Mannig’s Own Testimony! The Armenian Genocide 1915-1923

Newropeans Magazine
April 25 2009

Mannig’s Own Testimony! The Armenian Genocide 1915-1923

Focus
Written by Harry Hagopian
Saturday, 25 April 2009

I was six years old when we were deported from our lovely home in
Adapazar, near Istanbul. I remember twirling in our parlour in my
favourite yellow dress while my mother played the violin. It all ended
when the Turkish police ordered us to leave town.

The massacre of my family, of the Armenians, took place during a
three-year trek of 600 kilometres across the Anatolian Plateau and
into the MesopotamianDesert. I can’t wipe out the horrific images of
how my father and all the men in our foot caravan were shipped to
death. My cousin and all other males 12 years and older were shoved
off the cliffs into the raging EuphratesRiver. My grandmother and the
elderly were shot for slowing down the trekkers. Two of my siblings
died of starvation. My aunt died of disease, and my mother survived
the trek only to perish soon from an influenza epidemic.

Of my family, only my sister and I were still alive. The Turkish
soldiers forced us, along with 900 other starving children, into the
deepest part of the desert to perish in the scorching sun. Most did.

But God must have been watching over me. He placed me in the path of
the Bedouin Arabs who were on a search and rescue mission for Armenian
victims. They saved me. I lived under the Bedouin tents for several
months before they led me to an orphanage in Mosul. I was sad about
our separation, but the Bedouin assured me that the orphanage was
sponsored by good people.

To my delight, I was reunited with my sister at the orphanage. She,
too, was saved by the Bedouin Arabs. The happiest days in my life were
at the orphanage. We had soup and bread to eat every day and were
sheltered under white army tents donated by the British.

Above all, my sister and I were family again.

This is Mannig Dobajian-Kouyoumjian’s spine-tingling testimony of her
own experience as a survivor of the Armenian genocide. Last year, she
had asked her daughter Aïda Kouyoumjian from Seattle to write
her story for the US Holocaust Centre. It is a moving witness, a
powerful declaration and a sobering story of the pain and humiliation
of one victim of this genocide-driven mass campaign. Yet, it is also a
story of how our faith helps us when we are coerced to drink from the
bitter cup, a reminder of how the tenacity of hope overcomes deep
despair, and evidence of how the compassionate Arab and Muslim worlds
helped Armenian victims and welcomed them into their families and
hearths across the whole Middle East.

The Armenian Genocide: as historians have asserted on the basis of
ample archival evidence, this first genocide of the 20th century was
perpetrated by the Ottoman Turkish government between 1915 and 1923
when it systematically and relentlessly targeted and killed Armenians
within its Empire. Ultimately, well over one million ethnic Armenians,
who incidentally were Ottoman and later Turkish citizens, lost their
lives.

As an Armenian born after this grisly period of our history, I often
wonder how our forbears managed to persevere in the face of such
immense suffering and adversity. Not only did they, their families or
friends undergo the most harrowing experiences, they also managed to
pick themselves up and rebound from the devastation of their orphaned
situations. It is their intrepid steadfastness and their belief in
their collective identity as Armenians, that we – the younger
generations – can now lead our lives more freely and with more
confidence.

But what does this say about modern-day Turkey on the day when
Armenians commemorate the 94th anniversary of the genocide? Equally
importantly, what does it say of those across the world who still
resist tooth and nail the idea of genocide – any acts of genocide, be
they the Armenian one or other subsequent ones – with denial, and who
debase human life and dignity for spurious political and economic
considerations? How can we possibly claim to defend a political order
based on human rights and common decency on the one hand only to
stifle it on the other? Do denialists not recall George Santayana, a
principal figure in classical American philosophy, asserting that
`those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it’ (in
The Life of Reason, Volume 1, 1905).

As the American NPR broadcaster Scott Simon wrote in `Genocide’ is a
Matter of Opinion, there are times when one has to utter the word
`genocide’ in order to be accurate about mass murder that tries to
extinguish a whole group. That is why the slaughter of a million
Tutsis in Rwanda is not called merely mass murder. This is also why
any politician who goes to Germany, for instance, and describes the
Holocaust of European Jews merely as `terrible killings’ would be
reviled without mercy and even prosecuted without appeal.

After all, did President Obama not also assume the high moral ground
during the US presidential primaries by stating clearly that the
Armenian people deserved `a leader who speaks truthfully about the
Armenian genocide and responds forcefully to all genocides’? Mind you,
despite the high expectations and an air of suspense in the USA, this
American president prevaricated in his Armenian Remembrance Day on
24th April when his written statement from the White House referred
twice to the Armenian genocide as medz yeghern – translated literally
as `great catastrophe’ rather than `genocide’ – and thereby joined a
host of former US presidents who have relented from using the
`g-word’. Is there a sad moral in this unfortunate recurrence? Is it
that in a showdown between realpolitik and the truth, in other words
between contemporary political expediency and the burden of past
atrocities, the former seems to win most times? And if so, does this
not sadly alert us – believers and humanists alike – how the values of
our global world today often obviate words such as truth, conscience
and honour?

24 April 2009: six years shy of a century and denial – no matter
whether individual, collective or institutional – still contaminates
the truth. Is it therefore not high time to put the record straight?
Is it not time for Turkish officials to put jingoism, let alone
misplaced pride or fear aside by recognising this unfortunate chapter
of their Ottoman history during WWI? Is it not time for the Turkish
judicial system today to stop invoking Article 301 of the Turkish
Penal Code and charging reporters or writers, including the Nobel
laureate Orthan Pamuk, with the risible crime of `insulting Turkish
national identity’ simply because they refer to the massacres of
Armenians as genocide? Is it not time also for Turkish President
Abdullah Gül and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an to
prove their EU-friendly credentials and reformist integrity by
mustering the political fortitude let alone moral rectitude to
acknowledge past aberrations? Moreover, is it not time for the world
community to embark upon a veritable phase of genocide education by
underlining the eight stages of genocide that culminate with denial –
as elaborated by Dr Gregory H Stanton in his Eight Stages of Genocide
in 1998 when he was president of Genocide Watch? Or as the chartered
clinical psychologist Aida Alayarian elucidated in her book
Consequences of Denial, does the denial of the Armenian genocide not
deprive its victims the opportunity to make sense of their experience,
as much as render Turkish society unable to come to terms with its
past, and therefore with itself?

Such recognition is not solely for the sake of Armenians. After all, I
consider this genocide a historically-recognised reality even if some
governments dither, equivocate and refuse to admit to it for reasons
that have more to do with political weakness than historical
truthfulness. Rather, it is also for the memory of all those righteous
Turks who assisted, harboured and supported Armenians during this
wounded chapter of history. But as a firm believer in forgiveness and
reconciliation, it is ultimately for the sake of both Armenians and
Turks alike so they can begin the painful but ineluctable journey
toward a just closure of this open sore.

Dr Harry Hagopian
ecumenical, legal & political consultant
London – UK

9280/88/

http://www.newropeans-magazine.org/content/view/

Presidents Of Turkey And Azerbaijan Discuss Issue Of Normalization O

PRESIDENTS OF TURKEY AND AZERBAIJAN DISCUSS ISSUE OF NORMALIZATION OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELAITONS

ArmInfo
2009-04-24 10:56:00

ArmInfo. President of Turkey Abdullah Gul talked to President of
Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev by telephone on April 23, Day.az reported
referring to ANS Press.

As CNN Turk Turkish TV channel reports, the information about it was
disseminated by the Turkish president’s press service.

According to the information, a number of issues, including the issue
of normalization of the Turkish-Armenian relations were discussed
during the telephone conversation. The parties emphasized importance
of close cooperation between the brotherly countries and its influence
on achievement of stability and welfare in the region.

Joe Biden Welcomes Progress In Armenian-Turkish Relations

JOE BIDEN WELCOMES PROGRESS IN ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS

ArmInfo
2009-04-24 12:13:00

ArmInfo. Vice-president of the USA Joe Biden has welcomed the progress
in the Armenian-Turkish relations.

On Thursday Biden spoke by phone with Armenian President Serge
Sarkisian, and a statement from Biden’s office said the vice president
told him that he welcomed Wednesday’s announcement from Armenia and
Turkey of a breakthrough in normalizing ties after years of bitter
tensions.

"The vice president applauded President Sarkisian’s leadership, and
underscored the administration’s firm support for both Armenia and
Turkey in this process," the statement said.

The administration has tread carefully around the development, reached
through the help of Swiss mediators. On Friday, Obama is expected to
issue an annual presidential statement on the World War I-era killings
of Armenians by Ottoman Turks.

At issue is whether Obama will refer to the killings as genocide. Doing
so could shake the agreement and upend recent pledges of a closer
partnership with Turkey, a vital ally in a critical region.

Steering around the word would break his unequivocal campaign pledges
to recognize the killings as genocide, the Associated Press reported.

Royal Market & Bakery: Everything Armenian

ROYAL MARKET & BAKERY: EVERYTHING ARMENIAN

SF Weekly Blogs
al_market_bakery_everything.php
April 22 2009

Outside of a Church festival every October at St. John Etchmiadzin,
San Francisco has been fairly deprived of Armenian food. No more: since
last July, Royal Market & Bakery (5335 Geary between 17th & 18th) has
been offering a wide variety of products imported from Armenia, plus
items from countries with similar cuisines, such as Georgia and Turkey.

On the grocery front, Royal has dairy products including kefir and
cheeses, herring and other pickled fish, fresh and smoked fish,
fresh meat including veal tongue and lamb’s tounge and testicles,
and seasoned meat (shown above) ready to be skewered and grilled for
kebabs. The deli offers a wide variety of salads, pickles, olives,
sausages, smoked meats, and prepared foods made in-house.

The bakery turns out flatbreads, breads stuffed with spinach, cheese,
or meat, and a variety of sweets. There’s also a liquor department
with Armenian beer and brandy, Georgian wine, and a big selection of
vodkas and rakis.

http://blogs.sfweekly.com/foodie/2009/04/roy

Ardshininvestbank And HSBC Bank’s Bonds Most Traded In Armenia In Ma

ARDSHININVESTBANK AND HSBC BANK’S BONDS MOST TRADED IN ARMENIA IN MARCH

/ARKA/
April 20, 2009
YEREVAN

This month, the most traded were bonds those issued by
Ardshininvestbank and HSBC Bank Armenia with corresponding volumes
40% and 22% (from the total fixed income trading), Cascade Investment
says in its monthly study of Armenian market.

"The average yield increased from 11.6% to 12.7%, as the prices of
bonds had downward trend during the month. In general investors were
fearful of further dram depreciation and tended to sell out their
bonds forcing the prices to drop", the organization’s experts say.

In March the volume of traded corporate bonds on the NASDAQ OMX
decreased by 35% to approximately AMD 1.5 billion.

NASDAQ OMX Armenia has 26 companies, including 19 banks.

Ardshininvestbank CJSC got its license (N 83) from the Central Bank
of Armenia on February 27, 2003.

Now the bank’s key shareholders are Region, investment financial
corporation, (86.82%) and International Financial Corporation (10%).

Ardshininvestbank joined NASDAQ OMX Armenia on December 12, 2008.

HSBC Bank Armenia, subsidiary of HSBC Bank plc, was registered on
September 25, 1995.

HSBC Bank plc holds 70% of HSBC Bank Armenia shares. The remaining 30%
belong to overseas Armenian investors.

HSBC Bank Armenia became a member of NASDAQ OMX Armenia in late
January 2009.

Armenian Village Plans For Turkish Border Opening

ARMENIAN VILLAGE PLANS FOR TURKISH BORDER OPENING

Eurasianet

April 16, 2009

Amidst rising international expectations of an Armenian-Turkish
rapprochement, hopes are rising fast in the Armenian border village of
Margara that this hamlet of 1,500 people — site of the only bridge
between Armenia and Turkey — will soon become the two countries’
central land link.

"We are full of hopes," commented 50-year-old Gagik Avetisian, who
lives on the village street leading to Margara’s bridge over the Arax
River to Turkey. "They [officials] now come from Yerevan to repair
the roads. Maybe this time something will change, and the border will
really open up."

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Urban Development told EurasiaNet
that the repairs are routine and not connected with the border
discussions.

But Yerevan visitors asking about house prices or talking about
opening a shop, hotel, restaurant or gas station have fired Margara’s
expectations still higher. Avetisian says that he hopes to sell his
house and 1,000 square meters of adjacent land for a price several
times higher than before talks about reopening the border began.

Others concentrate on the jobs an opening of the 325-kilometer
Armenian-Turkish border could bring. Villagers currently subsist on
growing tomatoes, peppers and cucumbers for themselves and markets
in Yerevan.

"We have been waiting for it for so many years! We didn’t care before
if it was open or closed, but we want it [to open] now," said Kolia
Piliposian, the 74-year-old owner of the Margara house closest to the
border. "The living conditions are very poor here, and the opening
of the border will create jobs and will give opportunities to do
business here."

The government, meanwhile, is also expressing cautious optimism. At an
April 10 press conference to mark his first year in office, President
Serzh Sargsyan said that he plans to cross the border to attend an
October 7 World Cup-qualifying football match between Armenia and
Turkey in Istanbul.

"This can be viewed as an optimistic approach, and my optimism may
prove to be groundless, but we won’t be the losers in this move,"
Sargsyan affirmed. Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993 to
support ally Azerbaijan in the war with Armenia over the breakaway
Nagorno Karabakh region.

But despite Sargsyan’s stance, the debate among Yerevan analysts
about the pros and cons of an open border with Turkey shows little
sign of dying down.

Economists worry about whether Armenian companies would be able
to withstand an influx of cheaper goods from Turkey. Turkish goods
currently enter Armenia via Georgia; an open border would mean lower
transportation costs and, hence, lower prices.

Andranik Tevanian, chairman of the Politeconomia Center for Economic
Analysis, though, believes "that problem can be solved" by setting high
customs duties on Turkish goods. Tevanian estimates that the closed
border costs Armenia about $300 million in foreign trade each year.

Herbert Hambardzumian, secretary general of the Union of International
Cargo Carriers of Armenia, points to lower cargo costs for Armenian
exporters — Turkish ferry services across the Black Sea are cheaper
than Russian services by $1,000 to $1,500 per ferry, he noted.

One political analyst, however, worries about how Armenia will cope
with an influx of ethnic Armenians from Turkey. "There will be very
serious problems of national security and demography," noted Armen
Aivazian, director of the Ararat Center for Strategic Research.

An open border will give the Turkish government "additional leverage"
to use against Armenia on the Nagorno Karabakh dispute, he argued,
expressing a fear that Azerbaijanis with Turkish passports would be
able to enter Armenia without restriction. "Armenia’s weak system of
national security is not prepared to face all these [challenges],"
Aivazian said.

Back in Margara, however, the focus is less on security challenges and
more on what life is like on the other side of the border. While the
bridge was built in the late 1960s, it was not used until 1993, when
it opened for a few days after the start of the Turkish blockade for
international organizations to deliver wheat and medicine to Armenia
amidst wartime shortages. No cars have since traveled over the bridge.

Talks on re-opening the border picked up again last summer when
President Serzh Sargsyan invited Turkish Prime Minister Abdullah Gul
to watch a World Cup-qualifying match in Yerevan between Armenia and
Turkey. [For details, see the Eurasia Insight archive]. The Gyumri-Kars
railway, the only line running between the two countries, was even
repaired for Turkish football fans to travel to Yerevan by train,
Gyumri railroad station Deputy Director Valeri Muradian said at the
time. Slight repairs were also made to Margara’s bridge and customs
control point.

But while Margara villagers may still not be able to see their
Turkish neighbors three kilometers away in the village of Alijan,
they can hear them, according to Khachik Asatrian, Margara’s government
chairperson. "We can hear the voices in Alijan when there is a wedding
there. Judging from the voices and the music, there seem to be lots
of Kurds there."

The Russian border guards who survey Armenia’s Turkish border issue
annual passes for villagers to cross over and farm their land in a
neutral zone, but villager Anna Simonian says that many prefer to not
bother with "all that fuss with the documents." Fear also keeps some
away, although no attack on an Armenian villager has ever occurred,
she added.

Nonetheless, Armenian villagers in Margara have already found one
thing in common with their Turkish neighbors: the chance for a fresh
start if the border reopens.

"Their villages in this part [of the country] are very poor as well,
judging from their houses . . . " observed villager Piliposian, whose
house stands at the border. But if the border opens "[t]he villages
will revive, they will do business . . ."

Editor’s Note: Gayane Abrahamyan is a reporter for the ArmeniaNow.com
weekly in Yerevan.

http://www.eurasianet.org

Sociologist Gevorg Poghosian: Turkey And Azerbaijan Are Permanent Pa

SOCIOLOGIST GEVORG POGHOSIAN: TURKEY AND AZERBAIJAN ARE PERMANENT PARTNERS AND CARRY OUT THE SAME POLICY

NOYAN TAPAN
APRIL 16, 2009
YEREVAN

"Keeping its people in ignorance the Turkish government seriously risks
country’s future," Gevorg Poghosian, the President of the Armenian
Sociological Association, Doctor of Sociological Sciences, professor,
considers. Answering questions of then Ararat Center of Strategic
Studies, he stated that the show in Turkish schools of a film about
mass slaughters allegedly organized by the Armenians pursues the goal
of concealing historic truth in order to avoid responsibility.

Answering the question of what conclusions we can draw from Recep
Erdogan’s statement that Turkey’s and Azerbaijan’s positions on the
Nagorno Karabakh conflict completely coincide G. Poghosian said that
these two countries are permanent partners and in essence carry out
the same policy. After that statement, as the sociologist emphasized,
Armenia can continue the policy of rapprochement with Turkey, but at
that, Armenia should absolutely clearly make Turkey understand that
such statements are just unacceptable.

As to RA Prime Minister’s invitation to Turkey to take part in the
construction of a new Armenian nuclear power plant, G. Poghosian
stated that it is just a misunderstanding that should be corrected
quickly. He said that Turkey’s participation in newclear power plant’s
construction will give Armenia nothing except risks and harm.

Azerbaijan Concerned About Possibility Of Seeing New Olympic Competi

AZERBAIJAN CONCERNED ABOUT POSSIBILITY OF SEEING NEW OLYMPIC COMPETITORS IN KARABAKH

PanArmenian
April 15 2009
Armenia

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azerbaijan National Olympic Committee Vice President,
Khazar Isaev comments on Armenian NOC President Gagik Tsaroukyan’s
visit to Stepanakert. "I’m unaware any state named Nagorno Karabakh
Republic. I consider it absurd that Tsaroukyan visits Stepanakert to
conduct negotiations on sports school construction for Armenians to
train Olympic champions."

This fact contradicts RA President Serzh Sargsyan’s statement about
Armenia has no connection with the Nagorno Karabakh Republic.

If that’s true, investing in sports development in Stepanakert and
promotion of Olympic movement in the region is pure chauvinism,"
Azeripost quoted Isaev as saying.

During his visit to Stepanakert, a delegation headed by Armenian
National Olympic Committee President, NA MP and Prosperous Armenia
Party Leader Gagik Tsaroukyan signed an agreement for sports school
construction.

New sports school construction will be launched on a territory adjacent
to Sports and Health complex.

Annual competitions between the sportsmen of Armenia and Nagorno
Karabakh are planned.

Kiro Manoyan: We’re Confident US President Will Recognize The Armeni

KIRO MANOYAN: WE’RE CONFIDENT US PRESIDENT WILL RECOGNIZE THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.04.2009 15:36 GMT+04:00

"We’re confident the US President will use the word Genocide in
his Apr. 24 address and recognize the Armenian Genocide just as he
pledged to. Should he forgo his pledge, both the Armenian Diaspora
and Americans will lose their trust for him," Hay Dat Bureau Director
Kiro Manoyan told a news conference today.

"Turkey will strike an angry pose, but for a couple of months only,
then the things will resume their natural order. We witnessed
similar behavior of Turkey when France recognized the Armenian
Genocide. Turkey would send notes for some time, but then things
calmed down," Moanoyan reminded.

He also stressed that Obama’s words will not determine the course of
negotiations on either NKR conflict settlement or normalization of
Armenian-Turkish ties.

"As for supposed deterioration in American-Turkish relations, they
leave much to be desired ever since Turkish parliament refused to
allow American forces’ passage to Irak through Turkey."

In January 2008 Barack Obama pledged to recognize mass slaughter used
by the Ottoman authorities against defenseless Armenians back in 1915
as Genocide.

The Kosovo Liberation Army Maintained A Network Of Prisons

THE KOSOVO LIBERATION ARMY MAINTAINED A NETWORK OF PRISONS

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.04.2009 18:10 GMT+04:00

The Kosovo Liberation Army maintained a network of prisons in their
bases in Albania and Kosovo during and after the conflict of 1999,
eyewitnesses allege. Only now are the details of what occurred there
emerging.

In a run-down industrial compound with shattered windows and peeling
plaster in Kukes, Albania, trucks sit idle in a courtyard surrounded
by rusted warehouses and a crumbling two-story supply building.

In the middle of the compound stands a cinderblock shack that was
once the office of a mechanical plant that produced everything from
manhole covers to elevator cages.

But, during the NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia, from March to
June 1999, this facility took on another purpose. It was occupied by
a guerrilla force, the Kosovo Liberation Army, KLA, as a support base
for their operations across the border in Serbian-ruled Kosovo.

But the factory was not merely the headquarters for guerrillas fighting
the regime of Slobodan Milosevic to secure the independence of Kosovo
from Serbia.

It assumed more sinister purposes: dozens of civilians, mainly Kosovo
Albanians suspected of collaboration, but also Serbs and Roma were
held captive there, beaten and tortured. Some were killed, their
remains never recovered. The men who allegedly directed the abuses
were officers of the KLA.

It appears that Kukes housed one of a number of secret detention
centers in Albania and Kosovo, and that prisoners were transferred
from one facility to another.

Even after the NATO interventions, a camp was maintained in
Baballoq/Babaloc in Kosovo, holding around 30 Serb and Roma prisoners,
whose current whereabouts are unknown. Other camps in Albania may
have held Serbs kidnapped in Kosovo after the war, according to
four sources.

The names of several alleged perpetrators have been known to UNMIK
for some time. One of them is still holding a high position in the
Kosovo judiciary, Balkan Insight understands.

Bislim Zyrapi, an official of the Kosovo Interior Ministry, who was
responsible for KLA operations in Kukes, told Balkan Insight that
there were no people killed, either at the base or outside of it.

Two of the KLA’s former top leaders rejected the allegations in
separate interviews with the BBC.

Kosovo’s Prime Minister, Hashim Thaci, who was then the political
director of the KLA, and Agim Ceku, former Prime Minister and former
chief of the KLA headquarters, told the BBC they were not aware of any
KLA prisons where captives were abused or where civilians were held.

Thaci said he was aware that individuals had "abused KLA uniforms"
after the war, but said the KLA had distanced itself from such acts. He
added that such abuse was "minimal". Ceku said that the KLA fought a
"clean war".

Karin Limdal, spokeswoman for the EU rule of law mission in Kosovo,
EULEX, told Balkan Insight that the mission is aware of the allegations
concerning the Kukes case, and that prosecutors are looking at the
evidence to see if they can bring indictments.