Hamasyan’s Fable : Armenian-Born Musician Goes Solo On New Release

HAMASYAN’S FABLE : ARMENIAN-BORN MUSICIAN GOES SOLO ON NEW RELEASE
By STEPHEN COOKE

The Chronicle Herald

Feb 9 2012
Halifax, Canada

BY A WEIRD coincidence, this week began with a show by Deep Purple and
it wraps up with an artist who lists the British heavy rock legends as
a prime influence, yet their music couldn’t be more sharply contrasted.

Even so, Tigran Hamasyan can generate as much drama from a lone grand
piano as his early idols can with 10,000 watts of sound, which he’ll
demonstrate on Saturday at 8 p.m. at the Peggy Corkum Music Room,
formerly known as simply the Music Room, on Lady Hammond Road.

“Yeah, all these bands, Deep Purple, Nazareth, Black Sabbath and
Led Zeppelin, those guys were my heroes when I was a kid,” says the
Armenian-born musician over the phone from Los Angeles, sounding a
bit disappointed to learn that original Purple keyboardist Jon Lord
has been sidelined by injury and illness for the past few years.

There is no trace of rock and roll overkill on Hamasyan’s Verve
Records debut A Fable, just imaginative dexterity and a feel for
atmosphere and visual suggestion that can launch a flood of visual
images on What the Waves Brought and The Legend of the Moon.

At times, it feels like a soundtrack in search of a silent movie
with settings like a village carnival or the deepest, darkest woods
imaginable. It seems virtually impossible for two people to hear A
Fable in the exact same way, and it’s surprising to learn that this is
Hamasyan’s first solo recording, after a handful of combo recordings.

“You grow up playing alone; even with a band, most of your time is
spent at home by yourself practising or creating music,” he explains.

“Playing solo is one of the most natural things for any musician,
and I’ve been meaning to record solo because I’ve been playing solo
concerts for a while, and it seemed like the right time.

“It’s a challenge, you know? Because it takes time until you feel that
you can say something playing by yourself. There are so many solo piano
records out there, for over a century there’s been all this amazing
piano music, so it’s a big challenge to come up with something new.”

Don’t be surprised to hear echoes of solo piano work ranging from
Erik Satie to Keith Jarrett in Hamasyan’s performance, but he also
has a realm of influence that’s just as important in the folk tales,
songs and medieval hymns from his native Armenia.

“For example, I was inspired by the work of these fabulists that lived
in the 13th century, and they wrote an extensive number of fables,
and they were also political figures.

“It was amazing when I rediscovered them, and I realized that the
fables they were writing related to their everyday lives, and I related
to them as well. They’re about the exact same values, and you can
see how people in the world haven’t changed. It’s pretty remarkable.”

The concept of fables spans the Bible – What the Waves Brought
reminds me that the Ararat mountain range, the final resting place
of Noah’s ark, is in Armenia – to Walt Disney. Snow White’s Someday
My Prince Will Come takes on a tone that’s more dark than wistful:
“Be careful what you wish for,” it seems to say.

The album’s closer, Mother, Where Are You?, is a medieval Armenian
hymn that brings everything back to Earth, and sums up centuries of
the nation’s hardships and persecution in a few succinct lines.

“I’ve always been meaning to arrange that song, because I thought it
had one of the most amazing melodies I’ve ever heard,” says Hamasyan,
who feels the meaning comes across even if the listener doesn’t know
the background.

“It’s challenging to express myself in a way that people can understand
it, but I keep getting great feedback. I think all types of folk
music and religious music are part of something that’s universal and
it doesn’t matter what nationality you are.

“Whatever kind of folk music it is, you can understand it.”

Tickets for Hamasyan areavailable at jazzeast.com/tigran-hamasyan or
by calling 492-2225.

http://thechronicleherald.ca/artslife/60823-hamasyan-s-fable

The 1915 Armenian And Assyrian Genocides: Inconvenient Precedents Fo

THE 1915 ARMENIAN AND ASSYRIAN GENOCIDES: INCONVENIENT PRECEDENTS FOR THE ARAB SPRING REVOLUTIONS

Assyrian International News Agency AINA

Feb 9 2012

It was in a speech of 22 August 1939 that Hitler urged his volk to
slaughter without mercy men, women and children of the inferior Slavic
race as he planned to invade Poland. He ended this speech with these
chilling words:

“Who, after all, speaks of the annihilation of the Armenians?”

Of course it was not just the Armenians who have been forgotten. The
Assyrian nation were also prime targets of the Ottoman policy to
deliberately exterminate ancient Christian nations of the Middle East.

It has often been cited as a template for the very Holocaust
perpetrated by the Nazis in which six million Jews were deliberately
wiped out in the name of racial purity. What makes it more poignant
as that there is one other very inconvenient fact that is ignored
in all this. For years we have been fed information that Israelis
an apartheid state and that the Zionists foisted their unwelcome
colonialist intentions on the Palestinian natives. But if we look back
to the very genesis of the Zionist project we find Jewish pioneers
from Europe making arable land and small communities in what was
desert and malaria infested marsh sparsely inhabited by nomadic
Bedouin. This land was bought legally from the Ottoman authorities
but nevertheless alarmed the sublime Porte enough for the caliphate to
deliberately settle Circassians, Egyptians and Crimean Tatars in the
region. Sultan Abdulhamid II candidly admitted that this was because
he did not want Palestine to become a “Second Armenia”.

The question of recognising the Armenian genocide has become the
subject of recent high level diplomatic conflict between France
and Turkey. France Has made it a crime for anyone to deny that the
Armenian genocide took place, something which modern secular Turkey
continues to do so officially. For its part Turkey has accused France
of having committed genocide on the natives in its colonisation of
Algeria. There is once again a deep poignancy to all this. It was
to France that Ataturk had turned in his efforts to make Turkey a
secular, modern and civilised nation. The French Revolution was his
model and he prided himself on being a product of the Enlightenment.

But just as France had suppressed diversity in the ideal of creating
a common citizenship so too did a secular Turkey impose a homogenous
ethnic identity on what remained of the previous Ottoman Empire. Kurds
were denied the very right to be Kurdish and were pejoratively termed
‘Mountain Turks’. Was this so different from Algerian schoolchildren
reading history books which began with “Our ancestors the Gauls”? Now
when the Arab revolutions broke throughout 2011 there was optimistic
yet naïve talk that the new governments would steer their states
towards the much vaunted Turkish model which apparently emphasised
secularism and democracy. To say that this was clutching at straws is
an understatement. In any case it is apparent now that the new states
will have strict Salafi style governments to replace the pro-western
despotisms which by contrast may indeed have been ‘Salafist’ but were
anything but moderate and secular. Just as the National Party in South
Africa did not actually invent apartheid in 1948, but merely codified
the racial segregation and discrimination against non-whites which
had been practised and even extended by the ‘liberal’ government of
Jan Smuts into a statist ideological framework, the Salafi regimes
already have had much of their work done for them by dictators such
as Mubarak under whom official discrimination against minorities and
rampant anti-Semitism was rife. Calling the Salafi parties moderate
will not change this reality one iota.

To return to the relevance of Turkey how actually secular was it?

Ataturk salvaged the remnants of the Ottoman state in order to build
modern Turkey and in doing so united all Muslims against the Christian
enemy. The sultan had actively used pan-Islamic sentiment to court
Kurdish support in the First World War and in the genocide against
Armenians and Assyrians. Kurdish chieftans had seized Armenian land
after the deportations and genocide of 1915 and were easily persuaded
by Turkish nationalists to join with them as fellow Muslims in a
common resistance to wiping out the Armenians. In May 1919 the Grand
Vizier Ferit Pasha sent Mustafa Kemal to Kurdistan where he appealed
to the population using the self-styled title “saviour of Kurdistan”.

He championed the cause of the Khilafat in his appeal to Islamic
sentiment to expel the kuffar from sacred Muslim land in which he
stressed the Ottoman fraternity that bound Kurds and Turks together.

Appeal to the Turkish nation was not even on his lips here or in the
Erzurman Congress of July and August 1919. Turkish officers commanded
Kurdish soldiers in order to defeat the armies of Christian Georgia.

These same largely Kurdish armies helped liberate Anatolia for the
Turks against the imperialist aspirations of Greece. But as the war
progressed Kurdish aspirations were crushed. On 1 November 1922 Kemal
declared that the new Turkish state had been created. The Treaty
of Lausanne of 24 June 1923 carved up Kurdistan and established the
borders of modern Turkey. Kurds were said to be equal partners with
Turks in this new state.

It was only after the establishment of the republic that ethnic
identities of Kurds, Laz and Circassians were suppressed in favour
of the surrogate faith of Turkish nationalism which was to replace a
state based on Islam. Turkish national and racial identity is still
extolled with schools, barracks and public buildings prominently
extolling slogans such as “What a joy it is to be able to call oneself
a Turk”, “A Turk is worth the whole universe” and that Turks are
“the most valiant and noble race on earth”. Republican secular Turkey
continues to deny the very historical fact of the Armenian genocide by
the Islamic empire of the Uthmani Khilafat. In ‘Hitler’s Apocalypse’
Robert Wistrich of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem has elaborated
on how Kemal merely extended the nationalistic trends which were
evident even under the caliphate:

“The Turkish government’s objective was to destroy the Christian
Armenian population inside Turkey, which was deemed to be actively
seeking full independence or autonomy. Previously regarded as a
constituent dhimmi millet (a non-Muslim religious community in
the Ottoman Empire) the Armenians found themselves stereotyped as
an ‘alien nationality’, especially after the modernising rulers
of Turkey adopted the new ideology of Pan-Turkism. This was a
xenophobic nationalism intended to underpin their dreams of a new
empire stretching from Anatolia to western China, based on Islam
and Turkish ethnicity. The Armenian nation, with its ancient ethnic
culture and Christian religion, stood in the way of the homogenising
nationalism embraced by the young Turks.”

The Turkish-speaking Christians of Karaman were held to be Greek and
hence expelled to Greece. But they spoke no Greek at all, only used
Greek script to write their mother tongue. When one realises that the
“Turks” expelled in turn from Greece actually spoke only Greek which
they wrote in Arabic script, it was in fact a forcible exchange of
Muslim and Greek Orthodox Christian populations, since Arabs, Kurds,
Bosniaks and Albanians could be accepted as Turks because they are
Muslims. Hardly secular for a supposedly secular state. Indeed Turk
continued to equal Muslim, and non-Muslims are not considered to be
Turks. President Suleyman Demeril put it so succinctly in 1995:

“We are all — barring non-Muslims — owners of this land.”

That same logic was used to brutally suppress any hints of Kurdish
identity as Ataturk crushed this minority throughout his premiership.

Kurds were forcibly Turkified and forbidden from speaking their own
language. In disturbing echoes of Australia’s Stolen Generation,
children were deliberately removed from Kurdish families in order to
remove the inferior racial and cultural strains. Again the genocide
of Christian minorities by both the Ottoman Empire and the caliphate’s
successor state of modern Turkey is instructive here. Between 1925 and
1928 about a million Kurds were deported and thousands died en route.

While the survivors were dispersed throughout Anatolia in order to
make Turkification easier, ethnic Turks were settled to dilute Kurdish
demographics in Kurdistan. Turkish language was of course enforced
throughout the country, especially on the Kurds. In 1927 in Bihandus,
Lebanon, the Hoyboun (Independence) Congress brought together Kurdish
nationalist groups who in desperation made overtures to the Armenians.

Indeed Vahan Papazyan from the Armenian nationalist Dashrak Party
attended the conference.Turkey sensed a Kurdish-Armenian conspiracy
and in 1930 persuaded Iran to cut off aid to the Kurdish revolt around
Mount Ararat. Kurdish villages suffered aerial bombardment for months
and yet again thousands were killed by the Turkish military. In August
1930 Prime Minister Ismet Pasha triumphantly announced:

“Only the Turkish nation is entitled to claim ethnic and national
rights in this country. No other element has any such right.”

Minister of Justice Mahmut Esat Bozhurt was even more forthright:

“We live in a country called Turkey, the freest country in the world.

As your deputy, I feel I can express my real convictions without
reserve: I believe that the Turk must be only lord, the only master
of this country. Those who are not of pure Turkish stock can have
only one right in this country, the right to be servants and slaves.”

In 1937 and 1938 the last Kurdish resistance was snuffed out in
Dersim. In disturbing echoes of the Armenian genocide, Kurds were
burnt alive in barns, caves and forests. Women and girls committed
mass suicide. Kurdish identity was now subsumed under the unconvincing
label of “Mountain Turks”. Turks were a civilised and valiant people
who had attained victory over a savage and backward enemy, an inferior
race against whom Turkish nationalism could assert itself; the Kurds.

Savage repression followed with even the faintest stirrings of
Kurdishness being crushed. For example, in June 1967 the nationalist
journal Otuken carried an uncompromisingly venomous piece by one
Nihaz Atsiz :

“If they want to carry on speaking a primitive language with
vocabularies of only four or five thousand words, if they want to
create their own state and publish what they like, let them go and
do it somewhere else. We Turks have shed rivers of blood to take
possession of these lands; we had to uproot Georgians, Armenians
and Byzantine Greeks….let them go off wherever they want, to Iran,
to Pakistan, to India, or to join Barzani. Let them ask the United
Nations to find them a homeland in Africa. The Turkish race is very
patient, but when it is really angered it is like a roaring lion and
nothing can stop it. Let them ask the Armenians who we are, and let
them draw the appropriate conclusions.”

Colonel Alpan Turkes enjoyed huge influence with his calls for
pan-Turanianism. In 1965 he formed Milliyetci Harekat Partisi
(Nationalist Action Party) or MHP to defend Turkey against the twin
threats of communism and Kurdish separatism. After 1967 the MHP
organised paramilitary units known as Bozkurt (Grey Wolves) to murder
and intimidate left-wing Turkish and Kurdish students. The party only
gained two seats in parliament but exerted much wider influence with
its extreme views that the Kurds had to either accept assimilation
as Turks, or face physical annihilation. Only in 2002Turkey did
make grudging reforms in allowing Kurdish language broadcasting
and education. Lack of major changes meant that violent resistance
to Turkish rule continued. Kurdish politicians who have tried to
use the existing parliamentary mechanisms to elicit change suffer
harassment by the state, including jailing and assassination.Turkey
still does not exactly encourage ethnic diversity. Many Turks are of
Albanian descent but outwardly conform as Turks. Albanian-speaking
Muslim Kosovar refugees in the 1990s were treated as outsiders. Even
the late prime minister Turgut Ozal suffered taunts from Turkish
ultra-nationalists due to his part-Kurdish origins. In Turkey the
unskilled workers operate closed shop trade unions that exclude
marginal and minority groups such as the Roma Gypsies.

Even the limited secularisation by Kemalism has been rolled back.

Since the time of Ismet Inonu, Islam has made a comeback in Turkey.

The military is regarded as the stalwart of Kemalist secularism and the
most devoted disciple of Ataturk’s legacy. Yet after the coup of 1980
the ruling military junta made religious lessons compulsory in order
to counter the influence of the Left. Ozal’s Motherland Party had a
strong Islamic element within it. Even the pro-Islamic leader Erbekan,
leader of the National Salvation Party and later the Welfare Party,
was a virulent Turkish nationalist who wanted all of Cyprus occupied
by Turkey.

As it happens there can be no doubt that even the much vaunted Turkish
model is not going to be exported to former Ottoman colonies. Indeed
even within Turkey the Kemalist system is fast ditching its secularism
while retaining its nationalist core. Now the Arab Spring has brought
Salafi forces into dominance who seem intent on following the Pakistani
model of regression. Of course this failed state has been bolstered
not just by western aid but has become a vassal of Saudi Arabia For
some years where along with other Third World guest workers Pakistanis
toil in jobs which until 1962 would have been the preserve of black
slaves and which still offer them few rights.

Pakistan’s largest city of Karachi is rife with ethnic conflict between
the country’s main ethnic groups of Sindhis, Punjabis, Pathans and
Muhajirs. The Baluch have had their aspirations crushed right from
inception in their native homeland. Failing to become full members of
the Arab master race the leaders of Pakistan retain attachment to the
language of Urdu while feeling it necessary to disown or downplay the
majority language which is often their own mother tongue of Punjabi.

Similarly we can expect to see the native inhabitants of the
Maghreb known variously as Berber or Kabyle suppressed in favour of
Arabisation which has been carried out since the departure of the
French colonialists.Pakistan also offers another sinister precedent
which again brings us back to the genocide of Armenians and Assyrians
in 1915. At independence the area which is now Pakistan was about
twenty per cent Hindu and Sikh.

Where are these communities now? They barely make up one per cent of
the population. Along with much larger Christian communities and the
microscopic Kailash people extinction of these once vibrant non-Muslim
minorities is within sight as western democracies once again avert
their gaze from inconvenient facts. Of course one does not even need
to look at Pakistan. Witness how half of Iraq’s Christians have fled,
many into Syria where the imminent fall of the Assad regime does not
bode well for minority Christian, Shia and the dictator’s very own
Alawite community.

The Assyrians of Iraq have faced the unrelenting and uncompromising
hatred of the state since they were machine gunned by the regular
army and massacred in pogroms by Arabs and Kurds in 1933 whipped up
by King Faisal’s prime minister, the pan-Arabist Rashid Ali. While
Saddam Hussain gassed the Kurds, there were elements among the Kurdish
‘freedom fighters’ who vented their own genocidal hatred against the
Assyrians in their midst. Therefore to blame the genocide of ancient
Middle Eastern nations on simply Turkish nationalism is missing the
point and is inaccurate.

Does it explain the demographic catastrophe suffered by Maronite and
other Christians who once formed the majority population in Lebanon?

Or the present situation of Iraqi Christians, the half century of
slavery and genocide against southern Sudanese, the grim future faced
by Copts in Egypt? Ethnic cleansing, forced assimilation, rape and
conversion to Islam at the point of the gun and dagger will become
more commonplace. Again the precedent of Pakistan is relevant. At
partition Mahatma Gandhi urged Hindus and Sikhs to remain in the
new state of Pakistan. The result was that they were driven out,
raped, slaughtered or forcibly converted. The same will happen to
those minority groups in the post-revolution Arab nations. Simply
averting our gaze will not change this. While an earlier generation
of Jews from Iraq, Egypt, Libya and former French North Africa found
sanctuary in Israel where will the Christian minorities go?

To a Europe that has become increasingly secularised and simultaneously
xenophobic as it loses its cultural moorings while its economies
fail? To America where seemingly sympathetic voices on the
Republican right also garner populist support through anti-immigrant
rhetoric? Hence why I have said newly independent South Sudan may
offer a way out. This may be decried as unrealistic but is it any more
unrealistic than expecting the Salafi regimes to be ‘moderate’? Again
averting our gaze will not change the fact that we are not seeing
the emergence of democracy in these states but the growth of a lumpen
flotsam element which through occasional suppression (along of course
with collaboration and co-opting) by ‘secular’ pro-western despots
has made them experienced, nastier and more determined in their
dystopianism than ever.

As with Pakistan western democracies have funded the very radical
Islamic forces which now threaten the precarious existence which
minorities lived under what remained dhimmitude, subject as they were
to arbitrary powers of the state and lack of equality before the law.

In 1945America offered a Europe devastated by war financial help in
return for democratic governments. This Marshall Plan was aid with
strings unapologetically attached. Yet now after years of funding
despots, America and Europethink that the victorious Salafi and
Wahhabi forces can be feted by what are effectively bribes for good
behaviour. As the present trials of American NGO employees in Cairo
demonstrations this would be a disastrous miscalculation. The Salafis
do not see it as aid or assistance. They at least recognise it for what
it is; a modern updated version of the jizya tax. When will western
democracies similarly open their eyes and realise that they face an
‘Armenian’ scenario in the aftermath of the Arab Spring? After all
Saudi funded imperialism of the Maghreb will not settle on remaining
south of the Mediterranean. Will this ‘Armenian’ lesson come too late
for us? As the late Oriana Fallaci wrote in ‘The Force of Reason’on
her native Italy:

“Those coasts where still today you can see the remains of the
watchtowers used for spotting their arrival and warning the towns and
villages. And where still resounds the echo of the scream which today
is used as a mockery but at the time was a cry of terror and despair:
“Mamma, li turchi! Mother, the Turks!”.

But it is this next quote by her which should inspire us with
confidence and courage in the face of the present adversity against
those forces who would strive to take away the freedoms which we take
for granted but were only achieved after centuries of struggle:

“The moment you give up your principles, and your values, you are dead,
your culture is dead, your civilization is dead. Period.”

By Ranbir Singh

http://www.aina.org/news/2012029142353.htm
www.conservativepapers.com

VIDEO: Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan Falls Asleep During Parliamen

VIDEO: DEFENSE MINISTER SEYRAN OHANYAN FALLS ASLEEP DURING PARLIAMENT SESSION

epress.am
02.08.2012

There was a question and answer period with members of Armenia’s
government in the National Assembly today. During the second half of
the day, the room as usual was half empty.

When Heritage Party MP Stepan (Styopa) Safaryan began talking about
environmental issues, RA Minister of Defense Seyran Ohanyan closed
his eyes and slept briefly.

ANKARA: Turkish Foreign Minister Comments On Swiss Genocide Probe

TURKISH FOREIGN MINISTER COMMENTS ON SWISS GENOCIDE PROBE

Anadolu Agency
Feb 7 2012
Turkey

Ankara, 7 February: Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on
Tuesday said that Switzerland and France were two different cases.

Davutoglu’s comments came after Switzerland launched an investigation
Monday on recent remarks made by Turkish EU Minister and Chief
Negotiator Egemen Bagis on the incidents of 1915 in Switzerland.

Switzerland and France are two cases that do not resemble each other.

On one hand, there is a law supported by the political will in France
and a completed process with penalties. On the other hand, there is
an incomplete legal process in Switzerland, Davutoglu noted.

Swiss Confederation President Michelin Calmy-Rey had criticized the
handling of historic matters by politicians in a recent trip to Turkey,
Davutoglu said.

We have summoned the Swiss ambassador in Ankara to the Turkish Ministry
of Foreign Affairs (MFA) on Monday after Switzerland launched an
investigation against Egemen Bagis, Davutoglu underlined.

In a recent trip to Switzerland, Minister Bagis had said that the
incidents of 1915 were not a “genocide”.

A law in Switzerland makes it a crime to deny Armenian allegations
in regard to the incidents of 1915.

Bollywood Blockbusters Popular Among Students

BOLLYWOOD BLOCKBUSTERS POPULAR AMONG STUDENTS
By NADIAH JOHARI

The Statesman

Feb 8 2012
Utah

The recently aired movie “A Cinderella Story: Once Upon A Song”
featured Bollywood elements that incorporated Indian dance, music,
costumes and colors. For Yeva Muradyan, the film was part of a
Bollywood trend spreading across campus.

“It has opened new ways for me to view the world and find out ~E
other cultures can be interesting,” said Muradyan, a junior majoring
in public relations.

Muradyan, a native of Armenia, said she started watching Bollywood
movies with her mother when she was a child. She said Armenians
are familiar with the Indian culture because Bollywood movies are
common there.

She said she is interested in Indian culture and Hinduism, and watching
Bollywood movies is a way for her to feel the culture.

“It’s very unique, it’s very old, it’s something that is different,
and I find it pretty amazing … the way they dance, the way they sing,
and the way they dress,” she said. “I can’t adapt to their culture
because it’s very different from mine, but I love to watch it. I’m
fascinated with it.”

Ashwin Kumar, a graduate student studying electrical engineering,
said Bollywood is a large industry in India, and almost all Bollywood
movies are love-oriented.

“Bollywood for Indians is more like an escape,” Kumar said. “It has
a lot of dance and colors. They put in a lot of hard work into stage
performances and the music that they play.”

Pooja Kavathekar, a graduate student studying computer science, said
even though there are political differences between Inida and Pakistan,
everyone – Indian or Pakistani – comes together for Bollywood.

Bollywood creates a cultural union, Kumar said.

Kavathekar said the average budget for a Bollywood movie is $8 million
because of the jewelry, costumes, sound effects and travel. Kumar
said he thinks it’s funny that the production crew loves to shoot
outside India.

“One thing about Bollywood, which Hollywood will probably never have,
is that there is no movie (that) can (have) a bad ending,” he said.

Kumar said other differences between Hollywood and Bollywood include
musical and dancing elements. He said family values are emphasized
in Bollywood movies, too.

“I think this is one thing that Bollywood cherishes. No matter what,
basic family values, such as not going against mother and father,
having special respect for (parents) and treating women as they should
be, are given a lot of concentration, and generally movies never go
against those values,” he said.

Kumar said in old Bollywood movies profanity and kissing scenes were
not allowed. However, he said today Bollywood accepts those elements
because of Western influence.

Kavathekar said movies containing elements of nudity are controversial
in India. She said movies are evaluated before they are released and
inappropriate scenes are often removed.

Carrie Miller, a USU graduate, said she sees Bollywood as a cinematic
tradition.

She said she was first introduced to Bollywood when she and her sister
were looking for a movie in high school. She came across the movie
“Bride and Prejudice,” which featured some Bollywood actors and
actresses. Although the movie was entirely in English, there were
some Bollywood elements she said she liked.

Initially, Miller said she did not know whether she liked the movies,
but she said the more she watched the Indian films, the more she came
to enjoy them.

Miller said she likes that there’s no swearing, sex or kissing scenes
in the Bollywood movies she has seen – they seem to promote values
that correspond with her own.

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Bollywood movie that I would have
rated PG-13,” she said.

Miller said she has greater appreciation for other cultures as a
result of being exposed to Bollywood.

“I grew up in a small Utah town – predominantly white, predominantly
Christian,” she said. “If it weren’t for Bollywood and my interest in
other cultures, I wouldn’t really have a lot of access to other ideas.”

To sum up Bollywood in one idea it would be “controlled chaos in
wonderland,” Kumar said.

http://www.usustatesman.com/bollywood-blockbusters-popular-among-students-1.2697067

Turk’s EU Minister Stands By Genocide Comments

TURK’S EU MINISTER STANDS BY GENOCIDE COMMENTS

Emirates 24/7

Feb 8 2012
UAE

Turkey’s EU affairs minister repeated on Tuesday his denial that
Ottoman Turks had committed genocide against Armenians nearly 100
years ago, in a challenge to Swiss officials who are investigating
whether similar comments last month broke the law.

Turkey summoned the Swiss ambassador on Monday to complain about the
decision by Swiss officials to investigate minister Egemen Bagis’s
comments at the World Economic Forum in Davos and also at a concert
in Zurich.

“I said there on that day that what happened in 1915 was not genocide
and I repeat that today. Nobody should doubt that I will give the
same answer every time I am asked,” Bagis told a news conference.

“I don’t recognise any power that can detain any minister of the
Turkish Republic. I am very much at ease on this subject,” he said.
“If necessary I would go again to Davos and say the same thing.”

Swiss anti racism laws make it illegal to deny a genocide.

Last month, the French Senate approved similar legislation, prompting
an angry response from Turkey. Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan
termed the legislation “discriminatory and racist”.

More than 130 lawmakers who had voted against the bill have appealed
to France’s highest court, the Constitutional Council, to overturn
the law, arguing that the events in 1915-17 were still the subject
of historical contention, and the legislation ultimately infringed
the right to free speech.

The court has a month to decide.

Armenia, backed by many historians and parliaments, says about 1.5
million Christian Armenians were killed in what is now eastern Turkey
during World War One in a deliberate policy of genocide ordered by
the Ottoman government.

The Ottoman empire was dissolved at the end of the war, but successive
Turkish governments and the vast majority of Turks believe the charge
of genocide is an insult to their nation. Ankara argues there was
heavy loss of life on both sides during fighting in the region.

An attorney for the Zurich state prosecutor’s office said Swiss
officials had started an initial probe into Bagis’s remarks after
receiving a complaint from the Switzerland-Armenia group. As a
minister, Bagis may enjoy immunity from prosecution.

Swiss authorities have taken legal action against several people who
have denied the Armenian genocide. The most prominent case is the
conviction of Turkish politician Dogu Perincek, who was fined 3,000
Swiss francs in 2007.

http://www.emirates247.com/news/world/turk-s-eu-minister-stands-by-genocide-comments-2012-02-08-1.441893

Moscow And "Trialeti Ossetia"

MOSCOW AND “TRIALETI OSSETIA”

Experts’ club

Feb 8 2012
Georgia

08/02/2012 09:00
Giorgi Tsiklauri

New hotbeds of future conflict

An uneasy conscience betrays itself – meaning of this proverb was
fully demonstrated by spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
of Russia, when he made a statement that official Tbilisi supposedly
tried to prevent residents of North Ossetia-Alania from visiting
neighbouring Kazbegi region of Georgia. And, probably, Alexander
Lukashevich deserves to be thanked for the fact that he drew attention
to a subject, relevance of which is gradually increasing.

“In North Ossetia, there are quite a few natives of the Kazbegi
district, those who have relatives there, homes. And it is at exactly
this kind of people of the borderland who are ethnic Ossetians that
restrictive measures of the authorities of Georgia are aimed at –
Russian diplomat says. – A relevant database was created at the
Kazbegi checkpoint for this category of persons and their relatives.

They are not allowed to enter Georgia”. In this connection the
Russian Foreign Ministry did not fail to declare that “facts of open
discrimination of Ossetians on the Georgian border are again confirmed:
slogans of” all Caucasian Friendship” is just a hypocritical cover
for the provocative and continuously chauvinistic policy of Tbilisi.”

Before turning to reasons, which actually caused the righteous anger
of the Russian Foreign Ministry, we should remind one fact: every
state has the sovereign right to refuse entry to any foreigner whose
presence in its territory it for some reason considers undesirable.

And at that the state does not have to explain reasons for the
refusal. But for some reason we have to repeatedly remind Moscow about
this universal rule, which is daily followed all over the world, –
Moscow whose baggage of similar actions is certainly not comparable
with the Georgian experience. Though, entry on the Russian borders is
suspiciously often denied to such undesirable persons, as journalists,
human rights activists and dissidents. The category of citizens that
may encounter problems on the border of Georgia was mentioned already
and will be discussed below in more details, taking into account,
as they like to repeat in Russia, “new realities”.

We should also dwell on bogey of “Georgian chauvinism,” image of
which is so carefully nurtured in Moscow. A decent person, unlike Mr.

Lukashevich, generally would not touch this topic. Because an official
representative of the country in which clashes among ethnic groups,
murders on national and racial grounds, marches with swastikas and
Nazi salutes under the walls of the Kremlin have become the norm,
should be ashamed to rant about someone else’s chauvinism. The more
shameful it must be to “incriminate” neighbours, who, in response to
these farfetched claim, can bring out an example of very real campaign
of the 2006 mass deportation of Georgians from Russia and many other
shameful examples, using more offensive words than “chauvinism”
at that.

However, “there is no smoke without fire” and the words of Lukashevich
must be due to something. Let’s try to figure out what exactly is a
reason behind them …

On January 30th Georgian Deputy Foreign Minister commented on the
statement of the Russian colleague. David Jalagania described
Alexander Lukashevich’s accusations as “cynical” and recalled
how zealously Moscow protested in October 2010 in connection with
the decision of Georgia to remove visa restrictions for the North
Caucasians – and now it turns out, it is protesting for exactly the
opposite reason. Meanwhile, according to official data of the Georgian
Interior Ministry, in 2011 the Kazbegi-Larsi checkpoint – the only
legal checkpoint on the Georgian-Russian land border was crossed by
more than 191 thousand people. Out of which, the largest group, or
99,000, were Russian citizens. Of which the non-visa regime introduced
by Tbilisi for the North Caucasus, was mostly enjoyed by residents of
North Ossetia-Alania – more than 8 600 visitors. In second place, far
behind are residents of Dagestan – about 2 000. They are followed by
residents of Kabardino-Balkaria – 690 visitors, Adygea – 574, Chechnya
– 334, Karachaevo-Cherkessia – 317, and Ingushetia – 28 people.

But let’s leave aside the official statistics and take a look on the
internet. The blogosphere, which has become one of the best indicators
of modern life, presents a number of positive stories and trip reports
of North Caucasians in Georgia. Moreover, Ossetians, once again,
dominate. But then complaints about the refusal of entry and evidence
of discriminatory treatment are somehow nowhere to be seen on the
internet. With one exception and this exception is Vladikavkaz-based
organization Darial. It is its members that from time to time organize
press-conferences in the capital of North Ossetia and complain to
the press about the closed Georgian border. The last such meeting
was held on January 27th suspiciously in sync with the statement of Mr.

Lukashevich and in its content it was a little more detailed account
of his claims. These claims, we note, also highlight “natives of
Kazbegi district” – that is, a group of Ossetians, which, according
to a legend, is represented by the Vladikavkaz-based Darial.

According to the legend, the organization advocates for the cause of
nearly two thousand former residents of Georgia, ethnic Ossetians,
who, because of climatic and socio-economic conditions moved to North
Ossetia in 2006, when Russia closed the border and found themselves
cut off from their homes. And now it’s the Georgian authorities that
prevent them from visiting their native land. But this is the latest,
“soft” version, which apparently Darial deemed necessary to use to
achieve their goals on the humanitarian line in a more persuasive
manner. While in earlier versions, instead of social roots of the
problem main role was played by Georgians-Nazis who en masse banished
Ossetians from the Kazbegi district, and other tales of this kind.

And, since this region is indeed closely connected to Ossetia, and a
lot of the Ossetians really lived (and live to this day) it is easy
for Darial to, if necessary, present before the press some of the
local natives, who will speak before a camera all that organizers need.

The point of this effort is to introduce into the information space
a thesis of presence of a hitherto unknown “disputed territories” –
that is, it is about creating an ideological base for the expansion
of geography of the Georgian-Russian conflict. Representatives of
Darial have already started to call on human rights organizations –
together with such distinguished human rights activists as Vladimir
Putin and Eduard Kokoity – “to give a legal assessment to actions of
the Georgian government towards indigenous inhabitants of the region –
Ossetians.” And they also add that “… formerly, Kazbegi district –
gorges of Darial, Tyrsygomsk (Truso – ed.), Guda and Kobi valley-
was the eastern part of the historical Ossetia.”

For the first time Darial made itself known in the middle of 2009 –
a year after the Russian-Georgian war and the occupation of 20% of the
territory of Georgia by Russia. And soon after Eduard Kokoity in April
2009 for the first time said that Tskhinvali regime intended to demand
“return of the Truso gorge to Ossetia which in the twenties of the
XX century was given by the Bolsheviks into the administration of the
Georgian SSR.” Till the end of the 2010 rhetoric of the organization,
which was then very quickly set up in Vladikavkaz, included very few
“human rights” and “humanitarian” notes while territorial claims were
heard in full voice. Chairman of Darial Gairbek Salbiev have never
failed to raise the subject of “native Ossetian lands” whenever he
travelled to Tskhinvali or spoke to reporters in Vladikavkaz. It is
easy to see that the number of “disputed” gorges has since increased.

But this is just the beginning. The worst is still to come when we
look at maps, which is used as illustrations in the Darial-related
publications in the South Ossetian and North Ossetian media.

These maps depict “enhanced”, “historic South Ossetia.” But it is
not only expanded at the expanse of the above-mentioned places. To
the south of the former administrative border of the South Ossetian
Autonomous District is marked yet another and far more extensive
band of the “disputed” territory – it stretches from west to east
following the river Mtkvari (Kura) from the town of Kareli, passing
through Gori and reaching Tbilisi. To the north of outskirts of the
Georgian capital there is a territory that goes up to Truso valley to
which Darial started to lay claims. Together, this means an increase
of the current “South Ossetia” by more than one and a half times. At
that, according to them, “native Ossetian land” includes also (!) the
ancient capital of Georgia – Mtskheta. That’s it. The Jews that have
been living here for over two millennia, for all this time, were
not smart enough to proclaim the place of confluence of the rivers
of Kura and Aragvi a territory of Israel… And here, one relatively
young people that trace their descent to nomads of the steppes, are
suddenly suggesting to find their roots in the mountains, on which
Iberians- ancient Georgians in deep antiquity erected temples to
pagan deities Gats and Gaim …

Let’s summarize. There are some young organization, which declares
that is engaged in human rights and humanitarian activities. But,
this organization began with political activities – in particular,
together with the bandit regime of Kokoity it laid new territorial
claims against Georgia. And today, in a somewhat veiled form it
is promoting relevant ideological base, introducing the concept
of “Ossetian land” with regards of a good half of the region of
Mtskheta-Mtianeti. At the same time they are not yet saying, but
drawing on maps with twice bigger piece of the territory of Shida
Kartli. And suddenly it appears that this organization has a backing of
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. Of course,
there is no evidence – we can only speculate and draw conclusions –
but if someone thinks that the resulting picture has nothing to do
with the Kremlin and the purposeful activity of enemy intelligence,
it can attributed to extreme naivety and lack of familiarity with
similar projects more than enough of which has been seen by Georgia.

Now let’s try to answer a question: how should the Georgian government
react in this regard? There may be several options. However, it is
clear that studying of the Darial activity and compiling dossiers
on members of this organization would be the minimum necessary
operational work that the Georgian counter-intelligence was required
to do immediately. The same as for the preparation of the checkpoint
“black list” of persons who should not be allowed into Georgia in
order prevent activists of Darial from making a provocation. It is
well known how the Russian army loves keep peace (war) and “protect
compatriots” on a foreign soil. And information that the occupants
deployed in the Akhalgori district have been probing opportunity to
save someone else, this time in a nearby Truso gorge, were leaked
in late 2009 and early 2010. And then no one will understand how and
what it was. For example, they are still searching for a mass grave
of Ossetian virgins burned alive in Tskhinvali, but who cares now?

Elementary logic compels to recognize that the complaints of Alexander
Lukashevich and Darial do not sound out of nowhere. And there must
be the database and information on refusals of entry if people who
work in appropriate structures of Georgia have minimum competence
and responsibility. But this concerns not some abstract, innocently
infringed Ossetians, but quite specific individuals associated with
implementation of a particular political project. Ossetians as a whole,
as it was shown above, are actively using visa-free regime better
than others and, for the most part, encounter no problems at all. I
guess we do not need to explain why the Ministry of Interior Affairs
or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia without significant
reasons will not go into specific detail in their public statements
and draw attention to the work of counterintelligence, giving food
for speculation on this topic.

By the way, with respect to the Russian Foreign Ministry it should be
noted here that the statement of Lukashevich of January 27th was the
first concrete proof that Darial is not a local initiative at the
level of Tskhinvali and Vladikavkaz, and the project, as minimum,
is coordinated with Moscow. So far the public contacts of the
organization did not rise above the protocol meeting with Kokoity
and Mamsurov and in 2011 it was characterized by a sharp decline in
its activities – which can be attributed to the need to smooth out
the initial clumsiness and, after a pause, to remind about it in a
new “humanitarian” aspect. Under such cover which it is possible
to coordinate efforts with the Russian Foreign Ministry too. And
it does not matter who allowed or not allowed across the border –
Georgia is still unlikely to open its doors for activists of Darial –
but it does not stop them to work in the information field. At this
stage, more is not needed. And when it is needed, right people will
be sent into Georgia one way or another. For example, via the already
occupied territory, accompanied by armoured personnel carriers and
with cries in the media about poor citizens of the Russian Federation
that are forced by the Tbilisi regime to resort to extreme measures,
systematically being denied legitimate travel to their native land …

One would put a full stop here, but there are signs that the plan
drawn up in Russia has a much more extensive nature. Have you already
digested historically Ossetian Gori, Mtskheta and Dusheti? Then welcome
to “Trialeti Ossetia”. That was the name given by unknown authors of
Wikipedia a territory area spread on the Trialeti Range between Gori,
Kareli, Khashuri, Borjomi, Tsalka and Caspi, where among Georgian
villages there are compact settlements of Ossetians. Thus, “Trialeti
Ossetia” extends “the expanded South Ossetia” to the south and only
Javakheti region with its dominant share of the Armenian population
is between it and Armenia, where the 102nd Russian military base is
deployed in Gyumri. Does this lead to any thoughts?

The emergence of “Trialeti Ossetia” in virtual space, as well as
materials about “Tyrsyg” occurred in the beginning of 2010, which fits
well in the timing of Darial. Absence of any interviews and articles
in the press, which would theoretically justify claims to cover all
areas south of Tskhinvali, is a little confusing. But that, as they
say, will come with time – the whole project is just three years old
and it has been focused on the Kazbegi region so far. Therefore,
one can only wonder at the fact that another Ossetia has not yet
been found in the Kakheti region – there are compact settlements
of Ossetians there too. However, emergence of “Lagodekhi Ossetia”
is clearly prevented by its location in the extreme east of Georgia
and a lack of communication with the rest of Ossetia – a bad geography
does not appeal to our northern neighbour …

Speaking of geography. If one adds up all the maps with the “native
Ossetian land,” we get a blue dream of Russian superpower supporters:
the Caucasus, completely separated from north to south with “outposts”
of Russia. North Ossetia-Alania, plus the “South Ossetia”, enhanced
by the Georgian Military Highway, and the middle reaches of the Kura,
plus “Trialeti Ossetia” … Plus, as we know from the Russian media,
the “native Armenian Javakhk” and Native Armenian Armenia with the
Russian base and direct access to Iran.

And again, not only Georgia will be cut in half, but the entire
Caucasus, which, in case of realization of this idea, will not be
divided in the North and South Caucasus but into the west and east.

Isolated from each other by massive “Super Ossetia”, which will be
closely tied to Russia by a deadly feud with all the neigh neighbouring
Caucasian nations. No Caucasian integration, no transit routes, no
alternative oil and gas pipelines … Surely, in this picture all those
who follow periodic revelations of Moscow thinkers on the subject of
“de-sovereignization of Georgia”, “a new conquest of the Caucasus”
and other washing-of-boots-in-warm-seas, have already seen familiar
features. That is a development of the process that was initiated
by the Bolsheviks in annexed Georgia in 1922 through the formation
of the South Ossetian region in the lands of Kartli, Imereti, Racha
and Svaneti regions of Georgia.

Obviously the article is largely based on assumptions. But, sure,
on legitimate assumptions – given the recent history of Georgia
and existing situation of today. For it was “little things” like
this that the conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia were started
from at the time, as well as attempts to foment conflicts in other
regions. And now we have the “new realities” in the face of Georgia’s
occupied territories that received Russian recognition and we need
to recognize that correct diagnosis at an early stage is half of
successful treatment of a disease.

Formation of the basis for expanding the geography of the conflict is
just beginning, although its contours have already been marked. And
this is the least calculated on Ossetians living in Georgia – if only
because all too apparent absurdity of the identified claims. It should
be remembered that, despite all the ugly aspects of the conflict
in “South Ossetia” in the early nineties of the last century, the
absolute majority of Ossetians remained “ours” and far ahead of all
other minority groups when it comes to integration. They are actively
represented at all levels – from ministerial to officers and soldiers
that were repelling Russia’s aggression in the vicinity of “sleeping
Tskhinvali.” Therefore, the worst reaction from the Georgian side
would be demonstration of any anti-Ossetian sentiment – which is one
of the goals of this provocation. And the fact that the provocation
will gradually gain momentum is in no doubt after the Russian Foreign
Ministry became involved in the Darial project.

Unfortunately, among the North Ossetian – especially among young
people – the idea of the new “native Ossetian land” in the heart of
Georgia may well take roots. All Caucasians have a soft spot for
all sorts of “upgrades” to their history. And Ossetians were also
placed here out of competition because of their role assigned to
them by the current policy in the Caucasus, and Moscow’s long-term
plans. In a world where they seriously talk about Ossetian Lon-Don
and are ready to move from the shores of Albion in the direction of
ancient Egypt, with its god Os-Ir-Is, “Trialeti Ossetia” is just a
light snack at the feast of ideological pseudo-senility. So, these
ideas will get some “public support” in the North Ossetia-Alania –
enough so that through hyperbolisation of the subject in the media
gradually introduce the thesis of the new “disputed territories”
and create a virtual conflict. In other words – to create a solid
information background to transfer the conflict to the point where,
if Russia suddenly gets another opportunity to pull the strings and
engage in a new “peaceful resolution”…

http://eng.expertclub.ge/portal/cnid__10984/alias__Expertclub/lang__en/tabid__2546/default.aspx

BAKU: Russian Deputy FM, U.S. Ambassador Discuss Situation In South

RUSSIAN DEPUTY FM, U.S. AMBASSADOR DISCUSS SITUATION IN SOUTH CAUCASUS

Trend
Feb 7 2012
Azerbaijan

Secretary of State, Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Grigory Karasin
received U.S. Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul at his request on
Feb.6, the Ministry’s website reported.

During the meeting the sides discussed issues on the international
agenda, including the situation in the South Caucasus and Central Asia,
the report said.

Michael McFaul, newly appointed U.S. ambassador to Russia, assumed
his office in January.

The U.S. and Russia are co-chair countries of the OSCE Minsk Group
on resolving Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. –
are currently holding the peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

La Majorite Au Parlement Va Bloquer Un Projet De Loi De L’opposition

LA MAJORITE AU PARLEMENT VA BLOQUER UN PROJET DE LOI DE L’OPPOSITION
Stephane

armenews.com
mercredi 8 fevrier 2012

La majorite progouvernementale au Parlement armenien rejettera une
proposition de l’opposition visant a faire tenir les prochaines
elections parlementaires uniquement sur la base de liste de parti a
annonce un depute du parti Republicain (HHK).

Hovannes Sahakian a dit que la coalition au pouvoir a pris ” la
decision politique ” de ne pas faire davantage de changements au
Code Electoral avant les elections prevues en mai. Il a repete les
assurances des representants du HHK que le code permettra de justes
elections.

Selon la loi actuelle, seules 90 places seront distribues sur la
base de liste de parti. Le reste des 41 sièges de deputes devant etre
distribue sur une base individuelle.

Armen Rustamian, un des leaders du parti Dashnaktsutyun, a dit au
service armenien de RFE/RL (Azatutyun.am) que son parti et le parti
Zharangutyun deposeront les amendements correspondants et les incluront
bientôt a l’ordre du jour du Parlement.

Hovannes Sahakian a fait comprendre, cependant, que la majorite au
Parlement est prete pour un tel debat et qu’elle bloquera le projet
de loi de l’opposition. Il a ecarte les arguments de l’opposition
affirmant que la fraude est particulierment repandue lors des elections
qui se tiennent dans des circonscriptions electorales a mandat simple.

Il a aussi pretendu que le projet de loi de l’opposition est
inconstitutionnel. ” Actuellement il existe des obstacles pour passer
a un système de representation proportionnel complet ” a-t-il dit
lors d’une conference de presse. ” Tout d’abord, des changements
doivent intervenir dans la constitution avant la modification du Code
Electoral. C’est presque impossible de le faire en termes pratiques “.

L’UAF A Livre 19 Millions De $ D’Aide a L’Armenie En 9 Premiers Mois

L’UAF A LIVRE 19 MILLIONS DE $ D’AIDE A L’ARMENIE EN 9 PREMIERS MOIS DE 2011
Stephane

armenews.com
mercredi 8 fevrier 2012

Le Fonds Uni Armenien a livre 19 millions de $ d’aide humanitaire a
l’Armenie de janvier a septembre 2011.

L’UAF a lui-meme rassemble 10,5 millions de $ de medicaments et autres
materiaux transmis par des ONG de charite dont AmeriCares (5,1 million
de $), Catholic Medical Mission Board (3.3 millions de $), Direct
Relief International (1 million de $), Hope for the City (533000 de
$), Health Partners International of Canada (243000 de $), Jezreel
International (176000 de $), and Feed the Children Fund (121000 de $).