Fresno’s Armenians deserve a better, stronger voice than Apkarian

The Sun, Fresno –  The San Joaquin Valley Sun
Oct 14 2021

Last night, Armenian Americans in Fresno won a hard-earned victory. A lengthy push to name a public school within California’s third-largest school district after a local Armenian finally hit paydirt.

On a 6-0 vote, Fresno Unified School District trustees approved a move to change the name of J.C. Forkner Elementary School to H. Roger Tatarian Elementary School.

Despite a push from some of Fresno’s former Armenian elected officials and community members, one voice in the community was absent: Armenia’s Honorary Consul Berj Apkarian.

Writing as an Armenian, it’s a crying shame.

Appointed in 2014 as Fresno’s first-ever honorary consul to the Republic of Armenia, Apkarian has managed to launch a formal diplomatic presence out of Downtown Fresno’s Pacific Southwest Building.

Beyond a formal outpost, little can be said for advancing the interests of the region’s vibrant Armenian community or building anything resembling strong ties between Valley stakeholders and the Near East Republic.

This was no more apparent than last year, as Azeri and Turkish-backed forces swept into Armenian-controlled Nagorno-Karabakh and drove out the native Armenian government and population, with the confrontation ending in a deeply unpopular ceasefire agreement.

The conflict reignited cultural pride in Armenian Americans not seen in some time, albeit for differing reasons.

While some Armenians saw the conflict as teetering on the verge of another Armenian genocide – with cable news outlets delivering live coverage – others saw an anemic homeland incapable of defending itself badly in need of support from its diaspora.

Beneath it, however, was a rallying cry to unite.

For weeks, hundreds of Fresno Armenians gathered on the streets of California’s fifth-largest city to protest the conflict, hoping to draw attention to the hostile military action and rally support for Armenians in the struggle.

Yet, the Republic’s primary representative in the area – Apkarian – was notably silent.

The City of Fresno is home to roughly 45,000 Armenians, with the first arriving during the Hamidian massacres of the mid-1890s, making it one of the nation’s oldest and larger outposts.

Despite facing discrimination in housing upon mass migration during the 1915 Armenian Genocide, the population has strongly assimilated to California life after four generations.

And amid the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the Armenian community looked for someone to seize the clarion call locally.

They found it in the embrace of an unlikely figure: then-Fresno City President Miguel Arias.

Without prompting, Arias and city officials organized a flag raising ceremony to bolster awareness of the conflict half-way around the world and to convey a message to the sizable Armenian community that Fresno officials wer

In the week running up to the event, it was made clear by City Hall officials: Apkarian and his office were A.W.O.L. on the matter.

That is until the eleventh hour, as representatives of Fresno County’s five Armenian Churches (Holy Trinity, St. Paul, St. Gregory the Illuminator Armenian Apostolic, First Armenian Presbyterian, and Pilgrim Armenian Congregational Church), agreed to join City leaders to call for a peaceful resolution in favor of Armenia amid the flag raising.

Despite failing to serve as the catalyst for the event, Apkarian delivered a speech rife with empty platitudes befitting the Republic’s military performance.

The fundamental job of a diplomat is to leverage relationships with local officials to advance the agenda and interests of the homeland. That requires active engagement, not passive participation.

At a critical hour, Apkarian failed his duty and the local Armenian community.

More than one year later, the same Armenian community rallied to seek recognition for Roger Tatarian, an historic journalistic figure who fostered the development of newsmen nationwide while running UPI and returned home to leave an indelible impact on an entire generation of Fresno State graduates.

Leading the charge here was former Fresno Unified Trustee Michelle Arax Asadoorian and her brother, author and journalist Mark Arax.

Before Fresno Unified trustees unanimously voted to change the name of J.C. Forkner Elementary to honor Tatarian, a heated debate emerged between opponents castigating the name change as the latest specter of cancel culture and Armenians pressing for a school named after a luminary from the sizable local Armenian community.

Apkarian, once again, was M.I.A.

Enough.

Fresno’s Armenian community is not monolithic. It is largely divided among five churches within this county: three Apostolic, two Protestant; it ranges from post-Soviet emigrants to fourth-generation native-born Americans; and – like all Americans – it is a community made up of Republicans and Democrats.

The push to dedicate an Honorary Consul was not to have a ceremonial ribbon cutter. It was meant to serve as a voice of the Republic of Armenia and Armenians devoid of partisanship, in all senses of the word.

Ultimately, that role offers the officeholder the ability to advance the interests of the Republic and the diasporan Armenian community here in Fresno.

Instead, we’ve found ourselves an officeholder who has yet to step up and serve as an advocate for the benefit of the community.

Armenians in the San Joaquin Valley deserve a better voice. Perhaps, one day, that voice will occupy that honorable office.

Alex Tavlian
Alex Tavlian is the Executive Editor of The San Joaquin Valley Sun and Executive Director of Valley Future Foundation. You can reach Alex at .

Novel case: Armenia and Azerbaijan have been fighting over Nagorno-Karabakh …

India – Oct 14 2021
Armenia and Azerbaijan have been fighting over Nagorno-Karabakh, which is controlled by Azerbaijan but is populated by people of Armenian ethnicity, since 1991
Flag of Artsakh and also known as Nagorno-Karabakh Republic on an armored personnel carrier and soldiers with machine guns.
Shutterstock

Prabhakar Singh   |   Published 15.10.21, 12:21 AM

Armenia and Azerbaijan were in the news in September 2020 on account of their territorial dispute in Nagorno-Karabakh. On September 16, 2021, Armenia instituted proceedings against Azerbaijan before the International Court of Justice for alleged violations of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. On September 23, in a copycat move, Azerbaijan approached the ICJ, accusing Armenia of CERD violations, requesting the ICJ to direct it to “immediately cease and desist” from endangering Azerbaijani lives by “planting of landmines in Azerbaijan’s territory”.

Armenia and Azerbaijan have been fighting over Nagorno-Karabakh, which is controlled by Azerbaijan but is populated by people of Armenian ethnicity, since 1991. Nagorno-Karabakh is to Armenia what Crimea was to Russia with Azerbaijan in Ukraine’s shoes. Armenia’s application to the ICJ notes that the Azerbaijani president “routinely” uses derogatory language to brand ethnic Armenians as “bandits” and “barbarians”. The clash over Nagorno-Karabakh erupted with a musically choreographed threat of use of force — a first of its kind — with Azerbaijan’s army releasing a death metal music video touting its military might. According to Armenia, a stamp issued by Azerbaijan sought to ‘commemorate’ Baku’s violations of CERD by depicting a Nazi-style chemical ‘disinfecting’ Nagorno-Karabakh.

Armenia announced full mobilization in response. António Guterres paid the customary lip service expected of a UN secretary-general. Meanwhile, Iran, which borders both Azerbaijan and Armenia, offered its good offices for peace talks. Turkey spoke in support of Azerbaijan. Russia, a traditional ally of Armenia, called for an immediate ceasefire.

In 2008, the ICJ had found no jurisdiction when Georgia took Russia to the ICJ for CERD violations even as the court allowed provisional measures. Now Armenia has decided to invoke similar charges against Azerbaijan. In the Mavrommatis Concessions case, the Permanent Court of International Justice ruled a “dispute” to be “a disagreement on a point of law or fact, a conflict of legal views or of interests between two persons”. The ICJ’s advisory opinion in the Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania case defined a legal dispute in relation to a Convention as “a situation in which the two sides held clearly opposite views concerning the question of the performance or non-performance of certain treaty obligations”.

The CERD is an international convention to which both Armenia and Azerbaijan are signatories. All “good-faith” efforts, Armenia claims, for putting an end to Azerbaijan’s violations of CERD have failed. Article 22 of CERD allows the ICJ’s jurisdiction for treaty parties. The Armenian application to the ICJ contends that “[f]or decades, Azerbaijan has subjected Armenians to racial discrimination” and “Armenians have been subjected to systemic discrimination, mass killings, torture” that are illegal under CERD. Armenia further alleges that the end of hostilities and the November 2020 ceasefire notwithstanding, Azerbaijan has continued to “engage in the murder, torture and other abuse” of Armenian prisoners of war. In a prayer to the ICJ, Armenia has demanded that Azerbaijan release all Armenian PoWs and refrain from “espousing hatred” of Armenian ethnicity by “closing or suspending the activities of the Military Trophies Park”. A cursory reading of CERD makes it obvious that Azerbaijan is in violation of Article 5, recognizing political rights, civil rights, and equality before courts as well as right of access to “restaurants, cafes, theatres and parks”. Armenia has also asked for reparations from Azerbaijan under Article 6 of CERD.

With no legal basis for a ‘comprehensive settlement’ of the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute by international courts, Armenia lacks the military power or the appetite for actions that are illegal under the UN Charter. By championing people-centricity in an unsettled territorial dispute, Armenia is decentring an international law obsessed with territory and states.

At UN court, Armenia accuses Azerbaijan of ethnic hatred

WIVB4 – Buffalo, NY
Oct 14 2021
FILE – In this Saturday, Oct. 31, 2020 file photo, forest burns in the mountains after shelling by Azerbaijan’s artillery during a military conflict outside Stepanakert, the separatist region of Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenia accused neighboring Azerbaijan of systematically promoting ethnic hatred against Armenia citizens, as the two nations that fought a six-week war last year faced off at a United Nations court on Thursday Oct. 14, 2021. (AP Photo/File)

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Armenia accused neighboring Azerbaijan of systematically promoting ethnic hatred against Armenia citizens, as the two nations that fought a six-week war last year faced off at a U.N. court on Thursday.

Armenian representative Yeghishe Kirakosyan made the accusation as a hearing opened at the International Court of Justice into a request by Armenia for judges to impose urgent interim measures to prevent Azerbaijan breaching an international convention to stamp out ethnic discrimination.

Among measures Armenia wants the court to impose on Azerbaijan are an order to release and repatriate prisoners of war and halt hate speech aimed at Armenians.

The case stems from longstanding enmity that boiled over into last year’s war over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh that left more than 6,600 people dead. The region is within Azerbaijan but had been under the control of ethnic Armenian forces backed by Armenia since the end of a separatist war in 1994.

Kirakosyan said Armenia wasn’t asking the court to rule on the root causes of the war, but “seeks to prevent and remedy the cycle of violence and hatred perpetrated against ethnic Armenians.”

Lawyers representing Azerbaijan were scheduled to address the court later Thursday. Azerbaijan also has filed a similar case alleging discrimination against its citizens by Armenia and also has requested the world court to impose interim measures. Hearings in the Azerbaijan case are scheduled to start next Monday. Rulings on both requests will likely be issued in coming weeks.

Both nations’ cases alleging breaches of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination will likely take years to reach their conclusion at the Hague-based court.

Last year’s conflict ended when Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a Russia-brokered cease-fire agreement that granted Azerbaijan control over parts of Nagorno-Karabakh as well as adjacent territories occupied by Armenians.

Armenia says more than 3,700 Armenians and Nagorno-Karabakh residents died in the war. Azerbaijan said it lost 2,900 people.

Kirakosyan told the court that despite the deal that ended last year’s conflict, “Azerbaijan continues to espouse and actively promote ethnic hatred against Armenians.”

He said that Azerbaijan has “captured, tortured, and arbitrarily detained numerous members of Armenian armed forces and civilians of ethnic Armenian origin” and “continues to destroy Armenian cultural heritage and religious sites or negate the Armenian character, and the territory’s economic controls.”

​Armenia and Azerbaijan face off in UN court over ethnic discrimination case

Deutsche Welle, Germany
Oct 14 2021


Armenia and Azerbaijan face off in UN court over ethnic discrimination case

Both Armenia and Azerbaijan accuse the other of violating an international anti-discrimination convention in the wake of the Nagorno-Karabakh war. The conflict left thousands dead, and tensions continue.

   

Armenia told the ICJ it wants to ‘prevent and remedy the cycle of violence and hatred perpetrated against ethnic Armenians’

Armenia on Thursday accused Azerbaijan of promoting systematic ethnic hatred against Armenians, and urged judges at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague to issue an order to halt hate speech.

During opening arguments at the ICJ, Armenian representative Yeghishe Kirakosyan also asked the court to order the release and repatriation of prisoners of war taken during the conflict in late 2020.

The feud between the neighbors escalated into open war last year over the disputed region of Nargorno-Karabakh , which left well over 6,000 people dead.

Azerbaijani troops drove ethnic Armenian forces from territory that they had controlled since the 1990s in and around the region before Russia brokered a ceasefire.

“With this application, Armenia instead seeks to prevent and remedy the cycle of violence and hatred perpetrated against ethnic Armenians,” Kirakosyan said.

What is the legal background of the case?

Last month, Armenia filed a case with the ICJ, charging that Azerbaijan violated the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

After Armenia made its claim, Azerbaijan filed a counterclaim, accusing Armenia of violating the same treaty. Hearings on the Azerbaijani case are due before the court next week.

The hearing Thursday did not go into the merits of the case, but dealt with a request from Armenia to impose urgent interim measures to stop any violations while the court considers the larger case.

What has Azerbaijan said?

Azerbaijan is asking the court to order similar protective measures while the cases are ongoing, accusing Armenia of carrying out ethnic discrimination against Azerbaijanis.

Azerbaijzan’s deputy foreign minister, Elnur Mammadov, told the hearing via video link on Thursday that it is actually Armenia that was involved in “decadeslong ethnic cleansing.”

Mammadov also said Armenia’s request “is defective, and must be rejected.”

It will likely take years before ICJ judges reach a final ruling in the Armenia-versus-Azerbaijan case, but a ruling on emergency measures could come in weeks.

kb,wmr (AP, Reuters, dpa)

Armenia asks UN court to protect it from ‘hatred’ of neighbor Azerbaijan

Oct 14 2021

Azerbaijan has countersued Armenia in a separate case over an antidiscrimination treaty that will be heard next week.

A forest burns in October 2020 after shelling by Azerbaijan’s artillery during a military conflict with Armenia outside Stepanakert, in the separatist region of Nagorno-Karabakh. (AP Photo)

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (CN) — The United Nations’ top court heard opening arguments Thursday in Armenia’s request for temporary protective measures against its neighbor Azerbaijan.

Officials in Armenia’s capital of Yerevan have complained to The Hague-based International Court of Justice, or ICJ, that Azerbaijan’s government based in Baku violated a treaty outlawing racial discrimination during the 2020 conflict over the breakaway region Nagorno-Karabakh that left 6,500 people dead. 

“It is ethnic discrimination pure and simple,” lawyer Pierre d’Argent said on behalf of Armenia. Both countries are party to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which prohibits racial intolerance. 

The disputed 1,700-square-mile area technically falls within the borders of Azerbaijan, but 90% of its 150,000 inhabitants are ethnically Armenian. The area had been under the control of Armenian forces since an earlier war over the territory. Hostilities broke out again last year after a skirmish in a border region. 

Armenia wants the ICJ to order Azerbaijan to stop “espousing hatred of people of Armenian ethnic or national origin,” and specifically to close down a park created to celebrate Azerbaijan’s victory in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war. The Military Trophy Park opened in Azerbaijan’s capital in January 2021, displaying seized equipment and even the helmets of dead Armenian soldiers. 

Lawyers for Armenia cited multiple remarks made by Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev, calling Armenian people barbarians and vandals and claiming they are unable to build their own state so instead leech off of other nations.

“Generations upon generations are indoctrinated into this culture of fear and hate of anything and everything Armenian,” Armenia’s agent Yeghishe Kirakosyan told the court Thursday. 

Azerbaijan has countersued Armenia under the same treaty and has also requested provisional measures in a separate case that will be heard next week. In its rebuttal, its lawyers argue that it was Armenia, not Azerbaijan, that has engaged in ethnic cleansing. 

The Nagorno-Karabakh region has been a source of conflict since war first broke out over the territory in 1988, following the fall of the Soviet Union. A ceasefire was negotiated in 1994 after some 30,000 were killed, but the peace was fragile. Thirty soldiers were killed when more fighting broke out in 2016.

In an interview last week with France 24, President Aliyev said Azerbaijan was ready to “work on a future peace agreement.” 

Representatives for both countries will be allowed to respond in court Friday.

Azerbaijani, Iranian top diplomats try to turn down heat

EurasiaNet.org
Oct 14 2021
Joshua Kucera Oct 14, 2021
Trucks travel along a slice of Azerbaijani territory on the road that connects Iran with Armenia. (photo: Joshua Kucera)

The foreign ministers of Iran and Azerbaijan have spoken in an apparent attempt to decrease the temperature on the tensions that have erupted between the two sides in recent weeks.

Azerbaijan’s Jeyhun Bayramov spoke with his Iranian counterpart Hossein Amir-Abdollahian by phone on October 13. The readouts from both sides referred to the heated mutual accusations that Baku and Tehran have been hurling at the other and expressed a willingness to move beyond them.

“The two countries must prevent misunderstandings in their relations,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry said in its statement following the call. “Tehran and Baku have enemies and the two sides should not give the enemies the opportunity to disrupt relations between the two countries and concerns should be resolved through dialogue and cooperation.”

The Azerbaijani statement echoed that sentiment (minus the reference to “enemies”): “The sides noted the harmful rhetoric observed recently, which does not correspond to the level of friendly relations between our countries, and the need to resolve all differences through dialogue.”

The diplomatic outreach followed weeks of unprecedentedly hostile rhetoric between the two neighbors, as well as large-scale Iranian military exercises held on Azerbaijan’s border.

While the real cause of the vitriol remains unclear, the spark was the Azerbaijani authorities’ arrest in September of two Iranian truck drivers on a section of the main road through southern Armenia that passes through some slices of Azerbaijani territory.

Following the October 13 conversation, Iran announced that two Iranian prisoners currently held in Azerbaijan would be extradited to their home country, and some media mistakenly reported that the prisoners were the two truck drivers.

Both Bayramov and Amir-Abdollahian did mention the transit issue, though, suggesting the two sides were working on a way to resolve it.

As a result of Azerbaijan’s victory in the war last year over Armenia, it regained control of most of its territory along Armenia’s border that it had lost in the first war between the two sides in the 1990s. That included some slices of land through which the main road through Armenia passes. That road is the main artery between Armenia and Iran, and Iranian trucks use it to supply Armenia as well as – occasionally and controversially – Karabakh.

The two Iranian drivers arrested were reportedly shipping cargo to Karabakh, and while Azerbaijan’s customs service denied that they had been released, as they did so they made public some new information about the drivers, including their names and the crimes they have been charged with.

According to a statement from the customs service, the two drivers, Barzegar Haghi Jafar Ghazanfar and Norouzi Shahroud Heidar, were arrested for “smuggling” goods into Karabakh, crossing Azerbaijan’s border without permission and outside an official border crossing. (Karabakh is internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territory, and Baku takes a hard line on entries into the territory via Armenia.)

A criminal case has been launched and an investigation is underway, the customs service said: “Reports that they [Ghazanfar and Heidar] have been returned to their home country do not reflect the truth.”

The conversation between Bayramov and Amir-Abdollahian apparently touched on how to avoid these sorts of incidents in the future.

“Amir-Abdollahian … said Tehran expects that the problem of transit traffic of Iranian trucks in the Azerbaijan Republic will be solved,” the Iranian statement read. The Iranian side also said that Bayramov “suggested that the two countries’ customs officials hold talks to solve the problem of the transit of Iranian goods” and “stressed the pursuit of the release of two Iranian truck drivers detained in the Azerbaijan Republic,” though the Azerbaijani statement did not go as far on either of those points.

“It was decided to discuss issues related to transit transportation through the Republic of Azerbaijan by the way of direct contacts between relevant government agencies,” the Azerbaijani statement read.

Iran has already expressed its willingness to help Armenia construct a new road through southern Armenia into Iran that would avoid Azerbaijani territory.

In an October 13 interview with the Italian newspaper La Repubblica, Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev also touched on the Iranian transit issue. Aliyev reiterated earlier statements in which he described repeated demands to Tehran to do something about the Iranian trucks going to Karabakh.

“Please, pay attention to this illegal business activity in Karabakh by Iranian businessmen,” Aliyev said Azerbaijan had told Iran. “We were not in a position to accuse [the] Iranian government. We understood that it’s some private companies who do it. But we asked to stop it. What happened in return, everybody sees.”

 

Joshua Kucera is the Turkey/Caucasus editor at Eurasianet, and author of .

Armenia accuses Azerbaijan of ethnic hatred at UN court

Al-Jazeera, Qatar
Oct 14 2021

Azerbaijan denied the allegations made at the ICJ and accused Armenia of ‘decades-long ethnic cleansing’.

The International Court of Justice is the United Nations’ court for resolving disputes between countries [File: Yves Herman/Reuters]

Armenia has told judges at the International Court of Justice in The Hague that Azerbaijan promotes ethnic hatred against Armenians and asked the court to stop what its lawyers call a cycle of violence and hatred.

Armenia’s assertions, which Azerbaijan has denied, are part of a case it filed at the United Nation’s highest court last month that says Azerbaijan has violated the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, to which both states are signatories.

Thursday’s hearing does not go into the merits of the case but instead deals with Armenia’s request for emergency measures to stop the alleged violations, while the court considers the claim.

Both of the former Soviet republics, who battled for six weeks late last year over Azerbaijan’s breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, have lodged separate cases at the ICJ.

After Armenia’s claim was made public, Azerbaijan filed a counterclaim accusing Armenia of violating the anti-discrimination treaty. Azerbaijan is also seeking that the court order protective measures while the case is ongoing.

Lawyers for Armenia accused Azerbaijan’s authorities of fostering ethnic hatred and a culture where murder and torture of ethnic Armenians were “systematic”.

“With this application, Armenia instead seeks to prevent and remedy the cycle of violence and hatred perpetrated against ethnic Armenians,” said Yeghishe Kirakosyan, Armenia’s representative.

“And in its request for provisional measures, Armenia urgently seeks to protect the rights of ethnic Armenians from imminent irreparable harm.”

Kirakosyan said the six-week war that Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev “has openly admitted Azerbaijan started in September 2020 is the most recent link to this chain of ethnic violence and hate.

“We fear that it will not be the last until the roots of this conflict are addressed.

“Generations upon generations are indoctrinated into this culture of fear and hate of anything and everything Armenian,” Kirakosyan said.

‘Obviously hopeless’

Azerbaijan’s Deputy Foreign Minister Elnur Mammadov told the court via video link later on Thursday that it was actually Armenia that was involved in “decades-long ethnic cleansing”.

Lawyers for Azerbaijan dismissed Armenia’s complaint as “obviously hopeless” and accused it of using the UN court to score political points.

In fighting late last year, Azeri troops drove ethnic Armenian forces out of swaths of territory they had controlled since the 1990s in and around the Nagorno-Karabakh region, before Russia brokered a ceasefire.

The conflict claimed more than 6,500 lives.

Both sides have long traded accusations of rights abuses, including in last year’s war.

The ICJ, also known as the World Court, is the UN court for resolving disputes between countries.

The court has yet to determine whether it has jurisdiction in this case. It will take years before judges reach a final ruling in the Armenia versus Azerbaijan case, but they could rule on possible emergency measures in just weeks.

SOURCE: NEWS AGENCIES

Garo Paylan, 3 other opposition MPs may be stripped of immunity

Panorama, Armenia
Oct 14 2021

A bill to strip ethnic Armenian MP Garo Paylan from the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) and three other opposition lawmakers has been submitted to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, Ermenihaber reports.

The bill has been drafted by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s office.

Two of the MPs are also from the HDP, and one represents the Democratic Regions Party (DBP).

Music: Narek Hakhnazaryan to perform within the framework of Armenia Festival

Panorama, Armenia
Oct 14 2021

CULTURE 18:20 14/10/2021 ARMENIA

Renowned cellist Narek Hakhnazaryan will perform with the Armenian State Symphony Orchestra (ASSO) on the sidelines of the Armenia International Music Festival.

The concert is scheduled to be held at the Karen Demirchyan Sports and Concerts Complex in Yerevan on October 15, at 8pm, ASSO reports.

The program features Ghazaros Saryan’s Symphonic Panel “Armenia”, Pyotr Tchaikovsky’s Pezzo Capriccioso, Op. 62, for cello and orchestra and Alexey Shor’s Cello Concerto in F major. The conductor is Marius Stravinsky.

​​Artsakh’s Defense Army confirms ceasefire violation by Azerbaijan

Public Radio of Armenia
Oct 14 2021

Artsakh’s Defense Army confirms ceasefire violation by Azerbaijan

 October 14, 2021, 23:48 

In the evening of October 14, the Azerbaijani armed forces opened fire on a military base of the Defense Army located on the eastern border of the Artsakh Republic, Artsakh’s Defense Ministry said in a statement.

It confirmed that six servicemen were wounded. The incident was immediately reported to the command of the Russian peacekeeping troops in Artsakh.

The Ministry of Defense of the Artsakh Republic declares that it continues to adhere to the ceasefire regime and calls on the Azerbaijani side to refrain from destabilizing actions.