Is there a place for Islam in Mikhael Saakashvili’s Christian Georgi

Caucaz.com, Georgia
Aug 6 2005

Is there a place for Islam in Mikhael Saakashvili’s Christian Georgia? [INVESTIGATION]

By Bayram BALCI in Tbilisi, Batumi, Marneuli, Pankisi

(Translated by Sophie LANCASTER, Cristina PROIETTI and Victoria BRYAN)

Whatever their denomination, Georgian Muslims are finding it harder
and harder to recognise the new national ideology, put into place
by the Saakashvili regime. Over the coming years, their lack of
identification with a State which has clearly affirmed its attachment
to Christian values is likely to weaken further the understanding
between the strongly Muslim provinces and districts and the capital,
which has already had problems establishing itself.

A three-part investigation

© Bayram Balci

Should Islam in Georgia fear being marginalised? [ 1/3 ] At the
centre of the new national ideology in Georgia, whether in Tbilisi,
in the Kvemo Kartli region, where the majority of the population is
Shiite Azeri, and in Ajaria, despite the ‘Christianisation’ which
has taken place since independence, the Georgian Church has existed
alongside a Georgian variant of Islam that has been present in the
country since the start of the Muslim Conquest.

The day after his accession to power, Georgian President Mikhael
Saakashvili adopted a new national flag, clearly demonstrating the
commitment of the political regime to Christian values. The Five
Crosses (of King David) on this new flag are there to signify that
the country wants to resume links with its Christian past and that
it wants to put Christian spirituality in the centre of its national
construction. The crucial role of the Church in the history of Georgia,
which was one of the first States to adopt Christianity as an official
religion after Armenia, explains for the most part why, after 70 years
of militant atheism under the USSR, and since its independence, the
State has reintroduced Christianity. In the 19th century, after all
did not the Georgian nationalists centre themselves round the motto
“Language, fatherland and (Christian) faith”?

However, Islam is well-established in Georgia today. This Georgian
variety is also present in the Kvemo Kartli region, where the
population is mainly Shiite Azeri and also in Ajaria where Islam still
exists, despite the imposition of Christianity since independence.

Georgia also has other Muslim regions: a small minority in Abkhazia,
as well as 12,000 Kistins (related to the Chechens) in the Pankisi
valley, practice Georgian Islam, but their lack of numbers has not
allowed them any influence, as was true for the Meskhet Muslims, of
whom only a small minority could return the country after many years
of forced migrations between central Asia and the Russian federation.

The Islamisation of the country

Islam came to what is now known as Georgia at the start of the Arab
Conquest. From the 8th century the country became an Arab Emirate.

However, in 1122 things changed when King David IV seized Tbilisi to
make the capital into a Christian State.

The development of Islam in the country is the work of two regional
Muslim powers, the Safavid Empire of Iran and the Ottomans, which
established themselves somewhat successively, somewhat simultaneously,
on the current territory of Georgia. The Safavid domination caused
the migration of Turkish tribes in the region, leading to an in-depth
Islamisation of certain areas, in particular Kvemo Kartli and it’s
surrounding villages. The implementation of Islam in Ajaria was
carried out differently – it started later and was more superficial.

>>From the 19th century the obliteration of the two Muslim powers,
Safavid and Ottoman, in the face of Christian Russia of the Tsars
weakened Islam throughout Georgia without totally eradicating it.

Imperial Russian Politics in the Caucasus, as in other regions
populated with Muslims, oscillated between tolerance and orthodox
proselytism.

Perestroika and the winds of religious freedom

In the Soviet era, the ideological atheism of the national power
worked to crush all the religions present in the USSR, Islam in
particular. However, from 1944 onwards this anti-religious policy
was relaxed.

One of the four Departments for Spiritual Affairs for the Soviet
Union was founded at Baku. All of the Muslims of Georgia, both Sunni
and Shiite, depend on it. The perestroika allows greater religious
freedom which benefits not only the Church, but also all other
elements of Georgian Islam. Since the break-up of the Soviet Union,
links have developed between Islam at a local level and foreign
Islamic organisations, particularly those of Iran and Turkey.

In the absence of reliable statistics, it is difficult to give
accurate figures regarding the number of Muslims present in Georgia
today. However, a relatively impartial study suggests 640,000 were
present in 1989, equivalent to 12% of the total population. It would
seem that the trend is in decline due to a considerable migratory
phenomenon taking place among certain Muslim populations, above
all amongst the Azeris, candidates for expatriation to Russia for
financial reasons or to Azerbaijan for family reasons.

The Georgian Meskhets, an insignificant influence today

As well as the two main Muslim communities in Georgia – the Ajarians
and the Azeris – there are also other small Muslim ethnic groups. The
Meskhets, a group with hazy ethnic boundaries between ‘Turkism’ and
‘Georgianism’, constituted one of the essential elements of Islam
in Georgia up until World War II. Situated in the south-west of the
country, in the province of Meskhetia (Akhaltshikhe for the Ottomans),
this Turkist minority was subject to a massive deportation by Stalin
in 1944 (approximately 100,000 people) as he feared the possibility
that they would collaborate with the Germans or with the Turks,
their potential allies.

The Meskhets who define themselves as ‘Ahiska Turkleri’ (the Turks
from the province of Ahiska, Akhaltsia) have never stopped demanding
their re-entry to their native land from their places of deportation
(Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan). Since the perestroika, and
especially in the aftermath of ethnic confrontations between Uzbeks
and Meskhets in the town of Ferghana, the Meskhets have demanded
their right to return even more insistently.

The nationalist government of Zvia Ghamsakourdia, like that of Eduard
Shevardnadze, his successor, refused to satisfy these demands for
reasons that are, at the same time, political, nationalist and
geopolitical.

If a handful of families has been granted the right to return to
Georgia, fewer still have been authorised to reside in the historical
region of Meskhetia, whereas the great majority of these Sunni Meskhets
have been settled in Russia and in Azerbaijan. Fearing an excessively
violent reaction by the Georgians inhabiting the Meskhet villages
that were evacuated in 1944, the Georgian government has endeavoured
to block any efforts made by Meskhet associations, who are insisting
militantly on the repatriation of the historic land. It is because
of this that in Georgia the fraction of Meskhet Islam is virtually
insignificant, unlike the relatively dynamic form of Islam of the
Meskhets settled in Azerbaijan and Russia.

Abkhaz Islam hopes for a revival

Another minority Muslim group, the Abkhazians, live scattered
throughout the secessionist region of Abkhazia and in other Georgian
towns. They were in part converted to Islam throughout the 17th and
18th centuries under the Ottoman domination.

Starting in the 1860s with the Ottoman regression and faced with the
Russian progression in the Caucasus, a large part of the Abkhazian
Muslims (like Muslims from other minorities in the Caucasus) emigrated
south to the Ottoman towns.

During the Soviet period, Abkhazian Islam became weaker, but it would
seem that since the fall of the USSR, the establishment of links
between Abkhazians of Georgia and descendants of Abkhazian immigrants
in Turkey has somewhat favoured an Islamic revival.

When the Kistins of Pankisi suffer the disastrous effects of the war
in Chechnya

Another minority is Kistin Islam, an ethnic minority that belongs
to the Vainakh group and is therefore very close to the Chechens and
the Ingushetians.

Established in the Pankisi valley, in the North-East of Georgia,
for quite some time, this community of around 12,000 people has been
significantly shaped by Islamic brotherhoods, particularly that of
Qadiriyya (introduced by the famous Kunta Hadji in the 19th century)
and that of Nakshbandia (introduced into Kistin villages by an Azeri
mystic called Isa Efendi in 1909).

The Islam of the Kistins has been suffering for dozens of years from
the disastrous effects of the war which pits the Chechen freedom
fighters against the might of the Russian army. The worsening of
the Chechen conflict, which has radicalised Chechen Islam and led to
an influx of refugees into Pankisi has placed a lot of pressure on
the Kistins.

It is thought that it is this combination of factors that has led to
a new radicalisation taking root amongst the Kistins. This strain is
often wrongly referred to as ‘wahhabism’ but it is more complex than
many people realise.

Suspecting that certain Chechen freedom fighters have taken refuge
in the Kistin villages of the Pankisi valley, the Russian federal
government regularly threatens the Georgian government with intervening
on its soil to neutralise groups of fighters. Highly isolated in
its valley, Kistin Islam has very little contact with other forms
of Islam, such as those predominant forms that can be found amongst
Ajarians and Azeris in Georgia.

Madrasas in Georgia!

Throughout the whole of the Soviet era, Islam schooling for Muslims
across the Soviet Union was possible in two towns – Bukhara and
Tashkent, which are famous for their madrasas [Islamic schools].

Today, the majority of Islamic executives who are over 40 were
schooled there.

In Georgia, under the USSR, Muslims also went to Central Asia to
benefit from an Islamic schooling. However, in parallel to these
official (and therefore monitored) places, informal establishments
existed. These were smaller and were mainly found in places of
pilgrimage and small, undeclared mosques. In this way, some religious
elders had small circles of students, often no more than 10, who they
schooled in a unofficial fashion.

Following independence, in the countries where there is a grand
tradition of Muslim culture, such as Uzbekistan, Tadjekistan or
Azerbaijan, madrasas and Islamic universities began to spring up.

In Azerbaijan, a faculty of theology aimed at Turkish Sunnis and an
Islamic university with Iranian Shiite leanings were set up after the
country had gained independence. These establishments attract students
from all over the Caucasus, including from Georgia. But this does not
necessarily mean that it is impossible to receive an Islamic education
in Georgia. Although minor and not widespread, there are small madrasas
where it is possible to receive a good quality Islamic education.

Aside from Turkish movements and Iranian bases installed in
Azeri-speaking regions, which offer basic Islamic education, there is
a small faculty of theology in Tbilisi which was founded by a charity
foundation from Iran, linked to the Iman foundation. Similarly,
in the small village of Kosali, which is on the Azeri-Georgian
border 30km from Marneuli, a small Turkish madrasa has been set up
by Nakchibendi Turks, disciples of Osman Nuri Tobpa, who are mainly
active in Azerbaijan. This madrasa with Sunni leanings also welcomes
Shiite children who are not well informed on the Sunni-Shiite division
and who, because of this, become true Sunnis once they have graduated
from this madrasa.

Sunnis and Shiites living side-by-side but without ever integrating

Although all Islam in the country is regulated by the same
administration (the central mosque of Tbilisi which is the
responsibility of Hadji Ali, who has been designated by the Sheikh ul
Islam of Baku, Allahshukur Pachazadeh), two ‘Islams’ and therefore
two Muslim communities co-exist de facto in Georgia – Azeris, which
are mainly Shiite, and Ajarians, which are mainly Sunni. Links
between these two communities are virtually non-existent, with the
exception of a few devotees who occasionally pray together in the
central mosque in Tbilisi, which has been designed to allow two
denominations to practise.

This absence of a unified Islam in Georgia means that the two schools
do not have the same demands to make of the central state.

The demands of Shiite Azeris are more economic than religious,
particularly in light of the deterioration of their situation since
the country’s independence. Religious issues are directed to Baku and
the Department of Spiritual Affairs, which in turn delegates problems
from its Azeri Shiite minority to Tbilisi.

On the other hand, Ajarian Muslims, which are not an ethnic minority
like the Azeris, have a different relationship with the Georgian state.

Muslims, but Georgian, they are in a difficult position as the central
state encourages Ajarian Muslims to convert to Christianity, which
is promoted as the “true” religion of Georgians.

The state’s policies on education and identity are obviously aimed
at diffusing Christianity, but it does not get directly involved,
preferring instead proselytism and conversions to the Church.

In a general sense, the main problem today in Georgia, where the
ideology of the new state is based on the past and the country’s
Christian values, is the marginalisation of major parts of the
population that are not Christian.

–Boundary_(ID_x92ASPQ/ozuYtfdNfT3uRQ)–

http://www.caucaz.com/home_eng/breve_contenu.php?id=177

Feast of culture lined up for town

FEAST OF CULTURE LINED UP FOR TOWN
by JAMES JOHNSTON

Evening Gazette
August 5, 2005, Friday

Organisers of the 41st Billingham International Folklore Festival
today promised the most culturally diverse show yet.

The week-long event, which starts tomorrow , is the largest festival
of its kind in the UK and features groups from around the world.

But festival director Joe Maloney says that this year organisers have
gone all out to attract performers from every continent.

An expert panel sat though hundreds of audition tapes to find the
best performers.

Groups from Armenia, Belarus, Cyprus, Ecuador, India, Indonesia,
Russia and Venezuela will all feature at this year’s festival.

He said: “I’m excited by the Venezuelan and Ecuadorian groups, which
are new to us.

“We’ve also got a group from Armenia for the first time in a long
time. It’s going to take four days for them to drive here.”

The 650-capacity outdoor centre arena will hold concerts by all 265
performers taking part in the event. It will also hold the closing
ceremony, which will include a firework display and torchlight
procession on August 13.

The Forum Theatre will be the venue for the International Carousel
Show and a free craft fair organised by Stockton Council, which will
feature domestic and international crafts and run throughout the week.

The Billingham Arms Hotel will host the International Line Dancing
Evening, supported by entertainment from Venezuela, and Bede College
a children’s club and dance classes.

“We hope we’ve picked a set of groups that are exciting and that
people will enjoy,” said Mr Maloney.

* For more information, see our What’sOn supplement tonight or visit
www. billinghamfestival. co.uk

ARKA News Agency publishes bulletin”Indicators of Armenian Banks’ Ac

ARKA NEWS AGENCY PUBLISHES QUARTERLY BULLETIN “INDICATORS OF THE
ARMENIAN BANKS’ ACTIVITY”

ARKA News Agency
Aug 4 2005

YEREVAN, August 4. /ARKA/. ARKA News Agency has published Armenian
Banks’ Activity Indicators quarterly bulletin based on the results
of the 2nd quarter of 2005. The bulletin is made up based on the
uniform financial reports of the banks published in mass media, as
well as additional information provided by the banks. ARKA News Agency
expresses thanks to all the banks, which have provided additional
information on their activity.

The Bulletin includes 75 pages of tables on the banking indicators and
consists of nine main parts, which characterize the banking system:
1. General characteristics of the banks; 2.Assets; 3.

Liabilities; 4. Active and Passive Transactions with non-residents;
5. Capital; 6. Profit/Losses; 7. Cash Flows; 8. Liquidity and
Capitalization; 9. Profitability and Yield Indicators of the Banks.

The Bulletin presents financial state of the Armenian banks in general
and allows to conduct a comparative analysis of their activity.

ARKA News Agency for the first time in Armenia had published the
quarterly bulletin “The Banking Indicators of Armenia” in 1999. A.A.

-0–

ARKA News Agency publishes bulletin “Credit Organizations of Armenia

ARKA NEWS AGENCY PUBLISHES REGULAR ISSUE OF BULLETIN “CREDIT
ORGANIZATIONS OF ARMENIA”

ARKA News Agency
Aug 4 2005

YEREVAN, August 4. /ARKA/. ARKA News Agency has published the regular
issue of the financial-economic bulletin “Credit Organizations of
Armenia” for the 2nd quarter of 2005. This product is published
quarterly based on the reports of the credit organizations (CO)
published in mass media.

The bulletin includes about 20 pages of tables on various indicators
of the COs’ activities. It is composed of 11 main parts: 1. General
Characteristics of Credit Organizations; 2.Assets; 3. Liabilities; 4.

Capital; 5. Profit/Losses; 6. Money Flows; 7. Normative Indicators of
the COs’ Activities; 9. Capitalization; 10. Consolidated indicators
of the COs’ Activity (Summary); 11.Consolidated indicators of the
COs’ Efficiency.

The Bulletin presents financial state of the Armenian COs and allows
to conduct a comparative analysis of their activity. The product also
includes technical and methodological comments to the tables.

ARKA News Agency operates from May 1, 1996 and specializes in
financial, economic and political information. ARKA News Agency has
been publishing the quarterly bulletin “The Banking Indicators of
Armenia” since 1999 and the quarterly bulletin “Credit Organizations
of Armenia” – since March, 2005. A.A. -0–

BAKU: Special announcement by office of prosecutor general ofAzerbai

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT BY OFFICE OF PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF THE AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC
[August 05, 2005, 22:51:55]

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
Aug 5 2005

Despite the Government of Azerbaijan has created every condition
for the upcoming parliamentary elections to be held in a democratic
atmosphere, certain forces are continuing their destructive activities
ignoring the warnings by law-enforcement bodies.

Representatives of various strata of our society and individual
citizens send reports on radical opposition~Rs and its supporters~R
preparing for illegal actions aimed to violate socio-political
stability, create civil confrontation and forcedly change the
constitutional system in the country.

Several facts revealed and unclosed recently confirm the reliability
of the information, and event that the mentioned illegal actions are
being prepared with involvement of Armenia~Rs special services.

It was revealed that Armenia enviously looking at the progress in
Azerbaijan, the country~Rs becoming a regional leader in socio-economic
development and enhancing its international image as a democratic
and stable state, is striving to intensify its destructive activities
against Azerbaijan. In particular, in response to leading states~R and
prestigious international organizations~R insistent demands on fair
solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the Republic of Armenia
demonstrating its destructive stance, resorts to various steps to
find the way out.

In order to cause damage to the forming image of our country as a
democratic state, and undermine its authority and protract the peace
talks on Nagorno-Karabakh problem for uncertain time, the Armenian
party has drawn up a special plan of violation of socio-political
stability in Azerbaijan to achieve a weak and capitulatory forces to
come to power here.

The government of Armenia sets aside large financial resources to
realize the plan major part of which envisages maximum possible use
of Armenians living in other counties. To this end, preference is
given to creating – through persons of Armenian national introduced
by special services into the democratic institutions of the third
countries – links with the forces striving in every possible way to
come to power in Azerbaijan.

The emissaries in those institutions are sent to Azerbaijan, or their
accomplices in our country are invited under various pretexts to the
third countries. Here, they are provided with necessary financial
assistance, and trained special methods to violate socio-political
stability, organize unrest, paralyze vital infrastructures and arouse
discontent among population.

On August 3, member of the youth movement ~SYeni Fikir~T (New Thought)
Osman Muhammed Alimuradov, of his own accord, presented information to
the Office of General Prosecutor to the effect that on the instructions
of the leader of the ~SPopular Front of Azerbaijan Party~T (PFAP)
Ali Kerimli, together with chairman of the movement Ruslan Bashirli
he had been visiting Tbilisi on July 28-29, 2005 to meet with Merabi
Jibutia and Georgiy Ispiryan introduced themselves as representatives
of Georgian democratic forces, and a certain Vardan, who in reality
were officers of Armenia~Rs special services. In addition, he presented
videotape handed to him by those men, and the ticket acknowledging
receiving money by Ruslan Bashirli.

It was found out that in late June – early July 2005, the citizen
of Georgia Merabi Jibutia arrived in Baku in the capacity of
representative of the country~Rs democratic forces. Here, he met with
chairman of the youth movement ~SYeni Fikir~T Ruslan Jalil Bashirli
(born in 1978 in the village of Khanmamedli of Zardab district,
currently is living in Baku). Ruslan Bashirli, for his part, introduced
Merabi Jibutia to PFAP Chairman Ali Kerimli, whereupon they had almost
1-hour one-on-one conversation. In consequence, at the invitation of
Merabi Jibutia, Ruslan Bashirli and Osman Alimuradov visited Tbilisi.

On July 28, Merabi Jibutia met Ruslan Bashirli and Osman Alimuradov
in Tbilisi and placed them at a hotel. On the same day, Merabi made
a feast for Ruslan Bashirli, which was mainly attended by Armenians
living both Armenia and Georgia. On July 29, in a Tbilisi apartment
presented as an office, Ruslan Bashirli and Osman Alimuradov met with
Georgiy Ispiryan and Merabi Jibutia. At the meeting, Georgiy Ispiryan
once again attentively heard out the Ruslan Bashirli~Rs story of
the work he had allegedly carried out for the sake of democracy in
Azerbaijan. Ruslan Bashirli noted the forces he represented acted in
accordance with direct instructions from the U.S. National Democratic
Institute, and that they had allegedly received concrete instruction
from its representatives to conduct a revolution in Azerbaijan. He
added under their patronage, PFAP deputy chairman Fuad Mustafayev
and coordinator of his movement Eni Fikir, Baku citizen Nuriyev Said
Fikrat, (born in 1981) were currently taking special training course
in the Republic of Poland.

Having heard out Ruslan Bashirli, Georgiy Ispiryan noted the necessity
carry our a revolution in Azerbaijan by democratic forces led by
Ali Kerimli and Ruslan Bashirli , and promised that the so-called
democratic forces in Armenia and Georgia would provide every possible
assistance to Ali Kerimli and Ruslan Bashirli, even stating on the
possibility to break the ceasefire for a while to spread panic among
population, anf therefore demonstrate incapability of the authority. In
addition, using abusive language towards Azerbaijan authorities,
Georgiy Ispiryan suggested providing such services as collection
of materials discrediting Azerbaijan~Rs officials, and said it was
important to let Ali Kerimli know about it.

No Ispiryan~Rs language insulting honor and dignity of the Azerbaijani
people wounded Ruslan Bashirli~Rs self-esteem. Conversely, inspired
by those words, he touched on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, stating
proudly that ~Sthe problem will be solved over a glass of cognac and
chocolate if the democratic forces come to power.~T After the parties
came to preliminary agreement on joint struggle against the Azerbaijan
authority, Georgiy Ispiryan handed US $2000 to Ruslan Bashirli, and
got a receipt. They agreed on monthly handing of $2000 to Ruslan
Bashirli, as well as a one-time payment of US $20.000 within the
few next days. Besides, Georgiy Ispiryan suggested – as a gift – to
open fire during one of the opposition~Rs meetings aimed to violate
stability in Azerbaijan that was also approved by Ruslan Bashirli. With
the ~Ssuccessful~T meeting completed, Ruslan Bashirli had his picture
with Georgiy Ispiryan and Merabi Jubutia for keepsake.

Then, Georgiy Ispiryan and Merabi Jubutia brought Ruslan Bashirli and
Osman Alimuradov to one of the Tbilisi saunas, where offered them to
have some fun with local prostitutes. Rejecting the offer, however,
Osman Alimuradov stayed in cafe to wait for Ruslan Bashirli. At this
moment, a certain Vardan, mentioned-above, came up to him and having
introduced himself as officer of the Armenia~Rs special services,
advised their last meeting had been shot by hidden video camera.
Vardan said the $2000 had been given them not as a favor. He added
they would establish closer cooperation with and provide constant
financial assistance to the democratic forces in Azerbaijan, and
warned that in case of avoidance of the cooperation, the video would
be demonstrated on TV-channels. Then, he handed the copy of the tape
to Osman Alimuradov advising him to watch it in Baku.

The ~Sheroism~T shown in Tbilisi by Ruslan Bashirli – who has
constantly pretend to be a messenger of democracy, but has completely
unmasked himself and those he represented by conspiring with Armenia~Rs
special services and sacrificed national interests to money – is
reflected in the newspapers ~SAzadlyg~T (Freedom) and ~SBizim Yol~T
(Our Path), which are mouthpiece of those like him. The papers read
that Ruslan Bashirli allegedly visited Tbilisi to participate in the
international conference and meet with one of the Georgia~Rs renowned
businessmen Georgiy Burjanadze. In fact, however, the man was nobody
else but Georgiy Ispiryan well known to Bashirli himself.

The Office of Prosecutor General has launched a criminal case on
article 278 (actions aimed at forced seize of power, and change
of constitutional system of the state) of the Criminal Code of the
Azerbaijan Republic, and Ruslan Bashirli has been detained as a suspect
of run-up to the above-mentioned actions. Investigation is in progress
to reveal all aspects the case the public will be kept informed.

Istanbul: The Patriarch Says Farewell To Three Consul-Generals

Lraper Church Bulletin 05/08/2005
Contact: Deacon Vagharshag Seropyan
Armenian Patriarchate
TR-34130 Kumkapi, Istanbul
T: +90 (212) 517-0970, 517-0971
F: +90 (212) 516-4833, 458-1365
[email protected]

THE PATRIARCH’S FAREWELL DINNER FOR THREE CONSUL GENERALS

Photos:;NewsCode=N000000800&Lang=ENG

His Beatitude Mesrob II, Armenian Patriarch of Istanbul and All
Turkey, gave a farewell dinner on Monday evening, 1 August 2005, for
three consul generals who are completing their terms of service in
Istanbul: the Belgian Consul General, Thomas Antoine; the USA Consul
General, David Arnett; and the Israeli Consul General, Amira Arnon.
The dinner was held in their honour in the garden of the Patriarchate.

Also taking their places with the evening’s honoured guests at His
Beatitude’s table were the Greek Orthodox Patriarch, His All Holiness
Bartholomeos I, and the Chief Rabbi of Turkey, His Eminence Rav
Ishak Haleva.

Among the evening’s other guests were Bishop Aram Atesyan, Father
Yegise Uckunyan, Father Tatul Anusyan, Father Krikor Damatyan and
spouse, Father Drtad Uzunyan and spouse, Father Athenagoras from the
Greek Patriarchate, Father Ian Sherwood from the Anglican Chaplaincy,
Rev. Benjamin Van Rensburg and spouse from the Dutch Chapel,
Father John Whooley from the English Catholic Church, permanent
representative of the Republic of Armenia to the Black Sea Economic
Cooperation Garen Mirzoyan, Holy Pirgic Hospital Foundation Board of
Directors chairperson Bedros Sirinoglu and spouse, the advisors to
His Beatitude the Patriarch, various foundation officials, diplomatic
representatives, members of the Turkish, Armenian, and foreign press,
and youth.

In his speech His Beatitude the Patriarch praised each of the three
diplomats. He said that in addition to their diplomatic missions
they engaged in humanitarian endeavours and actively engaged in
social functions in our city. His Beatitude invited everyone present
to toast the honour of the three diplomats and said that even though
they are leaving our country, they will find that all hearts and doors
in Turkey will remain open to them. His Beatitude then presented each
of the departing consul generals with a silver ewer made by Armenian
silversmiths in the Grand Bazaar.

Following the speech by His Beatitude, Thomas Antoine, David Arnett,
and Amira Arnon each expressed their feelings and spoke of their
gratitude for this warm farewell event.

Accordionist Yetvart Aris and friends added to the evening’s colour
with their repertoire of Armenian, Turkish, and Western music.

As the guests took their leave of the Patriarch around 11:00, they said
that this reception, held at the headquarters of the Armenian Church
and community in Turkey, would remain with them as an unforgettable
memory.

http://www.lraper.org/main.aspx?Action=DisplayNews&amp
www.lraper.org

BAKU: USA wants more democracy in Azerbaijan – foreign minister

USA wants more democracy in Azerbaijan – foreign minister

ANS TV, Baku
3 Aug 05

[Presenter] Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, who is
in Washington, is expected to deliver a speech in front of members of
the Azerbaijani Trade and Cultural Centre about the economic reforms
in Azerbaijan.

Mammadyarov spoke about Baku’s steps towards democracy at a meeting
with Condoleezza Rice at the US State Department. Following the
meeting, Mammadyarov told journalists that they had talked about the
role of the USA as a member of the OSCE Minsk Group in the Nagornyy
Karabakh problem.

[Correspondent, over video of Mammadyarov-Rice meeting] During the
meeting with Condoleezza Rice, Mammadyarov mainly spoke about the
Nagornyy Karabakh problem. The USA, which is the member of the OSCE
Minsk Group, has made known its position on a peaceful solution of
the issue once again.

[Mammadyarov] It was a very good and wide-ranging discussion. We
discussed bilateral US-Azerbaijani relations. We, above all, discussed
the ways of a speedy and peaceful solution to the Azerbaijani-Armenian
Nagornyy Karabakh conflict.

[Correspondent] Another issue discussed by Mr Mammadyarov with the
US secretary of state was Azerbaijan’s moves towards democracy. Rice
personally informed the Azerbaijani foreign minister of the problems
in the sphere of democracy [in Azerbaijan].

[Mammadyarov] We generally talked about democracy. We said that good
and comprehensive relations have been built up between Azerbaijan and
the USA and, of course, the USA would like the democratic process in
Azerbaijan be expanded. From this point of view, we also discussed the
[November parliamentary] election, which is an important factor.

[Correspondent] They also talked about economic and regional
projects. Rice and Mammadyarov discussed the transportation of energy
resources from the Caspian basin.

[Mammadyarov] We talked about some economic projects, including the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan [oil pipeline], the project which has already
been implemented. We also talked about the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum [gas
pipeline] and the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway projects. I also noted that
these are important projects for Azerbaijan in terms of energy. We
also talked about international organizations and Azerbaijani-US
cooperation. In general, I am very happy about the meeting.

[Correspondent] Mr Mammadyarov will hold meetings at the White
House and the Pentagon. During his visit which will continue until
5 August, he will also attend meetings organized by the National
Democratic Institute, International Republican Institute and IFES
[the International Foundation for Election Systems].

Armenian official upbeat on cooperation with Georgia in ethnic regio

Armenian official upbeat on cooperation with Georgia in ethnic region

Ayots Ashkar, Yerevan
2 Aug 05

Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Markaryan has recently visited
Javakhk where together with his Georgian counterpart they discussed
and identified a number of problems connected with joint investments
in this Armenian-populated region of Georgia. The prime minister’s
adviser and deputy chairman of the “Powerful Motherland” party,
Stepan Markaryan, commented on this.

[Correspondent Ayots Ashkar] Mr Markaryan, joint programmes will be
implemented in Javakhk. Is there a guarantee that the Georgian party
will fulfil its obligations?

[Markaryan] There is no guarantee, as no agreement was signed. But the
attitude of the present-day Georgian authorities toward the matter
and the general impression from their working style inspire hope
for a positive outcome. Armenia expressed readiness to take part in
improving the situation in Javakhk, in particular in the humanitarian
sphere. I mean, supplies of textbooks and provision of support for
schools, cultural centres and the health service system.

The Georgian side intends to provide the main bulk of aid in 2007, when
it will receive money from the USA under the millennium programme. They
propose to invest a total 120m US dollars in Javakhk, in particular
for restoring the roads leading to the Armenian border.

I think it is important that the Georgian side responded positively
to our proposal to set up an Armenian-Georgian University in
Akhalkalak. We hope that a relevant agreement will be signed in the
near future.

[Correspondent] What is the situation in the health service system?
There are reports that the Georgian side is implementing a doctors’
training course and that Armenian doctors who do not know the Georgian
language are to be dismissed.

[Markaryan] There are two district hospitals in Akhalkalak and
Ninotsminda. The situation in the Akhalkalak hospital is better. But
on the whole the system is ruined and needs serious investments. I
am not aware of this information regarding the doctors’ training,
but I do not think that the Georgians will dismiss doctors who do
not know the language. There are not enough doctors in the region
and they require more, as well as medical equipment. The Armenian
side said it was ready to help with equipment as much as it can.

[Correspondent] Don’t you find the policy of the present Georgian
government different from that of the previous one?

[Markaryan] In general, at Shevardnadze’s time there was also a
positive attitude towards our initiatives. But all our arrangements
remained on paper. Agreements were made even at the presidential level,
but everything got stuck in the middle at the medium and low official
levels. There was a special type of Georgian functionaries with false
sense of patriotism who hindered the initiatives because they thought
this benefited their country, although results differed. Actually,
we notice the approach of today’s authorities of Georgia and their
ideological difference. That is to say, they admit the problems and
the need to resolve them. Whether they have a potential to settle
them is another matter. For this reason they are very careful in
their statements, thus they did not promise much during the last
meeting. They just said that some major investments and changes are
expected in 2007.

The process has begun

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
August 1, 2005, Monday

THE PROCESS HAS BEGUN

SOURCE: Vremya Novostei, July 29, 2005, p. 5

by Mikhail Vignansky

THE FIRST COLUMN OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT LEAVES THE RUSSIAN MILITARY
BASE IN BATUMI

Today, the first column of military equipment is to leave the Russian
military base in Batumi. It consists of nine staff automobiles of the
12th Russian military base in Adzhariya and two convoy automobiles.
Under own power the equipment will start for Vladikavkaz. “So, it can
be said we begin the process of withdrawal of our bases”, said to
‘Vremya Novostei’ Deputy Commander of the Group of Russian Troops in
Transcaucasia, Colonel Vladimir Kuparadze. The withdrawal of bases
was set by the joint announcement of the foreign ministers of Russia
and Georgia on May 30.

Yesterday, from the 62nd military base in Akhalkalki to the 102nd
Russian military base in Armenia, the Russian military tried to move
radiation-chemical-biological defense machines. Mr. Kuparadze
specifically highlighted that, that was not the beginning of
withdrawal of Russian military bases from Georgia, but that was
removal of excessive equipment the Russian base, which had begun long
before the conclusion of the agreement by the foreign ministers.

Georgian frontiersmen detained the column. There turned out to be too
much “excesses” – frontiersmen found out that the Russian military
had no document for a machine-gun and several signal pistols. “We
explained that they comprised a component part of the armament
complex of fighting reconnaissance patrol machines (BRDM). We were
asked for additional documents, and we will deliver them. The
commander of the 62nd military base in Akhalkalki have already
prepared them”, said Vladimir Kuparadze. In several hours, the column
set on moving again.

The next stage will be withdrawal of about 40 tanks and other armored
equipment from the base in Batumi on August 5-10. Large landing ships
from the Black Sea Fleet will arrive for them. The 12th base must be
liquidated by 2008. As for the 62nd military base in Akhalkalki which
must be liquidated by the end of 2007, Russia asks Georgia to prepare
bridges on the route, as in their present state they won’t bear heavy
armored equipment. On the Russian bases in Georgia, there are now 115
tanks, 220 land troops fighting machines and armored troop carriers,
and 170 artillery systems.

Translated by Tatiana Khramtsova

ANKARA: Turkey protests Switzerland’s detention of Perincek

Turkish Press
July 29 2005

Press Review

HURRIYET

TURKEY PROTESTS SWITZERLAND’S DETENTION OF PERINCEK

Turkey yesterday filed an official protest of Switzerland’s detention
last week of Turkish Worker’s Party (IP) leader Dogu Perincek for
denying the so-called Armenian genocide. Turkey filed the protest in
both Ankara and Bern. Swiss Ambassador to Ankara Waltre Gyger was
summoned by Foreign Ministry Deputy Undersecretary Nabi Sensoy to the
ministry to receive Ankara’s protest. In addition, Turkish Ambassador
to Bern Alev Kilic went to the Swiss Foreign Ministry to deliver the
protest. `Saying that the incidents of 1915 were not genocide is not
a crime,’ said the protest. `If it was, Switzerland’s stance would
violate the freedom of expression, one of our bedrock rights and
freedoms. Such deplorable treatment of a Turkish citizen threatens to
seriously damage relations between our countries.’ /Hurriyet/