Kyrgyzstan extradited the suspect in Armenian Turkish magazines murder

Haber Tusba
Turkey.

Turkish police announced on Sunday that Amnesty International, a suspect on the run in year 2007 murder of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink was brought to Turkey on Saturday after his arrest in Kyrgyzstan.

Amnesty International Convicted in trial over launch death of your religion in Istanbul was sentenced to 12 years in prison and six months in prison. been accused of Help OS killer convicted of hiding used weapon in The murder and lending money For the killer as well as his mobile phone.

Turkish anti-terror police and police intelligence discovered that Amnesty International was in hiding in Bishkek and contacted the Kyrgyz authorities. The Kyrgyz security forces arrested the suspect in February. When he was arrested, he was holding his brother’s passport with paste his picture on photo ID instead.

Police said the suspect has been handed over over to the authorities of mtris prison in Istanbul to serve his sentence.

A court in Istanbul has sentenced Amnesty International in 2012 on shipment of Premeditated aiding and abetting murder. The Court of Appeal upheld his sentence in 2013. In another trial on your religion murderwas sentenced to one year10 months and 15 days, in prison for membership of terrorist group in 2019, but it was discovered that already They fled abroad.

your religion was liberated-in-President of Agos newspaper when he was shot dead by Teen OS in daylight, a murder who raised up a public anger and triggered Unprecedented protests. An outspoken critic, as well as a supporter of Turkey and Armenia rapprochement, Dink allegedly killed over His attitude by the teenager who He identified himself as a nationalist.

The operating system , who He was arrested while returning to his hometown in Northern Turkey from Istanbul where Dink was shot dead outside offices of Agos, 22 years and 10 months in prison in prisonbut trial and investigation took Another turn when the prosecutor now wanted on shipment of membership of FETÖ (FETÖ terrorist group) said in Accusing him that Ergenekon is a “terrorist”. group,” I was behind The murder. Ergenekon’s name was of a network of People described as terrorists group By prosecutors, chiefs of police and judges who Coordinated trials against they. Years later, it was discovered that Ergenekon was organization Made by FETÖ infiltrators in Judiciary and law enforcement for prison people terrorist group targeted using fabricated-up False accusations and evidence.

Although judged by S. AS, the trial and the parallel investigation of his prayers continued for years, an extraordinarily extended period of Time and mystery to be blamed now on FETÖ role in Investigation. When the terrorist group It has been classified as a security threat in Late 2013 after two coup attempts and intruders in The judiciary was suspended and the course was held of Investigation changed after again.

In 2014, the court paved the way for way for indictment of public Officials over they role in The murder. former police chiefs, who They got caught for Their links were with veto also Try in this is new Issue of your religion murder. a new The indictment included the leader of the FETÖ terrorist organization Fethullah Gülen, prosecutors Terrorist-linked journalists group in the case. Prosecutors stated that murder It was first violent act of Gulen in her attempt to seize power in Turkey. It seems that Gülen and others sought to imprison them critics Or those who block their infiltration into law enforcement, judiciary and military by linking them to a murder under the cover of of Sensors “Ergenekon”. last year six Suspects linked to VETO, among them former Police chiefs, sentence them for to cover up of The murder While the trial is in progress for The fleeing suspects, including Fethullah Gulen.

Opinion from Yerevan: “Direct Armenia-Azerbaijan dialogue is unlikely”


March 24 2022


  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Armenian-Azerbaijani peace agenda. Who benefits from stalemate?

“A direct dialogue between Armenia and Azerbaijan is unlikely” – this opinion was expressed by political scientist Armen Vardanyan during a discussion on the topic “Armenian-Azerbaijani peace agenda. Who benefits from stalemate?” Another participant in the discussion, political scientist Edgar Vardanyan, believes that “the provocation of a new full-scale war is also unlikely”.


  • What’s behind new gas outages in Karabakh: technical shutdown or sabotage?
  • Baku, Yerevan react to celebration of 30th anniversary of Azerbaijan’s UN accession in Shusha
  • Enclaves – islands of Armenian-Azerbaijani confrontation

Armenia and Azerbaijan have different approaches to the peace agenda
According to political scientist Edgar Vardanyan, Azerbaijan wants everyone to forget about the existence of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and Armenia cannot allow this:

“Since the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict constitutes a large part of the agenda of the Armenian-Azerbaijani relations, it is logical that we turned to the OSCE Minsk Group [the format of negotiations under the co-chairmanship of the United States, France and Russia, which was in effect until the 2020 Karabakh war] with a request to take on active functions or attempt to perform certain actions.

The political scientist believes that this step of the Armenian authorities indicates that they are in favor of peace and want to normalize relations with Azerbaijan:

“But there are issues that cannot be ignored, there are formats that cannot be put aside, forgotten about”.

In the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war and the confrontation between Russia and the West, the work of the Minsk Group, as Edgar Vardanyan put it, is “objectively difficult”:

“On the other hand, members of the group may not take joint action, but may contribute to this agenda individually. Everyone is interested in resolving this issue peacefully, everyone understands that new escalations are highly undesirable, especially in the current situation”.

According to Armen Vardanyan, Azerbaijan also wants peace, but in a different way and in its own format. It implies recognition by Armenia of its territorial integrity, including Nagorno-Karabakh.

However, the political scientist considers a direct dialogue between Armenia and Azerbaijan without intermediaries unlikely:

“Azerbaijan is well aware that Armenia is weakened after the war, and is trying in every possible way to take advantage of this situation. We see how provocations are constantly carried out at different areas [on the border of Armenia], but Armenia does not succumb to them”.

The political scientist recalls that after the 44-day war, the ambassadors of the United States, France, and a number of EU countries accredited in Armenia have repeatedly stated that the conflict has not yet been resolved, it is necessary to resolve the issue of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh:

“This is a clear signal to Azerbaijan that these countries will not make a final decision on the issue by force [that is, following the results of the war]”.

At the same time, Armen Vardanyan is sure that Russia is not interested in a comprehensive solution to the conflict:

“Russia needs this conflict to remain frozen, but not completely resolved. This conflict is a club in the hands of Russia, by using which it puts pressure on both sides. As soon as the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict is really resolved, Russia will lose its weight and influence in the region”.

Armen Vardanyan even excludes such a possibility. He believes that a new war in Karabakh will become “a matter of Russia’s authority.” The expert also sees Azerbaijan’s invasion of the sovereign territory of Armenia as unlikely, since it is fraught with “serious consequences for Azerbaijan.”

The political scientist says that Aliyev “understands very well that the Karabakh conflict has not been completely resolved”, although he constantly announces this. The awareness of incompleteness confirms the rearmament and modernization of the Azerbaijani army, as well as some statements by the President of Azerbaijan:

“Aliev speaks in almost all his statements about Armenian revanchism, about the possibility that Armenia will start a war, and this reveals his fears”.

According to the political scientist, time is working in favor of Azerbaijan, but he believes that the situation may change in the near future:

“The US and Iran have almost reached an agreement on a new nuclear deal. This means that Iran will return to the world oil market. Oil prices will fall, and Azerbaijan’s oil revenues will also, which will affect the economy, as well as the acquisition of new weapons”.

According to Edgar Vardanyan, in the current situation, the provocation of a new war is not in the interests of Turkey and Azerbaijan:

“It is necessary to understand what is the goal, what result they can achieve in this situation, especially since today Turkey and Azerbaijan are trying to be reliable partners of Russia and the West. But Armenia does not pursue an aggressive policy, has no territorial claims against these states, considers the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as a matter of self-determination, and, moreover, constantly talks about peace”.

Turkey and Armenia inch closer to mending ties: The second Karabakh war changed their diplomatic relations

March 24 2022

Written byLamiya Adilgizi

Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said that the nation is eager to establish diplomatic relations with Turkey and open the borders with the neighboring country in an interview with Turkish news agency Anadolu on March 15.  His statement came days after Mirzoyan met his Turkish counterpart Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu on the sidelines of the Antalya Diplomacy Forum that was held on March 11–13. The meeting was reported to be “productive and constructive.”

The meeting in Antalya was the first sit-down meeting between the two countries’ foreign ministers since 2009 and is part of mutual efforts to establish diplomatic ties that have been severed since the early 1990s.

For the first time in the history of the two countries, both Turkey and Armenia are willing to set aside the Armenian genocide and disputes over the Nagorno-Karabakh region that have soured their diplomatic relations for decades. Turkey has refused to recognize the 1915 events as a genocide, and it also supported Azerbaijan during the Second Karabakh War between Azerbaijan and Armenia in 2020.

Although Turkey was among the first countries to recognize Armenia’s independence in 1991, the relations between the two countries severed in 1993 when Ankara closed its borders as a gesture of Turkish solidarity with its close ally Azerbaijan during the first Nagorno-Karabakh war. At the time, Azerbaijan lost control over the Nagorno Karabakh enclave and seven adjacent territories.

In 2008, when Turkey and Armenia signaled their mutual interest in mending ties, the process was stalled due to Azerbaijan’s staunch opposition. As a result, the Zurich protocols — also known as “football diplomacy” — failed, leaving the two countries even further apart diplomatically.

The results of the second Karabakh war changed the fabric of their diplomatic relations. With Azerbaijan having restored control over the seven territories around Nagorno Karabakh, previously lost to Armenia, “Turkey began to signal its readiness for new talks with Armenia,” the International Crisis Group wrote in an analysis previewing the new stage in normalization.

The first round of talks was held in the Russian capital Moscow on January 14, 2022, raising hopes for normalization, including possible border opening.

The latter could impact economic, social, and cultural relations between the two countries and their citizens, according to officials in Armenia’s capital Yerevan. “The opening of the borders will have a positive impact on regular communication between the two countries, trade and economic relations, people-to-people contacts and, in general, stability in the region,” Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said on March 14. He added that, according to polls, most Armenians approve of the normalization.

A recent poll by the International Republican Institute published in January 2022, 90 percent of Armenians think Turkey is the greatest political and security threat to Armenia. In an interview with Global Voices, James De Witt, director of the IRI Armenia Program, said, “Armenian society blames Turkey for the lost war [in 2020] and sees it as a continuation of [Turkey’s] policy of genocide.”

Following the January talks in Moscow, Istanbul and Yerevan resumed charter flights on February 2, 2022, and met for the second time in Vienna on February 24, where both sides reiterated their commitment to continue negotiations aimed at fully normalizing relations. The reopening of flights was welcomed in Turkey. Speaking to reporters, following the first meeting in Moscow in January and the decision to resume flights, Garo Paylan, a member of parliament from the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) in Turkey, said the resumption of flights was  “an important step” urging the politicians “to have this window of opportunity result in peace.”

“There may be problems, but we can have diplomats on both sides, open borders, launch regional economic programs that will benefit both sides [as well as] the people of Armenia and the people of Turkey,” Paylan, who is from an Armenian family in Istanbul, was quoted as saying on February 15.

Already, TABDC estimates the trade volume between Turkey and Armenia could reach USD 1 billion in three years, in addition to tourism revenue if the borders were to open.

As of February 2, Armenians and Turks can choose between the Turkish budget carrier Pegasus and the Moldovan budget FlyOne airlines for flights operating between the two countries three times a week.

Aybars Gorgulu, general director of the Istanbul-based think-tank Center for Public Policy and Democracy Studies, told Global Voices,  the rapprochement between Ankara and Yerevan and the opening of the borders will have economic and social implications. “Particularly in the border cities such as Kars and Iğdır, commercial and touristic vitality will be experienced, and thus social reconciliation will be achieved over time,” said Gorgulu.

Echoing Paylan, Noyan Soyak, vice-chairman of Turkish-Armenian Business Development Council (TABDC), told Global Voices that open borders and the trade it entails will overcome the historical and political problems by bringing the two estranged nations closer. “Trade will be a factor to provide peace between the two societies, and it will also be another chance to re-introduce these two societies, which are living on the same land but are physically far from each other.

Soyak added that the Doğukapı Kars railway, which remains in good shape despite the closed borders, will create new opportunities for international projects such as the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative, which promotes land-based transportation routes between Europe and China and is naturally aligned with unlocking the transit potential in the South Caucasia. “Geographical position of Azerbaijan on the Caspian shores and Armenia with the neighboring Turkey is very attractive for linking Eurasia’s two economic powerhouses: the European Union and East Asia,” Soyak said.

Additional attempts to thaw relations between the two countries are also visible. In early January, Armenia lifted an embargo on Turkish goods. Turkey invited Armenian officials to the Antalya Diplomacy Forum, where the two sides met in March 2022. Chances of Azerbaijan intervening as was the case in 2008 are also slim. In December 2021, officials in Baku reiterated the country won’t be an obstacle to the Ankara-Yerevan rapprochement.

But while leaders may be moving forward, doubters remain. Calling the new talks a top-down process, led by Turkish and Armenian political leaders, Thomas de Waal, the region’s top expert from Carnegie Europe, points out that both sides lack a strategy to win over doubters.

Philip Gamaghelyan, a long-time peace-builder from Yerevan, and the founder of the peacebuilding initiative Imagine Center for Conflict Transformation, agrees. “What we have today between Turkey and Armenia is a strictly official process with practically no grassroots support,” Gamaghelyan told Global Voices, adding, “the focus today is not on reconciliation at all but on ‘hard’ issues such as border and transportation links.”

The reality is exacerbated by the lack of peacebuilders on the diplomacy scene. Gamaghelyan told Global Voices the main reason for that was the transition of the former peace-builders to the government positions in Armenia and the lack of collaboration between almost absent Azerbaijani and Turkish peacebuilding civil society initiatives.

Aybars Gorgulu is more optimistic in his analysis. For Gorgulu opening of the borders, and establishment of diplomatic relations are just the beginning of a much longer process of reconciliation, including over such traumatic issues such as recognition of genocide. Gorgulu believes these and other issues can only be resolved within the process of normalization and people-to-people connections between Armenians and Turks.

The sentiments on the ground — at least in Turkey — attest to that. İlim Göktaş, one of the residents of Kalkankale village, who worked at Doğukapı (Eastern Gate) Train Station in Kars for six years back in the 1990s, told Anadolu Agency he hoped “the gate will open, peace and tranquility will come to the region, and our [local] economy will revive.”

https://globalvoices.org/2022/03/24/turkey-and-armenia-inch-closer-to-mending-ties/

Armenia, Azerbaijan Being Considered For Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Observer Status

March 24 2022
 Mar 24, 2022Posted bySilk Road Briefing

The member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) are actively considering the issue of obtaining observer status by Armenia and Azerbaijan, SCO Secretary General Zhang Ming has said.

The SCO is a regional political, trade and security alliance that includes China, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Observer states include Afghanistan, Belarus, Mongolia, while Dialogue partners include Cambodia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Turkey, as well as Armenia and Azerbaijan. Upcoming Dialogue partners include Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Ming stated that “As for the issue of obtaining observer status by Azerbaijan and Armenia, the SCO member-states are actively considering it. In this regard, I am optimistic although at the moment I can not name the exact time.”

SCO secretary general stressed that of course, the relations between the two countries are an important factor that should be taken into account.

“The SCO member-states are unanimous in not introducing bilateral contradictions into the organization,” Ming added. “This is also an obligation which any country that claims to join SCO must fulfill.”

Armenia and Azerbaijan have strained relations and fought a war, won by Azerbaijan over disputed territories in 2020. Geopolitical measures have settled down since although sporadic violence occasionally spills out. However, upgrading the two would be positive news for both as the potential for future conflict can be minimized by SCO pressure, and as both will gain from the need to develop new supply chains between China, Asia and Europe via the Caucasus given the current situation with the northern routes via Russia and Belarus. A later, logical step to take would be for Georgia to join as a Dialogue Partner as doing so would complete the supply chain platforms from East to West with Georgia’s assistance, generating transit fees and increased added value manufacturing investment for the EU markets by other SCO member states.

Sports: Armenia and Sweden take running target titles at European Shooting Championship

March 24 2022

 b

  •  

  •  Thursday, 24 March 2022

  • Armenia and Sweden were victorious in the women’s and men’s running target finals with both gold medals being contested between compatriots on the latest day of the European Shooting Championship (10 metres) in Hamar in Norway.

    Armenia’s Lilit Mkrtchyan won in straightforward fashion against team-mate Arusyak Grigoryan, beating her 6-0 for the women’s gold medal.

    Mkrtchyan defeated Hungarian Gabriella Kortvelyessy 6-1 in the semi-finals, with Grigoryan winning by the same score against Estonia’s Heili Lepp.

    Bronze went to Lepp, who defeated Kortvelyessy 6-3.

    Emil Martinsson of Sweden took the men’s gold medal, after beating Jesper Nyberg 6-1.

    A competitive semi-final saw Martinsson defeat Jozsef Sike of Hungary 9-7 to make the final.

    Nyberg defeated Lukasz Czapla of Poland 6-3 to make it into the gold medal match before losing to his compatriot.

    Sike took the bronze medal by a 6-3 score line over Czapla.

    The European Championship is scheduled to end on Monday (March 28).

    Tensions rise again as Azerbaijani forces cross line of contact – report

    March 24 2022


    Ethnic Armenian soldiers stand in a trench at their position near Nagorno-Karabakh’s town of Martuni, April 8, 2016.
    (photo credit: REUTERS)

    Tensions are rising again between Azerbaijan and Armenia as Azerbaijani forces crossed the line of contact set after a conflict in 2020 and Armenia accused Azerbaijan of cutting off gas supplies to the country.

    The de facto Republic of Artsakh’s NKR InfoCenter reported on Thursday evening that Azerbaijani forces had crossed the line of contact set after the war in 2020 in the direction of the village of Parukh. Initial reports indicated that the forces had entered Parukh and surrounding areas.

    The Republic of Artsakh is a de facto republic internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan. Last year, the area in which the republic sits was recaptured by Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh war against Armenia.


    Women and children from the nearby village of Khramort were evacuated for security reasons, with the government of the de facto republic urging the population to remain calm as the situation along the rest of the line of contact remained stable.

    As of Thursday evening, Russian peacekeepers were conducting talks with the Azerbaijani forces and the movement of the Azerbaijani troops had halted, although they had not left the area.

    An Azeri soldier and police officer talk as they stand guard at the Kalbajar district, Azerbaijan, December 21, 2020 (credit: AZIZ KARIMOV/REUTERS)

    No shots have been fired in the ongoing conflict.

    Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry rejected the reports, saying: “Information spread by Armenian sources about the situation along with the territory of Azerbaijan, where the Russian peacekeeping contingent is temporarily stationed, have allegedly escalated does not reflect reality.


    “Positions and places of deployment are being clarified at the checkpoint, no clashes or incidents have occurred,” added the Defense Ministry. “The situation is artificially exaggerated by Armenian sources. The purpose is to create an atmosphere that can trigger deliberate hysteria, confuse and mislead the public. There is no reason to worry or panic.”

    The Defense Ministry did not explicitly deny that Azerbaijani forces had crossed the line of contact.

    In recent days, Armenian authorities have reported that Azerbaijan has cut off a natural gas line to the Artsakh Republic. The pipeline, which goes through Azerbaijani-held territory, had in the past been damaged in an explosion and was repaired by Azerbaijan, who Armenia says added a valve to the line.

    On Monday, the line was closed, cutting off the natural gas supply to Artsakh amid extremely cold weather conditions and snowfall. This is the second time in a matter of weeks that the line has been closed.

    Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan warned that Artsakh is “on the verge of a humanitarian catastrophe.” 

    Pashinyan argued that Azerbaijan is attempting to drag Armenia into war, stressing that the pipeline was closed right after Armenia expressed approval for peace agenda proposals offered by Azerbaijan and interest in moving forward with peace talks.

    The Armenian Foreign Ministry condemned the violation of the line of contact and the cutting off of the gas line, saying the actions “once again demonstrate that official Baku continues to grossly violate” ceasefire agreements made at the end of the conflict in 2020. The ministry referred to the actions as steps aimed at “ethnic cleansing.”


    Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova urged the two countries to solve the issue as soon as possible, stressing that “the already tense situation should not be aggravated by any action.”

    Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu discussed the tense situation, as well as other issues of mutual interest with Armenian Defense Minister Suren Papikyan on Thursday evening, according to RIA Novosti.

    In 2020, a slightly more than month-long war broke out between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh and nearby areas, ending with a new line of contact drawn. Sporadic clashes have been reported along the line since the war.


    Freedom House: Azerbaijan must restore gas supplies to Karabakh

    March 24 2022

    PanARMENIAN.Net – Azerbaijan must prevent a humanitarian crisis by restoring unhindered gas supplies to the people of Nagorno-Karabakh, Freedom House has said, as the people of Artsakh have been left without gas in freezing temperatures.

    The organization said the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh have endured weeks of freezing temperatures without heat or hot water.

    The European Union Lead Spokesperson for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Peter Stano said earlier that the bloc is “concerned” about reports of a renewed disruption of the gas supply to Nagorno-Karabakh.

    Beginning from March 8, over 100,000 residents in Karabakh were deprived of gas for over 10 days, and because the pipeline was damaged in territories currently under Baku’s control, the Azerbaijani military would not allow the Armenian side to eliminate the problem. Gas supply resumed on March 19, only to be interrupted again on March 22.

    The Azerbaijan armed forces have also been violating the ceasefire and using loudspeakers to spread panic among the population of Nagorno-Karabakh, attempting to force them to leave their homes.

    Karabakh says still negotiating resumption of gas supply

    March 24 2022

    PanARMENIAN.Net – Secretary of the Security Council of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) Vitaly Balasanyan, with assistance from the Russian peacekeepers, will coordinate efforts aimed at restoring gas supply in the country, the NKR InfoCenter reports.

    “The Government of the Republic of Artsakh seeks to resolve this crucial humanitarian issue as soon as possible, and we assurethat all possible measures are being taken in the diplomatic arena, which, of course, are not subject to publicity,” the InfoCenter said in a statement from the authorities.

    Beginning from March 8, over 100,000 residents in Karabakh were deprived of gas for over 10 days, and because the pipeline was damaged in territories currently under Baku’s control, the Azerbaijani military would not allow the Armenian side to eliminate the problem. Gas supply resumed on March 19, only to be interrupted again on March 22.

    The Azerbaijan armed forces have also been violating the ceasefire and using loudspeakers to spread panic among the population of Nagorno-Karabakh, attempting to force them to leave their homes.

    10 Grapes Worth Knowing Better

    March 21 2022

    For many reasons, these varieties have either been unfairly dismissed or are little known outside their home regions. But they make joyful wines.

    Credit…Jason Raish

    March 21, 2022

    A few weeks ago I opened a bottle that caught my attention. It was a soulful, graceful, strikingly pure red from the Aveyron region of southwestern France made by Nicolas Carmarans, a vigneron who makes natural wines from grapes that have long grown in the area.

    This particular grape was fer servadou, a variety that to my knowledge I had never tried.

    As delightful as I found the wine, my encounter with an intriguing new grape was even more joyful. It was a reminder that no matter how well versed one might be in the intricacies of producers, regions and issues, wine always has more to reveal.

    In that spirit, I’d like to suggest 10 grapes that are little-known in the United States but are worth getting to know better. You might not find all of these immediately, but keep your eyes open and try a few. You may be pleasantly surprised.

    Grapes and their relative merits are one of the hoarier topics in wine. Some people believe that the hierarchy of grapes has long been set. To stray outside the anointed realm is, supposedly, a waste of time. The retired critic Robert M. Parker Jr. was one of these people, castigating those who would promote what he called “godforsaken grapes.”

    I revisit this subject periodically because I believe that we still don’t understand the potential pleasures of hundreds of grapes around the world. So many have been wrongly dismissed because of their place of origin, or because the wines historically made with them were not to modern tastes.

    Some of these assessments may have been correct. But not all. Often, it’s a matter of giving lesser-known grapes the same respect and tender care reserved for more esteemed varieties rather than consigning them to the worst vineyard sites and assuming, by way of conventional wisdom, that their potential is meager.

    Wine, like food, is a hearty invitation to explore. It could simply be a new producer or an unknown region. Or it might be a completely unfamiliar grape, so all of these elements will be new. You could fall in love.

    Sometimes, what seems little-known or obscure becomes well loved. In 2010, I named a dozen grapes that I thought were worth seeking out.

    Some of those varieties, like assyrtiko, frappato, mencía and trousseau, have been embraced, though not exactly at a chardonnay level.

    It’s important to note that while I have used terms like “obscure” and “little known,” I really mean in American and English-speaking wine cultures. All of these grapes are known and loved by those who farm the vines and make the wine. The rest of us are just catching up.

    Here are the 10 grapes, in alphabetical order. Some may be completely unknown to you, others you may have been fortunate enough to have encountered.

    The Savoie region of France and its neighbors have quite a few little-known grapes that make beautiful wines. Mondeuse, persan and gringet are three. But in my exploration of Savoie whites last year, I fell in love with wines made with altesse. They are fragrant and floral, and rich yet refreshing because of the variety’s bracing acidity. Wines labeled Roussette de Savoie will be 100 percent altesse. Those from other Savoie appellations like Apremont will be mostly jacquère with altesse sometimes blended in, a combination that can also be lovely.

    Armenia and Georgia sit next to each other on a wide isthmus between the Caspian and Black seas. This area is the Caucasus, thought by many to be one of the points where wine originated. The two countries have dozens of grapes worth getting to know better, but I want to highlight areni from Armenia, a red grape that I have had only a few times, but each time it was startlingly good — lightly tannic yet fresh with stony flavors of red fruits and great finesse. I don’t have a ready source for Armenian wines, I seem to find them by chance. But I’m looking forward to the next encounter.

    This is the leading red grape of the Bairrada region of Portugal. It long had a reputation for making tough, tannic wines, and you can still find examples. These bottles may need years of aging for the tannins to relax. But many growers have recently found that by macerating the juice and the skins of the grapes for shorter periods, they can make fresher, more elegant wines that are vibrant and lively. Filipa Pato & William Wouters make excellent baga wines, as do Sidónio de Sousa, Casa de Saima and Dirk Niepoort.

    Here is a perfect example of a grape not getting a chance to show its stuff. For centuries it’s been one of the leading grapes of southeastern Spain, though it went ordinarily into nondescript bulk wines. But recently, producers have worked to demonstrate the potential of bobal when farmed conscientiously in the right soils. I’ve found two in particular, Ponce and Mustiguillo, who have shown that bobal can be complex, nuanced, transparent and energetic in the right hands. I have also had an excellent natural bobal from Partida Creus in Catalonia.

    I confess that I have not often been moved by brachetto, so I cannot speak unabashedly of its promise. Most brachettos are sparkling and sweet, and I haven’t found them particularly interesting, though they are popular in the Piedmont region of Italy. But I did recently drink a still, dry brachetto from Matteo Correggia that was fragrant and easygoing. I would not argue that it was profound or complex, but it was so delightfully delicious that I wanted to find more.

    As with brachetto, I cannot claim deep experience with fer servadou, which is often called fer. In fact, the Nicolas Carmarans wine, Maximus, from a biodynamic vineyard on granite soils, is the only one I’ve had, and few other producers who make fer wines are available in the United States. (It is apparently also known as braucol in Gaillac, a region not far from Aveyon.) Regardless, I’m going to try to find more. Meanwhile, fer can take its place next to mauzac, négrette and prunelard, other indigenous grapes of southwestern France intriguing enough to research further.

    Hybrid grapes rarely get any respect. Yet here’s a grape that’s a blend of Vitis vinifera, the species that accounts for almost all the best-loved European wine grapes, Vitis labrusca, a species that is native to America, and at least six additional species. Nobody has done more persuasive work on hybrids than Deirdre Heekin and Caleb Barber of La Garagista in Vermont, whose wines are luminous examples of their potential. One of my favorite Garagista wines, Loups-Garoux, is made entirely of Frontenac. I recently opened a 2017 that was fresh and alive, with wild, exotic fruit flavors and stony undertones. I wonder how it will be in another five years. Luckily, I have a few more bottles.

    Greece offers many red grapes that are little known outside their growing regions. One exception is xinomavro, which is the Greek red most likely to make long-lived, complex wines. But others are well worth further attention, like limniona, mavrotragano and mavrodaphne. But I want to mention mandilaria here, which has often been dismissed, even in Greece, as all dark color and tannins with little character. But what if it were made differently? Last years I drank Great Mother red from Stilianou on Crete, which, like the Bairrada producers and baga, treats mandilaria with the lightest of hands. The result was a fascinating pale red, or dark rosé, that was earthy and lightly fruity.

    This is one of Italy’s great success stories. According to Ian D’Agata’s excellent “Native Wine Grapes of Italy,” this white grape, which had largely disappeared in the mid-20th century, was resurrected by a couple of producers who were looking for better alternatives among indigenous grapes to the more popular but mediocre varieties that had been planted for their productivity. Now grown primarily in the Marche and Abruzzo, pecorino is sharp, energetic and herbal, beautiful with dishes like linguine in clam sauce. Better producers include Antica Tenuta Pietramore, Tiberio and Cataldi Madonna from Abruzzo.

    If trebbiano d’Abruzzese sounds familiar, it’s because “trebbiano” is a name applied to several different Italian white grapes. Most are common but mundane, but not trebbiano d’Abruzzese, a grape that is lively, richly textured, floral and saline. Producers in Abruzzo will tell you that trebbiano d’Abruzzese is in fact rare. Particularly confusing is that the wine, Trebbiano d’Abruzzo, can be made either with trebbiano Toscano, a lesser grape, or the genuine article, trebbiano d’Abruzzese. The key is to seek out reliable producers like Tiberio, Francesco Cirelli, Amorotti and, if you can afford them, Valentini and Emidio Pepe.


     

    NSDC explains how pro-Russian rallies in Serbia, Bulgaria, Armenia interconnected

    Ukraine – March 24 2022


    Russian authorities have set up a series of rallies in Serbia, Bulgaria, Armenia, and Syria to misinform the international community. At the same time, this did not help the Kremlin implement its plans.

    That’s according to the Center for Countering Disinformation at the National Security and Defense Council, Ukrinform reports.

    “The Center for Countering Disinformation at the NSDC reports that the enemy has held a series of rallies to misinform the international community. Russia has long been investing in building a network of pro-Russian organizations abroad to create in Europe the illusion of support for Russia’s actions. Since the beginning of the war, Russia has decided to exploit these assets,” the statement reads.

    Read also: Ukraine won’t stop trying to evacuate people from “hot spots” – Zelensky

    It is noted that a pro-Russian rally was organized in Serbia, where among the main messages were separatist slogans concerning Crimea and Kosovo.

    A pro-Russian rally in Bulgaria was organized by the pro-Kremlin Renaissance party, where protesters demanded a halt to arms supplies to Ukraine.

    In addition, a pro-Russian rally was held in Armenia, where the main message was support for Putin’s actions.

    Also at the rally in Syria, the main narrative was support for Putin’s behavior.

    At the same time, according to the Center, total corruption in Russia’s intelligence community does not contribute to the implementation of the Kremlin’s plans abroad and only exposes Vladimir Putin as a clown in the interational arena.

    As Ukrinform reported earlier on February 24, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the launch of a large-scale invasion of Ukraine. Russian troops have been shelling and destroying civilian infrastructure and residential areas, massivelu using artillery, ballistic missiles, and bombs.