Additional Authorities in Order to Combat Monopoly

ADDITIONAL AUTHORITIES IN ORDER TO COMBAT MONOPOLY

A1+
[04:59 pm] 06 October, 2006

In answer to the question of "A1+" about the raise of the costs of
imported goods in the context of fall of the US dollar in exchange,
RA Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan noted that they have turned to
the Committee Protecting Economic Competition and are waiting for their
decision after which the Government will take corresponding steps. We
turned to the Committee in order to get details about the case.

It turned out that at present the Committee is working on the
legislative amendments.

"Part of the pack of amendments refers to the necessity of giving
the Committee additional authorities in order to combat the raise of
costs. The pack of the legislative initiative will be represented
to the Government", said press secretary of the Committee Armineh
Udumyan. According to her, the present Law does not give the Committee
enough authorities in order to realize control.

Nevertheless, she noted that within the framework of its present
authorities the Committee is investigating the issue of those companies
which have monopoly in the field of the goods of mass consumption.

By the way, this year the monopolies have made reports for the
first time; according to the corresponding amendment of the law,
the monopolies are to made reports twice a year on the basis of which
the experts of the Committee assess the activity of the company and
the possible cases of abuse. The Committee made a promise to make
the results public.

Hewlett Packard Company to sign a Memo on Cooperation with RA Gov’t.

Hewlett Packard Company to sign a Memorandum on Cooperation with RA Government.

Public Radio of Armenia
Oct 6 2006

06.10.2006 17:21

In near future the Hewlett Packard Company will sign a Memorandum on
Cooperation with RA Government.

Hewlett Packard Director General for CIS countries Hilmar Lorenzo said
in Yerevan today that the Company is ready to provide recommendations
to the Government of Armenia in the spheres of electronic education
and e-governance.

Microsoft Company also intends to sign an agreement on cooperation
with the Armenian Government.

Microsoft Deputy President for Central and Eastern Asian countries
Vahe Torosyan said in Yerevan today that the document will be signed
by the end of the year and will refer to innovation activity in
different spheres.

Delay In Announcement Of Nobel In Literature

DELAY IN ANNOUNCEMENT OF NOBEL IN LITERATURE

CBC Canada
Oct 5 2006

This year’s winner of the Nobel Prize for literature will not be
announced until Oct. 12 at the earliest, Swedish Academy officials
said Thursday.

The announcement of the Nobel Laureate in Literature is often revealed
during the same week as the science prizes or in advance of those
prizes in the first week of September.

The Nobel Foundation announces a date a few days in advance to give
journalists time to travel to Sweden, but never sets a firm date for
the announcement.

A note on its website Thursday said the announcement of the literature
prize would be made "at a later date."

The Nobel Prize for Peace is to be announced next week.

Neither the process by which candidates are selected nor the names
of nominees are revealed by the Swedish-based academy, which has been
giving out the prize, named for scientist and inventor Alfred Nobel,
since 1901.

Last year’s winner of the literature prize was British playwright
Harold Pinter.

This year, speculation centres on Orhan Pamuk, the Turkish novelist
who was tried on charges of "insulting the Turkish identity" for
saying that the deaths of Armenians in 1915 was a "genocide."

The official line in Turkey is that the Armenians died at Ottoman
hands in a war situation and writers who suggest otherwise can be
prosecuted under a controversial section of the Turkish penal code.

Also suggested as possible candidates are the Syrian poet Ali Ahmad
Said, U.S. writer Philip Roth and Canadian Margaret Atwood.

Romanian President In Yerevan: No Country Should Join The EU Having

ROMANIAN PRESIDENT IN YEREVAN: NO COUNTRY SHOULD JOIN THE EU HAVING NATIONAL PROBLEM

Regnum, Russia
Oct 5 2006

Armenia is going fully to use opportunties envisaged by NATO Individual
Partnership Action Plan, which was approved in December 2005;
Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan stated during his meeting
with Romanian President Trajan Basescu in Yerevan. According to him,
Armenia is ready to consider Romanian contribution and participation
in the program’s fulfillment in such context.

In his turn, Mr. Basescu assured; being friendly country, Romania
will contribute to Armenia in all situations, assisting to it, as
far as possible, to approach to the European Union. According to the
Romanian president, no one country should join the EU, having national
problem. He reminded of problems between Romanians and Hungarians,
appeared several years ago, as a result of which, Romania was being
isolated for two years. "Europe should not reconcile itself to such
contradictions because it is multinational organization," the Romanian
president said.

As REGNUM was informed at the Armenian presidential press office,
the parties also discussed regional problems, prospects, and current
state of Armenia’s relations with neighbors, including Turkey, as
well as last developments in process of Nagorno Karabakh conflict
settlement. Trajan Basescu assured; Romania would continue to hold
neutral position on Karabakh problem.

A Number Of Non-Parliamentary Parties Of Armenia Are For Reduction O

A NUMBER OF NON-PARLIAMENTARY PARTIES OF ARMENIA ARE FOR REDUCTION OF THE 5% BARRIER TO THE ARMENIAN NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

ARMINFO News Agency, Armenia
October 5, 2006 Thursday

Leaders of a number of non-parliamentary parties of Armenia are for
reduction of the 5% barrier to the Armenian National Assembly.

Speaking at the Discussion Club "Pastark" Thursday, Leader of the
Liberal United Communist Party Vazgen Safaryan said his party is for
reduction of the barrier to 3% and for a 100% proportional system of
elections. In his turn, Leader of Democracy and Labor party Spartak
Melikyan also came out for the proportional system, as "deputies
elected through a majority system do not represent broad sections of
the population." All the political forces running for the parliament
must be represented in election commissions and the barrier must
be reduced to 3%, he said. Both the politicians believe that Venice
Commission experts who participated in the parliamentary discussions
on amendments to the Election Code "fulfill the order of the incumbent
authorities to secure their re-election."

In his turn, Leader of Marxist Party David Hakopyan known by his
eccentric statements said the acting Election Code of Armenia "was
invented in 1999 by the junta of the Union of volunteers "Yerkrapah"
Albert Bazeyan, Smbat Ayvazyan and Victor Dallakyan. It serves the
interest of the ‘bourgeois absolute’ and does not meet the public
interests. The so-called "parliamentary opposition" does not care of
this." That is why elections have turned into business. D. Hakobyan
proposed reducing the barrier to 1% and introducing compulsory
examinations for candidates on world history, Armenian history, law
and oratorical skill. The deposit must be differentiated i.e. 10% of
a deputy’s income. He also proposes fining voters for non-attendance
and limiting their political rights for 5 years. In addition, he
demands a 90/40 ratio of proportional and majority seats.

V. Safaryan and S. Melikyan said their parties may join other
ideologically close ones before the elections. While. D. Hakobyan
said his party will run for the parliament independently.

What Happens When Your Oppressors Are Next-Door Neighbors?

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOUR OPPRESSORS ARE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS?
By Kani Xulam

Kurdish Media, UK
Oct 4 2006

A story out of Kurdistan: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
Maryland, September 30, 2006 (Slightly altered versions of this
statement were also delivered at the World Affairs Councils in Santa
Rosa, Anchorage and Juneau)

I live in Washington, DC. Like most of its residents, I take the
preoccupation of my city seriously, which means follow its politics
closely. Now, Washington isn’t what it used to be, when, say,
Mr. Roosevelt first arrived at the White House as the first citizen
of the republic. Then, isolationism was the policy of choice; today,
such a course is not within the realm of possibility. For better or
worse, with the end of the Cold War, the refuge of beginning with the
religiously persecuted in Europe, later politically or economically
disenfranchised all over the globe, the place the school children
learn to call "the land of the free and the home of the brave" has,
whether one likes it or not, become the most important country in
the whole world with potential to do good as well as ill never before
seen or heard in the history of humanity. One hundred years from now,
what will the judgment of historians be about this new development?

Will they say, Washington used its awesome power for good, regulated
liberty with order, sought peace with justice, and bridged the
gap between its expressed ideals and its actual policy, or blew it
all away, squandered it badly and proved to be the proverbial bull
in the china shop that made the world an unsafe place for all its
inhabitants? An optimist by nature, I am not so sure if those who
speak on your behalf have what it takes to be the role models for our
tortured world. This evening, I want to take you to a place called
Kurdistan and show you a page out of its history. Perhaps it can offer
you a clue as to where you stand. I will be content if it helps you
conduct a better foreign policy; I will be the happiest ever if it
makes you a friend of my people’s everlasting struggle for liberty.

But first let me start with your capital. In the city on the Potomac,
the newspaper of note is the Washington Post. It measures the pulse
of the city as well as of the country and some days doesn’t even shy
away from doing the same for humanity and its turbulent journey on
our common home, the earth. I read it religiously. Have done so for
the past 13 years. Because my lapses have been few and far between,
I have a very good feel for my morning companion. I am, for example,
no longer startled by its opinion and editorial pages. It is liberal on
some issues and conservative on others. It was pro-Israel in the recent
war between Hezbollah and the Jewish state; it is pro-Chechen when
the recalcitrant nation thumbs its nose at Moscow. Darfur, thank God,
has never been without coverage in its pages. The Kurds, my people,
have had a checkered history with the Post. Some five million us,
who live in an artificial construct called the state of Iraq, have
received an okay coverage. Close to twenty million of us who live in
a dysfunctional one called Turkey have not been as fortunate.

I am a Kurd from Turkish occupied Kurdistan. I don’t have a good
relationship with my Post. Because it is an important newspaper,
because you are a critical audience, I thought perhaps I should
relate to you my dissatisfaction with it through a story about the
Kurds. It goes without saying that I would very much appreciate your
feedback. If it is negative, I will be wiser for it; if it is positive,
I will tell my supporters to take heart, their investment in me is,
to use a business term, paying healthy dividends.

I want to begin with an example of what I think is too frequently
taking place on the pages of the Post. On the last Sunday of last
month, its Outlook section printed an article, "A Father’s Ode to His
Lost Son", by David Grossman, an Israeli novelist and peace activist.

Not accustomed to reading a funeral oration in its pages, and this one
about an Israeli soldier killed in Lebanon, I found myself teary-eyed
and also puzzled. I was, to be sure, happy to see such heartfelt
prose greet me in the morning. It was better than reading the story
of a group of heartless Shiites who had murdered 14 hapless Sunnis
in Baghdad just because it was their misfortune to have Omar as their
first names. His 2000 or so words were carefully chosen, appropriately
placed, beautifully arrayed, and interspersed with more than a few
anecdotal tidbits that could only come from a close relationship of a
father with his son. After reading the piece, I felt like thanking him
for making me privy to his shattered world. I did so in spirit. But
thanking the Post never crossed my mind. To the contrary, I thought
the Post was failing its readers when it was honoring the dead of the
Jewish state, but neglecting the unseen, the obscene and the grotesque
stories of other lands. A paper aspiring to be the voice of humanity
must, even if only on occasion, make room for the dead of, why not,
Kurdistan as well. Am I wrong to assume so?

Is it not right for an American newspaper to use the principal of
proportionality in its coverage? If the Post can’t do it, who could?

Would the New York Times consider the honor?

Assuming that there might indeed be one paper out there, that might
actually want to print a Kurdish ode to a fallen Kurdish woman
or man, I took to my keyboard to compose one, just in case. It
took me several days. If you don’t mind, I would like to read it
to you. Mine is a bit longer, about 2500 words. Like Mr. Grossman,
I am a peace activist. Unlike him, and this one is an important one,
I am no novelist. There is, in other words, a small chance you will
not be disappointed with my musings. But if you are, please don’t blame
Professor Croatti, my kind host, who has absolutely nothing to do with
my failings. The children of enslaved nations are unequal, often,
to the challenges facing their peoples. "Fear", Cicero once noted,
"is of all emotions the most debilitating." Your own history provides
ample examples of it. It wasn’t Uncle Tom of Harriet Beecher Stowe
who freed the slaves; it was honest Abe. According to John Adams,
your second president, General Washington won the revolutionary
struggle not with flying colors, but through a war of attrition
that came very close to being lost to the Brits. Across the ocean,
in Europe, Poland owes its liberation to the blood of Red Army in
spite of reeling under its virtual domination for the next fifty
years. Had Allies won the Battle of Gallipoli in 1915, the greater
Kurdistan would have been a colony of Russia, and I won’t be the
first nor the last Kurd to remind this audience or our neighbors,
the Turks, the Arabs and the Persians, that such a turn of events
in history might have resulted in our freedom as well, just like it
happened with the Georgians, Armenians and Azeris in 1991.

But as fate would have it Kurdistan became the spoil of war for
the newly minted tyrannies of the Middle East: Turkey, Iran, Iraq
and Syria. It was like entrusting an orphan to four habitual child
molesters. None knew of their obligations to a subject people under
the laws of nations. All adopted policies to do away with the Kurds and
Kurdistan, once and for all. That is why many surviving Kurds, today,
are the most vociferous supporters of President Bush’s Iraq policy,
not because we want America to have colonial possessions in the Middle
East, but because the American domination, barring Kurdish freedom,
is more palatable to us than what has been our lot for the last 85
years. But there is more to this intervention than the demise of a
single tyrant who was once known as the Butcher of Baghdad. The Middle
East that was conceived in Europe is, thank God, being dismantled
one brick at a time and gravitating towards its natural parts along
linguistic and some even may say confessional lines. A couple of
things are crystal clear at least to this activist. Sleep has left
the bedrooms of local dictators and their bloodthirsty thugs; hope has
become the predominant sentiment among the disenfranchised populations,
such as the Kurds. The challenge facing my people is not the enmity
of our neighbors, that is a given, no one needs to lecture us on it,
but your own faith in democracy and whether it will have a closed
or open auction for the equivalent of 30 silver coins. As Kurds as
well as democrats of the region, we are not waiting for our friends
in the West to make up their minds or provide us with cues. We are
plodding onward to change the face of the Middle East because it is
our home and because we are the children of those who once sparked
a civilization and gave directions to the world.

Now is perhaps the best time to tell you about my own ode to a
fallen Kurd. It is about a young man who was found dead under a pile
of burning books in a place called Shemzinan, in Turkish occupied
Kurdistan. No one has been able to determine the exact time of his
death, but the day, November 11, 2005, when written in Turkish,
reads 9/11/2005, the Turks put the day before the month, and makes
an eerie comparison to what happened here five years and nineteen
days ago today. Then nineteen angry and ignorant men assaulted and
insulted a happy go lucky nation on its shores. Then thousands of your
loved ones died, some vaporized in the inferno of burning jet fuel,
some buried beneath the rubble. In the attack on Kurdistan, we know
of one turncoat Kurd who was used, the Turks are too "civilized"
to bloody their own hands, to murder the subject of my talk. In
the attack on Kurdistan, in addition to the murdered young Kurd,
hundreds of books were burned; a few were the works of Dickens,
Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, Freud and Steinbeck. I don’t know about you but
the juxtaposition of these two events, even if you just consider their
identical yet discordant dates, has brought to my mind the mournful and
immortal line of the German writer, Heinrich Heine, who once noted,
"Where they burn books, they will burn humans." For the life of me,
I cannot tell the difference between the mindsets that were behind
both events. Can you? And yet one, Al-Qaeda, is hunted the world
over, while the other, the government of Turkey, the evil system that
feels entitled to condemn an entire people to perpetual subjugation,
is hailed as a respectable member of the international community. Is
this what Goethe had in mind when he said, "Nothing is as frightening
as ignorance in action"?

The time has come for me to read you my funeral oration. As is often
the case in situations like this one, I ask for your indulgence.

Dearest Zahir,

I am paying my respects to you at Shaffer Hall on the campus of Johns
Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. It is against the law to
do so where you were born and met a violent end. 326 days separate
us from the moment of your death. I will start with those dearest
to you, your daughter — your darling, your son and the mother of
your children. All are fine. I will not say they have gotten used
to your absence; they have not. I will say this though your children
are at school, and given the circumstances, are doing as good as they
are able to. They are, to quote an expression popular with Aussies,
keeping their "chins-up", and are missing you just the same. Oh,
one other thing, since no one has come back to earth from heaven to
report, in case there is no concept of time there, your girl, your
Fatima, is eight now. She is in second grade. Your boy is seven and
started school this month.

I don’t know whether God has told you of the events surrounding your
death in Shemzinan. He seems to develop blind spots for certain peoples
from time to time. The Kurds of Kurdistan feel that way, as did the
Jews of Europe in the 1940s and the Armenians of Ottoman Empire in
the 1910s. I guess, all I am trying to say is that, there are a lot of
disappointed and angry believers down here. I know there is something
called Judgment Day, both the Bible and the Koran attest to it, and
you will get your redress for the attack on your life. But today,
I am with the students of Professor Croatti who have kindly accepted
my request to let me share with them your story and its aftermath as
an example of what it means to be a Kurd in these cruelest of cruel
times in the life of Kurdistan.

Because I know you are watching us from your room in heaven, I also
want to tell you a little bit about my audience. When Thucydides said,
"We alone regard a man who takes no interest in public affairs, not as
a harmless character; but as a useless one", he was referring to the
Athenians of his day who took to the affairs of the city-state the
way a duck takes to water. Today, he would have said the same thing
for this audience. They are the flower of this nation, the key to its
hopeful future, and most importantly for the Kurds and Kurdistan,
interested in not only expanding freedom and liberty at home, and
please pay close attention to me here, but also abroad.

Yes, Zahir, I used to say, Americans worship freedom at home and
money abroad. Not anymore. Do you really want me to tickle you with
some good news about the Kurds in America? The presidential hopeful,
Joseph Biden, openly says he is for the Kurdish freedom and in plain
English. I am praying for this Irish Catholic to become president.

Please, you do the same.

Coming back to your death, when freedom came under a merciless attack
on 9/11/2005, and I am using the Turkish way of reading the calendar
here, you were not its intended target. Seferi Yilmaz, the owner of
the Hope Bookstore, and his subversive books were. Two officers of
the Turkish military together with a Kurdish turncoat, all working
undercover, had taken it upon themselves to assassinate him in the
midst of his books going up in flames for dramatic effect. These
"romantic" killers were so sure of themselves that they had come to the
scene of crime in their own civilian car, with their own identification
cards, and you will not believe this, 361 bullets in their trunk
together with three Kalashnikovs and several lists with names of
Kurds and places too, one of them a mosque, all marked with bright
red markers, to be murdered or blown up from the face of Kurdistan!

But as "luck" would have it, fortune did not fully cooperate with
them this time. I am dying to know whether God had a role in it. Can
you please ask him when you get a chance? Although these murderers
had done their homework well, mishaps haunted them from the very
beginning. They had intended to go for the kill between the hours
of 11:00 am and 11:30 am, a quiet time in the business district,
since it coincided with the daily prayer time of the some of the
mosque-going Kurds. Mr. Yilmaz, these assassins had discovered, was not
a regular in the house of prayer and thought, correctly it turns out,
would be waiting in his shop like a sitting duck. With his death,
the authorities later revealed, they would have accomplished their
15th deed in 118 days in three neighboring districts. Who knows, their
higher ups might have then considered them for some promotions perhaps!

That morning you woke up like any other day, according to your wife.

You were in good health and only 29. Your day job was driving a taxi
and when the business was down, you visited the only bookstore in town
to fortify your mind. When I related this story to an American friend
of mine once, he was curious to know if the bookstore had a Starbucks
in it and, as you know, it didn’t. But there was something better than
the Starbucks in that store. That was the owner, Seferi Yilmaz, who had
spent fifteen years of his adult life in Turkish jails, from 23 to 38,
and seemed to know everything, and I underline the word everything,
about the books on his shelves. When you talked to him, I am just a
tad curious, did he ever bring up the stories of 420 inmates, mostly
Kurds, who were tortured to death in primarily Amed Military Prison
where he had been an inmate with some of the brightest and bravest
Kurdish activists? Like them, you had a painful end, but were clueless
that the appointed hour was approaching fast.

When it came, you were at the Hope Bookstore. I can’t get over the
fact that you lost your life in a place named after hope. Seferi, the
shopkeeper, was preparing lunch; he was making an omelet of sorts,
cooking some tomatoes with eggs in the back. He had asked you to
partake in his repast, together with your cousin, Metin Korkmaz,
who was visiting from the village of Altinsu, a Turkish name, since
the Kurdish names for villages, towns, cities, mountains, rivers and
valleys have been prohibited by law. Imagine Americans changing the
name of Baghdad, Iraq, to Crawford, America! The good folks around the
world would march in the streets, including thousands here in Baltimore
and many more in Ankara, and call it a scandalous act; and yet when
Kurdistan and its people go through a forced name-change in Turkey,
it is called "progress." If I were you, I would ask God if he still
considers his children bright! Back in the shop, as lunch was being
served, two hand grenades were thrown inside. Seferi was the first
to see them. Later, he told reporters that he had shouted, "Bombs",
"Run", and hurled himself head first out of the door.

You became history at that very moment. Your cousin saved himself with
the help of the dining table, which he had the presence of mind to
turn it into a shield. Seferi, the shopkeeper, once outside, noticed
a man running away from his shop. He followed suit. He also called
on his neighbors to do the same. They were too happy to oblige. In
97 days, their town of 14,000 had been bombed six times.

In addition to destroyed property, both Turks and Kurds had been
killed. No one had claimed responsibility for these deadly attacks.

Some dimwitted Turks up until then had blamed the Mosad, the Israeli
Intelligence Agency. Some terrorized Kurds were equally perplexed
thinking that it might even be the work of Al-Qaeda. But the killers,
the undercover agents of the Turkish military, were enjoying this
greatest spectacle of all spectacles and giving each other high-fives
for not only bewitching their sworn enemies, the Kurds, but also, the
Turks, their very flesh and blood, one of the most cursed peoples on
the face of the earth. But now a man was running away from the scene
of crime, and if caught, might shed some light on the mysterious bombs
that had been rocking not only Shemzinan, but also two neighboring
towns since July 15, 2005.

You will be glad to know that your killer was indeed caught. He proved
to be the biggest catch of all times. It was like Americans catching
Osama Bin Laden. The fact that he turned out to be a Kurdish turncoat
shamed us all including our friends all over the globe. At the time
of the chase, he had run towards a civilian car parked on the main
street. The undercover Turkish officers were waiting for him. Had they
known what was afoot; they would have, I have no doubts in my mind,
just deserted him. He was after all an expendable item, a member of
one of the most despised professions. But as he reached the backseat
of the parked vehicle, the Kurdish crowd surrounded it from all
sides. A heated argument ensued. When the word got out that you had
not survived the attack, the multitude began pelting the parked car
with rocks, kicks as well as sticks. One of the Turkish officers,
Ali Kaya, told them that he was an undercover police officer. He
even managed to get into the trunk of his car and grabbing one of
the Kalashnikovs aimed at the assembled crowd.

Now here I need to take a break, yes, a break, and dwell on the
mentality behind a so-called police officer’s decision to protect the
killer and threaten its victims. If you think this is unthinkable
in a country that goes by the name of a democracy, wait till you
hear the accolades he got from Yasar Buyukanit, the highest ranking
Turkish military officer, the Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, who,
when questioned about the blatant attack that involved his officers,
chided the reporters by saying, "I know Ali Kaya. He was my soldier.

He wouldn’t do such thing." It turns out he had. But Ferhat Sarikaya,
the Turkish prosecutor, who indicted him, was dismissed from his job.

Sabri Uzun, the head of Turkish Security and Intelligence Office, got
axed as well. He had told an investigating committee of the Turkish
parliament, "When the thief is inside the house, the lock has no use."

Mr. Uzun, to his credit, had correctly diagnosed the nature of the
crisis facing Turkey, but not its extent. It is not just one thief
that is inside the house, the place is "a den of robbers" to borrow
a colorful expressions from the Gospel of Mark, chapter 11, verse 17.

The bandits, for now, proudly go by the name of Turkish military and
run not just Turkey, but more than half of Kurdistan as well, and here
is the saddest part of my work, with the enthusiastic blessings of
the international community. Now most of the states in the world have
armies that take their orders from the elected civilians. In Turkey,
it is the other way around; the army has a state and its politicians
are its gofers. All this, unfortunately, goes to the beginning of the
Turkish experiment in state building in 1920s. It was its greatest
misfortune to be saddled not with a caring-man or a wise one, but a
monster that delighted in calling himself the father of all Turks,
Ataturk, and played with the Kurds the way a mean-spirited child
plays with his toys. When Euripides said, "Do not mistake for wisdom
the fantasies of your sick mind," I have no doubts that he had his
likes in mind.

Now if you want me to expand on this evil man’s handiwork, or of those
of his cohorts, who are now running the county as his carbon copies,
suffice it to say that it was him who said all Kurds are Turks and thus
sowed the seeds of hatred between these two unhappy peoples. Never in
the history of humanity has a fraud so big, a pretension so atrocious,
a theory so inimical to human nature, and a crime so grotesque ever
been conceived by even the greatest ignoramuses in the world. His
name will forever be remembered as a proverb of infamy, depravity,
immorality and outright stupidity. Just as by ordering a cow to be a
horse will never make the bovine a pony, so will no amount of force
or stratagem turn the Kurd into a Turk!

This inanity was what swept you away on 9/11; and it is what we must
fight now so that at least your children will be safe when they are
grown ups.

The time has come for me to put an end to this still blood-dripping
tale and say goodbye to you. I was going to part with some good news,
but there is also the bad kind. Because this is a solemn occasion,
and because these students deserve unequivocal truth, I have to tell
them, and it is with the heaviest of heavy hearts, of the latest
between Turkey and the United States. On July 5, 2006, not even nine
months after your death, the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and
the Foreign Minister of Turkey Abdullah Gul signed a "Shared Vision"
statement. It had the following choice words in its preamble: "The
relationship between Turkey and the United States is characterized
by strong bonds of friendship, alliance, mutual trust and unity of
vision. We share the same set of values and ideals in our regional
and global objectives: the promotion of peace, democracy, freedom,
and prosperity."

Regrettably, I am at a loss as how to interpret this document. It is
above my pay grade as the expression goes. What falls within it though
is to finish telling you what took place at the scene of standoff on
the main street in Shemzinan. It was initially resolved.

The Turkish officers and their Kurdish assassin were arrested. The
assembled crowd was asked to disperse. But word got out that only
your killer was imprisoned while his Turkish conspirators were
set free. It was then that a fight broke out, extending into days,
spreading to several cities both in Kurdish east and Turkish west,
between the Kurds and anything that had the word Turk in it. In the
city of your birth, the statue of Ataturk was one of the first items
to go with its head being decapitated. A few of the Turkish flags were
lowered and burned. I was in Washington, DC then and all I could think
of was the Yankee tribute to liberty in New York City, in 1776, and
how it too had resulted in the beheading of another tyrant’s statue,
this time, King George the Third.

The Kurds, I avidly read in the reports, had thrown the severed head
of Ataturk on a dumpster. The New Yorkers of 230 years ago were much
more imaginative; they had placed theirs on a stick and positioned
it by the entrance of a bar in lower Manhattan to lure in more
customers. It is, of course, with a profound sense of sadness that I,
an admirer of American Revolution, have to tell these students, the
children of Jefferson, including Dr. Rice, that they have lost their
revolutionary fervor and cannot even tell a tyrant from a freedom
fighter. The torch of freedom has definitely changed hands. We are
now vying for it, dying for it, taking up humanity’s thankless task
to lighten up the Middle East, to free the Kurds, and to proclaim to
the world Victor Hugo’s undying observation, "Nothing is more powerful
than an idea whose time has come."

WB And IFC Rank Armenia 34 In Terms Of Business Doing Ease

WB AND IFC RANK ARMENIA 34 IN TERMS OF BUSINESS DOING EASE

Armenpress
Oct 03 2006

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 3, ARMENPRESS: Armenia has been ranked 34-th out of
175 nations for its efforts to increase the ease of doing business
in the country, says a report by the World Bank and its arm, the
International Finance Corporation (IFC).

Semion Diankov, director of IFC department for monitoring analysis
and policy, said in Yerevan today that in terms of economic reforms
and actual ease of doing business index Armenia was ranked the best
among CIS member countries.

But he said the report shows that Armenia still has a lot of work to
do. Particularly, Armenia is behind the neighboring Georgia in terms
of reform implementation dynamic. Armenia started sweeping reforms
in mid 1990-s and secured the place due to progress it has made
over a decade, while studies show that Georgia was able to carry out
successful reforms in just few recent years to spring to the 37-th
position from 130-th.

The World Bank and IFC report notes that Armenia must carry out
sweeping reforms in tax collection.

Studies show that an average businessman wastes 1000 hours annually
to fill in different papers, resulting in higher volume of shadow
economic activity.

The report says also that a string of administrative obstacles makes
doing oversea trade complicated. Unlike in Georgia where registration
of documents for export-import operations takes on average 5 days,
this period in Armenia is 30-35 days.

As a result, in terms of tax payment and doing oversea business
Armenia is ranked 148 and 119 respectively, while its index of property
registration is second after New Zealand.

BAKU: If Azerbaijan Chooses War, It Will Also Release Armenians Of N

IF AZERBAIJAN CHOOSES WAR, IT WILL ALSO RELEASE ARMENIANS OF NK FROM OCCUPATION OF ARMENIAN ARMY – AZERI MP
Author: J.Shahverdiyev

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
Sept 29 2006

Azerbaijan has the right to release its occupied territories, the
Deputy Executive Secretary of ruling New Azerbaijan Party (NAP),
MP Mubariz Gurbanli told Trend, commenting on the statement of the
Armenian foreign minister Vardan Oskanyan that he made in regard with
Nagorno-Karabakh at the press-conference on September 29.

Oskanyan stated that if Azerbaijan resorts to the way of war in
the settlement of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, then Armenia will
not stay away and will ensure the security of the population of
Nagorno-Karabakh. In addition he expressed attitude towards other
questions.

Gurbanli stressed that Azerbaijani army will not combat with the
population of Nagorno-Karabakh, but with the occupant Armenian army
situated in the occupied Azerbaijani lands. "With this word, Oskanyan
wants to say that as though Armenia stands away and observes the
process. If Azerbaijan chooses the way of war, then it will also
release the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh from the occupation of
Armenian army," Gurbanli stressed.

In addition, he emphasized that irrespective of where and how Oskanyan
makes speeches, Azerbaijan has the right to liberate its occupied
territories. "We received this right from the Regulation of the United
Nations Organization. The head of our country took the priority of
resolving the conflict through a peaceful way. The war will be chosen
when the potential of the peaceful talks will come to an end. Such
situation hasn’t emerged yet. Azerbaijan wants to settle the problem
without bloodshed. But the senseless statements of Oskanyan prevent the
regulation of the conflict in a peaceful manner," Gurbanli concluded.

We Will Not Censor Our Speech

WE WILL NOT CENSOR OUR SPEECH
John Mark Reynolds [author, academic]

theOneRepublic, CA
Sept 28 2006

This story is why elaborately constructed reasons that Pope Benedict
XVI was wrong in the most recent flap with radical Islam are wrong.

Radical Islam wants no criticism of its major figures or of its
truth claims.

I do not believe that we should gratuitously insult persons others
revere. There is no place in a multi-cultural society at war for
thoughtless offense.

Contributor John Mark Reynolds

John Mark Reynolds is the founder and director of the Torrey
Honors Institute, and Associate Professor of Philosophy,
at Biola University. His personal website can be found
at and his blog can be found at

Christians live in a public square where they are happy to defend
the freedom of atheists to state their views about the divinity of
Christ. The free and open society built mostly by Christians over the
last two hundred years demands this. We respect those who disagree
enough to engage in polite and reasoned discourse.

But we will not give up our right to make reasonable, but tough
arguments against ideas we think are bad.

As usual the story is in plain type below and my comments are in
italics:

Censor comments on Islam to avoid violence: Muslim expert 20th
September 2006, 11:00 WST

As the Byzantines discovered, even becoming the servants of the
Islamic invaders did not appease radical Moslem aggression. Not all
Moslems were radical in history, but many that were not were killed
by Moslems who were.

Did the victims of 9/11 say offensive things? Did they deserve to
die for anything they had said?

Non-Muslims should practise self-censorship to avoid triggering
violent reactions, a prominent Perth Muslim says.

Why? If we do, then Muslims will have removed themselves from
the civilized nations of the world. No person should trigger a
violent reaction when he or she speaks at an academic conference on
controversial items.

The civilized world cannot practice science or any form of academic
discourse in such an environment. Just as Christians and non-Christians
can criticize the origins of the New Testament, so we must all have
the right to do textual criticism (for good or bad) of the Koran. Just
as Christian history and ethics come under (sometimes) withering fire
from academics, some even employed in Christian colleges, so Islamic
scholars must allow the same sort of free and reasoned look at their
own history and ethics to be part of the free world.

In the wake of violent attacks over a speech by Pope Benedict XVI
that linked the Prophet Mohammed’s teachings to violence, Perth
academic Samina Yasmeen said religious and community leaders should
stop speaking about Islamic icons to avoid causing offence.

No. We will never give up the right to follow the truth where it leads
us. That is the heritage of Socrates and Plato that is precious to
us and has brought such great advances to the world.

No Christian, indeed no gentleman, would condone giving needless
offense, but we will not stop saying what we believe the truth to be.

Associate Professor Yasmeen, director of the University of WA’s centre
for Muslim states and societies, accused the Pope of deliberately
provoking the aggression by inviting criticism of Mohammed.

The Holy Father did not invite criticism of Mohammed, but even if he
had that is the right of a free person living in a free society. The
Pope needless to say thinks that Islam has false beliefs. Moslem
followers have a right to those beliefs and there is much to admire
in the Islamic resistance to secularist decadence in the modern world.

But better a bit of Vegas than a society where free men cannot freely
say in a calm and rational way what they think the truth to be.

She said the Pope and other religious leaders had the same
responsibility as Islamic clerics to avoid encouraging violence
by followers.

What violence by the Pope’s followers? I deplore violence against
innocent Moslems but I know of no Christian provoked to violence by
the Pope’s speech.

Just as it is unjust to blame the victim in a crime ("She was asking
for it, coming into this neighborhood."), so it is unjust to blame
the Pope for wickedness caused by others based on a reasonable speech.

Stalin was not provoked to murder by the writings of the dissidents.

Islamic extremists need no real excuse to kill. The question is this:
will Islamic moderates defend the Pope’s right to make what they feel
is a bad speech and courageously attack the violent?

To make any moral equivalence between a speech like that of the Holy
Father and the burning of churches, the murder of a nun, and other
acts of violence is morally bankrupt.

Attack the content of the speech. Call the Pope names if you must,
but violence is the fault of the violent not of the man who gave a
paper making an argument.

Previous emotive reactions, such as the violence following the
publication of cartoons depicting Mohammed and Salman Rushdie’s 1988
novel The Satanic Verses, should have warned people not to criticise
Islam.

Do the Islamic radicals of Egypt really need an excuse to torch a
Coptic Church?

Here is the future if we do not take this War seriously: first
non-Moslems will be afraid to criticize Islam, then we will be forced
to adhere to Moslem practice to avoid offense. Outrageous tyranny
of those willing to be violent for their beliefs will force even
the majority in the West to adhere to the will of the most extreme
members of a minority unwilling to police its own.

As the Christians of the Middle East know from practice, there
are no equal rights for a religious minority in the Islamic east
today. If this Australian professor is the voice of moderate Islam,
then my critics are correct and there is no moderate Islam. This is
not neither moderate nor tolerable in a free society like Australia.

I refuse to believe my friends, Moslems of good will, would say this
thing. Let’s argue about the truth of the Pope’s speech, but give no
ground to those who loot and murder in its name.

Professor Yasmeen denied that the first reaction of many Muslims to
perceived insults was violence, despite calls by some clerics to kill
those who insult Islam and the murder of an Italian nun in Somalia.

If it is not the first reaction, then is it acceptable as a second
or third reaction? No matter how often the "provocation" violence
cannot be tolerated based on free speech.

We are war not because we do not like the views of Radical Islam or
the speeches the leaders of Radical Islam make, but because we are
defending our way of life.

This article in which an academic, paid by the West to teach our
children is the best example of our tolerance. This Moslem scholar
has the right to her views. . . we should publish them . . . and
argue against them, but we must not allow them to silence us.

Right now, this very night, seminary faculty all over America in
places like Harvard defame my beliefs. I lose no sleep over it and
I contemplate no violence even though such an assault on my view of
my precious Lord has gone on for decades.

"I am not supportive of people killing and blowing things up, but
people need to start looking at self censorship," she said.

If only that would end the murder, but the Christian Armenians know
it would not because they were a defeated minority and the radicals
killed them anyway.

They were silent and they died in the hundreds of thousands and the
Turkish government still will not admit they were murdered.

Professor Yasmeen said aggressive reactions were mainly limited to
countries with low literacy rates and limited understanding of global
politics, where Mohammed was seen to be the most important figure in
a person’s life.

Do Christians kill as Moslem newspapers print defaming articles about
Christianity and the Holy Father? Even in countries with low literacy
rates? Would this Professor rather hold an Islamic cartoon about the
Pope in a low literacy rate Catholic nation or be a Christian with
the Pope’s academic address in hand in any Islamic state?

The Pope’s apology and explanation would have had little impact,
she said.

Why? Does Islam seek dialogue or only silent serfdom on the part of
Christians and Jews? Can we evangelize Moslems? I would give her the
chance to make her best case for Islam, if I can do the same safely
in a similar size Islamic university. But then, if my students convert
to Islam, their parents will be very sad, but if most Moslems convert
to Christianity, they must fear for their very lives in the Moslem
controlled world.

umns/ReynoldsJ/20060927ReynoldsCensor.html

http://www.theonerepublic.com/archives/Col
www.johnmarkreynolds.com
www.johnmarkreynolds.info.

Textes sur =?unknown?q?l=27Arm=E9nie_et?= les intermittents dans la

Agence France Presse
27 septembre 2006 mercredi 5:41 PM GMT

Textes sur l’Arménie et les intermittents dans la "niche" PS le 12 octobre

PARIS 27 sept 2006

Le groupe socialiste à l’Assemblée nationale a annoncé mercredi qu’il
consacrerait sa "niche" (séance d’initiative parlementaire) du 12
octobre à l’examen d’une proposition de loi sur le génocide arménien
et d’une autre sur le statut des intermittents du spectacle.

Examinée le 18 mai 2006, la proposition de loi PS réprimant la
négation du génocide arménien de 1915, n’avait pas pu être soumise au
vote, dans le temps imparti au débat, en raison d’une bataille de
procédure.

La proposition de loi, qui divise les groupes politiques au-delà du
clivage droite-gauche et avait provoqué la colère de la Turquie, vise
à compléter par un volet pénal la loi du 29 janvier 2001 par laquelle
la France reconnaît le génocide arménien.

Elle fait de la négation du génocide un délit punissable d’un an
d’emprisonnement et de 45.000 euros d’amende.

La proposition sur les intermittents vise à trouver une solution à
propos de leur régime. Depuis 2003, les intermittents du spectacle
protestent contre le durcissement des conditions d’accès à leur
régime spécifique d’assurance chômage.

Ils rejettent le nouveau protocole négocié le 18 avril dernier,
qu’aucun syndicat n’a ratifié depuis.