist Russia began its last round of pogroms at the end of the
Nineteenth Century, the loudest voices in opposition were Christian
church leaders from around the world. When the long exile of Jews
from England ended, this was the result of the only governor of
England who owed his power specifically because of the utter support
of pious Christians, Oliver Cromwell, the great Puritan commander.
When Jews first found a real home after the diaspora, the safety and
security of America, it was George Washington, who embraced
Christianity more seriously than perhaps any president in American
history, who wrote his famous `Letter to the Jews of Newport.’
This document, which is still read every year in some synagogues,
goes far beyond simple toleration, which cynical and irreligious
European rulers of the Enlightenment had often offered Jews, but
protection against bigotry and persecution. The letter is not
legalism, but morality – Christian morality – that welcomed Jews to
America.
Leftists lie about Christianity. Leftists slander Christians because
as look as people worship a loving God in a gentle theology, they
will never worship the secular gods of a hateful misology.

Bruce Walker has been a dyed in the wool conservative since, as a
sixth grader, he campaigned door to door for Barry Goldwater. Bruce
has had almost two hundred published articles have appeared several
professional and political periodicals.

BAKU: Armenia Has No Plans to Stop Military Actions in Karabakh

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
Aug 11 2004
Armenia Has No Plans to Stop Military Actions in Karabakh
Baku Today 11/08/2004 18:55
On August 3-10 Armenian armed forces with so-called Karabakh Army ran
military maneuvers in Nagorno Karabakh, Turan reported on Wednesday.
The maneuvers consisted of three stages – to bring armed forces to
alertness, to prepare and then realize combat operations.
Armenian military units participated in the final stage of the
maneuvers, which aimed to train the armed forces to defeat
conventional enemies. The final stage of maneuvers completed on
August 10 in Aghdam, the Azerbaijani district occupied by Armenian
forces.
The maneuvers ran under the observation of Armenian Defense Minister,
Serj Sarkisyan and leaders of so-called Nagorno Karabakh Republic.
`One of the main purposes of the maneuvers was to bring the armed
units ready for military operations as much as possible,’ said Seyran
Oganian, Commander of so-called Karabakh troops. `Our enemy purchases
new types of armaments and develops its army. The party building arms
and accomplishing assigned tasks more correctly, will win.’
Concerning the possibility of resumption of military operations in
Karabakh, Sarkisyan said that in the nearest future Armenia doesn’t
have any plans to stop the military actions.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Iranian University to Start Teaching Kurdish

Payvand, Iran
Aug 11 2004
Iranian University to Start Teaching Kurdish
In a groundbreaking attempt, Kurdish would be taught at Kurdistan
University, west of Iran, for the very first time come the new
academic year, Iranian Cultural Heritage News Agency reported on
Wednesday.
It is decided that 30 eager students would be allowed to learn the
historical language academically, announced Bahram Valadbeigi, head
of the Kurdistan Institute.
He highlighted the similar roots of Kurdish and Persian languages,
saying `Expanding local languages would definitely boost the official
one.’
The editor of the Kurdish weekly `Ashti’ (reconciliation) also
expressed his gratitude to authorities in Iranian Higher Education
Ministry and hoped the language be taught in other universities as
well.
In Iran, 90 percent of Kurds live in villages, the rest are nomadic.
With a checkered history of acceptance and restriction of Kurdish in
modern Iran, a thriving literature in Iran has been slow to develop.
Since 1984 government policy has been open: Kurdish is permitted in
schools in Kurdish areas; a stream of publications has begun to
appear, and there are long-wave external broadcasts in Kurdish as
well as regional broadcasts on medium-wave radio in Kurdish and other
minority languages.
Kurdish, as a term, is often used to refer to two separate but
closely related language variants: Kurmanji (or Northern Kurdish) and
Kurdi (Southern Kurdish). Kurdi (sometimes Sorani) is spoken in Iraq
(2.8 million people), and in Iran (3 million people), especially in
regions bordering on Iraq and in a small enclave in the northeastern
province of Khorasan.
Kurmanji (sometimes Kurmanci) is mostly confined to Turkey (4
million) and northern Iraq (2.8 million). It is also spoken in Syria
(500,000); Armenia (100,000) in regions bordering Iraq; and in Iran
(100,000) south of Armenia and east of Iraq. There are unknown
numbers of speakers in Georgia and Azerbaijan. Smaller communities
speak the language (about 70 thousand) in Lebanon and in Europe, the
US, and Canada.
Total speakers of Kurdi probably number about 6 million and Kurmanji
speakers about 7 million, although some authorities cite a total of
20 million. Estimates of ethnic Kurds, not all of whom speak Kurdish
today because of assimilation, also are high. Some people who regard
themselves as Kurds speak Gurani and Zaza (or Dimli), closely related
Indo-European languages of a non-Kurdish group.

VoA: International Community Criticizes Nagorno-Karabakh Election

Voice of America, DC
Aug 11 2004
International Community Criticizes Nagorno-Karabakh Election
Bill Gasperini
Moscow

The United States and some international organizations have
criticized last Sunday’s local elections in the Azerbaijan’s
breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, saying it will not help ongoing
negotiations over the status of the enclave. The local elections,
which Nagorno Karabakh officials say could help pave the way for the
region’s international recognition, angered the Azeri government.
The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which is
sponsoring negotiations to bring peace to the region, said Sunday’s
election in Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian-populated province of
Azerbaijan that broke away after a bloody war, was not helpful to the
peace process.
OSCE spokesman in Vienna, Ayhan Evrensel, says that any lasting
solution must come from within.
“What the OSCE through the co-chairs is trying [to do] is to
facilitate a solution, to bring the sides together and discuss about
the issues,” he said. “It has to come from both sides.”
Under the auspices of the OSCE, a group of countries forming the so
called Minsk group, has been talking with Armenia and Azerbaijan in
an effort to resolve the conflict. They have made numerous proposals
over the last decade, but little headway.
The U.S. State Department said the elections have no effect on the
peace process. In a written statement, the State Department said,
“Obviously we don’t recognize Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent
country. The future status of Nagorno Karabakh, the State Department
said, is a matter of negotiation in the Minsk process.
The United States, along with France and Russia are leading the
negotiation process.
Azerbaijan lost control of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjoining
districts after a six-year conflict with Armenia, which broke out in
1988 and claimed more than 30,000 lives. It ended with a cease-fire
agreement in 1994, and left Armenian forces in control of the enclave
and the buffer zone around it.
The United Nations Security Council has denounced the occupation of
Azerbaijani lands and has demanded that Armenia withdraw its forces.
With the exception of Armenia, no nation recognizes Nagorno-Karabakh
as an independent political entity.
Nagorno-Karabakh authorities defended Sunday’s elections as an
expression of democracy in the enclave. But authorities in Azerbaijan
reacted strongly to this assertion, calling the elections illegal
because they were held outside their jurisdiction.
Officials in the Azeri capital Baku said people uprooted during the
war over the enclave were unable to vote, and that the elections
could not be called representative.
While the cease-fire generally holds the two countries at an uneasy
peace, shooting incidents still occur periodically along the
cease-fire line not far from Nagorno-Karabakh’s capital city,
Stepanakert.

Karabakh war games as realistic as possible – NKR DM

Karabakh war games as realistic as possible – NKR DM
Arminfo, Yerevan
10 Aug 04
STEPANAKERT
One of the principles applied to the large-scale military exercises
conducted by the defence army of the Nagornyy Karabakh Republic (NKR)
was to bring these exercises as close to military operations as
possible, the defence minister of the NKR, Seyran Oganyan, said
commenting on the exercises of the Nagornyy Karabakh defence army.
“I think future military operations, if they happen to take place,
will be different from those of 1992-94. The present exercises were
like military operations that could be expected in future,” Seyran
Oganyan added.

NKR Willing to Return Azerbaijani Captive if Official Baky Wishes

AUTHORITIES OF NAGORNO KARABAKH EXPRESS WILLINGNESS TO GIVE UP
AZERBAIJAN CAPTIVE IF OFFICIAL BAKU WISHES
YEREVAN, August 10 (Noyan Tapan). Dweller of Baku Anad Mamedov, a
21-year-old Azeri serviceman, was taken captive by the Nagorno
Karabakh Armed Forces in connection with the violation of the border
on August 6. According to the press service of the NKR Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, the NKR authorities reported about it to the ICRC
Stepanakert Office, as well as to the OSCE. Now the republican legal
bodies undertake corresponding measures for the specification of the
reasons and purposes of the violation of the border by the captive.
According to the same source, the NKR authorities gave the
representative of the ICRC Office in Stepanakert an opportunity to
visit the Azerbaijani military prisoner, at the same time expressing
willingness to give him up, if official Baku wishes.

Stone Processing Co. To Operate in Ijevan Before End of Year

ENTERPRISE OF STONE PROCESSING TO BE PUT INTO OPERATION IN IJEVAN TILL
END OF THIS YEAR
IJEVAN, August 11 (Noyan Tapan). The enterprise of stone processing
will be put into operation in Ijevan till the end of this year.
Noyemberyan felsit, basalt and travertine from the Ararat Valley will
be processed in the industrial shop of 1,800 square meters. The
construction is carried out upon the initiative of Artur Baghrian, a
businessman and philanthropist living in Moscow, knight of
“St. Gregory Illuminator” order. A church and a sport school have also
been constructed due to his funds in the village of Voskevan of the
Tavush region beforehand. Misha Gamzian, head of the construction
work, told NT’s correspondent that part of stone-processing lathes and
saws have already been imported from Italy. Laying-in of raw materials
also started.

PM to Focus on 12 Bln Drams worth of Program Implentation

IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAMS OF 12 BLN DRAMS TO BE IN CENTER OF
ATTENTION OF RA PRIME MINISTER
YEREVAN, August 11 (Noyan Tapan). The process of the fulfillment of
the instructions given by RA Prime Minister Andranik Margarian during
the previous consultation within the framework of the application of
the RA law “On the Introduction of Amendments in the RA Law “On 2004
State Budget” was discussed during the August 10 consultation held at
the RA Prime Minister. According to the RA government’s press service,
during the June 16 consultation the RA Prime Minister mentioned that
the implementation of programs planned at the expense of 12 bln drams
and approved on the basis of the amendments proposed by the government
will be permanently in the center of the attention of the RA Prime
Minister. He especially stressed the importance of quick and
qualitative carrying out of all the work. The Ministers of
Agriculture, Transport and Communication, the Chairman of the State
Water Committee have already presented reports on the carried out
work. Estimating, in general, the presented results as satisfactory,
the RA Prime Minister gave instructions on the improvement of the
quality of some work on road construction and asphalting. The RA
Minister of Urban Development, the Yerevan Mayor and the Heads of the
regional administrations of the republic presented the process of the
work carried out at the expense of the above-mentioned 12 bln drams,
in particular, the work directed at the construction and overhaul of
the entities of education. According to these reports, the RA Ministry
of Urban Development mainly carries out the work on the holding of
tenders and on the conclusion of agreements in satisfactory rates: in
the regions and Yerevan, the Governor’s Offices of Armavir, Ararat,
Lori, Kotayk, Shirak, Vayots Dzor and Tavush. The Governors of
Armavir, Shirak and Vayots Dzor reported that the majority of work on
construction and overhaul of schools has already started in their
regions. It was mentioned that repeated tenders were announced for the
repairs of some buildings of schools. In the Shirak region it was
decided to start the construction of a new building of the school in
2005 instead of the unexpedient repairs of a school in the village of
Vardakar. The Yerevan Mayor’s Office, the regional administrations of
Syunik, Gegharkunik and Aragatsotn haven’t held tenders for
construction and repairs of schools yet. The official registration of
planning-estimate documents draws to an end here. During the period
under review the RA Prime Minister estimated their work as
satisfactory. Andranik Margarian instructed the heads of the
Ministries and Departments, as well as the Governors to pay more
attention to the process of the official registration of documents for
the holding of tenders, to the qualitative carrying out of the work in
the speeded up regime in order to put the education entities into
operation in set terms. The RA Prime Minister once again mentioned
that such consultations will be held periodically till the end of this
year with the purpose of consideration of the already carried out work
and the problems of the next stage.