Alliances Shift As Turks Weigh A Political Turn

ALLIANCES SHIFT AS TURKS WEIGH A POLITICAL TURN
Sabrina Tavernise

Tuscaloosa News , AL
July 20 2007

ISTANBUL, July 19 – For 84 years, modern Turkey has been defined by
a holy trinity – the army, the republic and its founder, Mustafa
Kemal Ataturk. Each was linked inextricably to the others and all
were beyond reproach.

But a deep transformation is under way in this nation of 73 million,
and elections this Sunday may prove a watershed: liberal Turks,
once supporters of the ruling secular elite and its main backer,
the military, are turning their backs on them and pledging votes to
religious politicians as well as a new array of independents.

They say that the rigid rules of the last century, which prohibit
women from wearing Muslim head scarves in public buildings and forbid
ethnic minorities to express their identities, need to be left behind.

"This election is a power struggle between those who want change and
those who don’t," said Zafer Uskul, a prominent constitutional lawyer
and human rights advocate who is a candidate from Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan’s Islamic-inspired party. "Religion is just an excuse."

He and others say the rules served a purpose when Turkey was forging
a national identity out of the remains of the Ottoman Empire. But
now Turkey has outgrown them.

"In 50 years, people will write that this was the time Turkey started
to come to terms with its own people," said Suat Kiniklioglu, a foreign
policy expert who is one of about 20 liberal Turks who recently joined
Mr. Erdogan’s party as part of its effort to appeal more broadly to
secular Turkish society.

The real threat to Turkish democracy, he and others argue, comes not
from Islamic fundamentalism, as the military and the secular parties
it backs contend, but from political meddling by the military.

Commanders have deposed elected governments four times in Turkey’s
history, and in April the military challenged the government in a
written statement, precipitating elections.

Now, as the elections approach, pitting the nation’s secular elite
against a group of religious politicians who draw their support
from the lower and middle classes, educated liberals may just tip
the balance.

The current shift has its roots in the dual nature of Turkish
democracy. From its beginnings in the 1940s, a powerful chain of
bureaucrats, judges and army generals from the secular upper classes
has controlled the most important Turkish affairs, while the elected
government, currently the Justice and Development Party of Mr.

Erdogan, manages more mundane aspects, much like a municipality.

But Turkish society has significantly changed in recent decades,
with religious Turks gaining wealth and status and moving into public
view. Women in head scarves – precisely those whom early Turkish
legislation singled out – are in shopping malls, on motor scooters
and behind the wheels of cars, and rules against them seem woefully
outdated.

Ilhan Dogus, a member of the Young Civilians, an association of young
people who oppose the military’s role in politics, said mischievously
that educated women in head scarves were more likely than their
less religious counterparts to know that Marx refers to a German
philosopher, not the British department store, Marks and Spencer.

"This narrow shirt of secularism has become a little too tight and
choking for Turkish society," said Volkan Aytar of the Turkish Economic
and Social Studies Foundation, a prominent policy research group.

He is referring to Kemalism, the fiercely secular ideology that
sought to extinguish religious networks and ultimately religion itself
from society.

The state elite "wanted society to fit their theory," said Recep
Senturk, a research fellow at the Center for Islamic Studies in
Istanbul. "If religion doesn’t disappear, we’ll make it disappear
because our theory says so."

Liberals like Mr. Uskul are pioneers in joining political forces with
Mr. Erdogan’s party, known by its Turkish initials, AK, and considered
by many secular Turks to be too Islamic.

In Tarsus, an upper-middle-class town in southern Turkey that has
supported secular parties, Mr. Uskul, 63, was talking to lawyers last
week, asking for their votes.

"Some of you might be asking, ‘What is he doing in the AK Party?’ "
he said at the Tarsus Bar Association, peering earnestly through
rimless glasses. "There was no other party to do what I wanted to
do in Parliament. The people who should be defending democracy are
holding onto military coups."

A woman in a black T-shirt shot back: "I wonder whether you still
have worries about AK as a threat to secularism?"

He replied: "My wife has no concerns. Nor does my daughter, and you
shouldn’t either."

The portion of Turkish society hanging onto the old order is shrinking,
Mr. Aytar asserts, so when more than a million Turks gathered this
spring to protest what they said was creeping Islamism, bizarre
combinations were on display. People wore masks of Ataturk, who died
more than 60 years ago. The music that played was from 1930s. "They
have calcified," said Baskin Oran, an opinionated professor running
as an independent candidate in Istanbul.

Mr. Oran estimates that parties representing that order will get
about a quarter of the vote, largely thanks to a campaign of fear
that plays on secularism. An ad last week in Cumhuriyet, a staunchly
pro-state daily, showed a black ballot box and a woman’s eyes behind
the rectangular cut-out, evoking a facial veil. "Are you aware of
the danger?" it said. Before the ill-fated presidential election
this spring, a television ad flashed the years 1881 and 2007 on a
black screen – the year of Ataturk’s birth and the year his secular
reforms died.

The campaign was a final straw for some Turkish liberals, who say that
it distracts from Turkey’s real problems: unemployment, insufficient
social security benefits, poor relations with Kurds and Armenians
and the efforts to gain membership in the European Union.

A troubling offshoot is nationalists, who play on fears by warning that
the European Union wants to tear Turkey apart. The main nationalist
party appears set to win enough votes to make it into the Parliament,
supported by Turks who are overwhelmed by the sharp changes in the
country over the past five years.

When a liberal newspaper asked for a response to the ads, Ferhat
Tumer, a 32-year-old advertising designer, and his colleagues at the
ad agency Cocuklar began to brainstorm.

The result was a one-minute cartoon in the style of a late-night
American television ad that only two Turkish television channels
were willing to broadcast but that became a cult favorite overnight
on the Internet.

"Is thinking a crime? Speech not allowed? Is your society excluding
you, or forcing you to take sides?" the salesman-style voice-over asks
in staccato Turkish. "Move away from fragile systems that are easily
toppled. Original Democracy, adhered to by millions around the world,
is now available in Turkey!"

The short cartoon would probably not have been possible five years
ago, though Cocuklar, which means "Kids" in Turkish, had first
proposed a much more confrontational version that was a direct dig
at the military. The newspaper that solicited the cartoon, Radikal,
though brave, was not foolhardy.

"We believe there is a hidden group of people in Turkey who are
bored by this talk," said Mr. Tumer, fiddling with a green yoyo while
sitting at a glass table. "We know you’re not afraid of this scarf.

When she takes it off, she still has the same ideas."

"This paranoia, this tension, for the young generation, it’s just
old-fashioned," he said.

Inherent in Turkey’s progress was a strange contradiction. The state
excluded religion from public life and looked down on religious,
traditional Turks as backward, yet when they became more integrated
in public life, condemned them as enemies of the state.

"Secular urban forces headed by the army look at these people as if
they were aliens from outer space," said Dogu Ergil, a sociology
professor at Ankara University. "But they are the products of the
very regime that left them out."

As Turkey moves ahead, it will have to grapple with where Islam fits
in the building of an equitable society. Almost all Turks, after all,
are practicing Muslims. But the argument, liberals contend, will not
be over whether Islam should be part of the government, but instead
over what type of secularism fits best.

Mr. Uskul argues that Turkey’s bid for European Union membership,
pushed by Mr. Erdogan’s party, has set it on a course of democracy
that virtually guarantees secularism.

"The AK Party is Turkey’s reality," he said, chewing a cracker at a
kebab restaurant. "Turks have to accept it."

"But it should proceed by showing it’s not a threat to Turkey,"
he added. "I am an example of its willingness to reform."

Mottaki Urges Promotion Of Tehran-Yerevan Economic Cooperation

MOTTAKI URGES PROMOTION OF TEHRAN-YEREVAN ECONOMIC COOPERATION

Islamic Republic News Agency, Iran
July 20 2007

Iran’s visiting Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said here on
Friday there are new horizons for growing economic relations and
cooperation between Iran and Armenia.

Mottaki, who is here to attend the Seventh Tehran-Yerevan Joint
Economic Cooperation Commission session as head of the Iranian side,
made the remark in a meeting with his Armenian counterpart Wartan
Oskanian.

He said Tehran-Yerevan ties have attained remarkable growth over
recent years.

Oskanian for his part termed the seventh Commission session as a move
for stronger bilateral ties.

Iran-Armenia transactions exceeds dlrs 200 million presently.

Voters In Rebel Karabakh Elect New President

VOTERS IN REBEL KARABAKH ELECT NEW PRESIDENT
by Michael Mainville

Agence France Presse — English
July 19, 2007 Thursday 7:33 PM GMT
Stepanakert, Azerbaijan

Voters went to the polls Thursday in Azerbaijan’s breakaway region
of Nagorny Karabakh to elect a new president for this isolated,
ethnic Armenian-controlled mountain enclave.

Early results showed Bako Sahakian, a former head of the state security
service, storming to victory.

With 30 percent of the votes counted, Sahakian was well ahead with
87.1 percent of the vote, the central elections commission said.

His nearest rival, deputy foreign minister Masis Maylian, placed a
distant second with 11.2 percent of the vote.

Officials said they hoped the vote would shore up the region’s
democratic credentials, boosting its efforts to become an
internationally recognized country after 15 years of self-declared
independence.

No country in the world recognises the independence of Karabakh,
and the international community has ignored the vote.

Azerbaijan, which has vowed to regain control of the region, has
already denounced the election as having "no legal effect whatsoever."

Current president Arkady Ghukasian was ineligble to run after two
terms as president.

Many voters said they preferred Sahakian because of his record in
the security services.

"I like Masis very much, but now is not the time for intellectuals,"
said Armen Martirosian, 41, after voting for Sahakian. "As long as
the war is not over we need a strong person in charge."

Voter turnout had reached 76.25 percent before polls closed at 8:00
pm local time (1500 GMT), the elections commission announced. At least
25 percent of voters had to participate for the election to be valid.

Voting at a school in Stepanakert, Sahakian said he hoped the election
would convince the international community that Karabakh can be a
functioning democratic state.

"We are holding this election to build a civil society and prove to
the world that we want to be a democratic country," he said.

But Maylian, who has accused the authorities of campaigning against
him, said his office had filed 14 complaints with the elections
commission over alleged irregularities.

He rejected claims that he was hurting Karabakh’s chances of winning
international recognition by raising questions about the election’s
democratic credentials.

"If we love our country and we want the civilized world to recognize
us, we must be democratic," he said.

Backed by their ethnic brethren in Armenia, separatists seized Karabakh
and seven surrounding regions from Azerbaijan in the early 1990s.

The war was one of the bloodiest of the many conflicts that followed
the collapse of the Soviet Union, claiming 30,000 lives and forcing
nearly one million people on both sides to flee their homes.

Armenia and Azerbaijan remain officially at war over Karabakh and
the dispute is a major source of instability in the strategic South
Caucasus region wedged between Iran, Russia and Turkey.

Heavily armed and supported by Armenia’s widespread diaspora community,
Karabakh’s 150,000 people have remained defiant in the face of
oil-rich Azerbaijan’s promises to regain control of the region,
by force if necessary.

Sporadic clashes continue along Karabakh’s border.

A full-blown conflict could derail Western-backed efforts to build
a corridor of pipelines to carry Azerbaijani and Central Asian oil
and gas through the South Caucasus to Europe.

International mediation to resolve the conflict has repeatedly failed.

The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) condemned the vote
Thursday as a sign of Armenia’s "aggression" against Muslim Azerbaijan.

"The so-called ‘elections’ gravely violate relevant norms and
principles of international law… This act and its results therefore
have no legal effect," secretary general Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said
in a statement.

The OIC urged an "immediate, complete and unconditional withdrawal of
Armenian occupying forces from the occupied territories of Azerbaijan."

Chess: Petrosian Wins

PETROSIAN WINS

Hindu, India
July 17 2007

NEW DELHI: K. Sasikiran went down to eventual runner-up USA’s
Gata Kamsky 1.5-2.5 in the quarterfinals of the Chess960 Internet
championship during the two-day knockout phase that ended on Sunday.

Armenia’s Tigran Petrosian won the title by beating Kamsky 4-2 in
the final.

Earlier, Petrosian eliminated K. Ratnakaran, the other Indian
challenger, 3-0 in the round of 32 on Saturday.

On Friday, Sasikiran and Ratnakaran scored 7.5 points from the
nine-round qualifiers to be among the 32 players who made the knockout
phase from all over the world.

Ter-Petrosyan’s Return A Public Demand?

TER-PETROSYAN’S RETURN A PUBLIC DEMAND?

A1+
[04:10 pm] 17 July, 2007

"We cannot solve new problems with old stereotypes, we need new
ideas, new formats", considers Hovhannes Hovhannessian, leader of
"Armenian Liberal Progressive Party". He thinks that the public
is waiting for a real alternative, and he sees that alternative in
Ter-Petrosyan. According to Mr Hovhannessian, Ter-Petrosyan has more
chances, than other presidency candidates, since all "fundamental
successes" in the modern history of Armenia has been achieved
when Ter-Petrosyan was the RA president. Among other successes,
Mr Hovhannessian mentioned the achievement of independence,
Nagorno-Karabakh victory, Bagratyan’s economic and land reforms,
which the present authorities could not complete. "The present
authorities could not solve any fundamental problems", pointed
Hovhannes Hovhannessian.

"The Karabakh problem has not been settled, the country is in
complementary regime. We are left out of all regional projects,
relations with Turkey is unsettled, bribe and corruption are scattered
all over the country", mentioned Mr Hovhannessian. And the first
president of the Republic has no right to keep silence and not to
return to the political field when such a chaos preserves in the
state. Mr Hovhannessian is confirmed that there is an urgent need in
Ter-Petrosyan’s return, since the nation prefers the individual who
is more mysterious and the 10-year mysterious silence gives him more
opportunities to be elected.

Hovhannes Hovhannessian noted that the political field in Armenia
was not accomplished and the reason was "before each election the
authorities puzzle the nation until the next elections". A normal
political field cannot be attained by a divided, small and ambitious
field. In Hovhannessian’s opinion, one should not think of preserving
a chair, but of establishing a proper political field for the future
generation.

He also informed that negotiations aimed at uniting political parties
were on the process. But as Mr Hovhannessian noted everything was
still complicated.

Disputes within Mr Hovhannessian’s party are going on.

Eduard Antinyan, secretary of the board of "Armenian Liberal
Progressive Party", accuses Hovhannes Hovhannessian in taking away
the documents and demands new plans for the party. Mr Hovhannessian
refused to touch upon the party’s problems today promising to solve
the problem in the coming session in September.

Karabakhi President Leaves For Armenia To Participate In Reburial Of

KARABAKHI PRESIDENT LEAVES FOR ARMENIA TO PARTICIPATE IN REBURIAL OF ALEK AND MARY MANUKYAN

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
July 16 2007

STEPANAKERT. July 16. /ARKA/. NKR President Arkady Ghukasyan will
participate in the ceremony of reburial of Alek Manukyan, national
hero of the Republic of Armenia, life president of the Armenian Public
Charitable Union, national benefactor of the Holy Echmiadzin, Center
of the Armenian Church, and his wife Mary Manukyan in Armenia.

The ashes of Alek and Mary Manukyan were delivered to Armenia from
Detroit (USA) on July 13. The burial ceremony will take place on July
17 in the Holy Echmiadzin in front of the Museum-Treasury, built on
their funds.

The ceremony participants will be the Leader of the Armenian Church
Garegin II, Armenian President Robert Kocharian, high-rank officials,
members of the Manukyans’ family, and the congregation.

The sarcophagi with the Manukyan’s ashes are placed in the Church of
Saint Gayane, where the faithful people can pray and pay tribute to
them.

Global Gold Corporation Estimated Humor Sense Of Azeri Journalists A

GLOBAL GOLD CORPORATION ESTIMATED HUMOR SENSE OF AZERI JOURNALISTS AT ITS TRUE WORTH

PanARMENIAN.Net
14.07.2007 14:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Marjan is an unusual place to work because in some
cases we are working within 1 000 meters of the Nakhichevan border, and
Azeri soldiers are observing our work, and there have been no security
incidents during this time," chairman and CEO of Global Gold Company
(GGC) Van Krikorian stated to the PanARMENIAN.Net journalist. He said,
the Pentagon did not attend or vote at last month’s annual shareholders
meeting, and is not even on the registry.

"A review of our contracts shows that we do no work for the Pentagon,
but if there is information that the company has been working for
the Pentagon, we would ask that it be shared with us immediately and
especially any information on how much we are owed, as our accountants
do not have any record of payments," Krikorian underlined.

The Chief Executive of GGC stressed that the company takes pride in
emphasizing best practices in mining and investment areas. "Of course,
we would pay all taxes on whatever we receive as well. We’d also like
to know where the spy facility is on our license area, as I visited
Marjan along with the Hankavan, Getik, and Tukhmanuk properties where
we are working the week before last and didn’t see them. As we have
in the past, we would be pleased to have journalists visit themselves
to see exactly what we are doing in terms of mining and exploration,
and if they find anything else, we might offer them positions in our
exploration staff. Perhaps the report has confused the posting date
of Friday July 13th with April 1," Van Krikorian said.

"Quoting Armenian press" Baku based APA agency reported "GGC closely
cooperates with Armenian Defense Ministry and has invested $2.2
million in "Marjan" deposit, which is 3000 meters above the sea level".

"Unnamed source in Armenian Environmental Protection Ministry
said it is not informed of the Corporation’s activity, as it is
not allowed for that. Armenian Defense Ministry sources said the
American company is working for the Pentagon and fulfilling errands
on Iran in the territory. Local residents say they have also seen
some English-speaking military-like persons besides geologists,
who are installing unknown big facility in the territory," APA reports.

APA: Azeri, Georgian Defence Ministers Discuss Ties

AZERI, GEORGIAN DEFENCE MINISTERS DISCUSS TIES

Azerbaijani news agency APA, Baku
13 Jul 07

13 July: Georgian Defence Minister David Kezerashvili arrived on an
official visit to Azerbaijan on 12 July.

[Passage omitted: Azerbaijani Defence Minister Safar Abiyev received
his Georgian counterpart]

Abiyev said that Azerbaijani-Georgian cooperation had a strategic
nature. He called for joint efforts in the sphere of strengthening
ties, preserving regional security and restoring the two states’
territorial integrity as both countries have similar problems. Abiyev
spoke about the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict and said that Azerbaijan
preferred a peaceful solution to the conflict as the talks within
the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group continued.

"The peace talks cannot continue forever. Armenia should draw a
conclusion from this, observe international legal norms and withdraw
from occupied Azerbaijani territories. Otherwise, Azerbaijan will
liberate its lands from aggressors," Abiyev said.

Kezerashvili said that cooperation in various spheres between the
Georgian and Azerbaijani defence ministries serves the two countries’
common interests. The ministers exchanged views on prospects of
Azerbaijani-Georgian military cooperation.

Minsk Group Co-Chairs To Meet In Vienna

MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRS TO MEET IN VIENNA

Panorama.am
13:32 12/07/2007

The co-chairs of OSCE Minsk Group and Personal representative of OSCE
Chairman-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk will soon meet in Vienna. The US
Embassy public affairs officer to Azerbaijan Jonathan Henick told
the AIIA. He said that Mathew Bryza, who missed the meeting of the
mediators with Armenian Foreign Affairs Minister Vardan Oskanyan in
Paris, is expected to attend the meeting in Vienna.

Would like to remind that at the meeting held in Paris on July
10 Russian and French co-chairs have evaluated the two countries
presidents’ meeting. They have as well commented on the Armenian and
Azerbaijani orientation approach possibilities and further doings
during the negotiation processes.

No Ideal Balancing Mechanism for Government Branches Yet

NO IDEAL BALANCING MECHANISM FOR GOVERNMENT BRANCHES YET

Panorama.am
18:07 11/07/2007

The main orators at today’s conference held at Congress Hotel and
organized by the United Liberal National Party were the State and
Legal Affairs Committee Chair David Harutyunyan and RA Ombudsman Armen
Harutyunyan. In his speech David Harutyunyan mentioned that the new
Constitution misses the shortcomings that the 1995 Constitution had.

Specifically, the old Constitution centralized the government around
one person, that is the president, who was the Justice Council Chair
and could at any time wind up the parliament and it brought to crisis.

The new Constitution already gives solvations to such matters ,but
has not yet worked out a government branches balancing mechanism that
would escape a crisis.

Suppose if the president and the vice-president cannot come to a
consent concerning the government staff, the Constitution doesn’t
provide certain steps or if they have different points of view
concerning some foreign policy matters, it is no how clear whose
will be the final decision. To the question if the parliament is
not limited in his doings due to that the president can at any time
wind up the parliament if he doesn’t agree on any government project,
ex-Justice Minster said, "No, it is not. If there is majority in the
parliament then they can agree on a government project and the next
day express their unconfidence to the president".