AGBU & Hamazkayin’s "Hantiboum" Artistic Evening Attracts 500

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x118
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:

PRESS RELEASE

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

AGBU & Hamazkayin’s "Hantiboum" Artistic Evening Attracts 500 to a
Celebration of Armenian Culture in the Bay Area

On April 19, 2009, 500 people from the Armenian community of San
Francisco and the surrounding Bay Area attended a grand cultural
celebration called "Hantiboum" at the Bayside Performing Arts Center in
San Mateo, California. Jointly organized by AGBU Silicon Valley and the
Nigol Aghpalian Chapter of Hamazkayin Armenian Educational and Cultural
Association, the artistic program "Hantiboum" was crafted by Avetis
Berberyan and Noushig Mikayelian.

Avetis Berberyan is a graduate of Yerevan’s Tchaikovsky Musical Academy
and Komitas Conservatory. From 1993 to 2000, he was director of the
concert tour division of the AGBU-sponsored Armenian Philharmonic
Orchestra. Noushig Mikayelian is an accomplished poet and singer, who
has studied at the Komitas Conservatory and currently teaches Armenian
language and music at Krouzian-Zekarian-Vasbouragan Armenian School in
San Francisco.

The concert began with Komitas’s "Hov arek," followed by the resonant
poem "Karnanayin" (Vernal) of Noushig Mikayelian. Other featured
compositions included works, performances, music and artistic
contributions by Alexander Ajemian, Khachatur Avetisian, Arno
Babajanian, Armen Babakhanian, Edward Baghdasarian, Avetis Berberyan,
Lutfig Dourian, Gevorg Emin, Nune Esayian, Alexander Harutiunian, Hovig
Hoveyian, Yeghishe Manucharian, Kate Fox Marcom, Greg Mazmanian, Natasha
Middleton, Sarkis Najarian, Garig Pantourian, Shushan Petrosian,
Aramayis Sahakian, Arsen Seropian, and Arsen Seropian.

Pupils of the Krouzian-Zekarian-Vasbouragan Armenian School participated
in the concert with an emotional rendition of "Hayrenikis hed" (With My
Fatherland) by Hovhannes Toumanian and a poem by their teacher Noushig
Mikayelian, which was accompanied by music prepared by Avetis Berberyan.

Proceeds from the performance went to support the ongoing educational
and cultural efforts of AGBU and Hamazkayin.

Established in 1906, AGBU () is the world’s largest
non-profit Armenian organization. Headquartered in New York City, AGBU
preserves and promotes the Armenian identity and heritage through
educational, cultural and humanitarian program, annually touching the
lives of some 400,000 Armenians around the world.

www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org

BAKU: It Is Enough To Compare Azerbaijani, Armenian Capitals: Americ

IT IS ENOUGH TO COMPARE AZERBAIJANI, ARMENIAN CAPITALS: AMERICAN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR

Today.Az

Aug 3 2009
Azerbaijan

American political commentator and representative of the
California-based analytical center The Tool Shed Group Jameson Katz
spoke in an interview with Day.Az.

Day.Az: President Obama says that the U.S. supports Georgia’s
territorial integrity, but against a new war in the Caucasus. Do not
you think that this indicates a change in American approach to the
resolution of Georgia’s territorial problems?

Jameson Katz: No, I do not think so. I am convinced that the United
States have always to say something in defense of the territorial
integrity of Georgia. I do not think that Obama has an intention to
change these approaches.

Q: Missile shield is still one of the most complicated issues in the
U.S.-Russia relations. Are you sure that the missile system which
may be deployed in Eastern Europe, in fact, directed against Iran,
but not Russia, it as suggested in Moscow?

A: No, I do not think that missiles will be directed against Russia,
at least in the predictable future. In the short term target of these
systems will involve the threat posed by Iran. I think this threat
today is one of the major challenges facing U.S. foreign policy and
security interests. So, I think fears of Russia about these systems
are not reasonable.

Q: What is it? United States and Russia are the main mediators in
the Karabakh settlement. After all, improving mutual understanding
between Moscow and Washington should be only for the benefit of
solving the conflict?

A: Yes, I think it would be useful for the resolution. Bilateral
relations between the United States and Russia are important in many
aspects including diversification of energy supply, security and
other issues. At the same time, as I already mentioned, Washington
is not fully aware of the essence of Moscow’s foreign policy.

Either way, reverting to the question of understanding, I would say
that yes, constructive relations between the United States and Russia
can help solve the conflict. In any case, the close relationship
between the two countries is better than confrontation. It is another
thing – whether Russians want the conflict to be resolved. For
instance, I am not sure they want it.

Q: Karabakh separatists did not abandon attempts to achieve
international recognition. Is there any possibility of separation of
Nagorno Karabakh from Azerbaijan and recognition of its independence?

A: Frankly speaking, I do not understand on what grounds the Armenians
of Nagorno-Karabakh expect that they could gain independence. I do
not think that this recognition will ever happen. I do not think that
anyone in the United States, with exception of the Armenian lobby,
would argue for the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh. The opposite
would be a big geopolitical mistake by the U.S. and I do not think
it will happen. The fact remains: the international community, UN,
EU and the United States does not intend to recognize independence
of Nagorno-Karabakh. This is an integral part of Azerbaijan and it
should remain so.

Frankly, if the Armenians had been wiser, they would not have engaged
in self-imposed isolation from the regional integration, but returned
the occupied territories and restored good relations with surrounding
countries. This is a very promising region with great political and
geopolitical importance.

To make sure that what policy by Azerbaijan and Armenia have brought
for these countries it is enough to look at capitals of these
countries. Today, Baku and Yerevan are simply not comparable for the
level of development. Armenia is a country that faces deep economic
crisis while Azerbaijan occupies a leading position in the world for
pace of economic development. Because Azerbaijan has good-neighborly
policy, builds constructive relationship with neighbors, is a reliable
trade partner and pursues pragmatic policy unlike Armenia.

http://www.today.az/news/politics/54347.html

Azerbaijan Purchased 32 APC-70 From Ukraine

AZERBAIJAN PURCHASED 32 APC-70 FROM UKRAINE

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
04.08.2009 10:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Ukraine sold 34 tanks (33 to Kenya and 1 to Georgia)
in 2008, Kyiv said in a report issued for the United Nations Register
of Conventional Arms.

Georgia purchased 15 infantry fighting vehicles and 25 armored
personnel carriers. U.S. bought 1 IFV-3. Azerbaijan bought 32 APC-70.

Ukraine made some $800 million by exporting arms last year,
replenishing the national budget with 1.185 billion hryvnas,
telegraf.by reported.

Turkey backpedaling on Armenia ties, US lawmakers say

TurkishNY
Aug 1 2009

Turkey backpedaling on Armenia ties, US lawmakers say

Saturday, 01 August 2009 08:26

Pro-Armenian members of the US House of Representatives step up their
efforts on normalization talks between Ankara and Yerevan, slamming
Turkey over what they call a reversal on the proposed ‘road map.’
Turkey’s position is in conflict with the US policy that normalization
should take place without preconditions, they say

More than 80 pro-Armenian members of the U.S. House of Representatives
sent a letter Thursday to President Barack Obama, complaining that
Turkey is failing to keep its pledge to move to normalize relations
with Armenia.
The letter said Turkey was in violation of an April deal with Yerevan.

`While the government of Armenia remains committed to this road map
and has long offered to establish ties with Turkey without
preconditions, Turkey’s public statements and actions since April 24
stand in sharp contrast to this agreement and undermine U.S. policy
that normalization take place without preconditions,’ the lawmakers
said in the letter.

According to the representatives, Turkey’s position is in conflict
with the U.S. policy `that normalization should take place without
preconditions and within a reasonable timeframe.’

Eighty-one lawmakers out the 435 members of the House of
Representatives signed the letter sent to Obama one day before the
House went on a one-month summer recess.

Reps. Frank Pallone, Mark Kirk, Adam Schiff and George Radanovich
initiated the letter July 10. The four are also the lead co-sponsors
of a House resolution affirming the U.S. record on Armenian claims of
genocide. The text of the letter was circulated to secure additional
congressional co-signers. Signatories to the letter included
Democratic Congressman Howard Berman from California, who is the
chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

The genocide issue

Pro-Armenian lawmakers are planning to step up efforts to ensure the
passage of an `Armenian genocide resolution’ pending in the House
after Congress reopens in September, analysts said.

Turkey and Armenia signed a document April 22, pledging to work to
normalize their relations. Although their road map has not been made
public, sources said it includes the setting up of full diplomatic
relations, and, more importantly, the reopening of the two neighbors’
land border, which has been closed for 16 years.

In the wake of the April document’s signing, President Obama declined
to describe the World War I-era killings of Armenians in the Ottoman
empire as `genocide’ in his annual statement on April 24, the day of
commemoration of the Armenian deaths.

Obama said he fully supported the Turkish-Armenian reconciliation
process.

The president’s decision not to say the word `genocide’ disappointed
members of the Armenian diaspora in the United States.

Though separate from other matters in principle, the normalization
process is indirectly related to an international effort to resolve
the long-standing Nagorno-Karabakh problem between Armenia and
Azerbaijan, a close ally and friend of Turkey.

Armenia has occupied the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh and part of
Azerbaijan proper since a war in the early 1990s. Though an uneasy
cease-fire is in place, a peace agreement has never been
signed. Diplomats privately admit that no major progress has been made
on either front since April.

2657-turkey-backpedaling-on-armenia-ties-us-lawmak ers-say.html

http://www.turkishny.com/en/english-news/1

As Of July 1, The Number Of The Permanent Population Of Armenia Reac

AS OF JULY 1 PERMANENT POPULATION IN ARMENIA REACHES 3 MILLION 240.7 PEOPLE

ARMENPRESS
JULY 30, 2009
YEREVAN

As of July 1, the number of the permanent population of Armenia
reached 3 million 240.7 people. Armenian National Statistics service
told Armenpress that 2 million 075.9 people are living in urban and
1 million 164.8 people in rural settlements.

1 million 113.4 people are living in capital Yerevan, 141.2 in
Aragatsotn province, 277.9 in Ararat province, 283.2 in Armavir,
240.7 in Gegharkunik, 281.3 in Lori, 279.4 in Kotayk, 281.0 in Shirak,
152.8 in Syunik, 55.8 in Vayots Dzor and 134.0 in Tavush province.

Surveys To Be Conducted In Armenia To Find Out The Impact Of Economi

SURVEYS TO BE CONDUCTED IN ARMENIA TO FIND OUT THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC CRISIS ON THE HOUSE ECONOMIES

ARMENPRESS
JULY 30, 2009
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, JULY 31, ARMENPRESS: With the support of the UN Armenian
office the RA Government will conduct surveys to find out the
consequences of the impact of the world financial-economic crisis on
4,248 families selected on different standards.

In connection with it today a document has been signed in the RA Labor
and Social Affairs Ministry between the Ministry, UN Armenian office
and RA National Statistic Service. It was signed by the Minister of
Labor and Social Affairs Gevorg Petrosyan, UN permanent coordinator
Consuelo Vidal and the head of RA National Statistic Service Stepan
Mnatsakanian.

G. Petrosyan noted that the economic crisis challenges the economies
of all states of the world including Armenia. Affecting the economy
it first of all threatens the vulnerable sections. The Minister
stressed the importance of the steps towards mitigation the impact
of the crisis noting that they will be more efficient if there is a
holistic idea about different sections of population.

The Minister said that the study will carry a continuative character
and the process will permanently be kept in the spotlight of the
attention of the ministry.

According to C. Vidal the survey will be a firm ground for the works
implemented during the upcoming 6 years within the frameworks of UNDP
directed towards the vulnerable sections of population – unemployed,
children, disabled, aged people, and refugees.

The preparatory works of the surveys have already kicked off; the final
result will be ready to issue in November. The Armenian office of the
UN World Food Program, UN Population, Children’s and International
Monetary Funds are involved in the process of researches.

Renovated Vedi Polyclinic Open It Doors To Public

RENOVATED VEDI POLYCLINIC OPEN IT DOORS TO PUBLIC

2009/ 07/31 | 15:40

Public Health

On July 31, 2009, a ribbon cutting ceremony marked the reopening of
the Vedi Medical Center’s Children Polyclinic. Sangita Patel,head of
the USAID/Armenia Social Reform Office and Mayor of Vedi Varuzhan
Barseghyan cut the ceremonial ribbon . This renovation was made
possible through the joint efforts of the US government, local
Armenian government and the Vedi Medical Center with the support of
USAID Project NOVA.

The Vedi Municipality and the Medical Center provided 25% of the
renovation budget, while USAID Project NOVA contributed 75%. In
addition, as part of Project NOVA, the Vedi Polyclinic personnel –
pediatricians and family physicians – participated in a series of
state-of-the-art training activities focusing on child health.

Project NOVA has worked in the Vedi region since 2006. Project works
include the establishment of a maternity school, renovation and
furnishing of the Women’s Consultation Center at the Vedi maternity
school, as well as training of medical personnel in key maternal and
child healthcare sectors. The Project has also renovated 10 rural
health posts in the Vedi region through the Community Partnership
for Health initiative, trained 14 community nurses in safe maternity
clinical skills and provided them with basic equipment and supplies
required for mother and child healthcare.

http://hetq.am/en/publichealth/vedi/

At What The Iranian Ambassador Hints

AT WHAT THE IRANIAN AMBASSADOR HINTS

LRAGIR.AM
12:57:29 – 01/07/2009

On July 1, answering a question on the Armenian and Iranian relations,
the Iranian ambassador to Armenia Seid Ali Saghighyan made a very
interesting statement in connection with the prospects of the
Armenia-Iran railway.

First, the Iranian ambassador stated that regardless who would win the
Iranian presidential election, the friendly relations with Armenia
would never change, because the stances of all the four candidates
in connection with foreign policy do not differ much. The Iranian
ambassador assured, that all the arrangements, which were taken months
ago during Serge Sargsyan’s visit to Iran, will be continued.

He stated that the arrangements include those concerning the railway,
Iran-Armenia oil pipeline. According to the Iranian ambassador,
a group of expert is going to arrive in Armenia to continue these
issues. According to him, the Armenian and Iranian initiatives have
not only a bilateral but also a regional significance.

For example, he stated, that if the Armenian and Iranian railway
will be continued up to the Black Sea, it will connect Europe with
China, Japan. On the other hand, he stated, that the oil pipeline may
involve also other interested sides, just as it happened in case of
the railway, as Russia, Kazakhstan, and even Turkey expressed their
willingness to participate in the financing of the project.

Dreams From Their Fathers

DREAMS FROM THEIR FATHERS

AZG Armenian Daily
01/08/2009

International; Turkish foreign policy

Turkey’s canny foreign minister seeks to pursue delicate diplomacy
all around Jul 23rd 2009, The Economist print edition

WHEN the official result of Iran’s contested presidential election
was announced last month, Turkey was one of the first countries to
congratulate Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Set against the repression (and
deaths) of Iranian protesters in the streets, this raised eyebrows
in Europe and America. It even provoked the tired old question of
whether Turkey may be turning its back on the West.

"People see only one side of this story," complains Ahmet Davutoglu,
Turkey’s foreign minister, in an interview. He does not elaborate. But
Turkey’s friendship with the Islamic republic has also proved useful to
the West. Its behind-the-scenes mediation was instrumental in securing
the recent release of British embassy staff in Tehran. And it can
play both ways. Five Iranian diplomats detained by the Americans in
Iraq in 2007 were freed earlier this month at Turkey’s urging.

The ease with which Turkey juggles different worlds, be they Arab or
Jewish, Muslim or European, prompted Hillary Clinton to call it an
"emerging global power". Its strong relations with Israel matter to
both countries, as became clear when they cooled during the invasion
of Gaza in January. The Turks have just had a high-profile spat with
China over its treatment of Xinjiang’s Uighurs, whom they regard
as kinsmen. It was understandable that one of Barack Obama’s first
presidential visits to a foreign country was to Turkey.

Some credit is due to Mr Davutoglu, who was a foreign-policy adviser
to the prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for seven years before
becoming foreign minister in May. This spry former academic is seen as
the architect of Turkey’s soft power, which blends realpolitik with
a fierce pride. A pious Muslim with a moralistic bent, Mr Davutoglu
has been among the most influential foreign ministers in the history
of the Turkish republic.

His approach rests on two pillars. One is to have "zero problems"
with the neighbours, many of them troubled or troublesome. The other
is "strategic depth". This calls for a Turkish zone of political,
economic and cultural influence, primarily among neighbours (many
of them former Ottoman dominions) in the Balkans, the south Caucasus
and the Middle East.

None of this detracts from Turkey’s determination to join the
European Union. Rather, it enhances its appeal as a member, says Mr
Davutoglu. He seems unfazed by the hostile noises from France and
Germany. Both Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel are lobbying for a
"privileged partnership" instead of full membership for Turkey. Mr
Davutoglu suggests that they are merely playing to their respective
electorates. "Instead of complaining, of being angry, we should work
together," he says. For Turkey that means reviving the flagging reform
process that won it the opening of EU membership talks in 2005. Mr
Davutoglu is hopeful, for example, that the Greek Orthodox seminary
on the island of Halki off Istanbul will soon be reopened.

But EU diplomats say none of this will let Turkey off the hook over
Cyprus. Mr Davutoglu agrees that decades-old peace talks between
Turkish- and Greek-Cypriot leaders should not be open-ended. A
deal really needs to be struck by the end of this year. For that to
happen the EU and America must tell the Greek-Cypriots to get serious
(though, as EU members already, they have little incentive to help). A
settlement would avert the possible train wreck in Turkey’s relations
with the EU that might otherwise come in December. In theory Turkey
has until then to open air- and seaports to the Greek-Cypriots, but it
refuses to do this until EU trade restrictions on Turkish-controlled
north Cyprus are lifted.

Might France and Turkey’s other enemies use this as an excuse
to freeze the EU membership talks altogether (eight chapters have
already been suspended)? Turkish leaders like to believe that Europe
needs Turkey more than Turkey needs Europe. It has become even more
crucial as a potential transit route for Europe-bound natural gas
from energy-rich Azerbaijan and Central Asia, as well as from Iraq
(and eventually Iran). Mr Davutoglu points proudly to the recent
signing of an agreement between Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary
and Austria on the Nabucco pipeline that is meant to carry gas through
these countries, reducing Europe’s dependence on Russia.

Yet some say that Turkey is overplaying its hand. Its energy dreams are
tightly linked to its ethnic cousins in Azerbaijan. Relations between
these Turkic allies took a dive in April when Turkey unveiled a draft
agreement to establish diplomatic ties and reopen its border with
Armenia. In a dramatic shift, Turkey even dropped its long-running
precondition that Armenia must withdraw from the territories that it
occupied in the 1990s after its war with Azerbaijan over the mainly
Armenian enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh.

An infuriated Azerbaijan promptly threatened to turn to Russia. In
June it signed a deal to sell gas to the Russians from 2010
onwards. So Turkey did another volte-face. Mr Erdogan declared that
friendship with Armenia was no longer possible unless it withdrew
from Nagorno-Karabakh. Mr Davutoglu insists that Turkey wants peace
with Armenia. But one Western diplomat says that "rapprochement with
Armenia is on its last legs."

This has raised the spectre of a row with Turkey’s most powerful ally,
America. Armenian-Americans want Mr Obama to honour his election
pledge to insist that the massacre by Ottoman forces of more than a
million of their ancestors in 1915 was genocide. In a fudge in April
Mr Obama said that he had not changed his views on the matter; yet he
spoke only of the Medz Yeghern ("great calamity" in Armenian). He did
not want to torpedo Turkish-Armenian rapprochement by using the G-word.

Turkey’s strategic location had once again proven decisive. As
American forces withdraw from Iraq, Turkey is seeking to avert a
looming conflict between the Arabs and the Kurds, especially over the
disputed city of Kirkuk. Turkey urged Iraq’s Sunnis not to boycott
elections in 2005. Mr Davutoglu is again lobbying to ensure that
all Iraqi groups take part in the parliamentary election in January
2010. "We have excellent relations with the United States at every
level," he says. And, notes a Western official, "when it comes to
Turkey and Armenia, Turkey wins every time."

USAID World Food Programme Representative Hails The Effective Cooper

USAID WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME REPRESENTATIVE HAILS THE EFFECTIVE COOPERATION WITH ARMENIA

armradio.am
31.07.2009 11:40

Representative of the USAID World Food Programme Maha Ahmed presented
her credentials to the Foreign Minister of Armenia, Edward Nalbandian.

Minister Nalbandian expressed gratitude to Mrs. Ahmed for the support
the World Food Programme provides to Armenia.

Maha Ahmed hailed the effective cooperation between the Armenian
Government and the World Food Programme and presented the programs
envisaged in Armenia.