BAKU: Ganira Pashayeva: "No Azerbaijani Can Agree To Turkish Preside

GANIRA PASHAYEVA: "NO AZERBAIJANI CAN AGREE TO TURKISH PRESIDENT’S VISIT TO ARMENIA"

Azeri Press Agency
Sept 2 2008
Azerbaijan

Baku. Elbrus Seyfullayev-APA. "No Azerbaijani can agree to Turkish
President’s visit to Armenia. This visit hurts us morally. That’s why
I will await till the last minute that Abdullah Gul will refuse the
visit. Abdullah Gul himself said he was assessing the invitation. I
think while assessing the invitation Gul should take into consideration
opinion inside Turkey and position of Azerbaijani public," MP Ganira
Pashayev told APA.

The parliamentarian said those who compare Gul’s visit to Yerevan
with Azerbaijani officials’ meetings with Armenian representatives
are wrong.

"Firstly, Azerbaijani representatives do not visit Armenia to meet
with Armenians. Secondly, these meetings are held concretely in
connection with Nagorno Karabakh conflict and with mediation of OSCE
Minsk Group. If Abdullah Gul had met with Serzh Sarkisian in another
country or within the framework of an event, this would not have
caused such many discussions," she said.

To her, if Abdulla Gul visits Armenia, the statements he will make
there are very important: "If Abdualla Gul meets with Armenian
Mass Media and makes strict statements that Armenia has occupied
Azerbaijan’s territories and no relations will be established until
the liberation of occupied lands and Turkey does not establish
any relations with Armenia after the visit, it will ease us a
little. That’s why, the statements he will make there and steps to
be taken by Turkey after the visit are very important".

Week Of Lebanon’s Culture Being Held In Armenia From August 27 To Se

WEEK OF LEBANON’S CULTURE BEING HELD IN ARMENIA FROM AUGUST 27 TO SEPTEMBER 2

Noyan Tapan

Au g 29, 2008

YEREVAN, AUGUST 29, NOYAN TAPAN. Naregatsi Art Union (NAU) with the
support of Ministries of Culture of the RA and the Republic of Lebanon,
as well as with the support of the two countries’ Embassies holds
a Week of Lebanon’s Culture from August 27 to September 2. During
these days the Armenian audience will get acquainted with Lebanon’s
rich culture. A celebration devoted to the Lebanese poet Gibran
Kahlil Gibran will be held at the RA Writers’ Union, Fayha Choir will
give concerts, the performance of An Unfinished Novel will be on in
Hovhannes Toumanian State Puppet Theatre based on the play of the
same name by Lebanese-Armenian writer Ara Artsrouni.

Within the framework of the week an exhibition of Lebanese-Armenian
artist Raffi Antonian’s works opened at NAU on August 27. The
traditions and everyday life of the inhabitants of Mousa Dag prevail
in the thematics of the artist’s works.

As Fayha’s artistic director Pargev Taslakian noted during the
press-conference on the same day, Arabic, French, Iraqi and Armenian
songs are included in the song-list of the choir founded in 2003. Fayha
is a laureate of a number of international contests, it released its
first album in 2007, it has also participated in the musical setting
of a number of films. In 2008 the choir will perform in Italy, Egypt,
France and Lebanon.

In the words of contemporary Arab poet Henri Zogeyb, he is very
glad that Gibran Kahlil Gibran’s works are being translated into
Armenian. He hopes that Armenian readers who strive for peace, love
and justice will also be inspired with the works of the great poet.

Riad Alamedi, director of the Culture Department of Safadi Fund
of Lebanon, said that there is a great wish to organize a Week of
Armenia’s Culture in Lebanon. It was also mentioned that 500 thousand
Armenians live in Lebanon and that they have made a great contribution
to the development of Lebanese culture.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=116943

ANKARA: Eyewitness Says Osman Hayal Was Accomplice To Dink’s Murdere

EYEWITNESS SAYS OSMAN HAYAL WAS ACCOMPLICE TO DINK’S MURDERER

Today’s Zaman
Sept 2 2008
Turkey

An anonymous eyewitness in the murder case of Turkish-Armenian
journalist Hrant Dink, shot dead by a teenager over a year ago,
confirmed that Osman Hayal was with Ogun Samast at the time of
the murder.

The eyewitness stated that Osman Hayal — the elder brother of Yasin
Hayal, who instigated the murder — was with Samast, who was 17 at
the time of the murder, when he murdered Dink on Jan. 19, 2007, in
broad daylight outside the office of Agos, a newspaper where Dink
was the editor-in-chief. Osman Hayal denies the eyewitness’s claims.

The anonymous eyewitness said: "Osman Hayal and another person with
curly hair were there. They were standing in front of an Akbank
on the street. After the event happened, Osman Hayal turned to the
other two people and nodded. After that he escaped in the direction
of Mecidiyeköy."

Osman Hayal rejects the claims, but police sources note that there
were serious discrepancies in Hayal’s depositions. Hayal claims that
he got on a bus at around 3 p.m. and for this reason emphasized he
was on the bus at 4 p.m. when the event took place. "I do not know
exactly where I was when the event took place, but I was probably
going to Trabzon by bus." A bus takes about 18 hours to travel from
İstanbul to Trabzon but Hayal also claims that he learned about the
incident while watching TV with his mother. However, according to
Hayal’s claim about his being on the bus, he could not have been in
Trabzon before noon of the next day. He missed this important detail.

Osman Hayal had claimed previously that he was not in İstanbul on
the day of murder but later it was proved that his mobile phone
signaled from İstanbul’s Umraniye district on Jan. 19, 2007, at
11:27 a.m. Responding to why he lied, Hayal said: "I said I was in
Trabzon because I was very sad and bothered as my brother was involved
in this event. I said this because I was deeply hurt. I did not say
that I was in İstanbul thinking that it would change anything as I
was not involved in this event."

–Boundary_(ID_h8v0PZwbTNOApkN0toi9v A)–

Georgia: Moscow accuses west of double =?unknown?q?standards=B7?=

Georgia: Moscow accuses west of double standards·
Nato has no moral right to lecture us, says Kremlin
· EU backs off from threat of sanctions over Georgia

Luke Harding in Moscow

The Guardian,
Saturday August 30 2008

Russia bitterly accused the west of bias and double standards
yesterday, following international criticism of its actions in Georgia,
and amid signs that the European Union is backing away from sanctions
against Moscow.

Russia’s foreign ministry said it rejected criticism from the G7 group
of industrialised countries. They condemned its invasion of Georgia,
and its recognition on Tuesday of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as
independent.

"This step is biased and aimed at justifying the aggressive actions of
Georgia," the ministry said, adding that the G7 – Britain, France,
Germany, the US, Italy, Japan and Canada – had made "baseless
assertions about Russia undermining Georgia’s territorial integrity".

Russia foreign ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko criticised Nato for
"putting pressure" on Russia and said there could be "irreversible
consequences" for "stability" in Europe. Nato had no "moral right" to
lecture Russia, he said.

The Kremlin’s defiant tone comes ahead of a special EU summit in
Brussels on Monday, called by France, to discuss the EU’s future ties
with Russia. On Thursday, France’s foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner,
intimated that sanctions would be discussed. Yesterday, the EU appeared

to be retreating from this position.

Moscow has made clear it will respond to any punitive measures from
Brussels, which could include the suspension of a new EU-Russia
partnership agreement. "The time to pass sanctions has certainly not
come," said a diplomat from France, which holds the EU presidency.

Analysts in Moscow said last night that Russia’s leadership was
relatively unconcerned about the threat of EU sanctions. "I don’t think
the contemporary west has any means to punish a state that is not quite
a rogue state," Yulia Latynina, a commentator with the independent Echo
of Moscow radio station told the Guardian. She added: "The Kremlin
didn’t take Tbilisi and didn’t shoot [Mikheil] Saakashvili. Expelling
Russia from the G8 or the World Trade Organisation isn’t important."

Strategically, she said, prime minister Vladimir Putin has satisfied
his personal feeling towards Mr Saakashvili. "The war was brilliant in
its design."

Other analysts said they did not expect Russia to reverse its
recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, despite the prospect of the
states’ international isolation. So far, only Belarus had said it will
join Russia in recognising the two states.

"I think they are watching very closely to see what will happen at the
EU summit," said Grigorii V Golosov, professor at the faculty of
political sciences at the European University of St Petersburg. "But I
think the Kremlin calculation is th
at the EU won’t react seriously."

Putin’s interview with CNN on Thursday – in which he blamed the war in
Georgia on a Washington plot to propel John McCain into the White House
– was a deliberate tactic, Golosov said. Putin’s aim was to promote
divisions between the EU and Washington.

Yesterday, Igor Sechin, the deputy prime minister, dismissed a report
in the Daily Telegraph that Moscow was preparing to cut oil deliveries
to western Europe, calling the claim "a gross provocation".

BAKU: Thomas Goltz: "Azerbaijani Government Should Be Careful With T

THOMAS GOLTZ: "AZERBAIJANI GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE CAREFUL WITH THIS SITUATION"

Azeri Press Agency
Aug 29 2008
Azerbaijan

Baku. Lachin Sultanova-APA. "Developments in the region are dangerous
for Azerbaijan, but I don’t believe that analogical events will recur
there in near future", said professor at US Montana University Thomas
Goltz told APA.

He said there were both similar and different aspects between Nagorno
Karabakh and the conflicts in Georgia. The Professor thinks that
long-term tensions between Russia and Georgia led Russia to launch
strong military strikes on Georgia. "Terms between Vladimir Putin and
Mikhail Saakashvili are not good. But situation related to Azerbaijan
is different. There are good relations between Azerbaijan and Russia,
between Ilham Aliyev and Russian leadership".

Goltz noted that the situation was not similar, but warned Azerbaijani
Government to be careful. The Professor thinks that Azerbaijan
should continue its "quadrate policy". "It means that Baku should
continue friendship and partnership with Russia in the North, Iran
in the South, China in the East and the United States in the West
and protect the balance".

Responding to question about possibility of Azerbaijan’s intentions
for NATO membership to provide its security, Goltz said it would be
a suicide.

Ceremonial Occasions In Stepanakert

CEREMONIAL OCCASIONS IN STEPANAKERT

AZG Armenian Daily
29/08/2008

Nagorno Karabakh

On the occasion of the 17th anniversary of declaration of NKR
independence ceremonial occasions are scheduled in Stepanakert. As
member of the coordination and management commission Michael Gasparian
told Armenpress, the first lesson in the secondary schools and high
educational institutions of the republic on September 1 will be
devoted to the declaration of independence.

At the event that has become traditional members of NKR Government,
Parliament and National Security Service will present at the schools
and universities the way and the sense of NKR independence.

On September 2 at 10 a.m. NKR soldiers will march along the streets
of Stepanakert that will herald the start of the ceremonial events.

The officials and citizens of the country led by NKR President Bako
Sahakian will pay a visit to the city memorial.

At 8 p.m an open-air concert in Stepanakert Renaissance Square will
mark the occasion. Fireworks will close the concert.

Economic Cooperation Between Armenia And Belarus Has A Great Potenti

ECONOMIC COOPERATION BETWEEN ARMENIA AND BELARUS HAS A GREAT POTENTIAL OF DEVELOPMENT

armradio.am
27.08.2008 14:40

RA Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan received the Ambassador Extraordinary
and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Belarus to Armenia Marina
Dolgopolova, who is completing her mission in our country.

Thanking the Ambassador for the productive activity in Armenia for over
five years, the Prime Minister noted that serious positive progress
has been registered in the relations between the two countries in this
period both in political and other spheres. He attached particular
importance to the considerable progress in the bilateral relations
especially under the conditions of the difficulties existing in the
field of transport.

Marina Dolgopolova underlined that being the first Ambassador of
the Republic of Belarus to Armenia, she proceeded to the deepening
of relations with all responsibility. She noted with appreciation
that good bases exist today for developing the mutually beneficial
cooperation between the two countries. Presenting the obvious
achievements in the political, economic, scientific, educational,
cultural and other spheres, the Ambassador especially emphasized the
cooperation in the fields of innovation, information technologies,
development of regions and small settlements.

During the conversation the parties stated that despite the recent
considerable increase of the volume of commodity turnover, the economic
collaboration20between the two countries still has a great potential of
development. In this context importance was attached to the activity
of the Armenian-Belarusian Intergovernmental Cooperation Commission,
where the problems and issues of cooperation will be discussed and
effectively solved.

At the end of the meeting Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan wished success
to Marina Dolgopolova in her further diplomatic mission, expressing
confidence that the relations between Armenia and Belarus will continue
successfully developing during the new Ambassador’s tenure in office.

MTS To Activate 3g Network In Armenia In 2009

MTS TO ACTIVATE 3G NETWORK IN ARMENIA IN 2009

ARKA
Aug 27, 2008

YEREVAN, August 27. /ARKA/. Armenia’s leading mobile operator
K-Telecom (under the VivaCell brand), subsidiary of the Russian
Mobile TeleSystems (MTS), plans to activate 3G (third generation)
network in Armenia in early 2009, the company has told RIA Novosti.

Yerevan, Gyumri and Vanadzor cities will be the first users of 3G
technologies in Armenia.

Last October K-Telecom was licensed to offer 3G and UMTS (Universal
Mobile Telecommunications System) services, including wide-brand
transmission.

MTS offers 3D services in Russia and Uzbekistan.

Last September MTS purchased 80% of the shares of the International
Cell Holding Ltd, the absolute shareholder of K-Telecom, and signed an
option agreement on the purchase of the rest of the company’s shares.

K-Telecom covers 66% of Armenia’s mobile communications market.

JSFC Sistema is 52.8% shareholder of MTS, the rest of 46.7% being
free float.

Georgia’s Russians Express Shame, Anger Over Moscow’s Actions

GEORGIA’S RUSSIANS EXPRESS SHAME, ANGER OVER MOSCOW’S ACTIONS
By Tara Bahrampour

Georgiandaily
/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id =6639&Itemid=65
Aug 26 2008
NY

TBILISI, Georgia — Growing up in this capital, Svetlana Tikhonova
remembers how proud her father, Petr, was of his medals. A Soviet Red
Army pilot during World War II, he used to show them off to visitors,
and on the annual holiday commemorating the end of the war, he would
march down the street with all 30 of them affixed to his chest.

But since the violent Russian conflict with Georgia, his home for
more than half his life, the 86-year-old ethnic Russian won’t leave
his room. "He says it is a shame for him to look into people’s eyes,"
Tikhonova said. "He is ashamed that his army has turned into this
group of bandits."

When the Soviet Union imploded in 1991, millions of ethnic Russians
were left in the newly independent states, outside Russia. Many
have felt a stronger allegiance to Moscow than to the country where
they wound up. The Kremlin has pushed this to its advantage in some
cases. In years of tension here, Russia supported separatist movements
and even issued Russian passports to residents of Abkhazia and South
Ossetia, two breakaway regions that have sought independence from
Georgia.

But in the rest of Georgia, and especially in Tbilisi, where
residents are proud of the city’s multiethnic composition, playing the
nationalist card hasn’t worked. Russians here feel a mix of emotions
these days, but the most salient ones seem to be shame before their
Georgian neighbors and anger that the latest conflict among politicians
could threaten their harmonious relations.

"We all love Georgia and we all feel nervous about this situation,"
said Mikhael Kazakov, 68, an ethnic Russian who was fixing a bathroom
door at the Count Alexander Nevsky Russian Orthodox Church, one of
several Russian churches in Tbilisi. "In this mutual fighting and
these mutual victims, we feel like we are losing something, and of
course we feel sad about that. In Tbilisi, we were always saying,
‘I have no nationality — I feel I am a resident of Tbilisi.’ "

Russia has long been an integral part of Georgian life. For more than
a century, Georgia was part of the czarist empire; after a brief fling
with independence from 1918 to 1921, it was swallowed by the Soviet
Union. Russian literature and language influenced Georgian culture,
and close ties with Russia offered education and work opportunities
that were unavailable here. Although Georgian remained the official
language, educated Georgians spoke Russian as fluently as their
own language.

Georgia, for its part, was a source of wine, fresh fruit, art
films, and mountain and beach vacations for the czarist and Soviet
elites. Some Russians chose to move here, charmed by the sunny climate,
and many married Georgians.

Wars and the rise of a nationalistic leader at the time of the Soviet
collapse sent many Russians back to Russia. Some also returned to
Russia to work as the economy improved. Their presence here shrank
from 6.3 percent of the population in 1989 to 1.5 percent in 2002;
today an estimated 65,000 Russians live here, according to the office
of Georgia’s ombudsman.

For the last few days, the ombudsman’s office has hosted meetings
for ethnic Russians who have come up with a petition declaring their
allegiance to Georgia and condemning the Russian occupation.

Lali Moroshkina, a journalist who arranged the meetings, said
she is worried that Russians living here may be used as political
pawns. "Russia often says they must defend their citizens in Georgia,"
she said.

She said some ethnic Russians have been quiet since the war began,
perhaps because they are afraid they won’t get Russian visas. An
estimated 1 million Georgians live and work in Russia, sending money
back to family here. This has become harder since Russia cracked down
on trade two years ago, banning Georgian wine and mineral water,
restricting travel and deporting some Georgians back to their
homeland. The bans effectively shut down the biggest market for
Georgian goods.

But the 60 or so people who attended one of the meetings were not
shy about making their feelings known.

"It’s doubly painful for me . . . because my roots, my compatriots,
are doing this," said Lyudmila Atamanova, 53, whose father, a
Russian military officer, moved to Georgia 50 years ago because of the
"special energy here." She was signing the petition, she said, because
"in the future we will be asked where we stood during this war. We
are citizens of Georgia, and I think the majority of us think this
way. It’s not nice to be objects of manipulation like what happened
in Abkhazia and South Ossetia."

Atamanova said that when she told her sister in Russia about the
bombings, she didn’t believe it. "She told me, ‘You are inventing
it.’ Now, they are silent. Maybe they are afraid to say anything."

Russians here said they had not yet heard of any backlash from
Georgians, but a few said they were worried. Matrushka, a Russian
restaurant in Tbilisi, is nearly empty these days, and Oleg Alfanesiev,
32, the manager there, said he feels a bit self-conscious.

"My neighbors say hello to me in the same way. When we watch TV and we
see these corpses, sometimes they say curses, but they’re not directed
at me." However, he said, he doesn’t let his son, a 10-year-old with
blond hair and Slavic eyes, play in the street now. "I don’t want
that someone may call my children something because they’re Russian,"
Alfanesiev said.

He may take comfort in looking at the Azerbaijanis and Armenians
here. For years, their countries have been in a cold war over a
disputed enclave, but in Tbilisi they play backgammon at teahouses
and leave politics behind.

Even in Gori, a city that suffered from heavy Russian bombardment,
Georgians standing in the shattered main square Sunday said they bore
their Russian neighbors no ill will.

"The local Russians are ashamed of those Russians who came," said
Emzar Akhalkatsi, a soccer scout, who had returned from a shelter
in Tbilisi. "There won’t be any problems for Russians; they’ve never
done anything but good here."

http://georgiandaily.com

Iran Needs Better Advocates

IRAN NEEDS BETTER ADVOCATES
By Rostam Purzal

CounterPunch
Aug 21 2008
CA

Because Iran’s leadership and the U.S. power elite each
include influential figures who press for dialog between the two
countries, we must conclude that Iran is not in danger of a military
attack. Conclusion: people of conscience should drop their opposition
to a possible U.S. or Israeli attack and instead condemn imperialism’s
best ally in the Middle East, Iran. You may laugh, but this is the
essence of Reza Fiyouzat’s hawkish argument as he struggles in a
recent Counterpunch article to sow antagonism towards Iran. Never
mind that the former government of Iraq had diplomatic and trade
relations with the U.S. and still was violently overthrown with
calamitous consequences. His assessment is the familiar one that
we have heard for decades from Iranian Monarchists, who swear that
Washington forced out the former Shah in 1979 in order to install a
pliable Islamic order in his place.

Such simplistic far left and far right analyses portray Iranians
as a nation of simpletons and victims without agency. Missing from
Fiyouzat’s neoconservative-style rush to blame the victim is any
reference to the enthusiasm of a great majority in Iran, registered
in survey after opinion survey, to restore trade and diplomatic
relations with the U.S. If Iran’s leadership is indeed eager to
welcome U.S. diplomats, investors, and tourists after nearly three
decades of estrangement, it is certainly acting with the consent
of the governed. With his rejection of detente, Fiyouzat in effect
advocates minority rule even as he demands an expanded democracy in
which Iran’s left forces would have more room to organize.

What’s more, Fiyouzat argues, mainstream pro-dialog groups, such
as the Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran
(CASMII), are aiding a Tehran-Washington conspiracy to fool and exploit
Iranians. His evidence that Iran is, behind the scenes, a partner in
crime with Yankee imperialists? Why, of course, it is Iran’s declared
but unsuccessful attempts to attract foreign investment. That is
proof enough to Fiyouzat that Iran is for sale and advocates of
Iran’s national rights, like CASMII, are sell-outs, even if their
purpose is to help expose Western double standards. According to
this sophomoric fantasy, presumably the nations of the world must
all boycott the U.S. to prove their independence! Fiouzat does not
explain why Iran should be the first. I suggest he personally set an
example by refusing to boost the U.S. war machine with his income tax.

Apparently, journalist Seymour Hersch, who regularly warns us about
ongoing U.S. efforts to destabilize Iran, is just another dupe of the
Islamic Republic, and so are the other award-winning authors Reese
Erlich and Stephen Kinzer, who each spoke in dozens of American cities
last fall and winter against a U.S. attack on Iran. The 118-nation
Non-Aligned Movement’s repeated declarations of support for Iranian
nuclear rights must similarly be delusional.

Ironically, contrary to Fiouzat’s tired claim that Iran’s leadership
uses the threat of a foreign attack as a fig leaf for legitimacy,
Iran’s Farsi-language state broadcast monopoly downplays the
possibility of U.S. or Israeli aggression. Last January, I was asked to
leave a televised show on Iran’s Channel Two (I was being interviewed
by telephone) after I refused to agree with the host that Iran was
safe from foreign attack.

Real anti-imperialists, Fiyouzat suggests with self-righteous rage,
should stand by and refuse to take U.S. and Israeli threats of
aggression seriously. He conveniently forgets that in 1953, Iran’s
communist Tudeh party hastened the overthrow of Iran’s most revered
anti-colonial campaigner ever, Mohammad Mossadegh, by withdrawing its
support. Tudeh abandoned the prime minister because, it explained,
he was too cozy with Washington. Months later the CIA overthrew
Mossadegh, ostensibly for his softness on communism! The coup
resulted in the executions of hundreds of Tudeh activists, social
democrats, and nationalists and ushered in a quarter century of
brutal dictatorship that led to the Revolution of 1978-79. The widow
of one of the perished, Mossadegh’s heroic foreign minister, Hussein
Fatemi, returned to Iran March of this year for a meeting with Iran’s
President. Afterwards she told reporters that her husband would have
been proud of Mr. Ahmadinejad’s resistance to foreign manipulations.

The centerpiece of Fiyouzat’s attempt to mobilize the progressive left
against Iran is Tehran’s participation in regime change in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Here, too, Fiyouzat is so eager to paint Iran’s decision
makers as unrepresentative that he ignores overwhelming support
for that policy among Iranians. He assures us that "Western powers
prefer an Islamic to a secular government" and "Western imperialists
cannot have it any better than the regime that exists [in Iran] now",
conveniently overlooking the considerable U.S. support for secular
elites against the popular Islamist resistance movements in Palestine
and Lebanon. Nor does Fiyouzat recognize that Iran’s alliance with
Christian Armenia and tense relations with the Shi’i-dominated Republic
of Azerbaijan is inspired by Iran’s opposition to U.S. domination in
the region.

Similarly, he makes no mention of Iran’s incessant demand, consistent
with the wishes of almost all Iraqis, that U.S. forces leave
Iraq without extracting concessions. He also fails to mention that
Iran’s closest international ally is Venezuela, hardly a U.S. client
state. All that seems to matter to him is that the Iranian government
is interested in conditional peace with Washington. Never mind that
Cuba’s anti-imperialist government is as anxious as Iran’s to have
normal trade and diplomatic relations with the U.S.

The obsession leads Fiouzat to lump defenders of Iranian sovereignty
with the "realist" wing of U.S. imperialism. It matters not to
him that advocates of Iran’s national rights against the West’s
intimidation may be motivated by other than blind support for the
current Iranian government. He is troubled that Iran has frustrated
desperate U.S. efforts to isolate it. On the fifty-fifth anniversary
of the August coup in which anti- imperialists acquiesced in the
U.S. subversion of Iranian sovereignty, Fiyouzat recommends that
the U.S. antiwar community do the same. Fortunately, only a tiny
fraction in the U.S. antiwar movement is likely to be swayed by his
short-sighted ideology.

Rostam Pourzal is a board member of the US branch of the Campaign
Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran.