Matthew Bryza to Visit Stepanakert Tomorrow

PanARMENIAN.Net
Matthew Bryza to Visit Stepanakert Tomorrow
28.07.2006 13:28 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Mr Matthew Bryza, the U.S. Co-chair of the OSCE
Minsk Group for the Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement, will pay a
visit to Stepanakert July 29. The U.S. mediator is scheduled to meet
with NKR President Arkady Ghukasian July 30, then he will return to
Yerevan, reported the press office of the NKR leader.
It should be noted that it’s Bryza’s first visit to the region. Let us
also remind that NKR parliament speaker Ashot Ghulian and Foreign
Minister Georgy Pertosian met with Mr Bryza June 26, 2006 and reached
agreement on continuing consultations in Yerevan, Stepanakert and
Baku.

Armenia Striding Confidently towards Eurointegration and Cooperation

PanARMENIAN.Net
Armenia Striding Confidently towards Eurointegration
and Cooperation with NATO
28.07.2006 13:19 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ `European integration: Ways of formation of unified
and peaceful neighborhood’ international conference started in
Yerevan. The purpose of the conference is to represent the European
values, principles and obligations as guarantees of security and
partnership as well as to discuss the current situation and further
cooperation. Representatives of Armenia, Bulgaria, Georgia, Moldova,
Russia, Romania, Ukraine, Turkey, the EU, NATO, OSCE and CoE are
taking part in the conference.
According to NATO Liaison Officer for the South Caucasus Romualdas
Razuks, NATO’s target in the South Caucasus is the unification of
efforts by international organizations for ensuring security and
stability in the region and development of economic ties. `Armenia is
confidently striding towards the European integration and cooperation
with NATO. `Armenia has already chosen the European path and we
welcome her moves in this direction,’ he said.

Georgian authorities to allow Armenian citizens pass the border

From: [email protected]
Subject: Georgian authorities to allow Armenian citizens pass the border
Georgian authorities to allow Armenian citizens pass the border through
Egnet checkpoint

ArmRadio.am
28.07.2006 17:55
In response to the question about the situation with the Armenian
citizens gathered at the Ergnet border crossing point in Georgia,
Mr. Karapetyan stated: `We were informed tonight that the Georgian
authorities have decided as an exception to allow the citizens of
Armenia to pass the border crossing point near Egnet. We would like to
reiterate our gratitude for this step taken by a good neighbor.
During the coming hours, a string of cars accompanied by the
representatives of the Armenian Embassy in Tbilisi and the OSCE Office
in Georgia will be headed for Armenia. I take this opportunity to
once again appeal to those citizens of the Republic of Armenia who
travel from Russia to Armenia via Georgia not to take the road passing
through South Ossetia, Georgia. The South Ossetia administrative
border crossing point is not functioning. The only possible way to
reach Armenia from Russia today is by means of the Poti ` Novorossiysk
ferry.

Property For Tax May Be Reconsidered

PROPERTY FOR TAX MAY BE RECONSIDERED
Lragir.am
27 July 06
The former Russian co-chair of the Russian-Armenian intergovernmental
committee can sleep quietly to promote the Russian-Armenian strategic
partnership. Klebanov was the person who participated in the
implementation of the deal Property for Debt. There is information
that the Russian authorities are likely to audit the companies that
were transferred to Russia in return for the debt. This idea occurred
a year and a half ago, however it was definitely frozen. The Lragir has
learned that the idea of auditing Property for Debt is again generated
among the Russian authorities. In this context there is other important
information that some Russian government officials, including officials
of the defense ministry, who were informally engaged in bringing into
being the deal of Property for Debt, were dismissed.

IAC: A320 crash caused by inadequate actions of the captain

IAC: A320 crash caused by inadequate actions of the captain
Regnum, Russia
July 27, 2006
The Chief Department of Civil Aviation of Armenia has received the
official findings of the Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC) concerning
the crash of the Armenian Airbus A320 plane that fell into the Black
Sea while flying from Yerevan to Sochi on May 3. The press service
of the Department has informed REGNUM of the content of the findings:
“The investigation has shown:
With autopilot turned on, the plane was gliding strictly within
the landing configuration and was already 300 meters high when
the air controller instructed the crew to stop landing because
of low clouds, and to make a climbing turn. When turning, the
captain turned off the autopilot and, after climbing for a while,
with improper bank and pitch attitude, began to land the aircraft –
thereby, acting inadequately. Meanwhile, the second pilot failed to
properly control the landing parameters (pitch, altitude, vertical
speed). When the terrain warning system went off, the crew’s actions
were poorly coordinated and insufficient for pulling the plane up. No
single system failed, the aircraft adequately reacted to both the
instructions of the autopilot and the actions of the crew. There was
enough fuel for safe landing.”
The investigation was carried out by the IAC, a group comprising
representatives of Russian Transport Control Service, Russian Aviation
Department, Russian Air Navigation Department, the Armenian air
authorities and experts from France (the A320 manufacturer-country)
in compliance with the ICAO standards, the Intergovernmental
Agreement of 12 regional states (including Russia and Armenia)
and the air accident investigation rules. During the investigation
the commissioners collected and examined all relevant data on the
aircraft, the crew and the services controlling the flight, decoded
and analyzed the data of the black boxes and the land air control
services. With the help of special stands and trainers, a group of
Russian, Armenian and French specialists simulated the whole flight,
including the actions of the pilots.
To remind, the A320 fell into the Black Sea near Sochi, 6 km away
from the shore, on May 3, 2006 02:13 AM. All the 8 crew members and
105 passengers onboard were killed.

Iran bans Da Vinci Code book after 8 editions

Iran bans Da Vinci Code book after 8 editions
CBC Canada
June 26 2006
Iran has stopped publication of the bestselling novel The Da Vinci
Code after protests about the book from three Christian clerics.
The Persian translation of Dan Brown’s thriller is in its eighth
edition in Iran, and books already on the market will not be removed
from shelves.
But Iran’s culture ministry announced Wednesday that it would not
allow another edition to be published.
“Based on the request of three Christian clerics, yesterday we decided
to ban its republication,” said an official at the Ministry of Culture
and Islamic Guidance, according to Reuters.
Iranian Christians, numbering about 100,000, are a small minority in
a country of 69 million Muslims.
However, there are two seats in Iran’s parliament for the mainly
Christian Armenian community and one for the tiny Assyrian Christian
community.
Christian groups around the world have objected to The Da Vinci Code,
because it suggests that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and the
couple had a child, whose bloodlines survive to this day.
The book, first published in 2003, has sold more than 60 million
copies worldwide and been made into a film starring Tom Hanks.
The film has not been permitted into Iran, but is available in
pirated DVDs.
Egypt, Pakistan and some states in India have also banned The Da
Vinci Code.

9 Representatives of Armenia Included in Commissions of European Box

9 REPRESENTATIVES OF ARMENIA INCLUDED IN COMMISSIONS OF EUROPEAN BOXING UNION
YEREVAN, JULY 25, NOYAN TAPAN. The sitting of the European Boxing
Union (EBU) Executive Committee took place on July 24. Thanks to
organizations Vice-Chairman Derenik Gabrielian for the first time a
great number, 9, Armenians were included in the acting commissions. And
D.Gabrielian also became First Deputy Chairman of the Commission
of Judges.

ZNet: Lebanon between Truth and Justice

ZNet | Israel/Palestine
Lebanon between Truth and Justice
by Khatchig Mouradian; July 24, 2006
I’m for truth, no matter who tells it.
I’m for justice, no matter who it’s for or against.
Malcolm X
On July 12 2006, fighters from the armed wing of the Lebanese political
party Hizbollah launched a cross-border attack on Israel killing and
injuring a number of Israeli soldiers and capturing two. The operation was
dubbed `True Promise’; months ago, Hizbollah had promised in public to
capture Israeli soldiers to exchange them with Lebanese prisoners
languishing in Israeli jails, some for more than 25 years.
The very day the soldiers were captured, Sayyed Hassan Nasralla, the
secretary-general of Hizbollah, declared that there was no intention on his
part to start a full-scale confrontation, and that the only way to free the
Israeli soldiers was through indirect negotiations leading to an exchange.
Israel, however, immediately launched a wide-scale military campaign, dubbed
`Just Reward,’ to free the two soldiers. Hizbollah first retaliated by
shelling military positions in Israel’s north and, eventually, as the
Israeli Army started bombing Lebanese infrastructure and targeting
civilians, Hizbollah started shelling civilian targets as well.
Israel has thus far `justly rewarded’ the three runways and fuel depots of
Beirut International Airport, all its seaports, most highways and roads
connecting various parts of the country as well as those leading to Syria,
tens of bridges in Lebanon’s south and east, factories, trucks, ambulances,
TV transmission installations, thousands of buildings and houses. More than
360 civilians have been, again, `justly rewarded’ by getting slaughtered,
and more than a thousand received lesser `rewards’ by being sent to
hospitals and some 700 thousand (an estimated 15 percent of the country’s
population) have been `rewarded’ with refugee status. President Bush said
that Israel had the right to defend itself and, to date, the US has blocked
all attempts by the international community to put a ceasefire in place.
Hizbollah, in turn, has tried to impose what the Arab media and experts are
calling a `balance of terror’ by bombing northern Israel –most notably the
port city of Haifa– and causing a number of deaths and injuries among
Israeli soldiers and civilians.
While United Nations relief coordinator Jan Egeland was saying that Lebanon
was suffering a `major’ humanitarian crisis and that Israel was violating
`international humanitarian law,’ the US Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice, heading to the region on July 23, did not seem to be in a rush. `We
have to be certain that we are pushing forward to the new Middle East, not
going back to the old one,’ she said.
What started as an operation to liberate the 2 Israeli soldiers (if one is
naïve enough to believe that) is now a US supported war to forge a `new
Middle East.’ If this renovation is anything in the same breath as the
`Greater Middle-East’ plans that are being implemented from Afghanistan to
Iraq to the Palestinian territories, then Lebanon has just started to walk
down the long road that the Bush administration sees as that of freedom,
democracy, and security, and, if the country is lucky enough, three years
from now, it will be as free, democratic and safe as, say, Iraq and
Afghanistan are today.
What needs to be done? Attempts to wipe out, or even defeat Hizbollah, are
in all probability doomed to fail. With the degree of `pinpoint accuracy’
the Israeli army is displaying, the entire Lebanese people will be cleansed
much before the rooting out of Hizbollah.
Implementing UN Security Council resolution 1559 and disarming Hizbollah by
force are doomed to fail as well. Whether the US administration, the West in
general, some `moderate’ Arab states, and even many in Lebanon like it or
not, Hizbollah has a broad grassroots support not only among the Shiites,
the largest minority in Lebanon, but also among some Christian, Druze, and
Sunni Muslim political circles, who are extremely angry at Washington’s
overall pro-Israeli bias, and at the fact that the Bush administration is
ignoring the UN Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, which were
declared to be at the core of the international initiative launched in
Madrid in 1991.
Any initiative to solve the immediate crisis in Lebanon must involve an
exchange of prisoners between Lebanon and Israel (and probably in the
Palestinian territories as well), Israel’s handing down of the maps of
landmines that the Israeli army had planted in southern Lebanon before its
withdrawal in 2000, and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Shebaa farms–
which, according to the Lebanese government and Hizbollah, is Lebanese soil.
Even after all that, it is an illusion to believe that a comprehensive and
lasting solution can be achieved without finding a true and just solution to
the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Khatchig Mouradian is a Lebanese-Armenian writer, translator, and
journalist. He is an editor of the daily newspaper Aztag, published in
Beirut. He can be contacted at [email protected]

A few lessons of the Lebanon crisis in the context of Karabagh

A few lessons of the Lebanon crisis in the context of Karabagh
Yerkir.am
July 21, 2006
By Gayane Movsessian
The tragic developments in Lebanon obviously show the helplessness
of international organizations and the international community in
general in countering global crises including those that arise in
the course of regional conflicts.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union a situation emerged whereby
international mechanisms were distorted and no new system had been
formed. In this situation a number of regional conflicts reached a
deadlock, as experts note. This does not refer only to the Middle
East. It refers to Iraq, Iran, China and a number of other countries.
There are varying opinions as to who is to blame for the war
in Lebanon. And no one knows what to do about it. Therefore,
the statements made by the international community are rather
declarative. The aggravation of the situation in the Middle East showed
to what attempts of distorting solution of conflicts and unbalanced
approach to such solutions can lead.
Particularly, Israel’s unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in
2005 and from the Southern territories of Lebanon in 2000 did not
lead to the settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict but to a new
phase in the confrontation, which as experts estimate, can push back
the situation in the Middle East for twenty years.
When observing the developments in the Middle East one cannot help
drawing parallels with the Karabagh conflict, more specifically, with
the scheme of the settlement recently publicized by the international
mediators.
The situation in Lebanon confirms our repeatedly voiced concern over
the proposal of withdrawal of Armenian troops from the territories
adjacent to Nagorno Karabagh and postponement of determination of
Nagorno Karabagh’s legal status.
The mediators do not want to see these concerns and are again trying
to distort the settlement process. The leaders of 9 countries stressed
the necessity of “speedy agreement over the main principles of peaceful
settlement of the Karabagh conflict this year”. They called on Armenia
and Azerbaijan to exert political will to reach an agreement and
prepare their peoples for peace rather than for war.
This has been repeated for many times over many years. What is
the result? Are the people in Azerbaijan being prepared for
peace? Meanwhile, the governments in Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh
Republic consistently convince their populations of the necessity for
a compromise. It should be noted that we are talking about mutual
compromise. However, no one wants to notice this difference in the
behavior of Yerevan and Baku.
The mediators prefer to stick to the balanced approach: in any
situation both sides are either right or wrong. In such a situation,
why would the Armenian public trust the fair approach of the
international mediators and the possibility of implementation of a
peace agreement? The public in Karabagh cannot even be mentioned since
the three “co-judges” of the OSCE Minsk Group seem to have completely
forgotten about one of the true and internationally recognized sides
of the conflict – Nagorno Karabagh.
Meanwhile, it was Karabagh that suffered most because of Azerbaijan’s
aggression in 1991-1994. It is Karabagh that is the least interested
in restarting the war as opposed to Azerbaijan.
It is Karabagh that is ready to support any of the mediators’
initiatives aimed at consolidation of the ceasefire regime and
conflict settlement. ” Nagorno Karabagh has always supported the
peaceful settlement of the conflict and is ready to exert all efforts
to reach an arrangement for sustainable peace in the region.
Unfortunately, not everything depends on the mediators. Taking into
consideration Azerbaijan’s destructive position that denies any contact
with Nagorno Karabagh, an acceptable and fair settlement seems to
be very hard to achieve. The President of the Russian Federation
correctly pointed out that Russia is not planning to impose any
settlement on the conflicting sides and that compromise should be
achieved by the peoples.
Taking into consideration the Russian Federation’s readiness to be a
guarantor for the implementation of the reached agreement we would
like to remind once again that only with participation of legally
elected authorities of Nagorno Karabagh Republic, the main party
of the conflict that suffered most, is achievement of a settlement
related to the future of our people possible,” Foreign Minister of
Nagorno Karabagh Republic Georgi Petrossian stated commenting on the
statement made by G-9 leaders.
Azerbaijan was alerted by the statement of the G-9 leaders stressing
the importance of preparing peoples for peace rather than for war. “If
the statements that other solutions to the conflict are possible are
referred to by this call, it is necessary to take into consideration
the peculiarities of Azerbaijan’s situation.
We are not in a position to afford conducting negotiations for the sake
of it,” Head of the Information Department of Azerbaijan’s Foreign
Ministry Tair Tagizade stated. Having rejected any settlement based
on mutual consensus Baku is still hoping to get everything with the
assistance of the mediators.
Azerbaijan’s hopes lie with the new American Co-Chair Mathew Bryza. The
latter, according to the Azeri Foreign Minister Elmar Mamedyarov,
is planning to visit Yerevan and Baku on July 31 – August 1 with the
purpose to discuss ” some new elements” of the Karabagh settlement.
According to Mamedyarov, if the Azeri side sees an opportunity for
progress in Bryza’s proposals it might agree for a meeting of the
Armenian and Azeri foreign ministers.
Meanwhile, the Armenian President Robert Kocharian and his Azeri
counterpart Ilham Aliyev will have an opportunity to meet the Russian
President Vladimir Putin in the framework of the informal CIS summit.
One can hardly expect that Russia will come up with any new initiatives
on Karabagh settlement during this meeting. However, we believe that
the Russian president sends some messages to the Armenian and Azeri
presidents, messages that are not intended for publicity.
The problem is that Azerbaijan’s denial of Nagorno Karabagh’s right for
self-determination as well as the continuing anti-Armenian propaganda
make it impossible to for such meetings and messages to achieve any
progress in the settlement process.

Armenia Interested in Strengthening State Ties with Iran

Armenia Interested in Strengthening State Ties with Iran
PanARMENIAN.Net
21.07.2006 15:24 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ No relations can substitute for the Armenian-Iranian
ones and Armenia is interested in further strengthening state ties with
Iran, Head of Hay Dat Office, ARF Dashnaktsutyun Bureau Responsible
for Foreign Policy Affairs Kiro Manoyan stated in Yerevan. In his
words, Armenia has diplomatic relations in the region only with Iran
and Georgia, which is also a friendly state.
“Armenia’s relations with those two countries should be arranged
to a degree to replace the absence of relations with Azerbaijan and
Turkey. If the international community applies sanctions against Iran,
Armenia will not support these,” the ARF Dashnaktsutyun representative
said.