Upcoming Armenian Genocide Commemoration in Montebello

Armenian Genocide United Commemoration Committee
1901 N. Allen Ave.
Altadena, CA 90001
626.794.2722
626.296.2922 fax

Contact: Ara Aharonian, Chairman
Email: [email protected]

March 19, 2008 press release

UPCOMING ARMENIAN GENOCIDE COMMEMORATION IN MONTEBELLO

This April 24 marks the 93rd anniversary of the Armenian
Genocide. As in previous years, the Armenian nation will commemorate
the martyrs of the Genocide. By commemorating Armenians pay tribute to
their ancestors. This has also become a tradition for the new
generation, in order to keep alive the torch of the Armenian struggle
until its just and complete resolution.

Today, the Turkish government not only denies the Genocide, but
also spares nothing to revise history in an effort to confuse the
world. The more Turkey continues this denialist policy, the more we, as
Armenians, must demonstrate strong will and commitment. Thus, while our
cause is symbolically represented by April 24, it cannot be limited to
commemorations on that day. Our multi-faceted cause demands continuous
work, coordination, and a united spirit between Armenia and the Diaspora.

Manifesting our united spirit, this year the Armenian Genocide
United Commemoration Committee has decided to organize a pilgrimage to
the Armenian Martyrs Memorial Monument at Bicknell Park in Montebello,
California. Each participant will be given a chance to place a flower
in memory of the victims, and join our brothers and sisters in the
homeland, who traditionally make the same pilgrimage to the
Dzidzernagapert Martyrs Memorial Complex.

The Armenian Genocide United Commemoration Committee will
provide free transportation to those who wish to participate in this
program. The pilgrimage will continue every year, in order to make it a
tradition.

Our national consciousness demands that every Armenian
participate not only in commemorative activities, but also become active
in the pursuit of the Armenian Cause.

Amendments Envisaged In Current Law On Ensuring Security Of Persons

AMENDMENTS ENVISAGED IN CURRENT LAW ON ENSURING SECURITY OF PERSONS SUBJECT TO SPECIAL STATE PROTECTION

Noyan Tapan
March 17, 2008

YEREVAN, MARCH 17, NOYAN TAPAN. The RA National Assembly on March 19
discussed in the first reading the bill envisaging an amendment and
an addition to the RA Law on Ensuring Security of Persons Subject to
Special State Protection.

In the words of the main speaker, justice minister Gevorg Danielian,
the purpose of the government-submitted bill is to regulate the
relations connected to renunciation of the right of state protection
by retired president of the RA, as well as by state officials,
public, political, religious and other figures entitled to state
protection. The bill proposes stipulating that objects of state
protection may renounce state protection by informing the head of
the state protection service about it in writing.

The president, the speaker of the National Assembly and the prime
minister are an exception: according to the current law, during their
term of office, they have no right to renounce state protection. A
retired president of the RA, who, by the law, is provided with
lifelong personal state protection, also has the right to renounce
state protection.

G. Danielian said that the bill also regulates the obligations of
employees of the authorized body ensuring security of state protection
– in case of offences committed by state protection objects. The
bill envisages that in case of offiences committed by an object
of state protection, except the RA president, NA speaker and prime
minister, employees of the authorized body ensuring security of state
protection have to inform immediately the object that his/her state
protection may not be continued as illegal actions are being taken
by the object. Besides, the head of the group implementing state
protection has to immediately report the head of the authorized body
about expediency of further protection.

According to G. Danielian, if an object of state protection continues
taking illegal actions, then with the authorized body’s permission,
state protection employees have the right to stop protection of the
object and refrain from taking an indirect part in illegal actions
or from protecting the person taking illegal actions.

Most Of UN Member Countries Do Not Accept Position Of Azerbaijan On

MOST OF UN MEMBER COUNTRIES DO NOT ACCEPT POSITION OF AZERBAIJAN ON NKR PROBLEM

Noyan Tapan
March 17, 2008

YEREVAN, MARCH 17, NOYAN TAPAN. On March 14 a resolution presented
by Azerbaijan, the object of which is to provide an international
assistance to the Azerbaijani commentaries concerning the Nagorno
Karabakh problem, was discussed in the UN General Assembly. According
to the information provided to Noyan Tapan by the Press and Information
Department of the RA Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the OSCE Minsk Group
Co-Chairmen countries: the United States of America, France and Russia,
as well as Armenia and a number of other countries voted against that
draft resolution. About 150 countries abstained or did not take part
in the ballot and only 39 countries supported the resolution. Those
countries are members of GUAM or the Organization of Islamic Conference
(OIC).

Irrespective of the circumstance that the not obliging resolution
was accepted by the General Assembly, the refusal of the position of
Azerbaijan by the majority is the real index of the dispositions of
the international community concerning the Nagorno Karabakh problem.

Estimating the results of the ballot, RA Minister of Foreign Affairs
Vardan Oskanian said: "I hope that Azerbaijan received a distinct
mark by the international community. With the leadership of the
co-Chairmen the majority of the UN member countries refused the
unilateral approach."

Vardan Oskanian described the resolution as double-faced: "On the one
hand it is trying to misinform, as in contains a provision supporting
the OSCE Minsk process, and on the other hand Azerbaijan ostentatiously
scoffed the position of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmen. The
Co-Chairmen distinctly declared that they will not support the draft
resolution and, in fact, voted against."

"Now, we are interested in the next steps of Azerbaijan," the
Minister said.

"We want to clarify whether the object of this resolution was to
dissolve the negotiation process or now after receiving the mark of the
international community they will return to the table of negotiations
to work upon finding a stable regulation based on compromises."

"Refusing the resolution presented by Azerbaijan, the International
community confirmed its approval concerning the document existing
on the table of the negotiations today, which succesfully unites the
two principles of the Helsinki Final Act: the principles of the free
self-determination of nations and territorial completeness, which seem
to be mutually exclusive from the first sight," the RA Minister of
Foreign Affairs mentioned. "This document gives a unique opportunity
for Armenians and Azerbaijanis to move forward. This is what discerns
the Nagorno Karabakh problem from all the other conflicts existing
in our region and Europe and makes it peculiar not only from legal
and historival point of view but also with an innovative negotiation
approach, the object of which is to find a realistic solution."

Oskanian: Armenia Needs Europe’s Support

OSKANIAN: ARMENIA NEEDS EUROPE’S SUPPORT

PanARMENIAN.Net
17.03.2008 18:45 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On March 15-16, Armenia’s Foreign Minister Vartan
Oskanian participated in Brussels Forum 2008, the RA MFA press
office said.

In his speech the Armenian Minister touched upon the February 19
presidential election, describing the post-election events as a
temporary departure from democracy and lack of public trust in
political and social institutes.

Minster Oskanian mentioned media and education as priorities of
Armenia-Europe cooperation. "Now, Armenia needs Europe’s support as
never before," he said.

Vartan Oskanian also met with EU High Representative for the Common
Foreign and Security Policy Javier Solana to discuss the ways of
normalization of the post-election situation in Armenia.

Heritage Party Calls For National Solidarity

HERITAGE PARTY CALLS FOR NATIONAL SOLIDARITY

arminfo
2008-03-17 17:05:00

ArmInfo. The oppositional Heritage Party made a statement on March 17.

The authors of the document criticized the Feb 19 presidential election
in Armenia, as well as the campaigns that preceded it and the events
that followed it, qualifying them as "human rights violations". "But
for the forcible dispersal of Liberty Square in the early March 1
morning, the tragedy of that night would not have befallen the nation",
the statement says.

"Heritage Party calls for national solidarity, a multi-partisan
public project for a dignified dialogue, the release of obviously
political detainees, and an immediate plenipotentiary inquiry into
the tragedy of March 1, its causes and consequences, whose just
and comprehensive findings might help the recovery of democracy in
Armenia", the statement says.

President Kocharyan Received The Prince Of Saudi Arabia

PRESIDENT KOCHARYAN RECEIVED THE PRINCE OF SAUDI ARABIA

armradio.am
17.03.2008 12:28

President Robert Kocharyan received the Prince of the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia Prince Al-Walid bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud and Princess
Amira, President’s Press Office reported.

Greeting the high guests, the President said Armenia has extremely
warm, broad and multilayer relations with many countries of the Arab
world. He attached particular importance to the role of the Armenian
community in the development of those relations.

The Prince of Saudi Arabia emphasized his warm feelings for the
Armenian people and noted that he has many Armenian friends. He said
that being interested in Armenia, they have the objective to study
the investment opportunities of the country, especially in the fields
of tourism and hotel business.

Noting that the spheres they are interested in are the priority
directions of Armenia’s economic development, Robert Kocharyan said the
Armenian Government will demonstrate serious readiness to cooperate.

No new incidents in Nagorno-Karabakh – Yerevan

Interfax News Agency, Russia
March 13 2008

No new incidents in Nagorno-Karabakh – Yerevan

YEREVAN

There have been no new incidents at the dividing line between
Azerbaijan and the self-proclaimed Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh,
Armenian Prime Minister Vartan Oskanian said, adding that he hoped
the ceasefire will hold.

"There was a provocation on the part of Azerbaijan, but we cut it
short. Azerbaijan continues to spread false information that shooting
continues and that it is incurring losses. We refute all this
information," Oskanian told a press conference in Yerevan on
Thursday.

"We do not know how the Azeri side explains these victims, where do
they take these numbers from. Most probably, these are the people
that were killed on March 4," he said.

Commenting on reports in the Azeri media that an operation against
Kurds on the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh was possible, Oskanian
said, "This is a lie and a provocation on the part of Azerbaijan."

"This information has as its goal to influence the international
community and bolster the Azeri-Turkish alliance. The Armenian
Foreign Ministry carefully followed these statements," he said.

The Armenian Foreign Ministry is contacting all the people the Azeri
media have referred to. "These people are surprised that somebody has
been making such statements on their behalf. There is no truth here,"
he said.

According to Armenia, a subversive Azeri group violated the ceasefire
and attacked the advance post of the army of Nagorno-Karabakh near to
Levonarkh in Martakert district and temporarily occupied it, before
it was forces to retreat to its earlier positions through response
actions and losses.

The Nagorno-Karabakh Foreign Ministry demanded that the Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) send a monitoring
mission. The monitoring was planned for March 7, but it was conducted
only on the Karabakh side, Armenia said.

Presidential spokesman downplays EU concern over arrests in Armenia

Mediamax, Armenia
March 14 2008

PRESIDENTIAL SPOKESMAN DOWNPLAYS EU’S CONCERN OVER ARRESTS IN ARMENIA

Yerevan, 14 March: The law enforcement agencies should be guided by
the provisions of the law in their actions and befree from any
pressure, including external pressure, Armenian president’s press
secretary Viktor Soghomonyan hassaid.

He made the statement when commenting on the statement by the
European Union presidency [as received] that voicesconcern about the
ongoing arrests in Armenia.

"Those who are being arrested are not simply representatives of the
opposition but are individuals accused ofcommitting crimes. There is
not a single European country where being involved in politics is not
an indulgence [asreceived] to exonerate a citizen from responsibility
for law violations," Soghomonyan said.

Touching upon the European bodies’ calls on the Armenian authorities
to take all the necessary steps for easing the tension, he said that
"this is exactly the core of all our actions."

[In a separate report, 0824 gmt 14 Mar 08, Mediamax quoted Heikki
Talvitie, special representative of the OSCEchairman-in-office, as
saying that the Armenian authorities should lift the state of
emergency in the country in therun-up to the inauguration of the new
president and start dialogue with the opposition.]

Micheline Marcom Reads @ Elliott Bay Books Tonight

Seattlest, Seattle
March 14 2008

Micheline Marcom Reads @ Elliott Bay Books Tonight

Micheline Aharonian Marcom reads from her new novel tonight at
Elliott Bay Books at 7:30 pm, at 101 South Main Street.

When we first wandered over to the Seattlest Arts Desk to pick up our
review copy of Draining the Sea, we’d never heard of Micheline
Aharonian Marcom. Turns out this Saudi-born, LA-raised child of an
American and a Lebanese-Armenian is the author of two critically
acclaimed earlier novels: Three Apples Fell From Heaven and The
Daydreaming Boy. Who knew? Back in 2001, reviewing Three Apples in
the New York Times, Margot Livesey wrote that, "The fierce beauty of
her prose both confronts readers with many breathtaking cruelties and
carries us past them." Such a description recalls the Cormac McCarthy
of Blood Meridian, in which endless passages describe the
breathtaking natural beauty of the Southwest with such vivid
intensity that the reader is easily dragged into the booby-trap of
McCarthy’s brutally twisted violence (baby tree, anyone?).
Unfortunately, to judge Marcom by Draining the Sea, it would seem
that Livesey’s observation is as much a prescription for long slog of
a read as for a literary masterpiece.

One need only crack a copy of Draining the Sea to discover that
Marcom’s style is dense and darkly lyrical. The narrator inhabits a
phantasmagorical Los Angeles, where he spends his days collecting the
carcasses of dead dogs off the roads and grappling with his memories
of the Guatemalan civil war and Marta, a woman he both loved and
likely killed, as well as his family’s experience of the Armenian
genocide (this is Marcom’s central theme through all her books,
apparently). Written in a hallucinatory stream-of-consciousness,
Marcom’s prose twists and turns poetically. Take, for instance, this
single sentence:

This is my inquiry, an inquisition of the air: you say that you
cannot be undone, and you say (with your looking) that I am a beast
of clean proportions; you say nothing with your words, in fact you
have no words in my language (and I none in yours) and you insist in
your dark cold chambers, in the capital of darkness, you bring me
there, into the pit with you, with the other handless corpses, the
half-deads, the unclosed eyes of the dying: you, the rats and diptera
girls, and faceless cockless boys, and black bowed beetles, and
intrepid moths on your skin eyelids – that I stay with you in that
place, that I take up your hands (beautiful veins of indifference)
and bundle that unringed, unpainted fingers fingernails to your
mother in the Highlands: to your dead mother, the dead brothers and
father, the crucified brother, who beat each other in the winters and
for whom hunger is like an iron fist: send them these artifacts of
the body, you say; rescue me from this hole, this hollow they’ve made
for the half-deads, and I am crying uncontrollably now at the side of
the freeway, and I can’t see you amidst the piles and it is you and
then it is my mother giving me her five phrases about the Armenian
grandmother when I am a boy, and the long distances between home and
here, and then it is me, alone in my car, driving along the 405.
On the one hand, this is an act of literary bravura, a sentence
constructed with a poet’s sense of flow and a technician’s precision,
that unfolds and blossoms like a flower bud, as layer upon layer of
language opens up. There’s three parenthetical phrases, three colons,
and two semi-colons in one sentence. An impressive feat all around.
On the other hand, it’s nearly meaningless. What are "beautiful veins
of indifference" or "skin eyelids" besides pretty phrases? And
perhaps most problematically for a first-person narrative, who on
earth would talk like that, let alone think like that?

Still, accusing a book of obscurantism and aloofness is an easy bomb
to lob, and we found ourselves reconsidering leaving our review at
that, once we read Irene Wanner’s piece this morning in The Seattle
Times. "Day by day, as I slogged through my appointed pages," writes
Wanner, "I became increasingly frustrated. How could Marcom indulge
herself with such language? She had received several of the writing
world’s juiciest plums – a Lannan Literary Fellowship, a PEN USA
Literary Award for Fiction, a Whiting Writers’ Award – yet this book
circled on and on and on … to what purpose?"

That’s not just unfair, it’s lacking in subtlety. Yes, the prose is
obscure and dense, but it’s not a simple stylistic choice as Wanner
seems to imply. In fact, for the genre, this is par for the course;
there are rules to writing witness literature, and Marcom – to her
detriment, in fact – is playing by the rules.

As the above passage makes patently clear, the purpose for this
seemingly impenetrable stream-of-consciousness is its ability to
collapse time and space. In one single, strung-out sentence, we flow
from LA’s super-highways through a Guatemalan Indian’s homeland, all
the way back to the inherited memory of the genocide. The effect is
to make the historically and geographically distant immediate and
personal. As a device, its purpose is just the same (and just as
central to the author’s project) as Jonathan Safran Foer’s use of
multiple layers of narrative in Everything is Illuminated (about the
Holocaust) and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (about Sept. 11).
But Foer’s internal narratives, through which we in the present
experience the past, leave these psychically traumatic events safely
contextualized, first by the nature of being in the past, and then,
as the narrative takes on its surreal qualities and the boundaries
between past and present blur, by the awareness of the fictive nature
of the device.

We doubt that Marcom’s book is going to stand the test of time to
become a classic, or even, for that matter, garnish much attention
from the media. But while she may have weaknesses and pretensions,
the project of Draining the Sea is ambitious, and she deserves at
least credit for that. This being the third novel in a projected
trilogy about the Armenian genocide and its aftermath, perhaps she
can now move on to new subjects for which her considerable gifts are
suited, and manage to write a truly great novel.

marco.php

http://seattlest.com/2008/03/14/micheline_

Armenia Should Recognize Karabakh Independence

ARMENIA SHOULD RECOGNIZE KARABAKH INDEPENDENCE

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.03.2008 16:57 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia should recognize independence of Nagorno
Karabakh but not the right of Karabakhi people to self-determination,
former NKR Foreign Minister Arman Melikyan said.

"Many opponents do not recognize Karabakh, noting ironically that
Armenia itself doesn’t do it. We should recognize independence of
Nagorno Karabakh and I am confident that this motion will gain
support," Melikyan told "Kosovo precedent. Can it be applied to
Artsakh?" seminar.

After Armenia’s recognition of NKR independence, Karabakh’s borders
should be fixed, according to him.

"Our problems began when Armenia agreed to territorial haggle. But
we can’t cede territories which belong to Karabakh by law," Melikyan
said, reminding of 500 thousand of Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan.

"These people should live on a territory controlled legally by the
NKR and should be granted citizenship.

>From the standpoint of international law, the Kosovo precedent offers
Armenia a possibility to ground its moves," he said.

"We should decide whether Karabakh is an independent state or a part
of Armenia," he emphasized, Novosti Armenia reports.