Sen. De Leon Plays Key Role In Success Of ANCA-WR Advocacy Day

SEN. DE LEON PLAYS KEY ROLE IN SUCCESS OF ANCA-WR ADVOCACY DAY

Thursday, April 10th, 2014

California State Senator Kevin de Leon speaks during ANCA-WR
Advocacy Day

SACRAMENTO–When more than 350 Armenian-American activists converged
on the California State Capitol in Sacramento on Monday, April 7 for
the ANCA Western Region’s 7th Annual Advocacy Day, their experience
was made all the more special due to the efforts of incoming Senate
President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon and his staff.

As preparations for this year’s Advocacy Day commenced several
months ago, the ANCA-WR decided to request that the annual resolution
recognizing the Armenian Genocide be more strongly worded than it had
been in previous years. This call to action was heeded by Senator de
Leon, who took on the responsibility of personally introducing the
resolution in the State Senate, all the while working closely with
the ANCA-WR. The result was SJR 21, which is one of the strongest
ArmenianGenocide resolutions ever adopted by a state legislative body.

The Senate session was opened with a moving invocation and prayer by
Father Vahan Gosdanian of Fresno’s Holy Trinity Armenian Apostolic
Church, followed by the flag presentation by the Santa Clara Homenetmen
Ani Scouts. As Senator de Leon rose to introduce the resolution,
he acknowledged the gallery full of Advocacy Day participants and
thanked the ANCA-WR for its presence and participation. In his remarks
urging support for SJR 21, Senator de Leon eloquently described
that the violence against the Armenians was inhumane, but “now they
would be made to bear a second inhumanity of violence against their
memory.” He proclaimed that “the Great State of California will not
let their history vanish and will not let their demand for justice
to go unheeded.”

Strong words of support were also voiced by Senator Ricardo Lara,
who also co-authored the resolution and chairs the Legislative Latino
Caucus, Senator Holly Mitchell as Chair of the California Legislative
Black Caucus, Senator Mark Wyland who described Turkish lobbyists as
“absolute deniers,” Senator Marty Block as Chair of the California
Legislative Jewish Caucus, Senator Carol Liu who represents a large
Armenian-American constituency, Senator Tom Berryhill who drew
parallels with displacement of Armenians during the Genocide and
now again in Kessab, and Senator Jim Nielsen who called for Genocide
education of California’s youth and justice for the Armenian people.

Glendale City Clerk Ardashes Kassakhian was invited by the ANCA-WR
to address the Senate on behalf of the community in support of the
resolution. He passionately called upon California’s political leaders
“to have the courage to speak truth to power” by recognizing the
Armenian Genocide and its present-day consequences, securing just
reparations for a crime that continues to be denied, and learning
the lessons of history as we face the current crisis in Kessab and
guard the future for generations to come.

At the end, a unanimous vote of 35-0 passed the resolution, as Senator
de Leon presented the ANCA-WR with a commemorative framed copy of it
for display.

“We’d like to thank Senator de Leon and his staff for the extraordinary
work he did to make sure that this annual event at the State Capitol
would be a success,” said ANCA-WR Executive Director Elen Asatryan. “In
particular, we’d like to acknowledge the assistance provided by his
deputy district director Baydsar Thomasian. She went above and beyond
the call of duty by also lending a hand with the organization of the
rotunda exhibit featuring Near East Relief efforts in California,
as well as the luncheon reception where several legislators were able
to interact with Advocacy Day participants in a more casual setting.”

ANCA-WR Chair Nora Hovsepian, Esq., echoed these sentiments, adding
that “the ANCA-WR is grateful to Senator Kevin de Leon for his
support and leadership on issues of concern to the Armenian-American
community. We look forward to continuing to work closely with him
as he assumes the role of Senate President Pro Tem not only on the
issue of the Armenian Genocide, but also in continuing efforts to
secure California’s recognition of the independence of the Republic
of Artsakh, securing mandates for Armenian Genocide education in
public schools, preparing for next year’s Genocide Centennial, and
acknowledging California’s contribution to the Near East Relief effort
which saved the Armenian Nation from total annihilation.”

http://asbarez.com/121738/sen-de-leon-plays-key-role-in-success-of-anca-wr-advocacy-day/

Walk Will Mark Armenian Genocide In 1915

WALK WILL MARK ARMENIAN GENOCIDE IN 1915

Sun Sentinel, Florida
April 8 2014

April 8, 2014|Staff report

A walkathon in Boca Raton will mark the 99th commemoration of the
Armenian Genocide of 1915. Event proceeds will go toward genocide
awareness, community outreach and advocacy for more genocide education
in Florida public schools.

The 2-mile walk will take place at 8:30 a.m. Saturday at Mizner Park.

It’s organized by the Armenian Genocide Commemoration Inc., a
nonprofit organization comprised of representatives from various
Armenian-American organizations and churches.

http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2014-04-08/news/fl-tophat-walkathon-armenia-20140408_1_armenian-genocide-genocide-awareness-mizner-park

Where To Look

WHERE TO LOOK

Republica, Kathmandu, Nepal
April 8 2014

BISHWESHWAR P BHANDARI

Transitional justice

The maxim nullum crimen sine lege (no crime without law) is a well
founded principle of criminal justice system. According to this
principle, an individual must know beforehand whether his acts are
lawful or liable to punishment. There was difficulty in bringing
leaders of Turkey to justice as their attempted extermination of
the Armenian people in 1915 could not be established due to lack of
consensus on the international legal status of the nature of crimes.

In 1919, at the end of WWI, a proposal to take criminal action against
the German Emperor Kaiser Wilhelm II and other collaborators involved
in crimes during the war was opposed by the US, which contended that
dealing with war crimes by international tribunals would violate the
principle of legality; that the laws would amount to ex post facto
laws since they had not been in existence before.

The principles of international criminal law recognized by the Charter
of the Nuremberg Tribunal no doubt had ex post facto character.

Nevertheless, in 1946 UN General Assembly unanimously adopted the
charter and the Judgments of the Tribunal. The seven principles that
came out of it were subsequently taken up by the International law
Commission (ILC) and accepted by the UN General Assembly in 1950. The
sixth Principle recognized following crimes under international
law: a) Crimes against Peace; b) War Crimes; and, c) Crimes against
Humanity. The Geneva Conventions (1949), Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of The Crime of Genocide (1948) and Convention Against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
(1984) have solidified themselves in the International Criminal
Law regime.

The International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
was established by Security Council on May 25, 1993 by exercising
its authority under Chapter VIII of the UN Charter in response to the
threat to peace in former Yugoslavia. It took primacy over national
courts. ICTY statute deals with crimes committed since January 1,
1991. Under this statute, grave breaches of Geneva Conventions of
1949, Violations of Laws of Customs of War and Genocide are liable
for prosecution.

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) was also set up
by UN Security Council in 1994, in response to atrocities committed
between Jan 1-Dec 31, 1994 in Rwanda and neighboring states targeting
the members of Tutsi ethnic group and their sympathizers. Under this
statute, crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and violations
of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions (1949) and Additional
Protocol II (1977) are liable for prosecution.

International Criminal Court (ICC), unlike ICTY and ICTR, is a
multilateral effort, therefore is binding only on the signatories to
the statute of the Court. It entered into force on July 1, 2002. The
crime of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of
aggression are regarded as international crimes under this statute.

The limitation of this statute is that it does not accept ex post
facto jurisdiction for the crimes committed before it came into force.

There are other categories of statutes that apply international
criminal law regime within national jurisdiction for past crimes.

Regulation No 2000/15 of United Nations Transitional Administration in
East Timor was created by UN Security Council, covering crimes between
January 1 and October 25, 1999. The Regulation has listed genocide,
crime against humanity, war crime, torture and sexual offence as
punishable. The Regulation now forms part of Timorese law as Section
163 of the Constitution of Timor-Leste has endorsed it.

Following the MoU between the United Nations and Royal Government of
Cambodia the statute for the ‘Establishment of Extra Ordinary Chambers
in the Courts of Cambodia to Prosecute Senior Leaders of Democratic
Kampuchea’ came into effect in 2000. This Law is designed to bring
Justice to those who committed serious violations of Cambodian and
international law between April 17, 1975 and January 6, 1979. The
crime of genocide, crime against humanity, and grave breaches of
Geneva Conventions are the categories of crime enlisted in the statute.

Similarly, following an agreement signed on January 16, 2002 between
the UN and the Government of Sierra Leone a statute came into effect
that established the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL). The statute
covers crimes committed since November 30, 1996 and during the civil
war. The crime against humanity, serious violation of international
humanitarian law, serious violations of Laws of Sierra Leone, crimes
prohibited by Art 3 common to Geneva Conventions and protocol II are
the categories of crimes enumerated in the statute.

In all situations mentioned above, the laws have been passed after
crimes were committed. Since war crimes, crimes against humanity,
genocide and aggression have been regarded as a part of customary
international law, their reception in national jurisdiction is only
reinstatement of existing laws. Therefore, if laws are enacted by
national legislature even after the occurrence of aforesaid crimes
legality is no more an issue.

The Nepali Legislature is at the final stage of enacting laws on truth
and reconciliation and on disappearance of the people during conflict.

The bills drafted in the past dealt mainly with the issue of truth and
reconciliation and the crime of disappearance, leaving other crimes
outside the purview of the draft. If we look into the nature of crimes
committed during insurgency by both state and non-state actors, most
serious of these were murder, disappearance, rape, torture, illegal
detention, forced recruitment of people into Maoist army, forced
displacement of people from their homes, and capture/destruction of
private and public property. The crimes committed during conflict were
widespread, systematic and targeted mostly against civilian population.

The very nature of these crimes constitutes crimes against humanity.

The recent Supreme Court decision in the case of Madhav Kumar Basnet
instructed the Government to draft two separate pieces of laws–one
for truth and reconciliation and one for disappearance. This is an
opportune moment to incorporate the whole gamut of crimes that took
place during the conflict period in Nepal. For this, reception of
contents of ICC Statute, the way it was done in East Timor (which
incorporates most of its provisions) may be one option. The other
option may be hewing close to the models in Cambodia and Sierra Leone.

A holistic approach has to be taken to cover the crimes committed
during conflict era. Particularly the crimes of murder, rape and
disappearance should be prosecuted.

http://www.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=72460

Turkey’s Very Own Sun King

TURKEY’S VERY OWN SUN KING

The Palestine Chronicle
April 7, 2014

By Jeremy Salt

Turkey is in a turbulent and uncertain state. Street demonstrations
are crushed with tear gas and water cannon. Protestors are killed
without one policeman being charged. A 15-year-old boy dying 269
days after being hit in the head by a tear gas canister is called a
member of a terrorist organization by the Prime Minister without him
providing a shred of evidence: of all the abusive remarks Erdogan has
ever made, this must rank as the most truly contemptible. Evidence of
massive corruption at the highest levels of government is followed
by the ‘reassignment’ of prosecutors and more than 10,000 police
in an apparent attempt to stifle investigations and destroy the
‘state within the state’ (the Gulen movement). Direct control of the
judiciary by the executive follows, along with the closing down of
Twitter and You Tube to stop the flow of surreptitiously recorded
conversations into the media. In one of the most recent leaks, the
possibility of a false flag operation on a supposedly sacred Ottoman
tomb in Syria is raised in conversation between the Foreign Minister,
the head of the national intelligence organization (MIT), the deputy
chief of the general staff and a senior Foreign Ministry official.

The MIT head, Hakan Fidan, offers to launch a missile attack and send
four men across the border to get things going.

Sitting atop this steaming pile of political ordure is the Turkish
Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s very own Sun King. His
face is everywhere and his fingerprints are on everything. He is the
government in this country. His supporters adore him. They roar their
approval no matter what he says. He rules by division, turning one
half of the country against the other and presenting himself as the
victim of terrorists, atheists, the state within the state, leftists,
marauders, holding companies and the interest rate lobby. Now we
have the cat lobby, cats being blamed for power failures during the
counting of votes after nationwide municipal elections held on March
30. As power failed in more than 40 cities, towns and villages,
the cats obviously organized themselves very well, sticking their
paws or tails into electricity grids power and causing one shortage
after another. Coincidentally, of course, electricity in all the
affected areas is supplied by companies close to the ruling Justice
and Development Party (AKP).

Reports came in from across the country of ballot papers being burnt,
of bundled up bags of ballot papers being found on rubbish dumps, of
one person signing a mass of ballot papers and of AKP officials being
inside polling stations while the votes were being counted. Thus,
the official 46 per cent received by the AKP cannot be regarded as
reliable. In some electorates the result was turned around after a
recount but in the national capital, where AKP incumbent mayor Melih
Gokcek officially received 44.7 per cent of the vote against 43.8
per cent for the CHP’s (Republican People’s Party) Mansur Yavas,
the head of the electoral body refused calls for a recount. Yavas
says he is certain of electoral fraud and has appealed.

In his election victory balcony speech, Erdogan warned his enemies
of his pending revenge. He also raised the question of Syria, which
he said ‘is at war with us’. This was a crude inversion of the truth
because it is Turkey, and specifically Erdogan, who is at war with
Syria. He had choices three years ago and it was his choice to prolong
the conflict in Syria by giving support to the armed groups in the
campaign being waged against the Syrian state and society as part of
the broader campaign against Iran by the collective calling itself
the Friends of the Syrian People. Arms have poured across the Turkish
border. The ‘refugee’ camps in Turkey teem with takfiri jihadis, free
to move between the camps and crossing the border to fight and kill
before returning to the food, blankets, heating and medicine provided
by local and international aid agencies. When wounded they are carried
back across the border and treated in Turkish clinics. Istanbul is a
junction for takfiris – terrorists as they would be defined in any
other circumstances by the governments supporting them – flying in
from across the world. They walk to the domestic terminal and take
the first plane to Antakya or Adana, where safe houses await them.

Erdogan is in this war up to his neck. As he is not a man who steps
back it can be assumed he is prepared to take it even further –
anything rather than admit defeat. Were the Turkish people aware of
what is going on, if they knew of the atrocities being committed by
these takfiri marauders, including massacres, beheading, pillaging and
the desecration of churches, they would not support this campaign but
the sad truth is that they do not know the truth. The media, largely
cowed and intimidated where it is not blatantly pro-government, has
never even tried to unearth the depth of Turkey’s involvement. Thus
when Erdogan says ‘Syria is at war with us’ and rattles on about
the slaps Turkey is going to give its enemies his supporters roar
their approval.

The most dangerous point along the Turkish-Syrian border right now is
the western corner of Hatay province around the town of Yayladagi and
the Sunni Muslim and Turkmen ‘refugee’ camps nearby. The Sunni Muslim
camp is one of the most extreme of the camps, a corner of Afghanistan
on the Turkish-Syrian border. The town and the camp teem with takfiri
jihadis. The Yayladagi region appears to have been the jumping off
point for the major offensive launched during the election campaign
against the largely Armenian town of Kassab. First stop was to smash
up the border post. Video shows armed men strolling across the border
from Turkey without one policeman, jandarma or soldier in sight to
stop them. A Turkish parliamentarian, Mehmet Ali Edipoglu, saw dozens
of Syrian-plate cars transporting terrorists – as he called them –
who were firing at the Kassab border post from the military road on
the Turkish side.

Pausing to scrawl ‘Allahu Akbar’ on the walls of the border post they
moved on to the key strategic communications position of Observatory
45 where an ecstatic henna-bearded Chechen was filmed praising God for
the victory. Then it was on to the town of Kassab where they desecrated
churches, pillaged apartments and smashed bottles of alcohol in the
streets. Turkey has denied Syrian charges of providing logistical
support and cover for the takfiris through tank and artillery fire
across the border. The shooting down of a Syrian plane attacking the
takfiris also took place during the first stages of the advance on
Kassab. Against the Turkish government’s claim that the plane was
inside Turkish air space when it was hit stands the fact that the
pilot ejected and landed far on the other side of the border.

If the plane had been hit while in Turkish air space the pilot would
have landed either in Turkey or just across the border where the
takfiris would have killed him as they did the pilot of a helicopter
shot down last September. There are no Syrian forces near the border
and the pilot had to land well away from it to survive.

Kassab is a picture postcard resort town set in hills overlooking
the Mediterranean. It is a beautiful spot and the combination of
an attack by fanatics allegedly backed by the Turkish government
is a nightmare for Armenians. Of the town’s 2000 population only a
remnant remain. The rest have sought refuge in nearby safe cities
or across the border in Lebanon. Kassab is only one example of the
damage wrought by the armed gangs but the fact that it is Armenian has
provoked outrage amongst Armenian communities around the world. Many
Armenians are now said to be flying into Syria to join the fight
against the armed groups. Against the claims of Turkish involvement
in the attack on Kassab, the offer by Ahmet Davutoglu of a refuge for
Armenians and the pictures of two elderly Armenian women transported
across the border by the kind gentlemen of Jabhat al Nusra to whom
they entrusted the keys of their house are grotesque.

Thwarted by the way Bashar al Assad has resisted all attempts to
destroy him, and defied his predictions three years ago that he would
soon be gone, Erdogan may take the Syria campaign a dangerous step
further. In the leaked conversation revealing consideration of a false
flag operation reference was made to John Kerry and his apparently
recent presentation of a detailed map for the establishment of a
‘no fly’ zone in Syria. Open military intervention is possibly more
likely because of US loss of face over the Ukraine. The Arab media
is reporting that the US has opened an air corridor from Jordan to
Antakya for the transit to the front line of large numbers of well-
trained takfiri fighters, many Chechens and Saudis. Operations across
the border near Yayladagi appear to be the opening of a new front
in Assad’s home province of Latakia. Out of weakness King Abdullah
of Jordan has had to do what he is told but in Erdogan the US has a
bullish partner who on many occasions has expressed his willingness
to go all the way if the US decides on direct intervention.

Recently the Turkish medical association issued a statement querying
Erdogan’s mental health. It is not surprising they should think this.

Erdogan’s behavior in recent years has become increasingly
authoritarian, belligerent, vindictive, and hubristic. His primary mode
of defence is attack. He rules by division. He divides black Turks
(the poor) from white Turks (the secularized urban middle class)
and blames the problems that have beset his government in the past
year on a host of enemies out to undermine Turkey by attacking him.

Among his hard core supporters it has worked. When he speaks
they roar their approval. What do they care about Twitter, You
Tube and Facebook? Many of them don’t even use the internet, just
like supporters of Erdogan’s blood brothers in Egypt, the Muslim
Brotherhood. When he says that the leaked conversation in which he
tells his son Bilal to get rid of the hundreds of millions of dollars
and euros stashed away in family houses is a montage they believe him.

The undermining of the institutions of the state don’t affect them
at all. Erdogan gives them roads, bridges and cheap housing and they
don’t seem to care about the rest. Housing is real. Justice is an
abstract. Erdogan is their man – their lion – and they urge him not
to bow down.

In any other country calling itself a democracy any one of the crises
and scandals engulfing Turkey in the past year would have seen the
government out of office within 24 hours. It would have been shamed
into resigning by the pressure of public opinion or it would have been
forced to resign through the use of a constitutional mechanism. In
Turkey those who were ashamed have already resigned from the AKP
parliamentary party or branches but they were few in number and the
rest are sticking with the vote-winning Erdogan even though he has
divided the country beyond any possibility of repair as long as he
stays in office. According to AKP rules, having served three terms
in parliament, he must stand down as Prime Minister this year. He
can always change the rules and stay on or – perhaps more likely –
he will run for the presidency.

Erdogan has succeeded in wrenching Turkey from its traditional
moorings. This is a mighty achievement but whereas Ataturk set the
country on the path of modernization based on science and reason,
Erdogan is driving it deeper into a reactionary religious future in
which his ‘pious generations’ will have prevailed. Man’s fate will not
be decided rationally by man (or woman) but by the unpredictable whims
of invisible entities flying around the celestial sphere with wings
on their shoulders. While the people concentrate on the afterlife,
the politicians and the businessmen will look after their interests
in this one.

Erdogan has sponsored a war on Syria that has caused immense
destruction and loss of life, which, of course, true to form, he blames
on someone else, Bashar al Assad. He has turned the southeastern region
of his country into a mustering ground for armed men whose life view
is death-based. Some are mercenaries and some are plain religious
fanatics. Some are deluded young men led astray by self-described
sheikhs who defame Islam with every word they speak and some are
plain psychopaths but in the dirty business of destroying Syria they
are in combination perfectly suited to the task at hand.

There is not a ‘moderate’ amongst them. In any other circumstances the
governments of the US, France, Britain and Turkey would not hesitate
to call them terrorists. When active on their own soil or threatening
their own interests, they do.

If the US asks Erdogan to step up to the plate and turn his country
into a launching pad for a direct military attack on Syria behind the
cover of a ‘no fly’ zone or a ‘humanitarian corridor’ he has indicated
many times before that he will do it. Whatever he does inside his own
country is one thing, but beyond Turkey’s borders, Erdogan competes
with Benyamin Netanyahu for the title of most dangerous man in the
Middle East.

– Jeremy Salt is an associate professor of Middle Eastern history and
politics at Bilkent University in Ankara, Turkey. He contributed this
article to PalestineChronicle.com.

To What Extent Are The Activities Of The Government Of Armenia In Co

TO WHAT EXTENT ARE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ARMENIA IN COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN GOVERNANCE?

April 9 2014 In 2011,

Armenia became a member of the Open Government Partnership (OGP)
initiative. The basic purpose of the OGP, which was founded by eight
countries: the United States, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Norway,
Philippines, South Africa and the United Kingdom, was the formation
of a transparent and accountable government with a large-scale
public participation in the public life. Currently 63 countries are
participating in this initiative. In the framework of this partnership,
Armenia had 2012-2013 action plan, which provided for numerous events
for ensuring governance transparency and openness.

Today, the civil society, which is the most important part of the
open governance, in the face of the “Asparez” Journalists Club,
Counterpart International, and “Partnership for Open Society”
initiative, had organized a discussion regarding the involvement
of OGP in Armenia, the Implementation of 2012-2013 Action Plan in
the framework of OGP, and 2014-2016 projects. The expert of the
Freedom of Information Center of Armenia Liana Doydoyan presented
the principles of OGP, spoke about the guideline of OGP program,
and Artak Kyurumyan presented the independent assessment of 2012-2013
Action Plan of OGP in Armenia. According to this assessment, the seven
out of 15 commitments in the national action plan was in compliance
with OGP values and the eight of them is substantially or completely
implemented. The budget transparency, according to the 4 score scale,
was rated 0, the freedom of information was rated 2 (the law operates,
however, the information is not always accessible), publication of
declarations was rated 3, because only the properties of selected
officials was declared, and the public participation was rated 3.

After the discussion was over, Aravot.am talked to the Deputy Director
for Programs of the “Open Society Foundations-Armenia” David Amiryan.

Recalling that as an evidence of transparent practice, our government
is constantly bringing the example of e-gov.am site, saying that
there is no such an unprecedented thing in many developed countries,
when all government decisions and budget is fully placed in the website
accessible to everyone, when you can follow the process of your formal
application, etc., we asked whether our government is open. “Literally
translating the Open Government Partnership from English it should be
an open government partnership; the idea of the program is to ensure
the openness of the governance of the country with civil society
partnership. Its philosophy is based on several values, one of which
is freedom and access to information. Our government takes in and
says that I have created an e-gov, but it’s not enough. The access
to the information is not that the information is placed somewhere,
in the depths of the Internet, it should be perceptible for any
person. Maybe it’s a wonderful thing for narrow specialists, but it
does not mean an open government partnership. The civil society, when
submitting recommendations to the government as a partner, they are
much more radical steps and are aimed at solving some problem quickly
and immediately. For example, in 2012-13 Action Plan, Levon Barseghyan
(Chairman of “Asparez” club) had sent recommendations of 15-17 pages,
none of which was adopted. Or, they say that we have introduced an
e-procurement system. The e-procurement system no way affects the
e-procurement-related big issues that are available. In one report,
it was noted that last year 70 % of procurement were procurements
made from one source in rapid procedure. Well, no matter what you call
it: electronic or not, the problem is not solved. There is a similar
problem with perception of phenomena between the civil society and
the government. In addition, OGP implies the commitment for the
implementation of activities over the government, the government
should demonstrate that it seeks to be open and become transparent,
but what is often done, an NGO is implementing a program, in which the
government is the beneficiary, and the government marks a “plus” next
to it that it had done it. But, the government itself should implement
programs.” To our question of how you will score the 2012-13 Action
Plan of the Open Government Partnership based on the conclusion of
estimates by the independent appraiser, David Amirian said, “I would
score 2. The openness off the government must be directed to the
public. Does any citizen feel its openness? Do people feel? I do not
think so. The independent appraiser had taken the value, which was
defined by OGP, he has also taken the activities of the Government
of Armenia under this value and had scored whether the activity
corresponds the value, whether there are results, whether it should
be continued, etc… And when you look at the report point by point,
it appears that there are major problems: the steps performed do not
match the values, they had not achieved result, and so on.”

Interestingly, no one from the government attended the discussion of
this issue. To inform also that the same values were defined by other
63 countries joining the OGP, the same format, the government assumes
the same commitments and the independent appraisers are evaluating
the Action Plans of the government of those countries by the same
standards. After all, all of these will be placed on international
platform for general assessment, a rating list will be made. “They do
not have any mechanism for pressure. Perhaps, only the score given
to you, your rating will be some “pressure”. But, the openness and
closeness of your government is your problem, the problem of your
government. They have said that we have such an initiative, those
who want may join, we will provide the values and ideas, you implement.

We, our government, has joined in its own, and the civil society as
part of this initiative says the government, if you had gone and have
joined, let’s do it correctly, in good and complete form, in compliance
with the values, in consistent to the idea, and not for formality.”

Melania BARSEGHYAN

Read more at:

http://en.aravot.am/2014/04/09/164588/

Professor Seifalian Creates Nose And Ear Using Stem Cells

PROFESSOR SEIFALIAN CREATES NOSE AND EAR USING STEM CELLS

April 8, 21:23

Scientists in a north London hospital are growing ears, noses and
blood vessels in the laboratory attempting to make body parts with
the help of stem cells.

While only a handful of patients have received the British lab-made
organs so far- including tear ducts, blood vessels and windpipes –
researchers hope they will soon be able to transplant more types of
body parts into patients, including what would be the world’s first
nose made partly from stem cells, reports Newsmax Health.

“It’s like making a cake,” said Alexander Seifalian at University
College London, the scientist leading the effort. “We just use a
different kind of oven.”

During a recent visit to his lab, Seifalian showed off a sophisticated
machine used to make molds from a polymer material for various organs.

Last year, he and his team made a nose for a British man who lost his
to cancer. Scientists added a salt and sugar solution to the mold of
the nose to mimic the somewhat sponge-like texture of the real thing.

Stem cells were taken from the patient’s fat and grown in the lab
for two weeks before being used to cover the nose scaffold. Later,
the nose was implanted into the man’s forearm so that skin would grow
to cover it.

Seifalian said he and his team are waiting for approval from regulatory
authorities to transfer the nose onto the patient’s face but couldn’t
say when that might happen.

Later this year, a trial is scheduled to start in India and London
to test lab-made ears for people born without them.

The potential applications of lab-made organs appear so promising
even the city of London is getting involved: Seifalian’s work is
being showcased on Tuesday as Mayor Boris Johnson announces a new
initiative to attract investment to Britain’s health and science
sectors so spin-off companies can spur commercial development of the
pioneering research.

The polymer material Seifalian uses for his organ scaffolds has been
patented and he’s also applied for patents for their blood vessels,
tear ducts and windpipe.

Seifalian estimated about 10 million pounds ($16 million) has gone
into his research since 2005 but said he hoped lab-made organs would
one day be available for a few hundred dollars.

http://med.news.am/eng/news/1469/professor-seifalian-creates-nose-and-ear-using-stem-cells.html

ANCA WR Leadership Meets With Calif. Speaker Perez

ANCA WR LEADERSHIP MEETS WITH CALIF. SPEAKER PEREZ

Tuesday, April 8th, 2014

ANCA WR leadership with California Assembly Speaker John Perez

SACRAMENTO–Following the unanimous passage of the Armenian Genocide
resolution authored and introduced by California Assembly Speaker John
Perez, leaders of the Armenian National Committee of America-Western
Region held a private meeting with the Speaker to thank him for his
leadership and support and to discuss issues of importance to the
Armenian-American community.

At the front seat of topics discussed were ongoing effort to
secure recognition of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) by the
California legislature, the recent attacks facilitated by Turkey
resulting in displacement of Armenians in Kessab, Syria, as well
as the organization’s centennial project “America, We Thank You”
highlighting the massive relief efforts made by the United States
during the Armenian Genocide through the Near East Relief.

“We are extremely grateful to Speaker Perez who was so moved by the
experience of his legislative trip to Armenia with the ANCA-WR last
fall, that he highlighted the authority of his office by personally
introducing the Armenian Genocide resolution this year. We were also
gratified to be able to meet privately with the Speaker once again
for our ongoing discussions about the current situations our brethren
face in Artsakh and in Kessab, and we look forward to his continued
leadership on issues of concern to California’s large Armenian-American
constituency,” stated ANCA WR Chair Nora Hovsepian.

http://asbarez.com/121608/anca-wr-leadership-meets-with-calif-speaker-perez/

UN: Residents Of Entire Villages Such As Kessab Have Been Forced To

UN: RESIDENTS OF ENTIRE VILLAGES SUCH AS KESSAB HAVE BEEN FORCED TO FLEE

April 08, 2014 | 15:00

United Nations Security General Ban Ki-moon demands parties to Syrian
conflict to ensure that civilians are protected.

Spokesperson for the Secretary General released the following
statement:

“In the face of troubling new reports of atrocities in the brutal
conflict driving Syria to its destruction, the Secretary-General
demands that warring parties and their supporters ensure that
civilians are protected, regardless of their religion, community or
ethnic affiliation.

Both the Syrian government and armed groups have the legal obligation
and moral responsibility to do so. They must do everything to avoid
and prevent violence against civilians, including indiscriminate
shelling and air attacks on civilian areas.

The killing of an elderly priest, Father Frans van der Lugt, in
Homs today is but the latest tragedy highlighting the urgent need
to protect civilians. The Secretary-General condemns this inhumane
act of violence against a man who heroically stood by the people of
Syria amid sieges and growing difficulties.

The Secretary-General is also horrified by the gruesome images
purporting executions in the Syrian town of Kassab. While the United
Nations is unable to confirm the validity of these reported atrocities,
gross human rights violations undeniably continue and residents of
entire villages such as Kassab have been forced to flee.

Government forces continue to indiscriminately destroy whole
neighbourhoods, burying entire families beneath the rubble of their
homes. The Secretary-General is also extremely concerned that groups
listed as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security
Council continue to brutalize the civilian population.

There is a belief by too many in Syria and beyond that this conflict
can be won militarily. More violence will only bring more suffering and
instability to Syria and sow chaos in the region. The Secretary-General
again urges all Syrians and their outside supporters to put a stop to
this conflict, now. For the sake of families and communities across
Syria, the Secretary-General appeals to all sides to permit immediately
the unfettered access of humanitarian assistance and workers.

Under the Secretary-General’s leadership, the United Nations is
prepared to contribute to a new day in Syria by fostering a political
settlement, providing humanitarian assistance, and supporting
reconstruction.”

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Armenian Government Must Collaborate With Civil Society – Opinion

ARMENIAN GOVERNMENT MUST COLLABORATE WITH CIVIL SOCIETY – OPINION

16:38 * 08.04.14

The Armenian government does not seem very much interested in involving
the civil society’s potential in its work, according to David Amiryan,
a deputy director of the Civil Society Foundations – Armenia.

Introducing the outcomes of the mission’s country project on Tuesday,
Amiryan said he thinks that the Government must make its activities
more transparent with the help of civil society representatives.

“The civil society is trying – with the help of different organizations
– to have its participation in the open governance process, but the
results we have are not reassuring, to say the least,” he noted.

Amiryan attributed the problem to the differing perceptions of the
society’s values by the government, and the civil society.

“The accessibility of information is a value. But I, as a citizen,
should not have to apply to the government to receive information, it
has to provide me with that information to make it not only accessible
but also transparent,” he added.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Armenian President Invites Turkmenistan’s President To Visit Yerevan

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT INVITES TURKMENISTAN’S PRESIDENT TO VISIT YEREVAN

Tuesday,
April
08

The Armenian and Turkmen delegations signed a number of documents
on the development and deepening of cooperation between the two
countries. Prior to that, talks of Presidents Serzh Sargsyan and
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov and an enlarged meeting of the delegations
took place.

Following the talks, the sides signed a joint statement, which says
in particular that Armenian-Turkmen cooperation has achieved notable
results, the Armenian president’s press service reports.

The two presidents indicated the similarity or concurrence of their
positions on the main issues of international politics and confirmed
their intention to intensify cooperation on the international arena.

The presidents reasserted their readiness to strengthen cooperation
in the fight against terrorism, drug trafficking, illegal migration,
transnational organized crime, and arms trafficking.

The statement notes that the Armenian president invited the Turkmen
president to visit Yerevan on a date convenient to him. The invitation
was accepted, and the visit date will be specified via diplomatic
channels.

http://www.aysor.am/en/news/2014/04/08/serzh-sargsyan/