Author: Nanijanian Alex

PRESS RELEASE
National Association for Armenian Studies and Research
395 Concord Avenue
Belmont, MA 02478
Phone: 617-489-1610
E-mail: [email protected]
Contact: Marc A. Mamigonian

DR. INA MCCABE TO SPEAK AT NAASR ON “ARMENIANS AS A GLOBAL
ENTREPRENEURIAL NETWORK”

Dr. Ina Baghdiantz McCabe of Tufts University will give a lecture
entitled “The Armenians As a Global Entrepreneurial Network,” on
Thursday, March 23, at the National Association for Armenian Studies and
Research (NAASR) Center, 395 Concord Ave., Belmont, MA.

Dr. McCabe is the co-editor of the recent book Diaspora Entrepreneurial
Networks: Four Centuries of History (Berg Publishers) and the author of
one of the volume’s chapters dealing with the Armenians and the Eurasian
Silk Trade. Regarding this new book, Geoffrey Jones, Joseph C. Wilson
Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School,
writes: “Diaspora communities are important drivers of today’s global
economy. This highly original collection of essays reveals the rich
history of this phenomenon. The book opens up a new dimension of the
business history of globalization with fascinating studies of the roles
of Armenian, Greek, Jewish, Chinese and other entrepreneurial networks.”

Trade Diasporas an Understudied Area

National historiographies have masked the significance of
trade diasporas and their entrepreneurial networks, despite the fact
that they lay at the heart of the gradual integration of the world into
one global system. Contrary to many a current belief, the integration of
the world economy, the so-called globalization of modern economic life,
does not owe its present character solely to the actions (and omissions)
of the colonialism and imperialism of prominent western or eastern
powers.

The study of such networks, which often took the form of
ethnic trade diasporas, is becoming a vibrant field for economic,
business, political, and social historians, sociologists, and
economists. Historical diasporas -the three classical ones, the
Armenians, the Greeks and the

Jews-epitomize the resilience of older, traditional forms of certain
people that crossed national and imperial boundaries for centuries.

Dr. McCabe’s talk will focus on the Armenian network, the reasons for
its success, its modes of communication and commercial intelligence, the
socio-economic reasons for its resilience despite many catastrophic
circumstances, and the structural elements this network shared with
other successful diaspora networks.

Dr. Ina Baghdiantz McCabe holds the Hagop and Miriam Darakjian and
Boghos and Nazley Jafarian and Son Haig Chair in Armenian History at
Tufts University. She is the author of The Shah’s Silk for Europe’s
Silver: The Eurasian Silk Trade of the Julfan Armenians in Safavid Iran
and India (1590-1750) and the co-author of Slaves of the Shah: New
Elites of Isfahan.

The NAASR Bookstore will open at 7:30 p.m. Copies of Diaspora
Entrepreneurial Networks: Four Centuries of History will be on sale and
available for signing by the author.

The NAASR Center and Headquarters is located opposite the First Armenian
Church and next to the U.S. Post Office. Ample parking is available
around the building and in adjacent areas. The lecture will begin
promptly at 8:00 p.m.

More information about the lecture is available by calling 617-489-1610,
faxing 617-484-1759, e-mailing [email protected], or writing to NAASR, 395
Concord Ave., Belmont, MA 02478.

WITH A SOLID VICTORY AT LINARES, ARONIAN JOINS THE GAME’S ELITE
By Robert Byrne

The New York Times
March 19, 2006 Sunday
Late Edition – Final

In the final two rounds of the Linares tournament, which was held
in Morelia, Mexico, and Linares, Spain, Peter Leko of Hungary, the
leading player throughout, lost twice and dropped back to fourth
place with 7 1/2 points. Levon Aronian of Armenia kept up the most
hectic pace of all, finishing the last round with a sizzling victory
over Leko and a total of 8 1/2 for first place.

Tied for second, with 8 points, were Teimour Radjabov of Azerbaijan
and Veselin Topalov of Bulgaria, who is in negotiations for a world
championship match in the fall with Vladimir Kramnik of Russia. After
Topalov lost three of the first six games, he buckled down. Quite a
heroic performance under such adverse circumstances.

In Aronian’s final-round victory against Leko, he looked as though he
was going to play passively for a draw, but then produced an attack
with a spirited counter to the Anti-Marshall Ruy Lopez.

Aronian turned the Ruy Lopez upside down. It is Black who is supposed
to endure the Spanish Torture, but this time it was White whose trees
were felled by lightning. It was a great moment for him, as he took
on the role of pathfinder in an old opening.

Somehow Leko staggered into an endgame. It was hopeless, and Aronian
made it even more so by precision play that brooked no resistance. He
was not going to let this tournament victory get away from him.

In his other games, Aronian also played spiritedly, forcing his
opponents to defend against breathtaking gambits. This was his greatest
success so far, and he must now be welcomed into the inner circle of
players who have a right to eye the world championship.

After 7 Bb3 0-0, since 8 c3 can run into the tempestuous Marshall
Attack with 8 d5!?, Leko chose an Anti-Marshall Attack with 8 a4.

Supposedly this avoids risks.

After 13 Kh8, playing 14 d4 Nd4 15 Nd4 ed 16 Qd4 Rd8 17 Ne3 c5 18 Qd3
d5 would have given Aronian the initiative, but it was the best Leko
could have done.

Leko’s 17 Ba4 was inaccurate. He should have played 17 ef Rf5 18 Bd2.

With 20 Ng6, the black pieces were bearing down on the kingside,
but the white pieces had no targets.

Leko’s 22 Ra2 was a purely defensive move, but he had to guard his
king position.

With 22 Qb7, Aronian attacked the kingside and the queenside
simultaneously, in the best Alekhine style.

With 24 Nd3, 25 Qd3 Qc4, Aronian won a decisive pawn, and the endgame
was his.

Finally, after 40 Reh3, Leko gave up.

White Black Leko Aronian 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4 Ba4 Nf6 5 0-0
Be7 6 Re1 b5 7 Bb3 0-0 8 a4 b4 9 d3 d6 10 a5 Be6 11 Nbd2 Qc8 12 Nc4
Rb8 13 Bg5 Kh8 14 h3 Ng8 15 c3 bc 16 bc f5 17 Ba4 fe 18 Bc6 ef 19 Be7
Ne7 20 Bf3 Ng6 21 Bg4 Nf4 22 Ra2 Qb7 23 Bf3 Qb3 24 Rc2 Nd3 25 Qd3 Qc4
26 Qc4 Bc4 27 Bc6 Rb3 28 g3 g5 29 Re3 Ra3 30 Be4 Ra5 31 g4 Bd5 32 f3
Be4 33 fe Ra1 34 Kg2 Rff1 35 Ree2 Rg1 36 Kh2 Rh1 37 Kg3 Rag1 38 Rg2
Re1 39 Rgf2 Re3 40 Kg2 Reh3 41 Resigns.

AZG Armenian Daily #049, 18/03/2006

Neighbors

TURKEY TO LAUNCH TELECOM SATELLITE IN 2008

Turkish satellite operator has ordered a new French-built
communications satellite that will be launched in 2008.

The Alcatel Spacebus 4000 will be dubbed Turksat 3A and will provide
telecom and television broadcast service in Turkey and parts of Europe
and Central Asia.

The spacecraft will replace the current Turksat 1C and will be fitted
with 24Ku-band transponders with 8 kilowatts of power.

Alcatel has built five previous satellites for Turksat.

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
03/17/2006
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ. COM

1) Turkey Has Less Than Two Years to Meet EU’s Political Accession Criteria
2) Fifty House Members Call on Foreign Aid Appropriators to Maintain Military
Aid Parity to Armenia And Azerbaijan
3) US Urges Turkey to Open Border with Armenia
4) Armenian Organizations Demand Introduction of Armenian as State Language
5) Authorities in Tabriz Assure Normalization of Situation
6) Courts Allow Turkish Demonstration in Berlin
7) ANCA Joins Armenian Bar Association-Led Coalition in Fighting Armenian
Genocide Denial in Massachusetts
8) Burbank ANC Organizes Armenian Genocide Art And Essay Contest
9) Armenian Genocide Documentary to Be Honored at 2006 Midwest Journalism
Conference in April
10) Armenia Fund Reconstructs Artik Hospital
11) Third Pan-Armenian Writers’ Conference to Be Held in Antelias
12) Element Band Presents Armenian CD Yev O Phe
13) Critics’ Forum: Visual Arts: By Ara Oshagan

1) Turkey Has Less Than Two Years to Meet EU’s Political Accession Criteria

BRUSSELS–Noting the slowing pace of reform in Turkey, the European Parliament
has called on the Turkish government to take immediate steps to ends its
discriminatory and repressive policies.
In its recently adopted resolution on the “Commission’s 2005 Enlargement
Strategy Report,” the Parliament called on the European Commission to define
the geographical boundaries of the European Union. This report, prepared by
Elmar Brok, a Conservative from Germany, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs
Committee, aims to formulate a comprehensive enlargement policy before
focusing
on candidate nations (Macedonia, Western Balkans) and countries in negotiation
(Turkey, Croatia).
In the section of the report dedicated to Turkey, the European Parliament
states that the priorities outlined in the Accession Partnership “have to be
accomplished in the first phase of the negotiations” and “notes with
satisfaction that the Commission now supports this view as well by stating
that
those criteria have to be fulfilled within one or two years.”
Based on these considerations, the Parliament therefore called on Turkey “to
present as soon as possible a plan, including a timetable and specific
measures, to meet these deadlines,” and urged the Commission and the Council
“to make the progress of the negotiations conditional on the timely
accomplishment of those priorities.”
This demand comes in reaction to the slowing down of Turkey’s reforms, which
were noted in the resolution. The Parliament also formally asked Turkey “to
remove all existing legislative and practical obstacles to full enjoyment of
fundamental rights and freedoms by all Turkish citizens, notably freedom of
expression, religious freedom, cultural rights and the rights of minorities.”
The Resolution also urged the Commission “to conduct a rigorous and thorough
scrutiny of developments on the ground.”
The adopted text–for the first time in European Union history–also recalled
that “the capacity for absorption of the Union…remains one of the conditions
for the accession of new countries” and stressed that “defining the nature of
the European Union, including its geographical borders, is fundamental to
understanding the concept of absorption capacity.”
Thus, the Parliament requested that that Commission submit a report by
December 31, 2006 “setting out the principles which underpin this concept” and
invites it “to factor this element into the overall negotiation timetable.”
“We welcome the adoption of this resolution as a true expression of the
growing will of the European Parliament to be involved in the Union’s
decision-making processes. This measure–like the many previously adopted
resolutions on this matter–urges the European Commission and Council to
not be
satisfied with pledges and prolonged delays, but rather to demand genuine
reforms in Turkey,” said Hilda Tchoboian, Chairperson of the European Armenian
Federation.
“We are working with European democratic movements in order to require that
Turkey meet its criteria within the next two years–including its full
recognition of the Armenian genocide and the abandonment of its aggressive
policies toward Armenia.”

2) Fifty House Members Call on Foreign Aid Appropriators to Maintain Military
Aid Parity to Armenia And Azerbaijan

WASHINGTON, DCCongressmen Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and George Radanovich (R-CA)
were joined by forty-eight of their House colleagues today in urging the
leadership of the House Foreign Operations Subcommittee to support
pro-Armenian
provisions in the fiscal year 2007 foreign aid bill, reported the Armenian
National Committee of America (ANCA).
Members of Congress cosigned a letter, addressed to the panel’s Chairman Jim
Kolbe (R-AZ) and Ranking Member Nita Lowey (D-NY), which would strengthen the
hand of pro-Armenian members of the Subcommittee, most notably Armenian Caucus
Co-Chairman Joe Knollenberg, Steve Rothman (D-NJ), Mark Kirk (R-IL), and John
Sweeney (R-NY). Representative Sweeney, who joined the panel last year, is one
of only two Members of Congress of Armenian heritage.
The letter notes that members of Congress are “deeply troubled” that the
Administration’s request for military aid for Azerbaijan is considerably
higher
then the request for Armenia. By signing the letter, legislators will add
their
voice to the effort to ensure that the agreement struck in 2001 between the
White House and Congress to keep aid levels to these two countries equal is
fully respected. In addition, the letter calls for a hard earmark of at least
$75 million for Armenia, a one-year $5 million allocation for Karabagh, and
the
preservation of Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act.
Members of Congress joining Representatives Pallone and Radanovich in
cosigning the letter included: Reps. Tom Allen (D-ME), Robert Andrews (D-NJ),
Xavier Becerra (D-CA), Howard Berman (D-CA), Michael Bilirakis (R-FL), Eric
Cantor (R-VA), Lois Capps (D-CA), Dennis Cardoza (D-CA), John Conyers (D-MI),
Jim Costa (D-CA), Joseph Crowley (D-NY), William Delahunt (D-MA), David Dreier
(R-CA), Chaka Fattah (D-PA), Mike Ferguson (R-NJ), Barney Frank (D-MA), Scott
Garrett (R-NJ), Rush Holt (D-NJ), Michael Honda (D-CA), Dale Kildee (D-MI),
James Langevin (D-RI), Sander Levin (D-MI), Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Stephen
Lynch (D-MA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Edward Markey (D-MA), Doris Matsui
(D-CA), Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI), James McGovern (D-MA), John McHugh (R-NY),
Michael McNulty (D-NY), Martin Meehan (D-MA), Grace Napolitano (D-CA), Donald
Payne (D-NJ), Collin Peterson (D-MN), Bobby Rush (D-IL), H. James Saxton
(R-NJ), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Joe Schwarz (R-MI), Christopher Shays (R-CT), Brad
Sherman (D-CA), Rob Simmons (R-CT), Mark Souder (R-IN), Edolphus Towns (D-NY),
Diane Watson (D-CA), Henry Waxman (D-CA), Anthony Weiner (D-NY), and Lynn
Woolsey (D-CA).
Representatives Knollenberg, Pallone, and Rothman also submitted individual
letters citing their foreign aid priorities for Armenia and Karabagh, among
other countries.
The House Foreign Operations panel is set to review the FY 2007 foreign aid
bill, which will then be considered by the full Appropriations Committee and
then the full US House of Representatives. The Senate will finalize its own
version, which will be reconciled with the House bill by a conference
committee.

3) US Urges Turkey to Open Border with Armenia

ANKARA (Armenpress)–US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian
Affairs Daniel Fried and the OSCE Minsk Group US Co-Chair Steven Mann met in
Turkey Friday with Turkish officials to discuss the Karabagh conflict
settlement, Ankara-Yerevan relations, and energy issues.
During the meeting, Fried urged Turkey to open up its border with Armenia
as a
step toward normalization of relations between the two countries, Anatolia
News
Agency reported.
Fried said that the opening of the border between Armenia and Turkey will be
beneficial for the two countries and the whole region. He said US will support
it.
The Turkish side refused, saying that it defends Azerbaijan and will not open
its border with Armenia unless progress is made in the Karabagh conflict and
Armenia steps back from its demand for recognition of the Armenian genocide.
Referring to the Armenian genocide, Fried said that Turkey should seriously
recognize the mistakes it has made in the past.
Fried said, “The tragedies should be recognized. People must be truly and
bravely interested in the issue. At the same time it is necessary to think of
the future of the two nations.”
The US official also discussed with Turkish officials Iran’s nuclear program
and the Cyprus issue. Turkey and the United States share concern over the
Iranian nuclear issue, but officials from both sides agree that it should be
resolved through diplomatic means, Anatolia said.

4) Armenian Organizations Demand Introduction of Armenian as State Language

AKHALKALAK (Armenpress)The Virk and Javakhk organizations, which are based in
the Armenian populated Georgian region of Javakhk, have demanded that Armenian
receive the status of a second state language in the region.
The organizations prepared a letter of appeal to the Georgian Parliament at a
Thursday meeting in Akhalkalak.
According to them, since the majority of the local population is of Armenian
origin, they must be able to conduct official business in the Armenian
language.
Representatives of Virk and Javakhk also point out that Armenians already
suffer frequent discrimination because of their ethnicity. They say Armenians
are not hired as public officers and are often replaced by Georgians who come
to Javakhk from other regions of Georgia.

5) Authorities in Tabriz Assure Normalization of Situation

TEHRAN (Alik)–An Azeri satellite television station operating in Iran has
been
disseminating Anti-Armenian propaganda and calling on the local population to
engage in anti-Armenian demonstrations. Kevork Vardanian, Iranian Member of
Parliament representing the Northern Iran Armenian community, went to Tabriz
last Tuesday to check on the hostile situation created by the Azeri TV
station.
Vardanian has also been in touch with the governor’s and interior minister’s
office in the meantime. He was assured that all the necessary security
measures
have been taken by the Iranian government to prevent an inter-ethnic clash
between the local Azeri population and the Armenian community.
“We were at the Prelacy until midnight and fortunately nothing happened. The
local security officials called me and the Prelate to assure us that the
situation is under control and nothing will happen. The most important thing,
however, is that the Armenian community of Tabriz is leading a normal life and
last week’s concerns have all disappeared,” he said.
Vardanian also informed that local authorities visited the church and assured
the public that “the security of the Armenian community is the responsibility
of the Iranian security apparatus and that they will guarantee that.”

6) Courts Allow Turkish Demonstration in Berlin

–Demonstrators cannot deny Genocide

The German Court of Appeals allowed on Friday a demonstration organized by
Turks against the recognition of the Armenian genocide and in honor of Talaat
Pasha to be held Saturday, March 18. The court has allowed the controversial
demonstration, but forbade demonstrators from denying the Genocide either
verbally or in writing.
The court also called on the police to strictly enforce this decision.
The Berlin Police Department wanted the demonstration to be banned completely
because they feared violence would erupt and because they suspected
demonstrators would try to both deny and glorify the Armenian genocide.

7) ANCA Joins Armenian Bar Association-Led Coalition in Fighting Armenian
Genocide Denial in Massachusetts

WASHINGTON, DC–The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) has joined
with a broad coalition of civil rights organizations in filing an amicus
curiae
(friend of the court) brief in Massachusetts Federal District Court to oppose
attempts by the Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA) to mandate
the
inclusion of Armenian genocide denial material in Massachusetts’ genocide
curriculum guide.
The coalition led by the Armenian Bar Association, also includes the Irish
Immigration Center, the Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action, and the
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
In support of the State of Massachusetts, the coalition filed its brief on
March 8 urging the dismissal of the complaint filed by the ATAA, a lobbying
group that actively denies the Armenian genocide and is calling for the
inclusion of the ATAA website in a list of educational sources provided as
part
of a teacher’s guide on genocide education. The complaint also calls for the
addition of other websites, including that of the Embassy of the Republic of
Turkey, which the ATAA had lobbied to include in the guide. These website were
disqualified from the guide because they denied the Armenian genocide,
contradicting the Massachusetts statute that requires the teaching of the
Armenian genocide.
In filing the brief, coalition members expressed their opposition to the
inclusion of genocide denial material in Massachusetts’ curriculum guide and
refuted allegations that plaintiffs’ free speech rights were violated. The
brief argues, “This case is not about Plaintiffs’ ability to express
themselves, to receive ideas, or to access information. Nothing in the
Massachusetts Guide to Choosing and Using Curricular Materials on Genocide and
Human Rights has altered those rights. Rather, this case involves
[Massachusetts’] right as a government to express its own official views on
matters of historical importance and their place in education and to choose
the
specific content of its own message.” Citing judicial precedent, the brief
noted that courts cannot compel state governments to speak as plaintiffs
demand: “The government is entitled to full control over its own speech,
whether it speaks with its own voice or enlists private parties to convey its
message, and the remedy for dissatisfaction with its choices is political
rather than judicial.”
To read the entire brief, visit:
ae.pdf

8) Burbank ANC Organizes Armenian Genocide Art And Essay Contest

In the spirit of “learning from the past, shaping our future,” the Armenian
National Committee (ANC) of Burbank has organized an essay and art contest to
commemorate and learn from the Armenian genocide of 1915-1923.
The contests officially began in early March with the help of more than 80
English, Art, and History teachers from the Burbank Unified School District.
Contest packets were distributed to teachers and student. Students in grades
10-12 were invited to take part in either the art or essay contest with the
theme, “Learning From The Past, Shaping Our Future: What does the Armenian
genocide mean to me?” Using any form of visual media or their own original
writing, participating students of all ethnic backgrounds will have the
opportunity to creatively express their thoughts and feelings about the impact
of the Armenian genocide.
“Our goal is to create an understanding among youth that this crime against
the Armenians is not just past history and it still has a real impact on our
lives today” said Tamar Krekorian, head of the Genocide Commemoration
Committee
of the Burbank ANC. “Through this contest, young people will learn the
continuing lessons of the Armenian genocide and will be prepared to work
together to prevent future atrocities.”
The Burbank ANC is also collaborating with a long time friend, the Burbank
Public Library. The contests, running through March 24, 2006, will culminate
in an award ceremony Saturday, April 1 at the Burbank Central Library.
Student
art will be on display and excerpts from winning essays will be read. Three
winners for each contest will be awarded cash prizes. Representatives of the
City of Burbank and the Burbank Unified School District present the winners
with their prizes. The event is open to the public. For more information on
the contest, visit <;www.burbankanc.o rg.

9) Armenian Genocide Documentary to Be Honored at 2006 Midwest Journalism
Conference in April

A Regional Emmy nominated documentary about the Armenian genocide, The
Armenian
Genocide: 90 Years Later, will be honored at the 2006 Midwest Journalism
Conference in Bloomington, Minnesota. The event, which is sponsored by the
Northwest Broadcast News Association in memory of journalist Eric Sevareid,
will take place April 1.
As part of an ongoing series by the Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies
in Minnesota (CHGS) about genocide and its lingering effects, [The Armenian
Genocide: 90 Years Later] aired on public television in Minnesota last April
and was nominated for the 2005 Regional Emmy in the category of “Best News
Special.”
The documentary, which is being honored in the Talk and Public Affairs
category, discusses events that led to the Genocide, issues related to
Genocide
recognition, and its effects on Turkish democracy. The film also addresses
current issues about revisionism and the repression of viewpoints that deviate
from the official position in Turkey.
The program discusses this phenomenon and raises questions about how the
issue
of the recognition of the Armenian genocide fits into the context of
understanding the current status of Turkish democracy, academic freedom in
universities, and issues involving language and identity for minorities. Most
poignant in the program is the testimony of those whose family members
survived
the Genocide and lived to tell about it. They discuss how the memory of the
Genocide is embedded in the identity of many Armenians.
Discussants include Taner Akçam, Stephen Feinstein, and Eric Weitz, from the
University of Minnesota, as well as descendants of survivors, and members of
the community who explore issues related to the genocide.
The documentary is a co-production of Twin Cities Public Television and the
University of Minnesota Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, (CHGS) and
is distributed by the Armenian Genocide Resource Center in Richmond California
through a special arrangement with CHGS.
The Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies in Minnesota has been at the
forefront of education on the Armenian genocide for many years. It was
established as an Independent Center with its main administrative relationship
with the Department of History. CHGS is also affiliated with The Institute for
Global Studies, The Humanities Institute, Department of German, Dutch and
Scandinavian Languages, The Human Rights Program at the University of
Minnesota
School of Law, and The Center for European Studies.
Its director, Professor Stephen Feinstein, has been at the helm of the Center
since its creation in 1997 and has expanded its website to include eyewitness
survivor testimonies, documents, teaching guides, online streaming video and
audio, and other materials about the Armenian genocide. Some of the materials
were provided to the Center over the years by the Armenian Genocide Resource
Center (AGRC), including an expanded reference guide for teachers and
students,
and are available through its website.
The Armenian Genocide: 90 Years Later DVD is available from AGRC for a
special
price of $14.95 plus $4.00 shipping and handling. Send check or money
order to
AGRC, 5400 McBryde Avenue, Richmond, CA 94805.

10) Armenia Fund Reconstructs Artik Hospital

YEREVANThe British affiliate of Armenia Fund has embarked on a vital hospital
reconstruction project in the Republic of Armenia. The Artik Hospital the
Shirak Region of Armenia will undergo major renovation in order to meet the
growing needs of the region.
Presently, the project is in its design stage. The scope of the
reconstruction will include strengthening of the building and its foundation,
construction of a boiler-house, installation of a modern heating system, as
well as installation of new doors and windows. The hospital will also undergo
crucial seismic retrofitting in order to prevent collapse in case of an
earthquake. In addition to key structural upgrades, new restroom facilities
will be built and new flooring will be installed throughout the facility. Part
of the new plan will encompass a new electrical conduit system, as well as
safe
and reliable wiring throughout the building. After its completion, the
hospital
will have a new, independent sewage system. The surrounding landscape of the
hospital will be redesigned as well.
After a close assessment of the hospital, healthcare specialists
determined that the condition of the hospital is critically deteriorating.
Construction experts revealed major structural damage due to a lack of repair
and maintenance over the years.
Over the past twenty years, the hospital has been moderately renovated.
Unfortunately, the catastrophic earthquake of 1988 crippled the hospital’s
structural support and foundation structure. Currently, only one out of four
buildings is being used for patient care.
The hospital currently has 40 beds and serves as the main healthcare facility
for the town of Artik. Due to a lack of readily available healthcare
facilities, the hospital serves the Shirak region’s growing 60,000 population.
Armenia Fund plans to expand patient capacity as soon as reconstruction works
are completed.

Armenia Fund, Inc., is a non-profit 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation
established in 1994 to facilitate large-scale humanitarian and infrastructure
development assistance to Armenia and Karabagh. Armenia Fund, Inc. is the US
Western Region affiliate of “Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund.

11) Third Pan-Armenian Writers’ Conference to Be Held in Antelias

ANTELIAS (Combined Sources)–The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia, based in
Antelias, Lebanon, will host the third Pan-Armenian Writers’ Conference on
April 6-9, according to a press release by the preparatory Committee.
The conference will be the third meeting of writers from Armenia and the
diaspora. In consultation with the presidency of the Union of Writers of
Armenia, the Committee has already sent invitations to writers in Armenia,
Karabagh, and the diaspora. More than 170 writers from Armenia, Karabagh,
Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Turkey, Egypt, Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece,
Switzerland, England, Australia, Georgia, the United States and Canada have
already accepted the invitations.
All writers can participate in the conference. Interested individuals can
contact the preparatory Committee for more information by emailing
[email protected].

12) Element Band Presents Armenian CD Yev O Phe

–Band incorporates sounds of Europe and the Mediterranean, while maintaining
purity of original compositions

Titled Yev O Phe, Element Band’s first Armenian CD brings a refreshing and
long-awaited sound to Armenian music by partnering distinct vocals with
colorful, warm, and exotic arrangements.
While the sounds of Europe and the Mediterranean come to life through the use
of classical guitar, violin, bass, accordion, bouzouki, mandolin, and
keyboard,
Yev O Phe remains free to be distinctively Armenian.
The band takes great pains to keep the Armenian songs pure, but uses bold
arrangements and genuine sounds of instruments to introduce exciting twists
and
compositions of traditional songs.
Element Band first captured the attention of audiences with their performance
at the John Anson Ford Theatre in May 2005, as the opening act for the French
gypsy band Bratsch. They later opened for the legendary Demis Roussos at the
Kodak Theater in November 2005.
Element Band members include Ara Dabandjian (arrangements, keyboards,
classical guitar, accordion, string instruments), Saro Koujakian (songwriter,
vocals, guitar), Gars Sherbetdjian (vocals), Shant Mahserejian (violin), and
Jeremy Millado (bass).

Yev O Phe

During the Middle Ages, as a result of greater and more enduring contact
between Armenia and the West, the 36-letter Armenian alphabet incorporated two
additional letters, o and phe, to better reproduce the sounds of European
tongues–all the while, needless to say, remaining utterly Armenian. As a
result, the modern Armenian alphabet can almost perfectly replicate the
pronunciations of various languages.
So it is with Element’s Armenian compositions that incorporate the sounds of
Europe and the Mediterranean, while remaining untethered, simply free… to be
Armenian–uniquely.
Yev O Phe will be available on March 19 at , ,
, and at a store near you.

13) Critics’ Forum: Visual Arts

Of Man and Nature, Layers and Fragments: The Art of Vasken Brudian

By Ara Oshagan

Vasken Brudian is an architect and artist. He has held one solo exhibition,
but his work has been part of many group shows across the country over the
past
few years. After a long hiatus, Brudian has returned to the art scene with
brand new work and the publication of a monograph titled, “Paintings and
Collages: Towards a New Aesthetics.” In conjunction with this publication,
Brudian’s work will be on display in a solo exhibit at the Harvest Gallery in
Glendale, from March 24 to April 2.
Brudian’s work draws together a wide array of concepts and ideas and
employs a
plethora of media: from architectural drawings, paint, acrylic and ink, to
photography, alphanumeric texts, philosophical writings, poetry, literature,
and essays by well-known writers. And complementing his range, the sizes of
his
works also vary from the very intimate to ones over 20 feet in length. His
work
is expansive and inter-disciplinary and does not lend itself to easy
categorization. It attempts to strike a difficult and delicate balance of
form,
color, and concept.
Brudian is best known for his “architectural paintings”though these two words
are not nearly sufficient to describe what this work is. These “paintings” are
the product of a process that combines free-hand painting (the paint and
brush)
with modern technology-based methods (the computer and plotter). Paint and
pencil is used to begin a painting on a surface, typically mylar. Then, after
it is dry, architectural forms (everything from lines to beams to numbers to
sections of buildings and stairways) are drawn over it with a large-scale
plotter. Then more paint is added, then more plotting. This process is
repeated
several times, layer upon layer, until a dense and multi-storied canvas
emerges. Obliteration is used as a tool of construction here. Each layer fully
or partially obliterates the one before it. It obliterates and also fuses into
it and builds on top of itconstructing a painting in the same way one
constructs a building, perhaps. Technology is inherent to the creation of
these
worksthey cannot be conceived or made without the use of computer technology.
The end result of this process is that paint and architectural fragments are
held in tension, the fierce linearity of bits and bytes tussle with the
free-flow of the hand, instinct is interwoven with technology. Are the two
fusing or clashing? This is a question that is raised by Brudian over and over
again.
In his monograph, Brudian includes some of this earlier work but also adds a
host of new work, some of it continuing in the vein of architectural painting
and some of it departing from it completely. The new work takes its
inspiration
from various literary works, poems, and essays. These fragmentary textual
references are a strong presence, and they also serve as platform on which
Brudian develops his explorations of various themes. This series also
introduces photographic images, mainly landscapes. And although they are at
times altered, their essential photographic quality is retained. In the new
work, these large natural landscapes are fragmented and altered and then
juxtaposed with fragmentary texts or abstractions or architectural paintings.
Nature, as a concept, makes itself known.
Where the landscape photograph is brought together with poetic fragments, the
result is overtly and simply emotional. “The Caged Bird”which combines a
scenic
landscape photograph cast to red with Maya Angelou’s verse about a bird
singing
of freedomis idyllic in its presentation of nature and the bird’s romantic
musings about freedom. “Two Butterflies,” which presents a very similar
idyllic
and idealized scene of nature, adds poetry by Emily Dickinson about waltzing
butterflies. It is nearly impossible to not imagine butterflies waltzing in
those trees or to not see the flight of a bird. These works are like reveries,
simple invitations to stop and contemplate nature, to bathe in the serenity
and
emotional flow of verse and landscape.
It’s quite a leap from these pieces to the much more challenging and
compelling ones that bring together nature and man via architecture and
technology. This work is a direct continuation of Brudian’s architectural
paintings but extends their reach significantly. While the earlier work was
based on a process of layering and melding of diverse forms, Brudian’s new
work
begins with a clash, a conflict, but goes furtherthat is, it turns in on
itself. In his best work, Brudian tiptoes along the razor-sharp edge between
man and nature, conflict and harmony, instinct and technology.
These larger canvases are composed of two totally distinct and disparate
partsa color-washed photographic scene of nature on one side and a
Brudian-style architectural painting on the other. The works are juxtaposed
and
placed next to each other and forced to inhabit the same frame. The two sides
of the frame are pitted against each other, and while in one moment they are
clashing and tussling, in the next they suddenly seem to flow together in a
strange harmony.
The best example of this is “/Twisting the Separatix/,” where underneath a
serene row of upright trees (cast to blue) mad architectural forms crisscross.
At first, it seems the ground ends and underneath the soil, architecture and
art begin, i.e. manthe dividing line, the front is demarcated, the trenches
are
dug. But then, those architectural lines and forms begin to echo strange
rootscold, hard rootsthat seem to feed the trees themselves, and suddenly the
two parts of the canvas flow into each other, give and take from each other.
Nature and man are at war, yes, but also at peace and perhaps even nurturing
one another.
The work, at its best, is a constantly shifting perspective, asking and
answering and suddenly losing hold of the answer and questioning again. The
effect is thought-provoking and inquisitive: are the two sides clashing or
complementing each other? What is the relationship between the natural and the
man-made? These are the critical questions Brudian poses in his work.
Brudian’s monograph is a bold attempt at embracing a plethora of diverse and
difficult concepts, using nearly as many diverse media. In his best pieces, he
manages to strike a delicate balance between a host of extremesideas, forms,
and colors, all pulling in different directions. Brudian’s reentry into the
art
world is refreshing and welcome.

Ara Oshagan has degrees in Physics and English Literature from UCLA and a
degree in Geophysics from UC Berkeley. He used to be a scientist and now is a
photographer. But everything still comes from Literature.
You can reach him or any of the other contributors to Critics’ Forum at
[email protected]. This and all other articles published in this
series
are available online at To sign up for a weekly
electronic version of new articles, go to Critics’
Forum is a group created to discuss issues relating to Armenian art and
culture
in the diaspora.

All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2006 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.

ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.

–Boundary_(ID_jwqj3O+APTY7OLnOXyXc4Q)–

ARMENIANS IN GEORGIA’S JAVAKHETI REGION WANT ARMENIAN DECLARED OFFICIAL LANGUAGE

Rustavi-2 TV, Tbilisi
16 Mar 06

[Presenter] Ethnic Armenians in Akhalkalaki [town in Georgia’s
Samtskhe-Javakheti region] have called for Armenian to be declared a
second official language in Samtskhe-Javakheti. A special appeal to
parliament is being drawn up. A meeting of the council of Armenian
social organizations led by the heads of the council’s six members
ended in Akhalkalaki a few minutes ago.

There has been more tension in the region since the killing of [ethnic
Armenian] Gevork Gevorkyan in Tsalka last week during a clash outside
a restaurant.

[Mels Torosyan, captioned as member of the (?Akungi) movement,
in Russian] I don’t know what I can call it. People are not being
informed and it is not clear who organized it. If we are allowed to
gather and make comments on the air then it’s all right. When rumours
are being spread it is another matter. Who is behind it? You know
better than I do.

[Presenter] Our correspondent Lasha Kveseladze is in Akhalkalaki and
joins us now live. Lasha, do we know what is in the text of the appeal?

[Correspondent] Yes, we do. Armenian social organizations have been
holding a meeting on local television at which they said there had been
reports that there would be a protest rally today. The rally did not
take place and the organizers of the previous protest [on 11 March]
denied any involvement in a planning a rally. At the previous rally
Armenians were calling for Armenian to be a second official language
in predominantly Armenian areas. Today they officially decided to
write a special appeal to MPs.

[Davit Rustakyan, captioned as member of the Virk movement, in
Russian] It is about the declaration of the Armenian language as a
second official language in ethno-geographically Armenian areas. A
decision was made to appeal to the four Armenian MPs in [the Georgian]
parliament so that they could raise the issue in there. If they refuse,
we will be forced to make use of the relevant clause in the Georgian
constitution and begin gathering signatures for a petition.

[Correspondent] Members of Armenian social organizations say that it
is not their fault that they do not understand Armenian [as heard,
presumably means Georgian] and because of that they face problems. They
say Georgians from other regions of the country are being appointed
to local government posts in the region. In addition, if Armenian is
declared an official language, money will no longer have to be spent
on teaching Georgian in the region.

They also mentioned the protest rally taking place in Tsalka today
which they said had been organized by Svans [natives of Georgia’s
mountainous Svaneti region who have been resettled in the area]. They
welcomed the Svans’ protest.

[Azat Mipaktsyan, captioned as member of the Javakhk movement, in
Russian] They rang and said that representatives of Svaneti wanted to
hold a peaceful rally to ask for the forgiveness of those Armenians
who were harmed there. If that is what it really is about and they
want to admit their mistake, we welcome that. That is very good,
but if it is for another reason it is not.

[Correspondent] The only big protest today took place outside the
Akhalkalaki local administration. There the main issue there was
electricity supply problems in the region.

NKR PRESIDENT PRESENTS CURRENT STAGE OF KARABAKH SETTLEMENT TO ARTSAKH PARLIAMENTARIANS

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Mar 15 2006

STEPANAKERT, MARCH 15, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. NKR President
Arkadi Ghukasian touched upon the current stage of Nagorno Karabakh
settlement process at his March 15 meeting with representatives
of the Artsakh Democratic Party and Azat Hayrenik (Free Homeland)
party parliamentary factions. The head of the state also answered
the questions of MPs.

As Noyan Tapan was informed by NKR President’s Acting Spokesperson,
the interlocutors also touched upon the country’s socio-economic
development processes, as well as a number of issues included in NKR
NA coming sitting’s agenda.

FORMER SPOKESMAN OF RUSSIAN FSS FD IN ARMENIA STILL ON REMAND

YEREVAN, MARCH 14. ARMINFO. The former spokesman of the Frontier
Department of the Russian Federal Security Service in Armenia, Lieut.

Col. Ivan Zhirenko is still on remand.

He was caught at the Moscow Vnukovo Airport while trying to bring to
Armenia 17 kg of gold articles.

The senior office of the department’s PR group. Lieut. Col. Vardan
Karapetyan say that Zhirenko has been sent to continue his service
in Voronezh. “We are waiting for the trial,” says Karapetyan.

YEREVAN, BAKU SHOULD SET KARABAKH SETTLEMENT TIME – OFFICIAL

ITAR-TASS, Russia
March 7 2006

YEREVAN, March 7 (Itar-Tass) — The leaders of parties to the conflict
should set the Karabakh settlement time, U.S. Deputy Assistant
Secretary of State Matthew Bryza for European and Eurasian Affairs
said in Yerevan on Tuesday.

He said the United States was ready to do its best for the soonest
Karabakh settlement.

He disagreed with the opinion that the recent meeting between the
Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents in the Paris suburb of Rambouillet
was a failure. The sides were close to an intermediate agreement in
Rambouillet, and their inability to do that does not mean that the
process is in a deadlock, the diplomat said. He said that final steps
are always very difficult and require determination of the leaders.

Normalization between Armenia and Turkey will become a necessary
and natural consequence of the Karabakh settlement agreement, the
official said. He said that normalization of the Armenian-Turkish
relations was discussed at every meeting of American administration
members in Yerevan and Ankara.

Bryza said that his Tuesday meeting with Armenian President Robert
Kocharyan was very constructive.

RUSSIA 10 TIMES BEHIND AZERBAIJAN IN GROWTH

Kommersant, Russia
March 7 2006

Of CIS member states, Azerbaijan posted the highest rates of industrial
growth in January 2006, the CIS Inter-State Statistics Committee said
in the report promulgated Monday, March 6, 2006.

In Azerbaijan, the industrial output climbed 40.2 percent on year
in January 2006, the CIS Statistics Committee reported. Belarus
had 12.6-percent growth, Tadjikistan posted 10.3 percent. Russia’s
industry manifested just the 4.4-percent advance in the first month
of the year and Kazakhstan showed acceleration of 0.5-percent.

Kyrgyzstan posted the 8.3-percent decline vs. January 2005. The
indicator lost 2.9 percent on year in Ukraine, 1.3 percent in Armenia
and 1.0 percent in Moldova. No information was provided about the
industry’s performance in Georgia, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

KARABAKH: PEACE DEAL DOUBTS
By Ashot Beglarian in Stepanakert

Institute for War and Peace Reporting, UK
March 9 2006

The Karabakh Armenians voice their concerns over elements of a peace
agreement.

Following the recent unsuccessful peace talks on the Nagorny Karabakh
dispute in Paris, the Karabakh Armenians are demanding a greater say
in the peace process that will decide their future.

Having kept quiet on the eve of the talks, the leadership of the
territory is insisting that the Karabakh Armenians must now be allowed
to negotiate directly with the government in Baku.

“When Azerbaijan negotiates with Armenia and rejects dialogue with
Nagorny Karabakh it is clear that they have one goal – to portray
Armenia as an aggressor,” Arkady Gukasian, president of Karabakh
told journalists. “I regard that as propaganda. As soon as Azerbaijan
begins negotiations with Nagorny Karabakh it will become obvious that
Baku is moving away from propaganda.”

Gukasian said that he supported the peace negotiations chaired by the
American, French and Russia mediators of the Organisation for Security
and Cooperation in Europe but they should not be a substitute for
“direct talks between the parties of the conflict” – which he says
are Nagorny Karabakh and Azerbaijan.

The Karabakh Armenians are currently excluded from the peace talks.

Baku refuses to talk directly to them, saying that Armenia has
annexed the territory of Azerbaijan and it will only negotiate with
the government in Yerevan. The Karabakh Armenians says they are in
a direct confrontation with Azerbaijan.

Nagorny Karabakh proclaimed itself an independent state in 1991,
but is not recognised by the international community and is linked
to the outside world via Armenia.

On this issue, there is a unified position in Karabakh. Parliamentary
deputy and former general Vitaly Balasanian said, “It is illogical
to keep silent when your own fate is being decided.” Gegam
Bagdasarian, a member of the opposition parliamentary faction ARF
Dashnaktsutiun-Movement-88, said, “We ought not to have allowed the
problem to move onto the Armenia-Azerbaijan plane.”

High hopes were placed on the peace talks in Rambouillet outside
Paris last month but they ended without result and with mutual
recriminations. The mediators met again in Washington this week and
US officials are expected to visit Azerbaijan next week to explore
new ideas.

Since the talks failed, top officials in Azerbaijan, including the
minister of defence, have said that if the peace process fails Baku
reserves the right to go back to war to re-conquer Karabakh.

The Karabakh military leadership said that they were ready to respond
to this.

“Naturally we are concerned by the militaristic declarations coming
from Baku,” said defence minister Seiran Ohanian. “However in terms
of our equipment and modernisation our army is no worse than the
Azerbaijani one and as head of the military I declare that we are
ready to fight for every inch of our land. In case of necessity,
our army is ready to organise defence, to counter-attack and make
preventative strikes.”

At Rambouillet the Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents, Robert
Kocharian and Ilham Aliev, discussed a peace plan which reportedly
involves the phased withdrawal of Armenian forces from seven
territories around Nagorny Karabakh, the introduction of peacekeepers
and a referendum to be held at a future date on the status of Karabakh.

The issue of status, which has been at the heart of the dispute since
it began in 1988, again appears to be the biggest stumbling block.

Karabakh’s foreign minister Giorgy Petrosian told IWPR, “Any status
lower than independence is unacceptable for us. The participation
of the Karabakh side in negotiations is important and necessary,
as there is a series of questions which cannot be decided without
Nagorny Karabakh.”

Despite their closeness to Armenia, the Karabakh Armenians are also
setting out a distinct position on a series of key issues under
discussion in the negotiations.

Rudolf Hairapetian, chairman of the parliamentary commission on state
legal issues, told IWPR that holding a referendum was “a waste of
time and money” because Karabakh had held one in 1991 and voted to
secede from Azerbaijan.

“In the 14 years which have passed since we proclaimed independence, no
processes have occurred which suggest that public opinion has changed
by a single iota. Any person on our streets can confirm that,” he said.

The Karabakhis also have worries about the prospect of withdrawal of
forces from the regions of Kelbajar and Lachin that lie immediately
between Nagorny Karabakh and Armenia.

“All our rivers that feed the population of Nagorny Karabakh begin in
Kelbajar,” said political analyst David Babayan. “If it is returned to
the control of Baku it will be easy to carry out an act of biochemical
sabotage to poison the rivers. It is absolutely impossible to return
the Lachin region, as it is our means of contact with the outside
world.”

They also want to raise the issue of the Shaumian region which they
regard as being part of Nagorny Karabakh but all of whose Armenian
population was driven out by the Azerbaijani offensive of 1992.

Following the meeting in Rambouillet, several round tables were held
in Nagorny Karabakh to discuss the implications of the meeting.

Human rights activist Karen Ohanjanian argued for greater
democratisation, saying, “The international community is ready within
the framework of international law to recognise self-proclaimed
republics if they meet sufficient requirements.”

“We need to bring public opinion to the attention of the negotiators
and always remember the price that Nagorny Karabakh paid for victory in
the war,” said Galina Arustamian, chairwoman of the Union of Relatives
of Dead Warriors.

IWPR asked 20 Karabakh residents for their views on the peace
process. All were firmly of the view that Nagorny Karabakh should be
given a direct role in the negotiations.

“Diplomats ought to find the correct way to solve the problem by
means of organising high-level meetings in Baku and Stepanakert and
also between figures from the worlds of art and culture, historians,
writers, workers, representatives of all levels of society in
Azerbaijan and Nagorny Karabakh,” said Arto Saakian, whose son died
in the war of 1991-94.

“It won’t be possible to achieve any positive result at top-level
Armenia-Azerbaijan meetings until Azerbaijan sits down at the
negotiating table with Nagorny Karabakh.”

Most respondents agreed that Azerbaijani refugees ought to be allowed
to return when a political settlement was reached. However, several of
those questioned in the town of Shushi (which formerly had a majority
Azerbaijani population and is known by Azerbaijanis as Shusha) were
categorically against this.

“The return of Azerbaijanis conceals the threat of a resumption of
war in a few decades, as sooner or later they will begin to present
their claims to the land and ‘stab us in the back’,” said Sanasar,
an elderly resident.

On the key issue of the status of Karabakh itself, most of those
questioned said they favoured the return of territories from their
control to that of Azerbaijan only in exchange for a guarantee of
the independence of Nagorny Karabakh.

Ashot Beglarian is a freelance journalist in Stepanakert, Nagorny
Karabakh. The terminology used in the edited version of this article
differs from that used by the author.