AGBU, Assembly Welcome New Consul General of Armenia To Los Angeles

Armenian Assembly of America
1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-393-3434
Fax: 202-638-4904
Email: [email protected]
Web:

PRESS RELEASE

March 20, 2009
Contact: Michael A Zachariades
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (202) 393-3434

AGBU, ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY WELCOME NEW CONSUL GENERAL OF ARMENIA TO
LOS ANGELES

Los Angeles, CA – In a joint event held at the Pasadena Armenian General
Benevolent Union (AGBU) Alex Manoogian Center, the Armenian Assembly of
America (Assembly) and the AGBU Southern California District Committee
(SCDC) welcomed the new Consul General of Armenia, Mr. Grigor
Hovhannisyan. AGBU-SCDC President, Berj Shabazian, and Armenian
Assembly Western Region Director, Yeghig Keshishian, were in attendance
to welcome the guests on behalf of both organizations.

Over one hundred of the most active members from both the AGBU and the
Assembly were present to meet the Consul General and listen to his
remarks. "The Assembly is pleased to welcome the new Consul General of
Armenia, and we are confident the enthusiasm and work experience that
Mr. Hovhannisyan brings will greatly assist in tackling some of the
issues affecting the Armenian-American community in the U.S.," stated
Keshishian.

He added, "Through our continued partnerships with other community
organizations and the relationships we have fostered by working closely
with the capable staff at the Consul General’s office in Los Angeles, I
am confident the Assembly will be able to strengthen our presence in
California and stay focused on the work that lies ahead." In addition
to our political efforts, the Western Region office coordinates outreach
strategy with community leaders to enhance the image of the Armenian
community through various events and community forums designed to raise
awareness of local issues affecting Armenian-Americans.

Established in 1972, the Armenian Assembly of America is the largest
Washington-based nationwide organization promoting public understanding
and awareness of Armenian issues. The Assembly is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt
membership organization.

###

NR#2009-018

www.aaainc.org

More Armenian Ghosts (Again)

MORE ARMENIAN GHOSTS (AGAIN)

GetReligion.org
g/?s=Hrant&submit.x=0&submit.y=0
March 20 2009

Trust me, I realize that what I am about to write falls into the
"there he goes again, saying the same old things" category. I wish
that wasn’t the case, but I know that it is.

That’s OK. I still think that there are religion ghosts — millions
of them — in all of that bitter debate about whether Turkey did or
did not commit genocide against the nation’s Armenians in the early
20th century.

Yes, ethnicity was a major factor. Yes, politics was involved. But
so was the ancient Christian faith of the Armenian Orthodox and the
unique, at times mysterious, "secular" brand of Islam advocated by
the Turks. To say otherwise is simply bizarre.

The situation is, of course, horribly complex and emotional. Disputes
mixing money, religion, politics and ethnicity usually are. But it
doesn’t help to gouge the soul out of this still bleeding body.

If you doubt what I am saying, try running a Google search for this
hame — "Hrant Dink." Or just click here, scroll down, and read a
bit. Then read some more.

However, if you click here and read a recent Los Angeles Times report
about the genocide debate, you will learn absolutely nothing about
the role that religion has played in this old, old story that is
now haunting the White House. This isn’t a conflict that includes a
religion angle, don’t you know? Here’s the top of this haunted report:

The Obama administration is hesitating on a promised presidential
declaration that Armenians were the victims of genocide in the early
20th century, fearful of alienating Turkey when U.S. officials badly
want its help.

President Obama and other top administration officials pledged during
the presidential campaign to officially designate the 1915 killings of
Armenians by the Ottoman Turks as genocide. Many Armenian Americans,
who are descendants of the victims and survivors, have long sought
such a declaration.

But the administration also has been soliciting Ankara’s help on
Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and other security issues amid Turkish
warnings that an official U.S. statement would imperil Turkey’s
assistance. Administration officials are considering postponing a
presidential statement, citing progress toward a thaw in relations
between Turkey and neighboring Armenia.

So, what was the alleged genocide all about? Here is one chunk of
facts from this report:

An estimated 1.5 million Armenians were victims of planned killings
by the Ottoman Turks as the empire was dissolving during World War I,
an episode historians have concluded was a genocide. But Turkey and
some of its supporters contend that the deaths resulted from civil
war and unrest and that their numbers were exaggerated. …

Obama declared repeatedly during his campaign that the killings were
genocide. Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary
Rodham Clinton are on record with similar positions. But the Obama
administration would like to use Turkey as part of the military supply
line for Afghanistan. It also would like more help regarding Iraq,
Iran’s nuclear program, Russia and Mideast peace.

The current government of Turkey is very nervous about this issue. This
is no surprise. But why?

The bottom line question: Is this simply about nationalism and ethnic
pride? Really? Read the story and try to find even a hint that there
is more to the conflict than that.

http://www.getreligion.or

Turkey: The Prospect Of Becoming International Energetic Centre

TURKEY: THE PROSPECT OF BECOMING INTERNATIONAL ENERGETIC CENTRE
Sargis Harutyunyan

tics&nid=1702
19 March 2009

According to the special report "Turkey’s Energy Strategy"1 presented
by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Turkey in 2008, this country is
in close vicinity of 72,7% of proven oil reserves and 71,8% of proven
natural gas Taking into account the well-known geographic advantages
of Turkey it becomes clear which are the strategic objectives of
that country.

Though in previous years there a lot of work was done to
make Turkey the international energetic centre and the oil
pipeline "Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyran" which was opened in 2006-2007 and
"Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum" gas pipeline and Turkey-Greece Interconnector
are first of all to serve international projects, but there are serious
reasons to believe that the main developments concerning that issue
are still to come.

Even today there are several factors, which speak to the tangible
growth of the role of the Turkey as the intermediary country in the
international energetic system.

Mainly after the Russian-Georgian war and recent gas conflict between
Russia and Ukraine European states began to take more seriously the
idea of getting Middle East, Caspian and Central Asian utilities
through the territory of Turkey. For example, in the issue of
natural gas the Europeans suppose that they have three alte rnatives
to Russia, i.e. Norway, Algeria and Turkey2, but even today it is
clear that the first two are not simply able to supply the necessary
amount of gas, so that it would efficiently lessen the dependence on
"Gazprom"3. Meanwhile, in the line of Turkey they get the access
to almost the half of the world’s proven gas reserves4. Of course,
in the past the Turkish direction has also been topical for Europe
but the new item is that now they reconsider the time schedule and
we are still to see the new indices5.

The second important factor is the American-Iranian and
European-Iranian negotiations and the end of the Iraqi campaign of
the US, which is planned for 2011. In case if those two processes
have a successful result European consumers may get the access to
two countries (Iran and Iraq) with reach utilities. Together those
countries possess 20,5% of world proven oil reserves and 17,5%
of proven gas reserves6. But the point is that for Europe and the
United States Turkey, in fact, is the only convenient option for the
transportation of that oil and gas to the European Union and to lessen
its dependence on Russia. For example the aim to reach the agreement
in strategic sphere of energy must be regarded as one of the reasons
of the current negotiations between the US and Iran. Energetic is
the only sphere, perhaps, which creates an opportunity for serious
agreements between Iran,20the USA and Europe.

And finally, the third factor is the aspiration of Kazakhstan and
mainly of Turkmenistan7 to enter western markets. Though till now
Russia has managed successfully to keep its control over energy
capabilities of Central Asian countries, one should not exclude
that the "opening" of Iran will create an opportunity for the US and
Europe to get to the energy resources of Central Asia. This is still
insuperable factor for Washington and Brussels the Azerbaijani-Caspian
and Pakistan-Afghanistan-Central Asia directions.

The aspiration of Turkey to become an international energetic centre
is not restricted to mainly energetic or financial aims. It is not a
mere chance that on January 2009 in Brussels during the talks with
the spokespersons of the EU on the possible accession of Turkey to
the European Union, the prime-minister Erdogan connected the issues of
the expediency of the "Nabucco", which will be built on the territory
of Turkey, and the accession of Ankara to the EU.

Of course, the problem of "Nabucco" can hardly have any essential
influence on the prospects of the accession of Turkey to the EU. It
seems unlikely that Ankara pins its hopes on it. This step by Erdogan
pursues the aim to show the approaches formed in the foreign policy of
Turkey while relating with the countries, which import energy carriers
and in the future with the countries, which sell those energy carriers;
to use the opportunities offered to an intermediary country.

If we try to formulate briefly that innovation, then Ankara intends
to bring the facilities of the country, which is an energetic center,
to the level of geostrategic position and military and political
capabilities, and this will only attach weight to the country in the
regional and global relations.

Though at present Turkey due to its inner capacities supplies only 30%
of its energy demand and the pattern of the main energy carriers are
as following:

The amount of the consumed, produced and imported oil and natural gas
in Turkey Oil, thousand barrels/ per day 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Con- sumption 630.58 629.07 626.53 666.88
618.62 657.73 644.97 661.37 659.33 677.62 690.55 Production 67.23
66.13 58.38 51.42 46.83 47.09 45.82 42.93 45.46 43.95 45.53 Import
563.35 562.94 568.15 615.46 571.79 610.64 599.16 618.44 613.87 633.67
645.02 The proven oil reserves of Turkey/ billion barrels 0.260 0.331
0.317 0.299 0.296 0.296 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300

Natural gas: billion cubic meters annually 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Con- sumption 12.360 13.053 15.800 18.710
20.110 22.182 26.714 28.307 34.525 39.328 N/A Production 0.317 0.714
0.921 0.807 0.392 0.475 0.707 0.867 1.132 1.142 N/A Import 12.089
12.478 15.182 18.135 19.871 21.578 26.046 27.410 33.5 14 N/A N/A
The natural gas reserves of Turkey/ billions of cubic meters 11.142
11.035 11.821 11.214 11.071 11.071 10.714 10.714 10.714 10.714 10.714
Source:US Energy Information AdministrationO~I

There are at least two directions where Turkey tries to take over
the central role:

the import of the oil to the international markets The supply of Near
East or Caspian-Central Asian natural gas to the European Union The
decision of Ankara to initiate the development of nuclear energy,
perhaps, at the initial phase will have a local significance8, but
it should not be excluded that Turkey have a goal to take part in the
electric power buy and sell in the Central Asian and Balkan markets,
where almost in all the countries the economic growth dynamics can
be observed.

Oil One may say that Turkey has been involved in the sale of the
"black gold" since the beginning of the 20th century, when the Caspian
oil started to flow from the main oil terminal of the Russian Empire
Batumi through Bosporus and Dardanelles to the international market. In
the course of time the significance of the straits has grown and today
that dynamics keep going. Thus if in 1996 60 million tons of oil were
transported through Bosporus and Dardanelles then in 2006 the amount
of oil constituted 143.4 million tons. It is expected that this year
that number will vary between 190-200 million tons9.

But Ankara20started to think about the role of intermediary country
in the international oil market as far back as 1977, when "Kirkuk
(Iraq)-Ceyhan (Turkey)" oil pipeline was opened. The usage of the
pipeline was on the hold because of the war in Iraq in 2003. Later the
usage of "Kirkuk-Ceyhan" had been interrupted for many times because
of the attacks by Iraqi fighters. Though the technical feasibility of
the pipeline allows supplying 1.6 million barrels of oil, but at the
end of 2007 150-200 thousand barrels of oil were supplied to Turkish
seaport Ceyran. In 2008 that number had grown to 400 thousand. In the
near future, anyway, the pipeline can operate full out. On January 7,
2009 the minister of oil of Iraq Hussein al-Shahristani stated that
they were going to post an international tender for 9 biggest oil
pools and 2 biggest gas pools.

According to the presented calculations, if those gas pools start to
be used then daily oil production will rise from present 2.5 million
barrels to 6 million barrels in 4-5 years. Under such conditions
"Kirkuk-Ceyhan" oil pipeline will again operate full out.

As it is known, on July 13, 2006 in Ceyran the opening ceremony
of "Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyan" oil pipeline, which had been built since
the September 2002, took place. Though in August 2008 particularly
because of Georgian-Russian war the pipeline had to suspend its work
for about 20 days,20since the beginning of 2009 it had again started
to operate full out, providing 1 million barrels daily.

According to the memorandum of understanding signed by Italian "Eni"
and Turkish "Calik Energy" energetic companies on September 26,
2005, the parties initiated the construction of "Samsun-Ceyhan" oil
pipeline in 2007, which have to transit Russian and Caspian oil from
Samsun Black Sea port to Ceyhan. According to the plan the pipeline
will be ready in 2010 and its flow capacity will be about 1.5 million
barrels daily.

In accordance with the agreements between the minister of energetic
of Turkey Hilmi Guler and the minister of national infrastructure
of Israel Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, the parties made terms about the
negotiating on the construction of the oil pipeline from Ceyhan to
Israeli seaport Haifa10.

Though in recent period the relations between Turkey and Israel
deteriorated and there is no information about the results of the
negotiations, the fact is that neither of the parties stated about
the suspension of the programme.

Picture 1 Existing and planned big pipelines in Turkey

1. "Kirkuk-Ceyhan" oil pipeline, functions since 1977, maximal flow
capacity 1.6 million barrels daily.

2. "Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan" pipeline, functions since 2006, maximal flow
capacity 1 million barrels daily.

3. "Samsun-Ceyhan" pipeline, planned to start functioning in 2010,
maximal flow capacity 1.5 million barrels daily.

4. "Ceyhan-Haifa" pipeline, on the stage of negotiations.

5. At current moment about 3 millions barrels daily flow through
Bosporus and Dardanelles strait.

Serious investments are made in Turkey in the expanding of oil refining
capacities. According to the available programmes over the next few
years Turkey will double its capabilities in that sphere, mainly
expanding the capacities of the oil refineries in its Mediterranean
seaports (first of all in Ceyhan) up to 2 million barrels daily11.

According to the western sources if the aforementioned programmes are
implemented then Ceyhan will become one of the central points of the
oil market in the world and in accordance with some calculations it
will provide the transition of 5.5% of oil in the world12. According
to other data if all those programmes are implemented then in 2012 6-7%
of oil will flow through the territory of Turkey13.

Natural gas The achievements of Turkey in the sphere of natural gas
transition are even more impressive.

Since 2001 "Tabriz-Ankara" gas pipeline, which on average supplies
Turkey with 7.5 billion cubic meters of natural gas annually, has
been functioning. But in the recent period against the background
of the rapprochement of Turkey and Iran the active negotiations
are under way to supply Iranian gas through the territory of Turkey
to Europe and to 0D build on this purpose new Iranian-Turkish gas
pipeline. On November 17, 2008 after the memorandum of understanding
had been signed with the minister of oil of Iran Gholamhossein Nozari,
the minister of energetic of Turkey Hilmi Gulner stated, that Ankara
would invest about 12 billion in the production of gas on the 22nd,
23rd and 24th sections of the biggest "South Pars" gas field14 and
the construction of gas pipeline from Asaluyeh seaport, which is
situated on the Gulf coast, to Turkish Bazargan. The length of the
pipeline will be about 1.850km15.

Since the December 15, 2006 "Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum" or South Caucasus
Pipeline, which annual transporting capacity is about 8 billion cubic
meters, has been functioning. It is supposed that this pipeline will
supply natural gas from Azerbaijan16 and, it is not excluded, also from
Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan17 to Turkish and then to European markets.

Ankara lays serious hopes especially on Turkmenistan. While
British Â"Gaffney, Cline & Associates LtdÂ" company was auditing
the general gas resources of Turkmenistan, on May 19-20, 2008 the
negotiations between the presidents of Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan
on the possibility of Turkmen gas transition to Turkey through the
territory of Azerbaijan took place in Baku.

In September, after the Georgian-Russian war, the minister of energetic
of Turkey Hilmi Guler and in October prime-minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan visited Ashgaba t. On October 14, 2008 Â"Gaffney, Cline &
Associates LtdÂ" published the results of the audit: the general
amount of gas reserves in Turkmenistan was valued at more than 27.67
trillion. And on November 29 the tripartite negotiations between
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, Ilham Aliev and Abdullah Gul took place;
again on the energetic issues.

"Tabriz-Ankara" and "Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum" gas pipelines connect up
in Erzurum and they will be the main suppliers of "Nabucco" pipeline,
which is going to be built in the near future18.

"Nabucco" will connect Erzurum through the territories of Bulgaria,
Romania and Hungary with the biggest Austrian "Baumgarten" gas
centre. After the first stage of the construction of the gas pipeline
in 2014 it can supply about 8 billion cubic meters, and from 2019,
when the alleged construction of the second stage is finished19,
the discharge capacity of "Nabucco" will be 31 billion cubic meters
annually.

The second biggest gas pipeline, which connects Turkey and Europe,
is Turkey-Greece Interconnector, which was opened on November 18,
2007. Its annual discharge capacity is 11.5 billion cubic meters. It
is planned that the Turkish-Greek gas pipeline will go further in
the direction of Italy as Turkey-Greece-Italy Interconnector, which
construction must be over in 2012.

On November 17, 2005 the Blue Stream gas pipeline, which
connects R ussia and Turkey on the bottom of the Black Sea, was
opened. It is planned that in 2010 the gas pipeline will reach
its full flow capacity, i.e. 16 billion cubic meters annually,
and it is not excluded that it may have its continuation in
Turkey-Bulgaria-Serbia-Croatia-Hungary and Turkey-Lebanon/Turkey-Israel
directions.

There are also two projects, which have to get Egyptian and Iraqi
gas to Turkey.

The first is Â"Arab Gas PipelineÂ", which has to transmit Egyptian gas
through Jordan and Syria to Turkey. The pipeline up to Syria is built
and on January 4, 2008 Ankara and Damascus made terms to extend gas
pipeline to Turkey. Its construction should be over in 2011. According
to preliminary data Turkey will get through that pipeline annually
up to 5 billion cubic meters of natural gas and on the territory of
Turkey Â"Arab Gas PipelineÂ" will connect to Â"NabuccoÂ".

The second project purpose is to transmit Iraqi gas to Europe again
through the territory of Turkey. On August 7, 2007 in Ankara Turkey
and Iraq signed the memorandum of understanding in order to begin talks
on the issue, but till now there is no information about any definite
result. It is possible that the situation may change after putting
into operation new gas pools for which on January 7 an international
tender was posted.

And finally Turkey plans to build at least three terminals for getting
liquefied natural gas (LNG) in its seaports (Izmir, Ceyhan), which will
be able to get natural gas from all over the world. It is known, for
example, that the terminal, which is going to be built near Izmir, will
have to receive more than 7.5 billion cubic meters of gas annually20.

Picture 2 Existing and planned big pipelines in Turkey

1. "Tabriz-Ankara" pipeline, functions since 2001, maximal flow
capacity 7.5 billion cubic meters annually

2. "Blue Stream" pipeline, functions since 2005, maximal flow capacity
16 billion cubic meters annually

3. "Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum" pipeline, functions since 2006, maximal
flow capacity 16 billion cubic meters annually

4. "Turkey-Greece Interconnector", functions since 2006, maximal flow
capacity 11.5 billion cubic meters annually

5. Â"Arab Gas PipelineÂ", planned to start working in 2011.

6. Â"NabuccoÂ" pipeline, planned to start working before 2020,
maximal flow capacity 31 billion cubic meters annually

7. "Turkey-Israel" pipeline; in the stage of negotiations.

8. "Iraq-Turkey" pipeline; in the stage of negotiations.

9. "Asaluyeh (Iran) – Bazargan (Turkey) pipeline; in the stage of
negotiations.

Nuclear energy Over its history the Republic of Turkey has tried
to initiate the development of nuclear energy, but it always faces
various odds: from financial problems to military coups. On November
8, 2007 Turkish parliament passed a bill, which supposes that till
2012 reactors with total capacity 5 thousand megawatt will start
working21. On November 20 of the same year president Abdullah Gul
ratified the bill. On March 24 of the last year the international
tender on the construction of the planned nuclear power plant in the
proximity of Mersin city, which is situated by the Mediterranean Sea,
was posted. In a half of the year, on September 24, 2008 it became
clear that only consortium, which included Russian "Atomstroyexport"
(Â"Ð~P& #xD1;~BомÑ~AÑ~B&#x D1;~@ойÑ~Mк& #xD1;~AпоÑ~@Ñ~B&#x C2;"), "Inter RAO EES"
(Â"Ð~XнÑ~ BеÑ~@ РÐ~PÐ~^ Ð~UЭСÂ"), and Turkish Â"Park TeknikÂ"
companies, made a bid. On December in 2008 the nuclear energy agency
of Turkey (TAEK) stated that the bid, made by the consortium, meets
the requirements. Though later, on January 19, 2009, when it occurred
that the price of one kilowatt of electric energy is much higher
than the present electric energy price at Turkish market22, and in
this context, it was not excluded that the international tender will
again be posted, on January 22 the minister of energetic of Turkey
Hilmi Guler stated that the works continued and the results of the
tender would not be annulated.

According to the information we have, the consortium will build four
Russian Â"ВВЭР -1200B B reactors near Akkuyu settlement, not far
from Mersin. These four reactors together will be able to generate
4.800 megawatt of electric power. The construction of nuclear power
plant will cost Turkey about $7.5 billion. It is planned that it will
have been ready by 201223. In the period of 15 years Turkey will buy
from the consortium about 415.5 billion KW/h electric power and pay
for it $86.3 billion. In accordance with Ankara’s calculations before
2020 the nuclear power plant will produce about 8% of electric power
in Turkey and in 2030 this will rise up to 20%24. Except Akkoyu NPP
Turkish government intends to build two other nuclear power plants. At
current moment the location of only one of those stations is known. It
will locate near the Sinop at Black Sea.

Conclusions and prospects:the connection with the national security
of Armenia The strategy of Turkey to become international energetic
centre pursues two aims.

The first aim is to ensure the proper presence of Ankara in global
decision-making in the ongoing process of the transformation of
international political and economic system. In the past it was done
mainly by being the NATO member and the most important ally of the US
in the Middle East and Muslim world. But in new conditions when the
weakening of NATO and the deterioration of the relations between
Turkey and the US can cause reduction of the weight of Turkey,
Ankara believes that the capabilities introduced to the energetic
centre-country are to compensate those losses.

On the other hand, the energetic strategy of Turkey must be considered
in the context of the changes taking place in regional policy of
the country.

If since the establishment of the Turkish Republic Ankara has been
the strong point of the western world in the Middle East, then today
Turkey tries to take on a key role of the Ottoman Empire in the
Middle East and Ankara’s transformation into the energetic centre
is to enhance the influence of Turkey in the region and direct them
towards Ankara. For example, from this point of view, the decision of
Ankara to initiate the process of the normalization of the relations
with Yerevan is more notable than the unprecedented sharp approach
of the Erdogan government to the actions of Israel in Gaza.

>From the point of view of the prospects, the security system Turkey is
going offer to the changing region (the Middle East, South Caucasus,
and the Balkans) is important. It is obvious that the transformation
of the energetic picture of the region (the transformation of Turkey
into the energetic centre is just it) cannot but cause the changes
in the regional security system. Perhaps "The Caucasian platform of
stability and collaboration" initiated by Ankara is the part of the
supposed offer of Turkey but it is almost out of question that the
main initiatives of20Ankara are still to come. A lot will depend on
the developments in Iraq, in the line of Syrian-Israeli relations,
in the relations with Russia, Iran and Armenia and the developments
in South Caucasus in general.

In case of Armenia, the essential factor is that the "transformation"
of Turkey and the formation of new situation in the Middle East can
"open" that region for us and increase the involvement of Yerevan
in this direction. From the practical point of view this means that
in the near future the developments in the Middle East may have even
more serious impact on the national security system of our country.

1Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Turkey’s Energy
Strategy", 2008.

2Libya may also be regarded as one of those alternatives but, taking
into consideration the fact that this country is only to "open"
for the western companies, Libyan direction is more regarded as a
perspective one.

As for the Liquefied Natural Gas – LNG, which would allow to import
gas from every part of the world, the expensiveness of this option
(today liquefied natural gas terminals are built only in Western
Europe) make it unacceptable for the Eastern part of the European
Union, which is the most dependant on Russian gas.

3Today "Gazprom" provides about 40% , i.e. 140 billions cubic meters,
of natural gas import in the European Union.

4According to the "BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2008"
eight countries of the Persian Gulf (Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi
Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, United Arabian Emirates, Oman) and four
Caspian countries (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan)
together possess 45,05% of proven natural gas reserves of the planet.

5It is known that the annual consumption of natural gas in the
European Union for 2007 was about 500 billion cubic meters, of which
300 billion cubic meters were imported, then the annual consumption
of natural gas in the EU will have been risen to 800 billion cubic
meters by 2020. And this is under the conditions when since 1970 the
production of gas in Europe has been reducing. If 29 years ago Europe
produced 90% of gas it consumed then in 2007 it produced only 40%
(source: Pierre Noel, Â"Beyond Dependence: How to Deal With Russian
GasÂ", November, 2008, European Council on Foreign Relations)

6Source: Â"BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2008Â".

7Here the steps made by Ashgabat recently should be mentioned. First
of all it is referred to the results of the audit of Turkmen natural
gas fields, published on October 14, 2008. The audit was carried out
by British "Gaffney, Cline & Associates Ltd" company. In accordance
with that report the general amount of gas resources in Turkmenistan
was valued at more than 27.67 trillion cubic meters, which ma ke this
country second after Russia (44.60 trillion cubic meters), from the
point of view of the available natural gas reserves. From political
point of view the decision of Ashgabat to publish all the report
should be regarded as claim to play a new role on the international
energy market.

8According to the prognosis of local Turkish authorities in coming
years the growth Turkey will have in energy sector will vary in
the range of 6-8% (source: of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
"Turkey’s Energy Strategy", 2008).

9Source: Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Turkey’s
Energy Strategy", 2008.

10Alongside with the oil pipeline the gas pipeline, water pipe,
high-voltage power line and fiber-optic cable are to be built.

11According to the latest data (for 2007), the amount is 714 thousand
barrels (source: US Energy Information Administration).

12Source: Turkey: Gul OKs Nuclear Plant Legislation, Stratfor,
November 20, 2007.

13Source: Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Turkey’s
Energy Strategy", 2008.

14It is planned that Turkey will produce about 17 billion cubic meters
of natural gas from that sections, and the half of that produced gas
it can use for domestic consumption.

15Iran offers to build separate gas pipeline to Europe through the
territory of Turkey (Â"Persian PipelineÂ"), which, having the length
more than=2 03.200km and costing about $6 billion, will transmit gas
directly to European market.

16Mainly Azerbaijani "Shah Deniz" gas-well, which is situated in the
Caspian Sea and produces about 8 billion cubic meters, is supposed
to supply natural gas for "Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum" gas pipeline.

17With this purpose, in accordance with the plan, the annual flow
capacity of the gas pipeline will have to rise up to 20 billion
cubic meters.

18On the summit, which took place on January 26-27, 2009 in Budapest
and was devoted to the construction of "Nabucco", the decision was
taken that the beginning of the construction of the pipeline is
postponed and it will start in next two years. The cost has also
risen. Instead of previous $9-10 billion it was estimated $11.8-13.1
billion.

19It is planned to put the additional flowing plants on second stage
to increase the flow capacity of the pipeline.

20There is only one terminal near Istanbul for liquefied gas production
in Turkey today, which, for example, in 2004, imported from Algeria
about 4 billion cubic meters of natural gas, and from Nigeria –
about 1.3 billion cubic meters.

21 Let us mention that the specialist in that field from the West
doubt that Turkey will be able to implement that programme by 2012,
especially in the conditions of present financial-economic crisis. But
they add that Ankara can reach its goal for a longer=2 0period.

22Today the price for 1 KW of electric power in Turkey varies in the
range of $0.04-0.14. Meanwhile the consortium offers $0.21. Later
consortium agreed to reconsider and reduce the price.

23On December 13 after the negotiations between Russian president D.

Medvedev and Abdullah Gul Russian media reported that in 2009 the
consortium will get permission to build Akkuyu NPP and the construction
will start in 6 years.

24Source: Saban Kardas, Â"Is the Russian-Led Consortium Trying to
Overcharge Turkey for Its First Nuclear Power Plant?Â", January 26,
2009, Eurasia Daily Monitor.

http://www.noravank.am/en/?page=anali

JICA Mission To Visit Armenia In Early May

JICA MISSION TO VISIT ARMENIA IN EARLY MAY

Noyan Tapan
March 19, 2009

YEREVAN, MARCH 19, NOYAN TAPAN. The RA minister of transport and
communication Gurgen Sargsyan on March 18 received the head of
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Unit for Central
Asia and Caucasus Kenichi Yamatoto. Underlining the importance of
close cooperation with JICA, the minister said that it will promote
development of the Armenian economy.

Speaking about the process of working out a new credit program on
Armenian rural road repairs by JICA, G. Sargsyan noted it is at the
final stage, and the documents will be ready soon.

The JICA representative presented the rural road repairs credit
program in detail, saying that it will amount to 50-100 million USD
and be provided on preferential conditions. He said that a visit of
JICA mission to Armenia is scheduled for early May, during which the
amount and terms of the financing, as well as the conditions of the
credit agreement will be discussed in detail. K. Yamatoto assured
the minister that in case of successful bilateral negotiations,
the credit agreement with Armenia will be signed by the end of 2009.

According to spokeswoman for the RA minister of transport and
communication Susanna Tonoyan, the sides also addressed the problem
of road maintenance, for solution of which JICA is likely to provide
financial and technical assistance.

No Competition On Grant Of Television And Radio Frequencies To Be An

NO COMPETITION ON GRANT OF TELEVISION AND RADIO FREQUENCIES TO BE ANNOUNCED IN ARMENIA UNTIL JUNE 20, 2010

Noyan Tapan
March 19, 2009

YEREVAN, MARCH 19, NOYAN TAPAN. No competition on the grant of
television and radio frequencies will be announced in Armenia until
June 20, 2010. The deputy minister of economy Vahe Danielian said
at the March 19 sitting of the Armenian government that by 2012 all
TV and radio broadcasts shall be carried in Armenia by the digital
system. The purpose of adopting this decision is to create equal
conditions for organizations of the sector so that all of them will
have time to make this change.

V. Danielian said that EU experts will provide technical assistance in
order to make this process as smooth and successful as possible. An
interdepartmental commission has been set up to implement the
program. It is developing digital broadcasting standards.

Elina Danielyan Scores Regular Victory In Grand Prix Tournament

ELINA DANIELYAN SCORES REGULAR VICTORY IN GRAND PRIX TOURNAMENT

PanARMENIAN.Net
18.03.2009 15:26 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Chinese Zhao Xue, with 7,5 points to her score,
stays in the lead despite her draw against Indian Humpy Koneru. Yifan
Hou drew her game against the French Marie Sebag, retaining her
2nd place. The remaining matches resulted in Yildiz Betul Cemre’s
victory over the Chinese CHEN Zhu, Swedish Pia Cramling’s victory
over Georgian Maia Chiburdanidze, Zeinab Mamedjarova’s 7th defeat
from Bulgarian Antoaneta Stefanova.

In the lat two tours of Grand Prix Tournament Elina Danielyan will
face 3 serious rivals: Yifan Hou in the 10 tour and leading Zhao Xue
in the 11th and 12th tours.

Georgia Secession From CIS To Play In Russia’s Hands, Georgian Diplo

GEORGIA SECESSION FROM CIS TO PLAY IN RUSSIA’S HANDS, GEORGIAN DIPLOMAT SAYS

PanARMENIAN.Net
18.03.2009 17:29 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Russia will only benefit by Georgia’s withdrawal
from CIS, by renouncing its liabilities," Georgia’s Ambassador to CIS
Zurab Khonelidze stated, voicing his disapproval of Sahakashvili’s
decision to withdraw from CIS.

The Georgian President had first announced his decision to withdraw
from CIS in August 2008.

"Our country is no longer willing to belong with organization headed
by the state that has occupied Georgia’s territories," Sahakashvili
emphasized

Georgia submitted a petition to withdraw from CIS on Aug. 18, 2008,
yet the withdrawal can be effected only on the expiry of 1 year period
due on Aug. 18, 209.

Armenian Government Does Not Want To Follow Example Of U.S. Administ

ARMENIAN GOVERNMENT DOES NOT WANT TO FOLLOW EXAMPLE OF U.S. ADMINISTRATION

Noyan Tapan
March 18, 2009

YEREVAN, MARCH 18, NOYAN TAPAN. The sums provided by the World Bank
and other international financial organizations more contribute to
enrichment of Armenian banks than to development of small and medium
enterprises, member of "Orinats Yerkir" faction Artsruni Aghajanian
said at the National Assembly on March 18. He called on the government
to give credits to enterprises without participation of banks, thus
ensuring low interest rates of credits.

The minister of finance Tigran Davtian said that under conditions of
the global financial and economic crisis, the rapid response staff set
up at the government provides financial resources to some enterprises,
but it is possible only in exceptional cases. On the whole, according
to the minister, the provision of loans to small and medium enterprises
is outside the government’s competence: like in other countries, it
is done through the banking system. As regards the fact that banks
provide at high interest rates the credits they have received on
preferential conditions, the minister noted that their actions are
justified, taking into account the risks proceeding from the economic
situation in the country.

Disagreeing with the minister’s arguments, the NA deputy reminded
that the U.S. administration allocated 800 billion USD to prevent
the consequences of the crisis.

Hulusi Kilic: Opening Of Armenian-Turkish Border Not A Topic For Dis

HULUSI KILIC: OPENING OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH BORDER NOT A TOPIC FOR DISCUSSION

PanARMENIAN.Net
17.03.2009 21:21 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The opening of the Turkish-Armenia border opening is
not a subject for discussions, says Khulusi Kilich , the Ambassador
of Turkey to Azerbaijan. He mentioned that currently the governments
of Turkey and Armenia are conducting negotiations and it is early to
speak about decisions yet, Trend.az. reports.

Lately the Turkish Sabah has spread information that "Yerevan and
Ankara have settled to regulate the relations, and the results of
these negotiations are due to be announced in April resulting in the
opening of the Armenian-Turkish border."

7 wagons loaded with gold ore derail in Armenia

Source: PanARMENIAN.Net
Date: 17.03.2009 10:42 GMT+04:00

7 wagons loaded with gold ore derail in Armenia

PanARMENIAN.Net/ 7 wagons loaded with gold ore derailed at the
Hrazdan-Solak sector on the night of March 17.
According to the press office of South Caucasus Railways CJSC, the
traffic has been held up.
The incident was caused by defect of the track. Repair works were
launched and the line will be put into operation within two days