PROJECT ARMENIA: THE AWAKENING OF A NEW DEMOCRACY
by Anoosh Chakelian / 21 Feb 2013
Anoosh Chakelian examines the struggles of an emerging player in the
Caucasian circle as it takes its first steps into western markets
“When Russia sneezes, Armenia catches cold”. This was an Armenian
proverb often used to refer to the dominance of first the Russian
empire and then the USSR over the small Caucasian republic during
the previous two centuries, and how Russian incompetence and warring
would damage its hapless neighbour.
Ironically, today, it is the opposite. It is the success, rather
than the hazardous sternutations, of Armenia’s neighbours that is
one of the reasons its business relations with Britain, and the west
in general, are hampered. Namely Azerbaijan and Turkey, as today,
Armenia is firmly pro-Russian.
Armenia is landlocked, has a population of three million, and
lacks any significant variety of natural resources, but there is a
pressing feeling among the Armenian community and politicians both
east and west, that these traits are not its only obstacles to trade
and commerce.
The country’s fractious relationship with its neighbours is bad for
business. This is due to a bloody tangle of geopolitical history,
characterised on one side by Ottoman Turkey’s genocide of the Armenians
during World War I, and bitter wrangling with Azerbaijan over the
Nagorno-Karabakh territory on the other.
Both Turkey and Azerbaijan undoubtedly have more to offer the
west materially, in terms of diplomatic and financial interest –
respectively, a secular Islamic haven in the Middle East and a festival
of oil and natural gas.
Jonathan Aves has been the British ambassador to Armenia since January
last year, a job he shares, unusually, with his wife, Katherine Leach.
The couple alternate four months of work with four months off looking
after their children. This arrangement, and the fact the previous
ambassador married his Armenian press secretary, has reportedly led
to locals labelling their workplace “the love embassy.”
Aves admits that uncertain political relations can be a hindrance to
Armenia: “It’s still dealing with the legacy of 70 years of Soviet
rule, as well as the legacy and consequences of the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict and difficult relations with Turkey, so its two longest
external borders are closed. And then, if you want to pile on the
pain, while Armenia has pretty good relations with Iran, sanctions
to some extent do constrain it.”
But he is keen to emphasise that despite this difficult geographical
jigsaw it finds itself in, the republic has still developed its
economy at an impressive rate. He points out that preliminary figures
show Armenian GDP in 2012 rose by over seven per cent, recovering
rapidly from the global economic crisis, remarking upon the country’s
“economic dynamism”.
“Even within the constraints posed by the problems it faces
externally, there is a lot of potential here, and that potential
could be increased. Clearly, if its external border opened up with
Turkey, that would give a massive boost to Armenia’s economy, but
this shouldn’t prevent, and I don’t think is necessarily preventing,
companies from coming here and looking at opportunities.”
Indeed, despite Armenia’s rather wretched positioning in the Caucasus,
there seems to be a mood of optimism about its business relations
with Britain. Today, if you walk the streets of its strange capital
– Orthodox Christian opulence meets Soviet uniformity – you will
find Marks & Spencer, Debenhams, Next and HSBC, among many others,
displaying a bond between the two nations.
A handy M&S on the high street may be the noble legacy of such
ancient friendship as sparked by King Levon II of Cilician Armenia
fighting alongside Richard the Lionheart in the 12th century during
the Third Crusade.
For Armenia and Britain have a rich history of friendly relations, from
this 1191 siege, to Churchill famously using the word “Holocaust”
when referring to the Ottoman massacres of Armenians, to the
present day. Prince Charles hosted an Anglo-Armenian charity event
at Buckingham Palace in 2011, with 250 guests including royal family
members, business leaders and the Armenian prime minister. The next
major fundraising event for the project, called ‘Yerevan My Love’,
will take place in the Armenian capital in May this year. As the
patron of the charity, Prince Charles is expected to attend, the
first time he would visit Armenia.
If even the Prince of Wales is taking an interest in this often
overlooked member of the Caucasus, relations must be positive – but is
there anything tangible to be gained from such pleasantries? Dr Hratch
Tchilingirian, of the Associate Faculty at Oxford University’s Oriental
Institute, who organises these events, infers that Armenia’s status
as a Christian country interests the British royal, as well as its
architectural heritage. He gives me his own view of the relationship
between the two countries: “Yes, relations are friendly. Obviously,
Britain has much greater foreign policy interests in Azerbaijan and
Turkey than in Armenia. UK bilateral trade in goods with Azerbaijan
in 2012 in January to August have increased by 70 per cent compared
with 2011. Trade with Armenia is about $100m annually and only a
handful of British companies operate in Armenia. It is very obvious
where British priorities would be.
“What are the main drivers of British-Armenian foreign policy? It’s
difficult to say. I don’t see any concrete development of the
relationship.
“There is goodwill to grow and develop this positive relationship,
but both sides don’t know how, or in what areas, that would be.”
So is this goodwill purely symbolic, and therefore unlikely to open
Armenia up to the “concrete” area of economic growth via foreign
investment and exportation of its business?
Aves is quick to defend the Anglo-Armenian bond: “I wouldn’t
underestimate the goodwill. It’s great to have friends in this world.
I have had to deal with countries where, when you try to talk to
them about political co-operation with the UN, or whether you’re
just talking about common values like human rights and democracy,
you don’t get a very good hearing. But with our Armenian friends you
do get a very good hearing, on a basic level of common understanding
and shared values.”
He suggests that this is a good platform upon which to build a
bilateral relationship between the two states, albeit explaining that
commercial relations “are not at a very developed stage”, and lists
some areas where he sees real opportunity for Armenia and Britain,
including the spreading of British outlets and brands in Armenia,
pharmaceuticals and construction materials.
There is also the British-based mining company, Lydian International,
which has a large gold-mining project planned in Armenia; Aves and
others are keen to explore the potential of Armenia’s gold reserves
when forging Anglo-Armenian relations.
At the beginning of this year, Armenia abolished visa requirements
for EU citizens, which has therefore made it easier, and a more
attractive prospect, for British businesses to visit the country in
search of opportunities.
Bedo Eghiayan, an Armenian businessman who lives in London, owns a
pharmaceutical manufacturing company in Yerevan called PharmaTech,
which he started in 1995, and he describes how it has become easier
to do business in Armenia over the past 15 years, partly due to
its government.
“Now it’s pretty well organised, in very much the western way of doing
business – the legal strength does protect you. Before, there were
no company laws or regulations and banking was non-existent until
HSBC went there. Now it’s a very strong banking country.
“The government helps a lot, the laws are such that money transfers are
quite easy and there are no restrictions at all. Taxations are very
low. Slowly, organically, it’s opened up in the past 15, 16 years,
I suppose since it’s left Soviet Union. But I think major improvement
started since 2000.”
Eghiayan refers to Armenia’s advances in IT, and of course,
gold mining, as attractive prospects to Britain, as well as
pharmaceuticals. But it’s not all positive.
“The main obstacle is transportation,” he explains. “The government
needs to make exportation easy. We have grown as much as we can with
such a small population, but we need help to export.”
Again, it comes down to the frustration of closed borders. He explains
gloomily that the cost of transporting from England to Poti, a port
in Georgia (which he describes as Armenia’s “main bloodline”) is the
same as then transporting from Poti to Yerevan, which he says is only
about 250 miles from the port.
Aves explains that he is focusing mainly on Armenia internally, to
break down the existent layers of bureaucracy in order to make it
more attractive to foreign investors.
While within its borders, Armenia seems to be on track for growth,
global relations will make it a challenge to reach its potential,
because of its place on the Caucasian chessboard of socio-political
turmoil. Its unfortunate positioning is a sad irony for a country
that remains top of the world at chess.
http://www.totalpolitics.com/articles/364032/project-armenia-the-awakening-of-a-new-democracy.thtml