ECHR satisfies request for interim measure over the case of 5 Armenian POWs in Azerbaijan

 

Save

Share

 18:28,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 29, ARMENPRESS. The ECHR has demanded documented information from the Azerbaijani government about the detention place and conditions of another 5 Armenian war prisoners, ARMENPRESS reports lawyer Artak Zeynalyan wrote on his Facebook page.  

Based on the footages released by the Azerbaijani media the war prisoners were identified and requests were submitted to the ECHR on behalf of their family members to apply interim measure for protecting their right to life and freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

The court has set a deadline of November 3 to provide the required information.

CivilNet: “The War Has Changed Its Nature”, Armenian Defense Ministry Says

CIVILNET.AM

08:12

The war continues, and it has changed its nature to some extent, noted Artsrun Hovhannisyan, representative of Armenia’s Defense Ministry, during a press conference on October 27.

“After achieving success in the lowlands, the Azerbaijani Armed Forces are trying to establish their presence in the forests and in the mountains, which is not easy to achieve. In terms of tactics, battles are becoming more difficult and intense,” Hovhannisyan said. 

The defense ministry representative mentioned that the opponent has lost its huge quantitative and technological advantage, and that this is due to various circumstances, including the location of current battles and the improvement of Armenian soldiers’ skills and experience.

“Today, the enemy attempted to carry out attacks in the direction of Berdzor. It also attempted to approach the border of the Republic of Armenia from the southern direction. All of the attempts were thwarted,” continued Hovhannisyan. “The fight against the subversive groups attempting to enter villages continues. They generally approach in small groups and bring with them light weapons. After encountering Armenian units, they retreat through the forests and mountains. These light operations continue 24 hours a day.”

Villages and towns in Karabakh’s Martuni and Askeran regions have seen the heaviest Azerbaijani missile attacks in recent days. Civilian deaths and injuries have been reported by the Office of the Human Rights Ombudsman.

Iranian army commander vows “strict punishment to takfir-terrorists” near borders

Save

Share

 15:05,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 27, ARMENPRESS. The Commander of the Iranian Army Major-General Abdolrahim Mousavi has vowed “strict punishment” to the “takfir-terrorists” near Iranian borders, local news media reported.

Mousavi made the comments after visiting the Iranian air defense troops and inspecting the readiness level of the units at the north-western borders.

Mousavi stressed the need to ensure the safety of residents in the border towns.

He said the air defense units are on high alert in the north-western part of Iran and the units will be increased is required.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

How the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict could impact Israel’s regional strategic landscape

Jewish News Syndicate
Oct 15 2020
 
 
 
Many Iranian Azeris, who estimates suggest may comprise up to a quarter or even a third of Iran’s population, have been demonstrating against Iran’s support for Armenia, while praising Israel for its deep strategic ties with Azerbaijan.
 
By Sean Savage
 
 
( / JNS) Over the last several weeks, Armenia and Azerbaijan have been engaged in an escalating conflict centered around a decades-long dispute over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which is internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territory but has illegally occupied by Armenia since their first war ended in 1994.
 
While this conflict seemingly revolves around a dispute between two small Caucasus countries, it has larger regional and even global implications.
 
While the conflict in the Caucasus does not directly threaten Israel, its long-standing close ties with Azerbaijan and fledgling relations with Armenia—coupled with the larger geopolitical landscape of the region involving heavyweights Turkey, Russia and Iran—put the Jewish state on high alert for developments.
 
“Israel and Azerbaijan maintain a strategic alliance. It is not just about arms sales or oil, but a very deep strategic cooperation,” Brenda Shaffer, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Global Energy Center, told JNS.
 
“Azerbaijan’s long-term open friendship with Israel has helped other Muslim-majority states establish open cooperation with Israel and even contributed to the current blossoming of ties between Israel and several Muslim-majority states, like the UAE.”
 
She said that “Azerbaijan, despite bordering Iran, was not afraid to openly cooperate with Israel over the years. This showed other Muslim majority states that they can, without worrying about repercussions from Iran or other states, establish open cooperation with Israel.”
 
Armenian military officials say that 532 soldiers have been killed since Sept. 27, when hostilities began. Azerbaijan has not disclosed how many soldiers have been killed, though reports that 42 civilians have died since the start of fighting.
 
On Sept. 10, Armenia and Azerbaijan signed a Russian-brokered truce stipulating that a cease-fire should eventually led to a deal on settling the conflict.
 
However, in the days following the ceasefire, renewed clashes have taken place with both sides blaming the other for continued attacks in violating of the agreement.
 
On Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo urged both sides to implement the ceasefire.
 
“We deplore the loss of human life and remain committed to a peaceful settlement,” said Pompeo.
 
‘Exert pressure on public opinion’
 
Indeed, as the fighting intensified in recent weeks, Israel has come under fire for its close military ties with Azerbaijan. Social-media video emerged in early October showing Israeli-made LORA short-range ballistic missiles being used by Azerbaijani forces against Armenia military targets. Similarly, Azerbaijani officials have confirmed the use of Israeli-made drones as well.
 
The use of Israeli-made weapons against Armenia, which also has diplomatic relations with Jerusalem, has led to a diplomatic row between the two countries after Armenia recalled its ambassador to Israel over the arms sales in early October.
 
Similarly, the head of the self-declared Artsakh Republic, which is the Armenian-backed illegal government of Nagorno-Karabakh region, accused Israel of being complicit in Azerbaijan’s “genocidal” war.
 
At the same time, Israel’s Supreme Court also rejected a petition to ban arms sales to Azerbaijan, saying there was a lack of evidence that Israeli-made weapons were being used for war crimes against Armenia.
 
“Israel has friendly ties with the Armenian people and is home to a vibrant Armenian community. On strategic issues, however, the two states are on different sides. Armenia has close cooperation with Iran, and much of the military supplies to Armenia today transit Iranian territory,” said Shaffer.
 
“In the grand scheme of things, the longer the conflict is on high flames, the greater the chance Israel will be confronted by other countries.”
 
Azerbaijani Ambassador to the United States Elin Suleymanov accused Armenia of attempting to cause a wider confrontation by drawing in international players such as Turkey, Russia and Israel. “Azerbaijan and Israel have a very wide-ranging relationship. It’s very comprehensive and by far not limited to military cooperation, although security and defense is, of course, an important factor in these ties,” he told JNS.
 
“Azerbaijan is a country that is under attack and an illegal occupation, so it’s natural that Azerbaijan buys military equipment for self-defense,” continued Suleymanov. “We buy from many countries, including Russia, Turkey and Israel. The Armenian side exaggerates this issue and focuses on Israel so much in order to exert pressure on public opinion.”
 
Instead, Suleymanov noted that Azerbaijan is being attacked from its own territory by an illegal occupying force.
 
“It is fundamentally important to understand that all fighting today is taking place within the internationally recognized territories of Azerbaijan. An Armenian army is illegally inside the territory of Azerbaijan, killing and bombing our civilians,” he told JNS. “Azerbaijan has repeatedly stated that we have no military objectives on territories of Armenia and we do not plan to attack Armenia.”
 
‘Threaten gas markets in Europe’
 
Indeed, both Armenia and Azerbaijan are former Soviet Republics, regaining their independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. Since then they have been stuck in an unresolved conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, but now controlled and occupied by ethnic Armenians.
 
The current round of fighting between is the second stage of fighting that began last July. During the summer conflict, Armenia attacked Azerbaijani towns along their international border, about 300 kilometers north of where the current fighting is taking place.
 
“Azerbaijan is now showing Armenia that there are costs and risks in its attacks.”
 
During the July flare-up, Armenia sought to undermine the security of the energy corridor. That area is also close to several strategic oil pipelines running from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea and the Mediterranean, which also supply some 40 percent of Israel’s oil. In addition to oil, that area also hosts the Southern Gas Corridor, which is a new pipeline that will supply natural gas to Europe.
 
“Moscow is likely to have supported Armenia’s attacks in July on Azerbaijan in close proximity to the energy corridor,” said Shaffer, adding that it was done to “to signal to Azerbaijan not to attempt to threaten its gas markets in Europe.”
 
Additionally, Armenian Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan has also pushed a new military doctrine with the aim to control all of its occupied territories, termed “New Wars for New Territories,” which indicated that Azerbaijan needed to fear it could lose even more territories if it sought to take its territories back.
 
“The current round of fighting is connected to the July phase. Azerbaijan is now showing Armenia that there are costs and risks in its attacks on Azerbaijan as well,” said Shaffer.
 
While the Armenian-occupied Nagorno-Karabakh region is at the center of the dispute between the two countries, Shaffer noted that most of the current fighting is actually taking place in seven additional districts occupied by Armenia during the war back in the early 1990s.
 
“This is an aspect that most of the world press has missed—that most of the area Armenia occupies is outside Nagorno-Karabakh,” she said, adding that Armenia has been expanding settlements in the areas outside of Nagorno-Karabakh and has rejected peace offers over the years to leave these areas.
 
‘A challenge for Tehran’
 
While it’s unlikely that Israel would be pulled into the conflict in any capacity, the Jewish state’s support for Azerbaijan could harm its relations with other allies, such as Cyprus and Greece.
 
“Israel and Azerbaijan maintain a strategic alliance. It is not just about arms sales or oil.”
 
“Israel will be criticized by Western countries for providing the Azeris with drones, which have been massacring Armenian targets, and by her close Hellenic allies for taking a side with Turkey (a longtime rival of the Cypriots and Greeks) and against Armenia (having strong political, cultural and religious ties with Greece),” Benjamin Weil, director of the project for Israel’s National Security at the Endowment for Middle East Truth, told JNS.
 
“In the grand scheme of things, the longer the conflict is on high flames, the greater the chance Israel will be confronted by other countries,” he said.
 
Nevertheless, the conflict in the Caucasus could also create a new front in the ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran.
 
Iran, which shares a border with Azerbaijan and is also home to a large population of Azeris, has strong ties with Armenia.
 
“[Armenian] Prime Minister [Nikol] Pashinyan, during his visit last year to Iran, offered for Armenia to serve as a transit state for Iranian gas to Europe. Armenia has a military unit in Syria that operates under the Russian forces there,” said Shaffer.
 
Additionally, Russia, which does not share a border with Armenia, is supplying the country with weapons via Iran.
 
“Tehran’s support for Armenia and its occupation of Azerbaijani incenses many members of the Azerbaijani community in Iran, and this could create a challenge for Tehran,” said Shaffer.
 
As a result, many Iranian Azeris, wh0 estimates suggest may comprise up to a quarter or even a third of Iran’s population, have been demonstrating against Iran’s support for Armenia, chanting “Death to Armenia” at rallies and expressing solidarity with Azerbaijan’s situation.
 
“Israel’s close cooperation with Azerbaijan seems to be building appreciation domestically in Iran itself for Israel,” said Shaffer. “Accordingly, many ethnic Azerbaijanis in Iran are writing on social-media positive posts on Israel’s support for Azerbaijan.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Armenia hails new weapon in war with Azerbaijan: Kim Kardashian

The Telegraph, UK
Oct 10 2020

So big is Kim Kardashian’s online profile that her statements on Nagorno Karabakh have been viewed by millions


Samvel Balasayan does not look like the sort of man who spends much time Keeping Up With The Kardashians. As mayor of Armenia’s second-biggest city, Gyumri, he has enough on his plate as it is – and like most middle-aged men, he is not that fascinated by the day-to-day lives of LA reality TV stars.

Yet Mr Balasayan can boast one thing that most of Kim Kardashian’s 190 million social media fans can only dream of: he has actually met her. Gyumri is where her ancestors hail from, and when she returned to the city five years ago for an episode of Keeping Up with the Kardashians, he was in the VIP greeting party.

“Gyumri has become well known through her programme,” beamed Mr Balasayan, who is keen to promote the city as a tourist destination. “We are delighted that Kim has us put on the world map.”

Right now, though, Ms Kardashian has turned her considerable publicity powers to a more pressing Armenian cause: the war against Azerbaijan over the disputed enclave of Nagorno Karabakh, which has claimed more than 300 lives since it broke out two weeks ago.

“Please share the news,” she posted on her Instagram account. “We are praying for the brave men & women risking their lives to protect Artsakh (the local name for Nagorno Karabakh’s self-declared republic) & #Armenia.”

So big is Ms Kardashian’s online profile that her statements on Nagorno Karabakh may have been viewed as much, if not more, than those of Armenia’s elected leaders. But while many Kardashian followers may have only a passing interest in Nagorno Karabakh, there is another worldwide constituency for whom it could not be closer to the heart: the global Armenian diaspora.


Spread everywhere from Los Angeles to Lebanon, and with pockets too in France, Russia and west London, the diaspora is a legacy from World War One, when up to 1.5m Armenians died at the hands of Ottoman Turks.

Turkey denies Armenian claims that it was a genocide, saying the deaths occured during civil war, but there is no doubting the scale of the exodus. The diaspora is an estimated 11m strong – compared to just 3m in Armenia itself.

Since the flare up of the conflict with Azerbaijan, the exiles have been mobilising en masse – some staging demonstrations, some organising relief supplies, and some even volunteering for front line duty.

“Armenia is a small country always at the mercy of other empires, and we have only two allies: our army and our diaspora,” said Vartan Marashlyan, executive director of the Repat Armenia Organisation, a group based in the capital, Yerevan, which encourages diaspora engagement. “Whenever we have an existential issue, the entire nation becomes an army.”

The diaspora previously mobilised in major fashion in 1988, helping Gyumri after an earthquake that killed some at least 25,000.

With the diaspora traditionally well-organised – some 30,000 Armenian community and church groups exist worldwide – the contribution to the latest war effort is substantial. Some £60m in donations has already reached the Hayastan All Armenian Fund, a national charity.

Meanwhile, thousands have come back to the homeland to help, from LA-based doctors and trauma psychologists to Russian-Armenian business tycoons. Some offer expertise in IT or logistics – while others, like Allen Sayadyan, a 40-year-old LA estate agent, simply offer goodwill.

The Telegraph bumped into him last weekend in Nagorno Karabakh, where he and several friends had driven to donate medical supplies, cigarettes and water. At the time he was visiting the Holy Saviour Cathedral in the town of Shushi, which has since had its dome shelled by Azeri forces.

“I’m just here to help however I can really,” he said. “I’d fight if asked to, although to be honest I’ve never picked up a gun before.”

Another expat who has swung into action is IT project manager Haik Kazazian, 32, who moved back to Armenia two years ago from Montreal. When the war broke out, he put out a fundraising appeal on Facebook to friends in the Canadian diaspora, expecting no more than CDN $500 (£300). He has already received CDN $20,000 (£11,750).

“Nobody in Montreal is sleeping at night, everyone is as worried as they can be,” said Mr Kazarian, as he stood in a yard piled high with vegetables, toiletries ready to be sent in a van to families displaced by the fighting,

Like Mr Sayadyan, Mr Kazarian has no experience of military service, although he did offer his services at his local army HQ in Yerevan. However, with Armenia still full of combat veterans from the last war with Azerbaijan in the 1990s, and also running a national service program, he got the impression he wouldn’t be needed.

“My sense was that if things reached the point where they needed me to enlist, then the war effort really would be going badly,” he smiled. “Aid convoys are probably the best way I can help.”

In similar fashion, nobody is expecting Ms Kardashian to swap her raunchy outfits for designer military fatigues and head to the frontlines. But back in Gyumri, her backing of the cause has certainly raised morale among some of those trying to help.

“I’d like her phone number for sure,” joked Svoyan Sasun, 30, as he manned a city centre stall collecting food and clothes. “People criticise here, but when the nation is in its hour of need, everyone loves her.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/10/10/armenia-hails-new-weapon-war-azerbaijan-kim-kardashian/?fbclid=IwAR30wMQy686ZpzsF4fxh2_Y4XykUF45dL4DHreoVB4MJna2fJCtmdEACuVs

Russian weapons and proxy fights add to tensions in one of the world’s ‘most kinetic areas’

Business Insider
Oct 10 2020
  • Reports that Turkey activated a Russian-made air-defense system to track US-built fighter jets raised hackles in Washington, which is pressuring Ankara to get rid of the system.
  • The reports have also added to existing tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea region, where Turkey has a number of disputes with its neighbors, including its NATO allies.

A report this week that Turkey activated a Russian-made air-defense system to track Greek fighter jets raised US ire and added to tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean, an increasingly troublesome region for NATO.

Greek outlet Ekathimerini.com reported Monday that Turkey activated radars on its S-400s to track Greece’s US-made F-16 fighter jets as they returned from a multinational exercise near Cyprus on August 27.

Turkey’s 2017 purchase of the S-400 has been a problem for the US from the start. Its delivery in July 2017 prompted the US to kick Ankara out of the F-35 program, citing concerns Russia could use the system to gather data on the jet.

Turkey’s tests of the S-400 with its own F-16s late last year were also seen as an implicit threat by some in Congress.

It remains unclear if Turkey actually did activate its S-400s to track the Greek jets, and Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen and Republican Sen. James Lankford want answers from the Trump administration.

“Reports of this activation make clear that Turkey has no intention of reversing course and divesting of this system,” the senators wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. “Additionally, the slow pace at which the Department of Defense is moving to remove Turkey from the F-35 supply chain has no doubt emboldened [Turkish] President Erdogan.”

The senators said the reports added to concerns “about Russia’s ability to access sensitive data.” They asked Pompeo for more information about the August 27 incident as well as whether Turkey has integrated the S-400 with NATO’s Link 16 tactical data link and if that access facilitates Russian intelligence-gathering.

A State Department spokesperson said they were “aware of these reports” and “deeply concerned” about Turkey continuing work on the S-400.

Turkey’s suspension from the F-35 program “signaled the seriousness with which the administration approaches this issue,” the spokesperson said.

Southeastern Europe has become a troublesome front for NATO.

Russian activity there has been a major concern, prompting Adm. James Foggo, former head of US naval forces in Europe, to call the Eastern Mediterranean “one of the most kinetic areas in the world” in a June speech. But Turkey’s actions have made it a thorn in the side of its NATO allies.

Turkey has clashed with the US and its European neighbors over the war in Syria. The Libyan civil war has become a point of contention, as shown by a June incident in which Turkish warships escorting an arms shipment to Libya reportedly harassed a French frigate on a NATO patrol. (France has also taken a more aggressive approach to disputes in the Mediterranean.)

Tensions have risen between Turkey and Greece, historic foes and NATO members, over a longstanding territorial dispute in the Mediterranean, though NATO said this month that they had agreed on a mechanism “to reduce the risk of incidents and accidents in the Eastern Mediterranean.”

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan embraced that vision after a failed coup in 2016, scorned by what he saw as a lack of a strong response by other Western countries.

After that coup, Erdogan “dramatically reduced the independence” of the Turkish military, said Ben Hodges, who commanded the US Army in Europe between 2015 and 2017.

“Many officers who had longtime NATO or Western relationships, a lot of them are gone now,” Hodges told Insider. “You still have the same very professional, talented, competent Turkish military, but you can tell that they are extremely cautious about saying anything or doing anything that would be seen as not 100% in line with what would be expected from Ankara.”

Erdogan’s frustration with NATO allies over issues like the war in Syria as well as their reluctance to provide Ankara with other air-defense systems has been cited as motivation for the S-400 purchase.

During a discussion of the S-400 at a recent meeting that included retired Turkish military officers, Hodges said he was told that the purchase “was a decision made by the administration, not an institutional decision.”

“In other words, it was not the normal procurement process,” Hodges said.

In their letter, Van Hollen and Lankford noted that the Trump administration hasn’t sanctioned Turkey for the S-400 purchase under the Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act, which is meant to punish Russia for its interference in the 2016 election and has been used to sanction buyers of Russian arms.

The US continues “to stress at the highest levels” that the S-400 is “a major obstacle” in Turkey’s relations with the US and NATO and risks CAATSA sanctions, the State Department spokesperson said.

Van Hollen and Lankford also expressed concern about reports of an S-400 test planned next week in the Turkish city of Sinop, on the Black Sea, where US and NATO aircraft are very active. (Russia has S-400s in Crimea and its Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad, both near where NATO aircraft are active.)

Turkey said in March that the US offered to sell it the Patriot missile-defense system if it wouldn’t operate the S-400. Turkish officials said they were evaluating the offer but hadn’t changed their plans for the S-400.

Hodges said a test next week would be “a mistake” and hoped that the US was looking for ways to give Turkey “an offramp.”

Only Russia benefits from this dispute, Hodges added, “because they’re seeing two NATO allies gnawing on each other, and this is an erosion of the trust between Turkey and the rest of Europe.”

https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-weapons-proxy-fights-add-to-turkey-greece-nato-tensions-2020-10?amp&fbclid=IwAR0S7cGm6NKSivAn7CQYIJ0frKjC23HQz1c2vKbvmGcXqb6-2Qzc2V0QqbA

‘We are Prepared to Recognize Artsakh,’ Schiff Tells Armenia’s Ambassador

October 8,  2020



Rep. Adam Schiff

“I believe the United States should make clear to Azerbaijan and Turkey that if they persist in this violence instead of embracing a peaceful settlement of the conflict, we are prepared to recognize the Republic of Artsakh as an independent nation,” said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) pledging to work with the international community to “achieve the same.”

Schiff made the statement during a conversation he had on Thursday with Armenia’s Ambassador to the United States Varuzhan Nersesyan about the continuing conflict in Artsakh.

“We discussed Azerbaijan’s ongoing military campaign, aided and abetted by Turkey and the foreign fighters it is bringing in from Syria, and which has killed hundreds and displaced up to half of the civilian population of Artsakh. We also discussed Azerbaijan’s deliberate bombing of a historic Armenian Church, the Ghazanchetsots Cathedral, in the city of Shushi,” Schiff said.

“For decades, through the OSCE Minsk Group, the United States has supported a peaceful, democratic, and negotiated resolution to the dispute surrounding Nagorno Karabakh. We have persisted in this policy even as Azerbaijan launched countless assaults and as their leadership frequently threatened war to redraw the line of contact by force,” added Schiff.”

“Presidents Aliyev and Erdogan must understand that they cannot resolve a decades long border dispute though the indiscriminate use of force against civilians, and the United States will not stand idly by as they attempt to do so. The only resolution of this dispute can be through negotiations, not raining artillery and bombs on Armenian civilians,” said Schiff.

Schiff urged decisive action by the Trump Administration in an interview on Wednesday with Asbarez Editor Ara Khachatourian over Zoom, saying the White House should condemn Ankara and Baku for threatening regional stability and security.

Since Azerbaijan began indiscriminately bombing Artsakh on September 27, Schiff has joined House and Senate leaders in calling on Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to cut U.S. military assistance to Azerbaijan and imposing sanctions against Turkey for its unequivocal support for Baku’s military aggression and destructive interference in the Karabakh conflict.

He has also co-authored, along with Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) legislation to condemn Azerbaijan and Turkey for their military aggression against Artsakh and Armenia.

CivilNet: Nagorno-Karabakh: Ninth Day of the War, Pashinyan Calls the Newly Demobilized to Draft

CIVILNET.AM

5 October, 2020 21:33

Intense fighting occurs between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the southern area of the front.

An Azerbaijani shelling campaign once again occurs against the city of Stepanakert. 

The Armenian PM calls on conscripts that recently completed their military service to sign up to be drafted.

Azerbaijan’s President states that a solution to the conflict should be found through dialogue, but with preconditions. 


https://www.civilnet.am/news/2020/10/05/Nagorno-Karabakh-Ninth-Day-of-the-War-Pashinyan-Calls-the-Newly-Demobilized-to-Draft/399367

Caucasus conflict heralds clash of the titans

Asia Times
by Richard Giragosian
Russia, Turkey and Iran all have big vested interests in the budding
armed conflict over Nagorno Karabakh
YEREVAN – Azerbaijan’s military offensive on the Armenia-controlled
Nagorno Karabakh enclave threatens to spiral quickly into a wider
regional conflict, one that pits Russia and Turkey in a volatile proxy
theater.
With each powerful regional actor aligned on opposed sides of the
fighting, the deeper contest between Moscow and Ankara is now set to
trigger what some analysts foresee as a monumental “clash of the
titans.”
As Azerbaijan’s offensive enters a third day, Karabakh Armenian forces
are engaged in an intense effort to defend territory and prevent any
breakthrough by the Azerbaijani side.
Armenia has reported more than 80 of their troops killed; Azerbaijan
has yet to release any official death toll for its soldiers. The UN
Security Council was set to meet on Tuesday for emergency talks on
Karabakh behind closed doors, diplomats told AFP.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Russia was monitoring the
situation closely and that the current priority was to “stop the
hostilities, not to deal with who is right and who is wrong.”
Tehran said it was ready “to use all of its capacities to establish a
ceasefire and start talks between the two sides,” with foreign
ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh calling for “an immediate end to
the conflict.”
But Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan demanded Armenia end its
“occupation” of Karabakh, whose ethnic Armenians declared a breakaway
republic following a war for autonomy in 1991.
“The time has come for the crisis in the region that started with the
occupation of Nagorno Karabakh to be put to an end,” Erdogan said.
“Now Azerbaijan must take matters into its own hands.”
Amid this dynamic situation, the stage is now set for a heated
competition between regional rivals.
The Karabakh triangle
The South Caucasus has long been a region of contest with a history of
submission and subjugation by larger powers. Over the centuries, the
Persians, Ottoman and Russian empires have all fought for conquest and
control of the area.
This geographic vulnerability in recent days was exposed once again,
as the renewed fighting over Karabakh invited a return of regional
power competition.
The modern replication of this geopolitical contest is between Russia
and Turkey, with Iran as an important yet understated and underrated
third party power. Each of these three regional players has vested
interests and valuable influence in the South Caucasus.
But with this latest outbreak of serious fighting, the risk of
outright war has likely sharpened their attention. From this
perspective of a “Karabakh triangle,” the geometry of the coming clash
reveals a complex and looming struggle for dominance.
Currently, Russia, Turkey and Iran remain vigilant and are reportedly
closely following events as they unfold on the battlefield. Of the
three, Turkey is the most active, however. Turkey’s support of its
Azerbaijan ally increased significantly several months earlier.
This acceleration in Turkish activity is mainly driven by a desire to
regain its former role as the leading military patron of Azerbaijan,
an objective that has only intensified in the wake of Turkish
frustration of having been supplanted by Russia and Israel in arms
sales to Azerbaijan.
By providing military training and equipment to their Azerbaijani
partner, Turkey has encouraged Azerbaijan to adopt a more assertive
and even aggressive posture vis-a-vis Armenia.
Recent military exercises under Turkish tutelage have fostered more
assertiveness within the Azerbaijani officer corps, which in turn has
arguably engendered a considerable degree of over-confidence among
rank and file soldiers.
Due to insufficient and inadequate unit cohesion, discipline and basic
training, the overall combat readiness of ordinary Azerbaijani
military forces is low.
Ironically, from the Turkish perspective, such military need and
necessity is preferred, as it only deepens the Azerbaijani military’s
dependence on Turkish assistance and guidance.
On a broader level, Turkey has also benefited from an apparent vacuum,
as Russian military overtures to Azerbaijan have been strictly limited
to large and expensive arms deals and the procurement of modern
offensive weapons systems.
Although this has been somewhat supplemented in recent years by a
Russian effort at cultivating ties to the senior ranks, the lack of
ties to lower levels such as unit commanders and mid-level officers
has provided Turkish military advisers and instructors with a clear
advantage.
The Russian edge
The second angle of this Karabakh triangle, Russia, holds distinct
advantages that surpass Turkish influence. Despite trepidation over
Russian ambitions in the region, Azerbaijan now sees Russia as the one
pivotal player in the Karabakh conflict.
This perception stems from several factors. First, Azerbaijan
recognizes that Moscow has seized the diplomatic initiative in the
Karabakh peace process, and that fellow mediators France and the US
have grudgingly ceded the diplomatic lead to Russia.
A second advantage for Russia is that not only does Armenia have no
real security alternative to Russia, but the greater the tension and
the more serious the threat from the fighting makes Armenia even more
dependent on Russian security promises.
Despite constant and consistent Russian pressure on the Armenian
government, there is a transactional nature to Armenian relations with
Russia, with Yerevan forced to bargain with Moscow often from a
position of weakness rather than strength.
Third, as demonstrated in earlier rounds of fighting, most notable in
April 2016, only Russia responded to renewed hostilities quickly and
effectively. This is also evident in the reality that the only
ceasefire agreements reached in the Karabakh conflict were brokered
with Russian involvement.
Over the longer term as well, Russia will be essential for any
eventual negotiated resolution to the Karabakh conflict. Moreover,
Russia will likely be the only regional actor capable of enforcing
peace and helping to ensure a durable “day after” any potential peace
deal.
Persian power
Looking to the future and beyond Turkey’s power projection and
Russia’s strategic advantages, Iran is the overlooked third element of
the Karabakh triangle. It is not only disingenuous to underestimate
Iran as a true rival regional actor, it is also dangerous.
More specifically, in the wake of the failure of Iran’s anticipated
westward turn after it’s now dead nuclear deal, Iran is now preparing
to return to the South Caucasus region.
But Iran’s underlying tension with the West will be less of a driver
for Iran in the South Caucasus, unlike Iraq and Syria for two notable
examples.
Rather, Iran’s looming return as a regional actor in the South
Caucasus will be motivated by a desire in Tehran to push back against
two key rivals and perceived interlopers: Russia and Turkey. This will
also be based on an appeal to Shiite Islam, seeking to both bully and
befriend Azerbaijan as a fellow Shiite state.
Moreover, Tehran will also be careful not to directly confront or
challenge either Ankara or Moscow, but rather will likely steadily
undermine and rely on subterfuge to erode its rivals’ positions in the
region.
In this regard, Iran will leverage its already sound relations with
its only stable and friendly neighbor, Armenia, and resist any
challenge from Azerbaijan as the leading Shiite “spokes-state” and
only theological Shiite state.
Against that backdrop, the next stage of fighting over Karabakh will
likely usher in a new and even more unpredictable period of
instability and insecurity in what some foresee as a coming clash of
regional titans.
 

WP: New fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan threatens to reignite 30-year-old conflict

Washington Post
Sept 27 2020
 
 
New fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan threatens to reignite 30-year-old conflict
 
By Robyn Dixon
September 27 at 9:01 AM
 
MOSCOW — Renewed fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan on Sunday threatened to reignite a three-decade-old conflict over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh.
 
It was the worst outbreak of fighting in the region since 2016, when four days of clashes left 200 dead. Each side blamed each other for the crisis Sunday; both declared martial law as tensions escalated.
 
At least one Azerbaijani helicopter was shot down Sunday. Armenia announced the full mobilization of its military as the situation threatened to spiral out of control.
 
[The crisis over Nagorno-Karabakh, explained]
 
Armenia claimed to have destroyed two helicopters, three drones and three tanks, saying it was in response to Azerbaijani aggression.
 
Azerbaijani officials said only one helicopter was shot down, with no loss of life. Azerbaijan said it was mounting a counteroffensive and claimed it had destroyed 12 Armenian air defense systems.
 
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was on the phone with both sides Sunday urging an end to fighting, according to a spokeswoman. Moscow has close ties with both sides.
 
“In view of the escalating situation around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Lavrov is conducting intensive contacts in a bid to encourage the sides to cease fire and begin negotiations to stabilize the situation,” spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told reporters on Sunday.
 
World powers urged an end to hostilities after Armenia and Azerbaijan clashed on Sept. 27, stemming from tensions over the Nagorno-Karabakh region. (Reuters)
 
Josep Borrell, the European Union’s high representative for foreign affairs, said the escalation threatened regional security. He called for an “immediate cessation of hostilities, de-escalation and strict adherence to the cease-fire.”
 
The conflict between the two countries dates to the collapse of the Soviet Union. Nagorno-Karabakh, a region in Azerbaijan with a majority-Armenian population, broke away and declared independence, triggering a war that killed at least 20,000 and drove 1 million from their homes.
 
A cease-fire was declared in 1994, but the region remains volatile, with regular clashes along the border. Decades of peace talks mediated by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe have failed to resolve the conflict.
 
Firing and skirmishes on the border are common: The International Crisis Group has reported close to 300 incidents since 2015.
 
Tensions flared again in July when at least 16 soldiers were killed in clashes on the front line between Armenia and Azerbaijan, known as the Line of Contact.
 
At the time, Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry accused Armenia of shelling its positions at the Tovuz section of the border near Georgia. Armenia countered that Azerbaijan was conducting cross-border attacks.
 
Authorities in the mountainous Nagorno-Karabakh region said Sunday that Azerbaijan had shelled the capital, Stepanakert, and nearby settlements. Baku, which sees the region as its territory, accused Armenia of doing the shelling.
 
Artur Sargsyan, a defense official in the breakaway Nagorno-Karabakh region, said 16 of the region’s soldiers were killed in the fighting Sunday and more than 100 were wounded, Interfax news agency reported.
 
Vahram Poghosyan, a spokesman for the region, said the situation on the border with Azerbaijan was now “under control,” the agency reported.
 
Earlier, the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry claimed to have taken control of several villages in Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenian officials rejected the claim.
 
Turkey, which has cultural and economic ties with Azerbaijan, has voiced strong support for the country since the July clashes and offered to upgrade its defense capabilities. Turkey held military exercises with Azerbaijan last month.
 
Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar was quick to blame Armenia for the crisis Sunday. He warned that Armenia’s actions would “set the region on fire.”
 
Turkey and Armenia have no diplomatic ties.
 
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called on the global community to prevent Turkey from intervening in the crisis. He warned it would have “catastrophic consequences” for the region.
 
Kareem Fahim in Istanbul contributed to this report.