Skip to main content

Russian-Iranian competition heats up in South Caucasus

Oct 15 2021
For Moscow, contradictions with Tehran may turn out to be much more sensitive than disputes with Ankara.


Kirill Semenov

During Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian’s visit to Moscow on Oct. 5, one of the main topics of the talks with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov was rising tensions in Iranian-Azerbaijani ties. At a press conference in the Russian capital, Iran’s top diplomat voiced a range of complaints against Baku, focusing on Azerbaijan’s dealings with Israel. In turn, Lavrov made it clear that Russia is “against the buildup of military activity” in the South Caucasus and “against provocative exercises,” which should have been a signal to the Iranian side about the need to reduce the tension. 

Azerbaijan and Turkey carried out joint military exercises in early September in the Azerbaijani Lachin region, as tensions between Baku and Tehran escalate.

Moreover, the Russian foreign minister mentioned that at the talks with Abdollahian he spoke in favor of creating a “3 + 3” negotiation format, which would include Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Iran, Russia and Turkey. This is necessary to resolve regional issues, he stressed.

On Oct. 1, Iranian ground forces began the “Conquerors of Khaybar” exercises in the northwest of the country, on the border with Azerbaijan, using armored units, artillery, drones and combat helicopters. This is one of the largest military maneuvers the Iranian armed forces have conducted in recent history near Azerbaijan, inevitably sparking fears that it could be preparation for military aggression.

Iran also accused Azerbaijan of cooperation with Israel. The head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps in Tabriz, Col. Hossein Pursmail, said that “the repetition of Israel’s threats against Iran through the mouth of Azerbaijan is not only not in the interest of Baku, it is also a threat to the latter’s very existence.” Further statements by Iranian representatives expanded the list of Tehran’s grievances. For example, Iranian lawmaker Mahmoud Begash pointed out that it could not only be about Israel: “If the Turkish adventure and Azerbaijan’s behavior continue, we will return Nakhchivan and Nagorno-Karabakh to the main owner — Iran.” Both Nakhchivan and Nagorno-Karabakh are autonomous regions within Azerbaijan

Tehran’s militaristic moves near the border with Azerbaijan, as well as the crisis between the two countries in general, are provoked primarily by the ambitions of the new Iranian leadership under President Ebrahim Raisi, which is likely seeking to compensate for the failures of its predecessors through taking tough stances. 

The foreign policy of Raisi’s administration “is a balanced foreign policy under active, dynamic and intelligent diplomacy. Our focus on Asia and the region doesn’t mean that we don’t pay attention to other regions including the West,” Amir-Abdollahian told Iranian news agency ISNA.

During the 44-day Armenian-Azerbaijani war in late 2020, the previous Iranian administration, led by Reformists, tried to come up with various mediation initiatives. However, the Iranian proposals did not arouse interest from the parties to the conflict themselves, nor from Russia and Turkey.

Tehran likely harbored a grudge, and Lavrov had to specifically comment on the issue in December 2020, a month after the conflict had ended, saying, “By the way, I don’t remember that during all the years of my tenure as Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia, in the course of our numerous contacts with Iranian colleagues, the topic of Karabakh aroused interest during our consultations or negotiations.” 

Thus, Iran, unlike Russia and Turkey, felt as though its interests were not observed following the Armenian-Azerbaijani war.

In addition, Iran — which views itself as a leader globally for Shiite Muslims — has practically lost its influence in the predominantly Shiite country of Azerbaijan, and is trying to compensate with direct support from Armenia. But by doing so, Tehran is challenging not only Baku and its allied Ankara, but also Moscow. Tehran is trying to become a guarantor of the security and territorial integrity of Armenia and thereby reduce the Russian side’s influence on the Armenian leadership. This was duly appreciated in Armenia itself, and Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan unexpectedly went to Tehran on Monday, Oct. 4, where he received corresponding assurances of support from the Iranian side.

“Azerbaijan’s encroachments on the sovereign territory of Armenia threaten our efforts to ensure stability and security in the region,” Mirzoyan said during the visit. “In this regard, we highly appreciate the position of Iran regarding the territorial integrity of Armenia and the inviolability of its borders.”

By “encroachments on the territory” he meant the Zangezur Corridor, a route that must pass, according to the agreements on Nov. 10, 2020, through Armenia and connect the main territory of Azerbaijan with the isolated Azerbaijani region of Nakhchivan. Keep in mind that this approach by Iran, which opposes the creation of this corridor, also indirectly contradicts the interests of Russia, since the Russian border troops will have to ensure the protection of this highway, which would certainly provide Moscow with additional leverage in the South Caucasus.

The contours of the Russian-Iranian contradictions in the South Caucasus complement the Russian-Iranian competition in Syria. The gradual accumulation of the conflict potential of the two countries, unlike the mutual claims of Ankara and Moscow, is still hidden and not advertised, and in Russia it is often denied.

In Syria, Russia can hardly be satisfied with the constant attempts of pro-Iranian structures, primarily the 4th division of Maher Assad, to take control of the territories on the borders with Jordan and Israel. If these areas are transferred to the 4th division, pro-Iranian formations might be deployed there, which will threaten Israel, Russia’s strategic partner in the Middle East. Also, the the creation of a virtually autonomous pro-Iranian enclave in the Deir az-Zor region certainly worries Russia, along with Tehran’s influence on decision-making in Damascus in general, which is still decisive. Iran has also occupied most of the most attractive niches in the Syrian economy, which are closed to Russian business.

On the whole, for Moscow, contradictions with Tehran may turn out to be much more sensitive than disputes with Ankara. Russia and Turkey are filling vacuums in the Middle East and South Caucasus, not encroaching on each other’s spheres of influence, but only dividing them (as happened in Idlib or in Libya). Iran, on the other hand, may try to start pushing Russia out of the place where it is already entrenched, be it part of Syria controlled by Assad or Armenia. Also, Iran may compete with Russia for influence in Afghanistan, as well as in Central Asia, notably Tajikistan.

Turkey: Soldiers Beat, Push Afghan Asylum Seekers Back to Iran

Human Rights Watch
Oct. 15, 2021
[Authorities Deny Afghans Right to Seek Asylum]
(New York) – Turkish authorities are summarily pushing Afghan asylum
seekers crossing into the country from Iran back to Iran, in violation
of international law, Human Rights Watch said today.
Six Afghans, five of whom were pushed back, told Human Rights Watch
that the Turkish army beat them and their fellow travelers – some to
the point of breaking their bones – and collectively expelled them in
groups of 50 to 300 people as they tried to cross the border to seek
safety in Turkey. Some families were separated in the process.
“Turkish authorities are denying Afghans trying to flee to safety the
right to seek asylum,” said Belkis Wille, senior crisis and conflict
researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Turkish soldiers are also brutally
mistreating the Afghans while unlawfully pushing them back.”
Chancellor Angela Merkel is scheduled to visit Turkey on October 16,
2021 to meet with President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Merkel should push
the Turkish government to end its summary expulsions of Afghans;
investigate allegations of collective expulsions, rejections at the
border, and the denial of the right to seek asylum; and remedy such
instances.
From September 25 to October 11, Human Rights Watch remotely
interviewed six Afghans, five of them in hiding in Turkey to avoid
being expelled to Iran, and one who had been forcibly returned to Iran
for a third time. All had fled Afghanistan shortly before or after
August 15, when the Taliban took control of Kabul.
They said they had traveled through Pakistan and Iran, and that
Iranian smugglers took them to the mountainous border with Turkey in
the middle of the night and told them to run across. Turkish soldiers
started firing above their heads. and two said that the soldiers
brutally beat them.
While one of the Afghans successfully remained in Turkey on his first
try and one had been deported back to Iran, the four others said
Turkish soldiers forced them back up to three times before they
succeeded in remaining in Turkey.
Two said that Turkish forces destroyed their possessions, and those of
everyone in the group they were expelled with. “Once they arrested us,
they confiscated our phones, money, food, and anything else we were
carrying and burned all of our things in a big fire,” one woman said.
“I assume they did this to send the message that we should not try to
cross the border again.”
One man said they stripped the men in his group down to their boxer
shorts and burned the clothes and all their belongings, then forcibly
returned them.
One man said that soldiers beat them with the butts of their guns and
that several men in his group had broken hands, arms, and legs from
the beatings. “It took 10 days for the pain to go away, but for my
friend it was worse,” he said. “He had to get our smuggler to take him
to a doctor in Iran who treated him for a broken arm and leg.”
Another man said: “The second time I crossed into Turkey I saw the
Turkish soldiers beating people crossing with me to the point that
they were covered in blood and had big wounds to their heads. They
beat me for about 20 minutes with the butts of their guns and sticks,
leaving me bleeding.”
Three Afghans said that while they were not seriously beaten
themselves, they saw soldiers brutally beating, including with heavy
hoses, others running with them. “There was one very tall soldier,
with his face concealed,” a woman said. “He was like a madman, wildly
beating my brother with a stick and yelling, ‘Why did you come here?’”
One woman said that on her third attempt to cross into Turkey with her
two children, her brother, his wife, and their child, Turkish soldiers
detained her brother and his wife and expelled them, leaving their
child with her.
One man said that a man in his group was forced back with him to Iran,
while his wife and children were taken to a detention center in
Turkey. He said that police arrested him in  a town 180 kilometers
west of the border and brought him to what looked like a refugee camp
that was being used as a detention center, where his group joined
about 135 people.
He and another man said that after they were sent back to Iran with
their group, thieves abducted the group and demanded ransoms to
release them. “The thieves came in cars and on motorbikes, wielding
knives and sticks,” he said. “They demanded that we get our families
to send US$100 per person. We got our smuggler, who we could reach on
the phone, to send them the money, and then of course we owed that
money to the smuggler afterward.”
The other man said the thieves held them for two days, took all their
belongings including cash, beside their phones, and forced them to
call their relatives to send money through brokers in Iran.
Turkey hosts the world’s largest number of refugees, 3.7 million from
Syria granted temporary protection status, and over 400,000 refugees
and migrants from Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries. Human Rights
Watch has previously documented illegal pushbacks and beatings of
asylum seekers, including to Syria, and the media has reported on the
violent pushbacks of Afghans to Iran.
While most people interviewed said they were forcibly returned close
to the border, one said that he and eight of his relatives were
deported after they went to a local immigration office in Turkey. He
said they went to the office because they were ill and needed to be
allowed to go to a hospital.
“When we got there, the authorities arrested us and took our phones
and turned them off, so the rest of our family had no idea what
happened to us,” he said. “They held us for two nights and one day,
and only fed us twice … after the second night they put us onto buses
with about 100 other people and drove us to the border. One soldier at
the border told us, ‘Here is the border. Don’t come back. If you do,
we will beat you.’”
All governments receiving Afghan asylum seekers and other migrants,
including Turkey, should fully respect international refugee and human
rights law, as enshrined in the 1951 Refugee Convention, human rights
treaties, and customary international law. Notably, the obligation of
nonrefoulement prohibits returning anyone to a place where they would
face a real risk of persecution or threats to their lives or freedom,
torture, or other serious harm. Iran continues to deport Afghans to
Afghanistan. For example, Iran deported 28,735 Afghans back to
Afghanistan in the span of three days in early September.
The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), governments, and other actors should
monitor, document, and challenge pushbacks at Turkey’s borders.
Governments with embassies in Turkey should support Turkey to register
and protect Afghan asylum seekers and press Turkey to allow all
agencies working for refugees to freely assist and help protect all
Afghans, including those who are unregistered.
The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the European
Commission, and European states should publicly press Turkey to
refrain from summarily expelling Afghan refugees to Iran, where they
are at risk of chain deportation to Afghanistan and other serious
harms. The Commission should closely monitor developments and take
into consideration collective expulsions and deportations of Afghan
asylum seekers in its cooperation with Turkey on migration control and
for its reports on Turkey’s accession process and on the European
Agenda on Migration.
“EU member states should not consider Turkey a safe third country for
Afghan asylum seekers and should suspend all deportations and forced
returns of Afghan nationals, including to third countries like Turkey
where their rights would not be respected,” Wille said. “They should
also ensure that Afghans entering the EU via Turkey have access to
fair and efficient asylum procedures.”
 

Greece, US Expand Defense Pact in Face of Turkey Tensions

Military News
15 Oct 2021
Associated Press | By Ellen Knickmeyer
WASHINGTON — The United States and Greece signed a deal Thursday
expanding their defense cooperation agreement to grant U.S. forces
broader use of Greek bases, as that nation deals with tensions between
it and neighboring Turkey.
The deal, signed in Washington by Secretary of State Antony Blinken
and Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias, will allow U.S. forces to
train and operate "in an expanded capacity" at four additional bases
in Greece, Dendias said.
“This is not an agreement…against anybody else,” Dendias said in an
interview with The Associated Press after the signing ceremony,
although he noted the new agreement put a U.S. military presence just
miles (kilometers) from Turkey. ”It’s an agreement between Greece and
the United States of America, and the purpose of the agreement is the
stability and prosperity of both our countries.”
Greece is pinning much of its defense strategy on close military
cooperation with France and the United States as it remains locked in
a volatile dispute with Turkey over sea and airspace boundaries. Greek
officials also have been actively pursuing other international
agreements, with partners in the Middle East, Europe and elsewhere.
Blinken at Thursday’s signing ceremony called the U.S. and Greece “two
proud, strong NATO allies, both deeply committed to our alliance.”
Thursday’s agreement, building on an existing one, will run for five
years with automatic renewal, Greek officials said.
NATO – the North Atlantic defense bloc to which the U.S., Turkey,
France and Greece all belong – is built on the idea of collective
defense, so that an attack on one member nation is considered an
attack at all.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg earlier this month appeared to
criticize Greece’s newly ratified mutual defense agreement with
France, without naming the two countries. “What I don’t believe in is
efforts to try to do something outside the NATO framework, or compete
with or duplicate NATO,” Stoltenberg said then.
Dendias, speaking at the residence attached to the Greek Embassy in
Washington, said Greece's mutual defense deal with France “is an
agreement that is complementary to NATO."
“It does not diminish the role of NATO,” he added.
NATO members Greece and Turkey are at odds over sea boundaries and
mineral rights in the eastern Mediterranean, spurring Athens to launch
a major spending program to modernize its armed forces.
Turkey in turn accuses Greece of overstating its own territorial
claims to the Aegean and other waters.
Thursday's US-Greece agreement builds on one signed in Athens two
years ago by Blinken’s predecessor, Mike Pompeo, and will give the
United States increased access to two bases in central Greece and one
at Alexandroupolis, near the Greek-Turkish border. The U.S. naval base
at Souda Bay, in the Greek island of Crete is also key to the defense
relationship.
The Greek push to build alliances comes as the United States tries to
turn more of its international focus to competition with China,
reducing its military strength in some other parts of the world.
The Greek government understands the United States' need to pay more
attention to China and the Indo-Pacific overall — but argues that
Greece's neighborhood is one American forces shouldn't leave, Dendias
said.
“If the American presence is not manifested, some countries may have
clever ideas about their role,” envisioning themselves as “local
superpowers,” he said. “I am sometimes afraid that Turkey may be
falling under that category.”
 

Azerbaijani press: MoD reports firefight inside illegal Armenian armed groups in Karabakh

By Vugar Khalilov

A firefight has taken place between members of illegal Armenian armed groups on Azerbaijan’s territory, where Russian peacekeepers are temporarily deployed, the Defence Ministry reported on October 14.

“First, several drunken gunmen from the opposing side clashed with each other. Then an explosion was observed in the area. According to initial reports, there are killed and wounded as a result of the shooting,” the report added.

The ministry stressed that the Azerbaijani army has no relation to the incident.

Lately, several provocations have been observed by the Armenian detachments illegally located in Karabakh under the Russian peacekeepers’ temporary control.

Azerbaijani army soldier Afgan Hamzayev was martyred as a result of sniper fire opened by illegal Armenian armed groups at about 1815 on October 14, the Defence Ministry earlier reported.

On October 14, Azerbaijan downed an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) of illegal Armenian armed detachments on its territory under the Russian peacekeepers’ control. The UAV tried to carry out reconnaissance flights over the positions of the Azerbaijan army in the direction of liberated Fuzuli region.

At about 1400 on October 13, an Azerbaijani civilian convoy moving from Tartar region’s Sugovushan settlement to Kalbajar to build civil infrastructure there was fired on by illegal Armenian armed groups located in the area controlled by the Russian peacekeepers.

As a result of the incident, the front, rear, wheel and movement mechanisms of the car, which belonged to the Azerbaijani army’s military police moving in front of the convoy were damaged. No casualties were reported among the Azerbaijani personnel.

The Defence Ministry described as unacceptable the fact that a civilian convoy, which carried materials for the reconstruction in the liberated lands and escorted by Russian peacekeepers, was fired on by illegal Armenian armed groups.

The ministry appealed to the Russian peacekeeping command temporarily stationed in a certain part of Azerbaijan’s Karabakh Economic Region and the Russian-Turkish Joint Monitoring Center to investigate the incident.

About 2,000 Russian peacekeepers have been deployed for five years in Karabakh under the trilateral cease-fire deal signed by Baku, Moscow and Yerevan on 10 November 2020. The signed agreement obliged Armenia to withdraw all its troops from the Azerbaijani lands that it had occupied since the early 1990s.

The deal also stipulated the return of Azerbaijan’s Kalbajar, Aghdam and Lachin regions. Before the signing of the peace deal, Azerbaijan liberated 300 villages, settlements, city centers, and historic Shusha city that had been under Armenian occupation for about 30 years.

On August 11, 2021, Azerbaijan urged the Russian peacekeepers to end the illegal deployment of Armenian troops on Azerbaijan’s territories under their temporary control.

Later on August 14, President Ilham Aliyev reiterated that Azerbaijan had identified that Armenian troops were being sent to Karabakh via the Lachin corridor that is controlled by the Russian peacekeepers and stressed that this contradicted the 10 November deal.

Turkish press: Armenia eyes normalization with Turkey, says prime minister

Elena Teslova   |15.10.2021


MOSCOW

Armenia’s prime minister on Friday said normalizing ties with Turkey would help establish lasting peace in the region and implement the agreements reached last year on the Upper Karabakh region.

Speaking at a meeting of Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) country leaders, Pashinyan stressed that normalization between Yerevan and Ankara could accelerate settlement between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

“Starting a conversation with the aim of normalizing our relations with Turkey is another factor that could play the role of a catalyst in this issue,” he said, referring to the implementation of agreements on Upper Karabakh, also known as Nagorno-Karabakh.

He also stressed the importance of restoring transportation channels as a major milestones towards normalization with Azerbaijan and the implementation of the agreements on Karabakh.

“We hope to achieve concrete results in the near future. This means that Armenia will receive railway and automobile communication with Russia and Iran through the territory of Azerbaijan, and Azerbaijan will receive railway and automobile communication with the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic through the territory of Armenia,” he said.

All these steps would serve to lay the groundwork of signing a peace treaty between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Pashinyan noted.

“Of course, the main issue is the signing of a peace treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan. To this end, we consider it important to restore the negotiation process within the framework of the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) Minsk Group co-chairmanship. In recent months, the co-chairs have repeatedly noted in their statements the need to resume the peace process for the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,” he said.

Liberation of Karabakh

Relations between the former Soviet republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan have been tense since 1991, when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territory, and seven adjacent regions.

When new clashes erupted on Sept. 27, 2020, the Armenian army launched attacks on civilians and Azerbaijani forces and violated several humanitarian cease-fire agreements.

During the 44-day conflict, Azerbaijan liberated several cities and nearly 300 settlements and villages from the nearly three-decade occupation.

Despite a Nov. 10 deal last year ending the conflict, the Armenian army several times violated the agreement and martyred several Azerbaijani soldiers and a civilian, and wounded several others, according to the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry.

Turkish press: Turkey’s heritages enjoy UNESCO stamp

Handan Kazancı   |15.10.2021


ISTANBUL

With the addition of the Arslantepe Mound earlier this year, Turkey currently boasts 19 sites on the UNESCO World Heritage List, including 17 cultural and two mixed.

As of 2021, UNESCO lists 1,154 cultural and natural sites worldwide on its World Heritage List.

Selimiye Mosque and social complex in Edirne

Added to the UNESCO list in 2011, the Selimiye Mosque and its social complex in Turkey’s northwestern province of Edirne was constructed by Sinan, the most renowned Ottoman architect in the 16th century.

Its complex includes madrasas (Islamic schools), a covered market, a clock house, an outer courtyard, and a library.

“The square Mosque with its single great dome and four slender minarets, dominates the skyline of the former Ottoman capital of Edirne,” according to UNESCO’s website.

Adorned by tiles from the town of Iznik renowned for its ceramics at “the peak period of their production,” the organization says the mosque “testifies to an art form that remains unsurpassed in this material.”

Pergamon and multi-layered cultural landscape

Located in Turkey’s Aegean province of Izmir, Pergamon and its surrounding multi-layered cultural landscape was added to the list in 2014.

As the capital of the Hellenistic Attalid dynasty, the acropolis of Pergamon was a major center of learning in the ancient world, says UNESCO.

“Monumental temples, theatres, stoa or porticoes, gymnasium, altar, and library were set into the sloping terrain surrounded by an extensive city wall,” it adds.

It is possible to see the remains of the Roman, Byzantine, and Ottoman empires in and around the modern town of Bergama.

Ephesus

Also in Izmir province, the world-renowned ancient city of Ephesus was added to the UNESCO list in 2015.

The UN body celebrates “grand monuments of the Roman Imperial period” including the Library of Celsus and the Great Theater, which have been unearthed in excavations.

“Little remains of the famous Temple of Artemis, one of the ‘Seven Wonders of the World,’ which drew pilgrims from all around the Mediterranean.” The House of the Virgin Mary, a chapel close to Ephesus has also become a place of Christian pilgrimage, it says.

Historic areas of Istanbul

Turkey’s largest city Istanbul has been associated with major political, religious, and artistic events for more than 2,000 years, the UN has said.

“Its masterpieces include the ancient Hippodrome of Constantine, the 6th-century Hagia Sophia and the 16th-century Suleymaniye Mosque.”

However, it has warned that all these sites are now “under threat from population pressure, industrial pollution, and uncontrolled urbanization.”

Istanbul was added to the list in 1985.

Bursa and Cumalikizik

In northwestern Turkey, the city of Bursa and nearby village of Cumalikizik were added to the UNESCO list in 2014 as a serial nomination of eight component sites.

“The site illustrates the creation of an urban and rural system establishing the Ottoman Empire in the early 14th century,” it says, adding that the area “embodies the key functions of the social and economic organization” of the Ottomans’ first capital, which “evolved around a civic centre.”

The village of Cumalikizik is the only rural area “to show the provision of hinterland support for the capital.”

City of Safranbolu

Added to the UNESCO list in 1994, the City of Safranbolu, a typical Ottoman town, is located in northern Turkey.

From the 13th century to the advent of the railway in the early 20th century, Safranbolu was “an important caravan station on the main East-West trade route,” UNESCO says.

It features an Old Mosque, Old Bath and the Suleyman Pasha Medrese, which were built in 1322. “During its apogee in the 17th century, Safranbolu’s architecture influenced urban development throughout much of the Ottoman Empire.”

Hattusha

Hattusha, the capital of the Hittites — one of the most ancient Anatolian civilizations — was added to the UNESCO list in 1986.

The city’s remains, located in present-day central Turkey, is “notable for its urban organization, the types of construction that have been preserved,” including temples, royal residences, fortifications.

UNESCO also notes the rich ornamentation of the Lions’ Gate and the Royal Gate into the city’s interior, as well as the “ensemble of rock art at Yazilikaya.”

“The city enjoyed considerable influence in Anatolia and northern Syria in the 2nd millennium BC,” it adds.

Great mosque and hospital of Divrigi

The distinguished 11th-century Great Mosque and Hospital of Divrigi are located in central Turkey. It was added to the UNESCO list in 1985.

With its single prayer room and two cupolas, the mosque exhibits a “highly sophisticated technique of vault construction, and a creative, exuberant type of decorative sculpture — particularly on the three doorways, in contrast to the unadorned walls of the interior,” it describes the “unique features of this masterpiece of Islamic architecture.”

Arslantepe Mound

Located in eastern Turkey, the 7,000-year-old ancient mound of Arslantepe was added to the UNESCO list just earlier this year.

The site was occupied from at least the sixth millennium BC until the late Roman period, says UNESCO, citing archeological evidence.

“The earliest layers of the Early Uruk period are characterized by adobe houses from the first half of the 4th millennium BCE.”

“The site illustrates the processes which led to the emergence of a State society in the Near East and a sophisticated bureaucratic system that predates writing … Exceptional metal objects and weapons have been excavated at the site, among them the earliest swords so far known in the world, which suggests the beginning of forms of organized combat as the prerogative of an elite, who exhibited them as instruments of their new political power.”

Diyarbakir fortress and Hevsel Gardens cultural landscape

The Diyarbakir Fortress, Hevsel Gardens, and its surrounding cultural landscape in Eastern Turkey were added by UNESCO in 2015 as a single listing.

The area “has been an important center since the Hellenistic period, through the Roman, Sassanid, Byzantine, Islamic, and Ottoman times to the present, the UN agency explains.

“The site encompasses the Inner castle, known as Ickale and including the Amida Mound, and the 5.8 km-long (3.6 miles) city walls of Diyarbakir with their numerous towers, gates, buttresses, and 63 inscriptions.”

Archaeological site of Troy

The legendary ancient city of Troy is located in the western province of Canakkale and was added to the list in 1998. “Troy, with its 4,000 years of history, is one of the most famous archaeological sites in the world,” according to UNESCO.

“In scientific terms, its extensive remains are the most significant demonstration of the first contact between the civilizations of Anatolia and the Mediterranean world.”

“The siege of Troy by Spartan and Achaean warriors from Greece in the 13th or 12th century BC, immortalized by Homer in the Iliad, has inspired great creative artists throughout the world ever since.”

Aphrodisias

Added by UNESCO in 2017, the archaeological site of Aphrodisias in present-day southwestern Turkey comprises of a temple to the Greek goddess Aphrodite that dates from the third century BC, along with a city constructed a century later.

“The wealth of Aphrodisias came from the marble quarries and the art produced by its sculptors,” adds UNESCO. “The city streets are arranged around several large civic structures, which include temples, a theatre, an agora, and two bath complexes.”

Hierapolis-Pamukkale

Pamukkale, a natural landmark known for its mineral-rich thermal waters and white travertine terraces, has long been a major tourist attraction in southwestern Turkey and was added to the list in 1988.

It is “an unreal landscape, made up of mineral forests, petrified waterfalls and a series of terraced basins,” according to UNESCO.

The adjacent site of Hierapolis was established at the end of the second century BC by the Attalid kingdom as a thermal spa. “The ruins of the baths, temples, and other Greek monuments can be seen at the site.”

Xanthos-Letoon

The ancient city of Xanthos-Letoon was added to the UNESCO list in 1988.

Serving as the capital of the ancient Lycian kingdom in current-day southwestern Turkey, it “illustrates the blending of Lycian traditions and Hellenic influence, especially in its funerary art,” the UN agency underlines.

“The epigraphic inscriptions are crucial for our understanding of the history of the Lycian people and their Indo-European language.”

Neolithic site of Catalhoyuk

Dating back 9,000 years, prehistoric Catalhoyuk is located in what is today central Turkey and was added to the list in 2012.

The site testifies “to the evolution of the social organization and cultural practices as humans adapted to a sedentary life,” according to UNESCO.

“The western mound shows the evolution of cultural practices in the Chalcolithic period, from 6200 BC to 5200 BC. Catalhoyuk provides important evidence of the transition from settled villages to urban agglomeration, which was maintained in the same location for over 2,000 years … It features a unique streetless settlement of houses clustered back to back with roof access into the buildings.”

Goreme National Park and rock sites of Cappadocia

UNESCO describes Cappadocia as “a spectacular landscape,” adding the site to its list in 1985.

The site is “entirely sculpted by erosion,” it says, adding that the Goreme valley and its surroundings contain “rock-hewn sanctuaries that provide unique evidence of Byzantine art in the post-Iconoclastic period.”

Gobeklitepe

The famed ancient site of Gobeklitepe is located in Turkey’s southeastern Sanliurfa province and was added to UNESCO’s list in 2018.

It “presents monumental round-oval and rectangular megalithic structures erected by hunter-gatherers in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic age” between 9,600 and 8,200 BC, according to UNESCO. “These monuments were probably used in connection with rituals, most likely of a funerary nature.”

“Distinctive T-shaped pillars are carved with images of wild animals, providing insight into the way of life and beliefs of people living in Upper Mesopotamia about 11,500 years ago.”

Mt. Nemrut

Located in the Kahta District of the Adiyaman province, Mt. Nemrut, towers 2,134-meters (7,001 feet) high and has been a UNESCO World Heritage site since 1987.

“The mausoleum of Antiochus I (69–34 BC), who reigned over Commagene, a kingdom founded north of Syria and the Euphrates after the breakup of Alexander’s empire, is one of the most ambitious constructions of the Hellenistic period,” says the UN agency.

“The syncretism of its pantheon, and the lineage of its kings, which can be traced back through two sets of legends, Greek and Persian, is evidence of the dual origin of this kingdom’s culture.”

Archaeological site of Ani

Ani, a medieval Armenian city that is often called “the City of 1,001 Churches,” is situated in the eastern Kars province on the Armenian border. The site was added to the UNESCO list in 2016.

The site “combines residential, religious and military structures, characteristic of a medieval urbanism built up over the centuries by Christian and then Muslim dynasties,” UNESCO says. “The city flourished in the 10th and 11th centuries CE when it became the capital of the medieval Armenian kingdom of the Bagratides and profited from control of one branch of the Silk Road.”

“The Mongol invasion and a devastating earthquake in 1319 marked the beginning of the city’s decline … The site presents a comprehensive overview of the evolution of medieval architecture through examples of almost all the different architectural innovations of the region between the 7th and 13th centuries CE.”

TURKISH press: Armenia colluded with Iran on drug trafficking to Europe for 30 years: Azerbaijan president

Jeyhun Aliyev   |16.10.2021


ANKARA

Following victory during last year’s Karabakh War, Azerbaijan prevented drug trafficking from Iran to Armenia, and further to the European countries, Azerbaijan’s president said Friday. 

“Over the past year, after Azerbaijan had regained control over the 130-kilometer (81-mile) section of the state border with Iran, which was under the control of Armenia for about 30 years, and thereby blocked a drug trafficking route from Iran through the Jabrayil district of Azerbaijan to Armenia and further to Europe, the volume of heroin we have seized in other sections of the Azerbaijan-Iran border has doubled compared to the same period of previous years. This suggests that for about 30 years, Armenia, in collusion with Iran, used the occupied territories of Azerbaijan to carry out drug trafficking to Europe,” Ilham Aliyev said while addressing the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Heads of State Council’s session via videoconference.

Aliyev emphasized that during the years of occupation by Armenian forces, he repeatedly said the occupied territories were being used “for drug trafficking and training of international terrorists.”

“It is a proven fact today,” he said.

Touching on the so-called “Armenian prisoners of war,” Aliyev said his country handed over all prisoners of war who were detained during the war “earlier than Armenia handed over Azerbaijani prisoners of war” to Baku. “More than two weeks after the signing of the Trilateral Statement (between Moscow, Baku and Yerevan), in late November last year, a sabotage group of 62 people infiltrated the rear of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces in the already liberated territories from the Shirak region of Armenia to commit subversions. It was disarmed and captured by Azerbaijani servicemen. In accordance with international conventions, these saboteurs cannot be considered prisoners of war,” he said.

He said the war and conflict “belong to the past,” and Azerbaijan is ready to start negotiations with Armenia on the delimitation of the border on the condition of mutual recognition of territorial integrity.

“We are also ready to launch negotiations on a peace agreement with Armenia. Azerbaijan, as a victorious country, is ready to normalize relations. We do hope that the Armenian leadership will not pass up on this historic opportunity,” he said.  

Mine clearance

Aliyev highlighted primary problems Azerbaijan is facing are related to the clearance of mines in liberated territories and the restoration of destroyed infrastructure, buildings, houses and historical sites of Azerbaijanis.

“Since the war ended, more than 150 Azerbaijani citizens have been killed or seriously injured by landmines. Armenia refuses to provide us with complete maps of the minefields. The few such maps that have been given to Azerbaijan have an accuracy of about 25%,” he said.

The president said that almost all buildings and historical sites in the liberated territories have been destroyed in almost 30 years of occupation.

“Of the 67 mosques in liberated territories, 65 have been completely destroyed. The remaining two, both in run-down condition, were used by the occupiers to keep pigs and cows, thus deliberately insulting the feelings of Muslims.”

He underlined that in Shusha — known as the pearl of Karabakh — Armenia destroyed 16 of 17 mosques that were there before the occupation.

“One mosque was left to demonstrate ‘tolerance,’ and there was an attempt to portray it as Persian with complicity from so-called specialists from Iran,” he said.

“Houses and public buildings were taken down brick by brick and sold to Armenia and Iran. This is the legacy of Armenian vandalism perpetrated in the territories of Azerbaijan,” said Aliyev.

The Azerbaijani leader also noted that “immense damage” has been caused to nature as around 60,000 hectares of forests have been “cut down, sawn and sold to Armenia and Iran.”

Illegal exploitation was carried out on Azerbaijan’s gold deposits and other natural resources, he said. 

Liberation of Karabakh

Relations between the former Soviet republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan have been tense since 1991 when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, also known as Upper Karabakh, a territory internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions.

New clashes erupted Sept. 27 last year that saw Armenia launch attacks on civilians and Azerbaijani forces and violate several humanitarian cease-fire agreements.

During the 44-day conflict, Azerbaijan liberated several cities and nearly 300 settlements and villages that were occupied for nearly three decades.

A Nov. 10, 2020, cease-fire deal mediated by Russia also included future efforts for a comprehensive resolution to the dispute.

The cease-fire is seen as a victory for Azerbaijan and a defeat for Armenia, whose armed forces withdrew in line with the agreement.

Before the victory, about 20% of Azerbaijan’s territory had been under illegal occupation.

On Jan. 11, Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia leaders signed a pact to develop economic ties and infrastructure to benefit the entire region. It also included the establishment of a trilateral working group on Karabakh.

Asbarez: Remembering Savey Tufenkian

Savey Tufenkian

BY MARY NAJARIAN

On September 9, at UACC, I attended the funeral of a dear friend, Savey Tufenkian. Three Los Angeles Bishops performed a beautiful memorial service. It was a touching and emotional experience to hear the personal stories read by her teary eyed grandchildren.

I got to know Savey when Medical Outreach brought 14 earthquake victims ages 2-14 to Los Angeles for surgeries, and prostheses. Savey took over the care of the seven children at Centinela Hospital. She slept at the hospital as the children needed a translator, and a counselor. All fourteen children had lost one.. two and some had lost all family members to the infamous Spitag earthquake of December 7,1988 which took the lives of 25,000 Armenians..

After six months in Los Angeles, the children had received their prostheses. Savey and I took the children back to Armenia. Our plan was to bring another fourteen children who needed prostheses.

Savey and I stayed ten days in Yerevan, visited different hospitals and finally went to the Orthopedic Hospital in Nor Marash where most amputees were. With the advice of the local doctors, we decided on 14 more patients to bring to Los Angeles.

It took a week to get the children ‘s passports and then their exit visas. As soon as the formalities were done, we made the travel arrangements to fly from Yerevan to Moscow, then a stopover in New York, and then to Los Angeles.

We knew the children needed visas to enter the USA, and the only American consulate which could issue an entry visa was in Moscow. In our previous experiences, we would typically go to the American Consulate, get the visas, and stay overnight in Moscow. On this occasion, I was afraid we might have difficulty finding a hotel, and perhaps end up staying longer than overnight. If that happened, I was afraid we would miss our flight to New York creating a very painful situation for the children.

To avoid such a possibility, we decided to get the visas at the customs in Los Angeles. So we got on the plane in Yerevan and after a short stopover in Moscow we flew to New York. We arrived at the airport at 3pm. We had a two hour stay before the flight to Los Angeles.

We got into the long customs line. The people waiting were kind enough to let our children in their wheel chairs, walkers and canes go to the front of the line.

I handed my passport to the officer in the booth, then Savey handed hers and then the children with passports in their hands came forward.

The first child handed her passport. The officer went through the pages, looked at us and said, Where is her entry visa? He looked through other passports and none of the children had visas.
“We were planning to get their visas here at the customs. ” I said.
The officer shook his head and made a telephone call.
Within seconds two policeman came and asked us to follow them. We were taken to a large room where there were several other police officers.

The one officer, the captain of the group, came over and asked with a stern voice. “You mean you are bringing these children to America with no entry visas? Don’t you know no one can enter USA without a visa? “Who are these children? Where are their parents?”

“They are Armenian children, earthquake victims. “ said Savey “ We are bringing them to USA for medical treatment.”

The captain asked us to follow them to another room while the children stayed with a female officer. All of a sudden over half a dozen more policeman with their guns and hand cuffs walked into the room. By this time we were scared and knew something was wrong.
The captain in charge looked straight first to Savey and then to me and asked.
“You know that you are smuggling 14 under age children to USA?”

Savey very self-confident answered, ”Sir, these are earthquake victims. We are taking them to LA for surgery, for treatment and prostheses. They don’t have proper medical care in the Soviet Union. We are Armenians and trying to help these Armenian children.”

“Madam, first of all, you don’t have power of attorney from their parents to take these children out of their homeland. Second ,you do not have entry visas. This looks very suspicious.…..As far as I can see this is a clear case of child trafficking.”
Savey turned to me and asked , “what is child trafficking”?
“ It’s bad. Don’t ask.” I murmured.

Two officers still with their hands on their guns, stood by the door and the rest went inside the adjoining room. We could hear the telephone conversation but did not know what was being said. After some time the captain came and in a firm voice said,
“ I have listened all that was said and you have two choices, ”You either get on the next plane with the fourteen children and go back to Armenia, or your second choice is to go to jail and wait for the immigration judge to resolve the situation .”
“What is our third choice?” Savey asked.
“Lady, you don’t seem to understand what I said. You are talking to an FBI agent. You have only two choices and you better decide on one.”

By now we realized the mess we were in, and could not hold back our tears.

I swallowed my tears and said. “This is not the first time we are bringing children. We brought fourteen children six months ago. Seven of them stayed at Shriners and the other seven at Centinela hospital. After six months , they all received their prostheses we took them back to Armenia. Now the two hospitals in LA know about these children are prepared to take care of them free of charge.” It looked like they were not interested in what I was saying.
I turned to Savey and said, “What are we going to do?”

“Mary, let’s take the second choice, it’s better to go to jail than return those children to Armenia. “
She turned to the officer and said, “ Sir ,we‘ll go to jail but please take care of the children. They must be admitted to the hospital immediately. “

After we had given our decision, the officers went back to the next room. We could hear there was a long discussion, more telephone calls, and after a while the captain walked towards us, and this time with a kind voice said, “We have checked and we do believe you two ladies are bringing the children for treatment. Your intention is virtuous but I hope you realize you did break the law.”

Another officer came and stamped entry visas in the children’s passports. And handed them to us. The captain shook our hands and wished us luck.

We got out of the room. Savey and I hugged and kissed and cried, but this time we cried from
joy.

Outside in the lobby a group of New York Armenians with gift bags of candy and toys welcomed the children. They had been waiting over three hours.

Savey’s tearful statement, was what touched the officer’s heart and convinced them that we were telling the truth.

“ Yes sir, we will go to jail but please take care of the children, they must be admitted to a hospital.”

Yes Savey, you were as always very kind and courageous. You were willing to go to jail as long as the Armenian children got their treatment.

Caught on Tape: Azerbaijani Soldiers Revel in Shooting Armenians in Artsakh

An Azerbaijani soldier aims his gun at Artsakh Defense Army positions on Oct. 14 (Screen capture from video released by Artsakh NSS)

Artsakh security forces released surveillance video on Friday showing how an Azerbaijani serviceman is breaching the ceasefire and opening gunfire at Armenian positions, while laughing.

The National Security Service of Artsakh said in a statement that since the beginning of October Azerbaijani military forces have definitely changed course and specifically have begun targeting civilians in their more active and intentional ceasefire violations. The NSS said that the provocations started in Martakert, where a civilian was killed and have continued, with the latest attack that injured six Artsakh soldiers on Thursday evening (local time).

Artsakh’s Defense Army reported that Azerbaijani forces opened fire at a military ambulance at 9 a.m. (local time) on Friday in Artsakh northeastern sector.

Azerbaijani forces opened fire at an Artsakh Army military ambulance on Oct. 15

The Artsakh Defense Ministry said there were no injuries, adding that the incident was reported to the Russian peacekeeping command.

The video from Thursday’s shooting that injured six soldiers shows an Azerbaijani soldier firing an AK-74 assault rifle at Armenian positions while another Azeri soldier is hiding behind the barracks. After firing several rounds, the shooter can be seen laughing before resuming his attack.

The NSS explained that in the past Azerbaijani forces would fire shots as warnings, not aiming at Artsakh Defense Army personnel. “However, in recent days the direction of the shots has changed dramatically, with civilians being targeted,” the NSS. said.

“Yesterday, Azerbaijani troops deployed in a position near the Nor Shen community of Martuni region shelled a nearby Armenian position set up to protect the population of the village. The nearly point-blank range shots were fired so explicitly that surveillance cameras of the Armenian side caught it on video,” the NSS said, stressing that the images prove that the Artsakh Defense Army continues to adhere to the ceasefire agreement, whereas the Azerbaijani side is intentionally violating it.

Artsakh’s State Minister Artak Beglaryan on Friday said that three of the six injured soldiers have had surgery to treat their wounds.

The Artsakh Foreign Ministry, in a statement issued on Friday, said that Azerbaijan’s policy of terrorism is aimed at intimidating the Artsakh population so they will leave the country.

“In the recent days, Azerbaijan has been trying to artificially escalate the situation in the region, and this is taking place while high-level meetings are underway,” the Artsakh foreign ministry said, adding that Azerbaijan wants Armenians to leave Artsakh, through its intimidation.

“This policy is also an affront to Russia and the Russian peacekeeping mission,” said the Artsakh foreign ministry.

“We once again reiterate that Artsakh will not be threatened by such actions. The Armenians of Artsakh are determined to live in their historical Homeland and defend their sovereignty and dignity,” added the Artsakh foreign ministry.

Armenia’s Foreign Ministry on Friday condemned what it called “the gross violation” of the ceasefire by Azerbaijani forces. The statement pointed to the shooting Thursday that resulted in the injury of six soldiers, as well as the killing of Aram Tepants, a farmer who was shot on October 9 in the same vicinity.

Emphasizing that Thursday’s incident was the second serious attack that has resulted in civilian and military casualties.

Armenia’s Yeraskh Village Under ‘Day and Night Attack’ by Azerbaijani Forces

Azerbaijani forces set 8,000 stacks of dried grass on fire in Armenia’s Yeraskh region on Oct. 15

The Yeraskh region of Armenia’s Ararat Province has been under “day and night attack” by Azerbaijani forces who are shooting from positions in Nakhichevan, warned Armenia’s Human Rights Defender’s Office.

In a statement, the Human Rights Defender’s Office reported ongoing shelling in Yeraskh on Friday, adding that Azerbaijani forces set ablaze 8,000 stacks of dried grass, stockpiled for use in the winter months to feed livestock. The fire spread to the roof of a nearby residence. Firefighters were able to extinguish the residential fire, preventing further structural damage.

Armenia’s Defense Ministry confirmed the reports, adding active shooting began at around 3 p.m. on Friday.

Armenia’s Human Rights Defender was alerted to the situation by residents who contacted his office, sounding the alarm on the escalating situation.

“Taking into consideration that the Azerbaijani positions are located in the immediate vicinity of the village, it is evident to the Azerbaijani servicemen know that their actions are harming residents, destroying their property and violating their rights to life and property,” the Human Rights Defender’s office said.

“The process of creating a demilitarized security zone around the borders of Armenia with Azerbaijan and the removal of the Azerbaijani armed forces form the vicinity of the villages and from the roads between the communities of Armenia should start immediately,” urged the Human Rights Defender’s office, whose proposal was included in a resolution passed on September 27 by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

“It is evident that the basis of these criminal harassments and the gross violations of human rights is the same: The policy of Armenophobia and enmity, and of ethnic cleansing and genocide by the Azerbaijani authorities,” said the Human Rights Defender’s office. “This policy has institutional roots, and until the perpetrators are punished, the violations will not end, and the security of the people will not be guaranteed.”