CivilNet: UN Security Council Called on Armenia and Azerbaijan to Respect a New Ceasefire in Karabakh

CIVILNET.AM

03:12

United Nations Security Council members called on Armenia and Azerbaijan to respect a new ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh during a meeting on the disputed region on October 19, AFP reports. 

During the closed-door meeting, which was requested by France, Russia and the United States, the council’s 15 members reiterated a plea by UN chief Antonio Guterres for parties to honor a new ceasefire.

“Everyone was saying the same thing: the situation is bad and both sides need to pull back and heed the Secretary-General’s calls for a ceasefire,” a UN diplomat told AFP.

The full text is expected to be agreed between council members this week. It will also call on both sides to resume negotiations within the framework of the Minsk Group.

The Minsk Group, co-chaired by Russia, France, and the US, was created by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe in 1992 to spearhead efforts for a peaceful solution in the Karabakh conflict.

The renewed fighting between the sides began on September 27, following an Azerbaijani offensive, backed by artillery fire and precision drone strikes. The New York Times reports that while Armenia’s limited air defenses have failed to stop the drones, but its troops, bolstered by volunteers and conscripts, have slowed the Azerbaijani advance. The use of Syrian mercenaries, deployed by Turkey to Azerbaijan, has added a new layer of security issues in the region. 

The first UNSC closed-door meeting on the renewed fighting took place on Sept. 30.

CivilNet: Paris Mayor: "I’m in favor of self-determination and Armenia must be supported in this struggle"

CIVILNET.AM

03:50

If the only solution to the current conflict is the recognition of Nagorno Karabakh as an independent state, then there is no need to delay this, stated Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo in an interview with Nouvelles d’Armenie Magazine on October 19. 

On October 15, twenty two members of the French parliament demanded that the National Assembly of France pass a resolution recognizing Nagorno Karabakh’s independence. When asked about this initiative, Mayor Hidalgo answered that she understands the approach taken by parliament members.

“If the only solution to the current conflict is the recognition of Nagorno Karabakh as an independent state, then we should not hesitate to accept that. However, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs believes that only the efforts of the Minsk Group Co-Chairs can bring peace and security to the region. Therefore, I do not want to hinder France’s efforts to find a solution peacefully. I am in regular contact with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which is working effectively and pragmatically to end the conflict and allow Armenians to live in peace and security in Nagorno-Karabakh as well as in Armenia. I share the ideas of the French government, which, together with the other Minsk Group Co-Chairs, seeks to end the clashes and return to negotiations. Personally, I am in favor of self-determination and that Armenia must be supported in this struggle,” stated the mayor of Paris.  

The Minsk Group, co-chaired by Russia, France, and the US, was created by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe in 1992 to spearhead efforts for a peaceful solution in the Karabakh conflict.

CivilNet: The Karabakh War Inside Azerbaijani Media

CIVILNET.AM

05:09

Ceasefire

The October 17 ceasefire in Karabakh was depicted in Azerbaijani media as a gesture of “goodwill” in response to Armenian pleas. Following internal criticism after announcing the October 10 ceasefire, this time around, Azerbaijan’s pro-government press attempted to reduce oppositional voices by alleging that the Armenian side is attempting to establish contact with President Ilham Aliyev through any means possible. 

With these tactics, Azerbaijan aims to reduce criticism from opposition groups regarding the humanitarian ceasefire, and to show them that official Baku, just like before, is still resolute in its actions in Karabakh. Shortly after the announcement of the October 17 ceasefire, spokeswoman for Azerbaijan’s Foreign Affairs Minister Leyla Abdullayeva told CNN Turk that the new humanitarian ceasefire does not mean the end of hostilities.

Azerbaijan’s officials and pro-government media continue to present the events on the frontline exclusively in a triumphant light, and they continue to convince its population that Armenia violated the October 10 Moscow ceasefire, which they insist is consistent with Armenia’s previous actions. The pro-government Azerbaycan24 news agency published an article claiming that on May 7, 1992, one day after the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran met in Iran to negotiate a ceasefire, Armenian forces captured Shushi and by doing so, violated the agreement. 

Opposition

Azerbaijan’s political opposition continues to criticize the country’s foreign policies. Despite severe media restrictions inside Azerbaijan, information from various Facebook pages suggest that the country’s opposing party wishes to replace the country’s Foreign Minister Jayun Bayramov with Tural Abbasilin, the leader of the opposition White Party. On October 15, information surfaced about the death of Abbassi’s brother in the war.

On October 18, Ali Karimli, the leader of Azerbaijan’s oppositional People’s Front Party (also known as People’s Front Party) wrote on his official Facebook page that it has been roughly six months since his and his wife’s phones and internet access have been blocked. Karimli warned that the political motives for blocking communications are a huge mistake on part of the leadership. In yet another Facebook post by Karimli, the Azerbaijiani opposition figure expressed his admiration for the people of Belarus. Posting a video of a rally, Karimli stated that the crackdown could not stop the country’s citizens, adding that freedom overcomes fear. 

In addition to political groups, Azerbaijani leadership is also facing opposition from minority groups inside the country, such as the Talysh community. 

The Facebook page of one of the Talysh politicians living in Russia notes that the head of the Azerbaijani community in Moscow Aghadadash Karimov recently visited him. The Talysh people of Azerbaijan have repeatedly complained that the Azerbaijani leadership is deliberately sending the country’s minorities—especially the Talysh—to the frontlines, thus distorting the demographic image of the Talysh in Azerbaijan. Karimov’s visit is perhaps an attempt to settle existing problems with the Talysh community by propagating unity. 

Turkey

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan delivered a speech in the Kurdish town of Shernak on Oct. 18, in which not only he expressed his dissatisfaction with the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs’ work but he also openly criticized Russia, France, and the US for allegedly providing weapons to Armenia. With this, Erdogan is again attempting to show that Turkey’s support to Azerbaijan is more than legitimate.

Erdogan’s statement is in line with Aliyev’s October 17 message, in which the latter expressed his surprise at the abundance of ammunition in Armenia, suggesting that Armenia has received assistance from other countries. 

There are also attempts to create a joint Azerbaijani-Turkish information platform to facilitate communication between the two countries, which has been actively discussed in Azerbaijan since early September of this year. On October 15, Azerbaijani Presidential Aide Hikmet Hajiyev tweeted a telephone conversation between President Aliyev, President Erdoğan, and Fahrettin Altun, Turkey’s Chief of Staff for Public Relations. During their discussions, all parties praised the initiative for a unified information center and noted that a propaganda attack is being carried out against Azerbaijan and Turkey.

It should be emphasized that during the war, Turkey has regularly followed Azerbaijani news and has quoted the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan consistently. Also, the Azerbaijani news agency Haber Global operates in Turkey, which fully supports the viewpoints of Azerbaijan in Turkey.

COVID-19

The public health situation in Azerbaijan continues to destabilize as COVID-19  cases rise in the country. Education institutions have been ordered to close until November 2. The Baku metro system has also been shut down.

Tbilisi cathedral hosts Armenian, Azerbaijani clergy in interfaith vigil as fighting in Karabakh continues

Agenda, Georgia
Oct 19 2020

A Tbilisi cathedral hosted an interfaith vigil involving Armenian and Azerbaijani clergy last week as an effort for “peace and reconciliation” amid armed conflict between the two countries in the Karabakh region.

At the Peace Cathedral, located on Kedia Street in the Georgian capital, Yezidi, Muslim and Christian clergy came together to not only observe the vigil but also pledge to begin daily prayers at the church “until the war is over”.

In the display of joint wishes for peace Father Narek Kushian of the Armenian community and his Azerbaijani counterpart Sheikh Mirtag Asadov joined Malkhaz Songulashvili, the Metropolitan Bishop of Tbilisi, who led the service. Yezidi Akhtiar of Georgia, Dimitri Pirbari, was also part of the vigil while bishops Rusudan Gotziridze and Ilia Osephashvili joined as well.

[W]e call all churches, synagogues, mosques, temples to offer prayers for peace and reconciliation between Armenia and Azerbaijan every Saturday at 19:00 (Tbilisi time) until the war is over.”

The faithful and clergy should feel free to offer their prayers either publicly or privately upon their convenience. Peace and reconciliation shall not have any other alternatives,” a joint statement by the community representatives said.


The representatives of the two clergies were also joined by their faithful as the vigil involved reading of scriptures from the Gospel and the Quran, while prayers were heard in Georgian, Armenian, Yezidi and Arabic.

Armenian and Azerbaijani communities have lived side-by-side in Tbilisi for centuries, with around 233,000 ethnic Azerbaijanis and 168,000 ethnic Armenians who call the capital city their home keeping calm as inter-ethnic confrontations were observed in other cities around the world on the backdrop of the war.

The vigil at the Peace Cathedral came on the backdrop of repeated armed clashes in the Karabakh region, following the start of hostilities in mid-September. Latest ceasefire violations in the region were reported on Sunday, after previous truce efforts failed.

https://agenda.ge/en/news/2020/3247?fbclid=IwAR0KGA-KiOPEciirxfNaZNqBI-0XYkVmbOuyOJ0iGX7MNBUEoc5dmCK5FXw

Armenians Came to SF to Escape Genocide. Now, Fears of That History Are Resurfacing

KQED
Oct 19 2020
Ericka Cruz GuevarraAlan Montecillo


Generations of Armenians and descendants of those who escaped the Armenian Genocide have found refuge in San Francisco. That’s the epicenter of a robust church community center and where Armenian Americans can celebrate their culture, history and heritage. It’s also where a recent spate of suspected hate crimes are raising fears about the current border conflict — and painful memories of violence.

Guest: Nastia Voynovskaya, KQED Arts and Culture editor and reporter


War in the Caucasus: One more effort to shape a new world order

WION
Oct 19 2020
WION Web Team Washington Oct 19, 2020, 03.51 PM(IST) Written By: James M Dorsey


Fighting in the Caucasus between Azerbaijan and Armenia is about much more than deep-seated ethnic divisions and territorial disputes. It’s the latest clash designed, at least in part, to shape new world order.
 
The stakes for Azerbaijan, backed if not egged on by Turkey, are high as the Azeri capital’s Baku International Sea Trade Port seeks to solidify its head start in its competition with Russian, Iranian, Turkmen and Kazakh Caspian Sea harbours, to be a key node in competing Eurasian transport corridors. Baku is likely to emerge as the Caspian’s largest trading port.
 
An Azeri success in clawing back some Armenian-occupied areas of Azerbaijan, captured by Armenia in the early 1990s, would bolster Baku’s bid to be the Caspian’s premier port at the crossroads of Central Asia, the Middle East and Europe.
 
The Caspian is at the intersection of the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR) from China to Europe via Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey and the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) that aims to connect India via Iran and Russia to Europe.
 
An Azeri military success would also cement Turkey’s claim to be a player in former Soviet lands that Russia views as its sphere of influence and bolster nationalist sentiment among Iranians of ethnic Azeri descent that account for up to 25 per cent of the Islamic republic’s population, many of whom have risen to prominence in the Iranian power structure.
 
In an indication of passions that the conflict in the Caucasus evokes, Iranians in areas bordering Azerbaijan often stand on hilltops to watch the fighting in the distance.
 
Iranian security forces have recently clashed with ethnic Azeri demonstrators in various cities chanting “Karabakh is ours. It will remain ours.” 
 
The demonstrators were referring to Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian enclave inside Azerbaijan that is at the core of the conflict in the Caucasus.
 
The demonstrations serve as a reminder of environmental protests in the Iranian province of East Azerbaijan at the time of the 2011 popular Arab revolts that often turned into manifestations of Azeri nationalism.
 
Baku port’s competitive position was bolstered on the eve of the eruption of fighting in the Caucasus with the launch of new railway routes from China to Europe that transit Azerbaijan and Turkey.
 
China last month inaugurated a new railway route from Jinhua in eastern China to Baku, which would reduce transport time by a third.
 
In June, China dispatched its second train from the central Chinese city of Xi’an to Istanbul via Baku from where it connects to a rail line to the Georgian capital of Tbilisi, the eastern Turkish city of Kars and onwards to Istanbul.
 
Azeri analysts charge that Armenian occupation of Azeri territory and demands for independence of Nagorno-Karabakh, threaten Baku’s position as a key node in Eurasian transport corridors.
 
“By continuing its occupation Armenia poses (a) threat not only to Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity but also to the regional stability and cooperation,” said Orkhan Baghirov, a senior researcher at the Baku-based Center of Analysis of International Relations, a think tank with close ties to the government.
 
Mr Baghirov was referring to recent Russian, Iranian, Turkmen and Kazakh efforts to match Baku in upgrading their Caspian Sea ports in anticipation of the TITR and INSTC taking off.
 
Russia is redeveloping Lagan Port into the country’s first ice-free Caspian Sea harbour capable of handling transhipment of 12.5 million tonnes. The port is intended to boost trade with the Gulf as well as shipment from India via Iran.
 
Lagan would allow Russia to tap into the TITR that is part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) via the Russian railway system as well as Kazakh, Turkmen, and Azeri ports.
 
It would also bolster Russian, Iranian and Indian efforts to get off the ground the INSTC that would hook up Caspian Sea ports to create a corridor from India to Russia via Iran, and in competition with the Suez Canal, to northern Europe.

The INSTC would initially link Jawaharlal Nehru Port, India’s largest container port east of Mumbai, through the Iranian deep-sea port of Chabahar on the Gulf of Oman, funded by India to bypass Pakistan and its Caspian Sea port of Bandar-e-Anzali to Russia’s Volga River harbour of Astrakhan and onwards by rail to Europe.

Iranian and Indian officials suggest the route would significantly cut shipping time and costs from India to Europe. Senior Indian Commerce Ministry official BB Swain said the hook up would reduce travel distance by 40 and cost by 30 per cent.

Iran is further investing in increased capacity and connectivity at its Amirabad port while at the same time emphasizing its naval capabilities in the Caspian.

For their part, Turkmenistan inaugurated in 2018 its US$1.5 billion Turkmenbashi Sea Port while Kazakhstan that same year unveiled its Kuryk port.

The fighting between Azerbaijan and Armenia with Turkey and Israel supporting the Azeris; Russia struggling to achieve a sustainable ceasefire; Iran seeking to walk a fine line in fighting just across its border; and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates attempting to stymie Iranian advances wherever they can, threatens to overlay port competition in the Caspian with aspects of the Middle East’s myriad conflicts.

Said Iran scholar Shireen T Hunter: “Largely because of the Iran factor, the Caucasus has become linked with Middle East issues. Israel and Saudi Arabia have tried to squeeze Iran through Azerbaijan… Thus, how the conflict evolves and ends could affect Middle East power calculations…. An expanded conflict would pose policy challenges for major international players.”

(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL.)

“The war will end and we will still have to live together here”

EurasiaNet.org
Oct 19 2020
Giorgi Lomsadze Oct 19, 2020

These are tense days for Georgia’s Armenians and Azerbaijanis.

The two groups make up the largest minorities in the country and both have been riveted by the new war between Armenian and Azerbaijan, now entering its fourth week. But both communities say that the war to the south, no matter how bloody, should not spoil their longstanding peaceful relations in Georgia.

Scissors stopped snipping at a barber shop in Tbilisi’s old city, for centuries host to a rich mix of groups including Georgians, Armenians, and Azerbaijanis, when the conversation turned to the war.

“Butchers, that’s who they are,” snapped the barber, Armen, a Tbilisi Armenian, referring to the Azerbaijanis his co-ethnics are fighting for control of the territory in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, about 250 miles from the Georgian capital.

Armen railed against the Syrian mercenaries that Turkey is accused of sending to fight on the side of its ally, Azerbaijan. He pulled up the Facebook page of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who had posted videos of a battlefield strewn with bodies and the alleged Syrians calling Armenians “Christian pigs.”

“Come on now, Armen,” his Georgian colleague pleaded. She gestured with her eyes at the shop’s clients, who were indeed raptly watching his tirade.

“See, my people are dying every day but nobody cares, here or anywhere,” Armen snapped back. “Putin doesn’t care, Trump doesn’t care, she is my friend, but even she doesn’t care.”

But then the topic of conversation shifted to Azerbaijanis closer to home.

“Ah, you mean the Azerbaijanis here in Georgia?” Armen said in a quieter tone. He took a few moments to respond. “They are actually very good people,” he said, a bit incredulous at his own observation. “Don’t quote me on this, but I’d say they are much nicer than some Armenians here,” he added after some thought and with a tight smile.

Armen eventually asked that his last name or the name of the parlor not be used in the story – “everyone is acting crazy these days and I don’t want trouble” – but he was willing to continue on the topic of the Georgian Azerbaijanis.

“They live quietly in Marneuli, work hard,” he said, referring to the region in southwestern Georgia with the largest concentration of ethnic Azerbaijanis. “She and I went to see a fortune-teller there once,” he added, pointing at the Georgian hairdresser, who nodded affirmatively. “We bought some vegetables at the market. I’m clearly an Armenian,” he added, pointing at his face, “but nobody cared.”

Azerbaijanis in Georgia are similarly passionate about the war, keeping count of the growing death toll and watching in shock as videos circulate of brutalities committed against their ethnic kin. But, like Armen, Georgian Azerbaijanis who spoke with Eurasianet also were careful not to direct their anger at the Armenians that they share a country with.

“It makes little sense for us to argue about the war,” said Tofig Bairamov, a handyman from a majority-Azerbaijani village of Mskhaldidi, who partners up with an Armenian from a nearby village to run a small home-repair business. The pair doesn’t see eye-to-eye on the matter of Nagorno-Karabakh, but Bairamov says it doesn’t get in the way of their working relationship.

“He will never admit it, but Armenia is in the wrong on Karabakh and to end this war [the territory] has to go back to Azerbaijan, period,” Bairamov said. “But governments start and end wars, so why should we argue about it?”

Glimmer of hope

Even as the violence and passions have flared to their south and east, Armenians and Azerbaijanis in Georgia have not turned on one another. When fighting broke out between the two sides in July, it sparked physical confrontations between Armenians and Azerbaijanis around the world, from Moscow to Los Angeles. But Georgia – home to 233,000 ethnic Azerbaijanis and 168,000 ethnic Armenians – remained calm. So far, that’s still the case.

“It is disappointing, heartbreaking to see some Georgian-Armenians, people you know and even worked with, openly take sides and share anti-Azerbaijani posts on social media,” said Kamran Mammadli, a Georgian-Azerbaijani minority rights activist. “But at least there have been no instances of direct confrontations, not to my knowledge.”

Yana Israelyan, a Tbilisi-based journalist of Armenian descent, said she had not seen much tension on social networks between Georgian Armenians and Azerbaijanis. “When you read Georgian-Azerbaijanis’ posts about this, you just opt not to engage, because you know that everyone will stick to their guns anyway,” she said.

“Armenians understand that local Azerbaijanis support Baku in the Karabakh conflict and, on the other hand, everyone knows where the loyalties of the local Armenians lie,” she went on. “But everyone also understands that the war will end and we will still have to live together here.”

Even if the relationship is not always chummy, the peaceful coexistence of Armenians and Azerbaijanis in Georgia offers a glimmer of hope for a region riven with ethnic conflict and boasting one of the world’s largest concentrations of territorial disputes per square mile.

Since the first war between Armenians and Azerbaijanis in the 1990s, Georgia has been the easiest place for people from Armenia and Azerbaijani to meet. Academics and civil society activists regularly convene in Tbilisi, and Armenians and Azerbaijanis every year make up the largest groups of foreign visitors to Georgia. Tourists stay at the same resorts and take the same road onward to Russia.

Georgia has long served as proof that trade interests and human contact can trump mutual grudges and the notion of “ancient hatred” cultivated by state propagandists in Armenia and Azerbaijan. The two peoples that former Armenian President Robert Kocharyan once notoriously described as “ethnically incompatible” mixed and mingled in Tbilisi for centuries. They live together in a handful of Georgian villages and also as separate communities in two regions, Azerbaijanis in Marneuli and Armenians in Samtskhe-Javakheti.  

Which is not to say that the environment in Georgia has not been fraught. Following the outbreak of the war, Georgia’s minorities have been actively rooting for their respective sides in the conflict. They have been sending aid to the frontlines and some even have volunteered to fight. Solidarity rallies have been held in Marneuli and Samtskhe-Javakheti.

“For every Armenian in Georgia, the morning begins with checking the news from Karabakh,” Israelyan said. “But Armenians living in Tbilisi and Armenians in Samtskhe-Javakheti see the conflict a bit differently. Maybe this is because Armenians in Samtskhe-Javakheti live together as a community, while in Tbilisi it is more mixed and there are closer contacts with people of other ethnic groups.”  

Neglect from Tbilisi

Part of the reason rural minorities tend to be more involved, emotionally or otherwise, in the neighboring countries’ war is that successive Georgian governments have consistently failed to meaningfully integrate non-Georgians into the country’s fabric, Mammadli, the rights activist, argued.

“The center does not care much for minority regions,” he said. “There is a lot of poverty and estrangement in these regions. They feel neglected by the rest of Georgia and therefore feel affinity with the neighboring countries.”    

As minorities, Armenians and Azerbaijanis actually have more that unites them than divides them, Mammadli argued. “We both face stereotypes here and are often treated as second-rate citizens, as we don’t fit into the notion of a Georgian as it is defined by the mainstream,” he said. “So we have a common cause to assert ourselves as Georgian citizens, gain better access to education, jobs, healthcare, political life, to be seen as Georgians even if we are not Georgians by blood.”   

While the Armenian-Azerbaijani modus vivendi in Georgia can potentially serve as a moderating influence, there are many pitfalls, as well. No country in the South Caucasus is happy with the shape and size of the territory that history has assigned to them, and Georgia also has plenty of issues with its two neighbors.

Aside from losing control of the Russian-backed breakaway territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Georgia also has locked horns with Azerbaijan over an ancient monastery complex that straddles a still-undefined stretch of the two countries’ border. Georgians also harbor fears of potential Armenian irredentism in Samtskhe-Javakheti.    

Careful neutrality

On the government level, Tbilisi, Yerevan and Baku maintain restraint on these fronts. Ordinary Georgians, however, can be prone to knee-jerk reactions to disputes on the monastery complex with Azerbaijan or to the faintest hint of Armenian separatism in Samtskhe-Javakheti.  

When Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan recently posted a photo of a rally in Samtskhe-Javakheti in support of Armenia, it prompted a minor furor in Georgian social networks. The photo was captioned “Javakh,” the Armenian term for the region, which to many Georgians sounded like a territorial claim.

Armenians joined the fray online to argue that the picture was merely intended to be one example of the solidarity being expressed by Armenian diasporas around the world, but it still resulted in some unsavory exchanges between Georgians and Armenians. Pashinyan’s Facebook account later changed the photo caption to “Javakheti.”

Some Armenians, for their part, have been aggrieved by Georgia’s hesitation to let aid shipments that local Armenians had gathered cross the border into Armenia. A few posted profanity-laced videos online and called for boycotting Georgia’s summer resorts, leading to more high-pitched exchanges with Georgians.

At the same time, Georgian prosecutors began a poorly timed criminal probe into years-old border negotiations with Azerbaijan.

Two Georgian cartographers have been arrested on charges of treason, accused of deliberately allowing part of the disputed monastery territory slip into Azerbaijan’s control under the previous ruling regime. The case, launched just weeks before parliamentary elections, seems suspiciously timed to discredit the former ruling party – now the main opposition – ahead of that vote. But it also seems a tone-deaf diplomatic move at a time of heightened regional tension.

Georgia maintains a careful neutrality in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, and both sides keenly watch for any deviation. A faux pas could open up sources of tension in a region where complicated history has left every group feeling that every other group has wronged them somewhere along the line.

Back at the salon, one inauspicious comment by the Georgian hairdresser triggered an outpouring of mutual grievances.

“For the life of me, I don’t get why you are killing each other over Karabakh,” the hairdresser told her Armenian colleague, Armen. “I looked up photos and there is nothing there. It is nothing like Abkhazia.”

Armen erupted. “So because you had a home in Abkhazia, had your palm trees and tangerines there, you support Azerbaijan and don’t care that my brothers and sisters are dying,” he said.  

The Georgian took offense. “I don’t support anyone,” she said. “And yes, I’m from Abkhazia and I know what it is like to be kicked out from your home. So yes, I understand when people want to go back to their homes.”

Soon the two were working their way through a lengthy list of old talking points: Georgians’ annoyance with Armenians’ preoccupation with the once extensive kingdom of Great Armenia, Georgian fears of cultural expropriation by Armenia, and the centuries-old Armenian churches in Tbilisi that Georgia would prefer to see reduced to ruin rather than be handed over to the Armenian Church.

When Armen finished the haircut, he offered an olive branch, of sorts.

“When you meet Azerbaijanis, tell them they are free to come and get a haircut here,” he said. “So long as they don’t mention Karabakh and the war.”

 

Giorgi Lomsadze is a journalist based in Tbilisi, and author of Tamada Tales.


https://eurasianet.org/the-war-will-end-and-we-will-still-have-to-live-together-here?fbclid=IwAR1-9EUM2vkOjDrF0sc4d68plKSvxxJ0u1BhChLe0RBdQsU_lUXQx3MR5Tk

Letter to Editor of The Toronto Star: Armenians are forced to fight to survive

The Toronto Star, Canada
Oct 19 2020
 
 
Armenians are forced to fight to survive
 
Mon., Oct. 19, 2020
I am writing to express my concern about reports of Azerbaijan’s attack on Armenians since Sept. 27.
 
There are a total of three million Armenians trying to protect themselves and their nation with very few resources. They are not the ones who initiated this war; they were living in peace.
 
Armenians are only fighting right now because they don’t want their entire nation to die. Armenians have suffered a genocide in 1915 (carried out by the Turks). Today, the Turks still deny this even happened.
 
Today, their goal is for Armenians to flee from Artsakh (which is originally an Armenian land and has hundreds of old Armenian churches to prove it).
 
The Turks are trying to finish the elimination of Armenians their grandfathers started.
 
These are the exact words of the Turkish president today.
 
Turkey is helping Azerbaijan with this war.
 
There are a total of 90 million Azeris and Turks, so why and how would Armenians be able to initiate this war? Armenians know that they would never win; they don’t have any resources.
 
 
These are people trying to fight for their existence so they don’t lose everything that they have.
 
Tamara Sarkisian, Winnipeg
 
 
 
 
 
 

Turkey’s interest in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict motivated by control over Caucasus oil & gas supply, says Armenian president

RT – Russia Today
Oct 19 2020


Armenia’s President Armen Sarkissian believes Turkey provoked the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh to take control of energy supplies to Europe from the Caspian region, an area rich in ‘black gold’ and the location of many gas pipes.

Speaking to Moscow daily Kommersant, Sarkissian claimed that Turkey used to be “a consumer [of energy], but now will be a manager.”

“The longer the conflict lasts, the deeper Turkey’s presence in Azerbaijan will be,” the president claimed. “Turkey will be a neighbor of Russia, and they will essentially have a land border. Turkey will manage the oil and gas pipelines that are laid to Europe.”

According to Sarkissian, Ankara will now have direct influence over the energy security of both Europe and Central Asia by being able to control gas and oil it does not own.

On Sunday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan accused the US, Russia, and France of providing weapons to Armenia. The presidents of all three countries are chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, tasked since 1992 with ending the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.

On September 27, the region saw the most substantial escalation in violence for almost three decades. In the weeks since the fighting began, leaders from around the world have repeatedly called for peace in the region, including Russian President Vladimir Putin. Earlier this month, the countries agreed on a ceasefire, which quickly fell apart. The dispute between Azerbaijan and Armenia is decades old, with both countries believing they have strong claims over Nagorno-Karabakh. The region is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan but is primarily populated by ethnic Armenians. Baku considers the enclave to be illegally occupied by Armenia.


https://www.rt.com/russia/503916-sarkissian-turkey-karabakh-control/?fbclid=IwAR2gGGfHDdwRTYz6KxXdmzYdhmOug6TXh9BB2wO6W_y4ENeYJ24WhItL-4I

Syrian-Armenians protest against Turkey over involvement in Karabakh

AMN – Al Masdar News
Oct 19 2020
 
 
 
By News Desk -2020-10-19
 
BEIRUT, LEBANON (11:20 A.M.) – On Sunday, a large number of Syria’s Armenians gathered in the Al-Hasakah Governorate to protest against Turkey’s involvement in the ongoing Karabakh conflict.
 
According to locals in the Al-Hasakah Governorate, the Armenian protesters demanded Turkey end its aggression and support of Azerbaijan in the Krabakh region.
 
 
The protest was reportedly attended by dozens of people, including local Arabs, Assyrian/Syriacs, and Kurds.
 
Turkey is one of Azerbaijan’s closest allies and largest suppliers of weapons, including unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), which have been used against the Armenian forces in Karabakh.
 
In addition to military support, Turkey has joined Azerbaijan in launching diplomatic attacks against Armenia, as they repeatedly accuse Yerevan of starting the aggression in Karabakh.
 
 
 
At the start of the conflict, Yerevan accused Turkey of using one of its F-16 jets to shoot down an Armenian Su-25 aircraft that was taking off within its own airspace.
 
Turkey denied the accusation, but a New York Times report later revealed the presence of a Turkish F-16 jet in Azerbaijan and its movements prior to the downing of the Armenian Su-25 aircraft.