Aronian Keeps Lead At Grand Slam Final Masters

ARONIAN KEEPS LEAD AT GRAND SLAM FINAL MASTERS

PanARMENIAN.Net
September 27, 2011 – 11:01 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenian grandmaster Levon Aronian celebrated a
victory over Francisco Vallejo Pons in round 1 of Sao Paulo Grand
Slam Final Masters to top the tournament standings with 3 points.

In the other matches, Hukaru Nakamura (U.S.) and Vasili Ivanchuk
(Ukraine), Viswanathan Anand (India) and Magnus Carlsen (Norway)
played in a draw and gained 1 point each.

In round 2, Aronian will face Carlsen.

The Grand Slam 2011 is a double round robin with 6 players. The first
rounds of the event are played in Sao Paulo and the second part will
be in Alhóndiga Bilbao.

Armenian MP Advises Azerbaijan Against Criticizing Armenia

ARMENIAN MP ADVISES AZERBAIJAN AGAINST CRITICIZING ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
September 27, 2011 – 09:14 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Azerbaijan can nothing but attempt to bring
the speech by Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan in the UN General
Assembly to discussion in other international structures, a member
of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia (RPA) said.

“History has proved that discussing each phrase uttered by Armenian
officials, Azeris could never find proper arguments,” Hovhannes
Sahakyan said when commenting on the recent statement by an Azerbaijani
delegation to Euronest, Asim Mollazade, who claimed that the Armenian
President’s speech was an “infringement of legal norms” and wished
to discuss it during the Euronest session.

“It’s a pity that the Azerbaijan has so far failed to understand
the meaning of Euronest, which has not been created as a rostrum for
political problems and conflicts,” Sahakyan said.

“I would advise Azerbaijani politicians to remember their own leader’s
statements and events in their own country before criticizing Armenia,”
he concluded.

Serzh Sargsyan’s Mood

SERZH SARGSYAN’S MOOD
Naira Hayrumyan

Lragir.am News

12:06:37 – 27/09/2011

In the discussions on the recent developments in Russia and their
possible influence on the domestic policy of Armenia, experts
mainly juxtapose Putin and Kocharyan. In addition, no parallels are
drawn between Medvedev and Sargsyan. However, the question whether
Sargsyan will be as easy as Medvedev to call on the Republican Party
to nominate Kocharyan for the presidential election may turn out to
be an important factor.

Medvedev and Putin announced they had agreed on such a scenario
earlier in 2007. Is there a similar agreement between Kocharyan and
Sargsyan? What did they speak about on March 1, 2008 when Kocharyan
imposed a state of emergency? How many terms did Kocharyan assign to
Sargsyan, one or two?

Experts think there is little common between Sargsyan and Medvedev,
Sargsyan is ready to turn to the West for support, and is not likely
to cede to Kocharyan as easily as Medvedev. In the past 3.5 years,
despite regular press reports on controversies between Kocharyan
and Sargsyan, and the Armenian politicians, according to WikiLeaks,
talked to the U.S. officials about these controversies, Serzh Sargsyan
never uttered a bitter word against Kocharyan.

In case of a real controversy, Sargsyan would use all the ~Sdiscreet~T
means to deprive Kocharyan of even the possibility to return. After
all, March 1 is still open, together with a great deal of other
things which Serzh Sargsyan could use against Kocharyan. The fact
that he did not do is evidence to an agreement between them rather
than friendship or reluctance to defame his ex-boss.

However, this is just another supposition, just like the fact that in
Armenia Putin will promote Kocharyan. However, the fact that Medvedev
gave away the scramble for power with a smile of joy is evidence
that Serzh Sargsyan may also state to refuse it one day. It is in
the context of the home political developments of Armenia.

The opposition demands snap elections by the end of this year,
Serzh Sargsyan leaves for the West and does not get a high-ranking
reception, the IMF does not announce debt restructuring for Armenia,
so it is possible that Serzh Sargsyan may return and resign or state
reluctant to run for a second term.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/country23517.html

Shavarsh Kocharyan: The Mediator Is Appointed With Agreement Of Part

SHAVARSH KOCHARYAN: THE MEDIATOR IS APPOINTED WITH AGREEMENT OF PARTIES: TURKEY HAS APPLIED NEITHER TO NK NOR TO ARMENIA

ARMENPRESS
SEPTEMBER 26, 2011
YEREVAN

“The mediator is appointed with the agreement of parties. As far as I
know Turkey has applied neither to Nagorno Karabakh nor to Armenia,”
RA Deputy Foreign Minister Shavarsh Kocharyan told Armenpress,
commenting on Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmed Davutoglu’s statement
made August 24 in New York.

To remind, Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoglu stated that his country
is ready to support Karabakh conflict settlement. He also mentioned
that Turkey is ready to be a mediator in Karabakh conflict settlement.

Baku Faces Difficult Choice Between Turkey And Israel

BAKU FACES DIFFICULT CHOICE BETWEEN TURKEY AND ISRAEL
by Shahin Abbasov

EurasiaNet.org
Sept 26 2011
NY

Policymakers in Azerbaijan are facing a dilemma: can an enemy of a
friend be a friend? Specifically, can Baku maintain cordial relations
with both Turkey and Israel at the same time?

Signs are emerging that Baku is facing pressure to make a public
choice between Turkey, its most important strategic ally, and Israel,
with whom Azerbaijan in recent years has developed close diplomatic,
economic and military ties.

Turkish-Israeli ties nosedived after nine Turkish citizens died during
a 2010 Israeli attack on an aid boat traveling to the blockaded
Palestinian city of Gaza. Since then, both countries have recalled
their ambassadors, and Turkey has expressed support for recognition
of United Nations membership for Palestine. To repair what were once
friendly relations with Jerusalem, Ankara has demanded a full apology
from Israel for the 2010 attack and the end of its embargo on Gaza.

Now, Turkey is turning to its longtime strategic ally, Azerbaijan,
for support on that front. In a September 19 interview with the
government-friendly ANS TV, Turkish Ambassador Khulusi Kylych called on
“brother Azerbaijan” to “reconsider its relations with this country,”
referring to Israel.

“This issue concerns every citizen of Turkey and it should be reflected
in [Azerbaijani-Israeli] relations,” Kylych asserted. Just as Turkey
closed its borders with Armenia in 1991 to support Azerbaijan during
its war with Yerevan over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, so
Baku, in effect, now should sever close ties with Israel, he continued.

But that request is more easily made than met.

Azerbaijan is one of the few Muslim countries with relatively extensive
ties with Israel, including the co-production and sale of military
equipment. Israel also ranks as the second largest importer of
Azerbaijani oil (after Italy), taking in 6.5 million tons per year –
an amount that accounts for roughly 30 percent of Israel’s oil needs,
according to Azerbaijani government statistics.

Kylych touched on that link, hinting at the possibility that Turkey
could bring pressure to bear on Israel’s oil supplies via the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline. “We know about the Azerbaijani oil
transit to Israel via the Turkish [port of] Ceyhan,” he said. “Israel
should think about it.”

Baku may well be thinking about it, too — and, beyond that,
to Turkey’s role as a trade avenue to the West, via Georgia, for
Azerbaijani oil, gas and other goods. Disagreements over the transit
of Azerbaijani gas already mar relations with Ankara; conceivably,
scant interest exists for Israel to become another sore point.

Commenting to EurasiaNet.org about Ambassador Kylych’s interview,
Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry spokesperson Elman Abdullayev stuck to the
diplomatic and obvious. “Turkey and Azerbaijan are brotherly nations,”
he observed. “Turkey is one of the strongest countries in the region
and has an influence on regional processes.” Officials have made no
other comments.

Israel has made its position known. In a September 17 interview with
ANS TV, Israeli Ambassador Michael Lavon-Lotem argued that Azerbaijan
and Israel’s close ties “cannot be the basis for a third country’s
interests.”

Unlike Azerbaijan’s southern neighbor, Iran, which also has pushed
Baku to back away from Israel, Turkey, which shares deep cultural
ties with Azerbaijan, could prove more difficult to ignore.

Analyst Leyla Aliyeva, president of the Center for National and
International Studies, a Baku think-tank, believes that Baku simply
will try to avoid situations in which it would be required to choose
between Turkey and Israel. “Baku will be trying to keep the status
quo of its relations with both countries,” Aliyeva said.

If it manages to preserve that status quo, some see a chance for
Azerbaijan to act as a mediator between Turkey and Israel. “Israel
should soften its position [on aid to Gaza] and Azerbaijan should
very diplomatically explain to Tel Aviv that its position is wrong,”
independent MP Musa Gasimly told the SalamNews agency. “Because a
further escalation will harm all sides.”

So far, Azerbaijani opposition leaders have strongly supported Turkey
in its war of words with Israel. A September 16 statement from the
Public Chamber, a grouping of the country’s largest opposition parties,
asserted that “Turkey is right” for reducing its ties with Jerusalem
after the Mavi Marmara incident.

But pro-government analyst Mubariz Akhmedoglu, head of the Center for
Political Innovations, doubts that Baku will follow Ankara’s wishes.

“If Azerbaijan supports Turkey on this issue, it could only harm
Turkish-Israeli relations” by fueling Israeli anger, Akhmedoglu said.

Akhmedoglu reasons that the dispute between Ankara and Jerusalem
is just a battle for influence in the Middle East. “We should not
interfere. . . . At any time, Ankara could normalize relations with
Israel. And where would that leave Azerbaijan?”

Such a difference of opinions only emphasizes the difficult choice that
faces Baku, said Elhan Shahinoglu, director of Baku’s Atlas research
center. “Our government is in a tough situation,” Shahinoglu said.

Editor’s note: Shahin Abbasov is a freelance reporter based in Baku and
a board member of the Open Society Assistance Foundation-Azerbaijan.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/63628
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/64224

International Ecology Symposium In Yerevan

INTERNATIONAL ECOLOGY SYMPOSIUM IN YEREVAN

news.am
Sept 26 2011
Armenia

YEREVAN. – A 3-day international symposium, entitled “Geoecological
Monitoring and Risk of Administrative Region,” will get underway on
Tuesday at State Engineering University of Armenia. The event will
bring together 56 scientists from 17 countries.

The symposium is organized by the CSTO (Collective Security Treaty
Organization) Institute, Youth Foundation of Armenia, State Engineering
University of Armenia, and Gegharkunik Regional Administration. Topic
of the event is of particular importance for Armenia, since the country
has several environmental problems. The discussants will examine a
number of topics including the current state of Armenia’s Lake Sevan’s
water basin, human-influenced ecological changes in water resources,
risk assessment models for chemical and technological objects, and
prevention of lakes’ and reservoirs’ radioactive contamination in
case of major accidents.

Business activity’s consequences and dangers on the geological
environment will be among the topics underscored during the symposium.

The event’s Armenian and foreign specialists will deliver in excess of
50 scientific reports, and the best ones will be published in American
chemical technology and Romanian environment protection magazines,
and also in the herald of the Engineering Academy of Armenia. Along
the lines of the symposium, the participants will also visit Lake
Sevan and the salt marshlands of Ararat Valley, Youth Foundation of
Armenia Press Service informed Armenian News-NEWS.am.

The Civil War’s Only Armenian Soldier To Be Honored

THE CIVIL WAR’S ONLY ARMENIAN SOLDIER TO BE HONORED
by Martha M. Boltz

The Civil War
Tuesday, September 20, 2011

A special dedication with a new tombstone from proud Aremenia-Americans
will be held on October 1.

VIENNA, Va., September 20, 2011 – The only known Armenian to have
served in the Civil War, Khachadour Paul Garabedian, is being
recognized with a new grave marker in a Philadelphia cemetery on
Saturday, October 1, thanks to an anonymous $10,000 donation and the
dedication of fellow Armenian-Americans.

Garabedian was born in the small town of Rodosto near Constantinople
(now known as Istanbul) in Turkey, on August 25, 1836, and immigrated
to Lowell, Mass. in the late 1850s. There he worked as a machinist
and became an American citizen.

In 1864 at the age of 28, he enlisted in the Union Navy. Engineers
were in demand at the time, and his years of working in the mills in
Massachusetts made him a desirable recruit. He enlisted as a Third
Assistant Engineer, holding officer rank, and served upon two ships,
the USS Geranium and the USS Grand Gulf, both blockade ships, deployed
to cover Southern ports along the Atlantic Coast and later on in the
Gulf of Mexico.

Garabedian’s letter of appointment was reported in the Lowell Daily
Citizen & News of August 11, 1864, part of which said:

“We record this appointment with pleasure. The young gentleman is
an Armenian by birth, but has become not only naturalized, but is
thoroughly indoctrinated in liberal and loyal principles. We have no
doubt at all that he will acquit himself honorably and usefully in
the position assigned him.”

The USS Grand Gulf, on which Garabedian primarily served, had a
steam engine and was screw propelled. With a top speed of 11.5 knots,
armed with one 100-pounder, two 30-pounders, and three 8-inch guns,
it was highly effective as a blockader. She was credited with sinking
a number of blockade-runners along the coast.

First Armenian in Philadelphia

There are no other details available regarding his service, and
Garabedian was finally discharged in August of 1865 in Philadelphia,
remaining there for the rest of his life and becoming the first
Armenian in the City of Brotherly Love.

His engineering abilities were obvious in 1868 when he filed for a
patent with the US Commissioner of Patents for a Pipe Coupling.

Garabedian married Hannah Matilda “Tillie” Wynkoop in Philadelphia on
June 18, 1871, at the Church of the Messiah. Daughter of a prominent
Philadelphia family, Tillie’s brother had died at Andersonville
Prison during the Civil War. The Garabedians had no children, and
Garabedian died at only 45 years old on August 25, 1881, apparently
of tuberculosis, which he may have contracted years before during
the war. He is buried in Fernwood Cemetery in southwest Philadelphia.

Original Marker Is Gone

An Armenian, Paul Sookiasian, of West Chester, Penn., researching
Garabedian’s early life learned that the original grave marker had
basically disintegrated sometime in the 1950s, leaving the brave
Armenian with his singular contribution to the Civil War in an unmarked
grave. Initially, Gary Koltokian of Chelmsford, Mass. had brought
the story to his attention, doing the early research in governmental
archives and other sources in Lowell, Mass. and learning that the
Armenian sailor’s grave no longer had a marker. Mr. Koltookian’s
efforts began the idea of a new marker which will achieve success on
October 1.

That was “the reason we needed a gravestone for Garabedian,”
said Sookiasian, who then brought the story to the Philadelphia
Armenian-American Veterans Association.

Sookiasian explained that the group “felt that a traditional
‘khatchkar’ or Armenian cross-stone would be an ideal replacement,”
but fund raising continued slowly until an anonymous donor heard of
the project and sent the PAAVA a check for $10,000.00.

Continuing the Armenian participation, the artist who designed the
khatchkar was Leo Hanian, an ethnic Armenian who fled from massacres
against Armenians in Baku, Azerbaijan at the end of the Soviet era.

He later settled in Philadelphia where he made stone crosses for
churches as well.

Marker Tells Garabedian’s Life Story

USS Grand Gulf, blockade breaker

And what a marker it is! Made of Indian black granite, showing the
ornate Cross, it carries Garabedian’s name and dates of birth and
death. The two spire images at the top flanking the cross reflect his
two countries: that of Independence Hall for Philadelphia, Pa. on the
right, and the spire of the Cathedral of Holy Etchmiadzin in Armenia,
on the left.

The lower panel or base reveals his life story. The USS Grand Gulf
on which he served is portrayed with a Civil War era American flag
above it.

Haike Giragosian, an Armenian friend who lives in the Richmond, Va.

area, said that he “felt very proud that this fellow Armenian served
in the Union Navy.” Giragosian, who served in World War II as a
submariner, then continued,”He did not come here seeking benefits;
instead, in return for a good life, he chose to lay down his life
for his adopted country, if needed, because he had become an American.”

Current plans are for the rededication ceremony to be held at noon
on Saturday, October 1 at the Fernwood Cemetery, and will include
a traditional Armenian grave blessing service performed jointly
by priests from the five Philadelphia area Armenian Churches. At
some point in the ceremony, Khachadour Paul Garabedian’s uniquely
Armenian-American story will be told.

The ceremony is open to the public and all are invited to
attend. For additional information, Paul Sookiasian may be reached
at [email protected] or by phone at 610-812-8368.

My thanks to Paul Sookiasian for taking the photograph of the
Garabedian marker.

Follow the blog on Face Book and LinkedIn at Martha Boltz; my email
is [email protected]. Read more of Martha’s columns on The Civil
War at the Communities at the Washington Times.

vil-wars-only-armenian-soldier-be-honored/

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/civil-war/2011/sep/20/ci

Sports: Dmitry Pirog Stops Martirosyan, Retains in Ten Rounds

BoxingScene.com
Sept 25 2011

Dmitry Pirog Stops Martirosyan, Retains in Ten Rounds

By Alexey Sukachev

Krasnodar, Russia – WBO middleweight champion Dmitry Pirog (19-0, 15
KOs) retained his title with a tenth round stoppage of mandatory
challenger Gennady Martirosyan (22-3, 11 KOs). It was a thrilling but
ultimately one-sided fight, and the first ever all-Russian title
encounter in boxing history. The challenger’s corner rejected
Gennady’s vicitmization by waving off the fight off after the end of
the tenth round. Martirosyan, depsite his sad ending, never went down
and has every right to be proud of his performance. Pirog further
solidified his claim of being an elite middleweight .

Notably for the sceptics, Armenia-born but St. Petersburg-based
Martirosyan entered the ring under the Russian flag, and so did Pirog.
Martirosyan, a crude stocky slugger with limited power but limitless
character and will, was Pirog’s mandatory before more compelling
fights could be made under the WBO aegis.

The fight was as one-sided as one could probably anticipate.
Short-handed Martirosyan was in Pirog’s range of fire and couldn’t
avoid being hit by mulitple combinations. Pirog mixed in uppercuts
with multiple jabs to the face of the challenger and with hooks to
both head and body of Martirosyan, who had a long and painful night
ahead of him.

One punch after another, Martirosyan was slowly being degraded to the
state of journeyman. The champion was an entirely different boxer than
what he appeared to be in his last outing, a lackluster performance
against Javier Francisco Maciel in March. Pirog fired at will and used
body movement and excellent defensive skills to stay away from
Martirosyan’s range. He also avoided wild swings – the only weapon,
which the challenger could use and used to little effect.

It’s to be said that the challenger has never stopped trying and
delivered an exemplar performance of courage and dignity. However,
both his stature and his skill set was too limited to give the
champion a stern test. Martirosyan indeed had some moments in the
fourth and in the fifth rounds but he earned an even score at best.
Pirog, playing with him, turned up the pace in the seventh round and
began to deliver quality power punches to the head of Martirosyan.
Gennady’s face was battered and his right eye was almost completely
swollen shut and his right cheek suffered a cut. Gennady tried some
roughhouse tactics but it wasn’t enough.

In round nine, both fighters were down due a wet canvas, and both
falls were rightfully called slips by referee Victor Panin. In the
tenth, Pirog invited an onrushing Martirosyan closer and landed series
of horrific punches, which forced the challenger’s legs to buckle.
Pirog continued the beating but miraculously Martirosyan survived
until the end of the stanza without going down. Right after that
one-sided beating, the fight was stopped by Martirosyan’s coach
Vladimir Vidov – TKO 10 for Pirog. BoxingScene had the fight 100-91 –
at the time of stoppage.

http://www.boxingscene.com/pirog-vs-martirosyan-early-event-results-from-krasnodar–44195

Turkey should have courage to implement international obligation – M

news.am, Armenia
Sept 25 2011

Turkey should have courage to implement international obligation – MP

September 25, 2011 | 05:41

YEREVAN. – The decision of the Board of Turkish Ministers to call back
the Armenian-Turkish protocols, recognized invalid at the end of
August, are not enough for Armenia to make a responded step, MP,
spokesperson of ruling Armenian Republican Party Edward Sharmazanov
told Armenian News-NEWS.am.

According to Sharmazanov, Armenia has already stated its position.
Turkey should find political courage and will to implement its
international obligations. Thus, Turkey should ratify the protocols
and reject ultimatums and pre-conditions.

Earlier Armenian News-NEWS.am informed that Board of Turkish Directors
recognized invalid the Protocols at the end of August.

After the Protocols were signed, they were set for the ratification in
both parliaments. Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan declared to
suspend the process of the ratification in 2010, as the Turkish side
was not ready to continue the dialogue with Yerevan without
pre-conditions. Meanwhile, Armenian side did not call back its
signature from the Protocols.

Azerbaijan again `shifts the blame’ in Karabakh issue

Azerbaijan again `shifts the blame’ in Karabakh issue

September 25, 2011 – 17:24 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Kazan meeting was followed by zero step ahead in
nagorno Karabakh conflict resolution.

`Recently Minister Elmar Mammadyarov had a meeting in New York with MG
co-Chairs, but I don’t believe there is any progress, for co-Chairs
realize that changes are to occur in the Armenians’ position,’ Araz
Azimov, Azerbaijan’s Deputy Foreign Minister told journalists on
Saturday, Trend reports.

Karabakh conflict negotiation sides failed to reach compromise on a
range of issues.

The meeting was held by Russian President Medvedev’s initiative and
personal participation. The sides failed to reach common ground on the
resolution, despite calls and expectations of Russia, USA and France.

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian accused Baku of breakdown
of talks. According to him, Azerbaijan proved not ready to accept MG
co-Chairs’ proposal on the key principles of conflict resolution.

The key principles on Karabakh conflict resolution, named `Madrid
Principles’, were introduced to Armenia and Azerbaijan by French and
Russian Foreign Ministers and US State Secretary Assistant in November
2007 in Madrid, Spain’s capital.