"They Can Do Nothing Else"

"THEY CAN DO NOTHING ELSE"

A1+
[06:49 pm] 03 June, 2008

The first meeting between Serzh Sargssian and Ilham Aliyev is to be
held in Saint Petersburg on 6 June in the framework of the non-official
summit of the CIS countries. Politicians Alexander Iskandarian and
Aghasi Yenokian do not expect much from the meeting.

"Serzh Sargssian must get involved in the process as he has never
been direct participant in the process of the negotiations. In
this respect demonstrating a tough position will not sound
natural. Wait-and-see policy should be adopted now", Politician
Aghasi Yenokian told "A1+". According to him, Aliyev has received
dividends in connection with the inner political situation in Armenia,
as Armenia’s international rating seriously suffered as a result of
the post-election events. Besides Aliyev is getting ready for his
campaign and will adopt an aggressive position in this respect.

"Will Serzh Sargssian stick to Robert Kocharian’s achievements or will
he give a new start to the negotiations?" asked "A1+". "Kocharian’s
team, which includes Serzh Sargssian, has never been able to work out
an alternative policy. They can do nothing else and have to stick to
it no matter they like it or not", declared Yenokian.

Concerning the restitution of liberated lands Yenokian notices: "It is
early to speak over the issue and it has objective reasons. Armenia is
not ready to restitute the lands; Azerbaijan is not ready to sacrifice
anything in return."

"I cannot see any reason for progress in the negotiation processes",
declared Alexander Iskandarian. "One or two meetings are not enough
for a progress. How can we expect developments in such a short period
if nothing has been changed for the past half year?" Iskandarian
concluded.

Hayastan All-Armenian Fund Board of Trustees Gathers for Annual Mtg

PRESS RELEASE
The Armenia Fund
Governmental Buiding 3, Yerevan, RA
Contact: Hasmik Grigoryan
Tel: +(3741) 56 01 06 ext. 105
Fax: +(3741) 52 15 05
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: June, 2008

Hayastan All-Armenian Fund Board of Trustees Gathers for its Annual Meeting

Yerevan, June 2, 2008 – Hayastan All-Armenian Fund gathered for its annual
board of trustees’ meeting on May 27, 2008 at the Government House of
Receptions in Yerevan.
The newly elected President Serzh Sargsyan convened the 17th meeting of the
Fund and introduced the new member trustees to the board: President of
Nagorno Karabakh Bako Sahakyan, Prime Ministers of Armenia and Nagorno
Karabakh Tigran Sargsyan and Araik Harutyunyan, Ministers Eduard Nalbandyan
(represented by the deputy minister Gegham Gharibjanyan at the meeting) and
Tigran Davtyan attended the Fund’s annual meeting as ex officio members of
the board. Ramkavar Liberal-Democratic Party was represented in the board by
George Manoukian.
Chairmen and members of the Fund’s local committees, employees of the
executive board attended the meeting along with the board members.
In acknowledgement of their valuable contribution to Armenia’s well being
President Serzh Sargsyan awarded Mr. Weidemann (Germany), Mikael Baghdasarov
(Armenia), ACBA-CREDIT AGRICOLE Bank, Ardshininvestbank, Karabakh Telecom,
VivaCell mobile operator with certificates.
The Board approved the Fund’s Executive Director Vahe Aghabegians’ report on
the Fund’s activities over the last year.
"In 2007, the Fund continued realizing initiatives aimed at addressing the
most pressing issues that our compatriots living in Armenia and Artsakh face
today. The spectrum of projects covered by the Fund included social and
general infrastructure renovation, installation and modernization
initiatives.I would still like to single out several notable initiatives,
particularly the completion of over 30km long Martakert water pipeline. From
the ongoing projects, I would like to single out the construction of Hadrut
gas pipeline, the reconstruction of the Hadrut community hospital, as well
as renovation of Artsakh’s Togh village school. I am also happy to make
special notice of an assistance agreement reached with the government of
Karabakh, according to which, work has already commenced on unfinished
sections of the North South Highway", said the executive director in his
speech.

Vahe Aghabegians made his recommendations on how the Fund’s work can be made
more efficient, and namely, by increasing the fundraising capacity of the
Fund, as well as by amending its existing policy and guidelines, including
the charter of the Fund.

"Today, Hayastan All-Armenian Fund is a fully operational structure with
extensive experience and a sixteen year history of accomplishment. Still, as
every functioning organism, it too needs to develop and evolve to be better
suited to effectively address the new, more complex challenges that we
currently face", Vahe Aghabegians said.
Full summary of the maintenance monitoring results for the Fund’s projects
for 2002-2007 was introduced to the board as part of the tasks the Fund
executive board was assigned to accomplish at the board meeting last year.
The Rural Development Program in Karabakh and Armenia adopted by the Fund
Board of Trustees meeting in June 2007 will remain the Fund’s principal
course of activity as well as the target of its upcoming telethon in
November. The program will continue to support the Armenian and Karabakh
governments’ current national policy in order to meet a wider set of needs
in the socio-economic field and provide integral solutions to poverty
reduction in the country.
###

Hayastan All-Armenian Fund

http://www.himnadram.org/02

Nalbandian: Armenia Attaches Importance To Its Presidency In CSTO

NALBANDIAN: ARMENIA ATTACHES IMPORTANCE TO ITS PRESIDENCY IN CSTO

PanARMENIAN.Net
02.06.2008 14:12 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia’s Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian met
Saturday with CSTO Secretary General Nikolay Bordyuzha to discuss
urgent problems and the Organization’s foreign policy and security,
the RA MFA press office reported.

The officials referred to Armenia’s future presidency in the CSTO and
the events to be held during the period. "Armenia attaches importance
to its presidency in CSTO. As a country presiding in the CSTO,
Armenia will work to cement cooperation between the member states,"
Minister Nalbandian said.

On the same day, the Armenian Minister met with chairman of the State
Duma committee on CIS affairs Alexey Ostrovsky to discuss perspectives
of CIS development, the Nagorno Karabkh conflict and regional security.

"Armenia is interested in development of relations between the CIS
member states," Mr Nalbandian remarked.

RPA Deputy Chairman: Zhirayr Sefilyan Will Not Be Expelled Outside O

RPA DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: ZHIRAYR SEFILYAN WILL NOT BE EXPELLED OUTSIDE OF ARMENIA WITHOUT ANY LEGAL GROUNDS

arminfo
2008-06-02 13:28:00

ArmInfo. ‘Commander of the Shushi battalion, Head of the "In Protection
of Liberated Territories" organization Zhirayr Sefilyan will not be
expelled outside of Armenia if there are no serious legal grounds
for that, deputy Chairman of the Republican party of Armenia, RA
parliamentarian Galust Sahakyan said at today’s press-conference in
"Mirror" club.

To recall, the term of imprisonment of Z. Sefilyan, being under arrest
and sentenced to one and a half year of imprisonment per Article
"Illegal storage of arms", expires on June 9.

Armenia Expects Talks On Gas Prices In 2009-2011 To Conclude By Autu

ARMENIA EXPECTS TALKS ON GAS PRICES IN 2009-2011 TO CONCLUDE BY AUTUMN

Interfax News Agency
May 27 2008
Russia

Armenia expects to conclude talks with Gazprom (RTS: GAZP) on the
price of gas deliveries in 2009-2011 over the coming two-three months,
Energy and Natural Resources Minister Armen Movsiyan told journalists
on Tuesday.

A working group from Moscow is currently in Armenia to discuss the
gas price. "We are trying to agree our approaches over the next few
years on the prices for gas," he said.

Armenia will pay $110 per 1,000 cubic meters for gas from Gazprom to
the end of 2008. Gazprom has proposed raising the price in 2009 to
$165 per 1,000 cubic meters.

President Sarkisian receives rep of Jewish Committee of America

ARMENPRESS

PRESIDENT SERZH SARKISIAN RECEIVES REPRESENTATIVE OF
JEWISH COMMITTEE OF AMERICA, AMBASSADOR PETER
ROSENBLAT

YEREVAN, MAY 29, ARMENPRESS: President Serzh
Sarkisian received today a representative of the
Jewish Committee of America, ambassador Peter
Rosenblatt, Barry Jeitobs, the Jewish Committee of
America’s director for strategic studies, and Ross
Vartian, the executive director of the
American-Armenian Public Committee.
The presidential press service quoted Serzh
Sarkisian as saying that Armenia is interested in
deepening relationships with the USA regarding it as
an important guarantee of economic success, democratic
advancement and regional stability.
Ambassador Rosenblatt was quoted as saying that the
Jewish Committee of America is one of the leading
organizations of the Jewish community of USA being
actively involved in international relations.
He said also that beginning since 1990-s they are
paying greater attention to the South Caucasian region
watching closely all processes and developments taking
place here. He said representatives of the Committee
visited Armenia last in 1999.
Peter Rosenblatt attributed the interest of the
Jewish Committee of America in Armenia and
Armenia-related issues to close ties with the Armenian
community of the USA.
The press service said the focus of their
conversation was largely on Armenian-Turkish relations
and the opening of the border.
President Serzh Sarkisian once again stressed that
Armenia is interested in building natural
relationships with all its neighbors, adding also that
the official Yerevan has many time come out for
unconditional normalization of ties with Ankara.
The presidential press office said they also
exchanged ideas on Israel-Armenia relationships.

Baku’s position on Nagorno Karabakh remains unchanged

Regnum News Agency, Russia
May 29 2008

Baku’s position on Nagorno Karabakh remains unchanged

Azerbaijan’s principal position is to restore control over the
situation in Nagorno Karabakh, Azerbaijan’s Deputy Foreign Minister
Araz Azimov said talking to reporters. According to him, from the
Azerbaijani’s side a compromise is possible, if the communities living
in Nagorno Karabakh are granted self-government status.

`The compromise Azerbaijani is ready for is significant. In this
connection, we expect reciprocal compromises from the other side. In
this respect, Armenia must give up its position envisaging alienation
of Nagorno Karabakh from Azerbaijan,’ Azimov is quoted as saying by
Azeri agencies. According to Azimov, only in this case the country can
come to a common solution. At the same time, the deputy foreign
minister said that Armenia’s position was unacceptable from the point
of view of the international law and no country in the world has
supported its position on Nagorno Karabakh until now. `Acknowledgement
of this in Yerevan will have great significance,’ he concluded.

Slovak Minister on Armenian Genocide on eve of Turk’s visit

Czech News Agency
May 27, 2008 Tuesday

SLOVAK MINISTER ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ON THE EVE TURK’S VISIT

Bratislava, May 27 (CTK) – Slovak Justice Minister Stefan Harabin
spoke about the Armenian genocide in the former Ottoman Empire on his
visit to Armenia, a mere one day ahead of a visit of Turkish Foreign
Minister Ali Babacan to Slovakia. Turkey has in the long run dismissed
having exposed Armenians on its territory to genocide during World War
One. Harabin spoke about the genocide with Armenian Patriarch Karekin
II who "…highly praised the activities of the Justice Minister who
proposes to punish denying any genocide, including the genocide of
Armenians," Harabin’s spokesman Michal Jurci told CTK.

The denying of the killings of Jews during World War Two is only
punishable in Slovakia now. The Justice Ministry has drafted an
amendment to the penal law that introduces punishments for denying
other genocides, including the Armenian. In Turkey, on the contrary,
hundreds of people have been punished for having labelled the
massacres of Armenians as genocide which is at variance with the
official opinion. The controversial law was only mitigated recently
within Turkey’s effort to join the European Union. Jurci said
Harabin’s trip to Armenia did not have any connection with the planned
visit by the Turkish minister to Slovakia. The Slovak Foreign Ministry
would not comment on Harabin’s visit. The ministry’s spokesman Jan
Skoda said Slovak diplomacy will not open the Armenian genocide in
talks with the Turkish Foreign Minister. He, nevertheless, recalled
that Slovak parliament passed in 2004 already a resolution that
describes the Armenian genocide as a crime against humanity. The
Turkish embassy in Bratislava would not comment on Harabin’s
statements in Armenia either. Can Onder, the embassy’s first
counsellor, told CTK, however, that the controversial periods of
history should be left to historians to deal with. The Turkish embassy
has for some time been trying to make Bratislava’s Petrzalka
neighbourhood remove a memorial to some 1.5 million Armenians who
became victim to the genocide. Ankara consistently dismisses the term
genocide and says the death of Armenians in 1915-17 was caused by war,
uprising and hunger. ms/mr/hol

Lusakert Poultry Factory Considered Entity with Dominating Position

LUSAKERT POULTRY FACTORY CONSIDERED AS ENTITY WITH DOMINATING POSITION
ONCE AGAIN

YEREVAN, MAY 27, NOYAN TAPAN. At the May 27 sitting, the RA State
Commission on Protection of Economic Competition considered Dvin
Holding – Azotinvest group as an entity with a dominating position in
the nitrogent fertilizer market and put it on the register of economic
entities with a dominating position. By a 2004 decision of the
Commission, Dvin Holding was also recognized as an entity having a
dominating position in the indicated market.

The studies in 2007 showed that last year 4 economic entities operating
in the indicated market imported 25.2 tons of nitrogen fertilizer into
Armenia and sold 32.7 tons in the country.

By another decision of the Commission, Lusakert Poultry Factory was
once again considered as an entity with a dominating position. The
company was recognized an entity with a dominating position in 2003 as
well, whereas in March 2007, the company applied to the Commission with
the request to revise its decision on its dominating position as some
changes had occurred in the market.

According to a study, in 2007 1.8 mln eggs were imported into Armenia,
219.8 mln eggs were produced by 11 economic entities, sales made 206.6
million, exports – 2.02 million. The following 3 economic entities had
the largest shares in sales: Lusakert Poultry Factory (42.5%), Arzni
Poultry Factory (29.7%) and Yerevan Poultry Factory (13.7%). Thus
Lusakert Poultry Factory retained its dominating position. However,
during the Commission’s sitting, the representative of the company
asked to postpone the discussion as he intends to present some
important data. The discussion of the issue has been postponed.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=113862

Book Reviews: Politics & Power

Reform Judaism, NY
May 27 2008

Book Reviews: Politics & Power

Ronald Florence recreates the Middle East in the First World
War… Ruth Wisse examines the Jewish ambivalence to power… by Bonny
V. Fetterman Lawrence and Aaronsohn:

T. E. Lawrence, Aaron Aaronsohn, and the Seeds of the Arab-Israeli Conflict
by Ronald Florence
(Viking, 512 pp., $27.95)

For anyone who thinks the Arab-Israeli conflict started with Israel’s
War of Independence in 1948, Ronald Florence’s history of the Middle
East during World War I is an important corrective. It takes us back
to a time when none of the borders we now recognize on the map
existed-only a vast region called `Arabia’ held by the Ottoman
Turks. Florence tells this story through the biographies of two men
who tried to help the British wrest this area from Turkey and win the
war.

T. E. Lawrence (later known as `Lawrence of Arabia’), an
Oxford-trained archaeologist, was a young second lieutenant attached
to the British intelligence desk in Cairo. In the spring of 1917 he
tried to organize the army of Bedouin irregulars (called the Army of
the Arab Revolt) under the Hashemite Emir Faisal for a raid against
Turkey at Aqaba. Faisal’s father, Sherif Hussein, the religious ruler
of the Hejaz (which included the holy cities of Mecca and Medina)
envisioned a new Arab caliphate on the ruins of the Ottoman Empire;
Faisal himself had eyes on an extensive kingdom based in
Damascus. Lawrence hoped that a successful raid on Aqaba would serve
their political aspirations, despite British colonial designs in the
region and wartime agreements with the French.

Meanwhile, Aaron Aaronsohn, a Palestinian Jew and an internationally
known agronomist (his parents were among the founders of Zichron
Ya’akov when they came from Romania in 1882), was convinced that the
Jews of Palestine would fare better under Britain than Turkey. Fearing
that Jews would suffer the same fate as the Armenians under the Turks,
he offered his considerable skills to the British. Giving up his
scientific career, he converted his research institute in Athlit, the
Jewish Agricultural Experiment Station, into a spy ring for the
British (called NILI). Aaronsohn knew every inch of Palestine, having
served Turkish commander Djemal Pasha as a scientific consultant
during the locust invasion (a crop-destroying insect infestation); he
recommended the plan of attack through Beersheva that General Allenby
ultimately used to take Jerusalem in December 1917. At the war’s end,
Aaronsohn drafted a map of Palestine-not based on arbitrary borders,
but on topographical features that would permit the development of a
viable state. He carried this map with him when his plane went down in
the English Channel on his way to the Paris Peace Conference.

This gripping narrative captures so many facets of this history that
suspense remains high even though we know the outcome. The victors of
the Great War shaped the Middle East even as their conflicting
promises shaped its political future. The stories of Lawrence and
Aaronsohn remind us of a time of flux between the waning of the
Otto – man Empire and the birth of the modern Middle East.

Jews and Power
by Ruth R. Wisse
(Nextbook/Schocken, 231 pp., $19.95)

Harvard professor Ruth Wisse is less concerned with `Jewish power’
(whatever that is) than the relationship of Jews to power. With the
State of Israel, Jews once more have sovereignty, but Wisse asks, do
we have what it takes to keep it? In a climate of Israel-bashing, are
we capable of rising to our own self-defense? Or are we still
uncomfortable with the notion of power itself?

`The loss of Jewish sovereignty [in 70 C.E.] was the defining
political event in the life of the Jewish people,’ she writes. Over
the next 2,000 years, Jews developed other strategies for a stateless
survival in the Diaspora while rabbinic theology eschewed political
power. In the post-Emancipation era, Jewish sovereignty was even
regarded by some Jewish philosophers, like Hermann Cohen, as a burden
transcended, freeing Judaism for loftier ethical and moral concerns.

But the political mentality that sometimes served Jews well in the
Diaspora, Wisse argues, is not an appropriate strategy for a people
facing an existential threat. `Political thinkers normally include
national defense as part of their planning,’ she writes. `The Jews of
Europe had no such provision or strategy for their common defense at
the point when Hitler singled them out for extermination. Jews had
concentrated on their moral improvement with no political structure in
place to defend Jewish civilization or the children who were expected
to perpetuate it.’

Wisse’s polemic is a direct response to those who would challenge the
need for Jewish sovereignty, those who would seek to undo it, and
those who unwittingly support them. This last category includes Jews
and non-Jews who indulge in what she calls `the politics of
blame’-blaming Israel for the Palestinians’ plight in an attempt to
delegitimate Israel’s existence. Addressing this issue, she reminds
readers of Arab responsibility for the creation and perpetuation of
the refugee problem: `In denying the partition of Palestine, Arab
governments also refused to allow the resettlement of the
Palestinians, so that they could create perpetual evidence of Jewish
iniquity,’ she writes. `Israel could be charged for the suffering of
Palestinians only as long as their suffering could be sustained.’

`The `Arab-Israel conflict’ did not turn out to be-as so many people
still pretend it is-a normal territorial dispute between two claimants
to the same land,’ she asserts. `Rather, the Arab war against Israel
is an asymmetrical attack by the Arab-Islamic world on the idea of a
Jewish homeland.’ Wisse goes on to discuss the obsessional hatred
fueling anti-Israel politics, evident in the president of Iran calling
for the destruction of Israel at the U.N.

This slender volume identifies and forces us to confront a problem
larger and more insidious than a question of boundaries. It also gives
us pause to appreciate what Israel’s statehood means to us.

Bonny V. Fetterman is literary editor of Reform Judaism magazine.

dex.cfm?id=1363

http://reformjudaismmag.org/Articles/in