PACE Issues Statement On Recognition And Condemnation Of The Armenia

PACE ISSUES STATEMENT ON RECOGNITION AND CONDEMNATION OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Panorama.am
18:45 29/04/2010

Politics

PACE plenary session issued a statement Thursday on recognition
and condemnation of the Armenian Genocide. The Armenian delegation
to the PACE had initiated a proclamation of a statement condemning
the Armenian Genocide and organized a signature collecting campaign
over it; several dozens of representatives from 15 states joined
the campaign.

"The PACE members having signed the statement call on the PACE members
to take necessary measures to recognize the 1915 Genocide carried out
in the Ottoman Empire to push Turkey into recognizing the Armenian
Genocide, contribute to Armenia-Turkey rapprochement and establishment
of peace in the region," the statement reads.

Having collected more signatures than the 20 needed, the statement
was published not by the PACE President Mevlut Cavusoglu, but the
session-chairing French MP Jean-Claude Mignon, member of the Armenian
delegation to the PACE Naira Zohrabyan informed.

L’Armenie Est A L’Est De L’Anatolie

L’ARMENIE EST A L’EST DE L’ANATOLIE
Jean Eckian

armenews
hp3?id_article=60702
30 avril 2010

l’auteur Rouben Galichian, specialiste de la catographie historique de
l’Armenie, tient a preciser que de nombreux chercheurs font une erreur
grossière en situant l’Armenie Occidentale en "Anatolie de l’Est",
alors qu’elle est a l’Est de l’Anatolie, comme le prouve cette carte
publiee a Constantinople en 1803.

http://www.armenews.com/article.p

Le débat sur le génocide arménien est un enjeu politique majeur

LE DéBAT SUR LE GéNOCIDE ARMéNIEN EST UN ENJEU POLITIQUE MAJEUR
par Vicken Cheterian

Le Temps
f-ba6c-182b64522aed/Le_dï¿~Cï¾ ©bat_sur_le_gï¿~Cᄅ nocide_armï¿~Cᄅnien_est _un_enjeu_politique_majeur
26 Avril 2010
Suisse

Vicken Cheterian, politologue, estime que les événements de 1915
sont loin d’être un simple objet d’histoire, car l’enjeu de ce débat
pèse sur le destin du Haut-Karabagh et de la Turquie elle-même

Pourquoi, 95 ans après, le génocide arménien alimente-t-il encore
les débats parlementaires? Pourquoi est-il la source de tensions
dans les relations internationales? Aujourd’hui, ceux qui nient la
réalité du génocide arménien se font rares. L’argument avancé
pour empêcher sa reconnaissance légale consiste plutôt a admettre
qu’il s’agit certes d’un génocide mais qu’il serait politiquement
inopportun de contrarier la Turquie – membre important de l’OTAN et
partenaire stratégique; ce n’est pas le moment, disent-ils après 95
ans. D’autres estiment que des événements remontant a 1915 devraient
être confiés aux historiens puisqu’ils appartiennent au passé. Ils
se fourvoient. Le génocide arménien est un débat sur des enjeux
politiques contemporains. Les quatre arguments développés ci-dessous
soulignent la portée politique du génocide arménien.

Commencons par la diaspora arménienne, c’est-a-dire les descendants
des survivants du génocide. Les autorités turques persistent a
nier le génocide, prétendent qu’il n’a jamais eu lieu et que si
massacres il y a eu, la faute en incombe aux Arméniens eux-mêmes. Par
cette attitude, la Turquie renforce la mobilisation de la diaspora
arménienne et sa quête de justice et de reconnaissance. Il est
difficile de croire que ces gens vont simplement disparaître,
oublier ou se laisser intimider.

Ils ne trouveront pas la paix tant que la Turquie n’aura pas admis
sa responsabilité dans le génocide de 1915 qui, sous couvert de la
Première Guerre mondiale, a tué ou déporté plus de 2 millions de
personnes qui vivaient dans l’Arménie historique.

L’ombre du génocide continue de planer sur l’équilibre
politique du Caucase. En 1988, lorsque la population arménienne du
Nagorno-Karabakh, qui faisait alors partie de l’Union soviétique, a
exprimé pacifiquement le souhait d’être détachée de l’Azerbaïdjan
soviétique pour être rattachée a l’Arménie soviétique, la
réaction a été violente: moins de trois semaines plus tard, la ville
azérie de Sumgait devenait le théâtre d’un pogrom anti-arménien. Le
message était clair et personne n’a eu besoin d’explications. Les
Arméniens ont compris qu’il s’agissait d’un rappel du génocide de
1915; les Azéris aussi. Le pogrom de Sumgait a été suivi par une
demi-douzaine d’autres, de Ganja (ex-Kirovabad) a Bakou. Â"Si vous
persistez dans vos revendications, attendez-vous a une réplique de
1915Â", disaient en substance les responsables de ces exactions.

Pendant la période de troubles qui a précédé la désintégration
de l’Union soviétique, la menace a refait surface, faisant
écho a la peur. Si la Turquie avait admis sa responsabilité dans
l’anéantissement des Arméniens d’Anatolie, le conflit politique entre
les Arméniens et les Azéris au sujet de la province du Haut-Karabakh
aurait pu être résolu de manière pacifique.

Après l’effondrement de l’Union soviétique, lorsque le conflit du
Haut-Karabakh a dégénérÃ&#xA 9; en guerre ouverte, la Turquie, dont la
population a la même origine ethnique que les Azéris, ne s’est pas
fait prier pour offrir son assistance militaire. Elle a dépêché
sur place armes, munitions et généraux. Les dirigeants turcs ont
même menacé l’Arménie, annoncant qu’ils allaient lui donner une
lecon qu’elle ne serait pas prête d’oublier.

Depuis, la Turquie s’est jointe a l’Azerbaïdjan pour imposer un
blocus a l’Arménie, afin d’étouffer son économie et la forcer a
abandonner son soutien au Haut-Karabakh. Il s’agit de la dernière
frontière a rester fermée depuis la fin de la Guerre froide et le
conflit est loin d’être résolu.

La Turquie, qui porte une responsabilité écrasante dans
l’extermination des Arméniens ottomans, a le devoir de rester au
moins neutre dans le conflit du Haut-Karabakh. Aujourd’hui, les
dirigeants d’Azerbaïdjan continuent de menacer l’Arménie d’une
attaque militaire pour récupérer les territoires perdus lors du
conflit armé des années 90. Si elle reconnaissait le génocide
et adoptait une position neutre dans le conflit du Haut-Karabakh,
la Turquie diminuerait le risque d’une nouvelle guerre du Caucase.

Le troisième argument concerne la Turquie elle-même. Une fois
les Arméniens éliminés, la République turque a continué
a faire preuve d’intolérance vis-a-vis de ses minorités et a
user de violence a leur égard: Kurdes, Assyriens, Grecs, Alevis,
syndicalistes, militants des droits de l’homme. Dans les années 80,
le conflit opposant le régime militaire turc et les guérilleros du
PKK s’est soldé par la destruction d’au moins trois mille villages
kurdes et le déplacement de leurs habitants vers les grandes
villes. Aujourd’hui, ce système a parti unique – le parti militaire
est souvent qualifié a tort de parti Â"laïcÂ" – bat de l’aile et
pourrait céder la place au pluralisme et a la démocratie. Dans ce
contexte, la question arménienne revient sur le devant de la scène
et de nombreux journalistes, écrivains et militants bravent le danger
pour dénoncer les tabous officiels. Certains ont payé leur audace
de leur vie, comme le journaliste Hrant Dink, assassiné devant les
locaux de sa rédaction a Istanbul.

La reconnaissance du génocide arménien par la Turquie constituerait
un immense progrès et permettrait d’effacer la peur et la violence
qui ont marqué la vie politique interne du pays jusqu’a présent.

Mais en fin de compte, la reconnaissance du génocide arménien nous
concerne tous: pouvons-nous vraiment espérer une transformation des
relations internationales et une résolution pacifique des conflits
contemporains si nous préférons ignorer le premier génocide du
XXe siècle, par opportunisme politique?

Le 24 avril, nous avons commémoré le 95e anniversaire du génocide
arménien. Pendant 95 ans, le besoin de justice et de reconnaissance
a été bafoué. Pourtant, évacuer la question du génocide sous
prétexte qu’il s’agit d’histoire et non d’actualité serait une
erreur: ce débat porte sur les enjeux politiques d’aujourd’hui et
il est illusoire de vouloir l’occulter.

L’auteur a publié: War and Peace in the Caucasus, Russia’s Troubled
Frontier, Hurst and Columbia University Press, 2009.

http://www.letemps.ch/Page/Uuid/5058d4a6-50aa-11d

Ankara S’Acharne Sur Leyla Zana

ANKARA S’ACHARNE SUR LEYLA ZANA
Stephane

armenews
29 avril 2010

L’ex-députée au Parlement turc condamnée pour délit d’opinion.

Protestation de Patrick Le Hyaric.

L’histoire se répète pour Leyla Zana, harcelée par le pouvoir
central d’Ankara. L’ancienne députée au parlement turc a été
condamnée a trois ans de prison, le 8 avril dernier, par le tribunal
de Diyarbakir, sa ville natale au sud-est de la Turquie et capitale
du Kurdistan turc.

Il lui est reproché des déclarations de 2008, lors de deux
événements organisés par le Parti démocratique du peuple (DTP)
a Diyarbakir, en faveur des droits démocratiques et de la liberté
d’expression du peuple kurde. Propos aussitôt assimilés a un
éloge du Parti des travailleurs kurdes (PKK). Pour avoir prêté
serment en kurde, en octobre 1991, Leyla Zana alors députée, avait
écopé de quinze ans de prison en 1994. Elle n’avait été remise
en liberté que dix ans plus tard a la suite d’une forte mobilisation
internationale. Depuis, le pouvoir turc n’a laissé que peu de répit
a la lauréate du prix Sakharov pour la liberté de pensée, décerné
par le Parlement européen (1995). Ã~Icartée des législatives de
2007, stigmatisée par les enquêtes â~@¨judiciaires pour avoir prôné
une structure d’état fédéral en â~@¨Turquie permettant aux Kurdes de
jouir d’une autonomie et de tous leurs droits politiques et culturels,
sa nouvelle peine se rajoute a une précédente condamnation a dix
ans prononcée en 2008. Â" C’est une atteinte inacceptable aux droits
de l’homme et aux libertés individuelles.

Militante pacifiste, Leyla Zana a fait preuve d’un engagement constant
pour réconcilier les peuples turc et kurde, malgré les menaces qui
pèsent â~@¨sur elle depuis des années Â", a déclaré Patrick Le
Hyaric, député européen. Le directeur de â~@¨l’Humanité a déja
interpellé Jerzy Buzek, président du Parlement européen, et Bernard
Kouchner, ministre des Affaires étrangères et européennes, afin
qu’ils interviennent auprès des autorités turques pour qu’elles Â"
reviennent sur leur décision Â".

Authorities And Opposition Shield Nalbandian From ARFD

AUTHORITIES AND OPPOSITION SHIELD NALBANDIAN FROM ARFD

news.am
april 28 2010
Armenia

Currently the issue of foreign minister Edward Nalbandian’s change is
not on the agenda, Republican Party of Armenia member Galust Sahakyan
told NEWS.am, commenting on his colleague Vahan Hovhannisyan’s demand
that RA FM resigns due to inefficient work.

According to him, RPA is content with Nalbandian’s work, otherwise
he wouldn’t be holding the office. Sahakyan stated that though these
statements ARFD seeks to garner political dividends, that will not
however affect RPA and leadership’s opinion.

Besides, Heritage party member Armen Martirosyan also ranged himself on
the side of Nalbandian, emphasizing that no avail in ARFD’s attempts
to scapegoat foreign minister, as president is the one liable for
the foreign policy course.

Hrayr Matevosyan Defeats Sembich In Baku

HRAYR MATEVOSYAN DEFEATS SEMBICH IN BAKU

Tert.am
11:18 29.04.10

Armenian boxer Hrayr Matevosyan (60 kg category) defeated Bosnian
Miroslav Sembich in the Youth World Boxing Championship held in the
Azerbaijani capital of Baku.

Earlier another Armenian boxer Arthur Karajyan (64 category) had lost
to his Turkish rival Mohammed Aydin at a 2:9 score.

Thus, in this way it is only Hrayr Matevosyan who will continue his
struggle in the Armenian team.

Among Armenian boxers participating in this championship were Koryun
Soghomonyan (48kg), Narek Abgaryan (51kg), Hovhannes Bachkov, Also
today Karen Tonakanyan (57kg).

There were also two other Armenians participating in this championship
who represented Germany (Araik Marutyan) and Ukraine (Armen Simonyan).

BAKU: Analyst Cory Welt: US Should Call For Yerevan To Pursue A With

Analyst Cory Welt: The United States should call for Yerevan to pursue a withdrawal from Azerbaijani territories in parallel with normalization with Turkey

APA
April 28 2010
Azerbaijan

Washington. Isabel Levine – APA. "The Obama administration’s greatest
mistake in promoting Turkish-Armenian rapprochement was in not pushing
the AKP to be more explicit about whether or not it was really ready to
ratify the protocols without seeing progress on the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict", -told APA’s US correspondent Dr. Cory Welt, Associate
Director of Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at
the Elliott School of International Affairs of the George Washington
University in Washington DC.

According to him, if Washington had pushed the AKP, the US might have
understood that tackling the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was still a
precursor to regional stability, not a potential byproduct of it.

Mr. Welt believes that, the United States should clearly reconsider
its approach to Armenia and join Turkey in calling for Yerevan to
pursue a partial withdrawal from Azerbaijani territories in parallel
with normalization with Turkey: "At this point, however, it is
extremely unlikely that it will be successful in the short-term,
since the Armenian government was encouraged to stake its foreign
policy reputation on achieving rapprochement with Turkey with no
preconditions".

In the meantime, he mentioned that, the United States should turn to
repairing its damaged relationship with Azerbaijan while encouraging
Turkey and Armenia to find less dramatic and more incremental ways
to move forward on normalization.

Armenia Participated In Middle East Food Expo

ARMENIA PARTICIPATED IN MIDDLE EAST FOOD EXPO

news.am
April 28 2010
Armenia

April 26-28 among 30 other states Armenia participated in Middle East
Food Expo in Abu Dhabi’s National Exhibition Centre (ADNEC). On the
initiative of Armenian Embassy in UAE and Armenian Development Agency
the country was presented by Glass World, KonSer, Dilijan Frolova,
Noyan, Eurocup and Euroterm companies.

UAE and Persian Gulf region businessmen showed interest in Armenian
products. Organizers and visitors of the fair emphasized high quality
and competitiveness of Armenian commodities, expressing hope to see
their wide range in further expos as well.

Public TV Of Armenia Goes Worldwide

PUBLIC TV OF ARMENIA GOES WORLDWIDE

Panorama.am
16:30 27/04/2010

Society

>>From April 23, 2010 "Public TV Company of Armenia" CJSC commenced the
retransmission and live-webcast of the programs in the internet. Along
with the satellite broadcast, which covers only the territories
of Europe and North America, our world-spread compatriots have the
opportunity to view the programs of the First Channel at the following
web-link without any territorial
limitations.

The web-version of "Ararat" cultural channel is available at this
very URL .

According to the opinion of "Public TV Company of Armenia" CJSC
Executive Director Mr. Armen Amiryan: "The web-cast of the programs
is important not only in terms that information has availability,
but it has also given our compatriots the opportunity to follow the
news with the eyes of an Armenian viewer. Internet annihilates the
distances and borders."

http://armtv.com/online/eng/?live=1
http://armtv.com/online/eng/?live=2

NK: We are getting ready for war and we need our nation to be united

FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway

The right to believe, to worship and witness
The right to change one’s belief or religion
The right to join together and express one’s belief

========================================== =====
Tuesday 27 April 2010
NAGORNO-KARABAKH: "WE ARE GETTING READY FOR WAR AND WE NEED OUR NATION TO
BE UNITED"

Fines today (27 April) on four Protestants bring to nine the number of
religious believers punished so far for unregistered religious worship in
Nagorno-Karabakh, the internationally unrecognised entity in the south
Caucasus, religious communities have told Forum 18 News Service. More fines
are likely. The fines follow eight police raids on worship services of
Adventists, Evangelical Christians and Jehovah’s Witnesses since February.
"All religious organisations must have registration before they start to
meet – it’s the law," Deputy Police Chief Mkhitar Grigoryan told Forum 18,
without admitting that two of these communities were denied registration.
Karabakh’s religious affairs official Ashot Sargsyan explained to the
Adventists the government’s attitude to smaller religious communities: "We
are getting ready for war and we need our nation to be united".

NAGORNO-KARABAKH: "WE ARE GETTING READY FOR WAR AND WE NEED OUR NATION TO
BE UNITED"

By Felix Corley, Forum 18 News Service <;

"They were raided because they were meeting without registration," a
Nagorno-Karabakh Deputy Police Chief has insisted to Forum 18 News Service.
Mkhitar Grigoryan defended eight police raids on worship services of three
separate religious communities in the internationally unrecognised entity
in the south Caucasus, speaking from the capital Stepanakert on 27 April.
"All religious organisations must have registration before they start to
meet – it’s the law," he asserted. Asked whether the raids were a return to
Soviet-era human rights violations, he laughed and put the phone down.

The chief and deputy chiefs of Stepanakert city police – which conducted
the raids on the Seventh-day Adventists, the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the
Revival Fire Protestant Church in the capital – were not available when
Forum 18 called on 27 April. The duty officer rejected suggestions that the
police had done anything wrong in raiding the communities, but declined to
discuss why the raids had been launched.

Forum 18 reached Ashot Sargsyan, head of the government’s Department for
Ethnic Minority and Religious Affairs, by phone on 27 April, but he said he
could hear nothing as the line was not good and put the phone down.

Karabakh’s Deputy Foreign Minister Vasili Atajanyan told Forum 18 on 27
April that he had heard nothing of any raids and fines on religious
communities. But he insisted that "Nagorno-Karabakh is a democratic state
that respects human rights". "No-one is undergoing persecution," he
claimed. However, he insisted that the authorities have to be wary because
of the threat of renewed war with the Azerbaijani government.

Raids follow restrictive Religion Law

The raids, followed by fines on Protestants and Jehovah’s Witnesses come
just over a year after the entry into force in January 2009 of the entity’s
Religion Law. The Law – heavily based on the Religion Law of neighbouring
Armenia – appears to require registration of religious communities and ban
unregistered religious activity.

Other restrictions include: state censorship of religious literature; the
requirement for 100 adult citizens to register a religious community; an
undefined "monopoly" given to the Armenian Apostolic Church over preaching
and spreading its faith while restricting other faiths to similarly
undefined "rallying their own faithful"; and the vague formulation of
restrictions, making the intended implementation of many articles uncertain
(see F18News 3 November 2009
< e_id=1371>).

Albert Voskanyan of the Stepanakert-based Centre for Civilian Initiatives,
who has long worked for religious freedom, reminded Forum 18 on 27 April
that he had warned of the resumption of penalties for religious activity
when the new Religion Law was adopted. "The next step will indeed be
criminal prosecution," he added.

February raid

The first community to be raided was Stepanakert’s Adventist congregation.
About a dozen police officers arrived on 27 February as the congregation of
some 15 people was nearing the end of its Saturday worship service, Douglas
Hardt, the head of the Adventist Church in Armenia, told Forum 18 from the
Armenian capital Yerevan on 27 April. Police confiscated all the
literature, including about 15 identical copies of the Bible, as well as
CDs and DVDs, saying they needed to check it up. Also taken was all the
offertory money.

Police officers told those present that they should not meet for worship
without state registration and if they did so they would be fined the first
time, then imprisoned. The men present were taken to the police station,
where they were threatened, Hardt added. However, he said no cases against
them under the Code of Administrative Offences were launched.

Hardt said the following few Saturdays (which Adventists mark as their
Sabbath), the community did not meet together for worship. However, he said
that police later returned the literature and the offertory money.

"We need our nation to be united"

Hardt and a colleague from the Adventist Church in Armenia travelled to
Nagorno-Karabakh a month after the raid, and met several officials. On 26
March they met Sargsyan of the Department for Ethnic Minority and Religious
Affairs, who claimed to them that the Religion Law was a "good law". "We
are getting ready for war and we need our nation to be united," Hardt
quoted Sargsyan as telling them. Sargsyan questioned what Hardt – an
American – and his colleague – an Armenian citizen – were doing in
Nagorno-Karabakh.

Hardt said they had also met an official in the government, who had told
them: "We’re all Orthodox [i.e. of the Armenian Apostolic Church], why are
you different?"

However, Hardt added that he was encouraged when they received a telephone
call from the office of Yuri Hairapetyan, the Human Rights Ombudsperson,
who told them that although the Adventists do not have registration, the
law does not provide for religious communities to be punished for meeting
together.

The Adventist congregation has resumed worship services and has not faced
further problems.

Hardt complains that the requirement for 100 adult members makes
registration for their community impossible, as they do not have enough
members.

March raids

Police raided simultaneously six separate Jehovah’s Witness meetings in
Stepanakert on the evening of 30 March, the day worldwide when Jehovah’s
Witnesses marked the Memorial of Christ’s death. Also raided that evening
were meetings in the towns of Shushi near Stepanakert and Askeran north of
Stepanakert.

Local Jehovah’s Witnesses had rented a venue in Stepanakert to hold the
Memorial meeting, Lyova Markaryan, an Armenian Jehovah’s Witness, told
Forum 18 from Stepanakert on 27 April. However, several hours beforehand
the police had banned them from using the venue and they had to meet in
smaller groups in private homes.

Up to 30 police officers took part in the raids in Stepanakert. Markaryan
said two or three Bibles were confiscated with no reasons given. Two men
were taken to the police station where they were photographed and
fingerprinted and not freed until nearly midnight. Officers told them the
meetings were illegal as Jehovah’s Witnesses do not have registration.

Subsequent fines and further cases

Police drew up records of offences under Article 206 of Karabakh’s Code of
Administrative Offences against 19 Jehovah’s Witnesses present at the
commemorations, Markaryan told Forum 18. Article 206 punishes "holding mass
meetings without state permission" with a fine of between 30 and 100
percent of the official monthly minimum wage.

The first to be fined were five Jehovah’s Witnesses in Askeran, who faced
an administrative commission on 19 April. Found guilty of violating Article
206, they were each fined 300 Armenian Drams, the currency in use in
Karabakh (4.5 Norwegian Kroner, 0.58 Euros or 0.77 US Dollars). The five
paid the fines, but are appealing to the Administrative Court.

"It’s not a question of the fines in themselves," Markaryan explained to
Forum 18. "It’s that next time they will face prosecution under the
Criminal Code." He said Sargsyan of the Department for Ethnic Minority and
Religious Affairs has repeatedly told them that for any second "offence"
the Criminal Code will be used. (Although no articles of the Criminal Code
have been specified, Criminal Code penalties are far higher.)

Although 13 people in Stepanakert were due to be punished administratively
under Article 206, two of them – both Russian citizens – have already
returned to Russia. The remaining 11 – ten of whom are being punished for
their presence at the Memorial meeting in Stepanakert, the other in Shushi
– were due to have their cases heard on 27 April. However, Markaryan – who
had been present at the commission that day – told Forum 18 that it had
readily agreed to postpone the hearings until the following week to allow
the Jehovah’s Witnesses to prepare their case.

Markaryan told Forum 18 that the police records of the "offences" against
each of the 11 have not yet been handed over.

On 27 April, one of the 11 awaiting an administrative case in Stepanakert
was detained by police in Shushi for leading a Bible study, Markaryan
added. Police demanded that he write a statement. They drew up a record for
him to face a further administrative hearing under Article 206.

Jehovah’s Witness registration rejected

Markaryan pointed out to Forum 18 that Karabakh’s Jehovah’s Witness
community tried to get registration. It lodged its application in June
2009, but this was rejected by the State Registry in August 2009 after a
negative assessment by Sargsyan of the Department for Ethnic Minority and
Religious Affairs. A Jehovah’s Witness challenge to the denial was rejected
by the General Court of First Instance in Stepanakert in October 2009 (see
F18News 3 November 2009
< e_id=1371>).

The community lodged an appeal to Karabakh’s Supreme Court calling for the
October 2009 judgment to be annulled and obliging the State Registry to
register the community. They argued that the denial of registration
violated their rights under the Karabakh Constitution and international
human rights conventions that Karabakh has unilaterally said it would abide
by. But after a hearing, the three judges headed by Gayane Grigoryan
rejected their suit against the State Registry in a judgment of 28 January,
of which Forum 18 has seen the text.

Appearing in court, State Registry head Sevak Mikaelyan insisted the State
Registry could not be sued in court as it is only a sub-department of the
Justice Ministry which was merely following the expert analysis of the
Department for Ethnic Minority and Religious Affairs. He also argued that
the Jehovah’s Witnesses could not authorise their member Sarkis Avanesyan
to bring the suit as – given that no registered community exists – it could
not therefore authorise anyone to act on its behalf.

The court accepted his arguments, although it did annul the October 2009
court decision.

Markaryan of the Jehovah’s Witnesses told Forum 18 of the community’s
dissatisfaction with the decision.

April raid and fines

On 10 April, the criminal investigation chief of Stepanakert city police
invited Pastor Levon Sardaryan of Revival Fire Evangelical Church to his
office to warn him that it had no right to meet as it does not have
registration, Sardaryan told Forum 18 from Stepanakert on 27 April. The
officer threatened to send police to raid the church if it continued to
meet.

On the morning of 11 April, as the church was meeting for Sunday worship at
Sardaryan’s home, about seven police officers arrived and ordered the
service to stop. Church members refused, pointing out their rights under
the Constitution. Sardaryan, and three other church members soon after,
were taken to the police station, where they were pressured to sign
statements prepared in their names. However, they refused to sign the
prepared statements and wrote their own. They were then freed, but
threatened that if they continued to gather for Sunday worship they "would
not be treated so mildly".

Sardaryan wrote letters of complaint to Sargsyan, who responded to him that
as the church failed to get registration the church has no right to meet
and the police were right. Sardaryan also wrote to Ombudsperson
Hairapetyan.

Sardaryan and three other church members were summoned to an administrative
hearing on 27 April, which took place just before the Jehovah’s Witness
cases were due to be heard. The four were found guilty under Article 206
and each fined 1,000 Armenian Drams (15 Norwegian Kroner, 2 Euros or 3 US
Dollars). He said that despite the low level of the fines, they refused to
pay as they do not consider themselves guilty of any offence.

Sardaryan said that Sunday worship services were not raided on 18 and 25
April.

Revival Fire’s registration application was rejected in March 2009 after a
negative assessment by Sargsyan (see F18News 4 May 2009
< e_id=1290>).

Sardaryan insists his church has the right to meet under Constitutional
guarantees of freedom of conscience, religion, assembly and expression,
even if registration was denied and pledged to continue to hold services.

Prosecution for rejecting military oath?

Meanwhile, local Council of Churches Baptist and military conscript Armen
Mirzoyan, who is from Mardakert, is facing possible prosecution for
refusing to swear the military oath, Council of Churches Baptists told
Forum 18 from Karabakh. They say he was threatened by commanders of his
military unit in Hadrut after he refused their pressure to swear the oath
in the wake of his call-up in January. The investigator told his mother and
brother that the case had been handed over to the court.

However, one Baptist who knows Mirzoyan told Forum 18 on 27 April that no
date has been set for any hearing. However, the Baptist expressed concern
that, while Mirzoyan is refusing to swear the oath based on his reading of
the Bible, prosecutors are seeking to prosecute him for evading military
service. "But he’s already serving in his unit," the Baptist insisted.

Mirzoyan’s older brother Gagik was forcibly taken to a military unit in
December 2004 and beaten, and then imprisoned for refusing military
service. He was freed in September 2006 and transferred to a military unit,
where he was able to serve without swearing the oath and without bearing
arms. He was released from service in January 2008 (see F18News 27 March
2008 < 1105>).

Nagorno-Karabakh allows young men no alternative to compulsory military
service and has earlier imprisoned conscientious objectors. (END)

Further coverage of freedom of thought, conscience and belief in
Nagorno-Karabakh is at
< mp;religion=all&country=22>.

A printer-friendly map of the disputed enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh is
available at
< s/atlas/index.html?Parent=asia&Rootmap=azerba& gt;
within the map titled ‘Azerbaijan’.
(END)

© Forum 18 News Service. All rights reserved. ISSN 1504-2855
You may reproduce or quote this article provided that credit is given to
F18News

Past and current Forum 18 information can be found at

http://www.forum18.org/
http://www.forum18.org&gt
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?query=&a
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/xpedition
http://www.forum18.org/
http://www.forum18.org/