Russia has accused Azerbaijan of violating the ceasefire agreement with Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh region.

 

Moscow on Saturday (March 26) accused Azerbaijan of violating the ceasefire with Armenia signed after the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, deploying troops in areas controlled by Russian forces to maintain peace.

There are frequent incidents between the Armenian and Azerbaijani armed forces, but this is the first time since the conflict in November 2020 that Moscow has accused Vladimir Putin of violating the guarantee agreement. This renewed tension comes at a tense time, during which time Russia has launched a large-scale offensive against Ukraine.

Read more The article is reserved for our subscribersThe role of the Russian military in Karabakh is discussed in Azerbaijan

“Between March 24 and 25, Azerbaijan’s armed forces entered the territory under the responsibility of the Nagorno-Karabakh peacekeeping mission in violation of a tripartite agreement between the leaders of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia (…).In a statement, the Russian Defense Ministry condemned the attack.

In Baguio, there is the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan “Sorry” Russian report “One who does not reflect the truth and accepts only one point of view”. Promised that “Azerbaijan has not violated any rules” Ceasefire Agreement and “Russian Defense Ministry calls for full withdrawal of Armenian troops and illegal armed forces from this internationally recognized territory owned by Azerbaijan.”.

According to Russia, Azerbaijani forces have set up a monitoring station “Four attacks by Pyrrhic type drones” On the Karabakh forces near the Farouk area. “Peacekeeping Commission of Russia commands action to resolve situation (…) Appeal for withdrawal of troops sent to Azerbaijan”The Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement.

Read more The article is reserved for our subscribers“It feels like a siege”: a year after the war, the sad life of Nagorno-Karabakh citizens

An Azerbaijani drone killed three people and wounded fifteen, according to Karabakh officials. “Azerbaijan Armed Forces still in Farouk village”, Karabakh Ministry of Defense lamented. Russian diplomacy revealed it “Deep Concern”.

The agreement, signed on November 9, 2020 by Vladimir Putin and the leaders of Armenia, Nicole Pashinian and Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan, marked the end of a six-week violent conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over control of Nagorno-Karabakh. . Azerbaijani forces made significant regional gains.

Read more The article is reserved for our subscribersNagorno-Karabakh: Vladimir Putin has sealed Yerevan’s defeat after a “complete ceasefire” agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

On Friday, Karabakh officials said two soldiers had been killed by Azerbaijani forces. Armenian Foreign Ministry condemns Saturday “Invasion” It happened and was marked on March 24th “Fixed artillery attack”. He accused his neighbor Karabakh of losing gas and preventing people from warming up, and condemned the situation. “On the brink of a humanitarian catastrophe”.

“We expect the Russian peacekeeping force in Nagorno-Karabakh to take clear action to resolve the situation and prevent further war casualties.”Armenian diplomacy was added.

For its part, the Kremlin on Saturday called on MM. Pashinyan and Putin have twice discussed the Nagorno-Karabakh situation, the day before and the day before.

The Nagorno-Karabakh mountain range, populated mainly by Armenians, was supported by Yerevan, which seceded from Azerbaijan in the fall of the Soviet Union, leading to the First War in the 1990s, killing 30,000 people and creating hundreds of thousands of refugees.

A new conflict erupted in the fall of 2020, killing 6,500 people in six weeks. This ended in a crushing defeat for Armenia, forcing Azerbaijan to cede three areas that form a glacier around Nagorno-Karabakh.

Read our review: The article is reserved for our subscribersBetween Baku and Yerevan, increasing risks

World with AFP

https://www.balkantravellers.com/russia-has-accused-azerbaijan-of-violating-the-ceasefire-agreement-with-armenia-in-the-nagorno-karabakh-region/


Azerbaijan Slams Russia’s Accusation Of Breaking Ceasefire In Conflict With Armenia

Written By

Dipaneeta Das

IMAGE: AP


After Moscow accused Azerbaijani forces of violating the ceasefire in the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, Baku on Saturday urged Moscow to ensure Armenian troops are removed from internationally recognised territories of Azerbaijan. The matter was brought forward during a brief meeting between defence ministers of Russia and Baku, where Azerbaijan clarified their positions and locations of deployment of its armed forces. The meeting followed Russia’s first-ever public rebuke to Azerbaijan for defying the Russian peacekeeping mission’s zone in Nagorno-Karabakh.

“Violating the provisions of the trilateral statement of the leaders of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia from November 9, 2020, Azerbaijan’s armed forces between March 24 and March 25 entered the zone of responsibility of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in Nagorno-Karabakh and set up an observation post,” the Russian Ministry of Defence said in a statement.

Moscow also claimed that Azerbaijan troops used Turkish-made drones to launch an attack on Karabakh troops, killing at least 3 people, as the situation rapidly spiralled downward in the region, RT News reported. In response, Baku “regretted the one-sided statement” by the Russian Ministry of Defence, which it said, “failed to reflect the truth.” In addition, Azerbaijan also refuted Russia’s allegations, stating it “did not violate a single provision” of the Russia-brokered trilateral Ceasefire Accord signed between Armenia and Azerbaijan in 2020. The peace accord aimed to end hostilities in the conflict-ridden territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.

READ | Putin meets with Armenia and Azerbaijan leaders over ceasefire; calls it ‘constructive’

“This statement by the Russian Ministry of Defense contradicts the nature of bilateral relations and the Declaration of Allied Cooperation signed between the two countries on February 22, 2022,” the statement said, as quoted by Ukrinform, adding that Russia must “ensure the complete withdrawal of the remnants of the Armenian army and illegal Armenian armed groups from the internationally recognized territories of Azerbaijan.”
 

Nevertheless, the peace deal did not completely eliminate skirmishes between the arch enemies. On multiple occasions, both fronts engaged in clashes with the frequency increased manifold in recent days. On Saturday, it was Russia’s first formal accusation against one party violating the brokered deal since the end of the conflict over Karabakh in November 2020. Earlier on Thursday and Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday held two rounds of talks with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Kremlin informed.

Russia urges Azerbaijan to pull back from Nagorno-Karabakh

The eruption of violence also coincides with the Russian invasion of Ukraine marking a month, while both sides continue to dig for common ground in a bid to ensure a peace treaty. Noting the uprising scenarios that could lead to potential physical conflict, Moscow urged Azerbaijan to pull back troops from the Russian peacekeeping contingent zone. Russia added that currently, the peacekeepers are in action to “resolve the situation.” Further, the Russian defence ministry appealed to all parties “to exercise restraint and ensure strict compliance with the existing tripartite agreement.”

https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/rest-of-the-world-news/azerbaijan-slams-russias-accusation-of-breaking-ceasefire-in-conflict-with-armenia-articleshow.html

"Anti-Russian front in Caucasus?" – Moscow and Baku exchange accusations amid escalation in Karabakh




  • JAMnews
  • Baku

Baku criticized Moscow’s statement amid escalation in Karabakh

The leadership of Azerbaijan sharply criticized the recent statement of the Russian Defense Ministry regarding the aggravation of the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Baku’s main claim is that Armenian armed formations have not yet withdrawn from the territory of Azerbaijan (in the Karabakh zone), which is temporarily controlled by Russian peacekeepers. Meanwhile, this condition is included as one of the points of the tripartite statement that ended the second Karabakh war in the fall of 2020.

Baku also reminds the Russian Ministry of Defense that it should not use the name “Nagorno-Karabakh” at all, since there is no such administrative-territorial unit on the territory of Azerbaijan.

At the same time, a message was published that Azerbaijan would soon restore gas supply to Khankendi (in Armenia this city is called Stepanakert) and adjacent settlements.


  • “We must investigate actions of Russian peacekeepers”: PM Pashinyan’s appeal to Putin
  • Op-ed: Abkhazia finds itself in a new geopolitical reality
  • War between Russia and Ukraine: which side is Azerbaijan on?

On the evening of March 26, the Russian Ministry of Defense in its newsletter announced a violation of the terms of the tripartite statement of November 10, 2020, which put an end to the second Karabakh war.

Meanwhile, according to reports from Khankendi (Stepanakert), the situation in the part of Karabakh where Russian peacekeepers are stationed has not changed. The Azerbaijani Armed Forces are holding the positions they occupied on March 24 – the village of Farrukh and the height of Dashbashi.

Escalation in Nagorno-Karabakh, as the Armenian Foreign Ministry reports that “Azerbaijani invasion in the zone of reponsibility of Russian peacekeepers continues”. Baku refutes Armenia’s reports

“The Russian peacekeeping contingent continues to carry out tasks in the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.

From March 24 to March 25, the armed forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan, violating the provisions of the tripartite statement of the leaders of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia dated November 9, 2020, entered the zone of responsibility of the Russian peacekeeping contingent on the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh and set up an observation post. Four strikes were made by an unmanned aerial vehicle of the Bayraktar-TB 2 type on units of the armed formations of Nagorno-Karabakh in the area of the FURUKH settlement.

At present, the command of the Russian peacekeeping contingent is taking measures to resolve the situation and return the troops to their original position. An appeal has been sent to the Azerbaijani side for the withdrawal of troops”, says the information bulletin of the Russian Ministry of Defense on the activities of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in the zone of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Immediately after the publication of this bulletin, a sharply negative response from the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan was issued.

“The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Azerbaijan regrets the one-sided statement of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation dated , which does not correspond to reality”, the press service of the Defense Ministry of Azerbaijan reported.

“On March 25, during a telephone conversation between Defense Minister Colonel-General Zakir Hasanov and Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, the situation in Azerbaijan, where the Russian peacekeeping contingent is temporarily stationed, was discussed. During the conversation, the Azerbaijani side stated that the positions and locations at the sites are being specified.

However, on the morning of March 26, members of the illegal Armenian armed groups attempted to sabotage the units of the Azerbaijani army. As a result of immediate measures, members of the illegal Armenian armed groups were forced to retreat.

Azerbaijan is committed to the tripartite statement of November 10, 2020 and has not violated any of its provisions.

Unfortunately, in accordance with paragraph 4 of this statement, the complete withdrawal of the remnants of the Armenian army and illegal Armenian armed formations from the territory of Azerbaijan has not yet been carried out. Therefore, it is Armenia, and not Azerbaijan, that violates the provisions of the statement.

This statement by the RF Ministry of Defense contradicts the essence of bilateral relations and the Declaration on Allied Interaction signed between the two countries on February 22, 2022.

There is no administrative-territorial unit called “Nagorno-Karabakh” on the territory of Azerbaijan. The village mentioned in the statement is not called Furukh, but Farrukh.

In connection with the above, the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Azerbaijan calls on the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to ensure the complete withdrawal of the remnants of the Armenian army and illegal Armenian armed formations from the territories of Azerbaijan recognized by the international community, in accordance with the provisions of the tripartite statement. It also asks to abstain from using the term “Nagorno-Karabakh” and correctly indicate the names of the territories of Azerbaijan”, the statement says.

On Sunday morning, March 27, the Azerigaz Production Association, which is responsible for the distribution of natural gas in Azerbaijan, announced the imminent restoration of gas supply to Khankendi (in Armenia this city is called Stepanakert) and adjacent settlements.

The issue of providing natural gas to the part of Karabakh, where Russian peacekeepers are stationed, has recently become more acute and must be neogitated between Baku and Yerevan, an expert believes

“In recent days, the failure of gas distribution lines in the Karabakh economic region, which have been operating without repair for many years, has caused problems in gas supply.

Despite the heavy snowfall, Azerigaz employees are taking the necessary measures to eliminate the consequences of the accident despite complexity of the local terrain.

On March 28, the supply of natural gas to Khankendi and other nearby settlements will be restored, and first of all, tests will be carried out. In this regard, consumers are advised to be careful when using natural gas and strictly observe safety regulations.

After the completion of the tests on March 29, the supply of natural gas to the territory of the Karabakh economic region will be fully restored”, Azerigaz said in a statement.

In the Azerbaijani segment of social media, the latest events in the part of Karabakh, where the Russian peacekeeping contingent is deployed, are being actively discussed.

“Currently, about 30,000 Armenians live in Nagorno-Karabakh. Most of Nagorno-Karabakh, the main strategic heights are under the control of the Azerbaijani army.

The Lachin corridor is beyond the control of our army, but Lachin has nothing to do with the territory where the Armenians live. In a word, now Nagorno-Karabakh is in the position of an enclave.

One of the key countries in the South Caucasus is Turkey, which is a member of NATO and an ally of Azerbaijan. Armenia is located between Azerbaijan and Turkey, and in the post-Putin period it will be forced to take into account our interests. The West is also aware of these realities.

In Joe Biden’s letter to Ilham Aliyev on the occasion of the Novruz holiday, democracy was first mentioned. Another noteworthy fact in that letter was that the US President never mentioned the OSCE Minsk Group. Although in a similar letter last year he dwelled on the Minsk Group in detail.

All this is due to the fact that the West is aware of the realities, and the United States, first of all, recognizes the territorial integrity and inviolability of Azerbaijan’s borders as a factor in the peace process.


The progressive world, and primarily the West, today does not need the opening of a second front and the spread of the Ukrainian conflict to other regions. This tension is beneficial to Putin only.


Tension in Nagorno-Karabakh is also beneficial to the opposition of Armenia, led by Kocharyan. They understand that Putin does not want to give Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan anyway and will not withdraw his troops from there in the near future…

We will subsequently be accused of ethnic cleansing and inciting ethnic intolerance – both now and in the post-Putin period. But after Putin’s departure from the political arena, Nagorno-Karabakh will still remain the territory of Azerbaijan.

We should just avoid spoiling the situation now. After the military successes of 2020, our main concern should be the recognition of Azerbaijan as a supporter of peace, adherent to the international law, the principle of inviolability of the territorial integrity of states and interstate borders, respecting good neighborly relations and able to ensure a common life with ethnic groups of the population.

Unlike the Aliyevs and those who are unable to see the future of these processes, the Azerbaijani people need democracy. Azerbaijan must and will become democratic. This is our main task for today and tomorrow”, Azer Gasimly, head of the Institute of Political Management, wrote on social media.

The head of the Atlas analytical center, political scientist Elkhan Shahinoglu, draws attention to the tone of the message of the Russian Ministry of Defense:

The Ally is trying to scare us. The message deliberately uses the expressions “Nagorno-Karabakh” and “Nagorno-Karabakh Republic”. In fact, none of them are illegal.

We are entering a new stage of the information war. We have plenty of arguments, and we just have to use these tools.”

Expert Elchin Efendi warns Russia about underestimating the balance of power and warns against a clash with Azerbaijan:

“Any clash between Russia and Azerbaijan at the present time will deliver a final blow to Russia.

First, Azerbaijan is an ally of Russia and its main supporter in the Caucasus in economic terms.

Secondly, during the days of the second Karabakh war, Russia saw perfectly well what the Azerbaijani army was capable of.

Thirdly – the Shusha Declaration. Turkey is our military ally, and the inclusion of Turkey in clashes automatically means the inclusion of NATO in it.

Fourthly, a second front against Russia may appear in the Caucasus.

Fifth, there will be pressure from Azerbaijani businessmen living in Russia”.

Book: Midlands Voices: Omaha, the Armenians and today

Omaha World Herald
Nebraska,

he Omaha Daily Bee, on April 23, 1909, reported on the front page Muslim massacres of Christian Armenians in the Adana province of Turkey, also known then as the Ottoman Empire.

The article in the local paper ran opposite an article on the price of wheat. These massacres, more than a riot but less than a full genocide, are mostly unknown in the U.S. today. They are recalled in a detailed new book by University of Nebraska-Lincoln professor Bedross Der Matossian, titled “The Horrors of Adana: Revolution and Violence in the Early Twentieth Century” and was just published by Stanford University Press.

History for the sake of history is important. One can learn that the Adana massacres were preceded by other Turkish violence against the Armenians especially in 1895-96. Adana was followed by a real Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turks (and Kurds) centered on 1915 during World War I. Historians debate the connections among the three episodes. Der Matossian does not see tight linkage; some others do. I am not a historian, although I read a lot of it, and I primarily want to know if Adana offers lessons for today.For Der Matossian, the fall of the Sultan in 1908 and the coming to power in Istanbul of the “Young Turk” government opened society for more freedom. But this freedom allowed deep tensions to surface. Instead of social media and fake news, there were rumors of an Armenian uprising. The old guard Muslims, fearing for their status, and in the wake of a failed counter coup against the Young Turks, exploded in fury against the local Armenians in the region of Adana who were doing well locally in the cotton trade. Perhaps 20,000 Armenians were killed as compared to about 2,000 Muslims.

Events were widely reported, but the outside powers with gun boats off the coast in the Mediterranean did not intervene. They feared rivalries among themselves, getting stuck in a broader involvement and maybe even a restoration of the repressive Sultanate. Better to leave the Young Turks in charge of things. They and others did provide humanitarian assistance after the fact.

Lesson No. 1: Freedom without consensus and compromise is dangerous. Especially dangerous is an old guard that fears further loss of status and privilege, especially in the context of conspiracy theories or more simply ill-founded rumors. Violence is likely when some “other” is seen as pernicious, even treasonous. In 1909 in Adana, the Muslim notables and Imams belonging to the ancien régime saw the Armenians, exercising their new freedoms to organize and advocate, as meriting a violent comeuppance. The result was widespread death and destruction.

In the U.S. today, White supremacist militias are a reality. The Department of Homeland Security has said they constitute the most important terrorist threat facing the U.S. They tried to take over the Jan. 6, 2021, events leading to mob violence at the Capitol in Washington, D.C. They see particularly the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, if not all that party, as dangerous to the American Republic, not at all a legitimate and loyal opposition party, and hence to be opposed with force. To put it mildly, this situation is dangerous.

Public opinion polls show a deeply divided country, with the moderate center having withered away. The Republican Party has moved very far right. Some of its leaders said nice things about neo-Nazis in Charlottesville, Virginia, during disturbances in 2017. Some propagate the myth about a stolen election, undermining a core democratic value. The Democratic Party has become slightly more left. Some of its leaders talk of defunding the police.

This deepening divide requires urgent attention. American stability, even genuine democracy, is very much at risk. Mitt Romney has had the courage to speak out about the fragility of democracy. We need more like him to address deep fissures in the U.S. with a declining consensus. All independent indices show declining democracy, aka political freedom, in America.

Lesson No. 2: Even widely reported atrocities, such as mass murder, do not necessarily result in humanitarian intervention to protect civilians. The Adana massacres of 1909, although forgotten in the American heartland as elsewhere, were widely covered at the time by newspapers in Turkey, the Arab world, Europe and North America — including Omaha. But ruling elites in outside nations processed the news according to their national interests as defined at the time. The U.S. government back then did not see any reason to get involved, although the American Red Cross provided some humanitarian assistance.

Today, terrible atrocities in places like Myanmar (formerly Burma), Ethiopia, South Sudan, Yemen and elsewhere do not lead to decisive action to stop the killing of civilians and other mass atrocities. Even before Ukraine took all air out of the global humanitarian response system in 2022, powerful outside states avoided deep involvement in most nasty violent conflicts. They were wary of quagmires and forever wars and more big expenditures.

Race and religion also played a role, witness European willingness to accept millions of Ukrainian refugees whereas these same European states — especially Hungary and Poland — had been much less welcoming to Syrian refugees. Syrian refugees too had been victimized by merciless Russian bombing and even use of chemical weapons.

The global humanitarian response system is much better organized than in 1909, both through the United Nations, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and others like Doctors Without Borders. We read of the commendable actions of the UN High Commissioner of Refugees and UNESCO for example.

As I write, the President of the International Committee of the Red Cross is in Ukraine trying to limit the violence. Arranging humanitarian corridors has its value: better to have refugee flows than mass murder. But state calculations of national interest still dominate, often to the detriment of civilian victims. That has not much changed since 1909. Even a real Armenian genocide later did not provoke outside intervention, although by 1915, World War I complicated matters enormously.

Professor Der Matossian, an Armenian born in Jerusalem, came to UNL in 2010. He knows the Middle East well. He has written a carefully researched account of Adana in 1909, relying on numerous sources in multiple languages. Historians will find it useful for many reasons.

The rest of us benefit from thinking about what the events of 1909 might tell us about our world of today. As often said, history does not exactly repeat itself. But sometimes it seems to come close.

David P. Forsythe is UNL professor emeritus of political science, specializing in international human rights and humanitarian affairs.

https://omaha.com/opinion/columnists/midlands-voices-omaha-the-armenians-and-today/article_5cbb5998-abb1-11ec-bebc-476991d3107f.html

Russia says Azerbaijan pulls out from peacekeepers’ zone in Nagorno-Karabakh


Reuters

Azerbaijan has withdrawn its forces from a zone policed by Russian peacekeepers in the Nagorno-Karabakh region, Russia’s defence ministry said on Sunday. Moscow on Saturday accused Azerbaijan of violating a 2020 peace agreement by entering the zone and striking positions of Nagorno-Karabakh army with drones, although Azerbaijan refuted Russia’s version of events.

“As a result of negotiations the Azeri side has carried out a withdrawal of its units from the area of the Farukh village,” Russia’s defence ministry said in a statement. The Azeri defence ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/1979382-russia-says-azerbaijan-pulls-out-from-peacekeepers-zone-in-nagorno-karabakh

Russia says Azeri troops pull back from Karabakh village

Al-Arabiya, UAE

AFP

Russia said Sunday that Azerbaijan had pulled back troops from a Karabakh village following talks after Moscow accused Baku of violating a ceasefire.

“The Azerbaijani side carried out the withdrawal of its units from near the settlement of Farukh,” the Russian defense ministry said in a statement.

The ministry also said Azerbaijan’s troops had twice violated a ceasefire in the Askeran region of the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, and four people had been wounded as a result of a shootout.

For the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

“In cooperation with representatives of the parties to the conflict, the command of the Russian peacekeeping contingent has stabilized the situation,” the statement said.

There was no immediate comment from Azerbaijan.

On Saturday, Moscow accused Azerbaijan of violating a ceasefire agreement by entering the Russian peacekeeping mission’s zone in Karabakh.

In 2020, Armenia and Azerbaijan fought a war over the long-contested enclave which claimed more than 6,500 lives.

A ceasefire deal brokered by Russian President Vladimir Putin saw Yerevan cede swathes of territory, with Russia deploying a peacekeeping contingent to the mountainous region.

The village of Farukh, also known as Parukh, is under control of Russia’s peacekeepers.

On Saturday, Azerbaijan’s defense ministry said it “regretted the one-sided statement of Russia’s defense ministry, which does not reflect the truth,” adding that “Azerbaijan didn’t violate a single provision” of the ceasefire agreement.

A new flare-up in tensions came a month after Putin sent troops to pro-Western Ukraine, with signs indicating that both sides were digging in for a protracted conflict.

Azerbaijan denies troops pullout from peacekeepers’ zone in Nagorno-Karabakh

FXEMPIRE
By:Reuters
Published: Mar 27, 2022, 22:04 GMT+3

(Reuters) – Azerbaijan on Sunday denied pulling out its forces from a zone policed by Russian peacekeepers in the Nagorno-Karabakh region, contradicting a statement by Moscow which had accused Baku of violating a peace agreement by entering the area.

(Reuters) – Azerbaijan on Sunday denied pulling out its forces from a zone policed by Russian peacekeepers in the Nagorno-Karabakh region, contradicting a statement by Moscow which had accused Baku of violating a peace agreement by entering the area.

“There has been no change in the positions of the Azeri army in the village of Farrukh, which is part of the sovereign territories of our country,” the Azeri defence ministry said.

Moscow on Saturday accused Azerbaijan of violating a 2020 peace agreement by entering the zone and striking positions of Nagorno-Karabakh army with drones, although Azerbaijan refuted Russia’s version of events.

On Sunday, the Russian defence ministry said that after negotiations Azerbaijan had withdrawn its forces from the area.

“The information about the withdrawal of units of the Azerbaijani Army from those positions does not reflect the truth. Our army is in full control of the operational situation,” Azerbaijan’s defence ministry said in a statement.

(Reporting by Reuters; editing by Guy Faulconbridge)

https://www.fxempire.com/news/article/azerbaijan-denies-troops-pullout-from-peacekeepers-zone-in-nagorno-karabakh-949057



Sports: Norway vs Armenia prediction, preview, team news and more | International Friendlies 2021-22

Norway and Armenia go head-to-head in a thrilling international friendly fixture at the Ullevaal Stadion on Tuesday.

Armenia head into the game fresh off the back of ending their nine-game winless run and will be looking to build on that performance.

Norway returned to winning ways last Friday as they comfortably saw off Slovakia 2-0 in the first of their two friendly fixtures.

Prior to that, they were on a two-game winless run, claiming one win and one draw from their previous two outings.

Norway head into Tuesday’s game unbeaten in each of their last five home games, claiming three wins and two draws, and will look to keep the ball rolling.

Meanwhile, Armenia ended their dire winless run last time out courtesy of a slender 1-0 victory over Montenegro.

Prior to that, they were on a run of nine games without a win, losing five and claiming four draws in that time.

Armenia are without a win in each of their last six away games and will be looking to end this dry spell.


This will be the third-ever meeting between the two sides. Their first encounter came back in 2000, when the spoils were shared in a goalless draw. Their second meeting came a year later when Norway claimed a comfortable 4-1 victory.

Norway Form Guide: D-W-D-L-W

Armenia Form Guide: D-L-L-L-W

Norway

Norway have all 24 players called-up fit and available following their injury-free game against Slovakia on Friday.

Injured: None

Suspended: None

Armenia

Lucas Zelarayan and Sargis Adamyan are both currently recuperating from injuries, while Styopa Mkrtchyan is suspended.

Injured: Lucas Zelarayan and Sargis Adamyan

Suspended: Styopa Mkrtchyan


Norway Predicted XI (4-3-3): Ørjan Nyland; Birger Meling, Andreas Hanche-Olsen, Kristoffer Ajer, Marcus Pedersen; Morten Thorsby, Mats Møller Dæhli, Martin Ødegaard; Mohamed Elyounoussi, Alexander Sørloth, Erling Haaland

Armenia Predicted XI (4-4-2): David Yurchenko; Kamo Hovhannisyan, Varazdat Haroyan, André Calisir, Kamo Hovhannisyan; Solomon Udo, Khoren Bayramyan, Tigran Barseghyan, Eduard Spertsyan; Vahan Bichakhchyan, Erik Vardanyan


$50 Risk-Free Bet + up to $1,000 Deposit Match at DraftKings SB


Buoyed by their victory over Montenegro, Armenia will head into Tuesday’s game with renewed confidence and look to close out their friendly fixtures on a good note. However, they face a well-balanced Norway side, who claimed a comfortable victory over Slovakia last time out.

We predict Norway will carry the momentum from that result and come away with a win on Tuesday.

Prediction: Norway 2-0 Armenia

As the conflict in Ukraine escalates, Russia’s ally Armenia witnesses bloodshed on its own border.

New York –

As the conflict in Ukraine enters its second month, Russia’s ally Armenia fears a new front opening on its own border with rival Azerbaijan, amid a new round of unrest between the South Caucasus neighbors.

Like Russia and Ukraine, Armenia and Azerbaijan are two post-Soviet nations with a long history of deadly territorial disputes. Their most recent war erupted in September 2020 in the form of a bloody, 44-day conflict focused on the region of Nagorno-Karabakh, where ethnic Armenians established a separatist state called the Artsakh Republic three decades ago on land recognized internationally as part of Azerbaijan.

The latest all-out bout of hostilities in the century-long feud over this soil largely ended with an agreement that allowed Russian peacekeeping forces to enter the battlefield. but as Moscow focuses on what it has deemed to be a “special military operation” against Ukraine, reports are emerging of new conflict in Europe’s southern boundary with Asia.

“Azeri forces аre аttаcking Armeniаn soldiers in Artsаkh аt the moment while I’m speаking,” Hаyk Mаmijаnyаn, а deputy of the Armeniаn pаrliаment аnd secretаry of its “I Hаve Honor” coаlition, told Newsweek.

He cаlled the recent аttаcks а “cleаr violаtion” of the ceаsefire deаl signed between the two sides on November 9, 2020 аnd, “though we’re not reаlly hаppy” with the аgreement to begin with, “even thаt treаty is now violаted.”

Mаmijаnyаn аsserted thаt Azerbаijаn wаs using the situаtion in Ukrаine аs “leverаge” to renew its offensive, “to tаke аdvаntаge” of Russiа’s wаr with аnother neighbor.

“I reаlly hope thаt the world won’t be silent this time,” Mаmijаnyаn sаid. “The world, most of the internаtionаl orgаnizаtions were silent during the 44-dаy wаr, аnd I do hope thаt, despite the inefficiency of the Armeniаn government, internаtionаl orgаnizаtions, аnd the world will pаy аttention to the crimes Azerbаijаn is conducting аt the moment.”

Reаched for comment, the Azerbаijаn Foreign Ministry аnd its embаssy in Wаshington did not immediаtely respond to Newsweek.

The country initiаlly downplаyed the recent reports of clаshes, which the self-proclаimed Artsаkh Republic hаs sаid killed аt leаst two Armeniаn troops so fаr.

The Azerbаijаn Defense Ministry sаid in а stаtement Thursdаy thаt “the situаtion is аrtificiаlly exаggerаted by Armeniаn sources,” lаter аcknowledged thаt some sort of confrontаtion hаd tаken plаce аfter its Russiаn counterpаrt аnnounced thаt Azerbаijаni forces hаd entered the peаcekeeping zone аnd Russiаn Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu held а cаll with Armeniа’s own defense chief, Suren Pаpikyаn, аnd then with thаt of Azerbаijаn, Zаkir Hаsаnov.

Following the lаst cаll, the Azerbаijаn Defense Ministry sаid Sаturdаy thаt “members of illegаl Armeniаn аrmed detаchments аttempted to sаbotаge the Azerbаijаn Army Units” but were then “forced to retreаt” аs а result of countermeаsures. And the ministry sаid Russiа’s own аccount of the events, which bаcked Armeniа’s nаrrаtive, “does not reflect the truth.”

“We regret to inform you thаt the complete withdrаwаl of the remnаnts of the Armeniаn аrmy аnd illegаl Armeniаn аrmed detаchments from the territory of Azerbаijаn in аccordаnce with аrticle 4 of this Stаtement hаs not yet been cаrried out,” the Azerbаijаn Defense Ministry sаid.

“Therefore,” the ministry sаid, “it is Armeniа, not Azerbаijаn, thаt violаtes the provisions of the Stаtement” reаched аs pаrt of lаst yeаr’s ceаsefire deаl.

But mаny Armeniаns feаr the lаtest clаshes mаy be just the beginning of something more ominous, especiаlly аs the internаtionаl community’s sights аre fixаted on the explosive conflict in Ukrаine.

“Of course, this coincidence with the Ukrаiniаn crisis cаnnot be аccidentаl,” Kristine Vаrdаnyаn, аlso а deputy of Armeniа’s nаtionаl аssembly аnd а member of its “Armeniа” bloc, told Newsweek.

She felt thаt, with Russiаn troops mired in Ukrаine, Azerbаijаn wаs looking to seize the opportunity to reignite аn effort “to evict the Armeniаns from Artsаkh by wаr, to deprive the Armeniаns of the opportunity to live in their homelаnd.”

She referenced recent reports of the ethnic Armeniаn residents of Nаgorno-Kаrаbаkh being cut off from utilities by Azerbаijаn in аddition to the more forceful meаsures аllegedly being tаken.

“This is not the only weаpon thаt is used, terrorist tricks аre used аgаinst аbout 120,000 people in Nаgorno Kаrаbаkh every dаy, they аre deprived of gаs, electricity, аnd the internet,” Vаrdаnyаn sаid. “Civiliаns аre often fired upon, urging them to leаve their homes, otherwise promising to seize them by force.”

She аlso points to аnother importаnt аctor involved in the conflict. While Armeniа is аllied with Russiа аs pаrt of the Collective Security Treаty Orgаnizаtion (CSTO), Azerbаijаn shаres а close politicаl, culturаl аnd militаry relаtionship with Turkey аnd she sаid Ankаrа “equаlly shаres аll the responsibility for whаt is hаppening.”

The sаme Bаyrаktаr TB2 drones being used by Ukrаiniаn forces to tаrget Russiаn convoys were previously used by Azerbаijаn to tаke out Armeniаn positions with greаt effect. This very weаpon wаs sаid to be involved in аn аttаck Fridаy thаt killed two Armeniаn troops.

Since the lаtest conflаgrаtion, Vаrdаnyаn sаid “the Armeniаn side hаs more thаn 60 victims аnd dozens of wounded,” mаrking “the most tense situаtion аfter November 9, when Azerbаijаn uses heаvy аrtillery.”

While Turkish President Recep Tаyyip Erdogаn hаs sought to mediаte between Kyiv аnd Moscow, Turkey’s role in Ukrаine’s wаr represents yet аnother source of strаined, yet complex ties between Ankаrа аnd Moscow. Turkey itself is а member of the North Atlаntic Treаty Orgаnizаtion (NATO), а 30-stаte, U.S.-led аlliаnce thаt is deeply involved in the Ukrаine crisis, providing Kyiv with weаpons аnd conducting а globаl cаmpаign of sаnctions аgаinst Moscow in response to its аttаck.

U.S. President Joe Biden wrаpped up а four-dаy trip to Europe on Sаturdаy thаt included meetings with fellow NATO leаders аs pаrt of а bid to unify the аlliаnce’s response to the conflict аnd its humаnitаriаn consequences.

And while the summit wаs centered on Ukrаine, Vаrdаnyаn wаrned the crisis there only highlighted how escаlаtion between nаtions аnywhere in the world could leаd to cаtаstrophe.

“Wаrs аre disаsters. They destroy stаtes, sometimes entire nаtions, destаbilize the region, the world in generаl,” Vаrdаnyаn sаid. “Especiаlly in the conditions of such close ties, when there аre intensive communicаtion, close cooperаtion in different spheres, in аny pаrt of the world, the crisis directly аffects mаny people. We see the best exаmple of thаt now in Ukrаine.”

“The world needs stаbility аnd predictаbility,” she аdded. “There must аlso be stаbility in our region. But we must understаnd thаt this stаbility аnd peаce must be bаsed on justice.”

The United Stаtes hаs sought to tаke а bаlаnced role in the precаrious situаtion between Armeniа аnd Azerbаijаn. Over the pаst week, Secretаry of Stаte Antony Blinken hаs spoken with Armeniаn Prime Minister Nikol Pаshinyаn аnd Azerbаijаni President Ilhаm Aliyev, аnd Stаte Depаrtment spokesperson Ned Price told reporters Fridаy thаt the U.S. hаs reiterаted its position in follow-up conversаtions with officiаls of both sides аs well.

The summаry of the U.S. stаnce, аccording to Price, wаs “wаs cаlling both sides to show restrаint аnd intensify diplomаtic engаgement to find comprehensive solutions to аll of the outstаnding issues.”

“Armeniа аnd Azerbаijаn just need to use direct communicаtion chаnnels to immediаtely de-escаlаte,” Price sаid.

Price аdded thаt the U.S. “remаins deeply committed to working with the sides to аchieve а long-term politicаl settlement of the conflict” аs а member of the Orgаnizаtion for Security аnd Cooperаtion in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group, аlso co-chаired by Frаnce аnd Russiа.

Russiаn President Vlаdimir Putin hаs spoken with the Armeniаn premier twice in recent dаys аnd the Russiаn Foreign Ministry issued а stаtement Sаturdаy аlso cаlling for de-escаlаtion.

“We urge the pаrties to exercise restrаint аnd ensure strict compliаnce with the existing trilаterаl аgreements reаched аt the highest level,” the Russiаn Foreign Ministry sаid.

And just аs both Kyiv аnd Moscow hаve portrаyed their bаttle аs one of not only territoriаl dispute but of civilizаtions, those representing the Armeniа-bаcked Artsаkh Republic, too, see themselves аs being on the front line of а lаrger conflict in history.

Both Russiа аnd Ukrаine hаve set out to portrаy the other аs fаscistic, with Putin going so fаr аs to justify his wаr аs pаrt of аn effort to аchieve the “de-nаzificаtion” of Ukrаine. The Russiаn leаder hаs аccused Ukrаine of tаrgeting ethnic Russiаns, especiаlly in the Moscow-bаcked sepаrаtist stаtes of Donetsk аnd Luhаnsk, which took up аrms аgаinst Kyiv аfter а 2014 uprising thаt sаw а pro-West government tаke power in Ukrаine.

In а similаr vein, Artsаkh Foreign Minister Dаvid Bаbаyаn sаid Azerbаijаn аnd Turkey were chаnneling Nаzi Germаny techniques in аn аlleged аttempt to force out ethnic Armeniаns from their sepаrаtist stаte.

Now, Bаbаyаn told Newsweek thаt “Azerbаijаn is indeed using Russiаn wаr in Ukrаine аs аn opportunity to mаximize its goаls аnd plаns in the region” аs pаrt of а project to estаblish а “pаn-Turkic empire.”

“Besides, the Azerbаijаni-Kаrаbаgh conflict is а chаllenge to the civilized world, too,” Bаbаyаn told Newsweek. “Here we see а dilemmа between vаlues аnd price, ideаls аnd interest. Artsаkh wаs on а brink of destruction, we fаced genocide аnd existentiаl threаts, but we hаve not seen аppropriаte internаtionаl response. This is becаuse ‘price’ prevаils over ‘vаlues,’ interest prevаils over ideаls.

“But this formulа sooner or lаter, it will leаd either to degrаdаtion or destruction,” he аdded, “аs the result of аggression by those whose аggression wаs tolerаted аs the result of the аbove-mentioned dilemmа.”

https://www.cengnews.com/news/as-the-conflict-in-ukraine-escalates-russias-ally-armenia-witnesses-bloodshed-on-its-own-border-361596.html

READ ALSO AT

https://www.thebharatexpressnews.com/as-war-in-ukraine-rages-russias-ally-armenia-sees-bloodshed-on-its-own-border/