Coronavirus: Armenian Doctors Fuel Fake News

Institute for War and Peace Reporting – UK
Aug 6 2020

Disinformation – sometimes spread by medical experts – has become a serious public health threat.
By Gayane Mkrtchyan

Anahit Martirosyan recently recovered from coronavirus. But the 48-year-old, who lives in the city of Echmiadzin in western Armenia, did not actually believe that the virus was even real until she became infected herself.  

“I went out without a face mask and I thought that the problem did not exist in reality,” she said. “I believed officials and doctors who were, and still are, agitating against wearing face masks and lockdown measures, on the grounds that Covid-19 is a myth. I didn’t know that doctors could also spread disinformation.”

Martirosyan ended up developing severe bilateral pneumonia.

She was just one of thousands of Armenians who have fallen victim to fake news stories that spread about Covid-19. Disinformation and unverified facts have become a serious danger to public health.

These false narratives also come from people seen as having expertise on the subject.

Marina Khachatryan, a neurosurgeon and former member of the Yerevan Council of Elders who now heads the Healthy Society NGO, initially claimed that the coronavirus was a part of a conspiracy led by Microsoft founder Bill Gates and later linked it to the 5G system.

In May, Khachatryan organised a Yerevan march to identify 5G stations that had apparently been secretly installed during quarantine. All three Armenian telecoms operators subsequently issued a statement claiming that there was no 5G network in Armenia.

In June, she initiated an online petition against compulsory vaccination.

“The vaccine will be deadly,” Khachatryan said. “Soon, according to my information, the minister of health will present a draft law on compulsory vaccination.”

The head of local NGO the Paracelius Medical Center Nune Nersisyan also openly questions the danger of the virus.

“I don’t wear a mask, I only advise infected people to wear it,” she said. “Masks cause allergies, cardiovascular problems, eczema, rashes, the cases of fungal diseases have increased. I want to understand whether they are trying to protect people with these masks or increase the rate of incidence?”

Nune Bakunts, deputy director of the ministry of health’s National Centre of Disease Control and Prevention, urged the public to listen to official sources of information rather than these supposedly alternative theories. 

“The means to fight the disease have already been proven,” he said. “Just because someone does not believe it, doesn’t mean that the virus will just disappear.”

Bakunts said it was hard to believe that some doctors were spreading doubts about key regulations meant to contain the virus.

“Those people took the Hippocratic Oath and I feel sorry for the doctors who allow themselves to question whether to wear a mask or not,” he said. “They are not only campaigning against the measures taken by the health ministry, but are also confusing others.”

The Armenian media.am website publishes weekly digests on Covid-19, debunking fake news and disinformation. According to its fact-checker Arshaluys Barseghyan, fake news could usually be traced back to a Russian source.

He added that narratives had evolved as the crisis continued. Those who disseminated fake news about Covid-19 at first used to say that it was a lie; now they say that the virus exists but is not dangerous.

“Then they came after masks and now started a campaign against vaccination,” Barseghyan continued. “When the ministry of health said that they were negotiating with different companies, they were spreading rumours about its threats. For example, that the vaccine developed by Moderna was untested and lethal. When the minister Arsen Torosyan recently called for restricting lockdown measures, they explicitly called for the opposite.”

Information security expert Samvel Martirosyan argued that it was essential to regularly supply the public with official information.

“The information about the dangers of Covid-19 provided daily by the ministry of health is inconsistent,” he continued. “The same with the WHO, sometimes it changes its position on conceptual issues twice a day. This creates a fertile ground for all kinds of conspiracy theories, doubts and alternative opinions. The only solution to this is a media-literate society.”

He said that manipulative information around Covid-19 was being used as a political tool and created additional layers of danger.

“Fake news is spread by people who do it deliberately in pursuit of specific political goals,” he concluded.

Barseghyan agreed that the phenomenon was fuelled by ake news was spread by people who had their own agenda and intend to target a specific audience.

“They refer to unsubstantiated sources and spread conspiracy theories, which seed fear and controversy. Fake news is a lie that always hides something,” he said.

While this process had begun on social networks, it had gradually spread to television, for example in stories featured on ArmNews, Kentron and TV5 channels.

News anchor Abraham Gasparyan, who has his own show at ArmNews TV and also heads its news and analytical programmes department, said the broadcaster had the duty to provide an alternative source of information.

“We allow for free speech in its primary form, but we also pursue our own policy, which supposedly cannot be even a little opposed to official information,” he said. “The whole country is talking about the decisions of the commandant’s [deputy prime minister Tigran Avinyan] office, which we also broadcast. But does the country really have no right to hear a different opinion that would challenge the official position? Of course it does.

“Our guests have the right to freely express their opinions, the media should not suppress freedom of speech, and ArmNews is a platform for differing opinions.”

He said that he had invited guests on his show who talked about their belief that 5G and coronavirus were connected, for instance.

“In my TV programme, I am trying to show that there is another opinion, which we analyse and present to the public. It means that we discuss everything at the analytical level,” he continued.

However, others believe that almost every media outlet in Armenia plays a political role.

Lawmaker Gayane Abrahamyan said that fake news was being spread for purely political purposes in an attempt to discredit the current government. The situation had deteriorated since the Velvet Revolution, she continued, since the majority of the media was still controlled or owned by former officials or oligarchs.

“The messages about Covid-19 are intended to influence public behaviour and mainly come from the opposition space,” she said. “Their goal is to… blame the government for its failure.”

On June 16, the Armenian parliament adopted a draft audiovisual media law, largely in response to Covid-19, designed to regulate the activities of television and radio companies.

Its co-author, lawmaker Vahagn Tevosyan, stated during the debates that this was an attempt to introduce a model in which freedom of speech will not be affected.

Legislation was vital, he said, “because you can’t just say to the public that Covid-19 is a lie and you should not wear masks.”

Ashot Melikyan, a chairman of the Committee to Protect Freedom of _expression_, said that more oversight was needed.

“Everything is so politicised, the media is so polarised and Armenia is so small that everyone knows from which camp this or that media outlet is nourished,” he said. “The person expressing the opinion must support it with facts. If a person makes judgments with reference to facts, then, yes, it is his right and no one should suppress his freedom of _expression_.

“But it is necessary to oblige the media to involve the official or opposite opinion in such TV shows. When the law comes into force, the regulatory agency will have the right to intervene.”

Proceedings launched against Armenian health minister

Panorama, Armenia
Aug 6 2020

The Corruption Prevention Commission of Armenia has initiated proceedings against Minister of Health Arsen Torosyan, on the basis of an apparent conflict of interest; Haykuhi Harutyunyan, the chairperson of the commission, confirmed to News.am.

A post of data.hetq.am served as a basis for the proceedings.

Accordingly, the Corruption Prevention Commission was informed that the Ministry of Health had signed service contracts with a company whose director is Vardanush Tevanyan, the wife of Torosyan.

Under these contracts, the company was obligated to provide hospital services, e-health spending reimbursement and computed tomography.

Reacting to the proceedings, Ministry of Health spokeswoman Alina Nikoghosyan said that the minister had repeatedly addressed the issue much discussed in the media before.

“We do not see a real conflict of interest here, as he or his family are not members of the company and have not received any other property improvements due to the contracts signed with the ministry,” she said in a Facebook post.

“These contracts are not subsidies or donations to organizations, but they are contracts for the provision of state-funded medical services, under which many eligible citizens of Armenia receive medical services,” the spokeswoman wrote, adding the minister or his representative will present their arguments to the commission if needed.

Armenian fighter jets carrying out training flights

Public Radio of Armenia
Aug 6 2020

Armenian embassy in Kuwait: Azerbaijan continues to recruit terrorists in Syria

News.am, Armenia
Aug 6 2020

14:53, 06.08.2020

The Kuwaiti website al-seyassah.com published a statement by the Armenian Embassy in Kuwait about the July clashes on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

The statement notes that Azerbaijan continues to spread misinformation about the facts of violation of the ceasefire regime on the international border between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.

During the Tavush events, Azerbaijan fired at civilians and threatened to destroy civilian infrastructures, used Hermes-900 drones and other types of UAVs, which the Armenian side effectively destroyed, regionmonitor reported.

Azerbaijan continues to recruit and send terrorists from Syria to the Caucasus against the peaceful Armenian population, the embassy noted adding that Azerbaijan and its ally Turkey in late July began large-scale military drills along the borders of Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia, threatening the security of not only Armenia, but the entire region.

The Azerbaijani aggression is a gross violation of the fundamental principles of international law, taking into account also the call of the UN Secretary-General for an immediate ceasefire throughout the world amid the COVID19 pandemic, the statement said.

The Armenian Embassy also referred to the speech of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev as the latter tried to convince his people that the Karabakh conflict can be resolved by military means, and peace talks are useless.

The current leadership of Azerbaijan has publicly expressed its ambitions regarding the territory of present Armenia, including the Syunik province and the capital Yerevan, the statement noted and added that this is funny.

The anti-Armenian policy has become the cornerstone of the state of Azerbaijan, the statement concluded.

Turkish Press: ANALYSIS – Why is Armenian diaspora resorting to aggression again?

Anadolu Agency, Turkey
Aug 6 2020
ANALYSIS – Why is Armenian diaspora resorting to aggression again?

Dr. Cavid Veliev   | 06.08.2020

The writer works at the Baku-based think-tank Center for International Relations Analysis.

BAKU 

The skirmishes in Tovuz, on the international border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, led to confrontations between representatives of the diasporas of the two states overseas. Radical attitudes and attacks by the representatives of Armenians were particularly noticeable. The first large-scale attack happened in Los Angeles, the United States, also known as the capital of the Armenian diaspora with 500,000 Armenian residents. A large group of Armenians attacked and injured a much smaller group of Azerbaijanis in Los Angeles on July 21, the latter having gathered to peacefully protest the recent Armenian aggression on the border with Azerbaijan. According to the Los Angeles Police Department, detectives are investigating the assaults as a hate crime. Eric Garcetti, the mayor of Los Angeles, sent a letter to Consul General of Azerbaijan in Los Angeles Nasimi Aghayev and condemned the assaults.

This incident was followed by a number of provocations staged against representatives of the Azerbaijani diaspora and diplomatic missions in Poland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Georgia, the Ukraine and Russia. On July 30, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan dismissed 13 employees of the Office of the Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs. According to the pro-Pashinyan news portal lragir.am, these dismissals were due to the latest string of assaults in the US and Europe.

After these events, experts began to discuss the reasons behind what seems to be a rebirth of radicalization within the Armenian diaspora and the resulting attacks. The debate revolves around three particular reasons: first, the radical ideology that continues to be fed into the perceptions of Armenian youth; second, the shattering of the image of Armenia as a “victimized” nation; and third, the Armenian government’s relations with the diaspora.

The spread of radical ideology in the Armenian diaspora passed through three stages. The first period started at the beginning of the 20th century. According to historical documents, during meetings in Yerevan in September and October 1919, the Armenian political party Tashnak decided to assassinate politicians, including Armenians from Turkey and Azerbaijan, as proposed by Armenian-American Shahan Natalie (born in the Ottoman Empire as Hagop der Hagopyan). As a result of this meeting, an assassination team was created, led by Shahan Natalie, Armen Garo, and Aron Sachaklian. The organization established for this purpose was named Nemesis. The Nemesis terror organization assassinated Azerbaijani Prime Minister Fetali Han Hoyski on June 19, 1920 in Tbilisi. Later, Minister of Internal Affairs of Azerbaijan Behbud Khan Javanshir was assassinated on July 18, 1921 in Istanbul by Nemesis member Misak Torlakian, who then fled to the United States and lived there to the end of his life.

The second period of the spread of radical ideology in the Armenian diaspora began in 1975. In this year, the diaspora established two organizations: The Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia (ASALA) and the Justice Commandos of the Armenian Genocide (JCAG), both of which adopted terrorism against civilians as a strategy. Between 1975 and 1983, Armenian terrorist organizations perpetrated 161 bomb attacks, 77 people were killed as a result of the attacks perpetrated by these organizations, among them 31 Turkish diplomats. At that time, ASALA and JCAG were specified as terrorist groups by the United States. However, many Armenian intellectuals continued to celebrate the activities of ASALA and JCAG in their writings and hailed these terrorists as heroes.

Moreover, Armenian diaspora organizations continue to idealize these two organizations to Armenian youth as an exemplar. For example, on July 26, 2020 a number of Armenian churches organized religious ceremonies to commemorate the five “heroes” who gave their lives for the Armenian people. On July 27, an Armenian diaspora newspaper published in Los Angeles remembered the five Lisbon “heroes” who attacked the Turkish embassy in Lisbon in 1983. These so-called heroes killed two civilians, including the wife of a Turkish diplomat and a Portuguese police officer. Through such commemorations, Armenian youth are encouraged to emulate the ideology and actions of the terrorists.

The third period in the rebirth of radical ideology in the Armenian diaspora started in 1988 during the occupation of Azerbaijan’s territories by Armenia. In 1987, ASALA members dissolved their terrorist organization and came to Armenia, where they were welcomed as heroes. Upon their return, ASALA members also took an active part in the occupation of Azerbaijani territories by acting in cahoots with other terror organizations. Armenian terrorist groups not only operated in the occupied territories, but also attacked buses, metro stations, and other civilian locations in Baku and other cities of Azerbaijan, causing many deaths and injuries.

The second reason for the rebirth of radicalization in the Armenian diaspora today has to do with its declining influence. During the period 1988–1994, when Armenia occupied Azerbaijani lands, the Armenian diaspora worked to legitimize the occupation in the eyes of international public opinion. On Jan. 19-20, 1990, for example, the Soviet Union invaded Baku and attacked demonstrators demanding the resolution of certain social and human rights issues. Through misrepresentation by the Armenian diaspora, some newspapers in the West tried to form a lobby against Azerbaijan and portrayed the Soviet attacks as a “suppression of Islamists in Baku”. In 1992, at a time when Armenia continued to occupy Azerbaijan’s territories and just after the Khojaly genocide, the US Congress, under the influence of the Armenian diaspora, adopted “Section 907” against Azerbaijan. Ironically, Section 907 demanded that Azerbaijan stop the “aggression” against Armenia. A few months after the adoption of Section 907, the UN Security Council adopted four resolutions (822, 853, 874, 884) demanding that Armenia withdraw its forces from the occupied territories of Azerbaijan. These episodes from history highlight that during the 1990s, the Armenian diaspora formed a monopoly over the narrative against Azerbaijan.

However, after the 2000s, the Armenian diaspora started to lose its influence in this field. The first reason was related to the increasing activism on the part of Azerbaijan’s own diaspora. Stronger institutionalization and mobilization of Azerbaijani diaspora contributed greatly to the recognition of the Khojaly massacre as a genocide committed by Armenia by more than 10 countries in the world and nearly 20 states in the US. What’s more, despite the efforts of the Armenian diaspora to portray Azerbaijan as an aggressor, the international community began to recognize that Azerbaijani lands are in fact occupied by Armenia.

The third and final reason for the resurgence of radicalization relates to a policy pursued by the Armenian government. Pashinyan, who desires to enlist the support of the diaspora in Armenia’s domestic policy struggle, also wants to use the diaspora as a foreign policy tool and therefore wants to please the diaspora by adopting a populist and nationalist policy. During his first visit to the US, Pashinyan went to Los Angeles and made a speech to the Armenian diaspora there, in which he thanked them for supporting him during the “Velvet Revolution”. Subsequently, Pashinyan also asked them to support his government economically. In addition, Armenia’s Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan, who was appointed by Pashinyan, threatened Azerbaijan, during a speech to the Armenian diaspora in New York, with occupying new territories. Thus, speeches by officials of the new government are also greatly contributing to the rebirth of radical attitudes among the Armenian diaspora.

The Armenian government supports this reemerging radicality in the Armenian diaspora as the latter is no longer able to perform its assigned roles through conventional lobbying activities. It has also become largely evident that the Armenian diaspora is also no longer able to legitimize the occupation of Azerbaijan’s territories or sell Armenia as a “victim”. As a result, the diaspora, in its desperation, has started to adopt radical methods to make its voice heard once again.

* Opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Anadolu Agency.

Armenian woman stopped at Munich airport in Germany after husband’s bones found in bag

Deutsche Welle, Germany
Aug 6 2020

A woman traveling from Greece said she wanted to return her husband’s remains to his native Armenia. Authorities later deemed the transfer of the bones as lawful.

Authorities at Munich airport in Germany detained a 74-year-old Armenian woman after human bones were found in her luggage, German federal police said Tuesday.

Airport officials found the humans remains after examining the contents of a wooden box in the woman’s luggage. They then called in customs officers, a doctor and a public prosecutor for further questioning.

Read more: Malaysian officials find 5,255 turtles packed in suitcases

Police interrogations revealed that the woman was attempting to fly the bones of her deceased husband from her home in Greece to be laid to rest in their native Armenia, with flight stopovers in Munich and Kyiv before reaching the destination. The woman was accompanied by her 52-year-old daughter.

Documents indicated that the woman’s husband had died in 2008 and was buried near their home in Thessaloniki.

Federal authorities determined that the transfer of human remains was lawful. The public prosecutor also found no grounds for a criminal investigation.

Read more: German sniffer dog Luke finds €745,000 in cash

The mother and daughter were permitted to continue on their journey, taking the bones with them.

Mexico lawmakers call Armenia, Azerbaijan for peace

News.am, Armenia
Aug 6 2020

12:48, 06.08.2020
                  

Commissioner for diaspora: Very large number of people wish to come to Armenia from Lebanon

News.am, Armenia
Aug 6 2020

14:10, 06.08.2020

YEREVAN. – On Saturday I will leave for Lebanon—Beirut, and I will get acquainted with the situation much more realistically on the spot. Zareh Sinanyan, High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs of Armenia, on Thursday said this in a conversation with journalists, referring to the issue of Armenians in Lebanon wishing to come to Armenia after Tuesday’s powerful and deadly explosion in Beirut.

“At the moment, it seems that the number of people who want to come to Armenia is really very large, but there is no objective, numerical calculation of those people, which makes our job a little more difficult,” Sinanyan said.

According to him, there is an actual problem of coming to Armenia for people who do not have Armenian citizenship, or residency status in Armenia. “We must find a way for them, too, to be able to come to the homeland; it is not an absolute legal right, but it is an absolute moral right for any Armenian,” the diaspora commissioner added.

When asked how many people from Lebanon have applied to come to Armenia at the moment, Sinanyan responded that there are direct applicants, but there are more indirect applicants, whose final “picture” will be clear after his visit to Beirut.

And to the question how the residency issues of the Armenians who came to Armenia from Lebanon will be resolved, Sinanyan said: “No Armenian coming to Armenia shall be left without a place to live; so, we are working in that direction.”

https://news.am/eng/news/595507.html

House in Armenian border village destroyed in Azerbaijani shelling to be built from scratch

Panorama, Armenia
Aug 6 2020

A house in the border village of Chinari of Armenia’s Tavush Province completely destroyed in Azerbaijani shelling in July will be built from scratch, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan told a cabinet meeting on Thursday.

Another destroyed house in the village of Nerkin Karmiraghbyur, where no one lives, will be turned into a park, he added.

“We will buy the area from the owner and donate it to the village,” the prime minister said.

According to preliminary assessments, a total of 302,618,000 drams are needed to repair the damages inflicted to the border villages by the Azerbaijani shelling, of which 25,000,000 drams were already allocated by the Armenian government during one of its previous meetings, Armenian Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure Suren Papikyan said.

According to the minister, the envisaged funds of 277, 618,000 drams will be directed to the restoration works in the villages. 


Armenia restricts foreign channels

Broadband TV News
Aug 6 2020

Armenia’s president Armen Sargsyan has signed off a law that restricts the terrestrial distribution of foreign TV channels.

Interfax reports that the restrictions also apply to Russian channels.

It adds that the law legislation, entitled On Audiovisual Media, was passed by the Armenian parliament and envisages that foreign channels will only be able to be distributed without a licence on a public multiplex on the basis of an interstate agreement between Armenia and another country.