NYT: Turkish Laureate Criticizes French Legislation

Turkish Laureate Criticizes French Legislation

By SEBNEM ARSU
Published: October 14, 2006
ISTANBUL, Oct. 13 – Orhan Pamuk, the Turkish novelist who won the
Nobel Prize in Literature this week, went on television Friday to
criticize the French parliamentary vote that would make it a crime to
deny that the Ottoman Turks’ mass killing of Armenians constituted
genocide.
In a telephone interview broadcast live on the private television
network NTV, Mr. Pamuk, who faced criminal charges for his statements
acknowledging the massacre, said France had acted against its own
fundamental principles of freedom of expression.
`The French tradition of critical thinking influenced and taught me a
lot,’ he said. `This decision, however, is a prohibition and didn’t
suit the libertarian nature of the French tradition.’ The legislation
was approved by the lower house of Parliament, but it is uncertain
whether the upper house will concur.
In any case, Mr. Pamuk urged his compatriots not to let their
frustration with France get out of hand. He used a Turkish proverb to
get his point across. Roughly translated, it means `Don’t set the
blanket on fire for a flea.’
Some analysts fear that widespread anger against the French
legislation may turn more Turks against joining the European Union. A
Turkish opinion poll released in July showed a decline in support, to
58 percent from a high of 74 percent in 2003, in part because of the
prolonged road to admission.
Mr. Pamuk’s statement came after some in the country voiced suspicions
that the award was politically motivated. Mr. Pamuk owes part of his
celebrity in Europe to his criticism of Turkey’s stance on the
Armenian genocide. Many in Europe feel that Turkey should acknowledge
that the mass killings during and after World War I were genocide, and
the country’s refusal may complicate its attempts to join the European
Union.
Some of Mr. Pamuk’s supporters called it unfortunate that the prize
was awarded on the same day as the French parliamentary vote. They
fear that Turks will see the two events as more evidence that Europe
is treating their country unfairly.
Bulent Arinc, the speaker of the Turkish Parliament, challenged
Mr. Pamuk on Friday to tell the world what he thought about the French
legislation, which Mr. Arinc said `massacres freedom of expression.’
Mr. Pamuk was charged last year with making `anti-Turkish’ remarks
when he called attention to the Armenian genocide during an interview
with a Swiss magazine. Turkish nationalists initiated the criminal
case using a law that makes it a crime to insult Turkish
identity. Europeans and others who decried Mr. Pamuk’s treatment said
Turkey was violating his freedom of expression. After much outside
pressure, the charges were dropped on a technicality.
While the French legislation drew mostly negative reaction here,
Mr. Pamuk’s award inspired praise as well as criticism. Newspaper
writers and some other authors showered him with praise. But others
were more critical.
An arts critic, Ozdemir Ince, implied that Mr. Pamuk had won only
because he presented the view of Turkish history that many Europeans
wanted to hear. `Pamuk, who is given the Nobel Prize, accepts the
Armenian genocide,’ Mr. Ince said. `Turkey has been put on sale, and
Turkish history has been sold in an auction at the lowest price.’
Alev Alatli, a novelist, criticized Mr. Pamuk during an interview on
NTV.
`One of the most powerful institutions of the diaspora Armenians is in
Sweden, and they are very powerful there,’ she said. `Can you imagine
that one could have been even nominated without being in good terms
with these circles?’
Sema Munuklu, 38, a restaurant owner, said: `I don’t think that he
didn’t deserve it. After all, he is a great writer. But I can’t help
thinking that things he said might have been an influence on the
prize.’
Ms. Munuklu said the French Parliament’s action displayed European
hesitancy in accepting Turkey into the European Union.
Ibrahim Unseli, 55, who runs an electronics shop, said he was as
appalled by the French Parliament’s attitude as he was by Mr. Pamuk’s
position on the Armenians and added that he hoped that Turks would
boycott French goods

Beirut: Armenians protest Turkish UNIFIL role

The Daily Star, Lebanon
Oct 13 2006
Armenians protest Turkish UNIFIL role
Demonstrators point to world war I-era massacres
By Iman Azzi
Daily Star staff
Friday, October 13, 2006
BEIRUT: The red, orange and blue stripes of the Armenian flag
fluttered beside the cedar of Lebanon Thursday as thousands of
Lebanese citizens of Armenian descent protested Turkey’s planned
participation in the UN peacekeeping forces patrolling South Lebanon.
“We, the Armenian community, are against the deployment of Turkish
troops in South Lebanon, because of their history as a violent
state,” explained Hagop Havatian, spokesman for the ARF Tashnak
Party, the youth party responsible for coordinating Thursday’s
demonstration. “Last week we sent letters to every member of the
Lebanese Parliament asking them to reconsider this issue. We also
sent a letter to [UN Secretary General] Kofi Annan but until now,
these has been no reply.”
Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their ancestors were slaughtered
in orchestrated killings by Ottoman Turks during World War I, in an
act they maintain can only be seen as genocide. The rally took place
at Beirut’s Martyrs Square, which honors six Lebanese nationalists
who were hanged by the Ottomans during the war.
It was the third such protest organized by the Lebanese-Armenian
community, which is said to number over 200,000. The rally drew a
larger crowd than previous rallies held in front of UN House in
Beirut and in Bourj Hammoud.
“We will continue our refusal in democratic ways,” Havatian added.
“This act ignores one of the biggest groups in Lebanon. We are hurt
and feel humiliated and hope the Lebanese government will reconsider
this issue and our feelings.”
Razmig Karayan was attending the protest with his girlfriend. “I am
here against the Turks,” he said. “I don’t trust them. They are
friends with Israel … They can’t be depended on to work for peace.”
A statement circulated at the protest read: “Any participant force in
the UNIFIL should be welcomed by the whole Lebanese society …
Turkey continues to lead a hostile foreign policy in the region,
especially with its immediate neighbors and still occupies northern
Cyprus, continues to blockade Armenia, and refuses to recognize and
apologize for the 1915 Armenian genocide it has perpetrated.”
Hundreds of students at Armenian private schools attended the rally
instead of class, some still sporting school uniforms. The protest
grew into a diverse crowd, from babies in strollers to older women
carrying walking sticks and teenagers sporting Armenian flags painted
on their cheeks.

Narine Bouljhourdjian left a class at the American University of
Beirut early to join the protest. She brought a friend on vacation
from Canada, who also was of Armenian descent.
“I believe that Turkey does not have the right to work for peace, not
with their history. Peace and Turkey just don’t correlate,” she said.
Behind the two girls, a protester held a sign: “Placing Turkish
troops in Southern Lebanon is an insult to the collective memory of
Lebanon.”
Another placard read: “Murderers cannot be peacekeepers.”
In total, Turkey is to deploy some 700 soldiers and civil engineers
in Lebanon. Those who landed on Tuesday were the first Muslim
peacekeepers to arrive in the country.
Turkey held a sending-off ceremony Thursday for nearly 260 soldiers
and civil engineers scheduled to depart for the Southern port city
of Tyre on October 19 and are expected to help rebuild damaged
bridges and roads.
Earlier Thursday, French MPs approved a bill making it a crime to
deny that the 1915-1917 massacres of Armenians was genocide,
provoking the fury of the Turkish government. The bill still requires
approval by the French Senate and president Jacques Chirac, neither
of which is expected, to become law.
“What France has done is very good. The Lebanese government should do
the same instead of welcoming Turkish troops,” said an elderly
demonstrator who gave his name as Taurus. The Lebanese Parliament
recognized the Armenian genocide in May 2000.
Overriding widespread opposition, the Turkish Parliament approved a
government motion on September 5 to join the United Nations Interim
Force in Lebanon. Turkish peacekeeping troops have also served in
Bosnia and Kosovo and have led international operations in Somalia
and Afghanistan. – With agencies

S. Caucasus Mirror Image of Balkans, Armenia, Bulgaria Key States

PanARMENIAN.Net
South Caucasus Mirror Image of Balkans while Armenia
and Bulgaria Are Key States
13.10.2006 14:35 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The South Caucasus is a mirror image of Balkans
while Bulgaria and Armenia are the key states of these regions,
Bulgarian Ambassador to Armenia Stefan Dimitrov said in an interview
with PanARMENIAN.Net. In his words, the Europe’s border goes along the
South Caucasus. `We want the stability and security zone to extend. In
my opinion, Turkey’s possible EU membership will inevitably raise the
Armenian issue. From this standpoint I am glad to witness the
consistent development of the European Neighborhood Policy in Armenia
and the other South Caucasian states. This policy will yield good
fruit in some 10-15 years,’ he said. Stefan Dimitrov voiced assurance
that after the signing of the Action Plan `we should all consider a
new European image of Armenia.’ `We also prepare an interparliamentary
protocol on cooperation. At that I should mention that its
implementation will not depend on the outcomes of elections in either
of the states. The project provides for cooperation on a permanent
institutional basis. The whole negotiation base will be adapted in
view of Bulgaria’s joining the European Union. Our state is obliged to
do this while the adaptation of bilateral agreements is a useful
necessity for Armenia as well within the context of her own European
integration policy, the Ambassador said.

The Nobel Prize 2006

THE NOBEL PRIZE 2006
SR International – Radio Sweden, Sweden
Oct 12 2006
The 2006 Nobel Prizes were announced in Stockholm starting with the
Medicine prize, on the 2nd of October.
The Nobel Prizes are announced out over two week period in Sweden
and Norway.
The prize-awarding institutions are scientific and literary bodies
in Sweden, and a committee elected by the Norwegian Parliament to
choose the peace laureate.
The Swedish institutions invite nominations from past laureates
and selected university professors. For the peace prize, members of
governments and parliaments worldwide can also make nominations.
The Awards
All awards are always presented on the 10th of December, the
anniversary of the death in 1896 of Alfred Nobel, theSwedish
industrialist who set up and financed the prizes.
Occasionally no winner is announced.
The identities of the winners are announced simultaneously, with
citations explaining the choice, at a news conference in the Swedish
capital and by couriers sent to the Stockholm offices of international
news agencies.
The peace prize is announced and awarded in Oslo, the Norwegian
capital. Alfred Nobel designated that the Peace Prize be awarded in
Norway which at the time was joined to Sweden in a political union.
Nobel Committee members almost never discuss their choices in public,
and runners-up aren’t revealed for 50 years.
Each Award is 10 million Swedish kronor, or some $1.4 million US
dollars, plus a diploma, and gold medal. Laureates and their families
are invited to gala ceremonies in Stockholm and Oslo which are followed
by lavish banquets with Scandinavian royalty.
2006 Nobel Medicine Prize
Americans Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello won the Nobel medicine
prize for discovering a method of turning off selected genes,
an important research tool that scientists hope will lead to new
treatments for HIV, cancer and other illnesses.
The Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm honoured the pair for their
relatively recent discovery of RNA interference, which it called “a
fundamental mechanism for controlling the flow of genetic information.”
Fire’s and Mello’s findings, published in 1998, opened a new field
of research that has helped researchers break down, or silence,
specific genes to help neutralize harmful viruses and mutations. RNA
interference occurs in plants, animals, and humans. It is already
being widely used in basic science as a method to study the function
of genes and it may lead to novel therapies in the future. AIDS
researchers hope RNA interference can help them develop new drugs to
fight viruses such as HIV.
“It looks very encouraging today, but it’s too early to say whether it
will find an important place in the therapeutic arsenal” against HIV,
said Goran Hansson, chairman of the prize committee.
Erna Moller, a member of the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska, said RNA
interference has already had a dramatic effect on the pharmaceutical
and biotech industries.
RNA, or ribonucleic acid, is a biomolecule that can store and
transmit genetic information, similar to the role of DNA. In 1989,
Americans Sidney Altman and Thomas Cech were awarded the Nobel Prize
in chemistry for discovering RNA’s catalytic properties.
Fire, 47, of Stanford University, and Mello, 45, of the University
of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, published their seminal
work in the journal Nature in 1998. The two men will share the prize,
including 10 million kronor ($1.4 US dollar million).
The Nobel committees typically honour discoveries that have been
tested over decades, but Hansson said the findings by Fire and Mello
had a big impact even though they were published just eight years ago.
Last year’s medicine prize went to Australians Barry J. Marshall and
Robin Warren for discovering that bacteria, not stress, causes ulcers.
2006 Nobel Physics Prize
Americans John C. Mather and George F. Smoot won the 2006 Nobel Prize
in physics for work that helped cement the big-bang theory of how
the universe was created and deepen understanding of the origin of
galaxies and stars.
The scientists shared the prestigious 10 million kronor ($1.4 million
US dollar) award for discovering the nature of “blackbody radiation”
– cosmic background radiation believed to stem from the big bang –
the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm said.
Mather, 60, and Smoot, 61, based their work on measurements done with
the help of the NASA-launched Cosmic Background Explorer satellite
in 1989. They were able to observe the universe in its early stages
about 380,000 years after it was born. Ripples in the light they
detected also helped demonstrate how galaxies came together over time.
“It is one of the greatest discoveries of the century. I would call
it the greatest. It increases our knowledge of our place in the
universe.” Per Carlson, chairman of the Nobel committee for physics.
Mather, works at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt,
Maryland, and Smoot works at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
in Berkeley, California. Mather said he and Smoot did not realize
how important their work was at the time of their discovery.
However, their work was soon hailed as a major breakthrough.
Mather received standing ovations when he presented the COBE results
to the American Astronomical Society in 1990. After the results were
published in 1992, famed astronomer and author Stephen Hawking called
it “the greatest discovery of the century, if not of all times.” By
confirming the predictions of the big-bang theory, which states that
the universe was born of a dense and incredibly hot state billions
of years ago, with direct quantitative evidence, the scientists
transformed the study of the early universe from a largely theoretical
pursuit into a new era of direct observation and measurement.
The COBE project gave strong support for the big-bang theory because
it is the only scenario that predicts the kind of cosmic microwave
radiation measured by the satellite. The academy called Mather the
driving force behind the COBE project while Smoot was responsible
for measuring small variations in the temperature of the radiation.
“The very detailed observations that the laureates have carried out
from the COBE satellite have played a major role in the development
of modern cosmology into a precise science,” Royal Swedish Academy
of Sciences
Since 1986, Americans have either won or shared the physics prize
with people from other countries 15 times. Last year, Americans John
L. Hall and Roy J. Glauber and German Theodor W. Haensch won the
prize for work that could lead to better long-distance communication
and more precise navigation worldwide and in space.
2006 Nobel Chemistry Prize
American Roger Kornberg, the son of a Nobel laureate, won the 2006
Nobel chemistry prize for showing how genes are copied, a process
essential to how cells develop and life itself.
Kornberg’s prize came 47 years after he watched his father Arthur
accept the medicine Nobel in Stockholm for his own gene work. It also
crowned the success for U.S. scientists, who have swept all the 2006
Nobel science awards.
The Swedish Academy of Sciences, which makes the10-million-crown
($1.36 US dollar million) award, said Roger Kornberg’s research into
how ribonucleic acid, RNA, moves geneticinformation around the body
was of “fundamental medical importance.”
Kornberg’s discovery showed how DNA, which he has describedas a silent
map, is “read” by RNA and converted into a protein within a cell.
Kornberg was 12 when he traveled to Stockholm to see his father receive
the 1959 Nobel for medicine for studies of how genetic information
is ferried from one DNA molecule to another.
As an undergraduate, the younger Kornberg said he briefly considered
majoring in English literature, but his passion for science won out,
he told a news conference at Stanford University in California,
where he and his father both still work.
The Kornbergs are the eighth set of parent and child laureates.
The Swedish Academy of Sciences said the process of gene copying,
or genetic transcription, was central to life.
“(It) is a key mechanism to the biological machinery. If it does not
work, we die,”Per Ahlberg, member of the Nobel Committee for Chemistry
And because the transfer of information helps explain how a cell
becomes a nerve or liver or muscle cell, understanding transcription
is crucial for the development of various therapeutic applications
of stem cells.
Kornberg used a process called X-ray crystallography – in which
molecules in a chemical reaction are “frozen” into crystals and
photographed using X-rays – to capture transcription in action and
in incredible detail. These images showed the complex structure RNA
uses to make this translation.
2006 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
The 2006 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences has been won by
an American economist who developed theories about unemployment that
better capture how workers and companies actually make decisions
about jobs.
Edmund S. Phelps, 73, a professor at Columbia University in New York,
was cited Monday for research into the relationship between inflation
and unemployment, giving
“Phelps’ work has fundamentally altered our views on how the
macroeconomy operates.” Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Phelps told reporters in his New York apartment that he learned of
the prize in a phone call from Sweden that woke him early in the
morning. He said he had waited for the award for a long time, but
wasn’t expecting it this year.
Phelps was born in Chicago and earned his bachelor’s degree at Amherst
College in Amherst, Massachusetts, in 1955 and his Ph.D. at Yale
University in 1959. He has been the McVickar professor of political
economy at Columbia since 1982.
The Swedish academy said the theoretical framework Phelps developed
in the late 1960s helped economists understand the root of soaring
prices and unemployment in the 1970s and the limitations of policies
to deal with these problems. His framework helped central banks shift
their focus toward using inflation expectations to set monetary policy
rather than concentrating on money supply and demand.
Phelps argued that this view did not take workers’ or companies’
decision-making into account, and his research showed that their
expectations about both unemployment andinflation affected their
actions.
Phelps told reporters that his goal was to make economic theory better
reflect the real world. “I’ve been interested in trying to put people
in a more realistic way into our economic models,” Phelps said. “In
particular I’ve emphasized that people have to form expectations
about the current state of the world and also expectations about the
future, including the consequences for the future of their actions
in the present.”
He said this is not easy because people make decisions with
incomplete information about the state of the world and how the
economy works. “It’s a great big mess, but I think the messiness was
not sufficiently appreciated earlier,” he said.
Phelps did his work at a time economists believed that a government
could not lower unemployment without triggering inflation.
The economics prize is the only one of the awards not established in
the will left by Swedish industrialistAlfred Nobel 111 years ago. The
medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peace prizes were first
awarded in 1901, while the economics prize was set up separately by
the Swedish central bank in 1968. It carries an award of $1.4 million
US dollars.
Last year’s laureates were Robert J. Aumann, a citizen of Israel and
the United States, and American Thomas C. Schelling, for their work
in game-theory analysis. Both men were interviewed by Radio Sweden
in Sweden just before they received their award
Nobel Literature Prize
Turkish writer Orhan Pamuk, author of “My Name is Red”, “Snow”
and half-a-dozen other novels, won the Nobel Literature Prize on
Thursday for a body of work that probes the crossroads of Muslim and
Western cultures.
The Swedish Academy said Pamuk “in the quest for the melancholic
soul of his native city (Istanbul) has discovered new symbols for
the clash and interlacing of cultures.”
The 54-year-old writer is Turkey’s best-known author at home and
abroad, but also a political rebel whose pronouncements on his
country’s history have put its respect for freedom of expression
under the international spotlight.
“In his home country, Pamuk has a reputation as a social commentator
even though he sees himself principally a fiction writer with no
political agenda,” the Swedish Academy
Turkey’s decades-old striving to become European – characterized
by clashes between Islam and secularism, tradition and modernity –
along with the painful impact of an aggressive westernization after
the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, permeate Pamuk’s writing.
Pamuk was the first author in the Muslim world to publicly condemn
the 1989 fatwa against Salman Rushdie, and he took a stand for his
Turkish colleague Yasar Kemal when the latter was put on trial in 1995.
Pamuk himself faced prosecution after telling a Swiss newspaper last
year that 30,000 Kurds and one million Armenians had been killed
during World War I under the Ottoman Turks.
The charges against him sparked widespread international protest,
and were dropped earlier this year.
Just hours before the Swedish Academy made its announcement, the
French lower house of parliament approved a bill making it a punishable
offence to deny that the massacre of Armenians constituted genocide.
Pamuk is the first Turk to win the prestigious prize, and had been
rumoured as one of the frontrunners this year. A chain-smoker, he
mostly shuns the public eye, writing for long hours in an Istanbul
flat overlooking the bridge over the Bosphorus linking Europe and Asia.
Born in 1952 into a prosperous, secular family, Pamuk was intent on
becoming a painter in his youth. He studied architecture at Istanbul
Technical University but later turned to writing and studied journalism
in Istanbul.
He published his prize-winning first novel, “Cevdet Bey and His Sons”,
in 1982, a family chronicle in which he describes the shift from a
traditional Ottoman family environment to a more Western lifestyle.
His second novel, “The House of Silence”, came out in 1983, but it
was his third book, “The White Castle”, published two years later,
that gave him an international reputation.
“Structured as a historical novel set in 17th century Istanbul, it is
“on a symbolic level, the European novel captured then allied with
an alien culture,” the Swedish Academy.
With the 2000 book “My Name is Red” – a love story, murder mystery and
discussion on the role of individuality in art – Pamuk explores the
relationship between East and West, describing an artist’s different
relationship to his work in each culture.
His latest novel is the critically-acclaimed “Snow”, set in Turkey’s
border town of Kars, once a border city between the Ottoman and
Russian empires.
“The novel becomes a tale of love and poetic creativity just as it
knowledgeably describes the political and religious conflicts that
characterise Turkish society of our day,” The Swedish Academy
Pamuk will take home the prize sum of 10 million kronor, or some 1.37
million US dollars.

ANKARA: Foreign Ministry Delivers Harsh Reaction To France

FOREIGN MINISTRY DELIVERS HARSH REACTION TO FRANCE
Zaman Online, Turkey
Oct 12 2006
The Foreign Ministry has stated that relations between Turkey and
France received a severe blow with the passing of the controversial
genocide denial bill.
The statement made by the ministry remarked that, “The long-standing
historical relations between Turkey and France, which have grown
through the centuries with great care, have received a severe blow
today because of the irresponsible attempts – based on groundless
claims – of a group of French politicians who are unable to appreciate
the consequences of the policies they follow.”
The statement continues: “Despite of all the diplomatic and
parliamentary efforts carried out hand in hand at all levels for
a long time by the Turkish Parliament, our citizens in France, our
non-governmental organizations and business environments; after being
submitted to the French National Assembly by the Socialist Party last
May without any results, the passing of the bill this time on Oct.12,
2006 in the French National Assembly, envisaging severe punishment
for denying the Armenian genocide, has caused a profound grievance.”
——————————– ————————————————
S heer Disappointment A statement released said that today’s Armenian
genocide bill would have to go through a long process for it to become
a law.
It must pass through the senate before final approval by the French
president.
Nonetheless, with this first step taken by the French parliament,
the Turkish government is disappointed.
The statement also reassured the Turkish government of efforts by the
French government to put a stop to any progress with the Armenian bill.
“This bill , a violation of both the French constitutional system
that gives the utmost priority to freedom of expression and the
European Treaty that specifies situations when freedom of expression
and of thought can be restricted, goes against the values of liberty,
brotherhood and equality, identified with the French nation, a source
of inspiration for free world,” the statement read.
——————————————- ————————————-
A Typical Contradiction In the statement, it is said “It is a typical
contradiction for a country’s parliament to say, by means of top
authorities, that the parliament has no task of rewriting history,
this responsibility belongs to historians when it is about its own
history but assumes a right to judge other states’ history and to
penalize.” In the statement it is also mentioned that discussing such
a bill in France is an example of a double standard. The statement
reads as follows:
“Despite important reforms we have realized in recent years in order to
develop fundamental rights and freedoms and in a period when Turkey
is advised to take additional steps on freedom of expression, the
discussion on such topics as the bill in France is another double
standard. A State’s credibility depends on protecting values that
they lay down for others to follow.
This bill takes the freedom of thought and expression hostage in
a way totally contrary to a democratic regime has sparked a deep
outrage in the Turkish nation as well as in our Armenian citizens.
Seventy million Turkish people reject the restriction of freedom of
thought and expression with reference to baseless allegations.
Unfortunately, this bill makes France lose its privileged position
by the Turkish people.”

Armenia vote splits Turkish press

Last Updated: Thursday, 12 October 2006, 09:17 GMT 10:17 UK

Armenia vote splits Turkish press
Newspapers in Turkey differ over how to respond to Thursday’s vote in the French parliament on a bill that would make it a crime to deny that Turks committed genocide against Armenians during World War I.
Some commentators believe the vote signals opposition to Turkey joining the European Union, and one writer calls France “a disgrace to the civilised world”.
Other dailies appeal for a level-headed approach so that Turkey does not “humiliate” itself, and argue that Ankara still has many friends in Europe.
CENGIZ CANDAR IN BUGUN
The draft law is actually a clear sign that “the anti-Turkey rebellion in the EU” has begun. That’s why we cannot and must not see today’s vote and its results exclusively in terms of relations between Turkey and France. This contains dimensions that can turn into a Turkey-EU issue, and the opposition against Turkey in the EU has begun to present an ugly face.
HASAN CEMAL IN MILLIYET
In Europe there are not only those who want to keep Turkey outside of the EU. There are also those who defend Turkey’s EU membership in terms of the contribution it will make to the political, economic and strategic interests of Europe. That is why staying on track and continuing the journey to Europe is certainly to Turkey’s benefit.
EMIN COLASAN IN HURRIYET
As long as we keep begging the Europeans on the way towards the EU, many more genocide tales, and many other issues and embarrassing obstacles will be set before us. Those who do not see this are either liars attempting to deceive the nation or the ignorant ready to sell their country to the EU.
MEHMET ALI BIRAND IN POSTA
Let us not provoke those Turkish people who cannot control their reactions. Let us tell France to “stop” but do that within civilised limits. Let us not humiliate ourselves nor incite xenophobia in Turkey.
OKTAY EKSI IN HURRIYET
We stress that France is a disgrace to the civilised world. However, it is a precondition for Turkey, which tells others that “what you are doing is shameful in terms of freedom of expression” first of all to get rid of its own sources of shame.
ILHAN SELCUK IN CUMHURIYET
France is not alone in this move. The West has changed towards Turkey! If France punishes those who say that “there was no Armenian genocide” it will be a shameful historical document and permit us to perceive the new realities of the world.
SAHIN ALPAY IN ZAMAN
Ankara is getting ready to retaliate against France if it turns the denial of the “Armenian Genocide” into a crime. Even if we assume that the EU politicians and elites are not so stupid as to take steps that will push Turkey away from Europe, it seems inevitable that Turkey-EU relations will go through a tense period in the future.

Baku Draws Parallels Between French Bill On Genocide And Karabakh

BAKU DRAWS PARALLELS BETWEEN FRENCH BILL ON GENOCIDE AND KARABAKH
PanARMENIAN.Net
11.10.2006 13:31 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The legislation criminalizing the denial of
the Armenian Genocide to be discussed at the French Parliament
on October 12th, will doubt France’s being impartial as an OSCE
MG co-chair, says a statement of Azeri Milli Mejlis to the French
Parliament. “Milli Mejlis urges its colleagues in the French Parliament
to be attentive and sensitive in discussing the matter in question,”
runs the statement.
In her tern MP Ganira Pashayeva states that introducing the bill in
the French Parliament may result in all Turks and Azeris having to
leave France.
The following is of importance. Azerbaijan has its unsolved problem
– Nagorno Karabakh. Azerbaijan is a CE member and if the EU member
states decide to recognize the Armenian Genocide, it may damage the
Karabakh talks. All diplomatic, interparliamentary steps should be
used to resist to passage of the bill along with Turkey,” Pashayeva
underscored, reports Day.az.

Chess: Babujian holds Deepan

Babujian holds Deepan
Hindu, India
Oct 7 2006
Yerevan: Local hopeful International Master Levon Babujian held
Grandmaster Deepan Chakravarthy to a draw in the third round of the
World Junior chess championship here on Thursday.
Woman Grandmaster Dronavalli Harika saved the blushes for the Indian
contingent on an otherwise ordinary day with a fine technical victory
over Liana Aghabekian of Armenia in the girls’ championship being
organised simultaneously.
It turned out to be a bad day for overnight joint leader Deep Sengupta
who could not hold on to his own against Grandmaster Daniel stellwagen
of Germany in the open while Tania Sachdev who was also jointly
leading the girls’ section fell prey to an optical blunder against
American Tatev Abrahamyan.
In the open section Yuriy Kryvoruchko of Ukraine, Nikita Vitiugov
and Stellwagen share the lead with 3 points from as many games. In
the girls’ section, Chinese duo of Hou Yifan and Shen Yang are at
the top of the tables along with Abrahamyan.
Deepan Chakravrthy is in joint fourth spot on 2.5 while it is a
similar case for Harika who is also on 2.5 points.
The results (Indians unless specified): Daniel Stellwagen (Ned, 3)
bt Deep Sengupta (2); Levon Babujian (Arm, 2.5) drew with Deepan
Chakkravarthy (2.5); Wang Yue (Chn, 2.5) bt Armen Tonoian (Rus, 1.5);
Boris Grachev (Rus, 2) drew with Zaven Andriasian (Arm, 2); Anton
Filippov (Uzb, 2) drew with Ildar Khairullin (Rus, 1.5); Zhao Jun
(Chn, 2.5) bt Ong Kezli (Swe, 1.5); Eduard-Andrei Valeanu (Rom, 1.5)
drew with Abhijeet Gupta (1.5); Rahul Sangma (1.5) bt Niek Chernih
(Aus, 0.5)
Girls: Hou Yifan (Chn, 3) bt Beata Kadziolka (Pol, 2); Bianca Muhren
(Ned, 2) lost to Shen Yang (Chn, 3); Tatev Abrahamyan (US, 3) bt Tania
Sachdev (2); Mongontuul Bathuyag (Mgl, 2.5) drew with Zhang Jilin
(Chn, 2.5); Liana Aghabekian (Arm, 2) lost to D Harika (2.5); Maka
Purtseladze (Geo, 2.5) bt Mikadze Miranda (Geo, 1.5); Dana Aketaeva
(Kaz, 2) drew with Yulduz Hamrakulova (Uzb, 2); Olga Dolgova (Rus,
2.5) bt Alexandra Savurko (Blr, 1.5); Elena Tairova (Rus, 2) bt
Kruttika Nadig (1); Eesha Karavade (1.5) drew with Nune Darbinian
(Arm, 1.5); Mary Ann Gomes (2) bt Mona Khaled (Egy, 1); Priya (1.5)
bt Frisk Ellinor (Swe, 1.5); Soumya Swaminathan (0.5) drew with Zarkua
Elisabed (Geo, 1). – PTI

Armenia Chosen As Transit Country For Georgia-Russia Flights

ARMENIA CHOSEN AS TRANSIT COUNTRY FOR GEORGIA-RUSSIA FLIGHTS
PanARMENIAN.Net
04.10.2006 14:47 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Georgian Ministry of Economic Development jointly
with the Aviation Department has worked out a new schedule of flights
from Georgia to Russia. According to the new schedule, Armenia was
chosen a transit country. The passengers will experience no problems,
they will freely travel from Armenia to Russia, the Georgian Aviation
Department says, reported Georgia Online.

Army Under Civilian Control In Europe

ARMY UNDER CIVILIAN CONTROL IN EUROPE
By Suleyman Kurt, Zaman, Ankara
Zaman, Turkey
Oct 4 2006
In response to General Yasar Buyukanit’s remarks on the EU, European
Commissioner for Enlargement, Olli Rehn, said “The army is under
civilian control in European democracies.”
Finland’s Olli Rehn had meetings in the Turkish capital of Ankara on
the first anniversary of full membership negotiations between Turkey
and the EU.
In a symposium titled “European Social Model and Syndical Rights in the
Process of Negotiation with EU,” Rehn fielded questions from the press.
In response to a reporter’s question “Are there reactionary movements
in Turkey?”, a reference to the Turkish Chief of General Staff ‘s
remarks, Rehn said “There is a misunderstanding here.”
Stating they are open to dialogue with Turkish Armed Forces (TSK),
Rehn noted he does not question their professionalism.
“We have a deep respect for the TSK. They support international
peace-keeping forces. We consider Turkey’s general outlook with
respect to democratically elected governments. Turkey may take pride
in the reforms it has realized. It must be particularly proud of the
reforms in army-civilian relationships.. In European democracies,
the Army is under civilian control,” Rehn said.
“I am here because I do not want this first anniversary of negotiations
to be the last,” Rehn said and he asked Ankara “to restart the reform
process and fulfill liabilities in the supplementary protocol” in
order to prevent a possible “train crash.”
Rehn asked that article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code be amended and
said: “This article is in no compliance with EU standards. Turkey is
a democratic and powerful country. Does it need such an article?”
Rehn said this change is “related with Turkey’s negotiations with
the EU.”
Stating the EU needs Turkey, the European Commissioner said “A train
crash can be prevented with necessary political will.”
In the framework of his contacts in Ankara concerning the amendment
of the article 301, Rehn also paid visits to Minister of Justice
Cemil Cicek and main opposition leader Deniz Baykal, but failed to
obtain support.
Criticizing Rehn’s approach of the article 301, Cicek replied
to a relevant question from the reporters as follows: “Instead of
asking about this, ask about the draft in France.” [Referring to the
draft bill envisioning punishment for those rejecting the Armenian
“genocide.”]
The main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) leader stated
similar articles exist in EU member countries as well, and this
article may become redundant in Turkey in a few years’ time.
Recognizing genocide is no condition for membership
Rehn repeated that recognition of the Armenian genocide allegations
is not a condition for EU membership.
Stating Turkey should handle “such issues” both within itself and with
its neighbor Armenia, Rehn gave support to Turkey’s proposal to set up
“a joint commission of historians.”
Rehn and Gul to Discuss Finnish Formula for Cyprus
The commissioner for enlargement, in talks he will hold with Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul,
will discuss proposals put forward by EU Term President Finland in
order to prevent a possible “train crash.”
Rehn spoke “hopefully” before the talk, but rumors in Ankara that
“the proposal contains imbalances” indicate the difficulty in finding
a solution.
Previously, Term President Finland offered a package of proposals
to Turkey, Greece and Cyprus in order to overcome the problems over
“Cyprus.”
Rehn will repeat the proposal in today’s meetings and ask for
a solution.
Ankara will remind Rehn of the EU’s promises on removing sanctions
against Northern Cyprus.
The parties did not give a “negative reply” to Finland’s proposals
in the first stage.
Communicating the proposal verbally, not in writing, is interpreted as
“taking the pulse.”
Rehn, in his statement yesterday, said: “I do not want to be too
optimistic, but this is an encouraging situation. If parties wanted
to reject the formula, they would make it leak to the press.”
However, no such atmosphere is perceived in Ankara.
Though certain elements in the package of proposals also exist in
Turkey’s “Cyprus Action Plan,” sources think there is imbalance in
other elements.