Rebecca Curtis, Author

REBECCA CURTIS, AUTHOR

Gothamist, NY
p
Aug 16 2007

Of Rebecca Curtis, Time Out New York has said, "This is a writer who
astonishes with her versatility of styles and techniques," calling
her stories, "Wise and often emotionally devastating" The Village
Voice declared that her debut short story collection Twenty Grand,
"Showcases the talent of one of the more promising short story writers
in America today." And a boy who Rebecca had a crush on at 18 said,
after being poisoned by her, " This is the worst thing that’s ever
happened to me." Let’s see if Curtis, who certainly is as talented
and witty as the reviewers say, can talk her way out of that one!

Have you had any encounters with shysters like in your story Alpine
Slide, burned down a house like in Hungry Self, or witnessed the
death of another under similar circumstances to The Witches?

No. I wish I had though. That would be hot.

In your story Monsters, frightening beasts exist and a family must
choose which member to offer up for them to eat. How do you feel your
own family would handle this situation?

My family argues a lot and the tide really shifts. So I think it
would be whoever was in the doghouse the most recently. Like, whoever
accidentally threw away the mail that seemed like credit card offers
but was really bills, or whoever ate the ice cream and put back an
empty container, or you know, whoever forgot to clean their hair from
the shower drain. It could be anyone.

What was the most common reader reaction to this piece?

Most people seemed to find this story stupid. I know several reviewers
felt the collection would be better without it. Maybe they’re right. A
few people like it. One guy came up to me after a reading and thanked
me for writing it. I think he felt like in his family he’d be the
one to be eaten.

I liked it. I thought that the pieces that were less grounded in
reality brought an enjoyable sense of variety to the collection. Do
you often find yourself delving into the absurd?

Well, thanks. I do write absurd things a lot, often in my notebook,
and most of them are really silly and never see the light to day. But
that’s a good thing because they really are silly.

What sort of silly things do you write?

Oh, they’re too silly.

Do you ever feel torn between writing silly things and writing
serious things?

No more than I feel torn between deciding on whether to have oatmeal
or toast and eggs for breakfast. And I do feel torn about that,
all the time, because I like them both so much! Oatmeal is sweet and
satisfies that carbohydrate craving, but toast and eggs are salty and
buttery. In the end I just console myself that if I have toast and eggs
for breakfast today, I can choose oatmeal for breakfast tomorrow. Or,
you know, if I really get desperate, oatmeal for dinner.

When did you begin to write?

I wrote my first sentence at age 4! But I didn’t publish my first
book until last month.

What was the worst letter of rejection that you’ve ever gotten?

Once I sent a story to Harper’s through their slush pile. The story
was about a girl who, one day when her family is out of the house
on some errand, licks the living room rug. She’s just curious about
what it would taste like. For some reason–the fact that her whole
family has walked on it–she gets addicted to licking the rug, that
one and the other one in the house, and rugs in general, also in
other people’s houses. She tries to keep the habit secret, because
she knows it’s gross, and she’s ashamed, but one day her brother
sees her doing it… and things go badly for her from there, she
gets sent to an institution for other girls who also lick rugs. It
is, as you can see, absurd. Anyway, Harper’s didn’t like the story,
and the rejection letter said: Dear Rebecca Curtis: Thank you for
your insight on licking rugs!

At first, did your writing lean toward the more serious or the silly?

My first published stories were fairly short, and silly. When
I say short, I mean from 200 to 3,000 words. One was the story I
mentioned about the girl who becomes addicted to licking rugs–that
was a pretty developed tale of maybe 3000 words. Some shorts about a
man who wishes that one day a man would be president because in the
world of the story America has only ever had female presidents.–a
longer one about a man whose girlfriend goes with him when he needs
to get an abortion, and he’s upset because the nurses at the clinic
are a bit contemptuous of his carelessness and irresponsibility. I’m
sure these stories would be found annoyingly & blatantly political by
many people! But I had fun writing them. One was about a young lawyer
whose wife gets picked to bear the Messiah and a hot Arab guy comes
down to impregnate her, but the lawyer can’t protest, or even watch,
because it’s God. So I guess the answer is ‘silly.’

Have you had any personal experience similar to your story Twenty
Grand, where you lose something or someone only to discover their
true value afterward?

No. Someone? You mean like, break up with someone and then realize it
was true love? Are you projecting an interesting personal experience
onto the story…? Sounds intriguing.

No, I meant more of along the lines of, "You don’t know what you’ve
got until it’s gone," which could apply to a valuable coin or an
elderly relative whose kindness you never reciprocated. Have you had
an experience along those lines?

Once my mom had a set of "tricky dogs" that were magnetized and came
inside a special matchbox. The dogs were tiny, one black, one white,
terriers, and they stuck to each other’s feet, and I liked to play with
them. The matchbox they "rested inside" when I wasn’t playing with
them was a bit fragile. Also these "tricky dogs" were my mother’s,
not mine, and they lived inside her high bureau, the top part where
she kept special things like jewelry and scarves. Well one day I was
lying on her bed playing with the "tricky dogs" and I felt antsy and
busted the matchbox they lived in. I just pressed it too hard and
it smooshed flat. Then my mother ran in the room, saw the smooshed
match box, and started crying and screaming that the tricky dogs were
antique, and that now they were ruined. Being about five years old,
I didn’t quite understand and protested that the dogs were just fine,
and she explained to me, still angry and sobbing, that in order to be
of value, the dogs had to come with an original un-smooshed matchbox,
etc. I think my reaction, interior at least, was to conclude that
the world, my mother, and the notion of antiques were all dumb,
because it seemed senseless to me to care so much about whether
a match box was flattened or not. But then, at five I was a jerk,
and lots of things seemed illogical, including both my parents.

Do you have any other examples of being a jerk at young age?

Sure. Once I poisoned a guy I had a crush on, because he didn’t like
me. I wasn’t that young though. I was eighteen.

Poisoning! How’d you manage that?

Well, I can’t give away my methods. But, he was very sick for one
day exactly–so sick he couldn’t leave his room. After that he was OK
again. I think he wasn’t sure what had happened at first–he thought
he just ate something bad. When he found out he’d been poisoned–which
he found out only because I, and my friends who’d helped me, started
giggling in the halls–and then my friends felt guilty and ran to
him and confessed–and then of course, having been implicated, I also
had to confess–he was very mad. So angry, in fact, he threatened to
call the police. Also to sue me. When he threatened to sue me, I was
upset. I had no money! His eyes were very big and brown, and he seemed
very confused–in addition to angry–about the whole thing. He was a
really nice guy. Co-captain, maybe, of our university’s water polo
team, and an excellent and avid tennis player, windsurfer, sailor,
para-sailor, golfer, you get the picture. He was pre-med. He wanted
to help people. Whenever he’d had a summer job, in his life, it was
always volunteering–helping autistic kids play games, for example, at
a special camp for them, unpaid, or volunteering to help poor people
by administering shots to them, and other things like that. When I
went in to apologize to him, after he told he might call the police,
he said, "This is the worst thing that ever happened to me." I said,
"Really?" And he stared at me and said, "Yes. Absolutely. This is the
worst thing that’s ever happened to me." It was then that I began to
giggle uncontrollably.

How do you feel about it now?

I got an issue of my university’s alumni magazine and his picture was
in the back. He was still handsome, although his hair had thinned, and
he’d gained weight, and had pudge-face. He looked happy. He’s a doctor,
and involved in several outreach organizations, mostly religiously
affiliated. And he’s married. I think the picture was announcing all
these things. When I saw the picture, I was glad that he was happy. And
I thought: Could I poison him again? I was full of nostalgia.

Tell me about your novel in progress.

It’s a historical novel about an auntie’s escape from the Armenian
genocide. She was a young wife, with a newborn baby. Her husband got
sent to work on the railroads (then killed) with the other Armenian
men. A lot of Armenian women were just throwing themselves down
wells, rather than dishonor themselves by fraternizing with the
enemy. But this auntie, she went for it and married a Turkish man,
just to save her life. And her baby’s, of course. She became the 5th
woman in his harem, and rode with across Turkey on horseback. The
woman was my grandmother’s best friend, and semi-raised my mother,
who’s Armenian. She wrote a 5,000 word, very journalistic account
of her experience. My mother gave me the document when I was 14. She
thought I might want to write about it someday. Right now I’m doing
background research, and interviewing the woman’s daughters.

You’ve traveled to Europe to research your book, taught at the
University of Kansas in Lawrence, Kansas, and grew up in New
Hampshire. How do these many locals compare to New York?

The rent is cheaper.

Could you share an "only in New York" moment?

This one is complicated, but: my roommate is dating a guy, who went
to school (Yale) with my friend…and who it turns out was childhood
best friends with her ex’s best friend… because they shared a summer
house in Connecticut together. Meanwhile, they’re all novelists.

Given the opportunity, what would you change about New York?

The rent would be cheaper.

Under what circumstances would you leave New York?

Osama gets nukes.

What do you consider a perfect day of recreation in New York?

Last Sunday I walked up to Prospect Park with my sister and her
fiance. We jogged the 3 and 1/2 mile loop around it, then stopped in
a couple used bookstores and one swanky food co-op on our way back
home. We drank some creamy ice-coffees, then walked to a barbecue
in Carrol gardens in the backyard of a nice hedge-fund manager’s
brownstone. He claimed not to read books (the bookshelves were empty,
and one room upstairs was full of boxed tomes) but when I quizzed
him later, he knew all the answers. After the barbecue, a bunch of
us went to the Brooklyn Inn and drank cokes.

You can see Rebecca read on September 12th, 2007 at 8 PM at the Happy
Ending Lounge 302 Broome Street, btwn Forsyth & Eldridge Streets New
York, NY.

http://gothamist.com/2007/08/16/rebecca_curtis.ph

Serge Sargsyan And Robert Kocharyan Haven’t Solved The Underlying Is

SERGE SARGSYAN AND ROBERT KOCHARYAN HAVEN’T SOLVED THE UNDERLYING ISSUE, AND GALUST IS NOT A BAD GUY

Lragir, Armenia
Aug 16 2007

The president and the prime minister of Armenia, according to the
leader of the Democratic Way Party Manuk Gasparyan, have not solved the
underlying problem of the future of the government. Manuk Gasparyan
said on August 16 at the Friday club he doubts that the government
will name Serge Sargsyan president as long as Robert Kocharyan keeps
this question up in the air.

"The conference of the Republican Party was cancelled due to Robert
Kocharyan because there are issues which have to be settled with
Serge Sargsyan. What will Robert Kocharyan be doing after the
election? Serge Sargsyan has not answered the question whether
Robert Kocharyan will be prime minister or not? Now he is reluctant
to answer. It will be bad if he fails to answer because no candidate
might be named," Manuk Gasparyan says for Serge Sargsyan. In this case,
perhaps in his subjective opinion, Vardan Oskanyan or the head of the
president administration Armen Gevorgyan may be named president. Manuk
Gasparyan thinks so. However, he also thinks, for example, that the
ARF Dashnaktsutyun which stated to name president may fail to and
support Serge Sargsyan with some reservations.

"I am sure 90 percent that the ARF Dashnaktsutyun will name no
president. They only want to boost their importance in the government,
to vote for Serge Sargsyan. As far as I can see, the General Meeting of
the ARF Dashnaktsutyun will eventually endorse Serge Sargsyan with some
reservations. If Robert Kocharyan okays, of course. Today much depends
on Robert Kocharyan," Manuk Gasparyan says. But he also says that power
is gradually moving from Robert Kocharyan to Serge Sargsyan, and the
officials and bootlicking oligarchs who pledged allegiance to him and
had served Levon Ter-Petrosyan earlier are now going to Serge Sargsyan.

However, Manuk Gasparyan doubts this as well. He says there is
no certainty in the government camp regarding the government’s
candidate. In this connection he advises Galust Sahakyan to apologize
to the opposition who compares the meeting of the leaders with a
meeting of mice who want to find a way of ridding of the cat. Manuk
Gasparyan says if Sahakyan compares the opposition with mice, he
should compare the government with rats because the rats are more
aggressive. "If he compares the opposition with mice, he should
consider their meetings and their candidate as a gathering of rats,
frauds, cheaters, bootlickers," Manuk Gasparyan says. But he also says
Galust Sahakyan is not a bad guy and his bad reputation is because
in the previous years he was responsible for the wrongdoing of the
government, but now Galust is "out".

American Jews Have Been Deprived Of Patronage Of Watertown Authoriti

AMERICAN JEWS HAVE BEEN DEPRIVED OF PATRONAGE OF WATERTOWN AUTHORITIES IN MASSACHUSETTS

arminfo
2007-08-17 09:34:00

The Town Council of Watertown, Massachusetts, unanimously decided to
cut the connection with the Jewish All-American organization Alliance
against Terror, as the latter doesn’t recognize the Armenian Genocide.

Radio Liberty reports that the Hay Dat office in East Massachusetts
welcomes the decision of Watertown’s Town Council. Sharistan Melkonian,
Chairman of the Hay Dat office, hopes that this step will make the
Jewish organization and its leader Abraham Foxman change their position
on the Armenian Genocide and give up their efforts exerted against
recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Congress. The statement of
Marilyn Devaney, a member of the Town Council, runs that the Town
Council is concerned about the fact that the Alliance against Terror
organization denies the the horrible Armenian Genocide of 1915-1923,
therefore the Town Council can’t communicate with such organization
any longer.

Henceforth, Heart Surgeries To Be Free Of Charge For Socially Unprov

HENCEFORTH, HEART SURGERIES TO BE FREE OF CHARGE FOR SOCIALLY UNPROVIDED STRATA OF POPULATION

Noyan Tapan
Aug 15 2007

YEREVAN, AUGUST 15, NOYAN TAPAN. By the decision of the RA government,
heart surgeries will be free of charge for the members of those
families, which have 36 and higher points of vulnarability, registered
in the Vulnarability Estimation System. According to the information
provided to a Noyan Tapan correspondent by Ruslana Gevorgian, the
Advisor of the RA Minister of Health, this year the government has
allocated 170 million drams (about 500 thousand U.S. dollars) for
performing the heart surgeries of 110 patients.

Ruslana Gevorgian mentioned that patients can turn to any hospital
performing heart surgeries, where after checking the authenticity
of the document introduced by the patient, the specially formed
commissions will make a decision on performing a surgery.

The perversity of denying genocide

The Providence Journal:
/content/projo_20070815_bostom.2545880.html

ANDRE W G. BOSTOM: The perversity of denying genocide

01:00 AM EDT on Wednesday, August 15, 2007

THE CAMPAIGN sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to combat
bigotry and celebrate diversity ("No Place for Hate") has sparked bitter
resentment in Watertown, Mass., a Boston suburb whose 8,000
Armenian-Americans make up nearly 25 percent of the population. Local
Armenians do not object to the initiative, rather to the group behind
it, the ADL and its director, Abraham Foxman – whom they charge,
correctly, with denying the ugly established legacy of the World War I
era Armenian genocide.

Under the authoritarian Young Turk (Ittihadist) regime, the bulk of the
Armenian population from the territories of the Ottoman Empire – some 1
million to 1.5 million Armenians – were purged by violent and lethal
means, which reproduced the historic conditions of a classic Islamic
jihad: deportation, enslavement, forced conversion and massacre.

Mr. Foxman maintains that dismantling a program designed to fight hatred
simply because the ADL does not share what he refers to as the
"Armenians’ viewpoint" would be "bigoted." Moreover, Foxman and the ADL,
who have spoken out in recent times against ethnic cleansing of Muslims
in the Balkans and the genocide against the syncretist black African
Animist-Muslims in Darfur, are, in effect, oddly "neutral" on the
Armenian genocide: "We’re not party to this, and I don’t understand why
we need to be made party."

But even this morally challenged "neutrality" is disingenuous. According
to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency ("Turks want genocide commission,"
April 23), Mr. Foxman and the ADL are lobbying against legislation
recognizing the Armenian genocide in the U.S. House (HR 106) and the
Senate (SR 106), including the presentation of letters from the Jewish
community of Turkey complemented by, "their own [i.e., the ADL’s]
statement opposing the bill."

Interviewed for a Nov. 19, 2003, story in The Christian Science Monitor,
following the bombing of Istanbul’s two main synagogues by indigenous
Turkish jihadist groups, Rifat Bali, a scholar, and Turkish Jew,
acknowledged the chronic plight of Turkey’s small, dwindling Jewish
community, whose social condition remains little removed from the formal
"dhimmi" status of their ancestors.

Dhimmis were those non-Muslims, including Jews, subjugated by jihad and
forced to live under Islamic law as non-citizen pariahs, physically
segregated, often in squalid ghettoes, as was the case for the Jews of
Istanbul. Discriminatory regulations limited their most basic rights,
vis–vis Muslims, with regard to penal law, taxation and religious
practice. Bali’s informed remarks echoed the chronic, unresolved
concerns that led to the mass exodus of 40 percent of Turkey’s Jews to
Israel within two years of its creation in 1948, and the dual 2003
Istanbul synagogue bombings transiently illuminated a largely
marginalized society, whose shrinking numbers and "other problems" were
deliberately downplayed by community leaders:

The Turkish Jews have not been fully integrated or Turkified, and they
have had to limit their expectations. A kid grows up knowing he is never
going to become a government minister, so no one tries, and the same
goes for positions in the military.

Amoral denial of the Armenian genocide by Foxman and the ADL abets the
exploitation of beleaguered Turkish Jews as dhimmi "lobbyists" for the
government of Turkey.

Also, since 1950, both the Turkish press and Islamic literature have
steadily increased their output of theological Islamic anti-Semitism –
based upon core anti-Jewish motifs in Islam’s foundational texts – the
Koran, hadith and sira. This theologically-based anti-Jewish animus grew
steadily in stridency, and from the 1970s through the 1990s, was melded
into anti-Zionist and anti-Israel invective by Turkey’s burgeoning
fundamentalist Islamic movement.

The Armenian genocide denial "strategy" of Mr. Foxman and the ADL has
succeeded, perversely, in further isolating Jews, while failing,
abysmally, to alter a virulently anti-Semitic Turkish religious (i.e.,
Islamic), and secular culture – the latter perhaps best exemplified by
the wildly popular and most expensive film made in Turkey, Valley of the
Wolves (released in February 2006), which features an American Jewish
doctor dismembering Iraqis supposedly murdered by American soldiers to
harvest their organs for Jewish markets.

Prime Minister Recep Erdogan not only failed to condemn the film, he
justified its production and popularity. This is the same Mr. Erdogan
who, serving in 1974 as president of the Istanbul Youth Group of the
Islamic fundamentalist National Salvation Party, wrote, directed and
played the leading role in a play entitled Maskomya, staged throughout
Turkey during the 1970s. Mas-Kom-Ya was a compound acronym for
"Masons-Communists-Yahudi [Jews]," and the play focused on the evil,
conspiratorial nature of these three entities whose common denominator
was Judaism.

As a Jew, I find the efforts by Mr. Foxman and the ADL to deny
recognition of the Armenian genocide morally repugnant, ignorant and
particularly inappropriate for an organization geared to reducing, as
opposed to abetting and fomenting, anti-Semitism and other forms of
irrational hatred.

— Andrew G. Bostom, M.D., is an associate professor of medicine at the
Brown Medical School and author of The Legacy of Jihad (2005) and the
forthcoming The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism (2007)
().

http://www.projo.com/opinion/contributors
www.andrewbostom.org

Russian Journalist Said To Be Expelled From Azerbaijan

RUSSIAN JOURNALIST SAID TO BE EXPELLED FROM AZERBAIJAN

Interfax news agency, Moscow
13 Aug 07

Baku, 13 August: A Russian journalist was deported from Azerbaijan
last Sunday [12 August], a source in the republic’s law-enforcement
agencies has told Interfax-Azerbaijan.

He pointed out that the expulsion of the journalist had not been an
official deportation.

The source declined to explain the reason for expelling Yana Amelina,
a staff member of Rosbalt news agency, from Azerbaijan. The source
said that she had spent six days in the country, was detained in the
town of Lankaran [southern Azerbaijan] and taken to Baku’s airport.

"Prior to this, she managed to travel to Armenia and made an illegal
trip to the occupied territories of Azerbaijan," the source said.

The source added that Amelina had been studying "the Talysh problem"
who mainly live in Lankaran District and that "gave ground to suppose
that the journalist is not on a pro-Azerbaijani position".

Meanwhile, Azerbaijani sources quoted Amelina as saying that
Azerbaijani law-enforcers had not explained her the reasons for her
detention and expulsion. She stressed that there had been no complaints
about her documents.

3rd congress of descendants of genocide survivors important – FM

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Aug 10 2007

3rd congress of descendants of Armenian genocide survivors important,
FM states

YEREVAN, August 10. /ARKA/. RA Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian
received today Karen Mikaelyan, member of the Organizing Committee
for preparing and holding the third Congress of descendants of
survivors of the Armenian Genocide in 1915.

During the meeting, the RA Foreign Minister emphasized the importance
of holding the congress and continuing processes interrupted after
the first two congresses held in 1917 and 1918.

According to Oskanian, before holding the congress, much work should
be done in Armenian communities abroad, particularly, with social and
religious organizations in Diaspora, with all the relevant issues to
be discussed with them.

In his turn, Mikaelyan emphasized the significance and necessity of
organizing the congress, taking into account the statement of
national problems and joint efforts toward their solution.

He stated that a number of organizational meetings have been held,
and a declaration of forming authorized representative bodies has
been issued. Z. Sh. -0–

Spain Supports Establishment Of Mediterranean Union while Turkey rat

SPAIN SUPPORTS ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDITERRANEAN UNION WHILE TURKEY RATES IT AS SECOND-CLASS "CLUB MED"

PanARMENIAN.Net
10.08.2007 15:08 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s idea of a
Mediterranean Union for countries like Turkey – which he does not
want admitted to the European Union – has picked up support from
Spain, whose own Euro-Mediterranean partnership has floundered,
but is getting the cold shoulder in Turkey.

Spain’s Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos said, "The moment
has arrived … to build a real geopolitical space through the
establishment of a Mediterranean Union," which already has been
derided in Turkish newspapers as a second-class "Club Med." It would
include some EU countries bordering the Mediterranean and have its own
council of heads of state and government to set strategic policies,
a separate commission, parliament and bank, Moratinos said. The
organization would help the region tackle challenges ranging from
environmental issues to immigration, he added.

However, a senior Turkish diplomat who did not want to be named said,
"We never see the Mediterranean Union plan as an alternative to
Turkey’s EU accession.

Turkey is proceeding on the path for full membership since 1999,"
the year Ankara gained candidacy status, ABHaber reports.

The problem of opening ports for Cypriot vessels and human rights
violations remain the main obstacles for Turkey’s accession.

Cup Half Full

CUP HALF FULL

Mideast Mirror
August 7, 2007 Tuesday

The main players may have all lost out, but the results of the weekend
Lebanese by-elections stand as testimony to Lebanon’s democratic
traditions, says ‘Urayb ar-Rintawi in today’s Jordanian ad-Dustour

The weekend’s Lebanese by-elections have left many losers in their
wake, claims a leading Jordanian commentator. Most of the political
participants in that game have emerged as losers, but Lebanon and
its democratic traditions have emerged as the main winners.

[The deadlocked struggle between the pro-U.S. government and
mainly Shiite opposition deepened yesterday (Monday) after a tense
parliamentary election showed a sharp divide among Christians, a
key swing bloc. That deadlock was reinforced when pro-government
candidate Amin Gemayel, a former president and the head of one
of Lebanon’s most powerful Maronite Christian families, conceded
defeat by a mere 418 votes in Sunday’s election in the Christian
stronghold of Metn north of Beirut. The victor was little-known
Kamil Khoury, who was backed by the most prominent Christian leader
in the pro-Syrian opposition, Michel Aoun. Khoury took 39,534 votes
to Gemayel’s 39,116. Many fear the deepening stalemate may lead to
the formation of competing governments if it is not resolved before
the race to replace pro-Syrian President Emile Lahoud, whose term
ends Nov. 23. Under Lebanon’s division of power among its sects,
the presidency must be held by a Maronite Christian chosen parliament.

Now, no Maronite leader can boost his bid among lawmakers by claiming
to represent the entire community. Gemayel’s loss is a setback for
his potential as a candidate. Aoun has said he will stand for the
presidency. But the slimness of Kamil Khoury’s victory Sunday damages
his patron Aoun’s attempts to present himself as the top Christian
politician. Gemayel got more of the Maronite vote than his rival —
75 percent, according to press reports. But Aoun’s candidate made up
for it by winning other Christians’ votes. Gemayel supporters blamed
his loss on the large ethnic Armenian community in the Metn district
and said Kamil Khoury was not representative of the Maronites, who
form a majority in the district and are the largest Christian sect
in Lebanon. Armenians are largely Catholic or Orthodox Christian.

Another election Sunday was to replace lawmaker Walid Eido, a Sunni
Muslim who was killed in a June car bombing there. A pro-government
candidate, Mohammed al-Amin Itani, won that race easily.]

LOSERS ALL: "I cannot find one single winner in Lebanon’s weekend
by-elections," writes ‘Urayb ar-Rintawi in Tuesday’s Amman daily
ad-Dustour.

They all seem to be losers! Losers! [Pro-government Maronite leader
of the Phalange Party and former president] Amin Gemayel seems to be
the greatest loser. He first inherited his parliamentary seat for the
Metn area from his uncle Maurice Gemayel in 1971. He then inherited
his brother [Bashir] as president after a powerful bomb killed him on
the threshold of Ba’abda Presidential Palace in 1982. But he failed
to inherit his own [assassinated] son, minister and MP Pierre Gemayel.

He failed despite the firm coalition between [Sunni Future Current
billionaire leader Sa’d] Hariri’s money, [Maronite Lebanese Forces’
leader] Geagea’s public, and [Druze pro-government leader] Jumblatt’s
noise, and despite the support he received from the international
community and the capitals of Arab moderation – in fact, despite
exploiting widowers and bereaved mothers as an integral part of his
‘electoral machine’ in pursuit of sympathy, solidarity, and backing
from the voters.

[Anti-government Maronite leader] General Michel ‘Aoun is the second
greatest loser. From now on, he will no longer be able to claim
to speak on behalf of 70% of the Christians – and the Maronites in
particular. The man who swept over the Christian areas in 2005 and
deserved Jumblatt’s description of him as a ‘tsunami’, could barely
get more than 400 votes more for his candidate Kamil Khouri over his
opponent Amin Gemayel.

Had it not been for the Armenian vote, Aoun would have totally lost
face. But the Armenian Tashnaq Party and Christian anti-government
leader Michel Murr saved the day for him, and inflicted a defeat
on the Phalange leader and the [anti-Syria] March 14th candidate
[Gemayel] in Btighrin (Murr’s stronghold) and Burj Hammoud (the
Armenians’ stronghold.)

MP Sa’d Hariri – a sheikh, son of a sheikh, and grandson of a sheikh –
was also among the major losers. Sunni Beirut was too lazy to go to
the ballot box in large numbers despite the intensive campaigns led by
Sheikh Sa’d personally, despite his daily and repeated invocation of
[his father, former assassinated Lebanese PM Rafiq] Hariri’s blood, and
despite the enormous financial and religious institutional mobilization
which turned Dar al-Ifta’ [the highest Sunni religious establishment
in the country] into an electoral office for the Future Current. Still,
the level of Beiruti participation in the election did not exceed 20%.

So, who won these elections? It can be said without exaggeration that
at least some Lebanese democratic traditions have won:

First, the army won by adopting neutrality and as a result of its
success in maintaining law and order which faced a genuine threat of
breaking down because of the sharp degree of polarization.

Second, the government succeeded by adopting a neutral position
– relatively, if not absolutely – despite the fact that it was a
party to the conflict. The government succeeded in carrying out its
professional duties, setting all petty calculations aside.

Third, the Lebanese justice system also succeeded in saving the ballot
boxes at the eleventh hour after they were almost cancelled due to
suspicions of electoral fraud.

Finally, and at many levels, the Lebanese people succeeded, despite
the fact that they have been split into warring communities. And this
should provide everyone with evidence of the dangers of sectarian
politics and ‘Lebanonization.’ It should provide them with evidence of
the terrible outcome of foreign intervention in the domestic affairs
of any country.

Still, Lebanon rose as a witness to political and intellectual
pluralism and to the responsible nature of its elite even when they
are at the peak of their irresponsibility. The country stands as
witness to the independence and integrity of its judiciary.

"Are there any better lessons than these for us all to learn instead
of confining ourselves to empty talk and shedding tears over the
empty half of the Lebanese cup?" asks Rintawi in conclusion.

Two Armenian Boxers To Fight For Title Of World Champion

TWO ARMENIAN BOXERS TO FIGHT FOR TITLE OF WORLD CHAMPION

Panorama.am
18:18 07/08/2007

World IBM Champion in mid-weight, Arthur Abraham, will compete with
Khoren Gevor in order to keep to his title. The two Armenian boxers are
living in Germany now. They will go on ring on August 18 in Germany.

Khoren Gevor is in the 5th place in mid-weight IBM category. "I will
do everything to win," the boxer announced after getting his right to
compete with Arthur Abraham. His coach has told Allboxing.ru "Abraham
may be defeated," also saying they have worked hard to get ready for
the battle.