> >
>
> >
Wednesday, March 01, 2019 Pashinian Again Calls For Karabakh’s Engagement In Talks With Azerbaijan Armenia's and Nagorno-Karabakh's Security Councils hold a joint session in Stepanakert. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian again called for Nagorno-Karabakh’s becoming a full party to the negotiations as he addressed on Tuesday his top security aides ahead of his first meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev to be held with international mediators’ assistance sometime soon. Together with Nagorno-Karabakh leader Bako Sahakian Pashinian presided over the first-ever joint meeting of Armenia’s and Nagorno-Karabakh’s Security Councils held in the Karabakh capital of Stepanakert today. In his opening remarks before the start of the meeting the Armenian premier described it as “unprecedented” and “very symbolic” and singled out three main issues to be addressed by senior representatives of the Armenian political and military leadership. Pashinian reiterated that Nagorno-Karabakh’s becoming a full party to the negotiations conducted under the auspices of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s Minsk Group co-chairmanship (the United States, Russia, France) will be a key point during his upcoming discussions with Aliyev. “This is not a whim, nor a precondition. This is simple logic that Nagorno-Karabakh’s involvement is key to the settlement process,” Pashinian stressed, as quoted by his press office. Azerbaijan has opposed Nagorno-Karabakh’s participation in the talks as a separate party, insisting that the region is “occupied” by Armenia and negotiations should be held only with official Yerevan. At the same time, the Azerbaijani leadership has repeatedly raised the issue of ethnic Azerbaijanis displaced from Armenian-populated Nagorno-Karabakh during the 1988-1994 war. Pashinian explained that unlike Aliyev, for whom “Nagorno-Karabakh’s Azerbaijani community” also voted as current citizens of Azerbaijan, he cannot represent the people of Nagorno-Karabakh, since only citizens of Armenia voted for him and his political team in Armenian elections. The international community, Pashinian said, is represented at the negotiations by the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs. “So far, the negotiation process has in fact involved all stakeholders except one… The problem is that no one has the authority and legitimacy to represent the people of Nagorno-Karabakh at the negotiations today,” he said. At the same time, Pashinian described as absurd claims that by seeking Nagorno-Karabakh’s involvement in the process Armenia tries to shun responsibility and put the entire responsibility on the authorities or the people of Nagorno-Karabakh. “The Republic of Armenia has and will be the number one guarantor of Nagorno-Karabakh’s security and will continue its involvement in the peace process,” the Armenian prime minister underscored. In its latest statement issued over the weekend the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs reiterated that “a fair and lasting settlement must be based on the core principles of the Helsinki Final Act, including in particular the non-use or threat of force, territorial integrity, and the equal rights and self-determination of peoples.” “It also should embrace additional elements as proposed by the Presidents of the Co-Chair countries in 2009-2012, including: return of the territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijani control; an interim status for Nagorno-Karabakh providing guarantees for security and self-governance; a corridor linking Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh; future determination of the final legal status of Nagorno-Karabakh through a legally binding expression of will; the right of all internally displaced persons and refugees to return to their former places of residence; and international security guarantees that would include a peacekeeping operation,” the mediating troika said. Speaking before the Security Councils’ meeting in Stepanakert, Pashinian said that one of the questions to answer was whether the government of Armenia accepts these three principles and six elements as a basis for the negotiation process. “This is really an important question, but in answering this question we need important clarifications. What can these principles mean in practice and who has the right to interpret them? This is important, because the way Azerbaijan interprets these principles is unacceptable for us. We, of course, can come up with our own interpretation of these principles, but it’s pointless because our goal is not to engage in a war of words, but to have an efficient negotiation process. And consequently, the basis for the negotiation process should not leave room for different interpretations,” Pashinian said. “However, the principles and elements proposed by the co-chairs have given rise to all sorts of interpretations over the past 10 years and, therefore, the most important objective of the forthcoming negotiation process should be to clarify the so-called main concepts – the three principles and six elements, and we are ready also for such a conversation.” Another major issue pointed out by the Armenian prime minister at the Stepanakert meeting is preparing societies for peace. “I think it is necessary to emphasize that preparing the peoples for peace cannot be a separate issue of only one government involved in the negotiations. This should be joint work. I mean, for example, preparing Azerbaijan’s society should take place not only with the participation of Azerbaijan’s government but also with the participation of Armenia’s government. It was this consideration that forced me to make a statement from the parliament tribune last fall, a statement that was, in fact, unprecedented for our reality, as I said that any solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh issue should be acceptable for the people of Armenia, the people of Nagorno-Karabakh and the people of Azerbaijan… Unfortunately, we do not hear similar statements and do not see similar steps from the president of Azerbaijan. Despite this, I am ready to continue the dialogue not only with the president of Azerbaijan, but also with the people of Azerbaijan, because I am convinced that the people of Azerbaijan are as peace-loving as the people of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh,” Pashinian concluded. For his part, in his opening remarks Nagorno-Karabakh leader Sahakian, in particular, stressed that international recognition remains a priority for Stepanakert. As a result of discussions both security councils reaffirmed that Nagorno-Karabakh’s “defense capabilities are guaranteed and are at the high level.” “At the same time the two Armenian sides again expressed their support for and commitment to an exclusively peaceful settlement of the conflict under the aegis of the OSCE Minsk Group and on the basis of the fundamental principles of international law, in particular, the right of peoples to self-determination,” the Armenian prime minister’s press office said in the press release. Soldier Arrested In Karabakh Army Death Probe A soldier has been arrested in Nagorno-Karabakh on suspicion of killing a fellow conscript in the ethnic Armenian defense army reported earlier on Tuesday, according to investigators. The Armenia-based Investigative Committee said on its official website that the arrested soldier, whose identity is not disclosed yet, is suspected of committing murder. Earlier, military authorities in Nagorno-Karabakh reported that in the early hours of March 12, 19-year-old conscript Karen Karapetian sustained a fatal gunshot wound at an outpost in the northeastern direction of the ‘line of contact’ with Azerbaijan. Still at the early stage of the probe the Investigative Committee ruled out that the Armenian soldier might have been killed with a bullet released from Azerbaijani military positions. Press Review “Zhoghovurd” suggests that the recent statement by the American, Russian and French co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group contains no major news, but, in fact, repeats what has already been in the public domain for a long time. The only remarkable thing about the statement, according to the paper, is that it has for the first time been made during the tenure of new Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian. “It is after this statement that the Armenian prime minister went to Stepanakert where he met with Karabakh leader Bako Sahakian and is to chair an enlarged meeting of Armenia’s Security Council,” the daily writes. “Zhamanak” reports that during a press conference in Yerevan on Monday the NATO Secretary General’s Special Representative for the Caucasus and Central Asia James Appathurai stated that NATO was interested in peace in the region and that it had told all parties that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has no military solution. “The statement of NATO’s special representative in Yerevan is, in fact, a warning to Azerbaijan, which, simultaneously with NATO Week events in Armenia, is conducting large-scale military exercises without prior proper international notification,” the paper comments. “Aravot” suggests that the government should forge ahead with its reforms without paying too much attention to public opinion. “Otherwise, things won’t get moving. If there is a decision to ban smoking indoors, then it must be implemented and the health minister is right here. If the goal is to change the tax legislation, then it is necessary to hear the opinions of lawmakers of the so-called ‘economic bloc’ rather than conservative ministers. If it is necessary to free public institutions from idling employees, then one should disregard the wailing of social populists. Otherwise, staying in limbo for long may shut the window of opportunity opened by the people,” the daily’s editor writes. (Lilit Harutiunian) Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL Copyright (c) 2019 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc. 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org
Scholars from Armenia,
Austria, Iran, Russia and
Sweden Discussed Iran’s Role in the Changing World Order
, Yerevan, Armenia- leading
scholars from Armenia, Austria, Iran, Russia and Sweden were invited by the “China-Eurasia” Council for Political and Strategic Research,
foundation to introduce their research on Iran’s role in the changing world
order and Iran-Armenia relations. The key note speaker of this academic seminar
was Univ.- Prof. Dr. Heinz Gärtner (International Institute for Peace and
University of Vienna, Chair of the Advisory Committee
for Strategy and Security Policy of the Scientific Commission at the Austrian
Armed Forces). Among speakers were Dr. Mher Sahakyan (China-Eurasia Council for
Political and Strategic Research, Armenia), Asst. Prof.-Dr. Hamidreza
Azizi, (Shahid Beheshti
University, Iran, Research Fellow, Institute for Iran-Eurasia Studies), Assoc.
Prof.-Dr. Gohar Iskandaryan (Leading Specialist, Institute of Oriental Studies
National Academy of Sciences, Armenia), Adlan Margoev, (“Russia and
Nuclear Nonproliferation” Program Director at PIR Center, PhD Candidate at
MGIMO University), Vazgen Petrosyan (Advisory Board Member, “China-Eurasia”
Council for Political and Strategic Research), Nairi Hokhikyan (Director, Diplomatic
Foundation of Armenia) and Arvin Khoshnood (Lund University, Sweden).
Scholars and researchers discussed the future of the JCPOA, Russia’s input in
the JCPOA negotiations and concerns over the future of the agreement, China’s
policy on Iranian nuclear issue in the UNSC, Iran-Armenia Relations
after the “Velvet” revolution, Iran-US
relations, prospects of Iran-Armenia railway project, the influence of the
internal situation of Iran on foreign trade, the prospects for Iran’s
membership in EAEU and Its Implications for Tehran-Yerevan Relations and other
questions.
2019 March 12 “China-Eurasia”
On the initiative of the political and strategic council, “Iran and changing” was held
world order” seminar, during which they gave a speechScientific Commission of the Austrian Armed Forces
Chairman of the Strategic and Security Policy Advisory Committee,
Advisor to the International Peace Institute, professor at the University of Vienna, ք․գ․դ․ Heinz Gjartner, “China-Eurasia” Political and Strategic
Head of Research Council, Chinese Studies Association of Great Britain
member, c.g. Mher Sahakyan, docent from Shahid Beheshti University of Iran,
Hamidreza Aziz, leading researcher of the Institute of Oriental Studies, associate professor, Ph.D. Gohar Iskandaryan, PIR of Russia
Adlan Margoev, Director of the Center “Russia and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Program”,
China-Eurasia Political and Strategic Research Council
Vazgen Petrosyan, a member of the Board of Trustees, a researcher at Lund University in Sweden
Arvin Khoshnud and the director of “Diplomatic Foundation of Armenia” Nairi Khokhikyan։During the seminar, the prospects of Iran’s accession to EAEU and its prospects were discussed
applicability in Tehran-Yerevan relations, which took place in Armenia
The “velvet revolution” and the vision of Armenian-Iranian relations, Actions
the future of the joint comprehensive program, China’s role in the Iran nuclear issue,
Russia’s contribution to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
in negotiations and concerns about its future, US-Iran
relations 40 years after the revolution, Iran-Armenia railway project
prospects, the negative impact of the domestic political situation in Iran
on foreign trade of the country and other issues. During the seminar, an active discussion took place
discussion and exchange of opinions.“China-Eurasia”
Head of the Political and Strategic Research Council, Mher Sahakyan
stated that it is necessaryscience
to make available to the society, and the results of the researches to be practical,
from which the state, science, and society will benefit. And?
China-Eurasia Political and Strategic Research Council, too
ready using connections with foreign scientific centers:
To organize similar discussions in Armenia in the future. He thanked Armenians and foreigners
colleagues who expressed their willingness in this difficult situation
rethink Iran’s role in the changing world order and try to find an Armenian one as well
the interest.
Scholars from Armenia,
Austria, Iran, Russia and
Sweden Discussed Iran’s Role in the Changing World Order
, Yerevan, Armenia- leading
scholars from Armenia, Austria, Iran, Russia and Sweden were invited by the “China-Eurasia” Council for Political and Strategic Research,
foundation to introduce their research on Iran’s role in the changing world
order and Iran-Armenia relations. The key note speaker of this academic seminar
was Univ.- Prof. Dr. Heinz Gärtner (International Institute for Peace and
University of Vienna, Chair of the Advisory Committee
for Strategy and Security Policy of the Scientific Commission at the Austrian
Armed Forces). Among speakers were Dr. Mher Sahakyan (China-Eurasia Council for
Political and Strategic Research, Armenia), Asst. Prof.-Dr. Hamidreza
Azizi, (Shahid Beheshti
University, Iran, Research Fellow, Institute for Iran-Eurasia Studies), Assoc.
Prof.-Dr. Gohar Iskandaryan (Leading Specialist, Institute of Oriental Studies
National Academy of Sciences, Armenia), Adlan Margoev, (“Russia and
Nuclear Nonproliferation” Program Director at PIR Center, PhD Candidate at
MGIMO University), Vazgen Petrosyan (Advisory Board Member, “China-Eurasia”
Council for Political and Strategic Research), Nairi Hokhikyan (Director, Diplomatic
Foundation of Armenia) and Arvin Khoshnood (Lund University, Sweden).
Scholars and researchers discussed the future of the JCPOA, Russia’s input in
the JCPOA negotiations and concerns over the future of the agreement, China’s
policy on Iranian nuclear issue in the UNSC, Iran-Armenia Relations
after the “Velvet” revolution, Iran-US
relations, prospects of Iran-Armenia railway project, the influence of the
internal situation of Iran on foreign trade, the prospects for Iran’s
membership in EAEU and Its Implications for Tehran-Yerevan Relations and other
questions.
2019 March 12 “China-Eurasia”
On the initiative of the political and strategic council, “Iran and changing” was held
world order” seminar, during which they gave a speechScientific Commission of the Austrian Armed Forces
Chairman of the Strategic and Security Policy Advisory Committee,
Advisor to the International Peace Institute, professor at the University of Vienna, ք․գ․դ․ Heinz Gjartner, “China-Eurasia” Political and Strategic
Head of Research Council, Chinese Studies Association of Great Britain
member, c.g. Mher Sahakyan, docent from Shahid Beheshti University of Iran,
Hamidreza Aziz, leading researcher of the Institute of Oriental Studies, associate professor, Ph.D. Gohar Iskandaryan, PIR of Russia
Adlan Margoev, Director of the Center “Russia and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Program”,
China-Eurasia Political and Strategic Research Council
Vazgen Petrosyan, a member of the Board of Trustees, a researcher at Lund University in Sweden
Arvin Khoshnud and the director of “Diplomatic Foundation of Armenia” Nairi Khokhikyan։During the seminar, the prospects of Iran’s accession to EAEU and its prospects were discussed
applicability in Tehran-Yerevan relations, which took place in Armenia
The “velvet revolution” and the vision of Armenian-Iranian relations, Actions
the future of the joint comprehensive program, China’s role in the Iran nuclear issue,
Russia’s contribution to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
in negotiations and concerns about its future, US-Iran
relations 40 years after the revolution, Iran-Armenia railway project
prospects, the negative impact of the domestic political situation in Iran
on foreign trade of the country and other issues. During the seminar, an active discussion took place
discussion and exchange of opinions.“China-Eurasia”
Head of the Political and Strategic Research Council, Mher Sahakyan
stated that it is necessaryscience
to make available to the society, and the results of the researches to be practical,
from which the state, science, and society will benefit. And?
China-Eurasia Political and Strategic Research Council, too
ready using connections with foreign scientific centers:
To organize similar discussions in Armenia in the future. He thanked Armenians and foreigners
colleagues who expressed their willingness in this difficult situation
rethink Iran’s role in the changing world order and try to find an Armenian one as well
the interest.
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
HAR_0013_resize.JPG
JPEG image
ArmInfo.Activists of the civil movement in the name of saving “Karahunj” are waiting for a decision from the government in connection with the “barbaric” excavations in the territory of cultural heritage. Such a statement was made by activists of the civil movement in the name of saving a unique historical monument, the oldest observatory “Karahunj”, speaking of the fate of the oldest observatory “Zorats-Karer”.
To note, the civil movement formed in defense of “Karahunj”, whose members are various organizations and individuals, demand to stop the excavations in “Karahunj” and pass this heritage to the next generations, and in the future to carry out excavations only when it is possible to carry them out using modern equipment and participation of foreign experts.
The activists call on the country’s authorities to punish and prevent further destructive actions being carried out by the head of the archaeological expedition “Zorats Karer”, scientific secretary of the Historical Environment Protection Service of the Ministry of Culture of Armenia Ashot Piliposyan.
In their publication, activists called upon journalists and all those who are interested in what happened at the observatory of the “Zorats-Karer” (Karahunj) Historical and Cultural Reserve to go to the government building to present a description of the incident, and also send a request – a letter of demands to the Prime Minister, thereby strengthening their constructive steps and position.
According to activists, Piliposyan barbarously carries out excavations with the help of heavy and other equipment, which leads to the devaluation of an ancient cultural, historical and scientific monument that has existed for at least 7500 years. Piliposyan’s actions are interpreted by activists as anti-Armenian activities aimed at distorting Armenian history, falsifying it for the sake of personal professional ambitions, aggressively interfering with the stories of tour guides and refuting the well-known version of “Karahunj” as the oldest observatory, claiming “Karahunj” is just a cemetery. Thus, doubting the version of the famous world-renowned scientist, radio astronomer, creator of the unique radio-optical telescope of academician Paris Heruni about “Karahunj”, as an observatory, which was proved by four independent scientific methods and confirmed by many foreign experts. However, Ashot Piliposyan, in turn, said that the excavations here will be continued in order to clarify once and for all the purpose of this monument, overgrown with all sorts of legends. To recall, “Karahunj” or as it is also called The huge megalithic complex “Karahunj” is located in the south of Armenia, near the town of Sisian, on a mountain plateau located at an altitude of 1,770 meters above sea level. This mysterious structure covers an area of about seven hectares and is a circle formed by hundreds of large vertical stones. Interestingly, the location of the “Karahunj” stones almost completely repeats the pattern that forms the Chinese pyramids on the ground. And from the height you can see that the stones in the center of “Karahunj” schematically repeat the constellation Cygnus, that is, a certain star corresponds to each stone. The adherents of this hypothesis are sure that there existed a certain highly developed civilization, which thus perpetuated the atlas of the starry sky compiled by it in stone.
ArmInfo.Soldier Karen Karapetyan, born in 2000, died from a gunshot wound in a military unit in the northern direction of the Artsakh Defense Army on March 12, at about 06:50 am under unexplained circumstances.
Artsakh Armed Forces told ArmInfo that the investigation is underway.
Khachkars (cross stones) dating back to the 11-13th centuries has been discovered in Drmbon community of Martakert, Artsakh.
The cross stones were found near the chapel and cemetery of Drmbon by the head of Martakert Regional Service, Avetik Aghabekyan, Artsakhpress reported.
No other details were immediately available.
The first-ever show in Turkey of artwork by the late Armenian filmmaker Sergei Parajanov illustrates both the challenges and necessity of cultural exchange across closed borders.
More than 45,000 art lovers have visited the show since it opened in December at Istanbul’s Pera Museum, one of Turkey’s most important cultural institutions. It brought 76 works of art – including collages, storyboards, costumes, drawings and photographs – from the Sergei Parajanov Museum in Yerevan, making it the largest overseas exhibition of the museum’s collection.
It pulled this off despite the lack of formal diplomatic ties between Turkey and Armenia, bitterly divided for a quarter century since Ankara closed its frontier in 1993 to protest Armenia’s occupation of Nagorno Karabakh and show support for its close ally Azerbaijan. An older wound also bedevils the relationship: The forced displacement of Armenians living in Ottoman Turkish lands during World War I wiped out a millennia-old culture, and Armenians, as well as most historians, say the massacres were genocide. Turkey denies they were systematically orchestrated.
Yet interactions between artists, businesspeople and civil society groups continue. Now, the Pera introduces Turkey to Parajanov, a master of 20th century cinema who was also a prolific plastic artist. The show runs through March 17 to coincide with what would have been Parajanov’s 95th birthday in January.
“Art is the shortest way to reach somebody’s heart,” said Zaven Sargsyan, director of the Sergei Parajanov Museum, who curated the show at the Pera. “This is a chance for Turkish people to get to know Armenians. It is unfortunate that they don’t hear the names of Armenians here. But we are making the connection with this show.”
Called “Parajanov With Sarkis,” the show is actually a duo exhibition with one of Turkish contemporary art’s most important and original voices. At age 80, Sarkis, who is of Armenian descent, continues to create art in his Paris studio that explores themes of remembrance, displacement and identity, and he credits Parajanov as a seminal influence.
Sarkis’ work occupies the top floor of the Pera and is pure homage to Parajanov. The director’s signature in the Armenian script is rendered in neon lights, his photograph is embellished with water color and stained glass, and a sculpture of wood, fabric and VHS film is called “Portrait of Parajanov.”
“My installations have always been in conversation with other artists, philosophers, musicians and filmmakers, but Parajanov holds a separate place for me,” Sarkis said in an interview, estimating he has watched Parajanov’s films more than 100 times. “In his work, and in mine, there is a confluence of cultures. For example, he uses Azeri, Georgian, Armenian and Turkish languages in his films. This blend of identities informs my work as well.”
Born in Tbilisi in 1924, Parajanov was fascinated by the swirl of cultures of Transcaucasia. The Georgian capital was still home to a large Armenian community while Parajanov studied music and dance at the Tbilisi Conservatory before enrolling at VGIK, the Moscow film school.
His early films were state-backed genre movies, but seeing Andrei Tarkovsky’s “Ivan’s Childhood” in 1962 triggered Parajanov to disavow his earlier work and pursue his own vision. Subsequent films contain highly stylized acting and painterly mise-en-scenes that maximize the color saturation of Soviet-era film stock, making everything appear lurid and fantastical.
Costume for the Ashik Kerib, 1988
While his distinctive poetic ideals earned him accolades from maestros like Federico Fellini and Jean-Luc Godard, back home it raised suspicions about his political leanings as he defied the state-sanctioned art of socialist realism.
Parajanov’s elaborate costume designs stand alone as works of art, and some are on display at the Pera, including a kaftan made of patchwork squares from Oriental rugs that appeared in 1988’s “Ashik Kerib,” based on an Azeri fairy tale. It was the last film Parajanov completed.
Sarkis hangs his own robe, adorned with children’s garments and trimmed with fairy lights, directly one floor above Parajanov’s kaftan. It dangles over a room blanketed with Caucasian kilim rugs and punctuated with vintage television sets playing scenes from Parajanov’s surrealist masterpiece, “The Color of Pomegranates.”
The 1968 biopic of the great 18th century Armenian poet Sayet Nova is a lyrical, avant-garde meditation on color and composition. But the Soviet censors saw the religious and ethno-nationalist iconography of “The Color of Pomegranates” as evidence of Parajanov’s subversive streak and sent him to a gulag for four years following his arrest on trumped-up sex-crime charges in 1973.
Self-Portrait in Istanbul, 1989 (photo: Ara Güler)
Art that Parajanov made in his prison cell – with ball-point pens, nail polish, magazine clippings and metal scraps – is on display at the Pera. After leaving prison, he was banned from making movies and dedicated himself to other artistic pursuits, including the transformation of everyday objects like a leather suitcase into an elephant’s head and kitchen chairs into mosaic-clad baroque objects, also in the show. “When he wasn’t allowed to make films, he had to find new ways to express himself,” Sargsyan said in an interview.
Another stint in prison in 1982 ruined Parajanov’s health, and he died eight years later at the age of 66. He had only recently returned to filmmaking amid the thaw of glasnost, and a year before his death, Parajanov visited Turkey to receive a jury prize from the Istanbul Film Festival for “Ashik Kerib.”
After the Istanbul screening, he reportedly faced intimidation for comments he made about Karabakh. The exhibition includes four works Parajanov created while in Istanbul.
Both Parajanov’s artwork and his films skirt the line between truth and the unreal; for the filmmaker, that line was always blurred. In a 1988 interview ahead of “Ashik Kerib’s” premiere, Parajanov said: “I ask, ‘Did I make it up or is it the truth?’ Everyone says, ‘It’s made up.’ No, it’s simply the truth as I perceive it.”
Ayla Jean Yackley is a journalist based in Istanbul.
“After scoring and assisting in successive games, it’s no surprise that Henrikh Mkhitaryan has been named as our February Player of the Month,” said Arsenal official website.
After being out for weeks due to injury, the Armenian midfielder caught the eye with good performances and gained 40% of votes in the Arsenal poll. Alexandre Lacazette and Bernd Leno finished second and third respectively.