Many Immigrants Chose Maine A Century Ago

MANY IMMIGRANTS CHOSE MAINE A CENTURY AGO
By Wayne Reilly

Bangor Daily News, MAINE
Oct 23 2006

In September 1906, a young girl named Mantoria George disappeared
near her home at 192 Hancock St. in Bangor. Her father, Maron George,
a dry goods and peddlers supply dealer, spent a week checking reports
his daughter had been seen in South Brewer and Old Town. A neighbor
girl claimed to have seen the 13-year-old on the railroad tracks by
the lumber docks with two men, one of whom had offered her a dress
if she would go away with him.

The George family was part of the nation’s rapidly growing population
of immigrants. Seventeen percent of Bangor’s population was
foreign-born, according to the 1910 census, while another 23 percent
had at least one foreign-born parent. Nearly half were English-speaking
Canadians. But if you walked through downtown Bangor, you were apt
to see a colorful array of Russians, Italians, Turks, Armenians,
Scandinavians, French-Canadians, Germans and other groups speaking
an exotic mix of tongues. Six Chinese laundries were listed in the
city directory.

In an era when theories of ethnic superiority were popular, there
were desirable and undesirable immigrants. The newspapers were not
shy about expressing the prevailing stereotypes. Not surprisingly,
the good immigrants were the ones who acted most like native Mainers.

Maron George, a member of Bangor’s "Syrian colony," was one of the
respected immigrants. He had "lived in Bangor for 14 years and is
a good citizen. When he came from his native country, he had very
little, but by dint of saving the small sums which he earned he
gradually became more comfortably off and was able eventually to
buy his store. He is known and trusted in Bangor, and is one of the
influential men in the Syrian colony in this city," wrote a Bangor
Daily Commercial reporter on Sept. 24, nearly a week after Mantoria’s
disappearance.

The Bangor Daily News didn’t hesitate about identifying some of
the undesirable immigrants in an intemperate editorial titled "The
Persistent Peddler." Peddlers were a plague across the landscape,
bothering farmers, selling "mainly cheap and trashy" items. "The
sum total of service which they perform for mankind is very slight,"
sniffed the editorial writer on Aug. 24, 1905.

"Nine out of ten are not Americans. One half of them have no more than
a smattering of the English language. The men have no intention of
becoming citizens," complained the writer. Mostly, he was referring to
"Arabians" and Armenians. These two groups were "grasping" and often
dishonest. On the other hand, Jewish peddlers, of which there were
also many, were "honorable" and kept their word, no matter how poor;
they were "square" and "responsible for their acts," although some were
"oversharp in driving bargains." Many had already become citizens.

This tirade provoked a response from an "Arabian" businessman who
had begun his career in America as a peddler and was now "a popular
and successful merchant in a busy Down East town." He wrote, "As a
matter of fact the average peddler of Armenian or Arabian descent
possesses as high ideals of right and wrong as does the average man
or woman of any other race."

Nearly a year later, on July 13, 1906, the Bangor Daily Commercial
endorsed Scandinavian immigrants. Hundreds of Swedes had settled
farms in several communities in Aroostook County several decades
before, and many Swedes, Norwegians, Finns and Danes had settled in
other parts of the state since then. "No class of immigrants in this
country rank higher in intelligence, industry, thrift, public spirit
and in all the elements of good citizenship than those who come from
the Scandinavian peninsula," according to the editorial.

It was the Italians, however, who provoked the greatest muddle of
responses. Worshiped for their willingness to do hard, dirty work,
ridiculed for their habits and appearance and condemned for their
tendency to strike or riot if working and living conditions were not
to their liking, their presence was a godsend to many communities. It
was the Italian work forces recruited in New York and Boston that
built many of the state’s railroads, paper mills, water systems and
other major projects during this period.

A story in the Commercial on Aug. 6, 1906, however, warned that
Italians were growing scarce. The Irish labor pool had dried up long
ago. So had the Danes and Norwegians. "Neither love nor money will
hire the Yankees to do the work," the writer lamented. One Augusta
contractor "believes that ultimately we will have to rely upon the
Chinese and import large numbers for this work."

And what became of Mantoria George, the Syrian girl mentioned at
the top of this column? She was found in South Brewer a week after
her disappearance. She said she had run off with a girl named McCrea
who had $5 that they shared. They had stayed with some Italian men
one night and then alone in some fields under the open sky and in a
small shed, buying food with the money.

Mr. and Mrs. George wanted nothing more to do with Mantoria. They
signed papers turning her over to the state industrial school for
girls in Hallowell. Mantoria had run off before and lived with some
Italians all night and she had been known to steal, said her father.

"Mr. George says that under his religion when a girl leaves home
under such circumstances, she may not be taken back again, but must
be sent … to some orphanage to remain until she attains a certain
age," reported the Commercial on Sept. 25. Whatever Maron George’s
religion might have been, he was acting like an American. Wild boys
and girls could be institutionalized for running away in America. No
one seemed to question Mantoria’s fate.

ANKARA: Head of Turkish Consumers’ Federation: Boycott L’Oreal this

Head of Turkish Consumers’ Federation: Boycott L’Oreal this week

Hurriyet, Turkey
Oct 19 2006

The head of the Turkish Consumers’ Federation, Bulent Deniz, has
announced that the French cosmetics brand "L’Oreal" is to be the
focus of this coming week’s boycott against French brands in general
by his group.

Following the French Parliament’s decision to approve a bill calling
for jail time and monetary fines for people publicly denying the
so-called Armenian genocide, the Turkish Consumer’s Federation
announced the start up of a boycott campaign which would target a
different French brand every week. This past week has seen a boycott
of all "Total" products, with a reported 30% drop in sales due to
the boycott.

Items produced under the L’Oreal label include Biotherm, Cacherel,
Garnier, Giorgio Armani, Inneov, Kerastase, Lancome, Matrix,
Maybelline, Ralph Lauren, and Vichy products.

According to a statement from Deniz, L’Oreal has been selling in Turkey
since 1989, and has increased its sales volume across the country 45%
in the past 5 years.

ANKARA: Canada supports proposal for joint history commission – Turk

Canada supports proposal for joint history commission – Turkish official

Anatolia news agency, Ankara,
20 Oct 06

Ankara, 20 October: "Foreign Minister Peter MacKay of Canada supports
our proposal to establish a joint history commission and encourages
Armenia to join the commission," said Namik Tan, spokesman for Turkish
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on Friday [20 October].

"MacKay attended a reception held at the Turkish embassy in Ottawa on
18 October to mark the establishment of Turkey-Canada Parliamentary
Friendship Group. During the reception, MacKay extended support to
our proposal to establish a joint history commission and encouraged
Armenia to join the commission," he said.

"MacKay also said that they attached great importance to Turkey’s
regional role and Turkey-Canada bilateral relations. He highlighted
importance of Turkey-Canada cooperation in Afghanistan and thanked
Turkey for its assistance in evacuation of Canadian people from
Lebanon," he said.

Tan recalled that Turkish Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister
Abdullah Gul met MacKay on 22 September, during the United Nations
General Assembly meetings.

"During the meeting, Gul expressed Turkey’s regret over adoption of a
bill about so-called Armenian genocide by the Canadian Parliament in
2004. Gul informed MacKay on Turkey’s views about baseless allegations
of Armenians.

"Following the meeting, MacKay sent a letter to Gul in which he
extended Canadian government’s support to Turkey’s proposal to
establish a joint history commission to deal with the issue,"
Tan added.

Armenians Do Not Hurry To Quit Smoking

ARMENIANS DO NOT HURRY TO QUIT SMOKING

Armenpress
Oct 18 2006

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 18, ARMENPRESS: David Petrosian, the chief manager
of a special center established last year in Yerevan to help people
wishing to quit smoking, said to Armenpress his country fellows were
not in a hurry to try do quit smoking.

Smokers wishing to give up this pernicious habit have to pay $50 to
doctors of this special anti-smoking center who offer medications
and psychological consultations to help quit smoking.

Petrosian said overall 17 people have asked for the center’s help in
12 months, but 2 people began smoking again, but he argued this did
not mean that Armenians were reluctant to quit smoking.

"We have to step up drastically the anti-smoking campaign to see
progress,’ he said The treatment of each patient here depends on
the extent of their tobacco dependence. David Petrosian cited some
figures saying that this sort of centers have helped to reduce the
number of smokers in the USA and some European countries from 70 to
25 percent. The center has a dietitian to consult people fearing they
may put on weight after quitting smoking.

The World Health Organization estimates that 63.7 percent of Armenian
men are smokers – the highest rate in Europe. By comparison, an
estimated 60 percent of men in neighboring Georgia are smokers and
31.2 percent in Azerbaijan.

Expert: Armenia’s Position On Javakh Is Formed In The West

EXPERT: ARMENIA’S POSITION ON JAVAKH IS FORMED IN THE WEST

Regnum, Russia
Oct 17 2006

An extended dialog is being carried out now between Armenia
and Georgia, where Yerevan takes an inferior position. However,
the determining role in the dialog is played not by the bilateral
relations, but by the West’s position and goals in the Javakh area
(Armenian-populated region in Georgia – REGNUM). Armenian political
analyst Igor Muradyan expressed such opinion talking to reporters in
Yerevan on October 17.

In general, Muradyan motivates the assumption by the fact that Armenia
has nothing to take from Georgia, and Yerevan does not interfere
into the Javakh process only because there is such directive by the
West. The expert finds it difficult to say what the price of Armenia’s
neutrality on this issue is. He believes that West’s interest in
Javakh should not be underestimated. A narrow group of top-level
experts is being occupied with the problem in the West; key figures
are EU High Commissioner for Foreign Affairs and Security Javier
Solana in Europe, and US Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and
Eurasia Daniel Fried in the USA, Igor Muradyan believes. "The matter
is, that Western expert community derives from the fact that Georgia
cannot secure its safety on its own. In this connection, the West is
going to settle the task on its own," Igor Muradyan says.

Grounding on this logic, he considers the process at the US parliament
aimed at easing the process of deploying US military forces in the
territories of other countries. Importance of the problem, the analyst
believes, is stressed in connection with the fact that the US-Turkey
relations and relations between the USA and the Black Sea countries
depend on the future of Javakh. In this connection, the expert says,
the West is trying to rule out internalization of the Javakh issue
and prevent the situation from exacerbating, so, Armenia is being
engaged in this very process.

"There is no conspiracy between Armenian and Georgian leadership
concerning the Javakh problem. It is just Armenia having serious
obligations to the West in this aspect," Muradyan says. As an example
of cooperation of Armenia, Georgia and the West he cited recent arrest
of one of United Javakh leaders, Vahagn Chahalyan. "They should release
this guy, persuade United Javakh members to go into parliament,
initiate a political process and work at settling problems of the
region." As for Russia’s stance on the issue, Muradyan believes it
is inactive, for which there are objective reasons.

Armen Jegarkhanyan: I Am The Most Ordinary Clown

ARMEN JIGARKHANYAN: I AM THE MOST ORDINARY CLOWN

Panorama.am
15:57 16/10/06

Moscow Drama Theater headed by renowned Russian-Armenian actor Armen
Jigharkhanyan will celebrate its 10th anniversary in Yerevan. The
theater will stage the performance "A liar is needed" tomorrow evening
upon the invitation of the Armenian president.

In the words of Jigarkhanyan, 45 years ago he played exactly in the
same play in Russian Drama Theater after Stanislavski.

Jigarkhanyan has not been playing for several years giving way to
young actors. The attempts of the Armenian reporters to know if he
will come back to stage did not give results.

Laureat of state awards of the Armenian SSR, people’s artist of the
Soviet Union Armen Jigarkhanyan has played in more than 200 fiction
films and has been included in the book of world records. The
70 years old artist says about himself, "I am the most ordinary
clown."

Transperancy International: Anti Corruption Fight In Armenia Is Just

TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL: ANTI-CORRUPTION FIGHT IN ARMENIA IS JUST AN IMITATION

Panorama.am
15:37 17/10/06

The fight against corruption in Armenia has just an imitation,
Transparency International Armenia said in relation to anti-corruption
policy of the government of Armenia. The office officials said USAID
and Counterpart International took party in anticorruption policy
report which Transparency International Armenia prepares. "Three
years ago there were only talks about corruption and the power
authorities launched an anticorruption policy. However, studies
of different international organizations show that nothing has been
changed since that time and the level of corruption remains the same,"
Amalia Kostanyan, head of Transparency International Armenia said. She
think there is no political will to punish the transgressors and also
believes the society will not support, either.

ANKARA: French President Calls Turkish Premier, Regrets Bill On Arme

FRENCH PRESIDENT CALLS TURKISH PREMIER, REGRETS BILL ON ARMENIAN CLAIMS

Anatolia news agency, Ankara,
15 Oct 06

Ankara, 15 October: French President Jacques Chirac on Saturday
[14 October] evening telephoned Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan and said he was sorry over adoption of a bill in the French
National Assembly that would make it a crime to deny so-called
Armenian genocide.

It was reported that Chirac told Erdogan that this was a development
pertaining to the upcoming general elections in France and noted that
he would do his best to prevent the bill to become a law.

Turkish PM Erdogan in is part explained Chirac the indignation in the
Turkish government and public, and noted: "We should never sacrifice
our bilateral relations to politics."

Chirac said: "I am very sorry over the initiative of the French
National Assembly. I understand your feelings and furthermore I
share them."

Chirac said any change in positive relations between Turkey and France
was out of question.

Erdogan recalled that he had launched necessary initiatives to prevent
this development.

Erdogan indicated that Turkish public reacted against the remarks
of Chirac on so-called Armenian genocide during his visit to
Armenia. He said statements of Chirac, particularly establishing
relationship between Turkey’s EU membership and baseless allegations
were criticized.

"It is impossible for us to accept this stance of you," Erdogan said.

Chirac said the development in the French parliament would not affect
Turkey’s negotiations with the EU.

Erdogan underscored that the bill contradicted freedom of speech
principle in the French constitution, and noted that it was not
possible to explain this to Turkish people with logical reasons.

Erdogan also said: "This is a problem between Turkey and Armenia. We
felt upset that the researches that have to be carried out by
historians were made a matter of politics."

Erdogan asked French President Chirac to prevent the bill to become
a law.

Chirac reaffirmed that he would continue to support Turkey’s EU
process, and noted that he would do his best to prevent Turkish-French
relations to be damaged in the sensitive political atmosphere.

An Extraordinary Life

AN EXTRAORDINARY LIFE

A1+
[01:24 pm] 14 October, 2006

A Chechen journalist recalls the part Anna Politkovskaya played in
his life – and that of many others.

Just over two years ago, the newspaper of which I was both editor and
publisher ran into trouble. We couldn’t go on, as every print house
in the North Caucasus had refused to print "Chechenskoye Obshchestvo"
– someone high up had pressured the police into stopping us publishing.

It was during a presidential election campaign in Chechnya, and
clearly someone feared that independent reporting might interfere
with the Kremlin’s man getting in.

I travelled the length and breadth of the North Caucasus but couldn’t
find a printer willing to deal with us. But one day the phone rang
– it was Anna Politkovskaya, who’d heard about the problems we were
having. Up until that point, I was barely acquainted with this renowned
reporter for the Moscow-based paper Novaya Gazeta.

"Timur, I’ve heard you’ve got a problem," she told me, getting to the
point immediately. "I’ve spoken to my editor and we’re prepared to
offer you a page in Novaya Gazeta so you can at least tell readers
what’s going to be in your next edition."

I responded by thinking aloud, "We need to think how to do it."

But Politkovskaya – never one for shades of grey – cut me off, saying,
"What’s there to think about? What good is that to me?" And the next
issue of Novaya Gazeta duly came out with a whole page devoted to
an account of the problems we were having, and excerpts from some of
our reports.

That wasn’t the last time I was helped by Anna Politkovskaya. When
I won the Andrei Sakharov prize for Russian journalism, one of the
jury members told me I got it because she fought my corner.

Politkovskaya herself won a huge number of human rights and
journalistic awards both at home and abroad. She often travelled
to other countries to speak as an expert on Chechen and Caucasian
affairs – and used every such occasion to talk about the problems
facing Chechnya, not as a free trip to Europe, as her detractors
sometimes said.

"It’s very, very important. Opportunities to be heard by important
people in Europe come up only rarely, so one can’t miss them – one
needs to get the most out of them," she said.

For people in Chechnya, Politkovskaya was tantamount to a
miracle-worker.

Zareta Hamzatkhanova, a researcher with the Memorial human rights
group’s office in Grozny, worked with Politkovskaya on the case of
Mehti Mukhayev, a man wrongly convicted of a crime. She said her
colleague was fuelled by her nerves.

"She wrote about the torture this man had suffered and told his story
in full, with no thought for the possible repercussions it might have
for her," said Hamzatkhanova.

People in Chechnya had faith in her. "Just about every person that came
to the Memorial office with a problem asked to meet Politkovskaya. They
all thought that if Politkovskaya wrote about their case it would
really help," said Hamzatkhanova. That was actually true – many of
the major human rights issues in Chechnya became widely known about
because she wrote about them.

"There was always a queue to see her," recalled Novaya Gazeta’s chief
editor Dmitry Muradov. "I’d tell her, you can’t save all the Chechens,
you’re not their Joan of Arc. But she insisted that she could."

Fatima Tlisova, editor of the Regnum news agency’s North Caucasus
service, worked with Politkovskaya on several occasions and recalls
how she had "her own particular style – all exclamation marks and
full volume".

"Of course, you can write in plain narrative style about the things
she was describing, but she was trying to shout her message across,"
said Tlisova.

Tlisova believes the murder of Politkovskaya was designed to intimidate
Russian journalists in the most public way possible, and she fears
the tactic may work. "They’re saying that her murder will awaken
the public’s social conscience, but I am worried that the opposite
will happen – her passing will make journalists censor themselves,"
she said.

In the case of my newspaper, Politkovskaya’s attitude had recently
begun to change. She felt we were becoming too uncritical of
developments in Chechnya and of leading political figure Ramzan
Kadyrov.

On one occasion she wrote to me complaining, "What a pity your
newspaper has begun to change, definitely for the worse. It’s a shame
‘Chechenskoye Obshchestvo’ has joined the ranks of those with fallen
reputations."

In fact, there had been changes in Chechnya and in Russia itself –
you were no longer allowed to write the things you could have done
five years ago.

But it was as if Politkovskaya was oblivious to this – she carried
on writing as she’d done five, even ten years earlier. And that was
what they killed her for.

Her death has become a symbol of those changes.

Tatyana Lokshina, the head of the Moscow-based human rights centre
Demos has often visited Chechnya, and sums up Politkovskaya’s
contribution as follows, "Among the few Russian journalists who
dared to write the truth about the second [1999-2005] Chechen war,
Anna Politkovskaya undoubtedly stands in first place.

"It’s almost impossible to believe she’s no longer with us. She wrote
about this dangerous subject for so long, she travelled in the region
and took such immense risks that many of us came to believe she’d
gone beyond the danger point and nothing could happen to her."

Lokshina recalls how Politkovskaya received threats in 2001 after
publishing material alleging human rights abuses at "filtration
camps" in Chechnya, and had to leave the country for a while. "But
she returned and continued doing the same work," said Lokshina.

The June 2004 publication of an interview with Ramzan Kadyrov, who
later became Chechnya’s prime minister, was another landmark event for
Politkovskaya. Again, her friends and colleagues thought it was time
for her to call a halt. But as Lokshina said, "She didn’t stop. And
it all seemed to pass over."

"Anna’s reporting was uncompromising, with nothing left out, and it
gave her almost iconic status among readers in Chechnya, Russia and
abroad," said Lokshina. "The possibility that she could be killed off
in casual fashion seemed unthinkable – it would have been a monstrous,
crazy, inhuman crime and would have created a scandal the Russian
authorities just couldn’t afford.

"But we were wrong to think that. Anna’s been murdered."

So what happens now? According to Lokshina, western journalists and
politicians are suggesting that there is almost no one left to tell
the truth about Chechnya and the rest of the North Caucasus – "the
torture, the abductions, and other monstrous crimes against civilians".

But she insists they are wrong.

"To fall silent now would be to play into the hands of Anna’s killers,
to bury her a second time, and to allow her life to be dismissed,"
said Lokshina. "That cannot be allowed to happen. One can’t allow
oneself to be afraid."

By Timur Aliev in Grozny (IWPR, CRS No. 361)

Timur Aliev is IWPR coordinator in Chechnya.

ANKARA: French Parl. moves to make denial of ‘genocide’ a crime

The New Anatolian, Turkey
Oct 13 2006

French Parliament moves ahead with making denial of ‘genocide’ a
crime

The New Anatolian / Paris

French parliamentarians on Thursday approved a bill making it a crime
to question the Armenian genocide claims, following a heated debate,
but a silent vote, on the bill.

Deputies in the French Parliament voted 106-19 for the bill, which
aims at introducing prison terms up to one year and fines up to
45,000 euros to those who question the controversial events of 1915.
There was a low turn-out of deputies from the ruling UMP, which is
known for its opposition to the approval of the bill.

The bill, which was introduced by the opposition Socialist Party
(PS), must still be passed by the Senate and be signed by President
Jacques Chirac to become law. However, analysts say that the ruling
UMP government won’t immediately bring the bill to the Senate floor.
Analysts also added that although bringing the bill to the Senate
could be postponed by the ruling party, there is no period of
prescription for the bill which will drop it from the agenda.

The Armenian bill was approved without including amendment requests
from UMP Deputy Patrik Deveciyan who suggested that studies by
scholars and historians on the Armenian genocide claims shouldn’t
become subject to the law.

Colonna expresses govt’s opposition

Speaking to Parliament ahead of the key vote on behalf of the
government, European Affairs Minister Catherine Colonna, who wad once
the spokeswoman of President Jacques Chirac, expressed the French
government’s opposition to the bill.

The French government expressed its opposition to the bill in May and
has not changed its position since then, she said. "There are three
reasons for this. First of all, in 2001 France recognized the
Armenian ‘genocide’ in 1915. This was pointed out by the French
president in Yerevan several weeks ago. We do not think a new one is
necessary," Colonna said.

Citing the opposition of Turkish intellectuals to the bill, Colonna
said that the present law risks creating adverse effects. "We have a
strong friendship and alliance with Turkey, a tie that dates back
centuries. Although we would like our Turkish friends to come to
terms with their past, this demand should go parallel to friendship.
Turkey has taken very courageous steps and its work should be allowed
to continue. Let us be clear, many intellectuals in the country, who
have themselves faced charges on the issue of the genocide, have
called for this law not to be adopted. Are we better placed than they
are to judge? This law risks destroying the fragile steps."

And, as the last point, she stressed that history should be written
by historians, not by politicians, saying, "I repeat what has been
said on this floor: History cannot be written through laws."

Besides Colonna, only two other deputies from the ruling UMP, Pierre
Lequiller and Michel Piron, opposed the bill during their speeches.

Deveciyan: Turkey has no lesson to teach us about repression of
opinions

The UMP’s Deveciyan, during his speech, both criticized the Turkish
government and the European European Enlargement commissioner, saying
that Turkey has no lesson to teach them
about repression of opinions.

Claiming that there is no freedom of _expression in Turkey, Deveciyan
stated that those who use the term "genocide" in Turkey are
imprisoned under Article 301 of the new Turkish Penal Code (TCK).

He and other supporters of the bill taking the floor from the ruling
and opposition parties used a protest by Turks in Lyon against the
inauguration of an Armenian "genocide" monument as a justification
for the need to approve the bill.

"Turkey has begun to export its policy of denial," said Deveciyan,
claiming that the protests in Lyon were organized by the Turkish
government. Deveciyan went on to claim that together with the
decision of the Parliament, they don’t want to write history but they
are continuing to fulfill the needs of the law enacted in 2001,
through which the French Parliament recognized the Armenian genocide
claims.

Armenia accuses Turkey of massacring Armenians during World War I,
when Armenia was under the Ottoman Empire. Turkey says Armenians were
killed together with Turks in civil unrest during the collapse of the
empire and in war conditions.

A similar bill was shelved in the spring amid pressure from Ankara.
It was represented by the opposition Socialists.

Turkey supporters abruptly left the Parliament building after the
vote without speaking to reporters. Outside, a few dozen protesters
of Armenian descent celebrated.

Chirac, during a visit to Armenia last month, said the bill "is more
of a polemic than of legal reality" but he also urged Turkey to
recognize "the genocide of Armenians" in order to join the European
Union. "Each country grows by acknowledging its dramas and errors of
the past," Chirac said.