BAKU: Turkish National Junior Football Team Defeats Armenian Team Wi

TURKISH NATIONAL JUNIOR FOOTBALL TEAM DEFEATS ARMENIAN TEAM WITH BIG SCORE

Trend News Agency
Sept 10 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, 10 September / Trend News corr. R.Ergun / The Turkish
National Junior team (U-21) gained victory over the Armenian team in
the qualification match of the European Championship held at the Ali
Sami Ien stadium in Istanbul.

Fatih Terim, the coach of the Turkish main National team participated
in a revenge match, where the Turkish team won with the score of 4:0.

The Turkish junior team lost the Armenian team with the score of 2:1
at the first match.

Main national football teams of Turkey and Armenia met in Yerevan
a while ago within the framework of the qualification stage of the
World Championship 2010. The Turkish footballers gained victory with
the score of 0:2 at this match.

BAKU: Soccer Diplomacy Brings Turkey’s Gul To Armenia

SOCCER DIPLOMACY BRINGS TURKEY’S GUL TO ARMENIA

AzerNews Weekly
Sept 10 2008
Azerbaijan

The presidents of Turkey and Armenia attended a soccer match together
on Saturday in what was seen as a landmark encounter in Yerevan
designed to help end almost a century of hostility and enhance security
in the Caucasus.

Abdullah Gul became the first Turkish leader to visit Armenia. The
neighboring countries have no diplomatic ties but, rather, a
relationship haunted by the question of whether huge numbers of
ethnic Armenians were killed by Ottoman Turks during World War I in
what Yerevan claims was systematic "genocide." Ankara also condemns
Armenia`s policy of occupying Azerbaijani land.

Attack helicopters escorted Gul`s jet on its arrival and police and
demonstrators lined the traffic-free streets as his motorcade sped
through downtown Yerevan.

The two presidents expressed hope that the 2010 World Cup qualifier,
the first match between the two national teams, would help thaw
relations and foster dialogue.

The initiative has gained new impetus since Russia`s war with Georgia
last month, which raised fears for the security of energy supplies
from the resource-rich Caspian basin to western Europe.

"We hope we will be able to demonstrate goodwill to solve the problems
between our countries and not transfer them to future generations,"
Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian said after hosting Gul.

Sarkisian said Gul had invited him to the return match to be held in
October 2009.

Gul said he hoped the game — which Turkey won 2-0 — would aid
rapprochement and contribute to regional peace and security.

It is indicative that the alleged Armenian "genocide" was not raised
during the Gul-Sarkisian talks.

The Turkish leader told journalists, upon returning to Ankara, that
he considered his visit to Yerevan to have been fruitful.

"My visit broke the psychological barrier in the Caucasus. Sarkisian
took a very important step by inviting me to the match. If I hadn`t
accepted his invitation, the whole world would have said I got scared,"
said Gul.

With regard to the Armenia-Azerbaijan Upper (Nagorno) Garabagh
conflict, he said Turkey could play an important role in settling
the dispute.

"Resolution of the Garabagh problem is the most important issue for
us in the South Caucasus," he said.

Gul said Sarkisian had brought up the Garabagh issue during the talks
first, which he did not expect.

"Quite frankly, I was not expecting such a comprehensive and detailed
discussion on the Garabagh conflict.

"This problem will be solved sooner or later, but 20 to 30 years
should not be wasted on that. The current situation in conducive for
finding a solution," the Turkish leader said.

Commenting on the exchange of views he had with Sarkisian on the
situation in Georgia, and the region as a whole, Gul said he had
managed to rally support for Ankara`s recent proposal to set up a
five-nation union, called the Caucasus Peace and Cooperation Platform.

Gul also said prospects for Turkish-Armenian relations were a focal
point during his meeting in Yerevan. The two countries agreed to
continue discussions about improving bilateral relations, he told
the press.

Turkey has never opened an embassy in Armenia and, in 1993, Ankara
closed its common border with Armenia in a show of solidarity with
Azerbaijan, a Turkic-speaking ally then fighting Armenian-backed
separatists in the Upper Garabagh region.

Armenia continues to occupy Upper Garabagh and seven other Azerbaijani
districts, in defiance of international law. Peace talks have, so
far, made no progress in resolving the dispute. Azerbaijan said it
was not opposed to Gul`s visit to Armenia, as Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov said the decision was an internal affair of Turkey and
its president.

"Azerbaijan cannot, in any way, interfere with the passage of Turkey`s
decision in this regard," he said.

President Gul is scheduled to pay a short visit to Azerbaijan
on Wednesday during which he will meet with his counterpart Ilham
Aliyev. Further, Gul is to head to the United States on September 20,
Turkish media reported.

Matthew Bryza, US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, who co-chairs
the OSCE Minsk Group brokering a settlement to the Garabagh conflict,
said Gul`s visit to Armenia would assist in finding a solution to
the long-running dispute.

"The visit will promote a political settlement to maintain Azerbaijan`s
territorial integrity," Bryza added.

Yet, even as the two presidents sat together in Hrazdan stadium,
the challenges were obvious.

Armenian fans booed the Turkish national anthem and dozens
of demonstrators held torches and flowers in a silent vigil at an
imposing monument to the alleged genocide of Armenians on a hillside
behind the stadium.

Protesters in the streets held banners saying, "1915 – Never Again"
and "We Demand Justice."

Armenia insists that 1.5 million Armenians died at the hands of
Ottoman Turks, and Yerevan insists Ankara should recognize the
killings as an act of genocide. Turkey rejects the claims, saying
that 300,000 Armenians, along with at least as many Turks, died in
the civil strife that emerged when Armenians took up arms in a bid
for independence in eastern Anatolia.

Public surveys in Armenia have revealed opposition to the Turkish
president`s visit, which came following an invitation from the Armenian
president. Older Armenians are the most staunchly opposed and claim
that Turks have always been hostile to Armenians.

`Turks hate us. Now we are imploring them to come here. What do we
need them for?` is a commonly held view.

Further, a Turkish opposition leader has emphatically criticized
President Gul for visiting Armenia.

Deniz Baykal, who chairs Turkey`s Republican People`s Party (CHP),
suggested ironically, prior to the visit, that if Gul was heading to
Yerevan, he might as well lay a wreath at the monument to the victims
of the alleged genocide. "By doing so, he would make those urging him
to visit Yerevan even more happy." Baykal recalled that Gul had spoken
against a 1993 visit to Ankara by Armenian leader Levon Ter-Petrosian
at the invitation of then-Turkish President Suleyman Demirel.

"President Gul`s words, 15 years ago, contradict what he says now and
his approaches today," the opposition leader said. "What has changed
since then? Has Armenia recognized Turkey`s borders and relinquished
its territorial claims against us, or has it given up its `genocide`
claims? Has it put an end to the occupation of Upper Garabagh? None
of this happened, hence, nothing has changed. The only thing that
has changed is that a person who has forgotten what he said in the
past is currently Turkey`s president."

But Russia`s decision last month to send its forces into Georgia, an
ex-Soviet state which borders both Armenia and Turkey, has convinced
many that it is time for Ankara and Yerevan to put their differences
aside.

Gul said these events made his trip "especially important."

Observers believe that normalizing relations could greatly enhance
Turkey`s role as a regional power, as energy flows from the Caspian
Sea, as well as to increase Western influence in the South Caucasus.

Landlocked Armenia could also derive enormous benefits from the opening
of the frontier with its large neighbor and the restoration of a key
rail link.

Currently, western-backed pipelines shipping oil and gas from the
Caspian Sea to Turkey`s Mediterranean coast bypass Armenia and bend
north, instead, to travel through Georgia.

`Symbolic nature` Azerbaijani analysts have commented on Ankara`s
accepting Yerevan`s invitation and analyst Rasim Musabayov said Gul`s
visit was merely of a symbolic nature.

"The Turkish side is trying to demonstrate that it is not holding
a grudge, that it is ready to solve outstanding issues through
dialogue. Nonetheless, those assuming that diplomatic relations will
be forged between the two countries at the conclusion of a meeting
lasting four to five hours are mistaken."

Rather, Musabayov said Gul`s visit was an indication of efforts to move
a Turkey-Armenia dialogue to a higher level. Thus, whereas discussions
have previously been held only between foreign ministers, they are
now being raised to the level of presidents. "If dialogue continues
on the presidential level, the opening of the Turkish-Armenian border
may become possible."

Another analyst, Rasim Aghayev, says the Turkish leader`s visit to
Yerevan was bad news for Azerbaijan.

"The visit will lead to the emergence of trade transactions between
Turkey and Armenia, which will ultimately bring about establishment
of broader economic and cultural relations," he said.

Aghayev predicts that, after Gul`s visit, Turkey will begin pursuing
a new policy toward Armenia, and Azerbaijan will have to seek other
means to settle the Garabagh conflict.

Tight security Turkish media reported that President Gul wore a
bulletproof vest under his suit while visiting Armenia.

According to an agreement reached between the Turkish and Armenian
security agencies, security was heightened in Yerevan to protect Gul
during the visit. The car President Gul traveled in while in Armenia
was brought from Turkey and was equipped with specially installed
electronic and security enhancements. At the stadium, the Turkish
president`s bench was enclosed by four-sided bulletproof glass to
avert potential assassination attempts.

Under the agreement reached, Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard
Nalbandian greeted President Gul upon arrival. The Turkish delegation
headed to the Armenian President`s Palace through a specially created,
secure corridor. After a one-on-one meeting of Presidents, Gul and
Sarkisian, the two leaders, headed to the soccer match. Gul returned
home immediately following the game.

Armenia To Be Able To Receive 2,5 Bln Cub M Of Natural Gas From Iran

ARMENIA TO BE ABLE TO RECEIVE 2,5 BLN CUB M OF NATURAL GAS FROM IRAN STARTED NOVEMBER 2008

ArmInfo
2008-09-10 13:54:00

ArmInfo. Armenia will be able to receive to 2,5 bln cub m of natural
gas from Iran started November, 2008, RA Minister of Energy and
Natural Resources Armen Movsisyan told journalists today.

He said that it will become possible due to increase of the flow
capacity of Iran-Armenia gas pipeline at Kajaran-Yerevan section. The
minister also said that construction at this section of the gas
pipeline has been mainly completed and the pipeline’s testing will
shortly begin. A. Movsisyan added that the Iranian gas will be used
by Armenia in case of necessity which may occur under circumstances
of insuperable force when supplies of the Russian gas to Armenia will
be reduced or stopped for any reasons. He recalled that Iran-Armenia
gas pipeline was built as an alternative to the northern main gas
pipeline through which Armenia receives gas from Russia through
Georgia’s territory. To note, under the agreement, Iran will supply
1,1 bln cub m of gas to Armenia started 2009, and started 2019 – to
2,3 bln cub m of gas per year. Armenia will pay for gas by electric
energy based on 3 kWh per 1 cub m. The gas excesses may be used for
Armenia’s auxiliaries.

According To Nerses Yeritsian, A1+ And Noyan Tapan Tv Companies Were

ACCORDING TO NERSES YERITSIAN, A1+ AND NOYAN TAPAN TV COMPANIES WERE DEPRIVED OF AIR DUE TO LACK OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BY POLITICAL FORCES

Noyan Tapan

Se p 9, 2008

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 9, NOYAN TAPAN. On September 9, the RA National
Assembly discussed the proposal of making amendment to the law
On Television and Radio by the government, according to which, no
tenders of TV and radio broadcasting licensing will be announced
until July 20, 2010. The TV companies, whose licence validity term
expires until January 2010, can pretend to prolongation of validity
term of that licence.

According to Nerses Yeritsian, the RA Minister of Economy presenting
the bill, by doing so an attempt is made to create favorable conditions
for passing to broadcasting digital system in Armenia. According to
him, Armenia has joined the Agreement of the Union of International
Telecommunication endorsed during the Radiocommunication Regional
Conference held in 2006 in Geneva, according to which, 2015 has been
fixed a deadline for passing to the digital broadcasting system. The
solution proposed by the legislative initiative, according to the
Minister, will permit to fluently pass from analogue to digital
broadcasting system of radio and TV broadcasts in the territory of
Armenia avoiding the process of temporary and needless licensing at
the transitional stage.

N. Yeritsian said that the validity terms of all licences given
so far expire in 2010, and companies, the term of whose licences
expired earlier as a result of relicensing will not gain advantage
over companies whose licence term expired later.

The government considers urgent adoption of the law, as the term of
ALM TV company’s licence expires on October 4.

The Minister also said that the licence is given for seven years and
if a short-term licensing process is held, the companies can incur
economic losses.

Deputy Viktor Dallakian not disputing the necessity of technical
reequipment said that this bill has a political implication and
is aimed at depriving the A1+ and Noyan Tapan TV companies of the
possibility of returning on air.

He especially mentioned the A1+ TV company, as lately the European
Court of Human Rights has made a decision on creating a possibility
to give air to it.

Armen Martirosian, the head of the Zharangutiun (Heritage) faction,
in his turn, said that all TV companies should be given equal
possibilities for acting and whether they will be able to remain
in the broadcasting sphere or not – let it be decided during a free
competition.

Ernest Soghomonian, a member of the Bargavach Hayastan (Prosperous
Armenia) faction, said that government’s proposal has no political
goal. According to him, the A1+ and Noyan Tapan TV companies were in
a very poor condition, and the political forces these TV companies
served should have provided financial assistance to these media.

Minister Nerses Yeritsian also expressed the same thought mentioning
that before politicizing the issue the opposition should solve
the problems of technical equipment of the above mentioned TV
companies. The Minister stated that the legislative initiative proposed
by the government has nothing in common with the issue of providing
air to the A1+ and Noyan Tapan TV companies.

Noyan Tapan center’s commentary:

The Noyan Tapan information center in response to the above mentioned
speech Minister of Economy Nerses Yeritsian made on September 9 in the
RA National Assembly states that the Noyan Tapan information-analytical
center, as well as the Noyan Tapan TV company making part of it have
never served any political force or party in the 17 years of their
existence and have been guided only by the principle of providing true,
reliable and operative information to the public. As regards the issue
of TV company’s technical equipment, in the period of tenders Noyan
Tapan’s technical equipment was not inferior to the technical equipment
of other TV companies receiving licences in the same tenders at that
time. The honorable Minister, apparently, is not aware of the above
mentioned. And considering the technical financing of TV companies
the task of these or those political forces (the honorable Minister,
apparently, is not aware, either, that it is prohibited by the RA law)
and dividing TV companies into "his own people" and "oppositionists"
the Minister in fact confesses that the issue of providing a licence to
TV companies has been solved not in conditions of a free competition,
but as a result of the political decision of the authorities.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=117213

ANKARA: UEFA Boss Thanks Turkey And Armenia

UEFA BOSS THANKS TURKEY AND ARMENIA

Today’s Zaman
Sept 9 2008
Turkey

Turkey beat Armenia 2-0 in a 2010 FIFA World Cup qualifying match in
Yerevan on Saturday. This was an ordinary match, but what made this
fixture somewhat exceptional, however, was the historical context of
the game.

One has to imagine two countries with a common border, who ignore each
other and who have not had any relations for 90 years — certainly
a unique case in world terms.

UEFA President Michel Platini underlined the importance of the
occasion, saying: "Soccer is our world. Consequently, it is not our
intention to analyze the reasons for this state of affairs. However,
it must be emphasized today that soccer has, once again, brought people
closer together. A president of Turkey has visited Armenia for the
first time. The Turkish national anthem was played and respected in
Yerevan. There was great emotion on both sides and my representatives
in Yerevan tell me that the match was played in an exemplary spirit,"
according to a report on uefa.com.

"I would like to take this opportunity to thank the two associations
and the players. They have provided an extraordinary example of the
power of sport’s spirit and have sent out a considerable message of
hope in a region which has a great need of such messages," he added.

Russia Talks Tough, But Is Moscow Swaying Opinion On Georgia?

RUSSIA TALKS TOUGH, BUT IS MOSCOW SWAYING OPINION ON GEORGIA?
Sergei Blagov

EurasiaNet
Sept 8 2008
NY

Russia has long sought to establish an organization that could
act as a geopolitical counterbalance to the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization. In the aftermath of its most recent summit, it is clear
that Moscow is pinning much of its hopes on the Collective Security
Treaty Organization. Whether the grouping of six formerly Soviet
republics is ready to fulfill Russia’s expectations remains an open
question, however.

CSTO leaders issued a statement following the group’s September
5 summit in Moscow that largely supported Russia’s version of
the conflict in Georgia. [For background see the Eurasia Insight
archive]. At the same time, to the Kremlin’s frustration, CSTO states
refrained from endorsing Russia’s recognition of Abkhazia’s and South
Ossetia’s independence.

Despite the diplomatic disappointment surrounding the independence
issue, Russia received something more important from the CSTO, which
includes Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan
and Uzbekistan. The group’s statement came out forcefully against
the further eastward expansion of NATO. In effect, the group warned
the United States and European Union that there would be trouble if
the West tried to follow-up on its long-stated commitment to bring
Georgia and Ukraine into NATO’s fold.

"The serious potential for conflict is accumulating in the direct
vicinity of the CSTO’s zone of responsibility," the statement
said. "The member states of the CSTO call on NATO to weigh all the
possible consequences of expanding the alliance to the East."

Russia followed up on its CSTO success with an announcement that
Russian forces would withdraw from Georgia proper following the
deployment of an international peacekeeping force in and around
Abkhazia and South Ossetia. [For background see the Eurasia Insight
archive]. Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev worked out the preliminary
withdrawal agreement during September 8 talks with French President
Nicolas Sarkozy.

If the new plan proceeds as originally envisioned, a
peacekeeping/monitoring force would be deployed in the conflict
zone no later than October 1. The withdrawal of Russian troops from
checkpoints set up on Georgian territory would commence within 10
days after the monitors were in place. The United States and some EU
member states have accused Moscow of violating a six-point ceasefire
plan that was brokered in August. On September 7, however, French
Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner provided Moscow with a face-saving
way to move forward with the latest arrangement negotiated by Sarkozy
and Medvedev. Kouchner attributed the differences surrounding the
six-point plan to a translation error.

According to a report distributed by the Interfax news agency, Medvedev
was vague when it came to the details of the new plan. He specifically
avoided giving precise information concerning the composition and
size of the monitoring contingent, saying only that it would include
200 EU representatives. There appeared to be a possibility that the
new force could comprise a majority of Russian peacekeepers.

In announcing the new preliminary plan, Medvedev kept up a steady
drumbeat of anti-Georgia and anti-American rhetoric. He assailed
Washington for supposedly encouraging Tbilisi to open a military
offensive against South Ossetia. He went on to accuse Georgian
President Mikheil Saakashvili of taking "idiotic action," according
to a report distributed by the Komsomolskaya Pravda website.

"Now all of Georgia is paying for it," Medvedev continued. "It is
one of the examples of decisions based on a unipolar world, when
one is sure that there is someone behind him, who will help if one
doesn’t have enough strength. It will not work – one should behave,
act under international law. Then everything will be fine. This
is why I believe it is very important to develop new approaches to
international security."

The new approach referred to by Medvedev would seem to be the
CSTO. Following the group’s summit, Medvedev urged stronger foreign
policy coordination among member states, and suggested that the
organization’s "military element" be strengthened. "The Organization
evidently has its rights and duties, including issues of self-defense
[and the] liquidation of consequences of armed conflicts," he
said. In connection with the Russian desire for the CSTO to beef up
its strategic capacity, the organization announced a comprehensive
military modernization plan.

Immediately following the CSTO summit, Medvedev issued a statement
that was Cold War-like in tone, insisting that member states would
guarantee their own territorial integrity and non-interference in
their internal affairs. But he conceded that it would be up to each
individual CSTO member to decide whether or not to recognize South
Ossetia and Abkhazia or not.

Russia’s Cold War-like rhetoric was again on display on September
8. Russia’s ambassador to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, announced that Moscow
would sever all ties with the Atlantic alliance if the Brussels-based
organization ever offered Georgia a Membership Action Plan, which
is a precursor to full membership. Russia also announced that it
would engage in some gun-boat diplomacy of its own by sending a
naval task force to the Caribbean Sea for joint exercises with the
Venezuelan navy.

While Russia has succeeded in recent days in fostering an aura of
strength in its dealings with the United States and EU, some Russian
commentators continue to wonder whether Russia can win the public
relations battle that is now raging over Georgia.

"We [Russia] are struggling with the world for the recognition of
our actions in Georgia. Success has so far only been achieved on the
linguistic level: condemnation is a strong political gesture, but
it does not oblige anyone to recognize South Ossetia and Abkhazia,"
wrote political analyst Aleksandr Samarin in a September 8 commentary
published by Nezavisimaya Gazeta. "On the other hand, the EU decided
not to impose sanctions on Russia for now. We ignore ‘for now’ and
stress ‘not to impose.’"

Other media outlets have expressed doubt over whether Moscow can
realize its CSTO ambitions. The CSTO nations denounced Georgia, but
they are not prepared to follow Russia till the "victorious end,"
noted one commentary published by Moskovsky Komsomolets.

Editor’s Note: Sergei Blagov is a Moscow-based specialist in CIS
political affairs.

BAKU: Azerbaijan Milli Majlis Chairman Meets Hungary’s National Asse

AZERBAIJAN MILLI MAJLIS CHAIRMAN MEETS HUNGARY’S NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEAKER IN BAKU

State Telegraph Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan
September 7, 2008 Sunday

Chairman of the Azerbaijan Milli Majlis (Parliament) Ogtay Asadov
met Friday with visiting Speaker of the Hungary `s National Assembly
Mrs. Katalin Szili.

O. Asadov said integration into Europe was one of Azerbaijan`s foreign
policy priorities. He stressed documents signed during reciprocal
visits by the two countries` top officials had created a legal base
for expanding bilateral cooperation. Azerbaijan plays an important
role in ensuring Europe`s energy security, and the country backs the
Nabucco project, underscored Mr. Asadov.

Touching upon parliamentary relations, Mr. Asadov noted friendship
groups had been established in both countries` legislative bodies. He
added parliamentary relations would also contribute to enhancing
other spheres including economic cooperation between the two countries.

The Milli Majlis Speaker also briefed his counterpart on the
Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh calling it a
major obstacle to not only Azerbaijan`s, but also the region`s
development. The conflict must be settled on strict maintenance of
Azerbaijan`s territorial integrity and in accordance with international
norms, and we hope Hungary will support official Baku in this question,
Asadov underlined.

Katalin Szili, in turn, described Azerbaijan as the most developed
country in the South Caucasus saying her country is curious about
cooperation with it. He notified Hungary`s embassy will be opened
in Baku in October. She also stressed the importance of expanding
parliamentary relations and intensifying reciprocal visits by both
countries` officials.

Mrs. Szili expressed hope Hungary-Azerbaijan cooperation would further
continue to expand.

The sides also discussed other issues of mutual interest.

Milli Majlis Deputy Speaker Bahar Muradova, Head of the Administration
of the Milli Majlis Safa Mirzayev were also present in the meeting.

La visite de Gul en Armenie diversement accueillie en Turquie

Les Echos, France
5 septembre 2008 vendredi

La visite de Gül en Arménie diversement accueillie en Turquie

Le président turc d’Abdullah Gül se rendra à Erevan demain à
l’invitation de son homologue arménien Serge Sarkissian pour assister
au match Arménie-Turquie de qualification pour le Mondial 2010 de
football. Il sera le premier chef d’Etat turc à se rendre en Arménie,
depuis l’indépendance de ce pays en 1991, alors qu’un profond
différend oppose les deux nations sur la question du génocide arménien
et qu’elles n’ont pas de relations diplomatiques. Alors que la presse
turque a salué le caractère « historique » du voyage, l’opposition a
multiplié les critiques. « Cette visite est totalement injustifiée
alors que le peuple turc est injustement accusé d’avoir commis un
génocide et que l’Arménie ne montre aucun signe de renoncer à sa
politique à cet égard », a estimé Tunca Toskay, du parti nationaliste
MHP.

BAKU: Abdullah Gul To Watch Armenia-Turkey Match In Bullet-Proof Jac

ABDULLAH GUL TO WATCH ARMENIA-TURKEY MATCH IN BULLET-PROOF JACKET BEHIND BULLET-PROOF GLASS

Azeri Press Agency
Sept 5 2008
Azerbaijan

Ankara – APA. Details of Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s visit to
Armenia have been made public. APA reports that Armenian Foreign
Minister Edward Nalbandian will meet Abdullah Gul in Zvartnots airport.

Before getting off the plane Abdullah Gul will put on bullet-proof
jacket. Turkish delegation will go to Armenian President’s Palace
through special security corridor. Following one-on-one meeting of
the presidents Serzh Sarkisian will give iftar (the meal that breaks
the fast each evening at sundown) in honor of Abdullah Gul. Iftar
time will be at 18.33 (Turkey time) in Yerevan tomorrow.

After breaking his fast, Abdullah Gul along with Serzh Sarkisian
will go to Razdan stadium, where Armenia-Turkey match will take
place. Security issues of the visit have been thoroughly agreed with
Turkey. The car that will be used by Abdullah Gul and the special
device that will control the road leading from the airport to the
President’s Palace and stadium have been sent from Turkey. The section
of the stadium, where Gul will be watching the game will be protected
by bulletproof glass as a measure against a possible assassination
attempt. So, Abdullah Gul, who will leave for Yerevan to watch live
Armenia-Turkey match, will actually watch it behind the glass.

ANKARA: US Hails Gul’s Decision To Visit To Armenia

US HAILS GUL’S DECISION TO VISIT TO ARMENIA

Today’s Zaman
Sept 4 2008
Turkey

The United States on Thursday lauded a visit to be paid by Turkish
President Abdullah Gul to Armenia, reported the Anatolia news agency.

Mark Toner, spokesman for the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs
of the US Department of State, said the United States welcomed Gul’s
acceptance an invitation of Armenian President Serzh Sarksyan to
watch a World Cup qualifier in the Armenian capital of Yerevan.

Toner said the United States appreciated the courage of the two
presidents to take steps to foster regional peace and prosperity. The
spokesman expressed hope that the historic meeting would be a step
toward the normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations.

Sarksyan had invited Gul to watch a World Cup qualifier to be
played between the national teams of Turkey and Armenia in Yerevan
on Saturday.

A statement released by Gul’s office on Wednesday indicated that the
president had accepted the invitation.