TURKISH EU MINISTER ON THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE CONTROVERSY: ‘WE ARE VERY SENSITIVE ABOUT THIS ISSUE’
Spiegel Online
,1518,683701,00.html
March 16 2010
Germany
In a SPIEGEL interview, Ankara’s Minister for European Affairs
Egemen Bagis discusses Turkey’s journey to the West and his country’s
dispute with the United States over a resolution on the genocide of
the Armenians recently passed by Congress.
SPIEGEL: Mr. Bagis, why does Turkey still need a minister for European
Union affairs? Isn’t Europe a dead issue in your country?
Bagis: Absolutely not. My government is investing more energy in the
reform process than any other government. In 2013 we will be ready
for accession.
SPIEGEL: But do Turks share your enthusiam? Three out of four
Turks believe that the EU wants to divide your country and spread
Christianity.
Bagis: I have other figures: If Turkey held a referendum today on
accession, 60 percent would vote for it. On the other hand, only 40
percent of Turks believe that accession will definitely take place. In
Europe it is the other way round: Forty percent want to take Turkey
in, but 60 percent believe the country will join the EU one day.
SPIEGEL: In other words: There is skepticism on both sides.
Bagis: Let’s put it this way: Some countries like Malta apply
for membership and are in the next day. Others need a little more
time. I have no problem with the fact that some Europeans say they
want negotiations with an open-ended outcome. Today everything has
an open-ended outcome, even Catholic marriages.
SPIEGEL: Turkey has been seeking EU membership since 1959. Is it not
humiliating to be held at bay for so long?
Bagis: No, because we also made mistakes. There have been three
military coups since 1959, and many Turkish government’s didn’t have
a clear vision or idea of Europe. It was the Justice and Development
Party (AKP) government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan that
first made the necessary constitutional amendments between 2002 and
2004 so that we could finally start accession negotiations.
SPIEGEL: Only 17 percent of Germans support Turkish membership in
the EU.
Bagis: Believe me, one day Europeans will have to appeal to the
Turkish public to support EU membership. Europe has many problems.
Tell me, for example, how the EU plans to solve its energy crisis
without Turkish help? A large part of the future energy resources
Europe needs will flow through Turkey. And tell me how you are going
to solve your economic and demographic problems? The average age in
Europe is 40, while in Turkey it is 28. Where are you going to get
your work force from? Who is supposed to pay your pensions?
SPIEGEL: As long as declared opponents of Turkish accession like
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and France President Nicolas Sarkozy
are in office, you won’t get very far with such arguments.
Bagis: I am very thankful that German Foreign Minister Guido
Westerwelle has publicly stated that he wants accession talks to
continue. With regards to President Sarkozy: He used this horrible,
insulting phrase, "privileged partnership" …
SPIEGEL: … a term that was actually coined by Germany’s conservative
Christian Democratic Union party.
Bagis: But Sarkozy repeated it often enough. My government has only
one answer: We will only accept full membership — nothing more,
nothing less. We want the same chances as every candidate country.
SPIEGEL: Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey, said: "The Turks have
only ever gone in one direction — towards the West."
Bagis: And that is still true. But at the same time, we are also a
bridge and have four strong pillars, one in each direction …
SPIEGEL: … of which you recently pulled out two by recalling your
ambassadors to the United States and Sweden. The move was triggered
by the decision of a Congressional committee to pass a resolution
recognizing the death of more than a million Armenians in 1915-16 as
genocide. A similar resolution was passed by Sweden’s parliament.
Bagis: With this decision, Sweden has become slave to a thesis that,
unfortunately, is based on falsehoods. The voting in the US on the
so-called genocide was a success for Turkey. The Congressman from
California, who got support from the Armenian lobby, made a fool out
of himself. He tried to scratch the back of every Representative in
the corridors of Congress in order to get their vote. But then he
only won by a single vote.
SPIEGEL: Still, a Congressional committee approved the resolution.
Bagis: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton later declared that the
resolution will not be passed by the entire House of Representatives.
As you know, the French parliament passed a similar law on the
so-called Armenian genocide in 2006. Afterwards there was a ban on
French airforce flights over Turkey. We are very sensitive about
this issue.
SPIEGEL: What options do you have if the Americans do, in the end,
recognize the genocide officially? Would you want to close the Incirlik
airbase? Leave NATO?
Bagis: I will leave that up to your readers’ imagination. But allow
me to remind you of one thing: Seventy percent of the logistical
support for the Iraq deployment comes through Incirlik.
SPIEGEL: Why is it so difficult for Turkey to recognize the genocide
of the Armenians?
Bagis: It is up to the historians, not politicians, to judge what
happened in the past. Politicians look into the future. We have offered
to create a joint commission of historians together with the Republic
of Armenia — so far without success. Besides, you should know that
the Ottoman Empire was an ally of the German Reich. Nothing that
happened back then happened without consultations with the Germans.
SPIEGEL: If you dont accept the word "genocide," then how can you
have a "Genocide Museum" in the city of Igdir in eastern Turkey,
dedicated to the Turks who died in 1915?
Bagis: That’s very easy: Every action leads to a reaction. But I
don’t want to rule out the possibility that, someday, this museum
could be transformed into a "Museum of Coexistance" or a "Museum of
Mutual Pain." I do not want to deny that the Armenians went through
very difficult times …
SPIEGEL: You call it "difficult times"? We are taking about 1.5
million Armenians who perished between 1915 and 1917.
Bagis: According to American historian Justin McCarthy, 600,000
Armenians died at the time — and at the same time, 2 million Kurds
and Turks. There was a civil war in Turkey, right in the middle of
World War I.
SPIEGEL: The interior minister at that time, Talat Pascha, told the
then US ambassador, Henry Morgenthau, that the "physical extermination"
of the Amernians was a necessary goal of the war.
Bagis: According to McCarthy, this quote isn’t entirely accurate. But
I am not a historian. I wasn’t there, you weren’t there. Why don’t
we leave this question to a mutual commission of historians comprised
of Armenians and Turks?
SPIEGEL: There was a time when Turkey seemed further along the road
toward confronting its past. In 1919, the three men mainly responsible
for the Armenian genocide — Talat Pasha, Enver Pasha and Cemal Pasha
— were all sentenced to death in absentia. Ataturk wanted nothing to
do with them. Nevertheless, there are still three large, magnificent
tombstones for these men in Istanbul.
Bagis: It is traditional in our culture to commemorate the dead. Like
all of us, these men surely did some good and some bad things in
their lives and for their country.
SPIEGEL: Is Turkey worried the Armenians will demand reparations?
Bagis: You know, there are an estimated 100,000 illegal Armenian
immigrants in our country, who work here providing care for the elderly
and children. For me, this shows that there is no hate between our
people. On the contrary: We are attempting to achieve rapprochement,
there is a peace process between our countries …
SPIEGEL: … which is stagnating at the moment.
Bagis: That is not our fault. We have attempted to bridge our
differences; we want to open all archives. But when you see that the
other side is blocking all your attempts, it makes you skeptical.
SPIEGEL: This issue represents one of the few on which the AKP
government, the military and the secular elite are all on the same
page. Doesn’t that bother you?
Bagis: No. My government focuses on solving problems. We want good
neighborly relations, also with Armenia.
SPIEGEL: Turkey’s new foreign policy earned considerable praise, but
the country’s domestic policies have been enigmatic for some people
in the West. Isn’t your government overplaying its hand in its power
struggle with the army? You are no longer arresting only potential
putschists, but also critics of the government.
Bagis: The investigations in the so-called Ergenekon case, where
men are suspected of having planned a putsch against the government,
are an issue for the judiciary. In the latest progress report, the
European Union assesses the investigation as an opportunity for Turkey
to further democratize itself.
SPIEGEL: Others see signs of continuing Islamization. Restaurants are
losing their alcohol licenses, young people are being harassed for
holding hands in public and Family Minister Aliye Kavaf has described
homosexuality as a "disease."
Bagis: I do not agree with her, I do not consider homosexuality to
be a disease. But I am neither a historian nor a doctor. Besides,
I really don’t think that Turkey has become more conservative. It
just so happens that the conservatives are a lot more visible today
than they were previously.
Interview conducted by Bernhard Zand and Daniel Steinvorth
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0