Burning Books: Akram Aylisli on Literature and Cultural Memory

Los Angeles Review of Books
Feb 27 2021

ON FEBRUARY 9, 2013, the works of writer Akram Aylisli were publicly burned in Azerbaijan because his writing upset the Azerbaijani government. Aylisli watched his books burn via the internet, an experience he describes in a 2018 essay excerpted in this very magazine. Azerbaijan’s president Ilham Aliyev stripped Aylisli of the title of “People’s Writer” and his presidential pension; his wife and son were fired from their jobs, and he received death threats. In 2014, Aylisli was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by supporters from several countries. In March 2016, he was invited to address a literary festival in Venice, Incroci di civiltà; however, the 79-year-old writer was detained at the Baku airport, and trumped-up legal charges were filed against him. Those charges are still pending.

In December 2020, Aylisli joined scholar Mark Lipovetsky, Azeri-American journalist Alex Raufoglu, and translator Katherine E. Young for his first public appearance in many years at the virtual event “Burning Books: Akram Aylisli, Literature, and Human Rights in Today’s Azerbaijan.” During the event, Aylisli took questions from a worldwide audience. He addressed the recent resumption of armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan — Azerbaijani forces prevailed in the fall 2020 fighting — a longstanding conflict depicted most notably in Stone Dreams, part of Aylisli’s trilogy Farewell, Aylis: A Non-Traditional Novel in Three Works (Academic Studies Press, 2018, trans. Katherine E. Young). He also discussed literature, his continuing legal troubles in Azerbaijan, and his faith in human empathy. The event was sponsored by Columbia University’s Harriman Institute and Institute for the Study of Human Rights and PEN America. Mark Lipovetsky moderated the audience Q-and-A. Aylisli spoke in Russian from his home in Baku, Azerbaijan, where he continues to live under de facto house arrest. His remarks have been translated, edited, and condensed by Katherine E. Young; full transcripts of his remarks in Russian and an English translation are available here, along with video of the event.

¤

MARK LIPOVETSKY: In March 2016, you were slated to deliver a speech at a literary festival in Venice, but could not attend because you were denied permission to leave Azerbaijan. You later published the remarks you’d planned to give. At the start of the speech, you write, “Now we are all defenseless before these inconceivably cruel times. There are periods in history when nothing can fill the emptiness of the human heart: not religion, not science, not literature.” Do you feel the same way now, and what does it mean to be a writer in such times?

AKRAM AYLISLI: I’d like to first of all clarify the circumstances of my situation that not everyone understands completely. They made me sign an agreement not to travel, so I don’t have the right to leave the confines of Baku. What’s more, the prosecutor’s office confiscated my proof of identity. Without that proof, a person has no actual rights — can’t take part in elections or anything. The prosecutor’s office was supposed to investigate my case within a year, according to Azerbaijani law. But to this day, the case that was opened in March 2016 hasn’t been reviewed. They simply aren’t processing it. This all weighs very, very heavily on me psychologically, and all of it puts pressure on me. But I think some people are starting to overcome the anxiety they felt about the fact that part of Azerbaijan’s land was, let us say, under the control of Armenia. They’ve calmed down a bit, and I think [laughs] that calm will in some way make a difference in my life. They’ll calm down and finally say: “So what about this guy? How much can we really cut him off from society? This kind of thing isn’t good for him.” I think this will all pass. I’m sure of it.

In terms of how I live in this difficult time, it seems to me that no matter what the circumstances, no matter what situation a writer lives in, he lives in his own world. For example, I didn’t feel the loss of what was taken from me very deeply, and I wasn’t depressed because I never remembered myself being free. I never felt that: not in school, not at university, not at work. I felt myself to be a little bit free only at my work table, my writing desk. They couldn’t take that away from me. It can’t be taken away from any writer. I live now through literature. It’s possible to live through literature — there’s a lot of air there. More, maybe, than there is even in the street, especially during a pandemic.

From your trilogy Farewell, Aylis, which of these novels — YemenStone Dreams, and A Fantastical Traffic Jam — is the most important for you?

If I think about it, Stone Dreams. I wrote Stone Dreams for Azerbaijanis, not Armenians. I wrote it out of the desire that not all of the bridges between our peoples would be burned. So that there would not be this deep alienation, particularly in terms of culture. We are, after all, a Turkic people, but in point of fact we are people of the Caucasus. Our mentality is of the Caucasus — not Turkish, not Central Asian, specifically of the Caucasus. I wrote Stone Dreams out of the desire to bring people closer, so that people wouldn’t think that we have to revile one another, that we have to kill one another.

Who has supported you? Are there writers, cultural figures, who supported you in Russia and Azerbaijan?

In general, the Russian intelligentsia defended me a great deal — Andrei Bitov, Viktor Yerofeyev. That level of writer — important writers — really defended me. A few Russian journalists, also. In Azerbaijan, my support mainly came from young writers. Among them, many people understood things as I understand them, and in the way people will someday understand.

How can we, readers living all over the world, help you?

You’re already helping me. We’re sitting here, today I’m looking at you, at such good-hearted people. That joy is enough for me, if only for a few days. Sometimes you suddenly remember such good moments, and that helps you live. I don’t know how exactly readers can help. Many organizations wanted to help me. In Norway, they even proposed an excellent situation so that I could move there. I didn’t go, because someday these people will understand that I love Azerbaijan more than they do. I think there are individuals among the Azerbaijani people who know that I love Azerbaijan more than the authorities do. It’s dangerous to say so [laughs], but it’s necessary.

What are you writing now? You said that you’re saving yourself through literature.

I am saving myself through literature. And I’m saving myself only through literature, if I’m honest with you. How am I saving myself? I’ve written several things after these events that are very important for me. But you know what happened to me. I had a very good translator in Moscow, Tamara Kalyagina, who translated me for many years. And I had print runs of my books published in the USSR of more than a million copies, thanks to her translations. But after she died, I lost contact with my Russian audience. Now I write solely for an Azerbaijani audience.

But you also translate yourself into Russian?

I started translating. Now, it’s difficult for me to translate myself. For me, translation is an enormous labor. It’s easier to write than translate. For example, I’ve translated an enormous number of pages into Azeri, pages from Turgenev, Paustovsky, Böll, García Márquez, Shukshin, Aitmatov, many writers. I had energy then. Now I conserve my energy to write, if only in Azeri. I’m not a native speaker of Russian, but when I enter the element of the Russian language and begin to translate, I don’t translate badly, and it turns out well.

And you yourself translated Stone Dreams into Russian, right?

Right. With the help of a native Russian speaker.

Who influenced you as a writer? Who is important to you as an authority on writing?

Different writers influenced me during different periods. I was first dazzled by Heinrich Böll. It seemed to me that we’d been born in the same place, lived in a single village — that’s how close his work felt to me. And then, of the Russian writers, I really, deeply loved the early work of Maxim Gorky. He captivated me by showing that this life is hard, by dreaming about a better life. And of the Russians, now, I’m most attracted to Ivan Bunin. Bunin is also close to something in my soul. His daydreams, that particular style he has, his calm prose, that’s what speaks to me. My favorite American writer is John Steinbeck. I love him deeply.

The Azerbaijani epics influenced me most of all. The kind where there is a dream, a person wants to be a hero, to do something good for others. In early childhood, I especially loved fairy tales. And to this day I love fairy tales. It seems to me that everything we write is a fairy tale. I think Gabriel García Márquez, for example, is a teller of tales. It’s hard to find a better storyteller than García Márquez. He’s a storyteller in everything. Especially in One Hundred Years of Solitude — he’s a consummate storyteller. That whole book is a complete fairy tale.

Now I’ll be reading questions submitted through the Zoom chat. Why is there such hatred on the part of Azerbaijanis toward Armenians, and why is history being falsified?

Thank you for the question. I know few Armenians who who’d harbor any kind of hatred toward Azerbaijanis. And my personal Azerbaijani friends don’t harbor any hatred for Armenians, either. I don’t think anyone is capable of destroying our cultural connections with Armenia. That culture brought us together and will bring us together again, I want to hope. These days there is no hope for politicians. All hope rests in such time-honored values as culture, our songs, our dances, the ones we dance together. There’s no other Turkic people, except Azerbaijanis, who could dance to this kind of music. I still preserve hope, because culture is a sturdier material than politics. Politics is always moving on, but there’s nothing transient about culture. I hope there will come a time when culture will bring us together, will summon us to good.

How can a dialogue be restored after recent fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan and continuing human rights violations in Nagorno-Karabakh?

The Armenian people are seriously traumatized. I would very much like for that trauma to pass as quickly as possible. During the recent fighting, it seemed as if everyone would help the Armenians, but in fact no actual help arrived. If the Russian army hadn’t been there, if Russian peacekeeping forces hadn’t gone into Nagorno-Karabakh, what mischief would have gone on there? I think there would have been terrible carnage. Thank God, that carnage didn’t happen. But these wounds of Armenia are very deep. Only the Armenian people can heal these wounds — the spirit of the people, their faith in their own history, their own power. And with regard to politics, I still think that Armenians should not have believed their politicians; the patriotic fanaticism we see from several Armenian leaders is no less than what’s in some of our own leaders, and that’s very harmful for getting things back on the right track, for bringing things back to normal. And I do think there are Azerbaijanis who would like for Armenians to rise, stand on their feet, and solve their problems. There’s so much to say, I’m overcome with emotion. It’s hard for me to talk about this issue because I’ve always considered these tragedies to be my own personal tragedies. I take in all these wars, the pain of any person, the death of any young person, that’s my own grief. That’s who I was and who I remain. How else to help, I don’t know.

Would it be interesting for you to write a utopia and describe the kind of Azerbaijan or Caucasus that you’d like to see?

I’d like that very much. By nature, I’m an idealist. I didn’t ever imagine that this would all lead to such a bloodbath. I think that our Caucasus culture and mentality will help the leaders of the countries solve their own problems. I always think: If they don’t solve these problems, no one will solve them and, in fact, no one has solved them. Who can solve your domestic problems? For the world, the Caucasus is just a small sliver of the planet. I wrote Stone Dreams so that Armenians and Azerbaijanis wouldn’t be eternal enemies. I don’t think I did anything heroic. I just didn’t want these two peoples to lose one another, to lose their own memories.

Your decision to remain in Azerbaijan is not unlike the decision of Socrates, whose students proposed that he flee Greece. Are there any historical figures that serve as examples for you in this difficult situation?

It helps me to think about the fate of many writers who were in a worse situation than I am. The memory that I’m not alone and never have been. It’s not possible that one person thinks of something sacred, something big, and others haven’t thought of it. If a writer thinks of something good, it means that many people are thinking of it, not just that writer alone. A writer simply expresses the soul of the people. A real, genuine writer is never alone.

What do you think now, almost 30 years after the end of the Soviet Union, about the legacy of the Soviet Union, the relationships between the republics that were part of it, and the role played by the Russian language? And what do you think about so-called “multinational” Soviet literature, about how relations were constructed between the center and the republics, between languages?

It’s really a very simple question. For example, I studied at the Literary Institute in Moscow in the same class with such writers and poets as Vasily Belov, Gennady Rusakov, Viktor Astafyev, Yevgeny Yevtushenko, Bella Akhmadulina. Many famous people were at the Literary Institute then. They were driven out of the Literary Institute, I remember. But the personal connections remained very close. Different events took place in different republics. Writers got together, writers shared their own thoughts. These days it’s only through the internet that some kind of connection exists. Perhaps that’s easier for many people, but for my generation, that living connection was a normal thing.

In the speech you wanted to deliver in Venice, you write that not just specifically the society in which you live but the world as a whole is at a dead end, that the world suffers from an emptiness that’s filled up with nationalism. Almost five years have passed since then. Does your diagnosis remain the same?

I’m convinced that this is so, even now. Shaitan, the devil himself, is always on duty; where there’s emptiness, he can crawl in and do his terrible deeds. The devil’s emptiness is personified by the superpatriot. Every government says, “My national interest is most dear to me.” Nothing can be more harmful than that. What kind of national interest can there be if all nations are experiencing an epidemic of flu [sic] that no one can get away from? This is killing humanity, this pride, this “my country above everything” mentality. What can the interests of your people be if the whole world is now in danger? What can territorial unity be if the whole planet is a single territory that’s under threat? Now the slogan of all leaders of all states is “I am for my national interest.” This seems to me to be a parody, even. This is even spitting in the face of God, in the face of nature, in the face of humanity: “My interest is more important to me.” What kind of interest? If your neighbor is in a terrible situation, how can you be happy, if you’re human?

Thank you very much. I think your last answer is very important, and we’re going to leave it there.

I am so happy to be with you, if only in an online conversation. I’ll remember all of this, our meeting today — I’ll remember it all my life. I wish you all happiness and good health. Don’t get sick in the pandemic there. Beware of evil in any form, beware of any form of evil. Thank you so much.

¤

Akram Aylisli is an Azerbaijani writer, playwright, novelist, and editor, who was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in connection with his novella Stone Dreams. He currently lives under de facto house arrest in Baku, Azerbaijan.

Katherine E. Young is the author of Woman Drinking Absinthe and poet laureate emerita of Arlington, Virginia. She is the translator of Anna Starobinets, Akram Aylisli, Inna Kabysh, and numerous Russophone poets; she received a 2017 National Endowment for the Arts fellowship to translate Akram Aylisli’s Farewell, Aylis.

 

Locals remember Kurd awarded medal by Pope Pius XI for protecting Armenians fleeing genocide

Rudaw – Kurdistan Porvince, Iraq
March 6 2021
5 hours ago
Yousif Musa

ZAKHO, Kurdistan Region — When Armenians fled the Ottoman Empire’s genocidal campaign during World War I, a Kurdish tribal leader in Zakho embraced them. Locals still remember the man, who was awarded a medal in 1925 by the worldwide Catholic Church’s leader at the time for his lifesaving work.

Mohammed Shammadin Agha Selvan played a pivotal role in sheltering Armenians fleeing between 1916 and 1918. He was recognized by Pope Pius XI for his work protecting Christians from brutality. In 1925, the Catholic leader awarded Selvan a medal.

During the Armenian Genocide – the systematic killing and deportation of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century – approximately 1.5 million Armenians were killed.

Along with the Turks and other peoples, a number of Kurdish tribes, mainly as part of the Ottoman Army, participated in the killing of Armenians during the genocide. Other Kurds like Selvan opposed the mass killings, hiding and sometimes adopting members of the ethnic group.

Nearly a century on, Selvan’s descendants have proudly kept this award left by their ancestor.

“This is the award presented to my grandfather, late Mohammed Shammadin Agha Selvan by Pope Pius XI,” Saad Mohammed Haji Agha told Rudaw on Thursday. “Despite all the hardships, displacement and difficulties our nation saw across different periods of time from 1958 to 1991 and to 2003, and from 2003 up to now, we have kept this award safe and passed it from one generation to the other.”

According to Selvan’s grandson, the leader was the mayor of Zakho in the 1920s.

The awarding of Selvan came after the Virgin Mary Assyrian Church sent official correspondence to the Vatican, praising the Kurdish leader’s role giving Armenian’s shelter on his land and property.

“Our church was the first to be built in Zakho. In 24 hours, [Ottoman] soldiers arrived in Zakho from Mosul. Mohammed Agha came to our church to protect us from the attack,” Polis Henna, a retired priest from Zakho.

Over 2,000 Armenians currently live in the Kurdistan Region, according to Yerwant Nisan, an Armenian community leader and former MP in the Kurdistan Region’s parliament.

The vast majority, around 2,000, are in Duhok province, and 200 live in Erbil. Another 800 Armenians live in Kirkuk, a province disputed between Erbil and Baghdad.

Residents of Afza Rok Miri, an Armenian village in Zakho, still praise Selvan’s role protecting their ancestors who made it to the present-day Kurdistan Region during the genocide.

“My late uncle told me ‘never forget what was done for us [by Selvan],” said Sarkis Yousif, an Armenian resident of the village.

The Constitution of the Kurdistan Region recognizes Armenians as a distinct ethnic group, providing them the right to education in their mother tongue education, and reserves them one seat in parliament.

There are six Armenian churches in the Kurdistan Region – four in Duhok province, and one in Erbil.

Translation by Zhelwan Z. Wali

Armenian opposition announces plans to meet with president Sunday

TASS, Russia
March 6 2021
The opposition calls on Armen Sarkissian to appeal against Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s proposal to sack the chief of the General Staff at the Constitutional Court until March 9

YEREVAN, March 6. /TASS/. Representatives of Armenia’s opposition Homeland Salivation Movement plan to hold another meeting with President Armen Sarkissian on Sunday at his request to discuss the dismissal of Chief of the General Staff Onik Gasparyan, an opposition politician said at a rally in Yerevan on Saturday.

“Tomorrow, representatives of Homeland Salvation Movement are again meeting with president at his initiative. We will certainly hand him our demands, namely to appeal the decree on dismissal of the General Staff chief at the Constitutional Court,” Ishkhan Sagatelyan said.

The opposition calls on Sarkissian to appeal against Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s proposal to sack the chief of the General Staff at the Constitutional Court until March 9.

Armenia has been gripped in a political crisis after the country’s General Staff had issued a statement demanding the prime minister and the government step down on February 25. Pashinyan slammed that move by the top brass as an attempted military coup and have submitted twice to the president the decree to sack the chief of the General Staff. Since the crisis broke out in Armenia, the opposition has held two meetings with the president to discuss Gasparyan’s resignation.

Experts urge greater cooperation between India, Armenia to counter Turkey

OP India
March 6 2021

India should increase cooperation with Armenia in response to Turkey’s dalliance with Pakistan, experts argue

One of the direct impacts of the war was that the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), the largest Armenian American political organization, urged the United States to demand the blacklisting of Pakistan by the FATF for funding “Jihadist Mercenaries” against Armenia.

One of the most significant geopolitical events of 2020, if not the most important, was the Nagorno-Karabakh War between Azerbaijan and Armenia where the former secured strategic victories over the latter. During the conflict, Azerbaijan received support from Turkey and Pakistani fighters reached the region as well in order to aid Azerbaijan’s war efforts.

One of the direct impacts of the war was that the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), the largest Armenian American political organization, urged the United States to demand the blacklisting of Pakistan by the FATF for funding “Jihadist Mercenaries” against Armenia.

Now, regional analysts believe India and Armenia should enhance cooperation between themselves in order to counter the Pakistan-Turkey nexus. In recent times, Turkey has backed Pakistan over key matters such as Kashmir. Reports have also surfaced which link radical Islamist organisations like PFI coordinating with Erdogan backed Turkish NGOs.

Yeghia Tashjian, regional analyst and researcher, at a webinar organised by New Delhi based international observer group Red Lantern Analytica (RLA) on the 5th of March, said that Turkey is attempting to establish an alliance with countries such as Pakistan in order to counter the influence of India and Russia.


The subject of the webinar was “Deciphering Hatred: Armenian genocide by Turkey & Hindu and Sikh Genocide by Pakistan”.

Tashijan is of the opinion that India, Iran and Armenia should increase cooperation between themselves to curtail Turkish expansionism under Erdogan. To further his point, he said that there is a legitimate threat that Turkey might send its mercenaries to Kashmir.

Anush Ghavalyan, an analyst from Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh), said that Artsakh had received a great deal of support from Indians on social media and hoped that India will continue its support for the region.

During the conflict, India had announced that it India “followed with great concern the escalation of hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh with considerable ingress of Armenian forces into Azerbaijan” and had called for “respecting each other’s’ territorial integrity and inviolability of existing borders”.


Turkey was responsible for the infamous Armenian genocide, when a million ethnic Armenians were targeted through systematic ethnic cleansing by the Ottoman Empire during World War 1.

Thus far, India has maintained strategic neutrality regarding the matter. However, given Turkey’s recent inclinations, experts argue that India should respond by increasing its cooperation with Armenia at an international level.

Armenia Withdraws From Eurovision, Greek-Armenian Singer Misses Opportunity Again

Greek City Times
March 6 2021
by Paul Antonopoulos

Armenia has withdrawn from this years Eurovision competition, meaning Greek-Armenian Athena Manoukian, for the second year in a row, will not participate in the singing competition.

AMPTV said: “After careful and detailed discussions, the Public Television Company of Armenia has decided to withdraw from the Eurovision Song Contest 2021.

The television station considered that “the shortness of production time as well as other objective reasons […] make the proper participation of Armenia at ESC 2021 impossible.”

Martin Österdahl, Executive Supervisor of the Eurovision Song Contest, said:

“The EBU (European Broadcasting Union) community is deeply sorry that AMPTV has decided to withdraw from participating in this year’s Eurovision Song Contest.

“Armenia have a great record at the Eurovision Song Contest and always bring excitement and quality performances to the stage.

“We understand the reasons for their withdrawal and we will miss their hard working and professional delegation in Rotterdam.

“We very much hope to welcome Armenia back in 2022.”

Manoukian, who was born in Athens, will once again miss out on participating in Eurovision as last year’s event was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Athena Manoukian.

The 26-year-old was expected to perform her song “Chains On You.”

– Greek City Times

In 2018, Manoukian performed on The X Factor UK and impressed Ayda Field, Robbie Willians, Louis Tomlinson and most impressively, even Simon Cowell.

Earlier this year, she released the single “You Should Know.”

Zarif, Armenian counterpart discuss regional security

MEHR News Agency, Iran
March 6 2021

TEHRAN, Mar. 06 (MNA) – Iranian Foreign Minister and his Armenian counterpart stressed the significance of addressing regional challenges in a phone talk on Saturday.

Foreign Minister of Armenia Ara Ayvazian had a telephone conversation with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran Mohammad Javad Zarif, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia.

The Foreign Ministers exchanged views on issues of the bilateral agenda. The sides expressed satisfaction with the dynamics of the development of relations based on centuries-old friendship and mutual readiness to strengthen it further was reaffirmed, including through the activation of political dialogue at various levels.

The interlocutors touched upon regional security and stability issues. The Ministers highlighted the role of coordinated cooperation in addressing new regional challenges.

FA/PR

Top Diplomats Discuss Iran-Armenia Ties

TASNIM News Agency, Iran
March 6 2021
  • March, 06, 2021 
Zarif, Armenian counterpart discuss regional security – Mehr News Agency

TEHRAN, Mar. 06 (MNA) – Iranian Foreign Minister and his Armenian counterpart stressed the significance of addressing regional challenges in a phone talk on Saturday.

Foreign Minister of Armenia Ara Ayvazian had a telephone conversation with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran Mohammad Javad Zarif, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia.

The Foreign Ministers exchanged views on issues of the bilateral agenda. The sides expressed satisfaction with the dynamics of the development of relations based on centuries-old friendship and mutual readiness to strengthen it further was reaffirmed, including through the activation of political dialogue at various levels.

The interlocutors touched upon regional security and stability issues. The Ministers highlighted the role of coordinated cooperation in addressing new regional challenges.

FA/PR

Secretary Blinken’s Call with Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan

March 6 2021

Blinken’s Call with Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan

READOUT

OFFICE OF THE SPOKESPERSON

MARCH 5, 2021

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken spoke with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan today. Secretary Blinken and Prime Minister Pashinyan emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Armenia bilateral partnership. The Secretary stressed the significance of respect for the rule of law and democratic institutions, and he expressed our continuing support for the development of democratic processes and institutions in Armenia. The Secretary welcomed efforts to achieve a lasting political settlement to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict benefiting the people of the region.

US top diplomat Blinken held talks with Armenian PM Pashinyan on bilateral issues

TASS, Russia
March 6 2021
The Secretary of State Antony Blinken welcomed efforts to achieve a lasting political settlement to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

WASHINGTON, March 6. /TASS/. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan held a telephone conference discussing key issues of bilateral importance, including the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the US Department of State said in a statement.

“Secretary Blinken and Prime Minister Pashinyan emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Armenia bilateral partnership,” the statement from the US Department of State reads.

“The Secretary stressed the significance of respect for the rule of law and democratic institutions, and he expressed our continuing support for the development of democratic processes and institutions in Armenia,” according to the statement.

“The Secretary welcomed efforts to achieve a lasting political settlement to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict benefiting the people of the region,” the statement added.

On November 9, 2020, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a joint statement on a complete ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh starting from November 10.

The Russian leader said at that time that the Azerbaijani and Armenian sides would maintain the positions that they had held and Russian peacekeepers would be deployed to the region. Besides, Baku and Yerevan must exchange prisoners and the bodies of those killed.

Renewed clashes between Azerbaijan and Armenia erupted on September 27, with intense battles raging in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh. The area experienced flare-ups of violence in the summer of 2014, in April 2016 and in July 2020. Azerbaijan and Armenia have imposed martial law and launched mobilization efforts. Both parties to the conflict have reported casualties, among them civilians.

Blinken Speaks to Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan About Rule of Law, Karabakh Settlement

SPUTNIK
March 6 2021
© AP Photo / Andrew Caballero-Reynolds
World

01:28 GMT 06.03.2021Get short URL

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) – US Secretary of State Antony Blinken spoke to Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan about the importance of rule of law and welcomed the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement, State Department spokesperson Ned Price said in a statement.

“The Secretary stressed the significance of respect for the rule of law and democratic institutions, and he expressed our continuing support for the development of democratic processes and institutions in Armenia. The Secretary welcomed efforts to achieve a lasting political settlement to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict benefiting the people of the region,” Price said on Friday.

A political crisis erupted in Yerevan after the deputy chief of the Armenian general staff mocked Pashinyan’s controversial comment about the alleged failure of Russian-supplied Iskander missiles during the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. This triggered a series of military dismissals. The armed forces issued a statement demanding the resignation of Pashinyan himself.

The Armenian prime minister regarded this as an attempted coup and called on his supporters to take to the streets. Meanwhile, the opposition raised barricades and a tent camp near the parliament, demanding Pashinyan to resign.

Commenting on the developments, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said that the use of Iskander missiles was not registered during an armed conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh in the fall and called Pashinyan’s controversial comment about the alleged failure of Russian-supplied missiles an “anecdote.”

On Monday, the Armenpress news agency reported, citing Pashinyan’s spokeswoman, that the prime minister came to the conclusion, after a conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, that he had received an incorrect report about the missiles.