We Stand For Every President Elected In A Free, Fair And Transparent

WE STAND FOR EVERY PRESIDENT ELECTED IN A FREE, FAIR AND TRANSPARENT ELECTION

KarabakhOpen
31-10-2007 11:13:52

Member of Parliament Gegham Baghdasaryan thinks in this complicated
situation it would be certainly right not to interfere, which does
not mean, however, that the Karabakh society can be indifferent toward
the political developments in Armenia, he says.

Gegham Baghdasaryan means the official stance of the Karabakh state. As
to discussion in general, he thinks it would be desirable if the
public opinion in Karabakh stemmed from the perception that the
public and national interest of Karabakh is to not have the Karabakh
issue become a card in political struggle in Armenia. The member of
parliament says it is dangerous when they relate the fate of Karabakh
to the Karabakhi or non-Karabakhi origin of the Armenian government
because it may aggravate the existing lack of understanding between
the two parts of the Armenian people.

"I am sure we stand for every president elected in a free, fair
and transparent election. Frankly speaking, I cannot understand the
pronouncement of the acting president of Armenia "we will work out
a tactics determined by further steps". Independent from steps that
have been taken or are to be taken, the government has one mission
in elections – to guarantee a civilized election and freedom of
expression of the will of people."

GUAM Frozen Conflicts To Be Discussed In Kyev November 14

GUAM FROZEN CONFLICTS TO BE DISCUSSED IN KYEV NOVEMBER 14

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.10.2007 14:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Frozen conflicts on the GUAM territory will be
discussed in Kyev November 14, Ukrainian Ambassador to Azerbaijan,
Stepan Volkovetsky said.

"Ukraine initiated a conference on frozen conflicts on the GUAM
territory at the level of Foreign Ministers," he said.

"There are conflicts in all GUAM member states, except for Ukraine,"
he added.

The agenda is being exacted, according to him, Trend reports.

First Monitoring, Now Post-Penitentiary Rehabilitation

FIRST MONITORING, NOW POST-PENITENTIARY REHABILITATION

KarabakhOpen
30-10-2007 12:38:35

The Civic Action Center held a round-table meeting on rehabilitation of
former prisoners, their problems during the sentence and post-prison
adaptation. The representative of the CAC, psychologist Zoya Mayilyan
made a report on penitential psychology, and told about the scientific
approach to this issue and her personal experience of work with
inmates in Karabakh.

During the discussion after the report the participants said when
at large these people must be helped not to feel as outcasts, the
government must provide them with employment, housing, etc. For only
this approach used in many countries is helpful to prevent the same
person from returning to prison.

The director of the CAC Albert Voskanyan says the psychologist of the
organization cannot visit penitentiaries any more. The NKR Police does
not authorize the CAC to hold the monthly monitoring of penitentiaries.

"Certainly, it does not mean that we will stop working in this strand.

Now we have launched a project of rehabilitation of former
inmates. We think it is as important to change the attitude of former
inmates toward the modern society and social difficulties through
post-penitentiary adaptation, as well as the attitude of the society
toward former inmates," Albert Voskanyan says.

Resurrecting An Old War At Expense Of Current War

RESURRECTING AN OLD WAR AT EXPENSE OF CURRENT WAR
Susan Hanley

BlueRidgeNow.com, NC
Oct 29 2007

Raise your hand if you understand why it is important for the
U.S. Congress to pass a resolution condemning the slaughter and
displacement of a million and a half Armenians by Turkey almost a
century ago, and to do it now.

Right now. Assuming that the average American understands the entire
history of the fall of the Ottoman Empire, isn’t it always noble to
condemn the atrocities of war and conquest? If nothing else, shouldn’t
we stand up for justice and fight ideologies that lead to the pain,
suffering and death of millions of innocent people? The answer,
of course, is yes. For the most part. But whenever international
relationships are involved, it’s always wise to dig a little deeper
and try to figure out, Why this? Why now? And most important of
all, who’s behind all of this? It’s not as if we haven’t had time
to think this whole matter over. The genocide of the Armenians by
Turkey occurred in the last years of the Ottoman Empire, from 1915
to 1919. If these actions meet the Geneva Convention’s definition
of genocide — acts "committed with intent to destroy, in whole
or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group" —
why haven’t we taken this important action much sooner? Certainly,
if ever there were a moment to underline our hatred of anything that
even smelled like genocide, it was in the dark hours that followed
World War II, when a shocked world uncovered the mass graves of
millions of Jews, gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses, political dissenters,
homosexuals and the mentally ill — the concentration camp casualties
of Hitler’s tortured vision of an ethnically pure world. Then there
was Cambodia. And Somalia. And Rwanda. And Bosnia. Not to mention
the world’s current killing field, Darfur. So why the Armenians,
and why now? A historian I am not. Neither am I a scholar. But I am
an average American with average intelligence. This is one moment
in a long, twisted campaign season when I am painfully aware of the
familiar scent of politics. Everyone knows that grand gestures are
part and parcel of the science of politics. Presidential campaigns
are wallpapered with promises impossible to keep, ideals too lofty
to attain and scathing denunciations of the sins of the past (and,
of course, of their opponent). So who in Washington is spearheading
the campaign to call Turkey to task for the mistreatment of Armenians
92 years ago? Who might benefit from this divisive scuffle at this
point in the campaign season? It’s a fair question. One of the first
things a reporter is taught is to always question the source. Why
is this person telling me this? What do they hope to gain from
it? Right now, we are in the midst of a very unpopular war in
Iraq. The chain of events that led us to engage the Iraqis has been
clouded over by arguments over weapons of mass destruction, which
nations are funding the terrorists and who is supplying money and
technological information to Muslim terrorists. It’s hard for even
the best informed among us to keep the issues straight. But one issue
is ringingly clear. The American people want out of Iraq. Those who
see the point of staying in a sectarian war that has changed shape
and location throughout the entire Middle East for centuries are few
and far between. Capitalizing on the unrest and dissatisfaction of
the American people are a long line of presidential hopefuls in both
parties as well as their partisan backers. With their Speaker, Nancy
Pelosi, acting as their front woman, the Democratic Party has chosen
now to come forward with a resolution to condemn the actions of the
now defunct Ottoman Empire in the Turkey of almost a century ago.

This is not an accident of timing or intention. It is a calculated
gesture carefully planned to elicit a response. Next question: What
response are they (whoever is behind the resolution) hoping for? The
answer to that question is another question. What does anyone have
to gain by alienating Turkey, our most powerful Muslim ally and most
important base of operations in the Middle East? It is, after all,
Turkey which has provided America with a safe base of operations
right next door to the war. "We need the Incirlik Air Force Base in
southeastern Turkey, and passage through the Habur Gate on the Iraq
border to supply our forces in Afghanistan and Iraq," said Mortimer
Zuckerman in the current issue of U.S.News & World Report (page 60).

The Democratic Party is pushing hard for a speedy withdrawal from
Iraq. If this is the will of the American people, and polls show that
for many Americans it is, then the Democrats are right to push for
the safe withdrawal of American troops. The critical word in this
entire strategy is safe. Not only is it unethical and underhanded to
resurrect a crime committed by the defunct government of a country that
is now one of our strongest allies in the war zone, it is dangerous
and stupid. We cannot and must not allow politicians to scrap for
votes at the expense of our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

However we choose to exit this war, we must do it safely. We need an
ally and a safe base of operations for so many, many reasons. Without
Turkey, we are sitting ducks. The Democrats have preened themselves
as the party of concern and responsibility for our troops in Iraq.

Putting those troops in this kind of jeopardy just to gain votes
is reprehensible. With North Korea, China and Russia such powerful
and unpredictable forces on the world stage right now, we need every
legitimate ally we can get. It almost makes you wonder if the person
behind this isn’t really a Republican. The ramifications are so deadly
if this resolution passes, that it would be enough to sway a lot of
serious voters to reconsider voting for Democrats who are capable of
being so reckless and short sighted. Whoever is playing this game in
Washington at the expense of our troops needs to stop. Now.

Susan Hanley Lane, a Times-News community
columnist, lives in Naples. Her Web site is
.com/article/20071029/NEWS/710290306/1015/OPINION0 2/NEWS/Resurrecting_an_old_war_at_expense_of_curre nt_war

www.susanhanleylane.com.http://www.blueridgenow

Hrachya Javakhian Wins In Initial Stage Of World Boxing Rating Champ

HRACHYA JAVAKHIAN WINS IN INITIAL STAGE OF WORLD BOXING RATING CHAMPIONSHIP

Noyan Tapan
Oct 26, 2007

CHICAGO, OCTOBER 26, NOYAN TAPAN. Hrachya Javakhian (60kg) amd Derenik
Gijlarian (51kg) from the Armenian representative team competed on
October 25 in the World Boxing Rating Championship held in Chicago
(USA). Hrachya Javakhian gained a victory in the first single combat
and Derenik Gijlarian was defeated and did not qualify.

OSCE Should Control Election As Free Observer, MP Says

OSCE SHOULD CONTROL ELECTION AS FREE OBSERVER, MP SAYS

ARKA News Agency
Oct 26 2007
Armenia

YEREVAN, October 26. /ARKA/. The OSCE should control the
forthcoming presidential election as a free observer, said ARF
(Armenian Revolutionary Federation) Dashnaktsutiun Member, MP
Hrair Karapetian. "Observers from one country should not prevail
over others," he said. Karapetian pointed out that OSCE observers
should make judgments basing on concrete facts, and not on "what
they heard." For this, they should participate more actively in the
organizational activities in polling stations. "It is unreasonable
to ban the participation of foreign democratic missions in the
election," said Karapetian. Russia- EU (European Union) proposed
today during the summit in Lisbon to restrain the authority of the
OSCE during the presidential election in Armenia. Russia, Armenia,
Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan approved
of the document, according to which the OSCE observers should observe
elections in all its member-countries. If the document is adopted
by the OSCE member-countries, 400-600 observers will be sent to the
CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) for extended monitoring and
about 50 observers for general monitoring. According to the document,
OSCE observers should avoid commenting on the election before the
official publication of the results. The CIS also proposes to transmit
conclusions of observers to the OSCE standing council for making a
final decision on the election. At the same time, any country mat put a
veto on the decision, which restrains the authority of observers. The
document will probably be on the agenda of the sitting of Foreign
Ministers of the OSCE member-countries.

Rice Lobbies Lawmakers Against Armenian Genocide Resolution

RICE LOBBIES LAWMAKERS AGAINST ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION
Dennis Zawacki II

JURIST
Univ. of Pittsburgh, School of Law
rice-lobbies-lawmakers-against-armenian.php
Oct 25 2007

[JURIST] US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told members of
the House Foreign Affairs Committee in testimony on US Middle East
policy Wednesday that House members should discontinue an effort to
pass a resolution condemning the World War-I era mass killings of
Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide [HR 106 materials]. The
committee approved the resolution [JURIST report] earlier this month
and it is waiting to be brought to House floor, but support for the
measure among House members seems to be waning [JURIST report]. Rice
urged Congress not to pass the resolution, bearing in mind shared US
strategic interests with Turkey, a key ally of the United States in
the war in Iraq. She said passage would "severely harm" US-Turkish
relations. President Bush has similarly urged lawmakers not to endorse
the measure.

Turkey has long objected [JURIST comment] to any attempts to classify
the Armenian killings as genocide. Several other countries – including
France, Canada and Argentina – have nonetheless passed laws or
resolutions [BBC backgrounder] to that effect.

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/10/

NKR President & Leader of Artsakh Eparchy of Armenian Apostolic Chur

NKR PRESIDENT AND LEADER OF ARTSAKH EPARCHY OF ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH DISCUSSED PREPARATION FOR TV MARATHON TO BE HELD IN NOVEMBER

DeFacto Agency
Oct 23 2007
Armenia

October 22 Nagorno-Karabakh Republic President Bako Sahakian received
the leader of the Artsakh Eparchy of the Armenian Apostolic Church
Archbishop Pargev Martirosian.

According to the information DE FACTO received at the Central
Department of Information under NKR President, the interlocutors had
considered ties between the state, church and society. In the course
of the meeting the interlocutors also discussed the issues referring
to preparation works for the organization of a current TV marathon
targeted at fund raising to be held in the U. S. current November.

According To NA Speaker, If There Is Rise In Price Of Sugar In Shop,

ACCORDING TO NA SPEAKER, IF THERE IS RISE IN PRICE OF SUGAR IN SHOP, IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IMPORTER IS GUILTY

Noyan Tapan
Oct 23, 2007

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 23, NOYAN TAPAN. An approximately 60% rise in the
price of sugar has recently been recorded in Armenia. In difference
to the rise in the prices of grain stuffs, organic and vegetable oil,
no tendency for a rise in the price of sugar has been observed in
the world market.

In response to the question of journalists of what is the attitude of
the Republican Party of Armenia towards this fact of the rise in the
price, taking into consideration the fact that the import monopoly of
sugar belongs to Samvel Alexanian, a member of the above-mentioned
party, Tigran Torosian, the Speaker of the RA National Assembly,
said that one should have facts before accusing somebody. In his
words, if there is a rise in the price of food-stuffs in the shop,
this does not mean that it is the importer, who is guilty.

Tigran Torosian mentioned that the rise in the price, which is a result
of natural processes should be seriously studied and discerned from
those cases, when different people try to make an advantage of the
situation for personal interests. "Those, who choose the second way,
should be punished within the limits of law," he mentioned.

According to the Speaker of the National Assembly, this issue should
be regulated by the State Commission for the Protection of the Economic
Competition in the Republic of Armenia. In response to the question of
a Noyan Tapan correspondent of whether there are no flaws in connection
with the regulation of similar issues, the NA Speaker mentioned that
no faction or MP has come up with the initiative on expanding the
competences of the above-mentioned commission so far. Tigran Torosian
suggested that the question concerning the possible steps taken in
the direction of mitigating the consequences of the rise in the price
for the population should be addressed to the government.

Iran And Armenia Should Cooperate Proceeding From Mutual Economic In

IRAN AND ARMENIA SHOULD COOPERATE PROCEEDING FROM MUTUAL ECONOMIC INTERESTS

PanARMENIAN.Net
22.10.2007 19:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Iran is a very important partner for Armenia,
Armenian President Robert Kocharian said at a joint news conference
with Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

"We should cooperate proceeding from mutual economic interests. During
talks with the Iranian delegation a wide scope of issues was
discussed. We specifically focused on energy issues. We agreed on
building of an oil processing plant at the border with Armenia. We
will launch construction of a water power plant and accomplish the
Iran-Armenia gas pipeline. Agreement on construction of a railway
was also achieved," President Kocharian said.