Russia Seeks Monitoring Deal to Oversee Armenia-Azeri Truce

Bloomberg
Oct 19 2020

Nagorno-Karabakh: Warring sides trade blame over clashes

Deutsche Welle, Germany
Oct 19 2020

Armenia and Azerbaijan have accused each other of violating a new “humanitarian cease-fire” in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh. The resumption of hostilities came just hours after the second truce took effect.

Armenia and Azerbaijan on Sunday struggled for a second time to halt fierce fighting over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh, accusing each other of violating a new cease-fire.

Armenian officials accused the Azeri forces of using artillery and missiles, just hours after a truce went into effect at midnight local time (2000 UTC/GMT Saturday).

“Once again violating the humanitarian cease-fire, the enemy fired artillery shells in the northern direction from 00:04 to 02:45, and fired rockets in the southern direction from 02:20 to 02:45,” said Armenia’s Defense Ministry spokeswoman Shushan Stepanyan.


Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry, meanwhile, said Armenian forces had “grossly violated another agreement”, accusing them of firing artillery and mortar shells in various directions and of launching early morning attacks along the frontline.

Officials in Nagorno-Karabakh said Azeri forces had launched an attack on the enclave’s military positions and there were casualties and wounded on both sides.

Previously, the two countries issued a joint statement confirming the truce, saying the “decision was taken following the statement of the presidents of the French Republic, the Russian Federation and the United States of America, representing the co-chair countries of the OSCE Minsk Group.”

At least 710 people have died in the disputed region since fighting resumed between Azeri and Armenian forces on September 27. It is the bloodiest conflict in the area since a war from 1991-1994.

A Russian-brokered suspension of hostilities was agreed last Saturday to allow the sides to swap detainees and the bodies of those killed. But the truce broke down quickly as both sides continued carrying out attacks while accusing each other of violating the deal. 

Read more: EU fails to act on Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan

On Saturday, Azerbaijani officials said an Armenian missile struck a residential district in Ganja, Azerbaijan’s second-largest city, leveling homes and killing 13 civilians with 50 more wounded. 

The European Union, Russia and the US have all called for the fighting to stop and for peace talks to be mediated by France, Russia and the United States.

Representatives from the three countries co-chair the so-called Minsk Group, which was created in 1992 to encourage a negotiated resolution to a then-full blown war that killed at least 30,000 people.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called both his counterparts in Armenia and Azerbaijan before the announcement Saturday and said both sides need to “strictly follow” last week’s cease-fire deal, Russia’s Foreign Ministry said. 

French President Emmanuel Macron released a statement shortly after the announcement, calling for the cease-fire to be “unconditional and strictly observed by both parties.”

Read more: Nagorno-Karabakh’s record growth in ruins amid conflict and pandemic

Nagorno-Karabakh is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, but it is populated and governed by ethnic Armenians after it was seized during the war in the early 1990s.

Azerbaijan has insisted it has the right to reclaim the region by force, claiming the Minsk Group’s efforts have failed to bring progress after three decades. 


https://www.dw.com/en/nagorno-karabakh-warring-sides-trade-blame-over-clashes/a-55312086?fbclid=IwAR2SdIailFYhaF4dF9czDZx0AFCk5WT-Qu77dwxq_b-LJZj5dpPgm3JfPVU

Danger of Russian-Turkish conflict grows as Armenian-Azeri ceasefire fails

WSWS -World Socialist Web Site
Oct 19 2020

Three weeks into a bloody war between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the Caucasus, the danger is mounting that the conflict could trigger a broader regional and indeed global war.

Casualties are rapidly rising as artillery and missile strikes rain down on civilian and military targets on both sides. Yesterday, Armenian authorities in the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh enclave increased their confirmed military losses to 710 deaths. However, neither side has issued precise figures on their total military and civilian losses, while claiming that they have killed thousands of their opponents’ soldiers and civilians.

Fighting continued after a first truce negotiated a week ago by Russia, and then a new truce set to enter into effect at midnight Sunday, brokered by the so-called Minsk Group on the Karabakh conflict led by the United States, Russia and France. This latest ceasefire was presented as a “humanitarian” truce to allow an exchange of bodies and prisoners of war.

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Vladimir Putin [Credit: st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 1.5rem;line-height:1.5;font-size:1.25rem;max-width:34em”>Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called his Armenian and Azeri counterparts before the truce was announced to call upon both to adhere to the earlier ceasefire. The Elysée presidential palace in France also called on both sides to “strictly” respect the truce and said that France, which has a substantial Armenian population, would closely follow events.

US officials, who had until now maintained a deafening silence on the Armenian-Azeri war, also made statements last week suggesting support for a truce. “We’re hopeful that the Armenians will be able to defend against what the Azerbaijanis are doing,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told WBS radio in Atlanta on Thursday.

Saying he wanted the two sides to “get the ceasefire right,” Pompeo blamed Turkey for the escalation: “We now have the Turks, who have stepped in and provided resources to Azerbaijan, increasing the risk, increasing the firepower that’s taking place in this historic fight over this place called Nagorno-Karabakh.” Pompeo claimed Washington does not want “third-party countries coming in to lend their firepower to what is already a powder keg of a situation.”

US Democratic Party presidential candidate Joe Biden also criticized Ankara’s support for the ethnic-Turkic Azeris, stating, “Turkey’s provision of arms to Azerbaijan and bellicose rhetoric encouraging a military solution are irresponsible.”

Foreword to the German edition of David North’s Quarter Century of War
Johannes Stern, 5 October 2020

After three decades of US-led wars, the outbreak of a third world war, which would be fought with nuclear weapons, is an imminent and concrete danger.

On Sunday, however, Armenian and Azeri officials denounced each other for violating the truce. After Armenian Defense Ministry spokeswoman Shushan Stepanyan blamed Azeri forces for artillery and rocket attacks, the Azeri Defense Ministry accused Armenian forces of launching an early-morning artillery and mortar barrage. On Saturday, Armenian forces had fired missiles on Ganja, Azerbaijan’s second-largest city, leaving 13 civilians dead, including two children, and dozens wounded.

There are signs that Azeri forces have, for now, the upper hand. US military analyst Rob Lee told Al Jazeera that high-altitude Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drones have “dramatically” affected Armenian forces. Lee said: “TB2s initially targeted air defence systems. The ones we’ve seen destroyed are from the 1980s. I think the radars are struggling to pick up these small [drones]. Then, the TB2s started going after tanks, artillery and now, because they’ve been going through a succession of targets of priority, we see them targeting squads of soldiers.”

Azerbaijan is buying drones from Turkey, which has used them extensively in the civil wars triggered by decade-long NATO imperialist interventions in both Libya and Syria. Fuad Shahbaz, an official at the Centre for Strategic Communications think-tank in Baku, told Al Jazeera, “We have seen Bayraktar drones actively used in Syria and Libya by the Turkish air force against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and General Khalifa Haftar’s Army in Libya.”

A large-scale Azeri ground invasion, Al Jazeera noted, would still face “well-fortified [Armenian] defensive positions occupying high ground in mountainous territory.” However, Lee added, “TB2s are just sitting overhead and waiting for targets of opportunity. Ultimately, Armenians don’t have a good plan for destroying them. They have to do something or Azerbaijan will keep hitting them.”

The bloody conflict over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh enclave first erupted in the lead-up to the Stalinist bureaucracy’s dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. None of the subsequent negotiations proved able to resolve the 1988-1994 conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which led to over 30,000 dead and 1 million displaced. Armenian forces ended up in control of Nagorno-Karabakh and several surrounding Azeri territories connecting Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia, leading to permanent and insoluble conflicts between the two former Soviet republics.

This conflict, which shows the inviability and reactionary character of the nation-state system, has now become deeply enmeshed with the conflicts provoked by the decades of imperialist wars led by Washington in the Middle East and Central Asia since the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

In particular, it comes amid renewed US war threats against Iran and growing proxy wars between Turkey and Russia. In Syria, Russia and Iran have backed President Bashar al-Assad’s regime against NATO-backed Islamist militias resupplied from Turkey, while Russia and Turkey have backed opposed factions in Libya.

As the Armenian-Azeri war drags on, the risk that it could escalate into a direct conflict between the major powers rises. While Ankara has openly called for Azerbaijan to expel Armenians from the Karabakh, Moscow, which has an alliance and troops stationed in Armenia, has not yet intervened.

While Moscow still calls for peace and de-escalation, there are growing signs that it is considering direct involvement. On October 16, Russia held military exercises in the Caspian Sea, which borders both Azerbaijan and Iran, involving four warships armed with cruise missiles, two escort ships, warplanes and troops. The Russian Defense Ministry stated that the exercise did “not restrict the economic activity of the Caspian littoral states.”

There is undoubtedly concern in Moscow and Tehran about reports of Al Qaeda-linked Islamist fighters deploying to Azerbaijan, which borders both Russia and Iran. These fighters could be used to inflame Turkic-separatist sentiment in Iran or revive civil wars in nearby Muslim-majority areas of Russia, like Chechnya or Dagestan, that erupted after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

In Iran, Mashregh News, close to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, warned that Turkish private security firms and Syrian Islamist militias are sending fighters to Azerbaijan. It wrote that if the Karabakh “is captured by [Azeri President Ilham] Aliyev’s forces and the terrorists sent by Erdoğan, there will be a serious threat to Iran in terms of national security and territorial integrity.”

As the Russian drills began in the Caspian Sea, Russia’s Kommersant published detailed allegations of Turkish involvement. It wrote that 600 Turkish troops including drone pilots stayed behind in Azerbaijan after Turkish-Azeri military exercises in July-August. Relying apparently on access to Georgian authorities’ records of Turkish flights through their airspace to Azerbaijan, Kommersant identified the aircraft type and flight numbers of alleged Turkish flights of ammunition and troops to Azerbaijan on September 4, 18, 30 and October 1, 3 and 9.

It also alleged that Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar and army chief of staff General Ümit Dündar traveled to Azerbaijan on September 28-30 and “are in charge on the ground of overall operational leadership on the Karabakh front.”

“Turkish representatives are recruiting mercenaries to participate in fighting in the Karabakh on the Azeri side among Islamist militias loyal to Ankara fighting in Syria and Libya,” the paper added. It said that in the first week of October alone, 1,300 fighters from Syrian militias and 150 fighters from Libyan militias had deployed to fight in the Karabakh war. It alleged that Islamist militias recruit fighters in Syria’s Afrin province, transport them to the Turkish city of Şanlıurfa and by plane to Azerbaijan.

The danger of a horrific escalation in the region, already torn apart by decades of war, is very real. Moreover, none of the regional regimes—the Turkish or Iranian Islamist regimes or the post-Soviet capitalist kleptocracy in the Kremlin—have anything to offer to workers. They are jockeying to assert their interests and position themselves for a deal to be endorsed by the imperialist powers that have plundered the region for decades. Against this, the way forward is the unification of workers in the region, across all ethnic lines, and beyond in a socialist struggle against war and capitalism.


https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/10/19/cauc-o19.html?fbclid=IwAR33f2ijJa1M8iPQaRe74xsN5o73Vfi2YqJ8TrX-LAsKEIWeppgNwCi3Im4

Thousands of Trump supporters descend on O.C. ahead of his arrival for Newport Beach fundraiser

KTLA Los Angeles
Oct 18 2020

Thousands of American-flag-waving Trump supporters descended upon Newport Beach on Sunday in anticipation of the president’s arrival for a fundraiser to bolster his reelection bid on Nov. 3.

Red MAGA hats were ubiquitous in the crowd and masks were scant. The sound of country music mingled with shouts of “Four more years!”

Meanwhile, hundreds of Armenian Americans joined the demonstration, in a show of solidarity with Armenia in its battle with neighboring Azerbaijan over a small separatist region on the border of the former Soviet republics. They demanded that Trump take action against Turkey, which has expressed support for Azerbaijan.

“Armenia needs Trump!” a protester, his shoulders draped in the orange, red and blue Armenian flag, yelled into a megaphone. “Save Christian Armenia!” Many of the Armenian American demonstrators were also Trump supporters.

Read the full story on LATimes.com.


Israeli academics ask Israel: Stop arms sales to Azerbaijan

Israel National News
Oct 18 2020
 
 
 
 
Azerbaijan is a friend of Israel, but Turkey is helping in its war against Armenia. Should Israel be selling arms to the Azeris? Op-ed.
 
Uzay Bulut , 18/10/20 10:41
 
Since September 27, Azerbaijan has launched a major offensive against the Armenian Republic of Artsakh, also known as Nagorno-Karabakh, located in the South Caucasus. Azerbaijan has since indiscriminately bombed civilians, with the direct support it receives from Turkey, who recruited jihadists from Syria and elsewhere.
 
The Israeli government, it seems, continues to sell weapons to Azerbaijan during the height of this war. In an open letter on October 5, a group of academics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem called upon the Israeli government to immediately cease these arms sales. The letter reads, in part:
 
“From a reading of independent accounts and analysis we have concluded that this outbreak of violence in the last few days is due solely to aggression of the Republic of Azerbaijan, supported by Turkey and backed up by fighters from elsewhere in the region.”
 
“This belligerence has been directed towards military and civilian targets in the Republic of Artsakh and its mainly Armenian population, and deserves to be condemned in no uncertain terms. The response of the Republic of Artsakh and the Republic of Armenia is clearly one of defense of population, property and territory, and should enjoy the support of those who cherish the principle of self-determination of peoples.”
 
On October 15, the World Union of Jewish Students (WUJS) issued a statement on the situation in Artsakh, saying, in part:
 
“We call on the Israel Government to cease all exports of weapons to Azerbaijan while the conflict is ongoing, and instead to play a role as a peace-seeking mediator.”
 
Artsakh is an integral part of historical Armenia. It has preserved its predominantly Armenian demographic character and semi-independent status as an Armenian entity despite falling under various invaders (such as Turkic nomadic tribes) throughout the centuries.
 
In 1805, the Russian Empire annexed Artsakh. In the early 1920s, Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin placed Artsakh under the administration of Soviet Azerbaijan as an autonomous oblast (administrative division) although the region was predominantly Armenian.
 
The people of Artsakh were exposed to “a policy of economic and social discrimination and political repression” at the hands of Soviet Azerbaijan. From 1988 to 1990, in response to repeated requests by the people of Artsakh for reunification with Armenia, Azerbaijan resorted to violent persecution. This included pogroms and mass killings against Armenians in Sumgait, Kirovabad, Baku, and other Azerbaijani cities. When Artsakh finally declared independence in 1991, Azerbaijan responded by launching a full-scale war against the territory, targeting civilians and destroying villages and towns.
 
Twenty-nine years later, Artsakh is once again under attack. “Nagorno-Karabakh is our land,” Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev said in a televised address to his nation on October 4. “This is the end. We showed them who we are. We are chasing them like dogs.”
 
On the same day, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) reported that in Artsakh:
 
“Hundreds of homes and key infrastructures like hospitals and schools have been destroyed or damaged by heavy artillery fire and by airborne attacks including missiles. Other infrastructures such as roads, electricity, gas, and communication networks have also been damaged. Families are on the move looking for safe shelter, while others have retreated underground to unheated basements sheltering day and night from violence.”
 
Despite the temporary ceasefire brokered by Russia announced on October 10, Azerbaijan continues indiscriminately shelling Artsakh, including its capital, Stepanakert. Azerbaijani armed forces even targeted a hospital, where civilians are receiving medical treatment, Artsakh Beklaryan, the region’s human rights ombudsman, reported on October 14.
 
Azeri-Turkish wanton violence against Armenian civilians and residential areas confirms what Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced on October 7:
 
“What we are facing is an Azeri-Turkish international terroristic attack,” he told Sky News. “To me there is no doubt that this is a policy of continuing the Armenian genocide and a policy of reinstating the Turkish empire.”
 
Pashinyan was referring to the 1913-23 Christian genocide against Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks at the hands of Ottomans and nationalist Turks, who largely wiped out the victims from their ancient homeland.
 
On October 11, Arayik Harutyunyan, the president of Artsakh Republic, posted on Twitter:
 
“Israel is aware its weapons are used against the civilian population in Artsakh. Israeli drones were used for offensive & not defensive purposes back in April 2016. They are accomplices of Azerbaijan’s genocidal policy, despite being a nation that survived genocide.”
 
Meanwhile, Azerbaijani-Turkish attacks have displaced half of Artsakh’s population, according to its rights ombudsman Beklaryan.
 
“They left because of the shelling of civilians,” said the president of Armenia, Armen Sarkissian, in an interview with the German newspaper Bild. “And it wasn’t just one bomb that killed people, and not two bombs. There is shelling every day! Look at Stepanakert from the air… It looks like German cities during the Second World War.” (Not a very useful comparison to Israeli ears, as the Allied forces and Jews felt that the bombing of German cities was well-deserved.)
 
Arthur Atanesyan, a professor at the department of Applied Sociology of Yerevan State University, said that “By providing offensive weaponry to Azerbaijan, and especially in times of active offensive operations by Azerbaijan, backed by Turkey, on the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, any state, including Israel, becomes a supporter of the anti-democratic forces.”
 
He continued:
 
“Turkey with its authoritarian leader and Azerbaijan as a totalitarian state with no political opposition and no freedoms and with many jailed journalists and aggressive rhetoric about the region, instrumentalized regional conflicts as a tool for their national identity construction. Hate speech is the only message constantly expressed by the Azerbaijani leading clan about other parties of negotiation process around Karabakh conflict, and military actions toward civilians in Karabakh are their way of conflict behavior aimed at another Genocide of Armenians on their homeland.
 
“Any third state supporting Azerbaijan politically and/or militarily, assists to the continued attempts of these two Turkish states to repeat the Genocide of Armenians that was committed by Turkey one hundred years ago and that still remains unpunished. And any military or political assistance by the third states to the Turkish aggression in Karabakh serves the criminal elites in both states of ‘the same nation’. It is important to note that Islamists and terrorists have also been invited by Turkish leaders to fight against democratic Armenian society in Karabakh and in Armenia.
 
“Having being exposed to the terrible crime of Holocaust by Nazi Germany, the Israeli society must feel and understand the suffering of Armenian civilians in Karabakh, and immediately ban its government from providing offensive weaponry to the totalitarian regime of Azerbaijan in order not to serve as a tool for the two Turkish states, and not to appear in the list of assistants of another cruel crime.”
 
On October 13, the Israeli High Court of Justice rejected a petition to ban arms sales to Azerbaijan “as lacking evidence to justify a hearing on whether they have been used for war crimes against Armenia,” reported The Jerusalem Post.
 
“Since the beginning of the war the Armenian side has been publishing photo and video evidence that proves the deployment of cluster munitions from Israel to Azerbaijan,” said historian Anahit Khosroeva, a professor at Yerevan State University. She continued:
 
“However, Israel’s High Court of Justice rejected a petition to ban arms sales to Azerbaijan.,,We, Armenians, do not see any solidarity from the people who went through the Holocaust.
 
“Since the current war in Artsakh started, I believe additional weapons were brought from Israel to Azerbaijan three times. The cargo planes of the Azerbaijani Silk way airlines, majority of whose shares belong to Azerbaijani president Aliyev’s daughter, have been operating flights from Baku to Israeli’s Uvda region, where Israel has an airbase, and back. As a genocide scholar, I strongly condemn that even during Artsakh war, Israel continues to supply arms and weapons to Azerbaijan, which, certainly, exacerbates the situation along the frontline. By now the Israeli government should know that the weapons they sell are being used against the civilian population not only of Artsakh, but also of the Republic of Armenia. This is unacceptable.”
 
Armenia said on October 1 that it had recalled its ambassador to Israel over their arms sales to Azerbaijan, who has acknowledged using Israeli-made weapons against Artsakh. “While the Israeli Defense Ministry does not publish details of sales by country, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in 2016 said his country had bought $4.85 billion in defense equipment from the Jewish state,” according to an op-ed on Arutz Sheva.
 
Yoav Loeff, a lecturer of Armenian history and language at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, commented:
 
“I think that the selling of Israeli weapons to Azerbaijan is problematic for three main reasons. The first and most important one is the humanitarian factor ‒ we see that Azerbaijan acts again and again as an aggressor, both towards the Republic of Artsakh and towards Armenia itself. In this current war, the Azeri side has been using masses of weapons, including Israeli ones, to deliberately target civilian population. This is immoral and violates the international law. Israel should stop providing weapons that are used this way.
 
“A second important reason is that one sided military involvement in the South Caucasus harms the tightening of relationship between Israel and Armenia (e.g., Armenia’s recent returning of its ambassador who had just arrived in Israel). The third reason is the fact that Azerbaijan cooperates in the current war with Islamic extremists. That raises the concern that although Israel and Azerbaijan are currently in good relations, ideas and interests may change over time, and we should be worried about possibilities that the Israeli weapons that were sold to Azerbaijan may be used in the future against Israel itself or against Israel ‘s allies. For all these reasons, it would be wise if the Israeli government reassesses its policy in the South Caucasus and the ways to make it more balanced.
 
“Also, the war over the tiny piece of land of Artsakh / Nagorno Karabakh seems to become more and more a matter of world politics. With the deep involvement of Russia, Turkey and other international forces, the future developments are very difficult to predict. Massive involvement of Israel with one side (the Azeri one) may lead to unpredictable complications. This may be an additional reason for Israel to reconsider its involvement.”
 
As of October 12, over 500 members of the Artsakh army have lost their lives, according to Armenian sources. Azerbaijan does not disclose military casualties. The Armenian Weekly reported on October 14 that “at least 70 civilians on both sides of the contact line have been killed with over one hundred wounded.” On October 15, video footage from the village of Hadrut in Artsakh emerged of Azeri soldiers capturing and later executing two Armenian soldiers. Mistreatment and murder of prisoners of war is prohibited under the Third Geneva Convention and is considered a war crime.
 
Donna Shalev, a Professor of Classical Studies of Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said:
 
“I have great respect for the cultural and intellectual legacies of Armenia over the generations. I also empathize deeply with the Armenians’ right to life after all that they have suffered. Most of all, I am politically and morally concerned with and hugely disappointed by the foreign policy actions by some elements in the Israeli government; civilized people here did not sign up for selling arms to an aggressor, just as we have for a long time been disappointed with the ‘realpolitik’-motivated avoidance of officially recognizing the Armenian holocaust.”
 
Meanwhile, Jewish Armenians have also expressed their fears stemming from Israel’s arms sales to Azerbaijan. Journalist Lara Setrakian wrote for Haaretz: “An Armenian Jewish friend came over to my home in Yerevan. She is anguished. ‘Armenians are David,’ she says, and asks: ‘Why is Israel arming a genocidal Goliath?'”
 
Suren Aghasi Manukyan, the head of the department of Comparative Genocide Studies at Yerevan’s Armenian Genocide Museum and Institute, noted:
 
“As a scholar who engaged many years in genocide studies, I believe that genocide totally transforms society. It changes its understanding of human nature and worldview. It provides the victim community high empathy and compassion. The societies that have gone through genocide are more sensitive to others’ sufferings and pains, and indeed it should get a lot more selective in making friends and alliances. And we expect such a stance from Israel.”
 
“Now Israeli weapons are used by Azerbaijan to target civilians and civilian infrastructure in Artsakh and Armenia. It is time for civil society of Israel, academics, cultural and religious leaders to demand from their government to reconsider and cease arm-sales agreements with Azerbaijan as its policy can be considered not only as warning signs for genocide but also as genocidal in nature themselves; as conspiracy to commit genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide and attempt to commit genocide, which according to the UN Genocide Convention are acts that all states of the world are obliged to prevent and punish.”
 
In 2019, Israeli historian professors Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi co-published a ground-breaking book, The Thirty-Year Genocide: Turkey’s Destruction of Its Christian Minorities, 1894–1924, in which they documented Ottoman Turkey’s genocide against Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks. Professor Ze’evi, who teaches at the Department of Middle East Studies of the Ben Gurion University of the Negev, said:
 
“The recent bout of warfare in Nagorno Karabagh/Artsakh has no justification. This current flare-up emerged mainly from Azeri president Aliyev’s internal problems and from Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s aggressive (and perhaps expansionist) foreign policy that we have seen in Syria, Iraq, Libya, the Aegean, and even inside Turkey. Azerbaijan and Turkey have taken advantage of the paralysis in the world as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and America’s isolationism under Donald Trump, to further their aims in this battle-torn region.
 
“I believe we should not supply arms to any of the sides in this clearly immoral and vicious campaign. I also believe, as do many other Jews, that we who have suffered atrocities in the past should not assist an act of violence directed against a nation that has suffered as much as the Armenians did through modern history. I know Israel has a long friendship and a clear strategic interest in keeping good relations with Azerbaijan, but it has no business assisting it with arms shipments. Israel should send a field hospital, food and medicine, or even peacekeepers, but we should not have Israeli war machines participating in this war.” 
 

CivilNet: Day 21, Diary of War, Artsakh / Nagorno Karabakh

CIVILNET.AM

00:48

By Lika Zakaryan, A letter to war.

Undear War, 

A girl is writing to you from Karabakh, a place, where you’ve settled recently. I know you are not loved anywhere, but I will be honest with you, I want you to know you’re not welcome here either. We already know each other, don’t we? Aren’t you tired of coming to our doors? I am not writing this just to express my anger, really. What I want is to say – go away, please. 

I speak on behalf of mothers – stop taking our sons. Can you imagine how it feels? To share a body with your child for nine months, not to sleep at nights, when his temperature goes up, learn every letter with him, blow on his wounds when he falls off the bike for the first time, get worried when he fights with boys from the yard, be nearby, when he’s having his first ever, unreturned love… And after he turns 18, send him to you…How should we live with it? We aren’t even able to die with it… War, leave our sons to us! 

On behalf of many sisters – please, do not take our brothers, they still have to turn from brothers into fathers. They’re our first friends, the most reliable, the dearest. With whom am I going to watch my favorite movies, share chips and other unhealthy things. Who can I laugh with until the morning? Who’s going to show me a new song? Their care can’t be replaced with anything. And moreover, their love and reliability.  

I speak on behalf of children – don’t take our fathers. He is my defender, isn’t he? Who is going to teach me how to live in this big and cruel world? Who is going to take my hand, go into the yard and take back my ball from the boys in our yard? Do you have the slightest idea how I would feel at parents’ meetings at school, where there will be all other fathers but not mine?  And when I start dating his parents would ask me, “Who’s your father? What does he do? Where does he work?” Who is going to take me to church, down the aisle? Who will I dance the Father and the Bride dance with? Don’t take him, please. 

I speak on behalf of girls whose sweethearts are on the frontline. Don’t take them, I am begging. Do you think we can live without them? We have already agreed on children’s names, argued about whether we should take a kitten or a puppy. I’ve  almost convinced him. Don’t break our hearts, we won’t be able to love again. It’s not easy to love, not at all, we hardly managed to find what is ours in this world. Don’t leave us without a strong shoulder, we’re looking forward to seeing them…

Who are you leaving us to? How should we keep smiling? Don’t be so merciless, you’ve already got too many. 

But if you are, then take me too!”

CivilNet: Nouvelle violation de la seconde tentative de cessez-le-feu

CIVILNET.AM

11:03

By Ani Paitjan

Le nouveau cessez-le-feu conclu entre l’Arménie et l’Azerbaïdjan et entré en vigueur le 18 octobre à minuit a déjà été violé par les forces azerbaïdjanaises. 

Selon l’Armée de défense de la République du Haut-Karabakh, le nouvel accord de trêve temporaire humanitaire conclu à Moscou a été respecté de manière générale durant la nuit, sauf de 00:04 à 02:25 dans le nord de la région et de 02:20 à 02:25 dans le sud, où les forces azerbaïdjanaises ont fait usage de tire de lance-grenades. 

Vers 07:20, les forces azerbaïdjanaises ont attaqué en direction du sud, 

dans les environs du Khoda Afarin Dam (réservoir), pour adopter une position plus favorable. Le réservoir est un barrage situé à la frontière entre le Haut-Karabakh et l’Iran sur la rivière de l’Araxe qui sert à la production d’énergie hydroélectrique et à l’irrigation. 

Selon la secrétaire de presse de l’Armée de défense de l’Arménie, il y a des morts et des blessés des deux côtés.

L’Arménie et l’Azerbaïdjan s’étaient mis d’accord pour une seconde tentative de trêve humanitaire temporaire permettant l’échange de corps et de prisonniers. La décision avait été après une nouvelle médiation avec les présidents français, russe et américain qui sont les coprésidents du Groupe de Minsk de l’OSCE. Ce groupe est en charge de la résolution pacifique du conflit dans le Haut-Karabakh depuis 1992.

La première tentative du 10 octobre a très vite été violé par l’Azerbaïdjan, entraînant une nouvelle escalade de la violence dans la région.

CivilNet: Baku refuse le retrait du champs de bataille des soldats blessés

CIVILNET.AM

15:49

Ani Paitjan 

Une tentative de retirer les soldats blessés des deux partis a, pour le moment, échoué. 

Un second cessez-le-feu humanitaire temporaire a été décrété le 18 octobre à minuit entre les forces arméniennes et azerbaïdjanaise. Cette trêve a pour but le transfert respectif de prisonniers de guerre et de corps avec la médiation du Comité international de la Croix Rouge (CICR). 

Cependant, les discussions pour atteindre l’objectif de ce cessez-le-feu ont essuyé le refus catégorique de Baku. En d’autres mots, l’Azerbaïdjan ne permet pas de sauver du champ de bataille les soldats blessés, arméniens et azerbaïdjanais. 

“Cela atteste du fait que le clan d’Aliyev (président de l’Azerbaïdjan, ndlr), qui s’est transformé en instrument de l’expansionnisme turc dans la région, se préoccupant seulement de la mainmise du pouvoir tout en étant terrifié à la perspective inévitable de rendre des comptes devant son propre peuple pour avoir déclenché une guerre et pour les nombreuses vies perdues, essaie de reporter l’inévitable moment de vérité,” a déclaré le ministère arménien des affaires étrangères. 

CivilNet: Azerbaijani Mothers Issue Statement Calling for Unification Against Aliyev

CIVILNET.AM

05:28

TolishMedia reports that Azerbaijani mothers have issued a statement demanding that the authorities in the country answer why their sons were sent to the frontlines and killed.

“Our sons are sacrificing their lives to preserve the corrupt dictatorship of Ilham Aliyev. These days our sons are fighting not to return our sacred lands, but to maintain Aliyev’s power,” the statement said.

The mothers encourage unity against Azerbaijan’s corrupt dictatorial clan. They are also demanding to know where their children’s corpses are, and what exactly Azerbaijan has been able to achieve in the war.

“Aliyev thinks of nothing except how to maintain his corrupt regime at the cost of our sons’ lives. We must not allow our children to be sacrificed,” they wrote.

CivilNet: Un appel à une paix durable au Haut-Karabagh

CIVILNET.AM

05:46

Chers amis,

Nous écrivons cette lettre dans l’espoir que vous vous joindrez à l’appel international en faveur d’un cessez-le-feu pour mettre fin à l’effusion de sang et au carnage humain et culturel qui ont lieu depuis le 27 septembre 2020 dans ce qui a été décrit comme la “république arménienne de facto de l’Artsakh (Haut-Karabakh)” à l’intérieur des frontières de l’Azerbaïdjan de l’ère soviétique.

Depuis les féroces conflits frontaliers qui se sont déroulés au moment de la création de l’Arménie soviétique et de l’Azerbaïdjan soviétique, le malaise ethnique a couvé dans la région et s’est transformé en conflit ouvert lors de la désintégration de l’URSS. Depuis lors, c’est une histoire de conflits et de milliers de petits cessez-le-feu faits pour être rompus. De sérieux affrontements militaires ont commencé en 2016 ; là encore avec des cessez-le-feu rompus. Aujourd’hui, la violence semble avoir augmenté de façon exponentielle et le dernier cessez-le-feu négocié par la Russie a été rompu dès le 10 octobre. Les Azéris ont bombardé non seulement la ville de Hadrut dans l’Artsakh (Haut-Karabakh), mais aussi une région au sein du territoire Arménien. Il y a des morts civils et de nombreux blessés … et nous ne savons pas à quoi nous attendre dans les jours à venir.

Cette destruction massive fait partie de la politique territoriale expansive et violente du président turc Recep Tayyip Erdoğan pour rétablir une version du pouvoir ottoman dans la région. Nous serions plus proches d’un compromis si l’Azerbaïdjan avait une structure de gouvernance plus ouverte que la Turquie avec de vrais systèmes internes de contrôle du pouvoir.  Dans l’état actuel des choses, nous constatons que l’Azerbaïdjan, soutenu par la Turquie, est en train de nettoyer de sa population d’origine arménienne l’Artsakh (Haut-Karabakh), une enclave historiquement arménienne intégré dans ses frontières de l’ère soviétique. La ligne de front des soldats de l’Azerbaïdjan serait composée non seulement de mercenaires et de combattants rebelles de Syrie et de Libye, mais aussi de minorités vivant en Azerbaïdjan comme les Lezgins, les Talyshs, les Avars, les Tats, les Udis, les Tsakhur, les Ingiloys, les Rutuls et les Kurdes. Nous appelons ces minorités à soutenir plutôt qu’à s’opposer à la lutte minoritaire des Arméniens.

L’effacement de la culture arménienne au Nakhitchevan entre 1997 et 2006 nous donne une idée de la gravité de la violence ininterrompue et de la destruction implacable de vies et de biens civils de minorités de longue date, dont nous avons été témoins au cours des dernières décennies. Nous rappelons que les cibles des bombardements incluent des sites archéologiques tels que l’ancienne ville arménienne de Tigranakert.

Avant les ravages causés par la Première Guerre mondiale et le XXe siècle, les Azéris et les Arméniens de la région vivaient dans le type de coexistence conflictuelle que nous connaissons dans les régions multiethniques du monde. Nous demandons maintenant non seulement un accord de cessez-le-feu, mais aussi une pression sur la préservation de ce cessez-le-feu et la protection de la minorité arménienne dans ses efforts d’autodétermination. Nous espérons, à long terme, avec la participation de toutes les institutions internationales de justice, que la volonté démocratique des Arméniens de la région pourra être reconnue.

En solidarité,

Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Université de Colombia

Tariq Ali, Ecrivain

Viken Berberian, Ecrivain

Noam Chomsky, Université d’Arizona

Judith Herman, École de médecine d’Harvard

Cornel West, Université d’Harvard

Seyla Benhabib, Université de Yale