Meeting initiated by President Sarkissian called off

Public Radio of Armenia
March 12 2021

Taking into account that the My Step and the Bright Armenia parliamentary factions have accepted the President’s invitation for a meeting, the Prosperous Armenia faction and the Homeland Salvation Movement proposed their agenda for the meeting and presented conditions, at this moment the format of the meeting around one table becomes infeasible, the President’s Office said in a statement.

President Armen Sarkissian will continue his efforts; he is ready to have separate meetings both with those invited, as well as with the MPs not included in the factions of the National Assembly, with the representatives of different extra-parliamentary political forces.

These meetings will give an opportunity to hear everyone’s views once again, to further clarify the positions, and to formulate a working agenda based on results.

The President of the Republic reaffirms his conviction that the only way to resolve differences is through negotiations and dialogue, and that everything must be done to keep the country from being shaken.

On Wednesday President Armen Sarkissian invited the Prime Minister, the leaders of the parliamentary factions, the leaders of the Homeland Salvation Movement for a meeting at the presidential residence on March 13.

HRW documents more evidence of torture and inhumane treatment of Armenian civilians by Azerbaijani forces

Public Radio of Armenia
March 12 2021

During last autumn’s six-week war between in Nagorno-Karabakh, as Azerbaijani forces took control of areas in and around the region, they rounded up local civilians. Most younger civilians had fled the hostilities. Those remaining, with few exceptions, were older people who did not want to abandon their homes.

Human Rights Watch (HRW)has documented several cases in which Azerbaijani forces used violence to detain civilians and subjected them to torture and inhuman and degrading conditions of detention. Two detainees died in Azerbaijani captivity; one of them, based on the evidence, was most likely the victim of an extrajudicial execution. Azerbaijani forces detained these civilians even though there was no evidence that they posed any security threat – they had no weapons and did not participate in the hostilities.

More than three months after the truce, Azerbaijan has returned a total of 69 Armenian Prisoners of War (POWs) and civilians. An Armenian foreign ministry representative told HRW that they believe more than a dozen civilians are still in Azerbaijani custody. Their families are increasingly distraught, especially in light of the abundance of graphic videos of abuse of prisoners circulating on social media, and the horrendous accounts of some of those who have been repatriated.

HRW reminds that under the Fourth Geneva Convention, which sets out protections for civilians in an international armed conflict, civilians are “protected persons.” The convention requires that anyone “taking no active part in the hostilities, […] shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, color, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.”

Also, as a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, Azerbaijan is bound by prohibitions on arbitrary detention as well as on torture and other degrading or inhuman treatment.

“The willful killing and ill-treatment of protected persons that we document constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law. Azerbaijani authorities should, without further delay, investigate the credible allegations regarding the unlawful detention of these civilians, their inhuman and degrading treatment, and the possible extrajudicial execution of a detainee, with a view to holding all perpetrators to account. They should also promptly free and repatriate any and all civilians who remain in their custody,” says Tanya Lokshina,  Associate Director, Europe and Central Asia Division.

For the full article click here.

HRW: Survivors of unlawful detention in Nagorno-Karabakh speak out about war crimes | Human Rights Watch

March 12 2021

New evidence of torture and inhumane treatment of civilians by Azerbaijani forces emerges

Published in: Open Democracy
Tanya Lokshina

During last autumn’s six-week war between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the ethnic-Armenian majority enclave Nagorno-Karabakh, as Azerbaijani forces took control of areas in and around the region, they rounded up local civilians. Most younger civilians had fled the hostilities. Those remaining, with few exceptions, were older people who did not want to abandon their homes.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) documented several cases in which Azerbaijani forces used violence to detain civilians and subjected them to torture and inhuman and degrading conditions of detention. Two detainees died in Azerbaijani captivity; one of them, based on the evidence, was most likely the victim of an extrajudicial execution. Azerbaijani forces detained these civilians even though there was no evidence that they posed any security threat – they had no weapons and did not participate in the hostilities.

Here are the stories of the two detainees who were killed, via accounts from their close relatives who were taken into custody with them and also subjected to torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. To document these crimes, we interviewed two people who had been held in captivity and their family members, examined photo and video evidence provided by both the families and Armenia’s Representative Office at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), reviewed medical documents, and spoke with lawyers representing the families.

Claims about Continued Captivity

The fighting began on 27 September and ended on 10 November, 2020, with a Russia-brokered peace agreement. The agreement provided, among other things, for “an exchange of prisoners of war and other detained persons and bodies of the dead.”

By the end of February, Armenia’s Representative Office at the ECHR had asked the court to intervene with the Azerbaijani authorities regarding 240 alleged prisoners of war (POWs) and civilian detainees. In approximately 90 percent of those cases, the office said, they had photo and/or video evidence confirming that these people were in Azerbaijani custody; in the rest of the cases, they relied on witness accounts. HRW is not in a position to determine the exact number of civilians detained by Azerbaijani forces. Two leading human rights lawyers working on the issue estimated that more than 10 percent of those detained by Azerbaijani forces were civilians.

More than three months after the truce, Azerbaijan has returned a total of 69 Armenian Prisoners of War (POWs) and civilians. An Armenian foreign ministry representative told HRW that they believe more than a dozen civilians are still in Azerbaijani custody. Their families are increasingly distraught, especially in light of the abundance of graphic videos of abuse of prisoners circulating on social media, and the horrendous accounts of some of those who have been repatriated.

International Law and the Treatment of Civilians During Armed Conflict

Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, which sets out protections for civilians in an international armed conflict such as that between Armenia and Azerbaijan, civilians are “protected persons.” The convention requires that anyone “taking no active part in the hostilities, […] shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.” During hostilities, it permits the internment or assigned residence of protected persons such as civilians where it is absolutely necessary for the security of the detaining power, or, as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia has put it, there are “serious and legitimate reasons” to think the interned persons may seriously prejudice the security of the detaining power. However, unlawful confinement of a protected person is a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions; in other words, treated as a war crime.

Also, as a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, Azerbaijan is bound by prohibitions on arbitrary detention as well as on torture and other degrading or inhuman treatment.

The wilful killing and ill-treatment of protected persons that we document below constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law. Azerbaijani authorities should, without further delay, investigate the credible allegations regarding the unlawful detention of these civilians, their inhuman and degrading treatment, and the possible extrajudicial execution of a detainee, with a view to holding all perpetrators to account. They should also promptly free and repatriate any and all civilians who remain in their custody.

Arega and Eduard

Arega Shahkeldyan, 72, is huddled in a large armchair by the window in a small rented apartment in Stepanakert, the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is slowly recovering from the war. Her family, like many others, fled to the city when Azerbaijani forces were advancing and ultimately regaining control over a large part of Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding regions.

The family are destitute, having lost their home and belongings. Their future is uncertain. But this is not what Arega is thinking of. She is mourning her husband of many years, Eduard. At the end of October, Azerbaijani forces detained both of them in their home in the village of Avetaranots, in Askeran district of Nagorno-Karabakh, and took them to a prison in Baku, Azerbaijan’s capital. Arega returned home after six weeks. Eduard, 79, died in prison under unclear circumstances.

Soon after hostilities began on 27 September, most residents left the village, but Arega and Eduard remained behind. Their children made several attempts to take them to Stepanakert, but Eduard flatly refused, arguing that Azerbaijani forces had never entered the village during the first war, 30 years ago, couldn’t possibly now, and that there was no way he would abandon his home and possessions.

On the morning of 28 October, their daughter Gokhar called them at 9 am to ask how the night had been and saying that she and her husband would come to the village later in the day to collect them, whether they wanted to leave or not – it was getting too dangerous. Eduard said everything was OK. But he had no idea that Azerbaijani forces had already entered the village. Fifteen minutes later, Gokhar’s husband, Vladik, called again to urge them to pack, but a stranger picked up the phone, speaking in Azeri. “Who are you?” Vladik asked in the same language. “I’m Azerbaijani and this is Azerbaijan,” the man said. The phone went dead.

“Their soldiers just ran into the house with those big automatic rifles, pointing their weapons at us, shouting, threatening,” Arega said. “I started crying, pleading with them not to hurt us, but they twisted my husband’s arms behind his back and led him out of the house. Then they pounced on me, I screamed, I tried to resist, I was telling them I won’t go anywhere, but they were yelling and pushing me, so they forced me out. I begged them to at least let me take some warm clothing, but they did not.”

Azerbaijani soldiers took Arega and Eduard to a house higher up in the village, whose owner had fled, and kept them there for the night with two other local residents: Sedrak, a nearly blind neighbor in his seventies, and Baghdasar, another neighbor about ten years younger. In the morning, the soldiers took the four detainees to another abandoned house in the village and put them in a shed. At night, Baghdasar managed to dislodge one of the stones from the shed’s wall and escaped through the hole. The other three didn’t have the strength to attempt it.

“We spent all night in that shed, with no food, no water. It got cold and I was shivering in my thin gown. My husband and Sedrak dozed off at some point, but I couldn’t sleep. I was too scared. I just sat there shivering and crying.”

The next day, the soldiers took the detainees to a logging site in the mountains nearby. “More soldiers were there and one of them punched Eduard several times and kicked him with booted feet, yelling that he had surely taken part in the war 30 years earlier and this was his punishment for killing Azerbaijani people back then.” Another soldier, hearing Arega scream as she watched her husband being beaten, tried to reassure her: “Don’t be afraid, Granny, it’s going to be OK. You’re old. No one will kill you. Just bear up – and after a while, you’ll be released.”

The detainees were forced to climb onto the back of a truck, on top of logs, and travelled for hours. No one told them where they were going. They were hungry, thirsty, cold, and frightened. Late that night, the truck arrived in Baku. Their captors locked them in a room in what seemed like a private house, without letting them use the bathroom or giving them any food or water.

In the morning, men in military uniforms blindfolded them, put them in a vehicle and took them to what their family later learned from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) was SIZO-1, the pretrial detention facility in the settlement of Kurdakhany in Baku. On arrival in the prison yard, the guards untied the blindfolds and allowed the detainees to drink water from a tap. They briefly saw another civilian from their village, Maxim Grigoryan, “a younger man” who later disappeared.

His family still has no information as to his fate and whereabouts, Gokhar sighs.

Those few minutes in the yard were the last time Arega saw her husband alive. Shortly after their arrival, the guards took Arega to a cell already occupied by another older woman, Azniv.

In early November Gokhar heard from the ICRC that her parents were in prison in Baku. When the hostilities ended, on 10 November, the family thought they would be sent back soon. On 5 December, a man called Vladik, Gokhar’s husband from an Azerbaijani number and said, in Azeri-accented Russian, that he would put Arega on the line. Gokhar snatched the phone: “Mamma, are you already here? They brought you back?” But her mother was crying and mumbling incoherently.

“Mamma, please pass the phone to Daddy!” Arega started sobbing uncontrollably, then the line went dead. Three minutes later, the unknown man called again from the same number saying, “Your mother was trying to tell you that your father died. I’m sorry.”

That morning, before the phone call, the guards had opened the door of Arega’s cell and told her that Eduard had died in his sleep and they were there to take her to his cell, so that she could view the body. She was in a state of shock and does not remember much about those awful moments, except that her husband’s face was black and blue. Sedrak and another cellmate also told her that Eduard had gone to sleep and did not wake.

Eduard’s family pointed out that he had asthma for many years and had to take medication three times a day. In detention, he no longer had access to his medications. “Mamma had a stroke years ago and suffers from high blood pressure, so she had to take prescription medicine every day,” Gokhar says. “But in prison, they would not give it to her, and no doctor examined her, despite her requests. It must have been the same for Daddy, and the stress of the captivity also took its toll.”

On 9 December, the Azerbaijani authorities returned Arega and several other detainees to Armenia. Eduard’s body was also supposed to be returned on the same flight. However, the next day when the family saw the body that had been on the flight, they realized it was another man, younger, with a scar on his face. At first, the Azerbaijani authorities denied they had sent the wrong body. Finally, on 28 December, they shipped Eduard’s body to Yerevan, Armenia’s capital, and the family buried him. On his death certificate, issued by the Armenian authorities following an autopsy, the cause of death is listed as blunt brain injury, brain swelling, and acute disorder of vital brain function.

Clutching her hands, Auntie Arega stared from beneath her black mourning kerchief. “At least, they finally returned his body,” she says. “And I now have a grave to visit.”

Sasha and Arsen

On 7 October, the women and children of the Gharakhanyan family fled Hadrut, a city in Nagorno-Karabakh. The Azerbaijani army was advancing, and it no longer felt safe to remain. But 71-year-old Sasha Gharakhanyan would not hear of leaving his home. Sasha’s 44-year-old son, Arsen, who had lived in Moscow for several years but came to visit his parents shortly before hostilities began, could not bear to leave his father all alone. So, he also stayed.

On 10 October, Arsen was in the center of Hadrut when he saw the first Azerbaijani soldiers in the city. He rushed home to collect his father, hoping there was still time for the two of them to flee. But when he entered the house, it was already full of Azerbaijani soldiers, at least 15 of them. His father watched helplessly as they pounced on Arsen, tied his hands behind his back, and led him away.

Arsen’s sister Marine had last spoken to her father and brother on 9 October. When their phones stopped working a day later, she and the rest of the family feared the worst. On 9 November, they had the first glimpse of hope: a video began circulating on social media with Azerbaijani soldiers forcing Sasha to kiss the Azeri flag and repeat “Karabakh – Azerbaijan.” At least he was alive. Ten days later, the ICRC told the family that their representatives had been able to locate and visit Sasha in a prison in Baku, where he was being held in a cell with five other civilians.

On 14 December, Azerbaijan returned Sasha to Armenia as part of a group of 44 POWs and civilians. He spent the next ten days in hospital. Sasha’s wrists and ankles were deeply scarred from having been tightly bound with wire. There were also scars on the back of his head where a soldier hit him several times with a rifle butt, and scars on his back from being poked with a metal rod. X-rays showed that one of his ribs on the left had been fractured and that he had a broken nose. Sasha was weak and disoriented and kept asking for his son. But there was no news of Arsen.

Once Sasha was discharged from hospital, his family took him to Stepanakert, where the six of them still share a tiny two-room apartment with one large bed and one sofa, temporary accommodation provided by the local authorities. On 6 January, after almost three months of having no information about Arsen’s fate, the family saw a video circulating on social media. It showed Azerbaijani soldiers forcing Arsen to say “Karabakh is Azerbaijan” and to call Nicol Pashinyan, Armenia’s Prime Minister, degrading names. Arsen looked worn out but he didn’t seem to be wounded or visibly hurt.

Sasha Garakhanyan speaking to Human Rights Watch. Stepanakert, February 2021. © 2021 Tanya Lokshina, Human Rights Watch

“The day that video suddenly popped up was actually my birthday,” says Aida, Arsen’s mother, her eyes swimming in tears. “It was such an amazing gift to learn that my son was alive. We began waiting for him to return, like his father did. We even bought him new clothes.” On 8 January, another video appeared on social media, with Azerbaijani soldiers mocking Arsen and ordering him to “say hello to Shusha” (‘Shushi’ in Armenian, a town taken by Azerbaijani forces in a decisive victory in early November). The second video only reinforced the family’s hopes.

On 13 January, in response to an Armenian government request, the ECHR asked Azerbaijan to provide information about Arsen’s fate and whereabouts. Five days later, in the course of the search for dead bodies in Hadrut region, with the mediation of Russian peacekeepers and the ICRC, Arsen’s body was found near the village of Aygestan. From the photos we were shown, the grave appeared to be fresh, and the body showed no obvious signs of decomposition. There were clear marks of gunshots through the forehead and chin. The conclusion of the Armenian medical examiners was that Arsen had been shot dead on 15 January, two days after the European Court raised his case with the Azerbaijani government.

Sasha is too weak to sit through our conversation. He leans back on top of the meticulously made bed, detailing what happened on 10 October; how the soldiers took him to the centre of Hadrut, pushed him, kicked him, poked him with something sharp, tied him up, and threw him into the back of a truck, “like a log”. He describes how they threw stones at his legs, how the wire that tied his legs cut through his skin, and how his captors pulled him up by his bound legs and secured them to a rack on the back of the truck.

Scarring on Sasha Garakhanyan’s ankle. Stepanakert, February 2021. © 2021 Tanya Lokshina, Human Rights Watch

The scarring on one of his ankles is horrendous, as if the wire had cut through to the bone. His right hand is still swollen, and he has difficulty moving it. He speaks in monotone, grudgingly, without looking up. His wife, sitting next to him, on the edge of the bed, cannot stop crying: “Why did they kill our son? He wasn’t fighting in the war. He was unarmed. He just stayed to watch over his father. So, it’s a war, so they rounded him up – but the war ended, and they still didn’t let him go. They abused him, they filmed him, they posted those videos… and then killed him. Why?”

?fbclid=IwAR1LJ7paSxczh6clHv-VxmL5KBz1z4JrLrq10Bo0f8XiBYB3zyY6loqaMbE

Prime Minister Pashinian Stages Own Coup Against Armenia’s Military

Jamestown Foundation
March 11 2021

Armenia’s military top brass has demanded that Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s government resign “for having brought the country to disaster.” Blaming Pashinian for overall incompetence and the recent lost war, the generals have nevertheless stopped short of attempting a coup d’état (see EDM, February 25, 26). Nor have they indulged in acts of military disobedience to the government. While sharing the civilian opposition’s views and goals, the generals have refrained from joining the protest movement thus far.

Pashinian, however, has lost no time in staging a political and personnel “coup” of his own against the military’s high command.

On March 10, Pashinian unilaterally dismissed the Armed Forces’ chief of the General Staff, Colonel General Onik Gasparian, notwithstanding President Armen Sarkissian’s refusal to co-sign the dismissal decree. The president referred the matter to the constitutional court on the same day.

Also on March 10, Pashinian brought his former protégé, Lieutenant General Artak Davtian, back from retirement to nominate him as chief of the General Staff. Davtian can legally be installed subject to President Sarkissian’s consent. Sarkissian has promptly objected, however (Arminfo, March 11). Lieutenant General Stepan Galstian is, therefore, tasked to be acting chief of the General Staff by order of Defense Minister Vagarshak Harutiunan. The latter is a recent Pashinian appointee, at odds with the active-duty generals (see below).

The position of first deputy chief of staff is also vacant since Pashinian dismissed Gasparian’s first deputy, Lieutenant General Tiran Khachatrian, on February 24. President Sarkissian, a hesitant personality, co-signed Khachatrian’s ouster before vacillating back to decline Gasparian’s removal. Both Gasparian and Khachatrian are moving to contest their dismissal by Pashinian in the Administrative Court. Their defense holds that they legally hold the positions of chief and first deputy chief of the General Staff pending a court decision (News.am, March 10, 11).

In a public statement on the same day, Gasparian contested Pashinian’s dismissal order as „anti-constitutional, yet another proof that the government’s resignation and pre-term parliamentary elections are the only way to overcome this crisis.” In an accompanying collective statement, “The Armed Forces’ high command adheres to General Gasparian’s declaration and confirms his assessment of the situation in the country” (Arminfo, March 10).

Notwithstanding their resentment, however, the generals remain thus far compliant with the principle of civilian control. Pashinian, safe in this knowledge and counting on this, staged a meeting at the Ministry of Defense on March 10 to present his controversial personnel changes to the assembled General Staff. The videotape immediately released by Pashinian’s office showed the top brass compactly standing at attention in front of the prime minister and listening to his presentation of the personnel changes without murmur. He added some perfunctory compliments to the military and even to Gasparian, who was absent. This scene was a successful public relations move typical of Pashinian. The public was led to believe that Pashinian had subdued his most redoubtable critics and was back in control (Armenpress, March 10).

Pashinian’s capricious manner of governing has wrought havoc on the military and security services’ commands during his almost three years as prime minister. His latest choice for chief of the General Staff, Davtian (see above), had already served in this post from May 2018 to June 2020. Pashinian picked him for that position at that time because Davtian was only a one-star general with relatively little authority and beholden to his benefactor. Davtian, however, had to resign after hosting a party with more than 100 guests in violation of coronavirus restrictions (Aravot, June 8, 2020). Davtian then headed Armenia’s Committee on Military Industry for only four months, until Pashinian released him without public explanation (ARKA, November 16, 2020). On March 9, 2021, Defense Minister Vagharshak Harutiunian appointed Davtian to a new position created for him as “senior officer for special assignments”; and one day later, Pashinian nominated Davtian as chief of the General Staff (see above).

Pashinian appointed the respected Gasparian as chief of the General Staff in June 2020 in the run-up to the war and promoted him from two-star to three-star general during the war. Pashinian overlooked Gasparian’s pre-war advice to do everything possible to avoid war or at least postpone it. Once the war started, Pashinian disregarded Gasparian’s recommendations (from the fourth day of the war onward) to avoid defeat by stopping the hostilities or to fire Iskander missiles in desperation. Gasparian deemed the armistice terms not as Pashinian’s “treason” (which most opposition parties pin on the prime minister) but as a lesser evil: the utter destruction of Armenia’s forces (Aravot, November 17, 2020).

Retaliating to the General Staff’s demand for Pashinian to resign, the latter dismissed Gasparian on February 25, nominated Davtian as replacement on March 10, and temporarily designated Galstian as acting chief of the General Staff on the same day (see above), Galstian being the fourth holder of this post during Pashinian’s prime-ministership thus far. He might become chief of staff instead of Davtian, given President Sarkissian’s resistance to Davtian’s nomination.

Pashinian appointed Lieutenant General (ret.) Vagharshak Harutiunian (see above) as senior military advisor to the prime minister in August 2020 (one month before the war’s start) and as defense minister on November 20, 2020 (ten days after the armistice). Harutiunian is alien in many ways to the General Staff’s personnel and therefore a potential lever on it for Pashinian. A Soviet-schooled officer, born in 1956 and a graduate of two naval academies before serving in the Ground Forces, Harutiunian represented Armenia in the headquarters of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Joint (Collective) Forces from 1992 to 1999, receiving his first and second star during that tenure without any known battlefield exploits. Harutiunian served as defense minister of Armenia for less than one year (1999–2000), falling politically out of favor with then-president Robert Kocharian, who stripped Harutiunian of his military rank. Harutiunian was out of the military until 2019, when he had his military rank restored in the context of Pashinian’s vendetta against Kocharian. Following the 44-day war, Harutiunian is liaising on a regular basis with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Shoigu, to plan a rebuilding of Armenia’s Armed Forces (see EDM, March 1).

Pashinian has also appointed and dismissed the heads of the National Security Service with dizzying frequency. The Service has had five chiefs one after the other during his premiership (May 2018 to date), including three consecutive chiefs during the 44-day war (September 27–November 19, 2020); the third of these, Armen Abazian, is the current incumbent.

Armenia’s current constitution makes it possible for Pashinian to play these personnel games. The constitution, amended in 2015, shifted major powers from the president to the prime minister’s office, tailor-made for then-president Serge Sarkissian to become prime minister when his second presidential term expired in 2018. Pashinian led his “velvet revolution” in 2018 to prevent Sarkissian’s move and has inherited those constitutional powers as prime minister. Under these provisions, Pashinian initiates the appointment and dismissal of key defense and security officials, requiring pro forma the state president’s co-signature. The cautious President Armen Sarkissian has acted compliantly thus far, but Pashinian’s mismanagement of the war has prompted the head of state to call for the prime minister’s resignation and seems to have changed their relationship fundamentally.


Armenian singer charms the jury at the French The Voice

Public Radio of Armenia

A young French singer of Armenian origin, Anaid saw the four armchairs turn around thanks to her cover of an Armenian song at the French The Voice, LCI reports.

She wanted to send a message of love and solidarity and she succeeded.

Anaid, 25, charmed the four coaches of The Voice with her interpretation of “Je suis une tomb” by Vincent Baguian, inspired by a traditional Armenian song that tells “the story of a shepherd at the top of his mountain who realizes that it does not belong to him any more,” as explained the young woman accompanied on stage by her father and her brother, also musicians.

“Music has no borders,” added the young woman. “It is this bridge between Armenia, the country of my roots and France, my country of birth, that I wanted to transmit,” said Anaid.

“I wanted to send a message of peace and hope, to say that we are in France but that we do not forget where we come from. It was important for me to get this message across in French so that as many people as possible can understand,”  she added.

Swedish top diplomat to visit Baku on March 15 to discuss OSCE role in Karabakh settlement

TASS, Russia
The sides are also expected to discuss issues of cooperation between the OSCE and Azerbaijan

STOCKHOLM, March 14. /TASS/. Swedish Foreign Minister and OSCE Chairperson-in-Office Ann Linde will visit Azerbaijan on March 15, the Swedish foreign ministry said on Sunday.

According to the ministry, Linde will meet with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov and Prime Minister Ali Asadov to discuss the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh and the OSCE’s role in the conflict settlement process.

The sides are also expected to discuss issues of cooperation between the OSCE and Azerbaijan. The Swedish top diplomat will also meet with representatives of civil society.

Apart from that, Linde will also visit Armenia on March 15-16.

“Travelling to Azerbaijan and Armenia in my role as OSCE Chairperson-in-Office. The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is high on the agenda on this important trip. The OSCE has a role to play in finding sustainable solutions to the challenges in the region,” she wrote on her Twitter account.

The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the highland region of Nagorno-Karabakh, a disputed territory that had been part of Azerbaijan before the Soviet Union break-up, but primarily populated by ethnic Armenians, broke out in February 1988 after the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region announced its withdrawal from the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic. In 1992-1994, tensions boiled over and exploded into large-scale military action for control over the enclave and seven adjacent territories after Azerbaijan lost control of them. Talks on the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement have been ongoing since 1992 under the OSCE Minsk Group, led by its three co-chairs – Russia, France and the United States.

Renewed clashes between Azerbaijan and Armenia erupted on September 27, with intense battles raging in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh. The area experienced flare-ups of violence in the summer of 2014, in April 2016 and this past July.

On November 9, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a joint statement on a complete ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh starting from November 10. Under the document, the Azerbaijani and Armenian sides stopped at the positions that they had held and Russian peacekeepers were deployed along the engagement line in Nagorno-Karabakh and along the Lachinsky corridor that connects Armenia with the enclave to exercise control of the ceasefire observance.

Baku ready to open communications between Azerbaijan and Armenia, says Aliyev

TASS, Russia
According to the Azerbaijani leader, opening of communications will be in the interests of the entire region, giving a fresh impetus to cooperation and opening new possibilities

BAKU, March 14. /TASS/. Baku is ready to open communications with Yerevan, which will be a starting point for putting an end to the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said on Sunday at a meeting with visiting OSCE Chairperson-in-Office and Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde.

“We already started the process of negotiations on the opening of communications between Armenia and Azerbaijan. That was part of the statement which was signed on November 10. Negotiations already had several rounds, different levels and I think that this particular issue can be a starting point for completely turning the page of war and leaving it to the history,” he was quoted as saying on the presidential website.

According to the Azerbaijani leader, opening of communications will be in the interests of the entire region, giving a fresh impetus to cooperation and opening new possibilities. “And it can bring after many other areas of potential cooperation. I already publicly spoke that Azerbaijan is ready for that,” he stressed, adding that the four months that have elapsed after the war “already demonstrate the will of both sides to turn the page and to concentrate on the future.”

Linde, in turn, said that the OSCE “would see if there is anything we can do to contribute to resolving conflict in the OSCE area” and stressed that in this context international law, human rights, humanitarian law, peace and security are of top priority for the OSCE.

Renewed clashes between Azerbaijan and Armenia erupted on September 27, with intense battles raging in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh. The area experienced flare-ups of violence in the summer of 2014, in April 2016 and this past July.

On November 9, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a joint statement on a complete ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh starting from November 10. Under the document, the Azerbaijani and Armenian sides stopped at the positions that they had held and Russian peacekeepers were deployed along the engagement line in Nagorno-Karabakh and along the Lachinsky corridor that connects Armenia with the enclave to exercise control of the ceasefire observance. Apart from that, a number of districts came over to Baku’s control.

On January 11, 2021, the three leaders met in Moscow to sign a joint statement, which, among other things, provided for the establishment of a working group at the level of deputy prime ministers to unblock all economic and transport ties in the region.

Armenia’s Post-War Depression

Feb 14 2021

Armenians suffered from a double shock last year, with COVID-19 and a devastating 44-day war with Azerbaijan – the deadliest conflict in 2020. The conflict killed thousands of people within a few weeks while the rest of the world was busy managing COVID’s challenges. Since 1994, Nagorno-Karabakh (N.K.) has been controlled by Armenia, but within a few weeks in 2020, Azerbaijan captured most of the region with unconditional support from Turkey. Azerbaijan’s advanced technology outgunned the Armenians, and a ceasefire was signed on November 9th, with Azerbaijan declaring victory. In Nagorno-Karabakh, ethnic Armenians in newly-captured areas have been forced to move out. Some burnt their homes before leaving.

Nagorno-Karabakh is in the Caucasus, between Europe and Asia. Historically, its population has been largely ethnic Armenian with a substantial Azeri minority. The region is covered with medieval Armenian churches. Since N.K. was part of Soviet Azerbaijan, it was considered part of Azerbaijan when it and Armenia declared independence from the Soviet Union in the 20th century. However, N.K.’s Armenian population never accepted this. The majority-Armenian population moved to declare independence and self-rule, which Azerbaijan strongly opposed, rejecting several peaceful demonstrations for self-determination in 1988. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, this conflict turned into all-out war and these ancient feuds erupted. When Armenian forces claimed victory in 1994, taking control of seven regions of Azerbaijan and five in Nagorno-Kharak, Russia mediated a ceasefire between the countries. Despite the ceasefire, tensions between the two have never cooled down. Skirmishes regularly break out.

The Armenian republic is now suffering the effects of the loss, and its people are feeling major national trauma and post-war depression.

Internally, Armenia’s government handled the war poorly in many different ways. The Azeris had prepared for war, investing in modernizing their military, while Armenia was confident after its 1994 victory and was under the impression that its military superiority would last forever. Azeri military expenses increased significantly in the last decade, thanks to the profits they gained from oil riches. In addition to the larger investiture of military spending, Azerbaijan modernized its military technology, purchasing resources like advanced military drones. When war between the two countries broke out again in September 2020, Azeri forces pushed 20 km into the region, first taking back additional regions under Armenian control beyond Nagorno Karabakh, then a portion of N.K. itself within a few weeks.

Although Armenia tried to fight back, it was nearly defenseless. Armenia prepared to fight a 20th-century war, while Azerbaijan prepared for the modern century. This was the first military conflict in the 21st century where drones played a decisive role, ensuring Azerbaijan’s victory and the collapse of Nagorno Karabakh’s defense, which was mostly built on Soviet technology and tactics from the ’80s.

Armenia’s diplomacy also failed. Turkey saw an opportunity and threw its military weight behind Azerbaijan, which took advantage of the unconditional support. In addition to modern technology, this alliance provided help with military strategy and tactics as used in N.A.T.O. On top of this, Turkey brought in a few thousand mercenaries from Syria, hardened in their fighting skills. No power stood with Armenians when they needed it most.

Finally, Armenia failed its people by creating a false sense of confidence that it was winning the war. The nation wasn’t prepared for a possible defeat. After the first few days, many military experts saw that victory clearly wasn’t within reach. But throughout the war, Armenian leadership fed its people the idea that it was winning, which misled the population. This, in turn, made the defeat even more traumatic. Hundreds of young people enlisted to fight for their country, and these men and women lost their lives when the government could have stopped the war at an earlier stage. The country, promised a win, now suffers an aggravated post-war depression.

Armenia lost because instead of facing reality, its leaders based their judgments on ideological, political, partisan, and personal considerations for over two decades. Armenian-American historian and diplomat Jurair Libaridian explained, “We lost because we refused to see the shifting balance of power, to accept that time was not on our side. We confused feeling good with thinking strategically.”

Armenian leadership should have been honest with its people to ease expectations and prevent war, damage, and lost lives. “Armenia lost a war that should have been avoided at all costs, a war that couldn’t have been won,” Libaridian said. “Another segment of Armenian people lost its ancestral homes and its collective life. Armenia lost a whole generation of young men. Armenia lost the human and financial capital invested in N.K. over many years. We have lost our self-confidence,” Libaridian concluded, “our optimism, and much of the progress that had been made. We may have even lost our faith in democracy. We are a traumatized people not fully ready to accept what happened, and why. We have lost one more slice of our independence and sovereignty.”

Externally, Turkey and Russia had their own motives and acted, not because they wanted to protect Azerbaijan or Armenia, but because they were gaining something from the war. Other countries that could have stopped the war did not come forward as expected. The U.S. was deep into its presidential election drama and facing Donald Trump’s last weeks in power. Europe was fragmented over many internal issues. Turkey’s strong presence in the European Union further limited Europe’s involvement. Even France, possibly Armenia’s closest ally, limited intervention to only a few declarations for peace. Iran, which Armenia saw as supporting their cause, came to welcome the restoration of Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity.

Turkey played a vital role in Azerbaijan’s victory, but the country hurt Armenia beyond providing Azerbaijan with military strength. Turkey’s involvement adds to a century of psychological trauma that Armenia has seen no justice for. One million Armenians were massacred under Ottoman rule, but Turkey has refused to admit to the Armenian genocide. Now, together with Russia, the country has established a joint monitoring center very close to the N.K. border. Many Armenians expected a more impartial monitoring system under the United Nations umbrella. Other bodies, especially the United Nations, should have monitored Turkey’s involvement in this war.

But no one heard Armenia’s cries. No international organizations, including the United Nations, made substantial effort to stop the war. There was no driving force on the U.N. Security Council strong enough to make those cries for help heard, and this paralysis says much about the Council’s priorities. Long after the fighting had broken out, United Nations Spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric released a statement “condemn[ing] the use of force and regret[ting] the loss of life and the toll on the civilian population.” Dujarric continued, “The Secretary-General strongly calls on the sides to immediately stop fighting, de-escalate tensions, and return to meaningful negotiations without delay,” adding that the U.N. chief would be speaking to both the Azeri president and the Armenian prime minister. However, not much was done after that.

Ironically, when conflict erupted in Ethiopia around the same time, the refugees received U.N. support, while none has been given to the N.K., months after the war.

Although the war was short-lived, there were many opportunities for the United Nations to step forth. The U.N. should have begun a process that ensured recognition of the conflict and provided help before it was too late. Instead, the organization remains uninvolved to this day.

In theory, Armenia could have mitigated its losses in one of the bloodiest wars of the last decade if it had prepared better for 21st-century warfare. However, this would have escalated the conflict into a deeper and more destructive war for both Armenia and Azerbaijan. This conflict needs mediation and its refugees require humanitarian aid.

Armenia has opportunities to create solutions, Jurair Libaridarian said. These include demanding Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s resignation, rejecting or amending the November 10th ceasefire agreement, and pushing harder for the international recognition of Nagorno Karabakh’s independence. It is difficult to see peace between these nations in the near future. There must be strong international intervention to mediate the countries’ relations.

MariaMané Akopyan
Mariamane has just recently joined the OWP as a Correspondent Writer. Mariamane believes that with the spread of knowledge, life can dramatically change for many and she is certain that with knowledge comes safety and peace. Mariamane has a special interest in woman’s rights and equality, as she is minoring in Women’s Studies at her university.

Armenian Ambassador briefs US students on Armenian Genocide, Artsakh War

Public Radio of Armenia
– Public Radio of Armenia

On March 11, H.E. Varuzhan Nersesyan, Ambassador of the Republic of Armenia to the USA, provided an online lecture for the students of Dickenson Law faculty of the Penn University in the framework of the course “Crimes against Humanity.”

Ambassador Nersesyan briefed the students about the Armenian Genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Turkey in 1915 and highlighted the importance of the international recognition as a means of prevention for future genocides.

In this context the Ambassador mentioned the denial policy by Turkey and recalled some of the documents dated back to the beginning of the 20th century indicating the Genocide committed against Armenians.

The Ambassador once again expressed his gratitude to the countries which recognized the Armenian Genocide and emphasized the importance of the resolutions passed by the US Congress in 2019.

During the lecture the Ambassador presented the challenges and the humanitarian crisis after the war unleashed by Azerbaijan against Artsakh. In this context he stressed the issue of Armenian prisoners of war and captured civilians and inhuman treatment depicted in numerous footages uploaded in social media.

The lecture continued in Q&A format.

Armenian military expert believes Azerbaijan getting prepared for war with Armenia – aysor.am – Hot news from Armenia

AYSOR, Armenia

Each drilling contains a message, military expert Karen Vrtanesyan told Aysor.am referring to the drills Azerbaijan will carry out March 15-18.
He said Azerbaijan usually conducts drills in midst or in late March.

“What it means – Azerbaijan continues conducting drills in the same way as previously. It shows that Azerbaijan does not consider the conflict with Armenians ended,” he said, adding that it is important to understand what “message” the drills contain.

“Each drill contains a message, even if it is not openly said, let’s not forget about their first goal – each drill is strengthening of the armed forces, increasing the skills. Here the important thing is that the enemy is strengthening its armed forces, especially in case when it does it jointly with Turkey. It is mutually agreed work,” the expert said, adding that naturally, it is rather worrying for Armenia.

“The key message we must conclude from Azerbaijan’s post-war actions is that for Azerbaijan the war with Armenia has not ended, they do not consider it an ended war, it is one of the phases for them. It means that at a convenient moment Azerbaijan may apply to adventure like last year,” Vrtanesyan said.

He stressed that the authorities of Armenia are very much trying to persuade the population that the war has ended and it is time to think about peace, while the reality is not as bright.

“Azerbaijan is getting prepared to war,” the expert said, hailing the initiative of the Armenian side to conduct drills too.

He stressed that it is important for the drills to be effective and not turn into a PR action which is in the first place for our authorities.

Vrtanesyan also stressed that Armenian statehood faces serious threats.