What is the price of sovereignty?

During our time on this earth, there are experiences in service to others that are worthy of our commitment. I would define them as our Lord, our family and our nation. The first is defined as establishing a relationship through Jesus Christ that gives meaning to our lives and encourages us to serve others as we prepare for eternity. Our families are the gift God has given us to live our earthly lives. We are brought into this world with parents, we evolve into becoming parents and with His grace become grandparents. Along the way, we are blessed with a multitude of people we call family. It gives us joy, and at times challenges, but always an identity. The last area is the most “earthly” of our service areas. We often refer to a nation as the umbrella for those of a common culture, ethnicity or religion. For stateless people, it can be a global concept; for nations with a diaspora, it takes on a territorial and global existence. In the long and tumultuous history of the Armenians, we have experienced almost every version  of nationhood. Armenia existed for centuries as a nation governed by a monarchy or feudal states. Armenia has also experienced substantial time as a subjugated nation existing within a larger multi-nation state, such as an empire. In recent centuries, democracies have emerged where a representative government elected by its citizens is the public face of the nation. Armenia has had two such experiences in the last 100 years and is now in the 32nd year of the current republic. Whether a monarchy or a democratic republic, they were sovereign states.

For independent and free nations, the term sovereignty is frequently associated with the freedom of a nation state. It generally refers to the ability of a state to self-govern, define its territory and attend to its own matters. Sovereignty is usually earned through military conflicts, such as the United States Revolutionary War that started in 1775, or as a result of the collapse of a previous subjugating power, such as the Soviet Union. It was the latter that enabled the creation of the current Republic of Armenia. In either circumstance, it occurs through the sacrifice of many, and therefore is usually vigorously defended when under threaten. There are circumstances where nations defend their sovereignty because they have lived through the alternative: oppression. Such is the case of Artsakh. I have often felt that because Armenia and Artsakh secured their sovereignty in different manners, their intensity in defending sovereignty differs. Certainly, there are many citizens of Armenia who understand the fragility of sovereignty, but there are also many who are removed from the crisis. Walking through the streets of Yerevan is a significant contrast to Berdzor or Stepanakert.

Given the diversity of our global Armenian nation, it is natural that there are varying perspectives on its impact and the level of commitment to be invested. Some are willing to sacrifice freedom in exchange for stability. I will always remember an incident I experienced in 2011 in Armenia. We were touring the museum in Sardarabad, which is the symbol of sacrifice and sovereignty for Armenians. Sardarabad in 1918 was when Armenians collectively drew a line in the sand and declared their intention to stop the Turkish genocidal advance or perish in the process. They were unwilling to accept subjugation and further atrocities. The Catholicos in Holy Etchmiadzin was encouraged to evacuate given the advance of the Turkish armies from the west and northwest. He refused by stating that if we cannot defend our land, then he will die there. During our tour, we were led by a very articulate woman who took us through the main exhibits and the special exhibits from the revolutionary period of 1915-20. During the course of our conversation, I expressed my joy about the establishment of an independent and sovereign Armenian state. Her response was shocking. She stated that her strong preference was to return to the “old days”… a not-so-subtle reference to the Soviet era. Her reasoning was that stability and employment were more important than sovereignty. She was unwilling to commit to the challenges of the democratization of Armenia and its transition to a market economy. She advocated a perspective where the price of sovereignty was too high. 

The western diaspora generally expresses strong feelings in support of the independence and self-governing of Armenia. I believe we can attribute this to two factors. The obvious one is that we all are usually a product of our environments, and most Armenians in the Americas and Europe were raised in democracies. It is natural for us to champion those principles for the homeland. It is interesting to note that a sovereign nation is not necessarily a democratic one, but in modern times we tend to package them together. A sovereign nation has the freedom of self-governing, while democracy is one system of self governance. In the past, monarchies were sovereign but hardly democratic. The other reason for this approach in the diaspora has to do with the patriotic feeling sustained over the decades that has contributed to our identity. When thousands of Armenians in the diaspora have a picture of Ararat on their walls, it represents the dream of a united and sovereign nation. The fervor over the unpunished crime of genocide is manifested in reparations of territory and financial compensation for the atrocities committed. The question remains, however: What is the level of credibility of the diaspora towards Armenia’s sovereignty? They don’t live there and those with part-time residences are perceived as an Armenian version of “snowbirds” in Florida. There are those who have received Armenian dual citizenship, but the vast majority of the diaspora expresses its views from a distance. Many Armenians in the homeland appreciate the patriotic _expression_ and support from the diaspora but recognize the limitations of their impact. In the thirty-plus years of Armenia’s sovereignty, we have collectively failed to define the integration of all those who care for Armenia – both in the homeland and the diaspora. Within Armenia, one can gain vastly different perspectives from urban dwellers in Yerevan versus the border village residents. When you live on the border facing those who are committed to your destruction, you gain a very fundamental perspective on freedom and sovereignty. It is about the land that generations have lived on. It represents one of the most apolitical forms of patriotism. For these people, the sacrifice index is high because it represents their way of life. Our brethren in Artsakh represent the purest understanding of the price of sovereignty. After the 2020 war, there was no mass migration out of Artsakh.

The vast majority of the approximately 45,000 displaced during the war returned to Artsakh. They are strong, resilient and inspiring. Their perspective on sovereignty is about the quality of their lives. It is not an academic discussion. It is a challenge every day.

Davit Bek, Syunik region, 2020 (Photo: Jonathan Alpeyrie)

Armenia and Artsakh have a crisis of sovereignty today. We all understand the risks to Artsakh, but Armenia’s border security represents an equal risk. In my view, we cannot negotiate for sovereignty. If Armenia exists with a foreign presence, no foreign policy, economic dependency and porous borders, its sovereignty will be lost. It will be a vassal state. Perhaps this is what Armenians want – a big brother protector that will manipulate its future. If Armenia wants sovereignty, it must understand that it cannot be won through appeasement. Sacrificing Artsakh will not quench the thirst of the Turkish alliance with its pan-Turkic revivalism. Yes, we need friends we can count on, but in parallel we need to demonstrate our resolve. Mixed messages from various Armenian quarters does not enable that objective. Bold moves are needed to optimize our resources and prevent confusion.

The Armenian government should declare a national political amnesty and build a unity government. A small nation divided in a dangerous neighborhood must avoid internal conflict. The church, as the most important non-governmental institution, should be visible and vocal to advocate for our people. We need more activities like the reported efforts of Archbishop Bagrat, Primate in Tavush. The “security and rights” plan for Artsakh needs details and must be a red line. Currently it feels like no one is listening. Aliyev’s strategy is simple and predictable. Satisfy the diplomatic community in the West with lies and apply military pressure when he doesn’t get his way. Now he is attempting to collude with Russia over the “Zangezur” violation of Armenian sovereignty. Our recovery starts with a unified Armenia (plenty of room for improvement) and positions that display strength and a defense of our sovereignty. Allowing Aliyev to find a map that adds credence to his incursions into Armenia should be met with firm resistance. 

Before we offer any compromise, remember two things: Aliyev will not change his aggression with concessions, and the West wants a “peace deal” regardless of the impact on Armenia. Their tolerance of the criminal behavior of Aliyev is all you need to know. They are pushing the “deal” ahead of any compromise from Aliyev because their objective is to weaken Russia and not necessarily provide any security for Armenia. This peace process is playing with the sovereignty of Armenia. If the result of this process redefines the border of Armenia with territorial losses, allows a corridor that cuts off Syunik (the real goal of Aliyev) and ignores the rights of our brethren in Artsakh, we have not only failed but have lost our sovereignty. The price for our sovereignty is high. It always has been. Think about the patriots gathered for a blessing at Holy Etchmiadzin before Sardarabad. I think they understood the price. Vartan and Ghevont Yeretz understood the price. Our inspiring people in Artsakh clearly understand it too. My father used to say that nothing of value happens without sacrifice. That sacrifice may not be loss of life, but also financial and other forms of commitment. It may also mean that we subordinate our egos, forgive and stand together. Is that a price we are willing to pay?

Columnist
Stepan was raised in the Armenian community of Indian Orchard, MA at the St. Gregory Parish. A former member of the AYF Central Executive and the Eastern Prelacy Executive Council, he also served many years as a delegate to the Eastern Diocesan Assembly. Currently , he serves as a member of the board and executive committee of the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR). He also serves on the board of the Armenian Heritage Foundation. Stepan is a retired executive in the computer storage industry and resides in the Boston area with his wife Susan. He has spent many years as a volunteer teacher of Armenian history and contemporary issues to the young generation and adults at schools, camps and churches. His interests include the Armenian diaspora, Armenia, sports and reading.


Reunion with My Armenian DP Camp Playmate

“Armenian grief is a sea…
In that dark expanse drifts my soul…
In the sea of Armenian sorrows—
My soul languishes evermore.”     

Hovhaness Tumanyan, 1903
Armenian poet and writer (1869-1923)

Hans, Knarik and Anusch at the airport upon the author’s arrival

At last, our flight from Chicago to Germany had reached its destination. My daughter Hasmik and I had arrived in Munich, known as the “cosmopolitan city with heart,” and home to the Rathaus-Glockenspiel, a huge, ornate clock that “chimes and re-enacts two stories from the 16th century…”  Munich, which was heavily bombed during World War II, is also known for its Oktoberfest and beer. As we quickly walked through the jet bridge, Hasmik whispered, “Mom, I can’t wait to meet Anusch!” As she said those words, I grew even more excited to at last see Anusch, my DP (Displaced Persons) camp childhood playmate, again. At the terminal gate, a large group of people were waiting for either family, friends or acquaintances. Among them were Anusch and her husband Johannes, Hansi or Hans for short. We hugged each other tightly, again and again. After our greetings and hugs, Anusch being my “senior” by a couple of months, grabbed my hand and squeezed it firmly, as if to say, “We will never lose each other again!” Having collected our luggage, we walked out of the airport with Hans and Anusch pulling our suitcases behind them (they would not allow us to do it) and down the stairs to catch the train to our hotel, only a 20-minute ride away. And from there, it was another 20-minute bus ride to the Bavarian town of Ludwigsfeld at Dachau, located “on the grounds of the largest former Outer-Camp of the Dachau Concentration Camp, then called KZ-Ausenlager (Outer Camp), Allach 1. The outer or subcamps were the outlying detention centers that came under the command of a main concentration camp run by the SS in Nazi Germany and German occupied Europe.”

A view of the partial remains of the Outer Camp of the Dachau Concentration Camp from Anusch’s dining room window. The plaque on the wall reads: “In memory of the many thousand prisoners of the Dachau KZ-Outer Camp of the Dachau Concentration Camp, Allach…who had to work there…”

As we stepped down from the bus, Anusch explained, “The grounds in this wooded area are where countless displaced persons after World War II had been interned.” As we continued walking and chatting, Anusch and Hans announced as one, “Come, our home is just over there!” As we got closer to their apartment building, I noticed sneakers, in a variety of sizes, hanging like ornaments from the limbs of a nearby tree. We all chuckled. No doubt the amusing sight had been playful pranks by some of the kids in the area. As we stopped for a moment to gaze about and at the dangling shoes, Anusch further explained, “After the war, this settlement or estate as it is also called, was built in 1952 as a Displaced Persons camp by the American Marshall Plan, ‘an initiative for foreign aid to Western Europe following World War II.’” 

“This area,” Anusch continued as she pointed here and there, “consists of 32 blocks of apartments on the outer grounds of the Dachau Concentration Camp. My parents moved into our 50-square-meter, three-room apartment, with separate toilet, on 3 January 1953. We felt blessed! Our youngest brother still lives in the apartment where he was born sixty-five years ago. They named the streets here with names such as diamond, ruby, crystal, etc., in order to cover up the grim past. The estate is situated in an isolated area on the outskirts of Munich. One of the reasons for this is because when the DPs were brought to this location, ninety-percent of them were ill. About seventy-percent had tuberculosis, ten-percent suffered from psychological illnesses and venereal disease, and another ten-percent had other problems.” Anusch added, “The ‘Siedlung Ludwigsfeld,’ as it is now called, is a very special place. To this day, former DPs come to visit from all over the world. Also, American relatives of the former slave-workers of the Outer Concentration Camp come regularly on the day of Liberation on 30 April (1945). Recently, our American friend Nick, a 99-year-old survivor from California, came here with his family, and we all had breakfast at our home.”

Anusch and Knarik taking a walk in her neighborhood

From the moment we greeted one another and held hands at the airport, and for the entire week we were there, the two of us, wherever we went, were inseparable—tightly holding hands as we walked about. There were moments that I felt as if we were back at the Waidmannsdorf Lager C, DP Camp, Armenian Section, in Klagenfurt, Austria, exploring our world in our little high-top shoes, hand-made dresses, at times wearing an apron over our dresses to keep them clean. Our world back then was of destruction, homelessness and hopelessness; cruelty, fear and despair; separation and loss; hunger, illness, disease and death—the ugly aftermaths of war. But, in that same world, oftentimes there was also something wonderous to discover—a worm, an insect, a bird, a butterfly, an ant hill, a patch of wild flowers, even an occasional cat or dog. Most importantly, though, wherever our little feet carried us on the campgrounds, we found an abundance of affection in the form of smiles, hugs and kisses from the adults, both male and female, in our camp, whom we addressed in German as either “Onkel” or “Tante” (Uncle or Auntie), as they would reach for us—two little two-year-old toddlers curiously and carefreely roaming about. Joyfully, tenderly, Onkel or Tante would lift us into their arms and carry us, like precious little gems, back to our makeshift shacks. For Anusch, there was an additional discovery she had made during one of our great outdoor adventures, and something she greatly prized—my mother’s metal pail. Whenever it disappeared, my mother Olga knew exactly where to look for it. Grinning as she would step out of our shack, my mother would call out in her Austrian-German, sweet and lilting voice, “Where is my pail?” There, a short distance away, she would find little Anusch busily stirring mud porridge in the pail.

Knarik holding a cat (left), “Uncle” Zorik carrying Anusch on his shoulder and holding a dog

In one of the photos that Anusch showed me, there were the two of us with one of the Armenian DPs in the camp, whose name was Zorik, and a cat and dog. It was a photo I had never seen before, and it reminded me of Hovhaness Tumanyan’s poem titled “The Dog and the Cat.” My father would often read that poem to me in Armenian, one of my favorites growing up. I asked Anusch who the photographer was and she said, “My father loved photography and sometimes he would take the pictures, sometimes it would be someone else. They would develop the photos themselves.”

The people, such as the Hayastantsi (from Armenia) men in the camp, had experienced and survived hell in their Soviet “Haven of Brotherhood.” Some had also lost their families and had no one, while others never had a chance to start a family. Zorik was one of those DPs who had no family. That is why for those men every child in the camp was precious, and it brought them joy to be a part of their lives. For that reason, we little ones of the camp had many eyes dotingly watching over us. My father, Suren Hakopjani Hovhanessian, would not only tell me, but had written about life “Under Stalin’s ‘Happy’ Sun.” One day, as he and I talked about those bleak days in Europe, he pensively described his innermost feelings, which he rarely did—in particular, how he felt nearly every waking moment as a POW.  “Words,” he said, “cannot adequately express the constant terror and anticipation of forced repatriation to the Soviet Union at any moment…and there, immediately shot to death.” This horrific thought was what he and his fellow Armenian POWs, some of whom, among them my father, were also slave laborers, constantly lived with. Unfortunately, the men that trustingly did “repatriate,” against the pleading, the imploring of their fellow POWs, were promptly shot to death as traitors to Stalin’s “Haven of Brotherhood.”  When I had asked my father about camp life, he said, “Life in the camps, though the conditions were dreadful, unimaginable, it was still better than life under Stalin and in his prisons. In the camps there was at least a glimmer of hope, while over there, in Stalin’s ‘Happy Life Country,’ not so.” 

Knarik’s parents (left) holding her at the DP camp in Austria, and Anusch being held by one of the DP camp couples

In a published photo Anusch showed me, the description stated that the POWs, who were also slave laborers, were fenced in a muddy and dirty area in certain places and given the scarcest of food. For their amusement, the commanders would, at times, toss stale and moldy bread at the POWs. Those who were quick enough to grab the bread devoured it as others, with arms pleadingly extended, watched on. In a 1945 photo, the bones of slave laborers had been piled in a high mound to either be burned or buried. And, in an artist’s drawing, the depiction of British soldiers brutalizing and callously forcing the POWs to return to the Soviet Union was heartrending to look at. Some escaped the clutches of the soldiers, while others were driven to their deaths. “After the war,” Anusch then explained, “everyone—the people and the DPs alike—was starving.”

Though Anusch’s birthday was just a couple of months before mine, she was much smaller that I was due to severe malnutrition and poor health. As a result, her growth was stunted and as an adult, she is an extremely petite woman. During the time we lived in the Austrian DP camp, she remained with her parents, while I was often sent away to live with kind strangers who cared for me as their own. In France, and then in the German DP camp called Funkerkaserne, near Stuttgart, Germany, I was again put into the care of kind strangers for a period. The reasons for such arrangements during those days were either because both parents had to work or they would not receive food rations (Hitler’s orders), or one or both parents had tuberculosis. My father had contracted tuberculosis when he and fellow POWs were first brought to Europe and was treated. Later, when my parents married, my mother contracted typhoid. The people in the camp suffered greatly from malnutrition and disease. Everyone, no matter their age, was sprayed from time to time with DDT. Food was so scarce that sometimes children would eat grass to fool their empty little bellies. Anusch, at times, would tell her father, “I am not hungry, so I will go out and play,” and then promptly search for grass to eat. Since my father was a POW and slave laborer, and my mother was a nurse in the nearby hospital, they both had to work and therefore were unable to care or provide for me. There were a great many such cases after World War 2. In Anusch’s case, she and her brothers Arshak and Georg were eventually sent to live elsewhere for periods of time in order to receive proper nutrition and regain their health, to a degree. As a grown woman and mother of five, grandmother of ten, and great-grandmother of four, the soft-spoken and petite Anusch is a natural storyteller with a remarkable memory for details.

As we would sit at her dining room table during our time together, Anusch would tell me of her childhood in Austria, and later in Germany. Her eyes would grow misty as she would speak of her parents, especially her father and some of the other Armenian DPs, along with their non-Armenian wives, who would sometimes stop by their home for a visit. She would describe how after chatting with one another, sparks of nostalgia and longing would spur the men to their feet to sing and dance, just as they had done a lifetime ago in their homes in their beloved Hairenik (Fatherland). The wives would join in the fun by clapping and singing the Armenian songs the best they could, while one of the men would beat on a metal pot, keeping perfect rhythm to the claps and voices that blended as one and reverberated throughout their living quarters.

As I listened to Anusch recollect those early days, I thought, though they all had little, suffered greatly, and lost so much, they had each other and that was enough.

On our first day at Anusch’s home, we sat down to a dinner of dolma, just the way my mother had learned to make it from my father, with delicately spiced meat carefully wrapped in cabbage leaves and cooked in tomato broth. Though Anusch said that she did not think her cooking was good, Hasmik, Hans and I disagreed. It was delicious, and it reminded me of home when I was a child and the times I spent in

Armenia! Anusch and I would spend hours discussing the topic of the Armenian DPs at the camp and after, while Hans would occasionally play Armenian folk music or the music of Gomidas on the record player, while he either read in the living room or sat with us at the dining room table. “From the moment I heard Armenian music in Anusch’s father’s home many, many years ago,” Hans said as he put down his newspaper, “it captured my heart!” and then affectionately glanced at Anusch. (It is the same kind of music that played in my parents’ home when I was growing up, and then in the home my late husband Murad and I had made together.) Though Hans is German, he has learned a little Armenian, knows the history well, and is involved, along with Anusch, in various Armenian activities. Armenian folk music, Han’s favorite, is often played in their home. And once, when we were preparing to visit some of their children and their families in the neighborhood, he smiled as he called out to hurry his wife in the other room, “Haydeh, Anusch!” Truly, the spirit of an Armenian home created under the most difficult circumstances by Anusch’s father, and mother, is continued by his children and grandchildren. 

Hans reading in his living room as he listens to Armenian music

Anusch’s dining room, which overlooks part of the Dachau Outer Camp with its many dreadful stories, and later, the heartbreaking stories about some of the DPs that made their home in the settlement, I was again reminded of our early days in the DP camps my parents and I called home for awhile, and then our early immigrant days in Chicago. Some of the DPs in Chicago would occasionally gather in our small duplex on Saturday evenings to catch up on the latest news from Armenia and play chess or backgammon, while the women congregated in the kitchen over cups of coffee and my mother’s Viennese apple strudel. Over the years, as I listened to my father’s stories, and that of other Armenian DPs, I both admired and was amazed by them for their courage and determination to carry on, despite the horrors and severe deprivations they had suffered and the difficulties that followed for years afterward. And of my mother, and the other non-Armenian wives of the Armenian DPs, I have always had a special place in my heart for them because of the things they too suffered, both growing up in their homelands and during and after the terrible war years, and later the hardships they had to overcome in a new country. I particularly admired and appreciated how my mother, and some of the other wives, had encouraged their children to follow the traditions of their Armenian fathers. 

In Anusch and Hans’ family, their daughter Rebeka is taking Armenian language courses, and granddaughter Hannah Araxie, who attends Catholic University (Faculty of History and Social Sciences) in Germany, has written a research paper titled “Diaspora Armenian’s Collective Memory of the Distant Homeland: Genocide, Diaspora and the Theory of Collective Memory.” One of Anusch and Hans’ sons, Sevan, whose wife is German, has a nine-year-old daughter named Nora. Every evening, before bedtime, Nora asks her mother to read yet another story (in German) by Hovhaness Tumanyan. 

Over another cup of tea and Armenian pastry prepared by Nina, Anusch’s friend and neighbor, who was from Armenia (when Nina and her family moved to Germany several years ago, they learned of Anusch’s special neighborhood, and soon after, Nina, her husband and two children moved to the settlement), Anusch began to talk about her father. “My father, Malchas Krmadjian, was born in Javakhk, Georgia, but his forefathers had been from Garin (Erzerum). Malchas was married at 18, and his bride was 14. They had 10 children. One day, as he was working in his field, he was snatched by soldiers and forced to serve in the Soviet Russian Army, where he was assigned to the Cavalry. In 1941, he was captured by the Germans and given an ultimatum: ‘Join the German Cavalry or be sent to a concentration camp!’ He chose the former. He had served first in the Russian Cavalry for five years and later in the German Cavalry for four years. As a result of his years in the Cavalry, he sustained severe wounds that plagued him throughout his life. Always missing his family in Javakhk, and haunted by the things he saw and experienced during the war and after, he eventually grew extremely depressed. Encouraged to begin a new life in Germany by his Armenian DP friends, since the country was now their home, slowly he did just that, but always there was a longing for the home and family he was forced to leave behind and the realization that he would never see them again. Upon meeting a young German girl, Margarete, who would become his wife, for there were no Armenian girls in Austria or Germany at that time, he started a new family and learned a new language – German – though haltingly, besides the Armenian and Turkish that he knew.” Anusch somberly looked away for a second and then continued, “Before my father’s death of a heart attack, he said to us, ‘Listen my children, I have lived for 60 years, but it feels like 120.’ We all cried and repeated over and over, ‘Papa, don’t die, don’t die!’”

A part of Malchas’s story reminded me of a Hayastantsi who had lost his leg in the war and lived with us in Chicago for a while in our small, three-bedroom duplex that had one bathroom, a living room, dining room and kitchen. Though we were cramped, my parents felt it was their duty to help fellow Hayastantsis, who had even less than we had. And so, my parents, four siblings and I slept in one bedroom; the Armenian who had lost his leg slept in the other; and later, a poverty-stricken family from Armenia – a father, mother and child – who came to live with us, slept in the third bedroom. Though we lived in cramped quarters and had little, we never felt poor because of our parents, who themselves grew up in great hardship. My father, who was from the village of Shvanidzor in Syunik, and located in Armenia’s southern region, was a toddler when his father passed away from pneumonia, and by age nine, his young mother, who, carrying a bucket of water up the hill to their house dropped dead when she heard the frantic and dreaded words, “The Turks are coming! The Turks are coming!” Having to survive on his own since childhood, he knew the value of family, as did my mother. Remarkably, despite their harsh lives, my parents always remained generous, kind, optimistic and thankful. Since we, as a family, were all together, despite our circumstances, we were happy and felt fortunate to live in a country that offered such great freedom. 

One evening, the somber and quiet Armenian who had lost his leg told my father that he was going to end his life. My father immediately told my mother that he was going out for a walk with the man. Both returned late that night. Somehow, my father had convinced the dejected Armenian that he could not do what he was planning to do, that in time life would improve for him. When he eventually moved out of our home, his life had indeed taken a sunnier path, and the family of three had at last also found a better life in their adopted country of America. 

Anusch, Hans and his sister looking at copies of the Armenian Weekly the author brought with her

As Anusch and I talked and talked, stopping occasionally to look at the photos she had, and the ones I had on my phone, I realized how similar the two of us were in several ways, especially when it came to our love for all things Armenian. Perhaps that is why we bonded as toddlers, and now as adults. Having nearly finished with my interview, I asked Anusch what some of the nationalities in Ludwigsfeld were. She replied, “Armenian, Azeri, Belarus, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Chechen, Croatian, Georgian, Greek, Hungarian, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Slovenian, Tatar, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Uzbek.” And of the religions, she said, “We have Christians, among them Armenian Apostolic, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Evangelical, Lutheran, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and we have believers in the Jewish and the Muslim faiths.”

As I listened to Anusch describe her neighborhood, my old neighborhood in Chicago where we first settled came to mind. It was a neighborhood of local Americans and immigrants surrounded by factories and dotted with a few apartment buildings, and single homes, two flats and duplexes. Our international neighborhood then consisted of three Armenian families – two Hayastantsi and one from Turkey – several local American families, some of them elderly, a few Appalachian families, a Georgian family from the Caucasus, several German families, a few Italian families, a couple of Mexican families, a Polish family and a Russian family. Many of the men in the neighborhood, as well as a few of the women, worked in factories near and far. My father was more than happy to have his factory job, as did other Armenian immigrants, even though he had been a writer and teacher in Armenia. 

When my family and I moved to another part of Chicago during my teen years, and later, when we five siblings married, all but my late husband Murad and I, and our family, remained in the area that had become home since my family and I arrived in America many years ago. On the other hand, Anusch and Hans, and their children, now all married with families of their own, still live in the same neighborhood where Anusch’s parents first made their home, except for one daughter who lives not too far from her parents and family. A sense of unity and belonging that was a part of their lives growing up continues today, whereas our lives in the Chicagoland area have greatly changed over the years because of distance and relocations. 

Pictured from left to right at the reunion: the author’s daughter Hasmik, Anusch’s daughter Sarah, Knarik and Anusch

As Anusch and I continued our conversation on the DPs and their lives in Ludwigsfeld, it was apparent that Anusch’s life, and that of her family, was tightly woven with the lives of the other Armenian DPs who lived in the area. Over the years, however, many of them moved away to other cities in Germany or to other countries, leaving behind a neighborhood that had once been an example of “man’s Inhumanity to man” and hopelessness, but was eventually transformed into a place of hope with quiet, tree-lined streets, well-maintained buildings and grounds, and where children and youth play in open fields and adults gather regularly to spend time with one another or stroll about. When I asked Anusch if she considered herself to be German or Armenian, she replied with a smile, “I, the eldest of my father’s second marriage, consider myself an Armenian with a German mother, a German husband and a German passport!” Anusch then added, “After much searching, we found members of my father’s first marriage and now keep in touch with them. Though our Armenian is very limited, we are able to pass on our Armenian side as much as we can.”

Knarik, Anusch and Hans

Wanting to know a little of what Anusch and Hans’ adult children thought about the place they call home, Sarah, who moved away from Ludwigsfeld, described how she felt about life in the area that her parents, siblings and their families call home: “I live in a charming old town near the Danube, with my family, and commute to my workplace in Munich, near my childhood home. I frequently see my parents and the rest of the family. It makes me happy there. Although I felt embarrassed in the past to show others where I lived because the blocks of buildings looked a lot uglier in the past, and the area did not have the best reputation, meaning that it was referred to as the ‘foreigner’s place,’ and was viewed with contempt by a still-hostile neighborhood after World War II. I appreciate the close community we grew up in – all the different nationalities, but feeling close as brothers and sisters…As an adult, I have always been proud of the special place I came from…I see it as a treasure that I had a chance to grow up there with so much community life.” To add to community life, in particular the Armenian community, once a month the Armenians rent a church, St. Anne, in the middle of Munich, and an Armenian priest from another area comes to perform church service. Occasionally, the Armenians also gather to socialize with one another, a tradition they have kept since the early days in the settlement.  

Anusch (right) and Knarik going for a walk

My time with Anusch, and her lovely family, had ended. In the morning, Hasmik and I would be returning home. Though it was an evening touched with sadness because our time with one another had ended, the visit had given us a deeper insight into the history of that dark period in the lives of so many. Thankfully, there are pictures and accounts that say much about those days. In addition, the lives of two toddlers in an Austrian DP camp were captured in a few of the photos, along with the faces of some of the DPs. Without those photos, their stories may have been forgotten long ago. 

A few weeks after our return home, Anusch had written to me with additional information about her father and DP life. She ended her note with these words: “Well, dear Knarik, this is the story of only two displaced persons – our fathers. The reprisals that we, the descendants, had to go through, I will tell you another time…”

“…O falling star
Seen once from a bridge—:
Never to forget you. Stay standing! …”

Rainer Maria Rilke, 1915
Austrian poet and writer (1875-1926)

Knarik O. Meneshian was born in Austria. Her father was Armenian and her mother was Austrian. She received her degree in literature and secondary education in Chicago, Ill. In 1988, she served on the Selection Committee of the McDougal, Littell “Young Writers” Collection—Grades 1–8, an anthology of exemplary writing by students across the country.” In 1991, Knarik taught English in the earthquake devastated village of Jrashen (Spitak Region), Armenia. In 2002–2003, she and her late husband (Murad A. Meneshian), lived and worked as volunteers in Armenia for a year teaching English and computer courses in Gyumri and Tsaghgadzor. Meneshian’s works have been published in "Teachers As Writers, American Poetry Anthology" and other American publications, as well as Armenian publications in the U.S. and Armenia. Knarik is the author of A Place Called Gyumri: Life in the Armenian Mountains. She has also authored a book of poems titled Reflections, and translated from Armenian to English Reverend D. Antreassian’s book titled "The Banishment of Zeitoun" and "Suedia’s Revolt" She began writing at the age of 12 and has contributed pieces to The Armenian Weekly since her early teens.


The Hidden Place of Artsakh

Srbuhi Vanyan in her living room in Stepanakert with her working sketches and some completed works

“Your whole life, you set goals, work hard, create, and then there’s a war and now the blockade, which create monumental challenges that require doing the near-impossible to overcome them,” explains radio host-turned aspiring guesthouse manager Srbuhi Vanyan in her living room in Stepanakert. “It’s like trying to wring wood from a stone,” she repeats a folk saying in Artsakh.

Vanyan, 43, is a trained journalist who had been working in local radio for many years until she and her husband decided to launch Min Taqun Tegh (A Hidden Place), hoping to turn their old house into a guest house for rental income. The Vanyans’ vision was to create an authentic experience for Artsakh visitors, a cozy place where visitors can discover for themselves the beauty of Artsakh and gems hidden from most of the world. It would also be a place where visitors experience the Vanyans’ artwork.

Srbuhi Vanyan at her unfinished guest house in Stepanakert

But the war of 2020 left the guest house unfinished.

Vanyan compares the beauty of Artsakh with a panoramic picture. After the war, Vanyan took up painting and created handmade and applied art in the form of eco bags, tablecloths and decorative pillows that feature the local dialect and folklore motifs, in an effort to preserve elements of national identity. “I like to paint everything that is related to Artsakh,” she says. Since tourists can’t visit Artsakh now, she wants her buyers, who may never have the chance to visit, to have a piece of hidden Artsakh with them, in their homes.

However, the ongoing six-month blockade of Artsakh has hindered the growth of her small business. Due to the closure of the only road connecting Artsakh to Armenia and to the rest of the world, she cannot bring raw materials from Armenia, and the items sold online cannot be delivered to the buyers.

The endless queues are challenging for Vanyan as for almost everyone, but not only for getting necessary products. “We seem to have found ourselves at the lowest level of human needs. My customers are mostly women, who have higher needs such as being in the proximity of art, but today they have to think mainly about satisfying those basic needs,’’ says Vanyan.

The blockade has also been a personal challenge for Vanyan, because her family has been divided. Her husband is left without a job in Yerevan. Her elder daughter, who is studying in Yerevan, can’t return home either. 

Vanyan tries to take care of the family on both sides of the road. She is not afraid of these difficulties or the deprivation, because since the first war, they have survived many hardships.

“On the one hand, war hinders the opportunity to develop. On the other hand, it inspires creativity and resourcefulness,” she bitterly notes. “When I was a child, I cut my mother’s wedding dress and sewed a suit for myself. I sewed my brother’s torn shoes from an old school bag.”

After the war, Vanyan didn’t hesitate to return to Artsakh, a risky decision she admits may have been irrational: “Maybe we love this land too much.” But she also says that her dream and the collective desire of local Armenians is not something unusual—to continue one’s way of life, to simply exist. “I just want to have the opportunity to live together with my family, to create and move freely, but also to preserve our identity in our homeland, in our hidden place.” She wishes that this was not as seemingly impossible a task as wringing wood from a stone.

The blockade has had enormous consequences for Artsakh’s economy, which has not yet recovered from the 2020 war, putting it on the brink of a new crisis. 

In particular, the activity of the mining sector and large-scale agricultural activities have been  completely suspended. The construction of roads, tens of kilometers of water lines, irrigation systems for thousands of hectares of land and housing for displaced people from the occupied territories have all come to a halt.

During the blockade, foreign trade turnover was disrupted as well. Only humanitarian cargo has been imported through the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Russian peacekeeping force, mainly food and medicine, which is only eight-percent of the volume of goods imported into Artsakh before the blockade. An average of more than 200 tons of commodities used to be exported from Artsakh per day (mainly mining, food and textile industry products, alcoholic beverages), but now exports have completely halted.

According to the economic forecast, if the current situation remains unchanged, in 2023 the gross domestic product of Artsakh will decrease by more than 45-percent compared to the previous year.

As a result of all this, workers in all affected sectors face the threat of unemployment and many others have already lost their jobs. About 11,000 people have become unemployed, more than half of the employees in the private sector of the economy.

Siranush Sargsyan is a freelance journalist based in Stepanakert.


Landmark Congressional Commission hearing warns of second Armenian Genocide against Artsakh

Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission co-chairs Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) and Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) hosted the June 21st hearing on Artsakh security. Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) (left) offered powerful remarks and led insightful dialogue throughout the hearing.

WASHINGTON, DC – The Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission (TLHRC) held a landmark hearing spotlighting Azerbaijan’s escalating aggression against the indigenous Armenian Christians of Artsakh (Nagorno Karabakh), calling for sanctions against the Azerbaijani government in the face of a second Armenian Genocide taking place in the region, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

“Today’s hearing both reflected and reinforced the growing pro-Artsakh Congressional consensus in support of an urgent reset in US policy – starting with an end to all US military assistance to Azerbaijan,” stated ANCA executive director Aram Hamparian.  “The ANCA will continue to work with the broad coalition of faith-based, ethnic and human rights organizations and Congressional leaders to defend Artsakh’s right to security and self-determination.”

The two-hour Capitol Hill hearing was hosted by TLHRC co-chairs Chris Smith (R-NJ) and James McGovern (D-MA) and included remarks by Congressional Armenian Caucus co-chairs Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) and Frank Pallone (D-NJ).  Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) also submitted a written statement for the record. Titled “Safeguarding the people of Nagorno Karabakh,” the hearing included testimony by former US Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom Sam Brownback, former US Ambassador to Armenia John Evans, American Enterprise Institute Senior Fellow Michael Rubin, and Columbia University Director of the Peace-Building and Human Rights Program, Institute for the Study of Human Rights, David Phillips.

The hearing was livestreamed on the TLHRC’s YouTube channel.

The full proceedings were also streamed on the ANCA’s Facebook and Twitter channels.

Amb. Sam Brownback, Amb. John Evans, David Phillips and Michael Rubin (who participated remotely) called for concrete US action, including Azerbaijan sanctions, to prevent a second Armenian Genocide, during testimony offered at the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission hearing on Artsakh security.

“You’ve got 120,000 Christians that are being strangled, blockaded by Azerbaijan,” explained Amb. Brownback, who recently returned from a Philos Project-led fact-finding mission to Armenia.  “It’s against the peace agreement, it’s against what the International Court of Justice found, and yet it’s taking place. It’s being backed by Erdogan, who is probably the leading Islamist person in the world that’s pushing militant Islam.”  Amb. Brownback recommended the introduction of a Nagorno-Karabakh Human Rights Act, which would clearly identify the minimum standards to safeguard the security of Artsakh’s Armenian population. Amb. Brownback also called for a Congressional delegation visit to Artsakh, noting that he and his delegation were blocked from entering Artsakh last week. On US assistance to Azerbaijan, Amb. Brownback was adamant: “Unless Azerbaijan lifts that blockade, those Section 907 sanctions should be put in place by the President, by the Administration, and they ought to take place now if they will not lift this blockade.”

Michael Rubin, who also participated in the Philos Project Armenia fact-finding mission, was adamant about the implementation of US laws to sanction Azerbaijan – including Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support Act, the Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act and Magnitsky Act.  “President Aliyev has changed, and grown more erratic over the last decade. I’d say his trajectory is almost analogous to what we saw with Saddam Hussein,” explained Rubin.

Phillips was direct in his assessment of Azerbaijan’s genocidal intent against Artsakh’s Armenian population. “It is clear from Aliyev’s actions and his hate speech that a second Armenian Genocide is underway. The Erdogan regime is a full partner. It has equipped Azerbaijan with the tools to implement its Armenophobia,” stated Phillips. He went on to discuss the documentation project he had launched on Azerbaijani and Turkish atrocities against Artsakh, geared to preserve evidence to deter future crimes and hold perpetrators accountable.

“I think our task today is simply to consider how to preserve the lives of the Armenians in Karabakh in the face of a potentially genocidal threat,” explained Amb. Evans. “I certainly agree with the idea that the waiver of Section 907 ought to be rescinded.”  Amb. Evans went on to urge US diplomats to “put the brakes on Turkish and Israeli arms sales to Baku. All the other members of the Minsk Group, and Turkey is technically a member of that group, but all the others had basically agreed to preserve the military balance in the Caucasus. Now Russia, of course, played the biggest role as a supplier to both sides, but when Israeli and Turkish high-tech drones and other equipment got in there, not to mention the F-16s, this really upset the situation and has brought us to where we are.”

Rep. Chris Smith Announces Second Hearing on Artsakh Security

Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), seen here in discussions with ANCA staff and legislative fellows, announced that he would be hosting a second hearing on Artsakh security later this summer.

Rep. Chris Smith, during dialogue with TLHRC hearing witnesses about US efforts to address escalating Azerbaijani aggression, announced that he will soon be holding a second hearing – this time through the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Global Health, Global Human Rights & International Organizations, which he chairs – where US Administration officials would be invited to outline their efforts to address the Artsakh crisis.

In opening remarks in today’s hearing, Rep. Smith noted, “Since 2020, Azerbaijan has been tightening a noose on Nagorno-Karabakh. Its forces have occupied much of the former territory and even territory of Armenia proper. […] As our government is leading discussions with Azerbaijan and Armenia leaders, we in Congress have a responsibility to ask where is all of this headed. […] Our country simply cannot accept a risk of genocide or of ethnic cleansing of Nagorno-Karabakh.”

TLHRC co-chair Rep. McGovern offered an overview of the Artsakh crisis and Azerbaijan’s aggression, asserting, “The bottom line is that the Armenian population in Nagorno-Karabakh understandably feels vulnerable and at risk. So, what do we do about this? What is the pro-human rights response here? It is to ensure civilian protection, which means taking any and all actions we can to prevent further escalation of tensions that could lead to more war and new atrocities.” Rep. McGovern noted his co-sponsorship of the Anti-Blockade Resolution (H.Res.108), spearheaded by Rep. Pallone and Rep. Bilirakis, which condemns Azerbaijan’s Artsakh blockade, calls for cutting all military aid to Azerbaijan and expanding US aid to Artsakh. The bi-partisan measure currently has over 90 co-sponsors.

Rep. McGovern’s opening remarks are available here.

Rep. Bilirakis, who was among those chairing the commission hearing, stressed the importance of enforcing Section 907 restrictions on US aid to Azerbaijan. “I appreciate the testimony from this esteemed panel and the calls for an end to the Section 907 waiver of the FREEDOM Support Act, which would prohibit the sale of military equipment to Azerbaijan. You’re selling it to Azerbaijan; it’s just like selling it to Turkey. There’s no justifiable reason to continue this waiver when Azerbaijan has clearly used this equipment to wage an aggressive war against Armenia, commit war crimes against innocent Armenians and enforce the current blockade.” Rep. Bilirakis pledged to continue working with the Congressional Armenian Caucus to stop the Section 907 waiver “until the United States can guarantee that no American-bought resources will be used to perpetuate humanitarian crises, genocidal campaigns or target the innocent.”

Rep. Pallone, who submitted testimony for the record and offered remarks during the commission hearing, emphasized Azerbaijan’s genocidal intent in its ongoing aggression and blockade against Artsakh.  “Aliyev has not been subtle about alluding to the Armenian Genocide when discussing Artsakh and removing people from there, nor has he attempted to hide his ongoing deadly incursions into Armenian territory,” stated Rep. Pallone. “He is clearly taking premeditated steps to remove the indigenous Armenian population from Artsakh and deprive them of the opportunity to live freely, democratically and with dignity in the land of their ancestors – a clear sign of ethnic cleansing that we must not ignore.” Rep. Pallone noted that “it’s past time that the United States start better leveraging the diplomatic tools at our disposal, including sanctions, to finally bring this purposeful crisis to an end.” Citing reports of the continuation of Azerbaijan-Armenia talks in Washington, DC next week, Rep. Pallone stressed, “I call on the Administration to take every action necessary to prevent Azerbaijan’s militaristic behavior from dictating the terms of a final agreement, as that will not lead to an equitable, lasting peace in the region.”

In written testimony submitted to the TLHRC hearing, Rep. Schiff (D-CA) expressed deep concern that “Artsakh has been used as a bargaining chip in the peace talks, without any representation.” He stressed that “it is the right of the people of Artsakh to live free of political, cultural and economic oppression, and as a protector of democracy, the United States must continue to support and stand with the people of Artsakh to achieve the recognition it deserves among all nations.” Rep. Schiff outlined a series of steps the US must take to safeguard human rights in Artsakh, including imposing sanctions on Azerbaijan and ensuring “the protection and right to self-determination of the people of Artsakh.”

Rep. Schiff’s full statement is available here.
The ANCA will be providing additional coverage of the TLHRC hearing on Artsakh security in the upcoming days.
Amb. Sam Brownback with the ANCA’s Alex Galitsky and Nareg Aghjayan and ANCA Leo Sarkisian, Maral Melkonian, and Hovig Apo Saghdejian Capital Gateway Program summer fellows, after offering powerful testimony during the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission hearing on Artsakh security.
The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) is the largest and most influential Armenian-American grassroots organization. Working in coordination with a network of offices, chapters and supporters throughout the United States and affiliated organizations around the world, the ANCA actively advances the concerns of the Armenian American community on a broad range of issues.


RI Road Race to honor Kerrie Dolbashian

Kerrie Dolbashian

SMITHFIELD, R.I.—Gary Menissian of Ocean State Multisport has organized a road race in memory of Kerrie Dolbashian, whose life was tragically cut short last May.

Born in Providence, Kerrie was the daughter of Paul and Lisa M. (Read) Dolbashian, parishioners at Sts. Vartanantz Armenian Apostolic Church. She was also the sister of Michelle Dolbashian and Anthony Arakel Dolbashian and his wife Chelsea. Dolbashian worked as a CNA at Miriam Hospital in Providence and was to start the nursing program at CCRI in the fall of 2022. She was honored by the hospital as a Jet Blue Covid Warrior.

A childhood friend of Dolbashian’s father Paul, Menissian decided to name the race in Kerrie’s honor.  

The Kerri “D” Sour Apple Running Festival – Half Marathon / 5k will start and finish at Deerfield Park in Smithfield on Sunday, July 9. The half marathon course is set in the countryside with limited traffic and is certified by the USATF. 

According to the race information, the half marathon is a little hilly with the last two miles being downhill or flat. The 5k is also a little hilly with a downhill finish. The race will be chip timed, and all online registrants will receive a t-shirt and a finishers medal. There will be a four-hour time limit for the half marathon.

During the race, there will be seven water stations on the half marathon course and one water stop on the 5k. Two porta-potties will be available on the half marathon course.

All participants will receive a medal with trophies for the overall male/female in the half marathon and the 5k.

Packet pickup is Saturday, July 8, from 8-10 a.m. at the Seekonk YMCA and on race day starting at 6 a.m. In order to receive a race day t-shirt, participants must register online before June 29. Race day registration will be available from 6:30-7:45 a.m. with a start time of 8 a.m.

At the request of Dolbashian’s parents, a portion of the proceeds from the race will be distributed evenly between AYF Camp Haiastan and the Armenian National Committee of RI.




Eastern Prelacy announces schedule for October Pontifical visit

Catholicos Aram I and His Eminence Archbishop Anoushavan Tanielian with children at St. Hagop Church in Niagara Falls

NEW YORK—The Eastern Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church announced last Thursday that it is finalizing plans to welcome Catholicos Aram I in October. The itinerary for the pontifical visit of His Holiness to the Eastern United States will include all parishes from Washington, D.C. to Wisconsin:

October 20-24: Watertown, MA
October 24-25: Worcester, MA
October 25-26: Indian Orchard, MA
October 26-27: Troy, NY
October 27: New Britain, CT
October 28-31: Providence, RI
October 31: Whitinsville, MA
November 1: North Andover, MA
November 2-3: Granite City, IL
November 3-5: Glenview, IL
November 6: Waukegan, IL
November 6: Racine, WI
November 7-8: Detroit, MI
November 8-14: Washington, D.C.
November 14-15: Philadelphia, PA
November 15-17: Ridgefield, NJ
November 17-21: New York City

His Holiness, who recently wrapped up his pontifical visit to Canada, also made a scheduled detour to visit the Armenian community of Niagara Falls, New York, along with his pontifical delegation, including Archbishop Papken Tcharian, Prelate of Canada, Bishop Torkom Donoyan, Prelate of the Western Prelacy, Rev. Fr. Barouyr Shernezian, Dean of the Theological Seminary and staff-bearer, and Krikor Mahserejian, co-chair of the Central Executive Council of the Holy See.

Led by a Canadian police procession, His Holiness was welcomed at the United States border by His Eminence Archbishop Anoushavan Tanielian, Prelate of the Eastern Prelacy of the US, and the faithful. United States police escorted the procession to the Cemetery of Niagara Falls, where a requiem service was conducted for the souls of the deceased members of the local Armenian community.

Subsequently, His Holiness visited St. Hagop Church of Niagara Falls. As the choir and clergy sang the customary liturgical hymn “Hrashapar,” the Catholicos entered the church to a warm welcome by Archbishop Anoushavan and the parishioners. A reception to honor His Holiness was held afterwards at the parish hall. During the luncheon, remarks were made by the chair of the church’s Board of Trustees, Mayor of Niagara Falls Robert Restaino, and the Prelate.

Following an exchange of souvenirs, His Holiness addressed the audience and expressed his joy for the opportunity, recalling his frequent visits to the community as a student studying in New York. He also commended the fact that the Armenian spirit is kept alive in the community.




AW: ARS of Eastern USA answers the call for Camp Haiastan

FRANKLIN, Mass.—At the end of the 2020 camping season, the AYF Camp Haiastan Board of Directors put out a call for help to improve the Camp’s aging kitchen. Operating in the same condition for over 30 years, the kitchen had been managed each year by great staff working to feed over 400 kids every summer. Over the years, these numbers added up to a lot of wear and tear!

35 chapters rallied to raise $100,000 for the Camp Haiastan kitchen renovation project.

The Armenian Relief Society of Eastern USA (ARS of EUSA) answered the Camp’s call. At its 2021 regional convention, the ARS of EUSA passed a resolution to raise funds for the kitchen project.

In the year that followed, the 35 chapters of the ARS rallied to raise $100,000 for the Camp Haiastan kitchen renovation project – all while continuing to work for their ongoing humanitarian programs and projects aimed at helping Armenia, Artsakh, Javakhk, Lebanon and Syria. 

“The ARS has been a staunch supporter of AYF Camp Haiastan since the Camp was purchased back in 1941. Throughout the years, we have answered the call for assistance from Camp Haiastan. Our commitment remains as strong as ever,” stated Caroline Chamavonian, chair of the ARS of EUSA Regional Board.

The swift response from ARS chapter members and their executive bodies to the community’s needs ensured that the Camp kitchen will be fully operational with largely new and updated equipment for the start of the 2023 summer season. The new appliances include an industrial oven with six burners, along with a grill, mixer, salad bar, beverage dispensers, warming rack and serving station. 

“The nutrition team is extremely thankful for those who made the new kitchen equipment possible. We are very excited to start using it to bring delicious and nutritious meals to the campers and staff of Camp Haiastan,” enthused head chef Thomas Houle.

The Camp board, executive director, staff and all current and future campers extend their deepest gratitude to the ARS of Eastern USA for always offering unconditional support and for being an example of what is possible when a community comes together.




RFE/RL Armenian Report – 06/22/2023

                                        Thursday, 


Yerevan Hits Back At Moscow Over Lachin Corridor Shootout


Armenia - The building of the Armenian Foreign Ministry, Yerevan.


Armenia’s government on Thursday continued to blame Russian peacekeepers for 
last week’s shooting incident in the Lachin corridor, dismissing Moscow’s 
reaction to it and criticism of Yerevan.

The government insisted that Armenian border guards opened fire on June 15 to 
stop Azerbaijani servicemen manning a checkpoint set up in the corridor from 
placing an Azerbaijani flag on adjacent Armenian territory. Baku maintains that 
they did not cross into Armenia.

Videos of the incident suggest that the Azerbaijanis were escorted by Russian 
soldiers as they crossed a bridge over the Hakari river in a bid to hoist the 
flag. The Armenian Foreign Ministry summoned the Russian ambassador in Yerevan 
on June 16 to express “strong discontent” with the Russian peacekeepers’ actions.

The Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, on Wednesday defended 
the peacekeepers and rejected the Armenian criticism as “absolutely groundless.” 
She said the incident resulted from the “absence of a delimited 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border.”

The Armenian Foreign Ministry dismissed that argument, saying that Zakharova 
echoed Baku’s regular justifications of its “aggressive actions against 
Armenia’s borders.”

“It is not clear why the Russian peacekeepers participated in that Azerbaijani 
operation given that both the purpose and even the scene of the operation were 
clearly outside the scope of the peacekeepers' functions and their zone of 
responsibility,” the ministry spokeswoman, Ani Badalian, said in written 
comments.

Badalian said the Hakari bridge marks the Armenian-Azerbaijani border in that 
area. Instead of “looking for excuses,” Moscow should help to ensure the 
conflicting parties’ full compliance with a Russian-brokered agreement that 
stopped the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh, added the official.

Russian peacekeepers stand guard in the town of Lachin (Berdzor), December 1, 
2020.

The ceasefire agreement placed the only road connecting Karabakh to Armenia 
under the control of the Russian peacekeeping contingent and committed 
Azerbaijan to guaranteeing safe passage through it. Azerbaijan blocked 
commercial traffic there last December before setting up the checkpoint in April 
in what the Armenian side denounced as a further gross violation of the 
agreement.

Right after the June 15 incident, Baku also blocked relief supplies to and 
medical evacuations from Karabakh, aggravating the humanitarian crisis in the 
Armenian-populated region. Zakharova called for the lifting of the blockade, 
saying that Baku should not “hold Karabakh’s population hostage to political 
disagreements with Yerevan.”

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and other Armenian officials have repeatedly 
accused the Russians of not doing enough to unblock the vital road. They also 
complained about a lack of broader Russian support for Armenia in the conflict 
with Azerbaijan.




Karabakh Still Unable To Evacuate Patients Due To Azeri Blockade

        • Artak Khulian

Nagorno-Karabakh - A Red Cross vehicle is seen outside a hospital in Stepanakert.


One week after Azerbaijan blocked the movement of humanitarian convoys through 
the Lachin corridor, nearly 190 seriously ill residents of Nagorno-Karabakh are 
waiting to be evacuated to hospitals in Armenia for urgent treatment, health 
authorities in Stepanakert said on Thursday.

“They include persons subject to immediate evacuation, who are suffering from 
oncological and cardiovascular diseases,” Angelina Isakhanian, a spokeswoman for 
the Karabakh health ministry, told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “They need to be 
evacuated in order to promptly receive proper medical treatment and avoid 
further complications.”

Such medical evacuations were carried out only by the International Committee of 
the Red Cross (ICRC) after Azerbaijan stopped last December commercial traffic 
though the sole road connecting Karabakh to Armenia. Baku blocked them on June 
15 following a shootout near an Azerbaijani checkpoint that was controversially 
set up in the corridor in late April.

“There has been no progress so far,” said Eteri Musayelian, a spokeswoman for 
the ICRC office in Stepanakert. “We remain in touch will all decision makers, 
monitor the situation and hope to resume our movements through the Lachin 
corridor as soon as the situation allows.”

The tightening of the blockade also aggravated the shortages of food, medicine 
and other essential items experienced by Karabakh’s population for the last 
seven months. The authorities in Stepanakert said on Monday that local hospitals 
have suspended non-urgent surgeries due to the lack of drugs and other medical 
supplies.

Armenia’s Health Minister Anahit Avanesian said on Thursday said health 
officials in Yerevan are “in daily contact” with their Karabakh colleagues to 
try to help them cope with the worsening crisis. The Armenian government is also 
keeping its “international partners” posted about the situation in Karabakh, she 
said.




Armenian-Azeri Talks Rescheduled For Next Week

        • Astghik Bedevian

U.S. - U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken hosts talks between the Armenian 
and Azerbaijani foreign ministers, May 1, 2023.


A fresh meeting of the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan, postponed by 
Baku earlier this month, will take place in Washington next week, Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian announced on Thursday.

Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan and his Azerbaijani counterpart Jeyhun Bayramov 
were originally scheduled to meet there on June 12. According to the Armenian 
Foreign Ministry, the talks were cancelled “at the request of the Azerbaijani 
side.” The U.S. State Department insisted last week that the delay was “100 
percent due to scheduling issues.”

“We must make every effort to establish peace and sign an agreement to normalize 
[Armenian-Azerbaijani] relations,” said Pashinian. “The meeting of the Armenian 
and Azerbaijani foreign ministers will take place in Washington next week, and 
our delegation is leaving for the United States with this intent.”

“We look forward to hosting another round of talks in Washington soon as the 
parties continue to pursue a peaceful future in the South Caucasus region,” a 
State Department spokesman, Vedant Patel, told reporters on Wednesday. He gave 
no dates for the talks.

Mirzoyan and Bayramov reported major progress towards an Armenian-Azerbaijani 
peace treaty after holding four-day talks outside Washington last month. 
Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev met together with European 
Union chief Charles Michel later in May. They held two more meetings in the 
following weeks and are due to meet again in July.

The two sides say that despite Pashinian’s pledge to recognize Azerbaijani 
sovereignty over Nagorno-Karabakh through the peace treaty, they still disagree 
on other sticking points. Tensions along the Armenian-Azerbaijani border and 
“the line of contact” around Karabakh have steadily increased over the last few 
weeks, with the sides accusing each other of violating the ceasefire on a 
virtually daily basis.

A view of an Azerbaijani checkpoint set up at the entry to the Lachin corridor, 
, by a bridge across the Hakari river, May 2, 2023.

A June 15 skirmish on the Lachin corridor led Azerbaijan to completely block 
relief supplies to Karabakh through the sole road connecting the disputed region 
to Armenia. The move aggravated shortages of food, medicine and other essential 
items in Karabakh. Baku already blocked commercial traffic through the corridor 
as well as electricity and gas supplies to Karabakh several months ago.

Pashinian again condemned the “illegal blockade” as he opened a weekly session 
of his cabinet in Yerevan.

“Everything is being done [by Azerbaijan] to make the life of Armenians in 
Nagorno-Karabakh impossible,” he said. “This is exactly the policy of ethnic 
cleansing that we have been warning about for years.”

Pashinian at the same time renewed his calls for the launch of an “international 
mechanism for Baku-Stepanakert dialogue” that would address “the issue of the 
rights and security of Nagorno-Karabakh’s Armenians.”

Critics in Yerevan and Stepanakert say the restoration of Azerbaijani rule, 
implicitly advocated by Pashinian, would only force the Karabakh Armenians to 
flee the territory.


Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Armenian Film Society announces casting call

The Armenian Film Society has announced an open casting call for an Oscar-nominated writer/director and Oscar-nominated producers in search of Armenian actors for an upcoming feature film drama based on actual events.

The roles being cast are:

Mariam (Principal)

Mariam (Armenian-Iraqi, 50s) is a tough, resourceful woman who has experienced great loss, namely, the death of her two sons and husband in a tragic accident after the 2003 American invasion of Iraq. Before the war, Mariam was a high school literature teacher. She’s intelligent with a wry sense of humor and unfailingly direct/honest, perhaps to a fault. About her job, Mariam liked to say: “I love the books… but not the kids.” When we first meet Mariam in the story, the war is a week old, and she makes the best of it with her husband, two grown sons, and daughter, Nora, at their home – until tragedy strikes. We re-meet Mariam about fifteen years later, living in Glendale, California with her daughter and her children. She has slowed down considerably over the years. She finds the noise and motion of the house difficult to handle, often shushing the children or walking away inexplicably as someone speaks to her. Mariam passes the days knitting or reading scripture, anything to just keep going and forget her losses. But someone from her past reaches out and she must re-confront everything that happened in Iraq.

Note: Actors auditioning for Mariam must speak Western Armenian, Iraqi Arabic and English, and be able to play Mariam over the span of 15 years (early 50s in Iraq; mid 60s in US).

Nora (Supporting)

Nora (Armenian-Iraqi, late 20s / early 30s, daughter of Mariam) is a good-humored, resilient, if at times stubborn young woman. She is a deep well and has navigated the loss of her father and brothers with grace. When we first meet Nora, it’s the early days of the war and she is in her twenties. To pass the days, she helps her mother clean and cook, talks on the phone with friends and plays cards with her brothers. Nora is outspoken within the family and not afraid of a fight. She bickers often with her father, disagreeing with his decisions about how to handle the family’s life/affairs during wartime. When we re-meet Nora many years later, she is married and a mother of two boys. She and her husband fight often, but they like it this way. They are both equal-parts stubborn and playful. Nora is the center of her family’s new life in Glendale, filling a role that belonged to her Mom in Baghdad.

Note: Actors auditioning for Nora must speak Western Armenian, Iraqi Arabic and English, and be able to play Nora over the span of 15 years (early 20s in Iraq; late 30s in the US).

Submissions are being accepted from both actors and non-actors. All must be able to speak both Western Armenian and Iraqi Arabic. 

Please email [email protected] with a brief video introduction. This should be in English and up to one minute in length with a brief introduction about yourself to give the filmmakers a sense of who you are.




Gullans, Babayan impress with concert dedicated to Maestro Arsen Sayan

By Dr. Jeffrey Howard

ARLINGTON, Mass.—On Sunday, June 11, eager concertgoers enjoyed a lovely program by cellist Christina Gullans and pianist Naira Babayan in Arlington, Massachusetts. Organized by the Armenian Cultural Foundation (ACF) and co-sponsored by the Amaras Art Alliance, this diverse and inspiring concert was part of the Mirak Chamber Music Series and was given in tribute to the late Maestro Arsen Sayan (1928-2018), founder of the KNAR intercommunal Armenian Choral Group in Philadelphia and former musical-cultural director and chief producer of the VOA Armenian Service.

Pianist Naira Babayan and cellist Christina Gullans performing at the concert. (Photo by David Elizian)

Babayan and Gullans brought an interesting and challenging program to the audience this day. After opening remarks by ACF curator Ara Ghazarians, the program began with the Album Bien Tempéré by Ghazarossian and continued with works by Sayat Nova, Hovounts, Komitas, Baghdasarian and Harutyunyan. 

The largest work on the program, both in length and difficulty, was the Sonata for Cello and Piano by Avet Terteryan. Written in 1954, this is a complex and demanding work. Energizing and dramatic, the piece demonstrates a huge range of both emotional and technical skills for both instruments. 

Gullans produced a wonderfully lyrical sound throughout the piece. The many dramatic and haunting melodies came across with grace and emotional maturity. Babayan also handled the many technical challenges with ease and clear musical direction. There is indeed a profound and undeniable power in this piece that all were able to appreciate and enjoy.

Gullans displayed a nuanced and sincere understanding of the Armenian folk style throughout the program. She has a true affinity for this music and her interpretations were deeply felt and artistically satisfying. The Nocturne by Baghdasarian and Impromptu by Harutyunyan were particularly emotive and enjoyable.

In addition to the duo pieces on the program, Babayan also performed a set of solo piano works all from the rich folk songs originally notated by Komitas. Pieces like Garuna and Groung truly pull at the heartstrings of all Armenian people. Babayan performed these pieces with grace, control and inspiration throughout. 

It should be noted that the program also featured the paintings of Ani Babayan, connecting physical artwork with the traditional melodies of Armenian folk music in a most effective manner.  

The one encore performed by this duo was the Ey Dou Jahel song written by Ruben Gregorian. When considered as a whole, this was indeed an exciting afternoon that featured historical references, beautiful artwork, cultural insights and creative musicianship.  

 

Dr. Jeffrey Howard is Associate Professor of Violin at Towson University. He is a member of the Baltimore Trio, the Kassian-Howard Duo, and is a regular substitute member of the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra.