ANKARA: Intelligence Head Misleads Dink Examination

INTELLIGENCE HEAD MISLEADS DINK EXAMINATION

Turkish Daily News
July 25 2008
Turkey

ISTANBUL – TDN with wire dispatches

Ramazan Akyurek, head of the Istanbul Police Department’s intelligence
unit, stands accused of misleading officials investigating
the department on charges of negligence following the murder of
prominent Turkish Armenian journalist, Hrant Dink, a newspaper
reported yesterday.

Allegedly, Inspector Å~^ukru Yıldız, during his examination of
the Istanbul Police Department, asked whether police had responded
following notification from the Trabzon Police Department on Feb. 17,
2006 that Yasin Hayal, now one of the murder suspects, had planned to
kill Dink, daily Milliyet reported. In that notification, the Istanbul
Police Department was also told of Hayal’s plans to come to Istanbul
and stay at his brother’s home.

The intelligence unit of the Istanbul Police Department replied, in
March, that it had taken no action regarding this notification. In his
report, Yıldız further stated that the Istanbul Police Department
only carried out its first examination of computer records of Hayal’s
brother, Osman Hayal, three days after Dink was murdered, concluding
that the police had neglected their duty.

However, another investigation was initiated after police officials
objected to Yıldız’s report. Inspector Akif İkbal then found that
the first computer record by Istanbul police, about the notification
from the Trabzon police, was made Feb. 20, 2006. İkbal, in his report,
stated that the answer provided by the intelligence unit of the
Istanbul Police Department had misled Yıldız. Akyurek was reported
to have placed his signature under the answer sent to Yıldız.

Akyurek was the police chief in the Black Sea province of Trabzon
between 2004 and 2006, during which time major crimes occurred in the
city including the murder of Catholic priest, Andreas Santoro, by a
teenager and the bombing of a McDonalds restaurant by Hayal. It is
further reported that Akyurek had used Erhan Tuncel, another suspect
in Dink’s murder, to supply his department with information.

–Boundary_(ID_2A0v+Gt+zsZAB14HMOSui A)–

Ombudsman Leaves For Javakhk

OMBUDSMAN LEAVING FOR JAVAKHK

A1+
24 July, 2008

Today RA Defender of Human Rights Armen Harutyunian had a phone
conversation with Public Defender of Georgia Sozar Subari. During
the conversation Armen Harutyunoan expressed anxiety over the recent
explosions in Javakhk and the murder of the two Armenian policemen
and its consequences.

Public Defender of Georgia Sozar Subari informed that he is to leave
for Javakhk on July 26 to acquaint himself with the situation. At
Harutyunian’s request Mr. Subari promised to inform Armenia about
the results of his visit, the undertaken activities and their effects.

Lake Bluff Set To Meet With Judge About Armenian Church In Mansion

LAKE BLUFF SET TO MEET WITH JUDGE ABOUT ARMENIAN CHURCH IN MANSION
LINDA BLASER

Lake Forester
July 24 2008
IL

The village of Lake Bluff will meet with a judge for the Illinois
Department of Revenue on July 31 to appeal the state’s decision to
grant a property tax exemption to George Michael, who converted his
lakefront mansion into the Armenian Church of Lake Bluff.

"This initial conference is just to set some scheduling and ground
rules for the proceeding," said Village Attorney Peter Friedman, who
will represent the village. "In between this initial conference and
the ultimate hearing, the village will have the ability to further
investigate the facts underlying the claimed exemption."

>>From the village’s perspective, Michael is operating a church in
an area zoned "country estate residence" without village permission.

At the core, the situation is a zoning issue, according to Village
Manager Drew Irvin.

"There is a process that can authorize a church to operate" in that
area, said Irvin. Michael "has not applied for a special use permit. He
has not received a special use permit."

"This has nothing to do with whether Lake Bluff does or does not
want this church. It’s really a zoning issue for us," said Lake Bluff
Village President Christine Letchinger.

The village fined Michael $115,000 on June 24 for violating zoning
regulations.

"That’s $250 a day for each day of the violation," said Irvin. Michael
operated the church for 460 days.

It is not unusual for a church in Lake Bluff receive a property tax
exemption, Friedman said.

‘Out of the ordinary’ "It is very unusual for a residence that has
been used as a residence for many years to attempt to convert itself
into a church and receive a property tax exemption. That is certainly
out of the ordinary," Friedman said.

The loss of property tax revenue will have the greatest affect on the
local education system, specifically Lake Bluff Elementary School
District 65 and Lake Forest High School District 115. Together,
the schools receive approximately 60 percent of the nearly $80,000
in annual property taxes on the property in the 1900 block of Shore
Acres Drive.

"That’s the price of a teacher," said District 115 Superintendent
Harry Griffith. "Losing a teacher every year for the next five to 10
years is pretty significant."

"We don’t like to lose any revenue because any loss takes away from
our students and that’s unfortunate," said David Vick, superintendent
of District 65.

"Fundamentally, the property tax system is built on trying to create
as much fairness among property tax owners as possible to fund public
education," Griffith said. This situation "raises questions about
fairness among all property taxpayers."

For now, Michael has "suspended the use of the premises for church
services when we first got the notice from the village that they
objected to the use," his attorney Mark Belongia said Tuesday. He
described the suspension as "an agreed accommodation to try and
resolve the dispute."

The $115,000 fine was due July 8, but remains unpaid, Irvin said.

The village received word on June 16 that the Illinois Department of
Revenue issued the non-homestead property tax exemption certificate
on June 12, Irvin said.

Belongia is confident he and Michael will prevail in the hearing.

"The state has already made its decision, a proper decision,"
he said. "There’s no reason why there should be any change in the
state’s granting of an exemption."

Nor Serount To Hold A Festival Devoted To Armenian Independence Day

NOR SEROUNT TO HOLD A FESTIVAL DEVOTED TO ARMENIAN INDEPENDENCE DAY

NOYAN TAPAN

JU LY 23

Nor Serount Cultural Assocation is going to organize a celebration
devoted to the Independence Day of the Republic of Armenia on September
21, 2008 at the Verdugo Park in Glendale. This is already Nor Serount’s
10th festival devoted to the Independence Day of Armenia.

The entertainment will be provided by a line-up of well – known
performers and dance groups. Armenian businesses, artists and craftsmen
will display their works and services. Traditional Armenian food
will be served and different carnival games will be organized for
the youngsters.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=115935

100th Anniversary Of Viktor Hambartsumyan

100TH ANNIVERSARY OF VIKTOR HAMBARTSUMYAN

Panorama.am
19:39 22/07/2008

This year is rich with jubilees of famous people: Alexander
Shirvanzade’s 150 anniversary, William Saroyan’s 100 anniversary,
Vazgen Patriarch the First’s 100 anniversary, Rafael Israelyan’s 100
anniversary and Viktor Hambartsumyan’s 100 anniversary.

Note that 92,568.8 thousands drams have been disposed from the
reserved budget of the Government to implement the jubilee ceremonies
of Hambartsumyan. 7 mln of the disposed sum has been provided to the
Ministry of Culture and 85 mln – to the National Academy of Sciences.

According to the Hayk Harutyunyan the director of Byurakan observatory,
the jubilee ceremonies will start from September. He said that
scientific conferences, international school for young specialists
will be organized.

34 Years After the Turkish Invasion

34 YEARS AFTER THE TURKISH INVASION
Alexander-Michael Hadjilyra – [email protected]

Gibrahayer – July 08

Writing this article has been particularly taxing for me, not just
because of the sizzling summer temperatures and the various articles I
must finish writing soon, but mainly because it will once again remind
me of the ongoing drama that Cyprus has been enduring for 34 years now,
ever since the barbarous Turkish mehmetçik unlawfully invaded the sweet
land of Cyprus, marking its history forever.

A small historical account is in order: on 16 August 1960 Cyprus had
finally become an Independent Republic; although this was celebrated
throughout the island, there was some unrest amongst the residents of
Cyprus: the Greek-Cypriots viewed Independence as an interim to Enosis,
the Turkish-Cypriots considered it a relief from the possibility of a
union with Greece, while the Armenians, the Latins and the Maronites
were worried as to how the Greek-Cypriots would treat them in this
newly-founded state, whose Constitution was labelled as `given’. This
fragile partnership that gave the 18% Turkish-Cypriot minority
super-rights, with 30% government participation and 40% Army and Police
participation, along with a Vice-President with the right to veto, 3
out of the 10 Ministers and 15 out of the 50 Members of the Parliament,
was not meant to last long.

After an escalating sequence of events, inter-communal violence bro
ke
out in the early hours of 21 December 1963. By midday, the
Vice-President, the 3 T/C ministers, the 15 T/C MPs and all T/C
government employees and policemen had left their posts, and soon after
they took over the northern parts of Nicosia centre ` amongst them
Karaman Zade and Neapolis, thus evicting 231 Armenian families from
their ancient quarter, and depriving them of their mediaeval Church of
Sourp Asdvadzadzin and the Melikian-Ouzounian Primary School. Within
Nicosia, a green line was established on 30 December 1963, separating
the G/C from the T/C, thus laying the foundations for further
partition.

The years went by, with many breathtaking events that led Cyprus more
than once on the brink of a war with Turkey. However, with the
exception of the Aghirda pocket (stretching from Nicosia till the
outskirts of Kyrenia), life went on peacefully, although not without
tension. The scheming and manoeuvring of the Greek military junta
(which, at the time, controlled the National Guard), the United States
and the United Kingdom, led to the unlawful coup d’ état against the
elected president, Archbishop Makarios III, at 08:20, on Monday, 15
July 1974. At the time the tanks were attacking the Presidential
Palace, president Makarios was touring a group of schoolchildren from
Egypt. Soon after Makarios escaped towards Kykko Monastery, the
perpetrators announced that he was dead, and they installed a scapegoat =0
D
as their puppet `president’, Nicos Sampson.

The cowardly coup was the beginning of the end: however
non-meritocratic and person-centred Makarios’ administration might have
been, his controversial presence was a bulwark against all Turkish
usurpations, a stronghold against any military intervention on Cyprus.
With Makarios out of the picture, Turkey had found the ideal pretext to
invade our beloved Cyprus: the `protection’ of the Turkish-Cypriots.

At around 5:30 a.m. of 20 July 1974, numerous Turkish troops landed at
Five Mile point off Kyrenia, and parachutists are thrown in Aghirda
pocket. Turkish aircrafts bombed Pentadaktylos range and Paphos forest,
and within two days they had reached Kyrenia; although a cease-fire was
agreed on the 22nd July, the Turkish troops continued their onward
march until the 8th August, occupying about 3,95% of the total area of
Cyprus, home to around 40.000 people. Thanks to the military resistance
of the National Guard and ELDYK (the Greek contingent in Cyprus, at the
time based to the west of the Race Course), the Attila troops were
unable to capture significant parts of Nicosia centre and its
outskirts, while the heroic resistance of the UNFICYP troops, aided by
the National Guard, managed to prevent the Turks from capturing Nicosia
International Airport.

A few days later, on Wednesday, 14 August, Turkey once again invaded
Cyprus, with full throttle. Nicosia, Famagusta
and numerous villages
were being bombed and tens of thousands of refugees fled to Larnaca and
Troödos. By the time the cease-fire was signed at 18:00, on 16 August
1974, around 33,45% of Cyprus had been occupied. Even after the
cease-fire, the Turks continued to occupy small parts of Cyprus until
the end of September 1974, reaching till the northern boundaries of
Dhekelia SBA, and seizing the Louroujina salient (thus controlling the
Nicosia-Larnaca motorway), the Petra-Angolemi-Galini area, the prolific
copper mines of Mavrovouni and Apliki Lefka, as well retaining the
strategic Kokkina pocket, which is not adjacent to the occupied areas.

The outcome of the Turkish invasion was devastating: 142.000 G/C and
2.500 Maronite refugees, 20.000 enclaved in the north (of which only
485 remain today), 3.500 killed, and about 1.600 missing. About 34,85%
of the total area of Cyprus (3.224 Km²), i.e. 188 villages, 39
settlements and 10 Municipalities had been occupied, along with parts
of Nicosia and Ayios Dhometios. Over the years, Turkey keeps a steady
presence of 43.000 Turkish soldiers and 120.000 settlers from Anatolia,
while the cultural damage done simply defies any quantification;
suffice to say that out of the 677 occupied churches and monasteries, a
fair number has been desecrated and/or turned into mosques, barracks or
barns. Moreover, the pseudo-state – installed by Turkey, and recognised
only by Turkey and Pakistan – has ill
egally and unfoundedly altered the
names of almost all occupied towns and villages and of about 21.150
microtopyms.

Today, 34 years from that dreadful summer, Cyprus is a much different
place: after the opening of a small number of crossing points between
the two sides, occupied Cyprus is no longer fully inaccessible, save
for numerous military retained areas scattered all over it. We can now
peacefully visit our occupied lands, see our beloved houses occupied by
T/C or Turkish settlers, and we can watch our beautiful villages decay
in the passage of time, since their illegal residents are not bothered
to attend to them. On certain occasions we can even hold masses in some
churches (only if you are Greek Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Maronite or
Anglican; Armenian Orthodox do not enjoy this `privilege’).Apart from
that, we serve the National Guard for 25 months and, as reservists, a
few times a year until the age of 50, while UNFICYP maintains its
presence for over 44 years now; the buffer zone, an area of 242 Km²
stretching across the island between the two sides, is UNFICYP’s realm.
Yet, the most disturbing of all, although somehow inescapable and
inevitable, is that our political leaders participate in talks about
the solution of the Cyprus problem on the basis of a bi-zonal,
bi-communal federation, the meaning of which was only made known to the
general public just a few years ago,
on the event of the infamous Annan
Plan. Incidentally (?), the referendum was held on 24 April 2004.

While most of our politicians seem to have reached to a consensus that
a federation is supposedly «the only possible outcome of the talks,
based on the UN Security Council resolutions», none of them has had the
decency to inform us about its history as a solution to the Cyprus
conundrum. A bi-zonal, bi-communal federation is in essence Turkey’s
second option to taksim (division). It was originally agreed upon in
1977, between Makarios and Denktash, at a time that a substantial
number of Greek-Cypriots and Maronites continued to reside in the
occupied part of Cyprus, under serious threats for their lives; what is
more, we know that Makarios was vehemently against any form of
geographical federation and, considering his character, it was most
probably another manifestation of his cunningness, since he knew it was
inapplicable at the time.However, Makarios died soon afterwards, and in
the meantime most of the G/C and Maronite enclaved sought shelter to
the government-controlled areas, while at the same time the Muslim
population rapidly increased, with the influx of Turkish settlers from
Anatolia. Considering the birth rates of the free and of the occupied
areas of Cyprus, and the non-stopping arrival of the illegal and
uncivilised settlers, the day that the Muslim population will outnumber
the Christians may not=2
0be very long from now.

But it is not just the nature of the possible solution that bothers me;
other matters cause me and many other Cypriots a great deal of distress
and distrust towards the Turkish side. To begin with, the memories are
still fresh from the brutal murdering of Tassos Isaac and the coward
killing of Solomos Solomou, in August 1996 by Turkish-Cypriots and
Turkish settlers, when they tried to enter the Turkish-occupied areas
of Famagusta, while the clandestine cold-blooded assassination of
Theophilos Georgiades, outside his Nicosia house in July 1994, still
haunts many Cypriots up to this day.

Another sign of Ankara’s implacability is the Varosha issue: Varosha
was not included in `operation Attila’; the only reason it was taken by
the Turks is because its inhabitants, fearing for their lives,
abandoned it. The Turks also occupied Ayios Memnon and Kato Dherynia,
and they would have taken Dherynia too had there not been for a few
armed G/C soldiers that thought it prudent to fire a few shots to make
their presence known to the invaders.

The Varosha area has been fenced for 34 years now, with its buildings
having fallen into disuse and severe decay due to lack of maintenance
and the exposure to the elements. For 34 years now the Turks have been
toying with us that if we do this and that they may consider giving
Varosha back, but for 34 years now not a
single square foot has been
given back to us. On the contrary, in 2000 they advanced to Strovilia
area. What could possibly make us think they would ever be willing to
give something back?

And finally, what is even more disturbing is that when one decides to
walk over to the other side, all their wishful thinking is
disillusioned for good: for starters, not only must we show our
passport/I.D., but we are also subject to the ridiculous procedure of
having to write down our information onto a photocopied piece of paper,
which is stamped as a `visa’ for entering the so-called `Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus’. This process is entirely unnecessary, and
it is carried out purely to show us that there is a `state’ in the
occupied part of Cyprus, which we must respect. The lack of necessity
for this time-consuming procedure (whose direct result is the formation
of queues in front of the pseudo-police cubicles) is revealed when one
loses their paper `visa’: since they are already registered in the
pseudo-police computer system, no harm done.

After we enter the occupied areas, we experience the vast antithesis
between the free Cyprus and the occupied Cyprus: the majority of the
Turkish settlers and T/C live in derelict houses, often devoid of
furniture we consider to be essential, and the whole ambiance transfers
you back in time. Not just that, if we venture to go
just 200 m. away
from the main streets, we find ourselves in a land of an almost
deafening silence and isolation. Not to mention the eerie and backward
settlers with their weird manners, their many wives and their veils,
and the fact that they speak only Turkish. How are we supposed to live
together with these people, with whom we have nothing in common?

Nevertheless, we must continue to fight for the rights of the people of
Cyprus, and hope for a better future, in a united Cyprus (sic).

Newly Built Highway Breaking

NEWLY-BUILT HIGHWAY BREAKING

A1+
17 July, 2008

The Armenian State Budget allocated AMD 768 million to the
construction of Voskepar-Baghanis Highway, which is part of
Armenia-Georgia intergovernmental Highway and passes round the
Azerbaijani border. However, "Energotsantsshin" JSC built a faulty
road and did not even organize an opening ceremony for some implicit
reasons. Though the road is open today, drivers prefer the old, but
much more comfortable road since the newly-built Voskepar-Baghanis
Highway is breaking and road-builders have to repair it.

ANKARA: Turkish FM Quoted On PKK, Normalization With Armenia

TURKISH FM QUOTED ON PKK AND TIES WITH IRAQ, NORMALIZATION WITH ARMENIA

Anatolia News Agency
July 16 2008
Turkey

["WE HOPE ISSUE OF PKK TO BE OUT OF AGENDA IN RELATIONS WITH IRAQ,
BABACAN" – AA headline]

ANKARA (A.A) -Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan said Wednesday the
Turkish government hopes the issue of terrorist organization PKK to
be out of the agenda in relations with Iraq.

Speaking at a programme on state run TRT TV channel, Babacan said
that it is the wish of the Turkish government to normalize relations
with Armenia.

"Armenia is the only neighbour of Turkey with which Turkey has
problems with. Turkey has taken many unilateral steps in regard to
Armenia in the recent past. There are direct flights between several
Turkish provinces and Armenian capital of Yerevan. There is indirect
trade with Armenia. We, as Ankara, have sent messages to Armenia for
dialogue. Armenian allegations in regard to the incidents of 1915 cause
problems in relations and actually poison Turkish-Armenian relations,"
Babacan said.

Touching on Turkish-Iraqi relations, Babacan said that "Turkey wishes
for the issue of terrorist organization PKK to drop out of the agenda
in relations with Iraq. This can be possible with the political will
of the central government in Baghdad and the regional administration
in north of Iraq."

In reference to Iran, Babacan stressed that "Turkey is against the use
of nuclear weapons in the region. However, we have respect for any
sovereign country to utilize nuclear technology. The international
community must be in dialogue with Iran to overcome its suspicions
on Iran’s nuclear programme."

On Cyprus, Babacan said that a new atmosphere of optimism has come
into existence following elections in the Greek Cypriot administration.

"The two leaders in Cyprus will hold talks on July 25th and evaluate
the works of the technical committees. We are the side that favours
a solution. The solution should be found within the framework of the
United Nations," Babacan also said.

Book Review: The Ruined City Of Smyrna: Giles Milton’s ‘Paradise Los

THE RUINED CITY OF SMYRNA: GILES MILTON’S ‘PARADISE LOST’
Adam Kirsch

The New York Sun
July 16, 2008 Wednesday

It is a measure of the sheer darkness of history in the last
century that one of its darkest episodes – the 1922 destruction of
the Ottoman city of Smyrna, in present-day Turkey – is practically
forgotten. Forgotten by American readers, that is, even though American
missionaries and sailors played a heroic role in the catastrophe. But
to the Greeks and Armenians who were driven from the city, and to
the Turks who conquered it with fire and sword, the name of Smyrna
still raises fierce passions. Google it and you will find dozens
of Web sites disputing what really happened there, from both the
Greek and the Turkish points of view. As with the Armenian genocide,
the arguments over Smyrna are so rancorous, more than 85 years after
the event, that it is clear the city is one of those places where,
in Faulkner’s words, the past isn’t dead – it isn’t even past.

In "Paradise Lost" (Basic Books, 426 pages, $27.95), the British
journalist Giles Milton tells the story of Smyrna’s fall in vivid and
sometimes lurid terms. The title telegraphs his fairly sentimental
approach to the subject; indeed, Mr. Milton views Smyrna through the
same kind of romantically blurry lens that Margaret Mitchell brought
to the antebellum South. His primary focus is on the "Levantines,"
the families of European descent who dominated the city’s commercial
life, using their terrific wealth to create a bubble of graceful
living in a sea of poverty, violence, and ethnic tension. Though the
rich, well-connected Levantines suffered much less in 1922 than the
vast majority of Smyrniots, Mr. Milton dwells on their dispossession
and exile as though it were the heart of the story. In part this
is because he is following his sources – he makes good use of the
unpublished memoirs of Levantine exiles – and in part it is because
the contrast between their gilded lives and their sudden ruin is
dramatically irresistible.

For the Whitalls, Girauds, Woods, and other Levantine clans,
Smyrna – in particular, the rich suburb of Bournabat – was indeed a
paradise. They traced their descent from English, French, and Italian
merchant families, and were legally citizens of home countries
many of them never saw. But by the time of World War I, they had
created a virtually self-sufficient aristocratic world. Members of
the leading Levantine dynasties did business together, raced yachts
together, admired one another’s mansions and gardens, and above all,
intermarried. "We called everyone aunt or uncle to be on the safe
side," one of the Whitalls remembered.

Mr. Milton writes about their lifestyle in the frankly ogling tone of a
Near Eastern Robin Leach. The Paterson family’s mansion, for instance,

had thirty-eight rooms … and was famous throughout Smyrna for its
opulent interior. Two spectacular crystal chandeliers hung in the
great atrium and the imported iron stair balustrade was one of the
marvels of the colony. There were four grand pianos in the ballroom
and each bedroom had a marble washbasin and running water.

The travel writer Gertrude Bell, visiting the stately homes of the
Whitall cousins, recorded how "the big gardens touch on one another and
they walk in and out of one another’s houses all day long, gossiping
and laughing. I should think life presents itself nowhere under such
easy and pleasant conditions."

In Mr. Milton’s account, the Levantines and their fortunes were a
source of nothing but good to the city at large. He writes that
"they more than any other community had helped to shape Smyrna
in their own image – rich, cosmopolitan and of mixed blood and
heritage. Their factories and mines employed all, regardless of race
or nationality. And they had a concern for their workforce that was
patrician in sentiment and philanthropic in outlook." He cites the
example of Edward Whitall, a fanatical horticulturalist, who, when
World War I forced the closure of his factories, continued to pay
employees "to scour the mountainside for new rarities of bulbs."

Yet it is not hard to see why the privileges of the Levantines might
have rankled the other Smyrniots. The foundation of their fortunes,
as Mr. Milton notes, was the so-called Capitulations – the right to
trade without paying duties to the Ottoman government, which made
their exports of figs, licorice, and other commodities immensely
profitable. As their name makes clear, however, these capitulations
were signs of Turkish weakness, extorted from a feeble Ottoman state
by its European rivals. The very fact that an exclusive foreign
colony monopolized the trade and resources of the Turkish Empire was
a standing reminder that Turkey had fallen far behind the West in
the race to modernize. Mr. Milton does not tell us what the ordinary
Greek or Turk, who could have gained admittance to Bournabat only as
a servant, really thought of these interlopers, but it is not hard
to guess.

In any case, the Levantines, large as they loom in "Paradise Lost," had
only a peripheral role to play in the fate of Smyrna. During World War
I, Mr. Milton shows, they were in a precarious legal position. Because
they were subjects of Britain or France, countries at war with
Turkey and her German allies, the Levantines could technically be
considered enemy nationals. But thanks to the protection of Rahmi
Bey, the cosmopolitan governor of Smyrna, they were shielded from
the punitive edicts issued by the Young Turk regime in Constantinople.

Rahmi Bey, in fact, emerges as one of the few heroes of "Paradise
Lost." According to George Horton, the American consul in Smyrna
and one of Mr. Milton’s prime sources, Rahmi was "one of those more
intelligent Turks who thinks that war with France and England is
a piece of folly in which Turkey is sure to lose." Running Smyrna
practically as an independent fiefdom, he actually tried to surrender
the city to the British in the middle of the war. When British
warships bombarded the fortifications in the harbor, Horton recalled,
Rahmi would sit at a waterfront cafe enjoying the sight with a glass
of ouzo. His reward from the British, after the Ottoman surrender in
1918, was to be imprisoned on Malta, like all other members of the
wartime government, until the intervention of the Levantine magnates
helped to win his release.

Such high-handed blundering was sadly typical of the way the British
government dealt with the whole Middle East after 1918. Even as they
were sowing the seeds of confusion in Palestine and the Arab countries,
the British committed themselves to a disastrous policy of support for
the expansionist Greek government of Eleftherios Venizelos. Venizelos
was the father of the "Megali Idea," the Great Idea of a revived Greek
Empire. He hoped to take control of vast swathes of the former Ottoman
Empire, where the Greek Christian population was still substantial.

Above all, he coveted Smyrna, the only majority Christian city in
Turkey, where Greeks outnumbered Turks by two to one. The British
prime minister, David Lloyd George, had fallen under Venizelos’s
spell and firmly believed that Greece would be the future hegemon in
the eastern Mediterranean. As a result, he threw Britain’s support
behind the Greek claim to Smyrna, and on May 15, 1919, Greek troops
disembarked in the city’s harbor to take possession of their prize.

It was a scene of rejoicing and revenge, dramatically evoked by
Mr. Milton. The local Greeks, who had long nurtured a grievance against
the Ottoman state and had been severely persecuted during the war,
welcomed the Greek army as liberators. In the ensuing tumult, a riot
erupted that claimed the lives of some 400 Turks and 100 Greeks. But
this was just a small foretaste of the violence to come. For the
occupation of Smyrna catalyzed the Turkish nationalist movement of
Mustafa Kemal, who vowed to liberate the city. Over the next three
years, in a war sketched in very brief outline by Mr. Milton, Greeks
and Turks fought over the future of eastern Anatolia. Atrocities
were committed by both sides, and the level of hatred was such that
no compromise peace could be reached. Whoever lost the war, it was
clear, was going to suffer atrociously.

In the end, it was the Greeks who lost, and Smyrna that paid the
price. The heart of "Paradise Lost" comes in its final third, as
Mr. Milton gives a day-by-day chronicle of the fall of the city to
the victorious Turkish armies. The trouble began on September 6, 1922,
as the retreating Greek army entered the city, heading for the ships
that would take them home to mainland Greece. With them went the local
Greek administration, leaving Smyrna ungoverned and defenseless. As
the city began to fill up with hundreds of thousands of Greek and
Armenian refugees, fleeing the inevitable Turkish reprisals, it was
clear that a humanitarian disaster was in the making. Henry Morgenthau,
the former American ambassador to Turkey, warned that "unless Britain
asserts herself by showing that she … has an interest in protecting
these Christians, the Turks will be as merciless as they were with
the Armenians."

But as Mr. Milton damningly shows, the British, the Americans, and
the other Western powers refused to act, fearful of getting mixed
up in the Greek-Turkish war. As a result, when the Turkish armies
arrived on Saturday, September 9 – both regular troops and the brutal,
much-feared irregulars, or chettes – there was no one to stand between
them and the defenseless population of Smyrna.

The result was a horrifying massacre – all the more horrifying because
it was entirely predictable and, indeed, often predicted. Drawing on
the memoirs of survivors, most of whom were just children at the time,
Mr. Milton conjures the nightmarish scene. Turkish troops killed Greek
and Armenian civilians with absolute impunity. Girls were repeatedly
raped before having their breasts cut off.

But the real disaster came when the Turkish forces – deliberately,
according to numerous eyewitnesses – set the city ablaze, after
dousing the Armenian quarter with gasoline. Desperate to escape the
fire, hundreds of thousands people crowded the narrow waterfront,
where they were penned in by Turkish soldiers and kept without food
or water. Thousands dropped dead of hunger and disease, or committed
suicide by leaping into the sea, where the corpses soon formed a thick
mass. All the while, American and British battleships rode at anchor
in the harbor, but refused to intervene.

Even as he delineates this hell, Mr. Milton pays homage to
the righteous men and women who risked their lives to help save
others’. Several American citizens – mostly ministers and missionaries
– tried to use their diplomatic status to shield refugees. The
American International College took in 1,500 Greeks and Armenians,
while thousands more camped out at the American consulate. But
it was finally a single individual who did the most to stop the
catastrophe. Asa Jennings, a Methodist pastor from New York who
worked for the Smyrna YMCA, used a combination of moral suasion and
sheer trickery to convince the Greek government to send a fleet to
Smyrna under American protection. On September 23, two weeks after
the massacre began, the rescue ships arrived, and within a week,
some 300,000 people had been evacuated to Greece.

The death toll in the fall of Smyrna remains disputed, Mr. Milton
writes, but "approximately 100,000 people were killed and another
160,000 deported into the interior," most of whom perished on the
way. In the face of a tragedy of such dimensions, it is hard to
feel too sorry for the Levantine aristocrats. As Mr. Milton writes,
"they had not been raped or killed – that had been the fate of their
servants." Most of them managed to escape Smyrna with their lives,
though they lost their possessions.

Above all, what they lost was the city itself – the luxurious,
cosmopolitan society that could not survive an age of uncompromising
nationalism. After a century of ethnic cleansing, Smyrna deserves
to be remembered as, if not a paradise lost, at least a martyr to
the human capacity for hatred. As George Horton wrote on leaving the
burning city, "one of the keenest impressions which I brought with me
from Smyrna was a feeling of shame that I belonged to the human race."

Book Review: Paradise Lost: Smyrna, 1922; The Destruction Of Islam’S

PARADISE LOST: SMYRNA, 1922; THE DESTRUCTION OF ISLAM’S CITY OF TOLERANCE
Veronica Arellano

Library Journal Reviews
July 15, 2008

Milton, Giles. Paradise Lost: Smyrna, 1922; The
Destruction of Islam’s City of Tolerance. Basic Bks: Perseus
. Jul. 2008. c.464p. photogs. maps. index. ISBN 978-0-465-01119-3
. $27.95. HIST

At the beginning of the 20th century, Smyrna was the most vibrant,
cosmopolitan city in the Ottoman Empire. Home to an overwhelming
population of Greeks, Armenians, and wealthy Levantine business
owners, this Turkish city was a multicultural model of peaceful
cohabitation. Yet the advent of World War I and increasing sectarian
tension transformed this Ottoman "paradise" into a war zone long after
the war officially ended. A complete breakdown of law and order and
an indifferent foreign military presence ultimately led to the city’s
brutal destruction and one of the worst humanitarian crises the world
had ever seen. London journalist Milton (Nathaniel’s Nutmeg ) raises
expectations for this chronicle of the destruction of Smyrna, and,
thankfully, he does not disappoint. Drawing heavily from the personal
narratives of Smyrna’s Christian residents and foreign diplomats, as
well as interviews with survivors, Milton offers a detailed portrayal
of life in Smyrna, a comprehensive look at the politics that shaped
the city, and a shockingly vivid eyewitness account of the city’s
violent demise. This extremely well-researched historical narrative is
recommended for both public and academic libraries.-Veronica Arellano,
Univ. of Houston Libs.