Yerevan police investigate desecration of Gandhi statue

Save

Share

 12:32,

YEREVAN, APRIL 29, ARMENPRESS. Yerevan police are investigating the vandalism which targeted the statue of Mahatma Gandhi in the Armenian capital.

The statue has been damaged in the incident, police told ARMENPRESS. “Materials are now being filed at the police precinct.”

The statue of the leader of India’s independence movement stands in a park at the Halabyan-Margaryan intersection.

Various news outlets published photos showing the statue on fire overnight.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Azeri troops re-deploy near Artsakh village after pulling back

Save

Share

 13:31,

STEPANAKERT, APRIL 28, ARMENPRESS. Azerbaijan again deployed its troops to the direction of the Nor Ghazanchi village in Artsakh, the same position they had earlier pulled back from, according to the mayor of the village Ruslan Arustamyan.

“The Azerbaijani [troops] again moved forward to the positions from where they had pulled back from on April 27. Our government and the [Russian] peacekeepers are taking measures,” he told ARMENPRESS.

The Martakert regional governor Hayk Bakhshiyan also confirmed this report.

However, Artsakh presidential spokesperson Lusine Avanesyan declined to comment.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Azerbaijan pulls back troops after advancing 400 meters near Artsakh village, authorities say

Save

Share

 12:19,

MARTAKERT, APRIL 27, ARMENPRESS. Azerbaijan pulled back its troops near the Nor Ghazanchi village in Martakert region after having advanced its positions for 400 meters, the Martakert regional governor Hayk Bashkhyan told ARMENPRESS.

He confirmed that the Azeri troops had indeed moved forward for 400 meters in the direction of Nor Ghazanchi, but on April 27 they retreated to their starting positions as a result of the Artsakh President Arayik Harutyunyan’s interference and negotiations of the Defense Army and the Russian peacekeepers.

President Harutyunyan’s spokesperson Lusine Avanesyan confirmed that the Azeri troops pulled back as a result of the implemented “relevant work”.

Reporting by Van Novikov

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Australian PM does not use word ”genocide” – Armenian community plans protests

Australian PM does not use word ”genocide” – Armenian community plans protests

Save

Share

 20:54,

YEREVAN, APRIL 23, ARMENPRESS. Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison has once again fallen short of calling the Ottoman Empire’s mass murders of the Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks as genocide, as descendants of the communities prepare to March for Justice under the banner of #SpeakUpScoMo in Sydney and Melbourne on Saturday 24th April 2021, ARMENPRESS wa sinformed from the Armenian National Committee of Australia (ANC-AU).

Prime Minister Morrison released a statement on the occasion marking the 106th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, once again reversing his own desire as a backbench Member of Parliament in 2011, when he said “we should recognise the Armenian Genocide”.

His letter went further than the one that caused great offence to the community in 2019, when he referred to the Armenian Genocide as “horrors that befell the Armenian people”.

This time, Prime Minister Scott Morrison conceded the Armenians suffered “enormous loss”, referring to “the tragedy of dispossession, deportation and death” and he referenced the eyewitness accounts of Australian prisoners of war, which “stirred outpouring of material and practical support from Australia” including “to the Australasian Orphanage in Antilyas, Lebanon”.

However, Prime Minister Morrison’s failure to correctly characterise 1915 as genocides ensures Australia remains behind over 30 nations, including the United States Congress, as President Joe Biden looks set to ensure his Administration joins his parliament in correctly referring to the Armenian Genocide in his widely anticipated statement this weekend.

ANC-AU Executive Director, Haig Kayserian said that what effectively amounts to the continued appeasement of genocide denial as outlined by Prime Minister Morrison’s statement will be the focus of the discontent set to be communicated by the Armenian-Australian, Assyrian-Australian and Greek-Australian communities, who have joined forces under the Joint Justice Initiative brand to lead their communities in protest marches in Sydney and Melbourne on Saturday 24th April 2021 and to continue to lobby for recognition of the genocides.

“While we appreciate Prime Minister’s recognition of Australia’s first major international humanitarian relief effort to aid the victims of 1915, his failure to call a genocide by name is unacceptable to our communities,” said Kayserian.

“The Prime Minister acknowledges there was dispossession, deportation and death suffered by the Armenians, which led to this relief effort, but his failure to call out the Armenian Genocide means these crimes were not committed based on the grounds of race.”

“This defies logic, considering the scholar who coined the term genocide, Professor Raphael Lemkin himself said he was motivated by the crimes committed against the Armenians and the Jews when concluding a term and legal convention was required to stop the cycle of genocide,” Kayserian added.

On , an unprecedented number of Australian politicians offered messages supporting Federal recognition of the Armenian, Assyrian and Greek Genocides for the 106th Anniversary Commemoration, which was live streamed online.

Minister Paul Fletcher continued his steadfast support calling for national recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Government in which he serves, Premier Gladys Berejiklian similarly declared she was hopeful Australia will be the next country to join the side of truth and justice on this issue, as did federal parliamentarians Adam Bandt – Leader of The Australian Greens, Member for Berowra Julian Leeser, Member for Goldstein Tim Wilson, Member for Hunter Joel Fitzgibbon, Senator Andrew Bragg, Senator Eric Abetz, Senator Kristina Keneally,  Member for Mackellar Jason Falinski MP, Member for Reid Fiona Martin, Member for Macarthur Mike Freelander, Member for Macnamara Josh Burns, Member for Bennelong John Alexander, Member for North Sydney Trent Zimmerman and Member for Adelaide Steve Georganas.

New South Wales parliamentarians joining the chorus calling for national recognition included the co-convenors of the state’s Armenia-Australia Parliamentary Friendship Group, Member for Davidson Jonathan O’Dea and Walt Secord, Member for Ryde Victor Dominello, Member for Prospect Hugh McDermott, and Member for Lismore Janelle Saffin.

In addition to these political messages of support, Prime Minister Scott Morrison has received letters calling for his accurate recognition of the Armenian, Assyrian and Greek Genocides from Mr. Trent Zimmerman MP and Hon. Joel Fitzgibbon MP – as co-convenors of the Armenia-Australia Inter-Parliamentary Union, Senator Janet Rice – as the Foreign Affairs Spokesperson of The Australian Greens, Hon. Jonathan O’Dea MP and Hon. Walt Secord MLC – as co-convenors of the New South Wales Armenia-Australia Parliamentary Friendship Group, the New South Wales Young Liberals, the New South Wales Ecumenical Council representing 16 churches, Christian Charity Barnabas Fund Australia, Kurdish Lobby Australia, as well as from numerous prominent academics.

On 20th April, the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies passed a motion joining their peak Executive Council of Australian Jewry reiterating their call on the Australian Government and all governments to recognise the Armenian Genocide at a plenum held in Sydney titled “Learning from the Holocaust: Why countries should recognise the Armenian, Assyrian and Greek genocides”.
“The evidence is in. Australia has already spoken on the issue of recognition of the Armenian, Assyrian and Greek Genocides. We are just waiting for our Prime Minister and his Government to join us,” said Kayserian.

Androulakis: Azerbaijani President Insults The Memory Of Dead Armenian Soldiers

Greek City Times
April 13 2021
by Paul Antonopoulos

A “park” which display “trophy” helmets and dummies of Armenian soldiers who were martyred in last years war in Nagorno-Karabakh, was inaugurated on Monday by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and condemned by MEP Nikos Androulakis.

In a post on social media, Member of the European Parliament for the Movement for Change, Nikos Androulakis, denounced the country’s president and stressed that he “insults the memory of the Armenian soldiers” by establishing a park of “barbarism.”

“International organisations cannot remain silent to these medieval practices that shame humanity,” he said.

According to local media, the “park” in the Azerbaijani capital of Baku will receive its first visitors on April 14.

Armenia’s PM faced mass protests. Why is he still leading polls?

Al-Jazeera, Qatar
April 16 2021

While blamed for losing the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Pashinyan has mended ties with Putin and could regain trust.

Few political leaders are as embattled as Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

Many in the South Caucasus nation blame him for the humiliating defeat in last year’s war with neighbouring Azerbaijan over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Thousands of protesters, top generals and political opponents urged him to resign, while thousands of grieving families of refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh flooded Armenia.

The grey-bearded 44-year-old has said he would step down later in April.

In a March 18 Facebook post, after much pressure to do so, Pashinyan announced a snap parliamentary vote in June as the “best way out” of the crisis.

But the resignation and vote are far from heralding Pashinyan’s political demise.

The My Step coalition he heads looks likely to win the election – and vote him in as prime minister again, according to a Gallup International Association poll held in late March.

Almost a third of voters are ready to cast their ballots for My Step, which now holds 75 percent of seats in Armenia’s unicameral parliament.

Meanwhile, Pashinyan’s main opponent, Robert Kocharyan, a former separatist leader who served as Armenia’s president in 1998 – 2008, trails far behind with less than six percent.

During the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, as Armenia suffered losses, Pashinyan moved away from his pro-Western sympathies to accept Russian President Vladimir Putin as Armenia’s supreme international backer – and kingmaker.

On April 7, his almost four-hour meeting with Putin looked like a successful campaign stop – and a kowtow. He attentively listened to Putin, who assumed a mentor’s tone while talking to him in a Kremlin tea-room.

“We effectively discussed all the matters,” Pashinyan told a Russian broadcaster after the meeting. “Yes, I am very satisfied.”

Pashinyan negotiated the supply of Russian-made anti-coronavirus vaccines, discussed the construction of a nuclear power station that will be crucial for resource-poor Armenia, and secured Moscow’s help in the release of up to 200 Armenian prisoners of war held in Azerbaijan.

“The Kremlin fully controls the situation in Armenia, and premiere Pashinyan is no longer a threat to Moscow the way he was in the first years of his prime-ministerial work,” Emil Mustafayev, an analyst based in the Azerbaijani capital, Baku, told Al Jazeera.

In an op-ed published in the Kommersant daily on April 8, Moscow-based analyst Sergey Strokan wrote: “The former leader of Armenia’s ‘colour revolution’ became an example of how a bad boy transformed into a politician who finally understood who is who and how much things are.”

“Colour revolutions” are what the Kremlin hates and tries to suppress.

The term dates back to the 2003 Rose Revolution in Georgia and the 2005 Orange Revolution in Ukraine.

Both deposed pro-Russian leaders in favour of pro-Western ones, and the Kremlin still insists the West financed them.

To prevent a possible “colour revolution” in Russia, Putin toughened election laws, stifled the opposition and launched youth movements that were trained how to disperse protest rallies.

To stave off such uprisings in ex-Soviet republics, Moscow boosted its soft power and provided loans and arms to prop up Kremlin-friendly leaders such as Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko.

But Pashinyan landed in the prime minister’s seat after leading an exemplary “colour revolution”.

The series of street protests in 2018 attracted up to 100,000 people in the nation of 3.5 million, and deposed a powerful clique of mainly pro-Russian officials.

After Pashinyan came to power in 2018, many believed he would lead Armenia westward.

“There were many discussions among experts that the new democratic government of Armenia, with many overtly anti-Russian officials in its ranks, will gradually decrease Armenia’s dependence on Russia,” Yerevan-based analyst Benyamin Poghosyan wrote in an op-ed published by the KarabakhSpace.eu news website on April 12.

But “now, Armenia is more dependent on Russia than ever,” he concluded.

To some, this reality feels especially bitter given that despite a defence pact with Yerevan and a military base on Armenian soil, Moscow opted to sit out the recent war with Azerbaijan.

The conflict killed thousands on both sides, and according to a Russia-brokered truce, a huge chunk of Nagorno-Karabakh went back to Azerbaijan.

Pashinyan did not arrive in Moscow empty-handed.

In an apparent attempt to appease Putin, he let his worst political enemy off the hook.

One day before his departure to Moscow, Armenia’s Constitutional Court ruled to drop “coup” charges against Kocharyan – almost 13 years after he ordered to use violence against a street rally organised by Pashinyan, who was then a popular publicist.

Eight protesters and two police officers were killed during the 2008 crackdown, and Pashinyan was later sentenced to seven years in jail. He was amnestied after serving one year.

After the charges were dropped, Kocharyan immediately started forming an opposition coalition to run in the June 20 vote.

The coalition does not have a name yet, and its ratings are low now, but if Kocharyan manages to win or secure a sizeable fraction in parliament, the result will not be bad for the Kremlin either.

“With him, the team he formed while serving as Armenia’s president for 10 years, will return,” Yerevan-based political analyst Boris Navasardian told Al Jazeera.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA
 

Protection of women’s rights among government’s priorities – Deputy PM Avinyan addresses message

Save

Share

 10:49, 7 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 7, ARMENPRESS. Deputy Prime Minister of Armenia Tigran Avinyan has addressed a message on the Motherhood and Beauty Day, his Office told Armenpress.

The message reads:

“April 7 is one of the national holidays of the Armenian calendar which has highlighted the role of a woman in the Armenian public for centuries. This supposes a high responsibility while conducting the policy of ensuring women’s complete and inclusive participation to the public life, protecting and promoting their rights.

As Chairman of the Council on Women Affairs in Armenia, I reaffirm that the protection of women’s rights and the elimination of discrimination against women and girls are among the fundamental priorities of the Armenian government. With this commitment I congratulate mothers, women and girls on the Motherhood and Beauty Day, wishing good health and smile”.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Distraught families of missing troops and PoWs attempt to breach into Defense Ministry headquarters

Save

Share

 14:07, 9 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 9, ARMENPRESS. Parents of the servicemen who are missing in action in the 2020 Karabakh war and those who are still held captive by Azerbaijan are protesting outside the Defense Ministry headquarters in Yerevan. The families demand a meeting with Defense Minister Vagharshak Harutyunyan and Chief of General Staff Lt. General Artak Davtyan.

Heavy police presence is in the area.

The demonstrators attempted to break into the building by breaching the front gate at the main entrance. Police officers removed the protesters and cordoned off the building.

National police chief Vahe Ghazaryan personally arrived to the scene to de-escalate the situation.

This latest demonstration began in the evening of April 8, when an aircraft which was supposed to return PoWs from Azerbaijan landed without them in Yerevan in what the government described as a “delay” of the repatriation related to Azerbaijan’s failure to implement the terms of the armistice.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

On The Legal Political Status Of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) – Greek City Times

GREEK CITY TIMES
April 7 2021
by Guest Contributor
0

Advertisment.

Over the past decades, discussions on the recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh’s (Artsakh’s) sovereign status have been taking place.

As the main framework of the talks and political negotiations, the aspects of Artsakh’s self-determination and Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity have been seen as two contradicting ones.

The invasion of Artsakh by Azerbaijan on September 27 in 2020 further escalated and complicated the conflict, despite the unilateral statements by the political leadership of Azerbaijan claiming the conflict is resolved.

Azerbaijani soldier in occupied Artsakh.

The de facto partial occupation of the Republic of Artsakh’s territories, as an outcome of the Second Artsakh War in 2020, does not abolish the Republic’s legal-political status.

The status of Nagorno-Karabakh, as argued, should be viewed from the perspectives of a conceptually new approach.

Information given below will be of significant help for larger audiences to understand Nagorno-Karabakh’s (Artsakh’s) legal-political status.

It guides for the formation of an understanding about:

  • The way Artsakh’s political status and rights are perceived in the region (including in Azerbaijan) and the rest of the world, and
  • The legal basis and the legality of proceedings that are connected to the actions that Artsakh may undertake in the future.

The following consecutive ten points help formulate the foundation and justification of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh):

  • As of 1990, both Nagorno-Karabakh (then-Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast or NKAO) and Azerbaijan (the rest of then-Soviet Azerbaijan) were part of one sovereign entity – the Soviet Union (USSR). It is essential to determine the extent to which the development of the Nagorno-Karabakh’s status complied with the acting legislation.
  • On April 03, 1990, the USSR adopted a law (N 1409-I titled “On the Procedure for Resolving Issues Related to the Exit of a Union Republic from the USSR” or (original in Russian) Закон СССР N 1409-I «О ПОРЯДКЕ РЕШЕНИЯ ВОПРОСОВ, СВЯЗАННЫХ С ВЫХОДОМ СОЮЗНОЙ РЕСПУБЛИКИ ИЗ СССР») regulating the conditions for the secession of union republics and autonomous units (including autonomous oblasts/provinces) from the USSR. This right was extended even to non-autonomous regions with ethnic groups of condensed inhabitation.
  • According to Article 3 of the above-mentioned Law, each autonomous unit included in a Soviet republic’s territory (for example, NKAO in Soviet Azerbaijan) was provided with an independent right to hold a referendum on secession from the USSR. This right prescribed a referendum as the only legal path to achieve sovereignty. To put it simply, each autonomous unit (NKAO, for instance) had an independent right to withdraw from the USSR following the referendum results.
  • On December 10, 1991, in full compliance with the acting legislation, a referendum was held in Nagorno-Karabakh (then-NKAO), following which the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (present: Republic of Artsakh) was proclaimed.
  • According to Article 6 of the Law mentioned above, the referendum results were to be reviewed by the Supreme Council (the parliament) of Soviet Azerbaijan, together with Nagorno-Karabakh’s authorities. However, from the day the referendum’s results became public until the very moment the USSR stopped existing (00:00 on December 26, 1991), no actions to consider the results of Nagorno-Karabakh’s referendum was initiated by Azerbaijan. The acting legislation in the USSR prescribed no other settlement of this issue. Thus, following the USSR’s dissolution, two sovereign nation-states were formed on Soviet Azerbaijan’s territory: the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (present: Republic of Artsakh) and the Republic of Azerbaijan.

Additionally, on October 18, 1991, Azerbaijan declared its sovereignty through the Constitutional Act of the State Independence, which stated that the (modern) Republic of Azerbaijan was the legal successor of the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan (1918-1920).

A noteworthy detail was that the latter never had Nagorno-Karabakh included as a part of its territory.

Moreover, the Act classified the Soviet rule as “annexation”.

Such legal definition prescribes cancellation of all legal actions initiated by the occupying/annexing power, in particular, the inclusion of Nagorno-Karabakh in Soviet Azerbaijan in the early-1920s.

Last but not least, Azerbaijan held a referendum on secession from the USSR (to repeat: the only legal path to exercise sovereignty from the Union) only THREE DAYS AFTER the USSR’s end: on December 29, 1991.

This fact clarifies that before the USSR stopped existing as a sovereign legal-political entity (00:00 on December 26, 1991), Azerbaijan continued to remain a republic within the USSR and, as of then, had failed to fulfil its obligations stipulated by law.

  • After gaining de jure independence (note: up to that moment, no former territorial unit of the USSR could have an independent army), Azerbaijan unleashed an undeclared war against Nagorno-Karabakh. The latter defended itself, preserved most of its territory (within the NKAO borders), and liberated the adjacent areas. Territories acquired during the war through the counter-offensive cannot be considered “illegally occupied” but become a subject of future peace treaty negotiations, similar to, for instance, the modern French region of Alsace-Lorraine, acquired from Imperial Germany after WWI, or Russia’s Kaliningrad Oblast/Province, acquired from Nazi Germany after WWII.
  • As of 1994, when the representative of Nagorno-Karabakh, along with representatives of Armenia and Azerbaijan, put his signature on the cease-fire agreement (cease-fire in force from May 12, 1994), the sovereign status of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) expanded over the former NKAO and the newly-liberated territories, before the status of the latter was to be determined exclusively through peaceful negotiations. Here it is worth referring to the four 1993 UN resolutions (April 30, July 29, October 14, and November 12), which Azerbaijan points to as its justification for considering Nagorno-Karabakh as its territory. All the four resolutions were issued in 1993, when Karabakh’s defence forces, through the counter-offensive, were liberating the security belt – the regions surrounding the former NKAO. In all the cases, the crucial pre-condition set by the resolutions was calling Azerbaijan for “cessation of hostilities” first, which Azerbaijan never did (until the mediated cease-fire in May 1994). By ignoring this fact and taking other conditions out of context is nothing but manipulating the international public opinion.
  • Within its borders, as mentioned under point 7), Nagorno-Karabakh reserves a right to exercise its sovereign political decisions. Based on the information presented above, Nagorno-Karabakh’s current status lies higher than the nations’ universal right for self-determination. It extends the territory of the Republic beyond the borders of the former NKAO by fixing it within the de-facto borders (cease-fire demarcation line) as of May 12, 1994. Thus, for Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh), the case is of EXERCISING ITS OWN RIGHT FOR SELF-DETERMINATION AND PROTECTING ITS TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY.
  • Since 1992 and until September 27, 2020, sovereign (Republic of) Azerbaijan, along with all other parties involved in the conflict (as its sides and mediators: specifically, Armenia, as a guarantor of Artsakh’s security, the OSCE Minsk Group and its co-chair states of Russia, United States, and France, as mandated to the OSCE by the United Nations) had repeatedly and consistently insisted on the unacceptability of a military solution to the conflict and that a peaceful resolution was the only acceptable solution. With this principle stated consistently for nearly three decades, after each negotiation session, any side initiating a military campaign to resolve the conflict becomes legally responsible for breaking the format of the conflict resolution process (as mandated to the OCSE by the UN). By committing the act of aggression on Artsakh on September 27, 2020, Azerbaijan became legally responsible for breaking the peaceful resolution path.
  • On November 26, 2020, the Senate of the French Republic issued a resolution calling “on the French authorities to take all possible measures to ensure the restoration of the borders established in 1994, which were enshrined in the termless trilateral ceasefire agreement signed by the Republic of Artsakh, Armenia and Azerbaijan”. This statement emphasises that Artsakh’s legally-established borders, before peace treaty negotiations take place, are those de facto existing by the time of the ceasefire (as of May 12, 1994).

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has not been resolved despite Azerbaijan’s current rhetoric, which is more a propaganda language aimed at presenting and promoting itself as the only party of the conflict committed to long term peace. Coherent peace can be established only by exercising the rights of the people who inhabit Artsakh. Consistent efforts by the official diplomacy of the Republic of Armenia and Republic of Artsakh, by Armenian diaspora institutions, as well as public diplomacy and the use of ‘soft power’, assume a long process aiming to achieve recognition of Artsakh’s already-exercised sovereignty (from 1991), i.e., to protect its people’s right for self-determination AND the Republic’s territorial integrity.


Born in the Armenian capital of Yerevan, Vahagn Vardanyan currently lives in Hong Kong.

With a doctorate in Political Geography from the National University of Singapore, his research interests, among others, include national identity, nation/place branding, and diaspora-homeland relations.

(This is a modified and extended version of an article first published by on October 09, 2020.)
(This is a modified and extended version of an article first published by on October 09, 2020.)

Pashinyan says situation at military’s general staff is resolved

Save

Share

 17:35, 6 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 6, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said that the situation around the General Staff of the Armenian military is resolved.

“The situation concerning the general staff of the armed forces is resolved and the army, together with the government, will fully continue the steps in the direction of ensuring and strengthening the country’s security,” Pashinyan told RIA Novosti in an interview.

Earlier on April 2, the Chief of Staff of the Armenian military Lt. General Artak Davtyan had also that the situation is resolved.  

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan