ArmenTel Exclusive Right to Provide All Telco in Armenia until 2013

Research and Markets: ArmenTel Is Granted the Exclusive Right to
Provide All Telecommunications Services in Armenia Until 2013
Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:30pm EDT

DUBLIN–(Business Wire)–
Research and Markets
( h/ee407f/armenia_telecoms)
has announced the addition of the "Armenia – Telecoms, Mobile &
Internet" report to their offering.

The Armenia – Telecoms, Mobile & Internet report includes all research
data and analysis on this country. Covering trends and developments in
telecommunications, mobile, internet, broadband, infrastructure and
regulation.

The telecommunications sector in Armenia went into decline following
the collapse of the former Soviet Union. Fixed-line teledensity fell
by around 2% partly due to the prevailing socio-economic instability
in the region triggered by the collapse of the Soviet Union. But more
significant a factor was that the country had failed to embrace any
vigorous reform in the telecom sector.

With steadily improving economic conditions, the telecoms sector has
nevertheless been slow to respond. In the 2006/07 period positive
signs were emerging for the sector, however; despite fixed line
expansion continuing to be flat, mobile subscriber numbers were
increasing by around 75% annually for a number of years, helped no
doubt by the introduction of competition into the mobile market in
2005. Growth in mobiles had slowed to 30% annually coming into 2009 as
the faltering Armenian economy started to have a negative effect on
the telecom market.

Armenia’s progress to a more competitive market has been
slow. ArmenTel, the country’s national telecom provider, was granted
the exclusive right to provide all telecommunications services in
Armenia, including public switched telephony services and mobile
telephony, until 2013. As a consequence of this monopoly, no other
company was able to provide international satellite services. The one
segment of the market initially exempt from this monopoly was Internet
services.

Greek company Hellenic Telecommunications Organisation (OTE) invested
US$142.5 million in 1998 for a 90% equity stake in ArmenTel. The
remaining 10% was retained by the Government of Armenia. OTE agreed to
develop and expand the telecom infrastructure in Armenia, including
the digitisation of the Public Switched Telephone Network. OTE also
agreed to invest US$300 million in the country’s telecommunications
network by 2003, of which US$100 million was to be invested in
ArmenTel.

However, amid growing dissatisfaction over the performance of the
country’s telecoms network, in November 2004 the government was under
increasing pressure to do something about the ArmenTel monopoly. It
reached a compromise agreement with ArmenTel to end its exclusive
rights to provide a range of services, including GSM mobile services,
satellite and mobile radio communications services in exchange for
various other concessions, including the stipulation that only one
alternative mobile operator would be allowed to operate in Armenia
until 2009. ArmenTel was to also retain sole rights to Internet
telephony and the use of fibre optic cables.

The government subsequently made a controversial decision to choose
Armenia’s second mobile operator without transparent and competitive
bidding; Karabakh Telecom (KT), a little-known Lebanese-owned company,
was officially awarded a licence to operate a GSM network in Armenia.

OTE put its 90% equity in ArmenTel up for sale in June 2006, offered
to the market through a bidding process. Russian operator VimpelCom
was the successful bidder, finally acquiring the stake in November
2006. VimpelCom finalised the deal in April 2007 acquiring the
remaining 10% of the shares of ArmenTel from the Government of Armenia
to raise its equity holding in the company to 100%.

In December 2007 the Public Services Regulatory Commission (PSRC) said
that the government of Armenia planned to award a third mobile licence
in 2008 based on the GSM 900/1800 standard. There was to be a call for
an international tender with bidding for the licence which was due to
start in May 2008 and to be completed by August 2008. A new
commission, to be established by the government, would oversee the
process. Orange Armenia was awarded a 15-year mobile operator licence
in November 2008. The newly licensed operator was 100% owned by France
Telecom (Orange).

Key Highlights:

* By December 2008 mobile penetration in Georgia had reached 85%,
having increased more than fivefold in just three years; * In late
2008 and into 2009, however, the mobile market was showing signs of
stalling, as the country’s faltering economy impacted on the telecom
sector;
* On the positive front, a third mobile licence had been issued and
the new player Orange Armenia had already invested heavily in its
network and was aiming for a launch late in 2009;
* It was also encouraging that ArmenTel had launched its 3G mobile
service in October 2008 and had signed up almost 20,000 subscribers by
March 2009;
* Fixed-line growth in Armenia was slow; with still only 67% of the
network digital by mid-2009, the big challenge facing ArmenTel was to
complete the digitalisation program;
* While there is a growing Internet awareness in the country, the
Internet segment of the market remains sluggish, with user penetration
down around 6% in early 2009;
* Broadband Internet development has also been poor; the advent of
wireless broadband/WiMAX service offerings in 2008/09 could allow for
faster expansion, however;
* Armenia’s economy experienced a serious setback in 2008/09; it is
hoped the progress being made in telecom sector reform would not
suffer as a consequence of troubles in the wider economy.

Report’s Stats:

* Armenia – key telecom parameters – 2008 – 2009
* Category: 2008 – 2009 (e)
* Fixed-line services:
* Total number of subscribers: 650,000 – 675,000
* Annual growth: 4% – 4%
* Fixed-line penetration (population): 21% – 22%
* Internet:
* Total number of subscribers: 1120,000 – 127,000
* Annual growth: 7% – 6%
* Internet subscriber penetration (population): 4% – 4%
* Mobile services:
* Total number of subscribers (million): 2.56 – 2.90
* Annual growth: 37% – 14%
* Mobile penetration (population): 85% – 94%

For more information visit
e407f/armenia_telecoms

Research and Markets
Laura Wood, Senior Manager,
[email protected]
U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907
Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

Copyright Business Wire 2009 3050+12-Oct-2009+BW20091012

http://www.researchandmarkets.com/researc
http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/e
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS12

Turks Pass To Karabakh

TURKS PASS TO KARABAKH

hos15499.html
11:23:18 – 12/10/2009

After the singing of the Armenian-Turkish protocols, the Turkish
officials made a statement regarding the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The
Turkish Prime Minister Erdoghan stated that the Armenian and Turkish
relations will not be normalized until the Karabakh conflict is not
settled. He said Turkey is loyal to its promise to Azerbaijan and until
the Azerbaijani territories are not liberated, Turkey cannot give a
positive answer in connection with its relations with Armenia. The
last word belongs to the Turkish parliament.

In turn, the Turkish Foreign Minister Davudoghlu said the protocols
are the peace project of Turkey. He said Turkey knows where it goes
and for what, and in order to establish peace in the region, the
Karabakh conflict must be settled. We did not leave Azerbaijan alone,
we mean the liberation of Azerbaijan territories, said Davudoghlu.

He said if the parliament ratifies the protocols, it will be the
start of diplomatic relations. Turkey recognizes Armenia until 1993,
in other words, before the "occupation of Azerbaijani lands", said
the Turkish Foreign Minister.

The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry also issued a statement which reminds
the Turkish officials about their pledges that until the Azerbaijani
lands are not liberated, the border will not open. The Azerbaijani
Foreign Minister stated that establishment of relations without
the withdrawal of the Armenian troops contradicts the Azerbaijani
interests and shadows the spirit of brotherhood of the Azerbaijani
and Turkish nations. The Foreign Ministry stated that the unilateral
opening of the border will make questionable the peace in the region.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-lra

Kremlin confirms Serzh Sargsyan’s visit

News.am

Kremlin confirms Serzh Sargsyan’s visit
17:18 / 10/10/2009

Kremlin confirmed the information on RA President Serzh Sargsyan’s
visit to Moscow, October 12, 2009. Sargsyan will arrive in Moscow at
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev’s invitation, Kremlin press service
reports.

As NEWS.am reported earlier, RA President Serzh Sargsyan will hold
talks with his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev during his
visit. The parties will discuss a wide range of issues, including the
political situation in the South Caucasus in the context of
Armenia-Turkey Protocols’ signing in Zurich.

President Sargsyan arrived in Rostov-on-Don as part of his
pan-Armenian tour. Sargsyan discussed the Armenia-Turkey normalization
process, as well as the signing of the Armenian-Turkish Protocols with
Diaspora representatives.

As regards the view that the Armenia-Turkey reconciliation will cause
damage to the Armenian-Russian strategic cooperation, Serzh Sargsyan
stated: `These views are unfounded, incited by unawareness and are
often presented as a product of analytical thinking.’

`Armenian-Russian strategic cooperation is progressing rapidly,
including the cooperation within the OSCE. You will witness the
developments that will dispel doubts of the ones showing the deepest
distrust,’ Sargsyan said.

A Book A Week: Mother On Fire By Sandra Tsing Loh

A BOOK A WEEK: MOTHER ON FIRE BY SANDRA TSING LOH
Becky Holmes

Isthmus Daily Page
10/09/2009 6:00 pm

Sandra Tsing Loh is a writer, performance artist and public radio
commentator. I don’t hear her much on radio but I do read her
pieces in the Atlantic. I’ve also never seen any of her one-woman
shows but would sure like to. In 2008 she published Mother on Fire,
a memoir about her life in Los Angeles, framed around her search for
an appropriate school for her kindergarten-age daughter.

This is a very funny book, filled with raw emotion and angst. Loh
takes on issues of class and status, money worries, stalled careers,
the mommy wars and the frantic pace of life in LA. She expertly
captures the desperate panic of educated, affluent, urban parents in
search of the perfect environment for their precious offspring.

Loh herself vacillates between being one of these super-obsessed types
and being a slacker mom, and freely admits her own contradictory
impulses. That’s partly what makes the book so entertaining. One
day Loh is touring the $22,000-a-year private (pseudonymous) Wonder
Canyon School, where "children honor diversity, learn peaceful conflict
resolution and are taught music using the Orff-Schulwerk method."

Of course there is no diversity at Wonder Canyon; as Loh points out,
the children must honor it because they don’t actually experience
it. The next day Loh is letting her daughters watch Disney
princess videos for the 82nd time and feeding them Kraft macaroni
and cheese. She is consumed with guilt for failing to provide Baby
Mozart and organic broccoli, all the while railing against the forces
that make her feel guilty. But despite how much Loh wants the Wonder
Canyon, there is no way that she and her husband can afford it on
the combined income of a journalist and a musician.

Thus Loh’s daughter ends up at an L.A. public magnet school. It’s
a better choice than the local elementary school, though she is the
only blonde in a sea of Central American and Armenian children. But w
~@~Ys school is a warm and loving place where the children thrive. As
a result of this revelation Loh becomes a public school activist and
runs a Web site for parents of children in L.A. public schools.

Loh’s writing style takes a little getting used to. Her articles in
the Atlantic are straightforward magazine-style journalism, but Mother
on Fire is filled with exclamation marks! — and interjections! Also
lots of $%^#@!!!!! Before writing this book, Loh performed a stage
version of Mother on Fire for seven months in Los Angeles. I imagine
the book reflects the style of the show. Was there a lot of ranting
and desperate proclaiming? I bet there was.

On Sevan – Yerevan Highway The RA NA Deputy Died

ON SEVAN – YEREVAN HIGHWAY THE RA NA DEPUTY DIED

Aysor.am
Friday, October 09

On October 8 there was an alarm that at around 19:30 pm, on the 32nd
km of Sevan – Yerevan highway, next to Charentsavan city, in unclear
circumstances a car with stamp of "Mercedes-500" has come out of the
drivable part of the road and has crashed into the tree as a result
of which the passenger, citizen of Yerevan, Melik Gasparyan, RA NA
deputy born in 1951 died immediately.

The driver, V. Petrosyan, who is a citizen of Vardenis city of
Gegharkunik region and is born in 1979 and the passenger Khachik
Manukyan born in 1959 in Yerevan have received different kinds of
injuries and have been transported to the medical center of "Saint
Grigor Lusavorich" in Yerevan. The doctors say the state of the
injured is satisfactory.

Greater The Oligarch’s Power, The Less Armenia Will Develop: Hrant B

GREATER THE OLIGARCH’S POWER, THE LESS ARMENIA WILL DEVELOP: HRANT BAGRATYAN

Tert.am
14:47 09.10.09

Ex-Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia Hrant Bagratyan referred
to the economic consequences of Armenian-Turkish border opening while
speaking with journalists today.

"Of course, one should prepare for economic relations, sooner or later
we had to collide with Turkish capital, with Turkish business. The
difference is that Turkish medium entrepreneur is more dynamic,
more literate and more advanced, than the Armenian one. It will be
the first time we will mingle with the Turkish people during our
thousand-year history of contact when the Turkish people are more
advanced than us in all aspects," Bagratyan said.

According to Bagratyan, if the border opens, generally trade will allow
production in Armenia to be cheaper, but "an interesting phenomena
will take place which may mix everything up."

"Armenia’s centralized, oligarchic economy will collide with Turkey’s
non-centralized, non-oligarchic dynamic private sector. Turkey’s
number one advantage is its dynamic private sector, everyone says
this," the ex-prime minister stated.

According to him, the imported Turkish products will be cheaper and
the local producer’s situation will worsen slightly at first, but,
according to Bagratyan, it cannot be said that if the local producer’s
situation worsens, then we cannot have contact with Turkey.

"The most appalling thing for me is not the fact that we have no
production today… For example, in Antalya there are about 5,000
hotel owners. In Armenia, that wouldn’t be allowed, either Kocharian
or some other would be the owners; at the most, ownership would be in
the hands of ten individuals. There is no such greediness in Turkey
as there is in Sevan. We don’t have a private entrepreneur that can
compete with Turkey. At first, Turkish capital will collide with
Armenia’s oligarchs but the Turks are not so foolish as to come and
develop private businesses in Armenia. Sooner or late e oligarchs,
understanding very well the bigger the oligarchs’ power, the less
Armenia will develop. If you want to know the problem, those ten
people don’t allow Armenia to develop, we lose in that case, if we
are internally weak," Bagratyan added.

Weeks Of Germany In Armenia

WEEKS OF GERMANY IN ARMENIA

ArmInfo
2009-10-09 18:10:00

ArmInfo. The weeks of Germany are coming back to Armenia.

Minister of Culture of Armenia Hasmik Pogossyan says that the autumn
program of the weeks includes a concert by Dominik Wagner Quartett
feat. singer Carolin Bechtle, demonstration of German documentary
films about environmental problems, an exhibition of photos by former
ambassador of Germany to Armenia Hans Wulf-Bartels (in Gyumri on Oct
24), a house party by a German DJ. "We are also planning to organize
a rock concert," says Pogossyan.

The weeks of Germany started Mar 20 with an exhibition of Horst
Janssen.

Concerts, exhibitions and workshops – almost 40 events – have taken
place so far in the framework of the weeks in Yerevan, Kapan, Vanadzor,
Syunik and Gyumri.

Protest Rally Ends At Tsitsernakaberd Genocide Victims’ Memorial In

PROTEST RALLY ENDS AT TSITSERNAKABERD GENOCIDE VICTIMS’ MEMORIAL IN YEREVAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.10.2009 20:54 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Protest rally of over 20 000 people, launched today
at Yerevan’s Republic Square, continues at Tsitsernakaberd Genocide
victims’ memorial. Among participants were 12 RA political forces,
united against RA Turkish Protocols’ conclusion: ARF Dashnaktsutyun,
Ramkavar Azatakan Party, New Times Party, National Party, Democratic
Party, Heritage, Goyamart, Mother Armenia, RA Socialist Labor Party,
United Armenians, Oath of Armenian Unity, Armenian Aryan Union.

ARF Dashnaktsutyun bureau representative Vahan Hovhannesyan, New Times
Party Leader Aram Karapetyan, Ramkavar Azatakan Party Chairman Harutyun
Arakelyan, Heritage Administration Head Armen Martirosyan delivered
statements, once again specifying that RA external policy deviated
from its course and poses threat to Armenia’s national security and
future, adding that October 10 Protocols’ conclusion will cancel out
the process of Armenian Genocide’s international recognition, deprive
Genocide victims’ descendants of the right to their motherland and
threaten NKR’s independence.

Demonstrators once again urged RA President to refrain from
ratification of unfair and anti-Armenian document, emphasizing that
in the opposite case protest rallies will continue.

The next protest rally will take place on October 16 at Yerevan’s
Moscow film theater.

Artsakh Armenians Overcautious About Political Processes

ARTSAKH ARMENIANS OVERCAUTIOUS ABOUT POLITICAL PROCESSES

News.am
21:11 / 10/09/2009

"The Artsakh Armenians’ attitude to the Armenia-Turkey normalization
process is actually predetermined by the fact that Azerbaijan has
made the Nagorno-Karabakh problem hostage to the Armenian-Turkish
relations," said the historian Mher Harutyunyan, Head of the Kachar
research center.

He pointed out that Turkey and Azerbaijan are doing their best to
link the two processes.

"From this point of view, the Artsakh Armenians are overcautious
about the ongoing political processes. Quite another matter is if
the Armenia-Turkey normalization process is viewed in the context of
establishment of bilateral diplomatic relations, lifting of Armenia’s
blockade and restoration of other ties. The steps being made in
this direction are likely to produce positive results. However,
in the context of our triunity (Armenia-Karabakh-Diaspora) and the
Turkish society, many issues remain open. Our millions-strong Diaspora
was chiefly formed as a result of Turkey’s genocidal policy toward
Armenians. Our people, which had for centuries been subjected to
persecution and violence by the Turkish authorities, cannot forget
it so easily," Harutyunyan said.

He said that the Armenian President’s meetings with Diasporan
representatives were "a most important initiative aimed at specifying
certain issues."

Armenian Diaspora Becomes Important Political Factor

ARMENIAN DIASPORA BECOMES IMPORTANT POLITICAL FACTOR
Karine Ter-Sahakyan

PanARMENIAN.Net
06.10.2009 GMT+04:00

How important the voice of the Diaspora is, has become clear in the
light of recent developments in normalization of Armenian-Turkish
relations.

Until recently Armenian Diaspora was perceived in the world as a kind
of irritating Turkey factor and a tool in the hands of the Armenian
state to advance their interests at international level. Such an
image of the Diaspora has been grounded to some extent, because in
the course of almost all its activity, Armenian organizations around
the world have been engaged exclusively in the problem of recognition
of the Armenian Genocide, and for the past 20 years – the problem of
recognition of Nagorno Karabakh.

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Pan-Armenian tour of the President of
Armenia seems to have raised the significance of the Diaspora to
a new level. Let us recall that all the attempts to attract seven
or eight million Armenians scattered all over the world with the
aim to solve problems inside Armenia have almost always ended in
a naught. As a proof to this can serve the three Armenia-Diaspora
forums, all ending in idle talks and non-committal statements. From
then on the Diaspora began to believe that for Armenia Spyurk is a
"milk cow" which is ready to allocate funds out of patriotism. And
nobody could think that the Diaspora is capable of really influencing
the foreign policy of Armenia, and not only Armenia, but also those
states where it is powerful and more united. It primarily refers to
the United States, Lebanon, France and, to some extent, Russia. Russian
Diaspora is less organized as a result of lack of tradition and great
distances, despite the large number of Diaspora organizations. It
is also relatively young and its representatives are not burdened
by the load of ancestors who survived the Armenian Genocide. But in
Russia too can the Armenian community influence the taking on of any
decisions necessary for Armenia.

How important the voice of the Diaspora is, has become clear in the
light of recent developments in normalization of Armenian-Turkish
relations.. Greater part of Diaspora clearly opposes the signing
of any documents with Turkey. It is appropriate to note that
the politically mature part of the Diaspora is Dashnaktsutyun,
which has many adherents in all countries of the world. Moreover,
it has leverage over the governments of different countries in the
form of the Armenian lobby, which, whatever may be said about it, is
quite a powerful organization, especially in promoting true Armenian
interests, among which recognition of the Armenian Genocide holds the
first standing. By the way, precisely thanks to this issue the Armenian
organizations in the USA gain financial assistance for Armenia from the
United States Government. Moreover, it is to the Diaspora that Armenia
should be grateful for the close Armenian-French relations. And under
such circumstances it is simply impossible to neglect the opinion of
the Diaspora in Armenian-Turkish Protocols.

In any event, the Armenian Diaspora is becoming an important political
factor not only for Armenia but also for the whole world. Not without
purpose does Turkish President Abdullah Gul regularly declare that
Yerevan needs to get rid of "opinions imposed by the Diaspora, which
averts the normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations". By the way,
this point of view from Turkey is not new and it is continually
voiced as soon as there arises a danger for Ankara. Turkey fears
the Diaspora, and it is quite logical. The strange point is whether
the Turkish leadership is so naive as to believe that the protocols
would be signed without advice from the Diaspora. Or, Ankara is so
confident about the possibility of direct pressure on the President
of Armenia that it excludes such a possibility. It is hard to believe
such a naivete, but it is also possible that like a sly fox Turkey
is trapped with two legs at once.