Areni Wine Festival inspires Armenian winemakers

Caucasian Knot, EU
Oct 4 2021

More than 200 winemakers took part in a wine festival held in the Armenian village of Areni. Participation in the event allows increasing brand awareness and make useful contacts for increasing sales, winemakers believe.

The Areni Wine Festival is held annually in the first week of October. According to Ani Mavyan, the project manager of the “Areni Festival” Fund, over 20 Armenian wine brands and about 200 homemade wines from Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh were presented at the festival.

The flow of visitors, as she said, “has increased surprisingly dramatically,” despite the pandemic. “Most of them are foreign tourists who came to Armenia specifically for the wine festival,” Ms Mavyan has added.

Apart from wines, the festival featured traditional meals, sweets, crops, works of artisans and painters and other goods. According to Ani Mavyan business problems of both industrial and home winemakers are being addressed at the event.

The major festival guests are tourists from abroad, who came especially to the event, Nune Manukyan, the director of the Association of Armenian Festivals, has confirmed.

According to her story, in 2020, the tourism sector was severely affected by the pandemic; and since there are no restrictions on holding mass events this year, there is a good opportunity to restore the sphere of the event tourism.

This article was originally published on the Russian page of 24/7 Internet agency ‘Caucasian Knot’ on October 3, 2021 at 02:28 pm MSK. To access the full text of the article, click here.

Author: Armine MartirosyanSource: CK correspondent

Source: 
© Caucasian Knot

Armenian Investigative Committee reports number of victims killed in battles for Nagorno-Karabakh

Caucasian Knot, EU
Oct 4 2021

During the combat actions in Nagorno-Karabakh, 3788 people were killed, and other 246 people, including 22 civilians, are listed as missing, the Investigative Committee of Armenia reports.

The “Caucasian Knot” has reported that the combat actions in Nagorno-Karabakh took place from September 27 to November 9, 2020.

“As of October 4, there are 224 soldiers and 22 civilians missing. Azerbaijan handed over 108 prisoners of war (POWs) to Armenia,” the press service for the Investigative Committee of Armenia reported.

Let us remind you that on August 11, Armenian human rights defender Artak Zeinalyan reported that Azerbaijan recognized the existence of only 45 Armenian prisoners of war, while Armenia submitted to the European Court of Human Rights the information about 280 Armenian POWs.

In December 2020, 64 soldiers of several Karabakh military posts, mainly residents of the Shirak Region of Armenia, were captured. Of them, 24 returned to their homeland, while others were prosecuted in Azerbaijan for espionage, terrorism, and illegal border crossing. In July, in Baku, a court sentenced 39 Armenian prisoners of war to six years of imprisonment.

This article was originally published on the Russian page of 24/7 Internet agency ‘Caucasian Knot’ on October 4, 2021 at 01:01 pm MSK. To access the full text of the article, click here.

Author: Tigran PetrosyanSource: CK correspondent

Source: 
© Caucasian Knot

Peacemakers accompany pilgrims to Nagorno-Karabakh monasteries

Caucasian Knot, EU
Oct 5 2021

Russian militaries have escorted a group of over 130 pilgrims to the Amaras and Ganzasar Monasteries located in the territories of Nagorno-Karabakh controlled by Azerbaijan, the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) has informed.

The “Caucasian Knot” has reported that Russian peacemakers are ensuring pilgrims’ safety when they visit monasteries located in the territories now under Azerbaijani control. Thus, on March 16, Russian militaries escorted pilgrims to the Dadivank Monastery; and on May 31, they ensured the safety of the believers who visited the Amaras Monastery.

Now, Russian militaries have escorted 134 Armenian pilgrims to the Amaras and Gandzasar Monasteries. In just a month, they accompanied about 700 pilgrims, says the website of the Russian MoD.

The Dadivank Monastery of the Armenian Apostolic Church is now in the territory of Karabakh, which has passed under Azerbaijan’s control. Believers expressed fears that they would no longer be able to visit the monastery. The abbot and the brethren decided not to leave Dadivank.

Amaras is an early medieval Armenian monastery of the 4th century. It contains the body of Grigoris, a grandson of Gregory the Illuminator, who died a martyr’s death around 334 in Albania, the “russia-artsakh.ru” informs.

This article was originally published on the Russian page of 24/7 Internet agency ‘Caucasian Knot’ on October 5, 2021 at 07:34 am MSK. To access the full text of the article, click here.

Source: CK correspondent

Source: 
© Caucasian Knot

Troops of Russian Southern Military District to conduct drills in Abkhazia, Armenia

TASS, Russia
Oct 5 2021
The exercise will be conducted as part of the final check for the 2021 academic year

ROSTOV-ON-DON, October 5. /TASS/. Units of Russia’s Southern Military District will conduct drills at training grounds in 14 Russian regions, as well as in Abkhazia, Armenia, and South Ossetia amid NATO’s naval exercises, the press service of the Southern Military District said on Tuesday.

The NATO drills involve warships, aviation, air and missile defense systems. Apart from that, the drills envisage the deployment of US troops to Black Sea countries, near the Russian borders.

“Battalion tactical groups of the Southern Military District army units have set off by railway, sea-going and motor transport to the designated areas of training grounds located in 14 Russian southern regions and in the military bases in the South Caucasian republics of Abkhazia, Armenia, and South Ossetia. This approach will ensure a comprehensive check of military units,” the press service said, adding that the drills will be conducted as part of the final check for the 2021 academic year.

Is Iran threatening Azerbaijan over Israel ties?

Jerusalem Post
Oct 5 2021



A service member of the Russian peacekeeping troops stands next to a tank near the border with Armenia, following the signing of a deal to end the military conflict between Azerbaijan and ethnic Armenian forces, in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh, November 10, 2020
(photo credit: REUTERS/FRANCESCO BREMBATI)

Iran’s media has begun to up the rhetoric against Azerbaijan, with a headline claiming that Baku has “denied the presence of the Zionist regime near the border with Iran,” a claim that appears to contrast with its insinuation that Israel’s close relationship with Azerbaijan is a threat to Tehran.
The larger context is that Iran has carried out military maneuvers near the border with Azerbaijan and Armenia and hosted an Armenian delegation, signaling its commitment to a robust policy that wants the status quo maintained on the border.What’s really going on here? A year ago, Azerbaijan launched a war against Armenian forces in the disputed area of Nagorno-Karabakh. In Baku’s view, backed by Turkey, the Armenians had for too long dominated disputed areas that they captured in the 1990s. In Armenian’s view, these were historical lands where Armenians lived and which the Soviet Union had arbitrarily made an autonomous part of the Azeri Soviet republic in the 20th century. 

Regardless of who is correct in this dispute, it shares similarities to many others such as in Northern Cyprus, the West Bank and other places. What matters is that a rising and increasingly powerful Azerbaijan is asserting itself militarily.
Israel and Iran’s northern neighbor enjoy close relations and Baku has acquired a large number of Israeli-made drones in recent decades, becoming a pioneering drone power. Azerbaijan frequently shows off Israeli-made drones and boasts of their effectiveness. Recent videos posted online even appeared to show IAI Harop drones in launch formation on the back of trucks being toured by Azeri leader Ilham Aliyev, according to videos on Twitter. 
Iran’s media claims the “Zionists” may be on Iran’s doorstep by working with Baku. But it also prints Azerbaijan’s denials. “Azerbaijan pursues an independent foreign policy and on this basis establishes relations with its neighbors and does not allow anyone to interfere in its internal affairs,” Aliyev said, according to Iran’s Fars News.  

WHAT IS the point of Iran’s major media, linked to the IRGC, printing denials without printing the accusation? The reason Iran does this is because the regime is careful not to up the rhetoric and stoke tensions with Azerbaijan.
But Tehran also wants to send a message to Baku that “we know what you are doing.” Iran has done this before, leaking information to pro-Iranian militias in Iraq so that those militias have blamed Azerbaijan for being the base for alleged drone attacks on pro-Iran militias in Iraq.  
Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, leader of Kataib Hezbollah in Iraq, a key part of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) claimed in 2019 that “we have accurate and confirmed information that this year, the Americans introduced four Israeli drones via Azerbaijan to operate within the US fleet to carry out flights and target Iraqi military bases.” 
The Guardian reported at the time in August that “the development comes as Shia militants in Iraq claimed that Israel has used drones launched from Azerbaijan to attack targets in the north and center of the country – areas which regional officials say have become transit hubs for weapons being sent to Iranian positions near Israel.”
The US soon afterwards killed Muhandis and IRGC Quds Force head Qasem Soleimani in a January 2020 drone strike, the drone in this case being flown from the Gulf. The point here is that Iran and its allies in Iraq were already accusing Baku of being a base for Israeli drones back in 2019. 
Now Iran is accusing Azerbaijan of similar activities. This comes in the context of regional Iranian attempts to harass and strike at Israel-linked targets, including attacks on shipping off the coast of Oman where Tehran used drones in July that killed two people on a ship, and an alleged plot recently in Cyprus.  

IRAN’S MEDIA printed on Tuesday a long list of comments from Azerbaijan. “We demand respect for our sovereign rights and non-interference in our internal affairs,” the president of the Republic of Azerbaijan stressed. “The charges against us must be formally substantiated. Let them come here and find a foreigner… They claim that Azerbaijan has opened the door to Israel in these areas… Where did they see Israel here?” 
This illustrates that Tehran is continuing to message about tensions with Baku. Iran wants Azerbaijan to stress the friendship between the two countries. Iran’s media prints claims that they share a historic friendship. “We do not accept allegations of the presence of third countries or any country near the Iran-Azerbaijan border, or the provocative actions of such forces, because such views have no basis,” a spokesman for Azerbaijan was quoted as saying. 
Meanwhile, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, during the presentation of the new ambassador of the Republic of Azerbaijan to Iran’s credentials, stated that “we do not tolerate the active presence of the Zionist regime in Azerbaijan against Iran’s security.” 
Iran has also carried out a military drill near the border. The Foreign Affairs minister had recently stated regarding the Iranian exercises on the border that “such exercises inside Iran are within the framework of Iran’s national sovereignty and clarified the Zionist regime’s movements along the joint borders of Iran and Azerbaijan,” according to Fars News. 
“The Islamic Republic of Iran does not tolerate the presence and activities of the Zionist regime against its national security and will take any necessary action in this regard,” Iran said. 
 
IRAN HOSTED Armenia’s foreign minister this week to hammer home its commitment to Armenia and to discuss the border tensions. While Yerevan stressed the need for open roads to its communities in Nagorno-Karabakh, Tehran discussed trade and other issues.
Trade and operation of the Armenian transit route is one of the important issues of the two countries, Iran said. “In defining the transit and truck routes of trade, we will not allow Iran’s relations with its neighbors to be affected by some foreign interference.”
The Iranian foreign minister then said he expressed concern over the presence of “the Zionists in the region…. Our region in the South Caucasus and our neighbor is still suffering from conditions, and the presence of the Zionists is a matter of serious concern to us.” He mentioned this several times, discussing foreign “actors” that were harming relations in the region.
Amir-Abdullahian emphasized that the region’s problems should be solved away from foreign interference, adding that, “considering the intense crises and also approaching the exit from the Corona crisis, we declare that our region will not tolerate new crises.”  
It is not clear if Iran will want to press this issue further or if it feels it has said enough. Its desire is to send a message to Azerbaijan and show its commitment to Armenia. However, the Islamic Republic does not want to increase tensions with Turkey, preferring that these issues on the border be compartmentalized. This is because Iran, Turkey and Russia share other common interests in removing the US from Syria and also discussions about Afghanistan and trade.
Iran does not actually want to be a party to a conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia: It wants to send messages and show where its redlines are.  

Egypt: Sisi Greets His Armenian Counterpart On Independence Day

All Africa
Oct 4 2021
4 OCTOBER 2021
Egypt State Information Service (Cairo)

President Abdel Fattah El Sisi on Monday sent a cable of greetings to his Armenian counterpart Armen Vardani Sarkissian on the occasion of his country’s Independence Day.

Presidential Secretary Hossam Zaatar was delegated to the Armenian Embassy in Cairo to convey Egypt’s greetings on this occasion.

Armenia’s top security official holds discussions with Iranian envoy

Iran Front Page
Oct 5 2021

Armenia’s National Security Council Secretary Armen Grigoryan has discussed bilateral ties and the latest regional developments with Iran’s Ambassador to Yerevan Abbas Badakhshan Zohuri.

The two sides reviewed security issues and stability in the region.

Grigoryan and Badakhshan Zohuri also exchanged views on the prospect of cooperation to solve new challenges in the region and economic relations between Armenia and Iran, especially the development of Armenian Province of Syunik, and stressed the importance of the Iranian port of Chabahar.

The Iranian ambassador stressed that Tehran is trying to strengthen its relations with Armenia at the highest level.

On Monday, Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan sat down for talks with his Iranian counterpart Hossein Amirabdollahian in Tehran.

Amirabdollahian told the Armenian foreign minister that Tehran will not allow terrorist forces and the Zionist regime to harm Iran’s good relations with its neighbors.

Mirzoyan said during the meeting that rapid international and regional developments have led senior officials of the two countries to meet frequently.

Meanwhile Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said on Monday that the Islamic Republic is Armenia’s partner, and that Yerevan has never been and will never be involved in any plot against Iran.

PRESS RELEASE – AUA Receives $813,135 USAID/ASHA Grant for its Media Lab Project

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


PRESS RELEASE

AUA Receives $813,135 USAID/ASHA Grant for its Media Lab Project

YEREVAN, Armenia — The American University of Armenia (AUA) is happy to receive the approval notification of a competitive grant award of $813,135 from the American Schools and Hospitals Abroad (ASHA) program of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The grant is for the establishment of the AUA Media Lab, which aims to strengthen democratic culture, promote the development of a civic press, foster citizen engagement in social media, and advocate for the proper discernment of information.

Through cutting-edge equipment and tools, the AUA Media Lab will serve as a medium for pinpointing target areas of media intervention most crucial for the industry. The initiative will promote the co-creation of well-grounded and reliable approaches to curtail pervasive misinformation and disinformation that corrupt the media landscape and falsely amplify narratives that undermine the legitimacy of democracy. With a focus on strengthening American values and practices and catalyzing collaboration with civil society, the Media Lab will serve as a platform for fostering public trust, tolerance, and empathy between and among various communities. This is expected to improve the media landscape and the level of civic engagement, as well as nurture civic skills that advance an effective and results-driven reform agenda.

As a 21st century American educational institution, part of AUA’s role is to inform, educate and enlighten large numbers of learners within the AUA community, as well as in the extended urban and rural populations. By serving as a community media hub, the AUA Media Lab is expected to generate a competitive advantage for AUA in identifying the most optimal strategic directions for civil society capacity building. This will expand learning opportunities and advance leadership competencies among students, particularly those majoring in humanities and social sciences or business by fostering dialogue and seminal discourse and communication initiatives.

The AUA Media Lab will not only promote civic engagement among all members of the AUA community, other users, guests, invited speakers, and participants of public events, but also expand institutional linkages and collaborations with other local and international universities and research centers. The larger community will have the opportunity to take part in targeted professional and specialized training in high-impact media concepts and related topics. Moreover, AUA will be able to build expert capacity and attract new collaborative initiatives and research through the Media Lab.

Founded in 1991, the American University of Armenia (AUA) is a private, independent university located in Yerevan, Armenia, affiliated with the University of California, and accredited by the WASC Senior College and University Commission in the United States. AUA provides local and international students with Western-style education through top-quality undergraduate, graduate, and certificate programs, promotes research and innovation, encourages civic engagement and community service, and fosters democratic values. 


Kind regards,
Margarit

Margarit Hovhannisyan | Communications Manager

Margarit Hovhannisyan|: Communication manager

+374 60 612 514,  

mhovhannisyan@  

__________________________________________

American University of Armenia

Republic of Armenia, 0019, Yerevan, Marshal Baghramyan Ave. 40:00

40 Baghramyan Avenue, Yerevan 0019, Republic of Armenia


Media Lab.jpg

JPEG image

Turkish press: Azerbaijani, Armenian leaders ready for summit to discuss Karabakh

Soldiers carry portraits of Azerbaijani service members killed in the recent conflict over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh during a commemoration on its first anniversary, in Baku, Azerbaijan, Sept. 27, 2021. (Reuters Photo)

Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian both expressed readiness for a joint summit as the second Karabakh war between the two countries is left a year behind.

Pashinian commented on the relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan during a meeting with the Armenian community in Lithuania.

Noting that Armenia is ready to hold high-level talks with Azerbaijan, Pashinian said: “On July 1, I announced that we were ready for a high-level summit. This meeting can be at the level of foreign ministers or prime minister-president. I believe that there are no restrictions on the place and time of a meeting with the president of Azerbaijan.”

Arguing that the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group is experienced in organizing such summits, Pashinian said: “We are happy to state that the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group have started to intensify their activities. We are ready to start the process of delineating the borders.”

Aliyev also said in a statement on Oct. 2: “I am ready and I have already stated my position. If the Armenian side is ready, I am also ready. Earlier this year, upon the invitation of Russian President Vladimir Putin, we had a tripartite meeting. I can talk to Pashinian at any time when he is ready. I am open to negotiations and I think this could be a good sign that the war is over and that page has been turned. This is very important.”

Relations between the former Soviet republics have been tense since 1991 when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions.

The Minsk Group, co-chaired by France, Russia and the United States, was formed in 1992 to find a peaceful solution to the conflict, but to no avail. A cease-fire, however, was agreed upon in 1994.

When new clashes erupted on Sept. 27, the Armenian army launched attacks on civilians and Azerbaijani forces and violated several humanitarian cease-fire agreements. During the 44-day conflict, Azerbaijan liberated several cities and nearly 300 settlements and villages from Armenian occupation.

The two countries signed a Russian-brokered agreement on Nov. 10 to end fighting and work toward a comprehensive resolution. The truce is seen as a victory for Azerbaijan and a defeat for Armenia, whose armed forces have been withdrawing in line with the agreement.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov also said in a statement regarding Pashinian’s plan to meet with Putin in Russia, “Pashinian is expected to visit Russia. A private meeting with Putin is being prepared.”

Regarding the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said after his meeting with Putin in Sochi that Russia was ready to create a six-nation platform.

Erdoğan has frequently called for a six-nation platform comprising Turkey, Russia, Iran, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia for permanent peace, stability and cooperation in the region, saying it would be a win-win initiative for all regional actors in the Caucasus.

Turkey believes that permanent peace is possible through mutual security-based cooperation among the states and people of the South Caucasus region.

He noted that the Zangezur corridor would provide opportunities for the region as a whole, in terms of trade and economy.

“Azerbaijan is carrying out widescale work for this corridor,” Erdoğan said, adding that Armenia also needs to fulfill its responsibilities.

Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu also said last week that Turkey would coordinate all steps to be taken in terms of reestablishing relations with Armenia amid positive statements in that regard, but no meeting has been scheduled with his Armenian counterpart.

Pashinian’s spokesperson Mane Gevorgyan last month said her country is ready to engage in high-level dialogue with Turkey. She noted that Yerevan was ready to establish the highest-level dialogue with Ankara and eliminate obstacles on the transit corridor that would have to go through Armenia to connect Azerbaijan to its Nakhchivan enclave that borders Turkey and Iran.

Armenia and Turkey never established diplomatic relations and their shared border has been closed since the 1990s. The ties have further deteriorated due to Turkey’s support for its regional ally Azerbaijan, which fought with Armenia last year for the liberation of the occupied Nagorno-Karabakh region.

Ankara has pledged its full support to Baku in its efforts to liberate its lands from Armenian occupation. A joint Turkish-Russian center was established to monitor the truce. Russian peacekeeping troops have also been deployed to the region.

Meanwhile, Aliyev Monday visited the city of Jabrayil and some surrounding villages and towns in the first year of its liberation from occupation.

Speaking in the town of Sukovushan, Aliyev emphasized that this place is of great strategic importance and that the liberation of Sukovushan provided great morale for the army.

“During the occupation, the Armenians cut off the water of the Sukovushan dam in summer and opened it in winter. While our villagers and farmers were dehydrated during the summer months, the water released during the winter months would cause flooding. This shows once again what an ugly foe we are dealing with. They used every opportunity to do us more harm,” he said.

Aliyev, who also criticized former Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan in his speech, said: “The analysis of the war shows once again that the losers of this war are Serzh Sargsyan and others like him. Now they want to blame Nikol Pashinian for the defeat. It is supposed that Pashinian is guilty. Pashinian came to power in 2018. Serzh Sargsyan founded the army. He served as a defense minister, prime minister, secretary of the president, head of the security service, and became president for 10 years. We destroyed that army and destroyed Serzh Sargsyan and elements like him. Let this defeat not be blamed on Pashinian. What Pashinian did is a separate issue. But we defeated Sargsyan. The army he formed knelt before us.”

Turkish press: Turkey won’t be intimidated by US threats of sanctions: Bahçeli

Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) Chairperson Devlet Bahçeli gestures during his party’s parliamentary group meeting in Ankara, Turkey, Oct. 5, 2021. (IHA Photo)

Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) Chairperson Devlet Bahçeli criticized the United States for threatening to impose more sanctions on Turkey if it proceeds with the purchase of additional S-400 missile defense systems from Russia, and said their threats are in vain.

Speaking at his party’s first parliamentary meeting of the new legislative session, Bahçeli said Turkey will not give up its sovereign character after the U.S.’ “sanctions card.”

“So the U.S. administration threatens us with new sanctions. Let them do that, we’ve gotten used to it by now,” Bahçeli said, as he criticized Washington for threatening Turkey but providing weapons to terrorists in northern Syria.

The U.S. has called on Turkey to refrain from buying additional Russian arms after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said they still intended to acquire a new batch of Russian-made missile systems, despite Washington’s opposition.

Turkey’s initial purchase of the first batch of S-400s from Russia strained ties with the U.S.

The move prompted Washington to remove Turkey from the new generation F-35 Lightning II jet program before it imposed sanctions on the country’s Defense Industry Presidency (SSB), its chief, Ismail Demir, and three other employees in December

The U.S. argued that the system could be used by Russia to covertly obtain classified details on the Lockheed Martin F-35 jets and that it is incompatible with NATO systems. Turkey, however, insists that the S-400 would not be integrated into NATO systems and would not pose a threat to the alliance.

Erdoğan explained that Turkey was not given the option to buy American-made Patriot missiles and that the U.S. had not delivered F-35 stealth fighter jets despite payment of $1.4 billion (TL 12.37 billion).

The MHP chair also slammed the U.S. for plans to label the Idealist Hearths as a terrorist group.

“Only martyrs and heroes come from Idealist Hearths, not terrorists or traitors,” Bahçeli said.

The 2022 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) adopted by the U.S. House of Representatives seeks to designate the Idealist Hearths, as a foreign terrorist group. The Gülenist Terror Group (FETÖ) and the Armenian lobby in the U.S. are thought to be behind the act.

Meanwhile, Bahçeli also criticized opposition parties for seeing Kurdish people as a “problem.”

“Turkey does not have a Kurdish issue,” he said, adding that the Republican People’s Party (CHP) and the Good Party (IP) see Kurds as a problem. He noted that there is a terrorism problem in the country instead. He also dismissed the opposition’s demand to hold early elections once again and said there was no return to the parliamentary system.

“The presidential system needs to be enhanced and maintained,” he said, in response to the opposition’s plans to return to the parliamentary system.

The CHP and IP argue that Turkey should return to the parliamentary system and the CHP has been working on a “strengthened parliamentary system” proposal.

The opposition-led Nation Alliance’s other main partner, IP, also revealed its legislative reform proposal, called the “Improved and Strengthened Parliamentary System,” last month.

The system includes eight main features: An “impartial president,” a “pluralist democracy, participative government, strong Parliament,” “separation of powers and strong supervision,” “rule of law and independent impartial judiciary,” “merit in the state,” “human rights and individual freedoms, strong social state, strong civil society, strong youth,” “free press and media” and “fair and free elections.”

In response, the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) earlier this month dismissed the possibility of early elections and the opposition’s demand to return to a parliamentary system.

It has been more than four years since Turkey switched from a parliamentary system to the current presidential system after the majority of Turkish voters opted to create the new system. Turkish voters narrowly endorsed an executive presidency in the April 16, 2017 referendum with 51.4% of the votes in favor. The official transition to the new system took place when President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan took the presidential oath of office in Parliament after the June 24, 2018, general elections, during which he won 52.6% of the votes.

The next presidential and general elections are planned to be held in 2023.