Armenia discusses restoration of inactive railway sections

Russia12:39, 8 October 2026
Read the article in: EspañolՀայերենРусскийTürkçe

The top executive of Russian Railways will visit Armenia next week to discuss issues related to the restoration of railway sections in Armenia that are currently not in operation, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said.

“Regarding the railway, at the previous meeting we reached an agreement within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). As a result of that agreement, the president of Russian Railways will arrive in Armenia next week. We will have a working discussion and will also draw certain conclusions based on the results of that working discussion. I cannot predict what will happen after the meeting,” Pashinyan said at a press briefing.

The Prime Minister also addressed a statement by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexey Overchuk that an offer made to Yerevan to restore the Yeraskh section and the Gyumri-Kars section remains in effect.

“I know that a Kazakh company has also expressed interest in restoring the Akhurik and Yeraskh sections. There are various issues; we will discuss them,” the Prime Minister said.

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Pashinyan: Azerbaijan has not requested extradition of serviceman detained in

Law13:02, 8 October 2026
Read the article in: العربيةEspañolՀայերենРусскийTürkçe中文

Azerbaijan has not filed an extradition request for its serviceman who was apprehended in Armenia after crossing into the country and wounding a village resident last week, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said.

“There is no extradition request from Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan has also opened a criminal case and issued a statement. Azerbaijan may want to conduct an investigation as part of its own criminal case as well. If that serviceman goes to Azerbaijan, he will not be going home; he will be tried in Azerbaijan if he ends up there,” Pashinyan said.

The Prime Minister again noted that the Azerbaijani serviceman committed a crime on the territory of Armenia.

“He committed several crimes, but the culmination was shooting at our citizen. I am not saying, ‘let a verdict be handed down, let it go through three instances, and then I’ll look at the verdict and see whether he committed a crime or not.’ I am saying that he committed a crime,” Pashinyan said at a press briefing.

Armenia’s National Security Service said last Thursday that it had been notified by Azerbaijani authorities on September 29 that an Azerbaijani serviceman had allegedly gone absent without leave and was missing. The Azerbaijani side did not rule out that he could have crossed into Armenia. Armenia and Azerbaijan conducted a search operation. Later, on October 1, Armenian emergency services received a report that a 39-year-old Armenian woman had been shot in the leg at her home in the Shaki settlement in Syunik Province. Authorities determined that the Azerbaijani serviceman was the shooter, and he was apprehended shortly afterward in Shaki and detained.

Meanwhile, health authorities said earlier last week that the woman was in stable, non-life-threatening condition and was receiving the required treatment. She was transferred to Yerevan after being initially hospitalized in Sisian. The Sisian Medical Center reported that the injured Armenian citizen’s children, who were with their mother during the incident, aged 15 and 12, had sought medical assistance for injuries. The 12-year-old child had a soft-tissue contusion, while the 15-year-old child had a fracture of the right wrist. Health authorities said that the children are in satisfactory condition.

The Azerbaijani serviceman, currently in pre-trial detention, faces charges of illegally crossing Armenia’s state border, smuggling military-use products, firearms and ammunition, illegally trafficking in firearms and ammunition, unlawful entry into another person’s residence, and causing grievous bodily harm under aggravating circumstances, including with a firearm.

Read the article in: العربيةEspañolՀայերենРусскийTürkçe中文

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Pashinyan leaves for Turkmenistan to participate in CIS summit

Politics13:17, 8 October 2026
Read the article in: العربيةEspañolFrançaisՀայերենРусскийTürkçe中文

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has left for Turkmenistan on a two-day visit to participate in the CIS summit, his spokesperson Melania Harutyunyan has said.

The summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) will take place in the city of Turkmenbashi.

Read the article in: العربيةEspañolFrançaisՀայերենРусскийTürkçe中文

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Pashinyan arrives in Turkmenistan for CIS summit

Asia15:36, 8 October 2026
Read the article in: FrançaisՀայերենРусский

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has arrived in Turkmenistan on a two-day visit to participate in the CIS summit.

The Prime Minister’s Office said that Pashinyan was welcomed at Turkmenbashi International Airport by Turkmenistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Rashid Meredov.

The CIS summit is taking place in the Turkmen city of Turkmenbashi.

Read the article in: FrançaisՀայերենРусский

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Armenian PM meets Turkmenistan’s President

Politics15:53, 8 October 2026
Read the article in: العربيةFrançaisՀայերենРусскийTürkçe中文

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan held a meeting with President of Turkmenistan Serdar Berdimuhamedov in the city of Turkmenbashi, where he arrived today for the CIS summit.

According to a readout from the Prime Minister’s Office, during the one-on-one meeting President Serdar Berdimuhamedov welcomed the Armenian Prime Minister’s visit and emphasized the importance of developing bilateral cooperation in various areas. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan thanked him for the warm hospitality and added that the Armenian government is interested in expanding and deepening both political and trade and economic ties.

The Armenian and Turkmen leaders exchanged views on various issues related to the Armenia–Turkmenistan bilateral agenda.

Read the article in: العربيةFrançaisՀայերենРусскийTürkçe中文

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Armenia, Uzbekistan discuss expansion of trade ties

Politics17:01, 8 October 2026
Read the article in: العربيةEspañolFrançaisՀայերենРусскийTürkçe中文

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan met with Uzbekistan’s President Shavkat Mirziyoyev in Turkmenistan, where both leaders are visiting for the CIS summit, to be held in the city of Turkmenbashi.

PM Pashinyan and President Mirziyoyev discussed issues related to Armenia-Uzbekistan relations and their further development, according to a readout from the Prime Minister’s Office.

The development and expansion of trade and economic ties was emphasized.

They exchanged views on regional processes. Both sides highlighted the establishment of peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the promotion of regional cooperation.

Read the article in: العربيةEspañolFrançaisՀայերենРусскийTürkçe中文

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Pashinyan on extradition of Azerbaijani soldier, meeting Aliyev and Medvedev’s

JAM News
Oct 8, 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

The extradition of Azerbaijani serviceman Nasimi Musayev is not under discussion, and Baku has not made such a request. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan told journalists this during his traditional hour-long briefing.

“What extradition are you talking about? There is no such issue, and we are not discussing it. Azerbaijan has made no request,” he said.

At the same time, he stressed that Armenia would have returned Musayev on the same day if he had not committed a crime.

Pashinyan described the Azerbaijani serviceman, who illegally crossed into Armenia and shot a resident of the village of Shaki, as having committed an “ordinary crime”. The prime minister drew parallels with other forms of cross-border crime:

“We also have other cases of cross-border crime. Drugs are constantly exported to Armenia and transported through Armenia in transit. There is no need to turn this into an apocalypse.”

The prime minister does not believe the incident in Shaki could threaten the peace process between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

He considers the peace that Armenia and Azerbaijan have established an achievement that requires protection. He warns that they could destroy it in a day, while reaching the current state of relations could take another 30 years. For this reason, he does not consider it appropriate to make statements that could threaten the peace process.

On 1 October 2026, Nasimi Musayev illegally entered the village of Shaki in Armenia’s Syunik Province. Local residents found him inside a house, where he opened fire with an assault rifle and wounded a 39-year-old woman. Her three children witnessed the incident. Her two sons also suffered injuries, while her daughter has yet to recover psychologically.

Musayev fled after the shooting, but authorities detained him shortly afterwards in another house. The Armenian Prosecutor’s Office brought criminal charges under five articles of the Criminal Code. The charges include illegally crossing the border, causing serious bodily harm to a local resident and violating the inviolability of a home. A court ordered his detention for two months.

During the briefing, the prime minister also addressed Dmitry Medvedev’s controversial statement about turning Armenia into a “new Ukraine”, a possible meeting with Aliyev at the CIS summit and the issue of missing persons.


  • Opinion from Yerevan: Baku steps up pressure on Armenia with new tools
  • Azerbaijani soldier enters Armenia, fires at local residents
  • ‘Unresolved issues and conflicting narratives remain’ — Pashinyan on relations with Azerbaijan

“No official meetings are planned”: on contacts with Putin and Aliyev

On 8-9 October, Pashinyan will attend the CIS summit in Turkmenistan. Asked about possible meetings with the presidents of Russia and Azerbaijan, he recalled that his latest meetings with Putin and Aliyev took place in Bishkek last month. He also spoke to the Russian president by phone the day before.

“The format is such that contacts with the president of Russia and the president of Azerbaijan will certainly take place. We will be in the same place today and tomorrow. No official meeting is planned. If it turns out that such a meeting is necessary, it may take place,” he said.

“Armenia has already faced such a threat”: response to Medvedev

People in Armenia continue to discuss Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev’s statement. He said that Armenia’s leadership had decided to change the country’s course and that this would not lead to anything good.

“The worst thing that could happen to Armenia is for it to turn into a new Ukraine,” Medvedev said.

Journalists asked Pashinyan whether Armenia could face such a threat. He replied:

“Armenia has already faced a similar danger and situation. In September 2022, [during the Azerbaijani armed forces’ invasion of Armenia’s sovereign territory], the CSTO failed to fulfil its obligations.”

The Collective Security Treaty Organisation is a military alliance led by Russia. Armenia is a member of the CSTO. Under the organisation’s charter, its allies had to provide military assistance to a member state, but that did not happen.

The Armenian prime minister could not explain why Medvedev was making such statements and threats:

“Following the same logic, someone else could say: ‘We do not want Armenia to turn into a “new Russia”, given that explosions can be heard in various parts of Russia.’ This is an unfortunate genre.”

He assured that Armenia would not turn into anything else and would instead become an even more independent state.

“Some circles in Azerbaijan use this issue for political purposes”: on missing persons

Azerbaijan periodically demands that Armenia provide information about the fate of missing Azerbaijanis and the locations of their graves. President Ilham Aliyev repeated the demand at an international conference on missing persons in Baku.

According to Armenia’s prime minister, both sides should make joint efforts to establish the fate of missing people:

“We have stated that we are ready to cooperate. The problem is that some circles in Azerbaijan use this issue for political purposes, including to generate hostile rhetoric and pursue other aims.”

According to figures Pashinyan presented, the whereabouts of around 1,000 people who went missing during wars since the 1990s remain unknown in Armenia.

He says the wording itself — “their whereabouts are unknown” — shows how little information the authorities have about these people:

“Some circles in Azerbaijan sometimes try to create the impression that we know where these people are and refuse to share the information. But that is not the case.”

Pashinyan believes the two sides should resolve the issue through cooperation and close this chapter. He said that in Bishkek, he and the Azerbaijani president also discussed stepping up joint efforts by the relevant commissions of the two countries.

—

Russia’s New Plan to Kill the Armenia-Azerbaijan TRIPP Corridor

The National Interest
Oct 8, 2026

After its preferred candidates lost election in Armenia earlier this year, Russia is implementing a new strategy against the trans-Caucasian economic corridor: whipping up fears of international conflict.

Having failed in their attempt to unseat Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in June, Russia’s allies in Armenia have turned their fire on the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP), the US-developed transit corridor passing through southern Armenia at the center of last year’s peace deal with Azerbaijan. Throughout September, pro-Russian parties, Kremlin-linked analysts, and revanchist nationalists in the country have worked from a common script: brand the project as Israeli, call on Iran to stop it, and convince the Armenian public that the corridor will cost them their sovereignty

This campaign is unlikely to derail TRIPP this year. Instead, it is aimed at the constitutional referendum Armenia must hold before the peace treaty can be signed. Washington should move faster than it can mature.

Is Iran Planning to Attack the TRIPP Corridor? Iran Doesn’t Think So

The Israeli label is the newest line of attack. On September 18, former Armenian prime minister Khosrov Harutyunyan wrote in the pro-Russian newspaper Golos Armenii that TRIPP bears an “Israeli trace”—describing the corridor as a plan conceived in Israel and merely presented as American, and suggesting that talk of it began at the height of the confrontation among Iran, Israel, and the United States. Historian Armen Ayvazyan has described Azerbaijan’s government as fully dependent on the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel, implying that Armenia’s would head in a similar direction if the TRIPP were left intact. The security analyst Hrachya Arzumanyan went further on Telegram, alleging that “world Jewry” had been collectively responsible for Armenia’s loss of Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan in 2023 and vowing to remind them of it “for the next two thousand years.” The label turns a 42-kilometer road and rail line into a front in the Iran war, which makes Tehran a party to it and discredits the project with anyone hostile to Israel.

Iran is the constituency this campaign most wants to mobilize. Vigen Akopyan, the managing partner of the Russian news agency EADaily, wrote on September 22 that the US and Israel had been trying to seal Iran off from every direction, and that TRIPP would turn Armenia’s southern Syunik province into a battleground between Washington and Tehran. Tigran Torosyan, a former speaker of parliament, called the route an American base under another name, one Iran “cannot allow.” Ayvazyan likewise declared Syunik Iran’s “red line,” and Sergey Melkonyan of the Applied Policy Research Institute (APRI) in Armenia suggested Tehran could respond as it did in March, when Iranian drones struck Azerbaijan’s Nakhchivan exclave. Indeed, former Iranian foreign minister Ali Akbar Velayati warned in August 2025 that the route would become a graveyard for “Trump’s mercenaries.”

Yet Iran has not made a credible threat to the TRIPP project. Its ambassador in Yerevan, Khalil Shirgholami, has distinguished TRIPP from the Azerbaijani corridor concept Iran long opposed and says Tehran has no reason to object absent a foreign security or military presence. Iran also has few resources with which to act against Armenia; it is under US naval blockade, its oil exports have all but stopped, and its airlines have been barred from Azerbaijan under new US aviation sanctions since late September. The revanchists in Yerevan are trying to draw red lines that Tehran itself does not appear committed to. 

How Russia Has Stoked Anti-TRIPP Activism

The domestic message is loss of sovereignty. Gohar Meloyan of Samvel Karapetyan’s Strong Armenia party claims 74 percent of the route’s revenue will go to America. The reality is more complicated; the framework Washington and Yerevan announced in January gives the United States a 74 percent stake in a joint development company for an initial 49 years, but the route runs under Armenian law.

This subtlety has been lost in the commentary surrounding the route. Ruben Melkonyan, dean of oriental studies at Yerevan State University, has called TRIPP a road Armenia will host but never control. Levon Zurabyan of the Armenian National Congress, the party of former President Levon Ter-Petrosyan and once the most pragmatic voice on Azerbaijan in Armenian politics, warned it would provoke a proxy war. The analyst Vahe Davtyan implausibly claimed that the corridor had set Armenia against the European Union—even as Brussels has committed €10 billion ($11.2 billion) to the same Middle Corridor TRIPP will feed. Akopyan states the conclusion outright: Armenia can survive only in alliance with Russia and in strategic dialogue with Iran.

It is impossible to miss Russia’s ties to the anti-TRIPP narrative. These voices appear regularly on Russian-owned or Russian-aligned outlets such as EADaily, Sputnik Armenia, 168.am, and Golos Armenii, and they build on a state campaign. Before the June election, independent analysts claimed that in the run-up to Armenia’s elections, the Russian-backed “Matryoshka” propaganda network had published 343 fake videos by early May. The previous year, the Storm-1516 propaganda operation targeted Armenia more than any other country in the world. Moscow has used blunt instruments of coercion as well, threatening to cancel the agreement under which it supplies Armenia’s gas; the members of the Eurasian Economic Union will also convene in December to discuss suspending Armenia’s membership. 

A second front has opened in Washington, where Armenian lobbying efforts to enforce human rights sanctions against Azerbaijan may torpedo the peace process. On September 14 and 15, the Armenian National Committee of America held more than 150 meetings on Capitol Hill, pressing lawmakers to enforce Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act and to sign a letter opposing the administration’s extension of its waiver. There is no reason to believe that this effort is coordinated with Moscow. Even so, cutting assistance to Azerbaijan and reviving a 1992 sanction would strip away the leverage that brought Baku to the table, and endanger an enduring peace agreement.

Russia Is Losing the TRIPP Battle—but It Will Have More Chances

For now, this campaign is losing. Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party won 49.8 percent of the vote in June—just shy of an outright majority, but far surpassing Strong Armenia’s 23.3 percent, despite one of the largest Russian influence operations on record. Russia is tied down in Ukraine, and Iran is under blockade. On September 23, representatives of more than 40 companies came to New York to look at TRIPP, accompanied by Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT), and representatives from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and all five “C5” Central Asian nations. The administration has put $201 million into a Trans-Caspian Enterprise Fund.

Pashinyan has held through all of it, and he will probably hold again. His voters are the softer target. Three decades of conflict left the two societies with no trust to spend, and a claim repeated into that vacuum for eighteen months could change public opinion, forcing a shift in policy.

The danger to TRIPP lies in the future timeframe. Azerbaijan will not sign the peace treaty until Armenia removes its territorial claim to Nagorno-Karabakh from its constitution. Armenian voters will need to approve that change in a referendum expected in 2027. Meanwhile, the feasibility study for the route is not due until the end of this year or early next, and the joint development company has yet to be formally launched. Every claim now in circulation, from the Israeli plot to the Iranian red line to the foreign base in Syunik, is an argument for voting no. It will carry more weight if Russia and Iran have recovered some of their strength by then.

Washington can do much to close this gap. It should formally launch the development company and name its leadership, and begin visible work and hiring in Syunik before the referendum, so that voters judge the route by jobs rather than rumors.  

Russia and Iran are weaker today than they have been in a generation, and both will recover. The United States should hope that the road is under construction—and the permanent peace treaty signed—before they do.

Joseph Epstein is the director of the Turan Research Center, a senior fellow at the Yorktown Institute, an expert at the N7 Foundation, and a research fellow at the Begin Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar Ilan University. He also sits on the advisory board of the Alekain Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to providing education to women and girls in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. He specializes in Eurasia and the Middle East, and his work has been featured in various outlets such as Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, The Hill, the Atlantic Council, Novaya Gazeta, RFE/RL, Foreign Policy, and others.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/silk-road-rivalries/russias-new-plan-to-kill-the-armenia-azerbaijan-tripp-corridor

—

Armenia and the Task of Remembering

The Catholic Thing
Oct 9, 2026

—

Iran is now ‘satisfied’ with Trump Route, Armenia Foreign Minister says

OC Media
Oct 8, 2026
Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan told parliament that Iran is ‘satisfied’ with the ‘entire’ Trump Route process. Mirzoyan says this apparent positive response, which comes after Tehran has repeatedly and publicly voiced concern, was clear to him after a recent visit.

The Trump Route, also known by its official name, the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP), agreed upon by Armenia and Azerbaijan with US mediation, would connect Azerbaijan to its exclave Nakhchivan through Armenian territory. Iran has previously voiced concerns about the project’s plans to put US military close to Iran’s border and possible threats to Armenia’s territorial integrity. During talks with his visiting Armenian counterpart Mirzoyan on Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated Tehran’s concerns over the planned opening of a US-run transit corridor through Armenia.

After Mirzoyan returned from a two-day official visit to Iran, MP Arusyak Manavazyan asked him in parliament on Wednesday about his visit to Iran and Iran’s perceptions of the Trump Route. During his visit on Monday, Mirzoyan met with Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, as well as Araghchi.

‘Iran is satisfied with the entire process surrounding TRIPP: with the perfect transparency we have shown, with our readiness to discuss all questions, and also with the economic opportunities that the launch of this same infrastructure will give Iran itself’, said Mirzoyan.

In response to a question about cargo and air transportation, Mirzoyan emphasised Armenia’s readiness to strengthen relations with Iran despite the international sanctions. He added that relations with Iran are deeply valued and will ‘not be put at risk.’

In September, Iran’s ambassador to Armenia said that Iran has no objection to the Trump Route project if it fully respects Armenia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and does not result in an American military or security presence in the region.

—