RFE/RL Armenian Report – 07/28/2021

                                        Wednesday, July 28, 2021
France Open To Defense Cooperation With Armenia
July 28, 2021
        • Sargis Harutyunyan
Armenia - French Ambassador Jonathan Lacote at a news conference in Yerevan, 
July 12, 2018
France is ready to consider embarking on military cooperation with Armenia that 
would boost the South Caucasus state’s security, the French ambassador in 
Yerevan, Jonathan Lacote, said on Wednesday.
Lacote cautioned at the same time that the two countries are members of 
different military alliances and that France’s top priority in the region is to 
facilitate a peaceful resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict together with 
Russia and the United States, the two other co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group.
“As I said last week in an interview with RFE/RL’s Armenian Service, France is 
willing to examine Armenia’s requests relating to defense,” he told a news 
conference. “But one must also take into account the overall context. First of 
all, France and Armenia are not part of the same military alliance.”
“Generally speaking, our goal is not to prepare for future wars but to prevent 
wars because we believe that regional problems should not be resolved by force,” 
he went on. “The issues of Karabakh’s status and the Armenia-Azerbaijan border 
should be resolved only through negotiations. Any other path would lead to 
deadlock.”
Armenia is allied to Russia through bilateral defense treaties and membership in 
the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization. Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian’s government has pledged to further deepen Russian-Armenian military 
ties since last year’s war in Karabakh.
Lacote spoke with journalists amid fresh fighting on Armenia’s border with 
Azerbaijan which left three Armenian soldiers dead on Wednesday morning.
“Naturally, our thoughts are with the families of the killed soldiers,” he said, 
expressing serious concern at the escalation.
The envoy again called on Armenia and Azerbaijan to resume a “political process” 
that would address Karabakh’s status and lead to the demarcation of their 
border. “But the process must be fair and must take place without any use of 
force,” he said.
The latest fighting erupted at some of the several portions of the border where 
Azerbaijani forces advanced a few kilometers into Armenian territory in May. 
French President Emmanuel Macron has repeatedly demanded their withdrawal.
“We stand in solidarity with Armenia and we will continue to do so,” Macron said 
as he met with Pashinian in Paris on June 1.
Baku maintains that its troops took up new positions on the Azerbaijani side of 
the frontier and did not cross into Armenia.
Armenian Parliament Said To Restrict Press Coverage
July 28, 2021
        • Marine Khachatrian
Armenia -- Photojournalists and cameramen at an official ceremony held in 
Yerevan for newly elected members of the Armenian parliament, January 10, 2019.
An opposition lawmaker claimed on Wednesday that the Armenian authorities are 
planning to ban journalists from physically attending sessions of the country’s 
parliament and impose other restrictions on their work inside the National 
Assembly building.
Taguhi Tovmasian said she has received such information from a reliable source 
and demanded that the parliament staff comment on it. She said the restrictions 
would deal a serious blow to press freedom in Armenia.
“I need explanations,” Tovmasian told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “Why should the 
work of journalists be restricted? Why should journalists watch National 
Assembly sessions only through monitors and be unable to film proceedings on the 
parliament floor? I am told that they want to eliminate the press gallery and 
make sure that journalists cannot approach any deputy [in parliament corridors] 
and ask questions.”
“If we live in a democratic, parliamentary country why would members of its 
parliament avoid being transparent and accountable? What are they afraid of?” 
said the former reporter.
The parliament administration did not immediately confirm or deny Tovmasian’s 
claims, telling RFE/RL’S Armenian Service to submit its questions in writing.
Armenia -- Taguhi Tovmasian, a parliament deputy and the founder of "Zhoghovurd" 
daily, speaks to reporters at the entrance to its offices, Yerevan, December 19, 
2019.
A spokesman for Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s Civil Contract party, Vahagn 
Aleksanian, lent credence to the claims when he strongly defended the 
restrictions listed by the opposition parliamentarian.
“I hope that the National Assembly staff will opt for that,” he wrote on 
Facebook in response to the concerns voiced by Tovmasian.
Aleksanian claimed that parliamentary correspondents have interfered with the 
National Assembly’s activities by “chasing deputies” and ignoring “all ethical 
norms” for the sake of asking “sensationalist questions.”
The new regulations, if confirmed, will apply to press coverage of Armenia’s 
recently elected parliament, which is scheduled to hold its inaugural session on 
August 2. Pashinian’s party will control 71 of the parliament’s 107 seats.
Tovmasian edited a major Armenian newspaper before joining the Pashinian-led My 
Step alliance and becoming a parliament deputy in December 2018. She defected 
from My Step in December 2020 and got reelected to the parliament last month on 
the ticket of an opposition bloc led by former President Serzh Sarkisian.
Armenia -- Deputies from the ruling My Step bloc attend a session of the 
Armenian parliament, Yerevan, January 22, 2021.
Tovmasian insisted that the planned restrictions make mockery of the democratic 
credentials of a government that took office as a result of the “velvet 
revolution” of April-May 2018. She said that the country’s former, supposedly 
less democratic governments never dared to curb journalists’ freedom of movement 
inside the parliament building so drastically.
“A ‘revolutionary’ government that has declared itself a bastion of democracy is 
one by one dismantling all democratic safeguards accumulated by us over the 
years,” said the lawmaker. “I used to work as a parliamentary correspondent for 
many years and I never saw such treatment of journalists.”
Pashinian’s political team faced strong criticism from Armenia’s leading media 
associations in March when it pushed through the parliament a bill tripling 
maximum fines for defamation. President Armen Sarkissian refused to sign the 
bill into law, asking the Constitutional Court to assess its conformity with the 
Armenian constitution.
In February, Armenian prosecutors drafted legislation that would make defamation 
of state officials a crime punishable by up to two years in prison. All forms of 
libel and defamation were decriminalized in Armenia in 2010 during Sarkisian’s 
rule.
Fighting Intensifies On Armenian-Azeri Border (UPDATED)
July 28, 2021
ARMINIA -- An Armenian flag flies at an Armenian army post at the Sotk gold mine 
on the border with Azerbaijan, in Gegharkunik province, June 18, 2021
Three Armenian soldiers were killed and three others wounded in heavy fighting 
with Azerbaijani forces that broke out along the Armenian-Azerbaijani border 
early on Wednesday.
Armenia’s Defense Ministry said Azerbaijani forces attacked at dawn its 
positions in Gegharkunik province bordering the Kelbajar district in Azerbaijan.
“The enemy is trying to improve its positions and create favorable conditions 
for making advances,” the ministry said in a statement. Armenian army units are 
“carrying out combat tasks set for them,” it said, adding that hostilities 
continued as of 8:30 a.m. local time.
Another statement released by the ministry shortly afterwards said the 
Azerbaijani attacks were repelled by 9:20 a.m. “The exchange of gunfire is 
continuing,” it added.
Sources close to the Armenian military claimed that Azerbaijani troops initially 
seized one of its border posts in Gegharkunik. They said the post was recaptured 
by the Armenian side a couple of hours later.
Armenia - Armenian soldiers take up positions on the border with Azerbaijan, May 
17, 2021.
The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry said, meanwhile, that its troops took “adequate 
measures” after coming under cross-border fire in Kelbajar overnight. It said 
two Azerbaijani soldiers were wounded in action.
Later in the morning the two sides agreed, with Russian mediation, to stop the 
fighting that reportedly involved mortar fire.
“The agreement is largely respected at the moment,” the Defense Ministry in 
Yerevan reported at noon. It insisted that “no change in the line of contact 
occurred” as a result of the deadly clashes.
One Azerbaijani soldier was killed and three Armenian servicemen wounded in 
skirmishes reported from the same border sections last Friday. Azerbaijani 
troops had advanced a few kilometers into in Gegharkunik in mid-May, provoking a 
continuing standoff with Armenian army units.
Armenia - An Armenian military commander inspects troops deployed in Gegharkunik 
province bordering Azerbaijan, May 20, 2021.
The latest fighting is one of the most serious armed incidents in the 
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone since last fall’s Armenian-Azerbaijani war in 
Karabakh stopped by a Russian-brokered ceasefire. The Armenian Defense Ministry 
said the Azerbaijani side provoked it ahead of “negotiations planned in Moscow.” 
It did not elaborate.
The Interfax news agency reported that Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu 
will host talks between his Armenian and Azerbaijani counterparts later on 
Wednesday. Shoigu reportedly met with Armenia’s acting Defense Minister Arshak 
Karapetian in Moscow on Monday.
The Armenian Foreign Ministry accused Baku of deliberately heightening tensions 
on the border. It said Armenia will use all “military-political instruments” at 
its disposal to protect its territorial integrity.
For its part, Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry said Yerevan should stop “military 
provocations” and start talks with Baku on demarcating the border between the 
two states.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

After Attack on Armenia, Rep. Chu Calls for End to Azerbaijan’s Military Aid

July 28 2021

By News Desk

Rep. Judy Chu (CA-27) issued the following statement:

After initiating a war last year, Azerbaijan is continuing to act aggressively and violently toward Armenia, despite the cease fire agreement. Wednesday’s attack that killed three Armenian soldiers is the latest example of Azerbaijan’s commitment to aggression, and that is why the US must cease our support for their military which enables such violence.

I’m proud to be a cosponsor of Rep. Frank Pallone’s amendment to the State and Foreign Operations appropriations bill that would end all Foreign Military Financing for Azerbaijan. Today, as the House debates this bill, we will have the chance to put the US on the right side of this issue by ending this aid and pressuring Azerbaijan to stop their war mongering and violence.

I urge my colleagues to support this important amendment that will bring peace and save lives.

Winery: Zorah, Armenia

Jancis Robinson
July 28 2021





Caroline Gilby MW is a wine writer, Eastern European wine specialist and author of The wines of Bulgaria, Romania and Moldova as well as winner of Prix de L’OIV 2020. Her old-vines competition entry is about a vineyard so remote, high and ancient that no one knows when it was planted. See our WWC21 guide for more old-vine competition entries. 

“What have you done to us?” my lungs seemed to gasp as I set off on the Armenia trail half marathon from a little winery in the mountains called Zorah. I thought I was fit but we were 1400 metres high, and the air was distinctly thinner than I was used to. The race was going even higher, over 1600 metres, passing a little plot of grapevines that time forgot on its way. The altitude matters because it shows how far off the beaten track this vineyard is, perched up in the mountains, where there are few people apart from wandering shepherds. Up here, the vines were so remote they survived waves of politics in a region where politics and wine are never far from each other. They hung on through Stalin’s programme of collectivisation of viticulture in the service of brandy that was the designated role for Armenia’s vineyards. Later, in the mid 1980s they were too far away to be worth the effort of pulling out in the face of Gorbachev’s anti-alcohol programme. The other factor that allowed these ancient vines to survive is absence of Phylloxera (the vine root louse that destroyed most of Europe’s vines in the 19th century), though no one quite knows why it failed to munch its way as far as Armenia’s Highlands. Seriously cold, continental winters and very dry, warm summers may have been factors, though it may simply be luck that hasn’t yet run out – as the louse is busy marching across the Ararat Valley not far away.

These venerable vines are an indigenous Armenian variety called Areni or Areni Noir. It’s been traced back to medieval vines from an abandoned monastery site, but may be much older, and has no identified parentage. And the lack of that pernicious Phylloxera meant that all anyone had to do to create more vines was to bury a shoot in the soil, so the plants may be centuries old. There are no ordered rows here, nor posts and wires, just higgledy-piggledy vines sprawling over and around rocks. When Zorik Gharibian (the owner of Zorah) wanted to buy these grapes and later the land itself, he sent out a couple of locals in rusty Ladas with envelopes of cash, to avoid alerting anyone to foreign interest, “The locals see me as dollar signs,” he says. 

Altitude also came into the story when I went to climb the 5137 metre Mount Ararat with Zorik to launch the wine produced from these ancient vines. It’s a rite of pilgrimage for Armenians to climb their spiritual mountain, even though it lies over the border in Turkey and it seemed the right place for Zorik to launch his dream wine. It is named Yeraz which means ‘dream’ as well as being his wife’s name. A few drops of wine were sprinkled as a libation in the snow at the top of the mountain then we shared the rest of the bottle. There’s something about these pensioner vines that gives incredible depth and vivid complexity to the wine, along with lingering elegance and a gorgeous ethereal nose. Not quite like anything else, but if you think cru Burgundy mixed with a dash of top Sangiovese, it will guide you in the right direction. 

No one knows how old these vines are, but I’d like to think they are channelling the spirit of Armenia’s 6000-year wine history. You can see the cliffs that hide the Areni-1 cave from the Yeraz vineyard. This karst cave is the location of the oldest winery ever discovered. It’s a spine-tingling place to visit, full of wine jars that look just a few decades old, not six millennia. The jars are surrounded by a rudimentary grape press and grave caskets, and there’s evidence of sacrifice too. Wine has clearly had a central role in human ritual for a very long time. It’s unlikely to have been the same vines, but maybe people were growing grapes in this remote spot even then. 

Oh, and the race … I came second.   

The photo above is provided by the winery with kind permission for us to use.

Armenia wants Russian outposts on Azerbaijan border amid tensions

Independent, UK
July 29 2021


‘Given the current situation, I think it makes sense to consider the question of stationing outposts of Russian border guards along the entire length of the Armenian-Azeri border’

Tom Balmforth

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Thursday proposed that Russian border forces be stationed along the length of Armenia’s border with Azerbaijan amid rising tensions between Yerevan and Baku, the TASS news agency reported.

Armenia and Azerbaijan accused each other earlier on Thursday of flouting a Russian-backed ceasefire that both sides had accepted the previous day to halt deadly clashes over their joint border which Yerevan wants demarcated.

“Given the current situation, I think it makes sense to consider the question of stationing outposts of Russian border guards along the entire length of the Armenian-Azeri border,” Mr Pashinyan was quoted as saying at a government meeting.

He said that Yerevan was preparing to discuss that proposal with Moscow and that the move would allow work to be carried out on the demarcation and delimitation of the border without the risk of military clashes.

Armenia’s defence ministry said earlier that Azeri troops had opened fire on Armenian positions at the Gegharkunik section of the border in the early hours of Thursday morning, prompting Armenia to return fire. It described the situation as calm as of 07:00 in a statement.Azerbaijan’s defence ministry said that Armenian forces had opened fire with machine guns and grenade launchers in the direction of a village in the Kelbajar region, and had thrown hand grenades. It said its forces returned fire in a statement.

The ceasefire was called on Wednesday after one of the deadliest border incidents since last year’s six-week war between ethnic Armenian forces and Baku over the Nagorno-Karabakh region and surrounding areas.

Armenia said that three of its soldiers had been killed with four of them injured. Azerbaijan said that two of its soldiers had been wounded.

In fighting from last September to November, Azeri troops drove ethnic Armenian forces out of swathes of territory they had controlled since the 1990s in and around the Nagorno-Karabakh region, before Russia brokered a ceasefire.

A simmering border dispute between the two has since flared up, with both sides accusing each other of separate incursions into each others’ territory in recent months, highlighting the fragility of the ceasefire.

Reuters

Armenia PM calls for Russian troops on border with Azerbaijan

Deutsche Welle, Germany
July 29 2021

Armenia has previously accused Azerbaijan of making incursions into its territory, and is looking to Moscow for help in securing its side of the border.

Russian peacekeepers have been deployed to monitor Nagorno-Karabakh

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Thursday asked Russia to deploy troops to the country’s border with regional adversary Azerbaijan. 

The request comes after three Armenian soldiers were killed in cross-border fighting with Azerbaijani forces on Wednesday, with both countries later agreeing to a ceasefire proposal from Russia.

Soldiers from both Armenia and Azerbaijan were wounded in the clashes.

“I think it makes sense to consider the question of stationing outposts of Russian border guards along the entire stretch of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border,” Pashinyan told Cabinet members.

The Armenia leader believes the deployment of Russian forces will help the two countries “carry out work on demarcation and delimitation of the border without the risk of military clashes.”

“We are planning to discuss the matter with our Russian colleagues,” Pashinyan added.

The Kremlin has not yet agreed to the border proposal, but spokesperson Dmitri Peskov said discussions with Yerevan would continue on the matter.

Armenia has also previously accused Azerbaijani troops of making incursions into its territory in May. Baku denies the claims.

Tensions have escalated between the countries after they fought a six-week war over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh last year, which killed around 6,500 people.

Pashinyan signed a Moscow-brokered truce in November to end the fighting, which gave parts of the enclave to Azerbaijan. Many Armenians regarded the move as capitulation by Pashinyan, yet the Armenian prime minister managed to secure another term during parliamentary elections in June. 

Russia has deployed thousands of peacekeepers to monitor potential hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Russia is a key partner of Armenia, with both countries being members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) military alliance.

wd/aw (AP, AFP, dpa)

Armenia and Azerbaijan exchange accusations in renewed clashes

Global Voices
July 29 2021



· Global Voices

Armenia and Azerbaijan exchanged fire on July 28, resulting in the deadliest clash since a Russia-brokered ceasefire ended the 44-day war between Armenia and Azerbaijan in November 2020. The two countries blamed each other for starting the shoot-out and violating the November ceasefire agreement.

According to Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Defense, at least two Azerbaijanian servicemen were wounded. While the Armenian Defense Ministry said three Armenian servicemen were killed and four wounded. The most recent clashes come just days after the two countries traded fire near the Armenian village of Yeraskh and the Azerbaijani village of Heydarabad.

Leyla Abdullayeva, spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Azerbaijan said in a tweet that Armenia bore the responsibility for recent clashes:

Meanwhile, Armenia’s Ministry of Defense said, “All responsibility for the aggravation of the situation lies with the military-political leadership of Azerbaijan.” While the country’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that “the Azerbaijani side has been deliberately initiating escalation.”

Later that day, both sides agreed to deescalate tensions in a move proposed by Russia.

Earlier in July, both the EU and the US urged the two sides to reduce tensions.

The United States is concerned about incidents along the Armenian-Azerbaijani border, especially…

Posted by U.S. Embassy Yerevan on Tuesday, July 20, 2021

Last year’s war claimed at least 6,900 lives. The ceasefire signed in November saw Azerbaijan regain control over all seven adjacent districts and parts of Nagorno-Karabakh previously controlled by ethnic Armenians.

Iran willing to broker lasting peace between Azerbaijan, Armenia: Statement

Al Ahram, Egypt
July 29 2021

Xinhua , Thursday 29 Jul 2021

Iran’s foreign ministry urged on Thursday neighboring Azerbaijan and Armenia to overcome tensions and conflicts, and vowed to offer “any kind of assistance” to broker a lasting peace between the two countries.

In a statement published on the ministry’s official website, spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh expressed Iran’s concern over continuing border clashes between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

The Iranian official voiced regret over the deaths and injuries endured by both countries, and stressed the need for mutual restraint and the respect of internationally recognized borders.

On Wednesday, both Azerbaijan and Armenia confirmed the two sides recently engaged in a new border clash, which caused casualties from both sides.

Iran expresses concern over new Azerbaijan-Armenia clashes

Mehr News Agency, Iran
July 29 2021

TEHRAN, Jul. 29 (MNA) – Saeed Khatibzadeh, Iranian Foreign Ministry’s Spokesman on Thursday expressed regret over the casualties in the recent escalation of conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, voicing Iran’s readiness to help establish peace.

Saeed Khatibzadeh, the spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on Thursday expressed concern over the continuation of border clashes between the Azerbaijan and Armenia troops at the shared borders.

Khatibzadeh expressed regret over the losses of lives and injuries of people from both countries and called on both sides to show restraint and stressed the need for peaceful settlement of border disputes.

The Iranian spokesman also stressed the need for the two countries to get over the tensions and conflicts and the need for all parties to respect the internationally recognized borders. 

He further stressed the need to achieve perpetual peace in the South Caucasus region as soon as possible, while expressing the readiness of Islamic Republic of Iran to help them to establish sustainable peace in the region.

KI/14000507000406

Fate of ex-Soviet exclaves uncertain in the wake of Armenia-Azerbaijan war | Eurasianet

EurasiaNet.org
July 29 2021
Heydar Isayev Jul 29, 2021

Bakhtiyar Hidayat, a poet and teacher, harbors romantic memories of his former home and its abundance. 

“You simply didn’t have to work,” he recalls. “A couple of cows in your yard was enough to live on for a year and still provide milk and cheese and yogurt for your relatives in the rest of the country.”

That was in Upper Askipara, a village that came under Armenian control during the first Karabakh war with Azerbaijan in the 1990s. As a result, Hidayat and all the nearly 500 Azerbaijani residents of the village were forced to flee. He and many other residents now live just over the border in the settlement of Narimanov, near the regional capital of Gazakh.

Bakhtiyar Hidayat (Heydar Isayev)

He tried to resume his dairy production at his new home, but he laments that the nature just isn’t the same and his milk isn’t as tasty as it used to be. 

“Dairy from Askipara was a brand,” he said. “Milk, butter, cheese, shor [an Azerbaijani curd cheese], you name it – villagers would take it to the market in Gazakh and people would stop them and buy it on the way – and for a good price.”

Azerbaijan’s victory in last year’s war with Armenia has raised hopes among those displaced from Upper Askipara and other nearby areas that they will be able to return to their homes. “As soon as they announce that the villages have been returned, no one will stay here” in Narimanov, he told Eurasianet.

Upper Askipara is one of what is known among Azerbaijanis as the “seven villages,” territories on the northern edge of the Armenia-Azerbaijan border that Armenians took control of in the 1990s. The villages at issue here are distant from and far smaller than the main territory under contention: Karabakh and the surrounding regions. But their status could also be in play as the two sides prepare to negotiate over a formal border and a final resolution to the conflict.

Four of the seven villages – Baghanis Ayrim, Lower Askipara, Kheyrimli, and Gizilhajili – were on the Azerbaijani side of the border between the two former Soviet republics, and were occupied by Armenian forces in the 1990s. Upper Askipara, along with two more villages – Sofulu and Barkhudarli – are oddities of Soviet border-drawing: village-sized exclaves of one former Soviet Socialist Republic inside the borders of another. 

Gazakh’s local government has reported that there are 4,136 displaced people from the Armenian-controlled villages of the district. Many of them live in state-provided housing in Narimanov or have moved to Baku or other cities.

Another Azerbaijani exclave, Karki, is further to the south, near Nakhchivan. And there is one Armenian exclave, Artsvashen, inside Azerbaijan; in the 1990s its Armenian residents faced a similar fate to those on the other side of the border.

To swap or return?

In initial reports about the November 10 ceasefire statement that ended last year’s war, the agreement contained language stipulating the “return to the Azerbaijani side the territory held by the Armenian side in the Gazakh region of the Azerbaijani republic.” In the document that was formally published, however, that line had been deleted.

But the following day Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the president of Azerbaijan’s closest ally Turkey, referred to “the return of the Gazakh villages” in a speech to parliament. On November 27, in a meeting with Azerbaijanis displaced from the “seven villages,” the head of the Gazakh local government, Rajab Babashov, said that the villages at issue would be “liberated from occupation” soon, which he said was “indicated in the ceasefire statement.” Babashov’s statement was later removed from the official Gazakh website. 

Central government authorities in both Baku and Yerevan have been relatively silent about the fate of the exclaves, but in May, an Armenian opposition source claimed to have documents showing that Armenia intended to hand over the Gazakh villages – which they generally just refer to as “the exclaves” – to Azerbaijan. The areas are especially sensitive to Armenia, as they abut the main road between Yerevan and Tbilisi, Armenia’s primary artery to the north.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan shortly thereafter said Armenia’s preference would be to exchange the exclaves rather than again take control of land within the other country’s borders. “Artsvashen is under the rule of Azerbaijan,” he said at a June 11 campaign event. “Our logic is that the [formerly Armenian] enclave should be exchanged for [formerly Azerbaijani] enclaves.” 

But Azerbaijan appears interested rather in regaining control of its exclaves inside Armenia, especially Askipara, Barkhudarli, and Sofulu, said Ahmad Alili, a Baku-based analyst at the Caucasus Policy Analysis Center. “They will provide Azerbaijan with strategic advantages, such as the guarantee of safety of the gas pipeline to Georgia and visual observation over transport lines between Yerevan and Tbilisi,” Alili told Eurasianet. He said the government appears interested in resettling those territories even earlier than it does the land it retook in and around Karabakh.

The wrong kind of IDPs

The Azerbaijani former residents of the “seven villages” face unique challenges in getting housing.

While the government spent lavishly to rehouse hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons (IDPs) from the war in the 1990s, that effort was suspended following the 2020 war, even as many IDPs continue to wait for new homes.

One is Husniya Ibrahimova, 74, from Barkhudarli. Over the years, she has had to move frequently while she waits for permanent housing to replace her lost home. Ibrahimova said she has repeatedly written to the authorities to ask for new housing, and has been promised a new apartment.

“For decades I changed houses in Baku either because I couldn’t pay the rent or conditions were too bad,” she told Eurasianet. “Now we live in Sumgait and still we can’t manage the bills, with my grandkids’ tuition and my medication.” 

Now, though, her wait for a new home is going to get even more complicated. President Ilham Aliyev announced in January that IDPs would not get housing anywhere other than what Aliyev called the “liberated lands” retaken in the war. That decision indefinitely deprives Ibrahimova of the prospect of a new home, as she is an IDP but not from a territory reclaimed in the war. 

An official from Azerbaijan’s Committee for Refugee and IDP Affairs told RFE/RL that those displaced from the seven villages will likely be settled in the newly retaken territories instead of in their former hometowns.

Fate of ex-Soviet exclaves uncertain in the wake of Armenia-Azerbaijan war | Eurasianet

From the Armenian side, there is more ambiguity around the prospect of resettlement.

In Karki, which Armenians call Tigranashen, several Armenian families have moved in. One man, who declined to identify himself, told Eurasianet he didn’t believe “rumors” that the village could be given back to Azerbaijan. “This is something the opposition is saying,” he said.

Although former residents of Artsvashen would like to go back, they understand that a trade of the exclaves would be better for Armenia as a whole, the town’s mayor-in-exile, Mamikon Khechoyan, told Eurasianet. “It’s important for our international roads to not go through Azerbaijani villages,” he told Eurasianet. “Especially when the prospect of peace is so far away. People are ready to make that sacrifice.”

“Just like Jews say, ‘next year in Jerusalem,’ now our people say, ‘we’ll meet in Artsvashen,’” he said.

About 3,000 people were displaced from Artsvashen and many of them now live in Chambarak, just over the border in Armenia proper. They have gotten virtually no state support since being displaced but have been promised that, if they can’t return to their former homes as the result of a peace deal, they will be compensated. 

“It would be dangerous to live there, of course, but men my age who were born there would go,” Artik Arakelyan, a 52-year-old farmer who lives in Chambarak, told Eurasianet. “I think 10 percent of people would want to go back to Artsvashen. The majority, though, are waiting for the right opportunity to leave Armenia.”

Artsvashen itself is these days largely abandoned except for military facilities, including a lake stocked with fish to supply the soldiers’ and officers’ canteens. But a few Azerbaijani families moved in following the Armenians’ departure and now do small-scale farming, raising chickens and cattle and growing potatoes.

One is Gabil Taghiyev, who moved here 20 years ago from a nearby border village, Goyalli. The land around the village was mined in the war of the 1990s, making it unsafe to farm, Taghiyev told Eurasianet. In Artsvashen – which Azerbaijanis call Bashkand – he can farm safely, he said. 

Upper Askipara – which Armenians call Verin Voskepar – is also virtually abandoned. Armenian residents from the neighboring village, Nerkin (Lower) Voskepar, farm the land and on a recent visit by Eurasianet, several groups were picnicking near the small river. An Azerbaijani cemetery remains, which appears to be unharmed, avoiding the fate of many graveyards in territories that have changed hands during the two wars.

Fate of ex-Soviet exclaves uncertain in the wake of Armenia-Azerbaijan war | Eurasianet

But the Armenians of the area do not want their former neighbors to come back. “It’s not possible for the Azerbaijanis to come back to their former homes, we’re categorically against it. We’re enemies,” said Spartak Gevorgyan, a resident of Nerkin Voskepar.

The sensitivity around the exclaves was illustrated by tense experiences the reporters for this story had in the various exclaves, where people were uniformly unenthusiastic about speaking to visitors. In Artsvashen, one resident threatened to report a journalist to the police. In Tigranashen, residents immediately asked a visitor to leave, and in Upper Askipara, Eurasianet was chased out by locals and later questioned at length by the security services. 

Meanwhile Bakhtiyar Hidayat, the former Upper Askipara resident, commutes to another city, Aghstafa, to teach history at a school there. Other Upper Askiparans work as day laborers and many of them keep bees on the side, a practice they have maintained from their former village life.

Hidayat has looked up his former home on Google Earth and found it had been destroyed. “It was always a mystery to me as to why they [Armenians] didn’t kill us when we were leaving via Armenian land,” he said. “We were leaving the village for them to use. But then they destroyed it all.”

 

With additional reporting by Joshua Kucera and Ani Mejlumyan

British Kurds, Armenians, Cypriots call for UK sanctions on Turkey

RUDAW, Kurdistan Province, Iraq
July 29 2021

Khazan Jangiz
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region — Kurdish, Armenian, and Cypriot representatives in the United Kingdom this week made an appeal to the British prime minister to impose sanctions on Ankara in order to halt its military activity in the Kurdistan Region, part of what they said is growing Turkish aggression in the region. 

In April, Turkey launched two new major military operations, named Claw-Lightning and Claw-Thunderbolt, against the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in the northern border areas of the Kurdistan Region where the PKK has bases. The goal of the operation is to limit PKK movement, cutting off access to Turkey and northeast Syria. Turkish air and ground forces are involved in the operations and have set up new military outposts on Kurdistan Region soil. Several villages have been emptied as residents fled the conflict, and acres of land have burned in fires sparked by artillery fire. 

Early Thursday morning, Turkish drones bombed near two villages in northern Duhok province.

Three months into the conflict, tensions between the PKK and Kurdistan Region forces have risen, raising fears of civil war. 

“We urge the Government to use its diplomatic position to stop the invasion and prevent an intra-Kurdish war. We particularly ask for the Government to put in place sanctions to be lifted only when Turkey ceases its military operations in South Kurdistan [Kurdistan Region],” read the letter signed by the chairs of Kurdish People’s Democratic Assembly, the National Federation of Cypriots, and the Armenian National Committee in Britain. They delivered it on Wednesday to Downing Street.

“In light of Turkish support for Azerbaijan in the 44-day war with Armenia last year, the Turkish state’s general stance in its bordering regions can only be described as aggressive,” the letter stated. 

“Following Turkey’s devastating invasion of Cyprus in 1974, we are worried about the possibility of history repeating itself if the UK doesn’t do more. Turkey is a fellow NATO country to the UK, and therefore these military actions must be of concern to the Government,” it added.

The PKK is an armed Kurdish group fighting for the increased rights of Kurds in Turkey. Ankara considers it a terrorist organization and a threat to its national security, and it regularly sends forces across the Kurdistan Region’s borders to pursue the group. 

On Thursday, Turkish security forces said they captured a senior PKK member in the Kurdistan Region and brought him across the border to Turkey. The man, identified as Cimsit Demir, code-named Piro Karker, was caught by Turkish intelligence operatives as he was preparing an escape to Europe, Anadolu Agency reported

Turkish forces have advanced between 15 and 45 kilometres into the Kurdistan Region and have established more than 70 military and security posts along the border, Balambo Kokoy, a Kurdish lawmaker who was part of a parliamentary committee investigating the conflict, said earlier this month.

Scores of civilians have been killed and injured in decades of Turkish-PKK conflict in the Kurdistan Region.

The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) walks a fine line. It has called on Turkey to “respect” its sovereignty and on the PKK to leave the areas “in order not to cause chaos in the Kurdistan Region’s bordering areas.”

Recently, however, there have been several incidents between the PKK and forces aligned with the Kurdistan Democratic Forces (KDP), the ruling party in Duhok province. These clashes have sparked fears of an intra-Kurdish war. 

On Thursday, the PKK accused KDP forces of killing a number of their fighters. A group of guerrillas were moving between positions, but the PKK lost contact with them on July 26 in the Khalifan area. 

“According to the information we received from local people, the forces affiliated with the KDP surrounded the group and attacked it. Some of our friends fell [as] martyrs,” read a statement from the PKK’s armed wing, the HPG. 

The Ministry of Peshmerga on July 26 issued a statement saying PKK fighters opened fire on a Peshmerga base. “A number of PKK militants opened fire on a Peshmerga forces base, which lies between the Khalifan and Bekhma districts.” The statement added that they responded to the attack.

Tensions have been brewing between the KDP and the PKK for a year, both sides trying to assert control in areas of northern Duhok province where Turkey is carrying out its operations. 

The PKK have been blamed for two separate attacks on Peshmerga forces that resulted in the death of six Peshmerga, allegations the PKK have denied.