Duke student talks about Armenian ordeal

Durham Herald Sun, NC
Oct 1 2005
Duke student talks about Armenian ordeal

BY PAUL BONNER : The Herald-Sun
[email protected]
Sep 30, 2005 : 10:22 pm ET
DURHAM — Unreality began to set in for Yektan Turkyilmaz about the
time a woman at a counter took his passport and, looking around
nervously — looking everywhere, in fact, but at the passport —
stamped it.
He took two steps and a man who had been following him was joined by
seven or eight others who surrounded him.
Turkyilmaz, a doctoral student at Duke University, was in the airport
in Yerevan, the capital of Armenia, where for six weeks he had been
doing research for his dissertation. He was planning to fly to his
family’s home in Turkey, then return to Duke for the beginning of the
fall semester.
>From June 17, when he was arrested and jailed, until he was convicted
and released on a suspended sentence 60 days later, Turkyilmaz was
the focus of an international outcry over the state of academic
freedom in the former Soviet republic.
His crime: He had 108 secondhand books and pamphlets in his luggage.
Some were old political tracts from the early 20th century. He had
bought them from ordinary secondhand book vendors. They were for his
dissertation research, he told the security agents.
Now back at Duke, Turkyilmaz reflected on his ordeal during an
interview Friday in his office at the John Hope Franklin Institute,
where he is a humanities fellow.
Some of the 20 books that were returned to him are on his shelves
there, still with numbered tags put there by the “KGB.” The agency’s
name translates to “National Security Service.” But even its agents
still refer to themselves by the acronym of the infamous Soviet
internal police, Turkyilmaz said.
Like UFO to captors
Turkyilmaz is Kurdish, of Turkish birth, which alone could raise
suspicions among some Armenians. Animosity by Armenians over their
decimation and forced removal in 1916 from the eastern part of the
region that is now Turkey still smolders.
The books were valuable, he told the agents, but only to him in his
research into modern Turkey’s political genesis in the early 20th
century. And whatever their idea of Turks might be, his research
respects Armenians’ claims of genocide. He speaks Armenian and has
many Armenian friends.
“That wouldn’t make any sense to them,” he said. “The task for me was
to tell them who I was working for. Eventually, they understood what
Duke University was.”
It took them eight hours to list all the books, with Turkyilmaz
helping them decipher some Old Armenian titles. They were more
comfortable with Russian.
At their headquarters, they wanted to know his political views, who
his family was, whom he’d been talking to. Did he have any links to
Turkish intelligence? He answered all their questions until, after
many repetitions, he grew weary.
Then he was put into a prison cell. It measured about 15 feet square,
with two high windows and five beds, although he never had more than
one cellmate and seldom saw anyone else but guards.
In a region that has long been a tinderbox of ethnic strife, he had
trouble persuading his interrogators that he was not defined by it.
“But they have their nationalist, primordial categories in their
minds,” he said. “I was like a UFO, an unidentified object for them.
That’s why they targeted me.”
The unreality became his daily existence. He thought of all the
theoretical works about imprisonment he had read and even taught, and
of Franz Kafka’s famous “The Trial.” At least he got the
Armenian-language immersion course he had wanted, with radio,
newspapers, the few books he was allowed and conversation with his
cellmate.
The law under which he was arrested dealt with missiles and weapons
of mass destruction, lumping with them “strategic raw materials or
cultural values,” which the prosecutor said meant his books.
His cellmate told him that he could be held a year without trial.
When he was permitted a visit, he told a friend, “I don’t think we
should be that optimistic.”
Many people, starting with his dissertation adviser at Duke, Orin
Starn, called attention to Turkyilmaz’s situation and petitioned
Armenian President Robert Kocharian. A letter signed by 225
international scholars, including both Armenians and Turks, called
for his release. The U.S. Embassy in Yerevan went to bat for him.
U.S. Sen. Bob Dole sent a scathing letter, and the next day,
Turkyilmaz got a trial date.
Wants to go back
After his trial and release, he eventually found the Armenian
cultural ministry which prosecutors had said maintained a list of the
culturally significant books, the one on which seven of his titles
supposedly appeared.
“They said, ‘We don’t have a list, but we have the criteria.’ I said,
‘OK, tell me about the criteria and who decides?’ So they say,
‘Council of ministers.’ I say, ‘OK, so what are your criteria?’
‘Cultural significance,’ ” they replied.
He appreciates all the support he received and just wants to resume
where he left off.
“I’m not bitter,” he said. And despite doubts he will ever again be
allowed into Armenia, he would visit again.
“I want to go back, because I don’t want them to win,” he said.
By which he means not the majority of Armenians, who he’s convinced
are embarrassed by their country’s big-brother ways, but “a couple of
old-style people with Soviet style of thinking, with overtones of
xenophobic patriotism.”
Despite having to leave behind many other books and articles he
needed for his dissertation, Turkyilmaz is writing it and plans to be
finished next academic year.
He takes solace in believing that the episode could lead to improved
relations between the two neighbors.
Already, many Armenians have come to appreciate his intellectual
quest and its sponsors.
“Duke is very popular in Armenia these days,” he said.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Finnish President Met Garegin II

FINNISH PRESIDENT MET GAREGIN II
Pan Armenian News
28.09.2005 05:01
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ September 27 the Finnish delegation headed by
President Tarja Halonen met with Catholicos of All Armenians Garegin
II. Justice Minister Davit Harutyunian and Armenian Ambassador Vladimir
Karmirshalian were also present at the meeting, press service of Holy
Echmiadzin Chancellery reported. The Catholicos expressed satisfaction
with the developing Armenian-Finnish relations and noted the brotherly
relations between the Armenian Apostolic Church and the Finnish
Lutheran Church.
Garegin II thanked the Finnish President for the contribution to
the Nagorno Karabakh conflict peaceful settlement. “We believe that
the good must win and there is no other way but living in peace and
cooperation in our region and in the world”, the Catholicos of All
Armenians stated. The parties also discussed the process of Armenia’s
democratization as well as the activities of the Armenian Apostolic
Church in the educational and social fields.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

UN Cup Chess Tournament to take place in Yerevan on Sept. 24

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Sept 23 2005
A CHESS TOURNAMENT FOR THE CUP OF UN TO TAKE PLACE IN YEREVAN ON
SEPTEMBER 24
YEREVAN, September 23. /ARKA/. A chess tournament for the cup of UN
will take place tomorrow in Yerevan. According to the UN Public
Information Department, 40 young chess players aged between 10 and 12
years old, who will compete with famous Armenian grand masters Smbat
Lputyan, Karen Asryan, Tigran Petrosyan and the RA Champion, Grand
Master Ashot Anastasyan, will take part in the tournament, as well as
chess players – representatives of international and local
organizations and mass media. The Chairman of Chess Federation, RA
Minister of Defense Serge Sargsyan, Chairman of the National
Committee of Physical Education and Sport Ishkhan Zakaryan, the
resident representative of UN in Armenia Consuelo Vidal wil take part
in the tournament dated for the 60th anniversary of the ceremony of
opening of the tournament.
The organizers of the tournament are the UN Yerevan Office, Armenian
Chess Federation, RA Sport Committee, Cafesjian Foundation, UN
Armenian Association. A.H. –0–

Presidents gather in Tatarstan

AZG Armenian Daily #152, 27/08/2005
CIS summit
PRESIDENTS GATHER IN TATARSTAN
Kocharian and Aliyev to Meet Today
Russian President Vladimir Putin stated during his March 25 visit to Yerevan
that the CIS is “a useful club” and “a good arena for settling business
issues,” adding that one shouldn’t have too big expectations, otherwise the
disappointment would be unavoidable. “If any state expects to achieve any
goals in the spheres of economic, political or military cooperation,
naturally, that will not happen, as could never have happened,” Mr. Putin
stated, adding that, “certainly, the CIS should be preserved.”
The next meeting of the presidents of the CIS member countries is envisaged
to take place in Tatarstan. This time they will discuss “suggestions
directed to the improvement of the CIS structures, as well as the
cooperation of the CIS states in the humanitarian sphere.” Besides, the
presidents will participate in the arrangements dedicated to 1000th
anniversary of the country’s capital Kazan.
This club of 12 former Soviet republics that undertook various political
priorities has adopted about 3000 decrees during the past 15 years. Most of
these decrees were not carried out. Moreover, in fact, Armenia and
Azerbaijan, members of the same organization, are in war condition, while
Georgia has deep contradictions with Russia. There are serious disagreement
cases between Russia and Moldova, Georgia and Byelorussia, Ukraine and
Russia, etc.
Anyway, the CIS summits are important for Armenia because the president can
have a number of bilateral meetings with his colleagues. “The CIS is a good
arena for settling business issues. We should be glad that we have such an
arena, because the level and the volume of the cooperation between the
countries are really big. There are always serious themes and issues for
discussions and certain decisions. I meet with three of my colleagues, at
least, during each of the CIS Summit. And these meetings are quite
fruitful,” RA President Robert Kocharian said at the joint press conference
during Vladimir Putin’s last visit in Yerevan.
The CIS served the forum that enabled to hold dozens of meetings for the
Armenian and the Azeri presidents. They are going to meet in Kazan, as well.
This summit is important for Armenia, Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan for
the very negotiations between Robert Kocharian and Ilham Aliyev. The meeting
of the presidents is envisaged on August 27.
It’s worth reminding that Foreign Ministers Vartan Oskanian and Elmar
Mamediarov have already discussed the current stage of Nagorno Karabakh
negotiations with the participation of the OSCE Minsk group co-chairs in
Moscow, on August 24. If on the eve of the July visit of the co-chairs, the
sides had rather optimistic expectations from the meeting of the presidents
in Kazan, today they are skeptical. Anyway, the Azeri side sees no
breakthrough in the negotiations.
By Tatoul Hakobian
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Aliyev receives PACE president Rene Van Der Linden

PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJAN ILHAM ALIYEV RECEIVES PACE PRESIDENT RENE VAN
DER LINDEN
[August 22, 2005, 20:39:41]
President of the Azerbaijani Republic Ilham Aliyev received the
President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Rene
van der Linden, 22 August.
Head of the Azerbaijan State mentioned his meeting with the PACE
President in Warsaw, noting that the meeting set up good chances for
discussion of the questions of mutual interest. Stating that huge
works are being realized in the country for democratization of
society, President Ilham Aliyev expressed confidence the visit of
PSCE President would serve closer familiarization with the
development process in Azerbaijan.
Mr. Rene van der Linden noted the Council of Europe supports the
process of reforms in Azerbaijan. Underlining that settlement of the
Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno Karabakh conflict is the major question
for Azerbaijan Mr. Linden expressed consent for peacemaking efforts
of Azerbaijan in this direction. PACE President said that during his
visit to Armenia he has discussed the issue with the Armenian side
either and expressed hope for sooner resolution to the problem.
In the meetings, also discussed were other questions of mutual
interest.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Commentary: Some Myths Are Dangerous

Commentary: Some Myths Are Dangerous
By GERALD SCHMAVONIAN
Berkeley Daily Planet
Edition Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2005
As a former resident of Berkeley, I and many of my friends, also Cal
graduates now living in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys, enjoy
reading the Daily Planet online. So it was especially disheartening
to read the past several issues of the Planet, and the outrageously
racist, anti-Jewish and anti-Arab comments made by numerous letter
writers.
The comments ranged from the ludicrous to the insidious. Mr. Richey
(Aug. 7) attacked Mr. Gertz’s skullcap as the “Funniest looking
yarmulke I ever saw.” If Mr. Gertz wants to wear a lampshade on his
head, that’s no one’s business but his own.
Mr. Hardesty (Aug. 7) attacked Mr. Spitzer’s loyalty to the United
States. “If you are really such a great Zionist, Spitzer, go live
in Israel.” Americans have the constitutionally inherent right to
verbally attack or verbally defend any nation, including Israel,
without being labeled a traitor or threatened with expulsion.
Joanna Graham (Aug. 2) writes, “1967 is demonstrably the year in which
American Jews en masse converted to Zionism.” In 1967, I was a student
at Cal and most of the people I knew (including Jewish-Americans)
came to regard Israel in that year, not as the land of kibbutzniks
skipping down the furrows hand in hand, but as a militant, racist,
jingoistic state. None of them converted to Zionism “en masse.”
Lawrence White (Aug. 5) attacks Mark Richey for his temerity as
a foreigner (?) from Cotati to attack “the character of a Berkeley
citizen [John Gertz].” I never realized Berkeley issued passports and
had its own citizens. I believe residents of Cotati and residents of
Berkeley can both be citizens of the United States.
But Mr. White is just getting started. He then makes the claim that
the thesis of a Jewish conspiracy “had the logical consequence of
the murder of six million.” Does he mean that if six million were not
murdered that would be an illogical consequence? Or does he mean that
criticism leads to genocide when it is directed at specific groups
which should, thus, be exempt from all criticism?
Mr. White, obviously confused, then poses a number of questions
which I would like to answer. He asks: “If the occupation is the
problem, how come the Arabs launched three wars (1948, 1956, 1967)
before the occupation began?” Mr. White perhaps subscribes to the
notion that people are more apt to believe a big lie than a small
one. This is a prime example of an orchestrated lie, which through
countless mindful repetitions conducted with a complete disregard to
the historical record begins to appear “factual.” According to all
historical sources, all major encyclopedias, including the Jewish
Encyclopedia, all three wars (1948, 1956, and 1967) were launched by
Israel. And, to Israel, each new conquest became a new starting point
for negotiation. Mr. White fails to mention the only Arab-Israeli
war really launched by the Arab side was the Yom Kippur War, launched
by Anwar Sadat in 1973. But Sadat never attacked Israel proper, but
only the Sinai Peninsula, which was Egyptian territory that Israel
had occupied a few years earlier in 1967.
Mr. White continues “And how come the Palestine Liberation Organization
was established before there was an occupation? What were they trying
to liberate?” I refer Mr. White again to any major encyclopedia,
including the Jewish Encyclopedia, all of which show detailed maps
of the United Nations’ division of Palestine into Jewish and Arab
states. In the 1948 war, Israel conquered much of the proposed
Palestinian state and subsequently expelled through intimidation
and murder many of the local Palestinian people who were living
there. That, Mr. White, is the occupation the Palestine Liberation
Organization was trying to liberate.
His next query is equally unintelligible “How come Germans don’t send
suicide bombers into Poland to get back land they lost during World
War II?” To remind Mr. White, Nazi Germany was the aggressor during
WWII. Germany attacked and conquered Poland, not vice versus. The
proper analogy would be if the Nazis had won WWII and consequently
conquered and destroyed Poland, would Poles have the right to send
bombers into Polish-Germany to get their nation back? And should
we support those Poles or “let bygones be bygones” regarding the
Holocaust? In fact, Mr. White, if the Palestinians didn’t fight
against being dispossessed and dehumanized, it would be a travesty
and tragedy for all free peoples.
Next his inventive mind leaps again. This time he claims “a million
Jews were forcibly expelled from Egypt, Libya, Iraq and other Arab
countries.” Actually, those countries at the time, were ruled by
Western-installed, pro-Western monarchies, none of which expelled
any Jews to Israel. In fact, it was Israel’s policy to conduct
“Magic Carpet” flights to bring Jews from all over the Middle East to
Israel to populate it with Jews. The emigration was totally voluntary.
British and American planes airlifted the Jews to Israel. And according
to Alaska Airlines (one of the main carriers involved), the mission
was accomplished without a single loss of life.
Since Mr. White feels no imperative to cite any sources, his
hare-brained fables continue unabated: “not one (Palestinian) votes
in any Arab country.” In fact, Jordanian citizens of Palestinian
descent do vote, as do Lebanese citizens of Palestinian descent,
etc., etc. (just as American citizens of Palestinian descent may
vote.) In fact, only “Israeli-citizen” Palestinians can vote in
Israel, none of the four million Palestinians living in Gaza and
the West Bank have any voting rights in Israel despite having lived
under Israeli rule for two generations (38 years). Israel emulates
formerly apartheid South Africa’s policy of excluding blacks from
voting by saying they were “citizens” of Bantustans (tribal homelands)
and legally not citizens of South Africa proper and consequently had
no right to vote. This allowed apartheid South Africa to claim that
it was “the only democracy on the entire continent of Africa.” Mr.
White, rather than offer smug, insincere, and misleading assertions
regarding the suffering of an oppressed people, do some research. To
demonize the victim and portray the oppressor as the oppressed, not
only requires a manipulation and distortion of history, it also takes
a cruel person to perpetrate and perpetuate such a hoax.
Rabbi Sara Shendelman (Aug. 12) encourages readers to “see both sides,”
then proceeds to praise Lawrence White’s commentary “for its attempt to
educate” the opposition. Posturing and exhorting “in a community that
is 25 percent Jewish,” is she trying to intimidate the Daily Planet
by numbers? It shouldn’t matter what percent of what the community
is comprised of. True is true and untrue is untrue. Politics is a
numbers game, but education should not be. The Rabbi must be leading
a very insular life when she makes a blanket statement such as “We
[Berkeley] are probably the most intolerant place in the U.S. when
faced with a differing view.”
John Gertz (Aug.7) demonstrates his total lack of historic knowledge
by making so many ignorant and false statements that they almost defy
comment. But in the interest of fairness, I will include him. He
writes that Islam is the only religion spread by an army. If Mr.
Gertz thinks only Islam has a bloody history of conquest, I refer
him to the Old Testament. If he is unacquainted as to where to
look: Check out Joshua. Also, anyone with a smattering of knowledge
regarding the spread of Christianity knows that Christianity barely
made any headway in its first few hundred years (only the Armenian
nation had converted to the new faith). But then along came “By This
Sign You Shall Conquer” Constantine. Gertz continues that Islam “is
a religion that teaches that it has superseded all others.” Duh! So
does Judaism, Christianity, and all other religions. It is, in fact,
the very definition of any religion that it supersede all others.
Otherwise, why would anyone convert?
David Altschul (Aug. 8) asks “What governments in the Middle East
allow women to drive cars, go to school, hold jobs, etc., etc….well,
there’s Israel.” This duplicitous phrasing is obviously meant to
mislead and deceive uninformed readers to think only Israel allows
women any rights. In fact, the majority of Middle Eastern governments
allow women these rights. And, interestingly, most of the ones that
don’t allow women these rights are Americas’s closest friends and
military allies in the region. He continues: “What government has
used the schools and TV stations it controls to teach its children
that the best thing they can grow up to be is a suicide bomber? The
Palestinian Authority.” I challenge Mr. Altschul to prove this claim.
When on the defensive, these same tired lies are always trotted out
in hopes they’ll go unchallenged and through countless repetitions
dupe some uninformed people. People, such as Mr. Altschul, who
rely on lies to support occupation and suppression, must perpetuate
stereotypes. If one oppresses people with violence, they will react
with violence. That is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Lastly, people who love to bandy about terms such as Islamofacists,
but are appalled at the Zionazi moniker because of the historical
oppression of Jews by
Nazis should take into account that the first peoples attacked by
fascists (Mussolini) were Islamic peoples (Somalis, Eritreans, and
Libyans). And just as in the case of the Jews, the world did nothing.
Gerald Schmavonian live in Fresno.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Your Choice Armenian NGO Launches Own Website

YOUR CHOICE ARMENIAN NGO LAUNCHES OWN WEBSITE
YEREVAN, August 11. /ARKA/. Your Choice Armenian NGO opened its
website The organizations’ initiatives on democratic
election conduction, monitoring reports on presidential, parliamentary
and local government elections will be placed on the site as well as
those on legislation improvement. Public discussions over
constitutional amendments are also to be organized. According to the
organization’s press release, the site will be regularly updated.
Your Choice NGO functions from 1996 in the area of elections
monitoring in the country. The organization’s mission is to promote
transparent and democratic elections in the republic and public
participation in the processes of running communities as well as
providing comprehensive information to voters. The organization has
offices in Armenia’s all provinces of and Yerevan’s districts. Some 4
thousand volunteers are involved in the NGO’s activities. M.V. -0–
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.iyc.am.

Two Cases Of Trafficking To The Emirates

TWO CASES OF TRAFFICKING TO THE EMIRATES
Arpine Haroutinunyan works for Hetq, an internet-based investigative
magazine, the following story is based on interviews for the Team Reporting
Project
By Arpine Haroutiunyan
Hetq Online
“My friend Armenuhi deceived me” says Narine. “She promised me a
well-paid job in the United Arab Emirates. So I went. Once I got
there she took my passport and forced me into prostitution to make
money for her.”
Narine (her name has been changed at her request) is 34 years old
and she lives in Vanadzor – Armenia’s third largest city, in the
northeast, 120 kilometers from the capital, Yerevan. Officially,
Vanadzor is supposed to have a population of 120,000. But 30,000
or 40,000 people leave every year in search of work. Unofficially,
the population is considered much closer to 50,000. A disastrous
earthquake in1988 killed at least 800 people, left tens of thousands
without homes or jobs, and shattered the economy.
We met Narine in her one-room apartment where she lives with her two
sons on the outskirts of Vanadzor. When she returned from the Emirates
no one would take her in, so she was forced to rent the single room,
which has only one chair and a small table-the family usually sits
on a mattress on the floor.
There is no heat. For months they haven’t been able to pay for
electricity and it is often colder inside the apartment than
outside. Narine has to borrow money for bread.
Her husband was killed in Russia. Narine’s mother told us that he fled
Vanadzor after resorting to stealing. He never sent money from Russia,
and Narine’s relatives have been helping her to survive. She worked
as a clerk in a local store, but couldn’t support her family on what
she earned. So she took her friend Armenuhi’s advice and left for the
Emirates. She hoped that she would find a job in a store or cafe and
save some money. “Armenuhi and I had been friends since childhood,”
she explains. “I always trusted her and she was good to me. It never
occurred to me that that she could treat me like this.” Armenuhi
left Vanadzor for the Emirates in the spring of 2001, and then in
July invited Narine and a woman named Ofelia to join her. The women
didn’t know that their friend was involved in prostitution; Armenuhi
said she had been working as a seamstress. Narine left her boys with
a friend, R. B., and set off.
Armenuhi’s brother drove Narine to the airport, and Armenhui met
Narine when she landed in the Emirates. she immediately took her
passport. Then her attitude changed dramatically. “She told me that
I had to work as a prostitute or else I could stay there and rot,”
says Narine. “She said I had to give her $10,000 to get my passport
back. She found Ofelia a place in a cafe,” Narine says. Armenuhi
had been renting an apartment in a place called the Laundry Building
in Abu Dhabi . Narine worked there for nearly eight months, making
up to $200 an hour. She received six or seven men a day. She was
often treated cruelly, beaten, and forced to work even when she was
sick. As a rule, Armenuhi would take the money in advance, promising
to divide it up afterwards. Narine says she was not the only one in
this situation. There were many Armenian girls, some as young as 16
or 17. While in the Emirates, Narine periodically sent money to her
children – about $1,250 over the course of eight months. “I couldn’t
stay there anymore, I was like an object, like a slave. Sometimes the
Arab men would see me crying and spare me, they wouldn’t touch me,”
Narine recalls.
One day Narine noticed some stitches in her mattress; she ripped it
open and discovered her passport. She confronted Armenuhi and demanded
the money she had earned, but Armenuhi refused to pay her. In the end,
Narine was helped by an Arab man, who bought her a plane ticket and
sent her back to Armenia in April 2002. Narine was met at the Yerevan
airport by Armenuhi’s brother, who was accompanied by two friends,
one of whom was a police officer. A few days after she returned to
Vanadzor, the p;olice officer who had met her and another policeman
took her a detective with the Vanadzor police, who was nicknamed
Rambo. “Rambo asked me in an angry tone why hadn’t come to see him and
whether I knew that he was in charge of the girls returning from the
Emirates,” Narine explains. “Then he threatened me by saying that he
would deprive me of my parental rights if I didn’t write down what he
dictated, and he demanded $500. I wrote down everything that happened
to me in the Emirates.”
Narine told Armenhui’s brother about her declaration, and asked that
his sister pay her the money she was owed – $8,750. She took $200 from
him, on the condition that he would give her the rest later. Narine
says the brother signed a paper stating that the money was for
sexual exploitation. But then he consulted with Rambo about what
to do next. Rambo threatened Narine again and told her to leave the
brother alone, insisting that Armenuhi didn’t owe her anything. Narine
believes that Rambo was behind all of it. “Rambo told me that he was
in charge of this affair and I had to check everything with him. Rambo
was informed about everything-he knew that Armenuhi owed me money
and wanted to get something out of it, too,” she explains.
Narine informed both the Armenian police and the Foreign Ministry
of what had happened to her. On June 17, 2003, she received a letter
from the ministry stating, “In reference to your letter of June, 3,
2003 we would like to inform you that according to the information we
have received from the Police and Transport departments of the Lori
Marz, from 1990 to 2003, Vanadzor residents Vanadzor Armenuhi Simonyan
and her brother Artak Simonyan recruited and sent to the United Arab
Emirates for sexual exploitation a number of women, including residents
of Vanadzor. The Prosecutor’s Office of Armenia is now investigating
the case. Measures are being taken to locate Armenuhi Simonyan.”
Narine does not work now. She had a job at a bakery for a while,
but she left because the salary was too low, and her health was
poor-she has had serious kidney trouble since she returned from the
Emirates. Her children have not attended school for a year-an-a-half
– they don’t have textbooks, school supplies, or clothes. All her
relatives have abandoned them. “I understand that my daughter was
deceived. But I cannot forgive her anyway; she wouldn’t listen to us,
and she led an immoral life,” says Narine’s mother, Hasmik.
Narine has appealed to some international organizations, and they have
promised to help her defend her rights. “I will fight until Armenuhi
returns the money I earned-$8,750. She deals with big money and our
police officers profit from it,” she insists.
Charges have been filed in the case and the Office of the Prosecutor
General is in charge of the investigation. Armenuhi used to
visit Armenia a few times a year, but hasn’t done so since Narine
filed her complaint. Her contacts keep her informed her about the
investigation. Other woman from Vanadzor besides Narine fell victim to
Armenuhi Simonyan. They were afraid to meet with us. The mother of one
of them told us that her daughter was mentally disturbed and couldn’t
talk. Ofelia, who went to the Emirates with Narine, agreed to speak
with us. But in Vanadzor, we were met by her daughter instead. “Armen
Tamazyan, an investigator from the prosecutor’s office, told us that
you are not authorized to meet with us. My mother will not tell you
anything. The lawyers gave us the same advice,” she said.
The new Criminal Code of Armenia, which came into force on August 1,
2003, contains a provision on human trafficking: “Driving people to
prostitution or other forms of sexual exploitation, to forced labor
or services, to slavery or to a state equivalent to slavery or to a
subordinate condition, as well as recruiting, transporting, hiding
or receiving people in order to obtain their organs, is subject to
punishment in the form of a fine from 300 to 500 times the minimum
wage, or corrective labor for up to one year, or detention for up
to two months, or incarceration in prison from one to four years,”
reads Article 132 of the Criminal Code.
Rafik Giulnazaryan, senior assistant to the Prosecutor General,
says he helped Narine Karapetyan write her appeal. He advised her to
mention procuring and recruiting women. This was in 2001, under the
old Criminal Code, which had no provision on human trafficking, but
contained only one relevant article – #226- which defined punishment
for procuring and recruiting.
After Narine Karapetyan filed her complaint against Armenuhi Simonyan,
However, Giulnazaryan says, the investigation ascertained that Armenuhi
Simonyan was not a procurer but a go-between. Her main occupation was
prostitution. “Armenuhi Simonyan assists a number of procurers. When
she visits Armenia , she just happens to take some women back with
her to the Emirates. We know who the main procurers are. We are going
to bring them back to Armenia ,” Giulnazaryan says.
He also suggests that Narine Karapetyan, who went to the United Arab
Emirates with a group of other women from Vanadzor, probably knew in
advance where she was going and why. Among the women recruited by
Armenuhi Simonyan, only Narine has complained. She maintains that
Armenuhi had promised her a job at a factory, saying, “Armenuhi
deceived me, and she took the money I earned – $8,750. I want my
money back.” And Giulnazaryan explains: “The money Narine Karapetyan
earned must be returned not by Armenuhi but by their principal
procurer. Armenuhi paid the money she took from Narine to people who
were above her.”
Narine Karapetyan has also accused several law enforcement
officers. She insists that they too were involved in the affair. “I
consider that to be nonsense and provocation,” Giulnazaryan says. “We
have no evidence at all regarding these people. They are not involved
in this business.”
It is not clear yet how long this case will take,” Giulnazaryan
concludes.
“The lawyers say there won’t be much progress until the procurers
are brought back. And no one can say when that will happen. “We are
interested to see the case resolved in Narine’s favor. She lives in
really very hard conditions. But it is still obscure why she’s the
only one who lost out. The others don’t complain; some of them are
even very happy.”
“They catch the procurers, take money, and let them go” “My life
is ruined. There’s nothing I can do to change it. I’m lost, and I
don’t know how long I can live like this,” says 38-year-old Mary
Hovhannissian (the victims’ names have been changed).
Mary lives in Yerevan with her parents and brother. But her family
doesn’t know what she does for a living. She tries hard to make sure
that no one knows that she earns money through prostitution. “I’m
forced to do this since I can’t find any other job,” Mary tells
us quietly, as we talk in a cafe. In 1997 she met a man named
Seryozha. She was working as a waitress at the time, but her salary
was so low she couldn’t support her family.
“Seryozha told me that there were well-paid jobs in Greece and we could
make some money. He said we could buy a house when we came back-in
short, we could live safely,” Mary Hovhannissyan agreed. Seryozha took
her passport, ostensibly to buy tickets. At the airport on the day
they left, Seryozha said that first they would go to Dubai , then to
Greece . “Seryozha told me that we would get some money in Dubai and
then go on. But he tricked me and left me in Dubai ,” Mary explains.
A woman met them at the Dubai airport. Seryozha gave her Mary’s
passport and disappeared. Later Mary learned that Seryozha had brought
other women to the United Arab Emirates. She was told that she had
been “sold” and that she wouldn’t get her passport back until she paid
$6,000. “I was outside Armenia for the first time, and I didn’t know
what to do. I didn’t speak the language, I didn’t know the city, and I
had no money. I couldn’t even make a phone call,” Mary explains. She
was placed at the Rock Al Hadi hotel in Abu Dhabi. She earned $6,000
within a few months, but her passport was not returned. It was sold
for $3,000 to another Armenian woman. So Mary was required to earn
an additional $3,000 to free herself from the second procurer. After
paying off this sum, Mary was “sold” again. “So I was passed from hand
to hand and suffered like a slave. They beat me up if I refused or was
unable to work. They wouldn’t give me any medicine when I was sick. I
had no friends, I couldn’t trust anybody. Besides, the procurers
created such an atmosphere that girls would inform on each other,”
Mary recalls.
One of Mary’s procurers was called Marietta. She was the boss,
and other procurers in the Emirates – Anahit, Nano, Nelli, Zhanna –
worked for her.
The procurers were staying in a different hotel. Each of them had
from 10 to 15 girls, along with their passports.
Mary received fifteen or twenty men a day and was paid $13 for five
minutes.
She says that under-age girls were paid up to $200 for five
minutes. Their main clients were Arab men, who preferred Armenian
girls. According to Mary, there were a lot of Armenian women in Dubai ,
from fifteen to thirty years old. Mary made about $400 a day, of which
she was allowed to keep only $100-the rest went to the procurers. In
the course of six months in Dubai she made about $15,000.
In February 1997, Mary was arrested by the Dubai police. She was
imprisoned for three months. “The conditions in jail were horrible. I
kept getting sick. I could barely stand the life there. I almost
went crazy,” Mary recalls. In May 1997 she was deported from the
Emirates. She returned to Armenia exhausted and penniless. She didn’t
file any complaints-she was afraid that they wouldn’t believe her,
or would blame everything on her. She tried and failed to find work
as seamstress, her profession. So she went back to the life she fell
into in Dubai . Today she can be seen in the neighborhood of the
Ararat movie theater in Yerevan, working as a prostitute.
Mary blames law enforcement above all for the “sale” of herself
and other such women. “It’s their fault. They pretend to catch the
procurers, but they take money and let them go. That’s how they dealt
with the procurer who sold me, Marietta . They took the money and
set her free. As for Seryozha, he was never held responsible-he left
for Russia
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

A muslim as president of Russia?

Agency WPS
What the Papers Say. Part A (Russia)
July 25, 2005, Monday
A MUSLIM AS PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA?
SOURCE: Ekspert, No. 27, July 18, 2005, pp. 66-69
by Valery Egozarian, head of the Inter-Ethnic Relations Center at the
Social Forecasting Institute
Our Constitution specifies that the person elected as head of state
may be of any ethnicity, and – no less relevantly, perhaps – any
religion. Could Orthodox Russia, with its ancient Christian
traditions, its spiritual culture and art permeated with
Christianity, elect a non-Christian as president? The very question
seems unrealistic and improper at first. But let’s not jump to
conclusions.
For a start, let’s look at the membership numbers of Russia’s
religious faiths and their competitive chances in elections. These
numbers are approximate, of course, but it is indisputable that only
Muslims can offer real political competition to the Orthodox in the
foreseeable future.
In the present circumstances, with tension in Christian-Muslim
relations being artificially escalated worldwide, considering the
active participation of Russia’s Muslims in Russian politics is no
idle exercise. In speaking of active participation, we mean not just
voting in Duma elections, regional leader elections, and presidential
elections, but creating a powerful Islamic political lobby group
capable of engaging in real politics, consolidating its voters based
on religious faith, and getting its own candidate elected as head of
state.
Is it realistic to imagine Russia electing a Muslim president?
Tackling the question head-on, there seems to be every reason to say
no: a simple numerical comparison of 69 million Orthodox Christians
and 7.5 million Muslims does not favor the later. Nevertheless, it’s
not all that simple. For one thing, neither the Christian nor the
Muslim communities of Russia are entirely straightforward in terms of
religious identification.
Of Russia’s 145 million people, 15% are atheists and 14% are
religious but don’t belong to any particular faith: that’s a total of
about 33 million. For these people, religious distinctions (not
ethnic distinctions!) are not a priority; all the same, we can assume
that this part of the population would not be so indifferent to the
religious faith of an elected president.
Next, let’s look at the ambiguous situation of Russia’s Orthodox
Christians.
The official website of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) offers no
statistics about the number of Orthodox Christians in Russia or
elsewhere. Neither do state statistical agencies have this date.
Various estimates fluctuate between 50 million and 80 million people.
These figures are probably inaccurate. First of all, the number of
parishes is inconsistent with such a number of believers. How many
worshippers per parish? Probably an average of around 500, or much
fewer in rural areas. But then Russia would need to have at least
100,000 parishes for even 50 million believers! The Patriarch’s
report puts the number of parishes at around 14,000. Therefore, the
number of true Orthodox Christian believers is around 7 million.
Polls done by the Social Forecasting Institute indicate that of the
respondents who identify as Orthodox Christians, 10.7% go to church
regularly. The figures are almost identical.
But observing the Ten Commandments is by no means the same thing as
electing a president. Thus, if it comes to a choice between a Muslim
and a Christian, we can confidently supplement these 7 million
Orthdox believers by adding their family members, “passive”
believers, and Russia’s million Armenians – not Orthodox, but
Christians, with their own historical considerations regarding Islam.
Given that not all these believers and family members are over 18,
the number of voters in Russia to whom a candidate’s religion matters
a great deal is probably around 25 million – that’s around 22% of
citizens with the right to vote.
What’s more, the demographic situation in Russia and the other
Orthodox former Soviet states is catastrophic. Our population is
melting away.
In 1900, 8.5% of the world’s population was Orthodox Christian; by
2025, this figure is predicted to be 4.9%. In 1980, Orthodox
countries produced 16.4% of global GDP; by the end of the 20th
Century, that figure had fallen to 6.2%. The crisis of Orthodoxy is
plain to see.
Between 1989 and 1999, the proportion of Muslims in Russia rose from
8% to 10%; in 1959, it had only been 6%. The Russian Council of
Muftis claims that there are now 20 million Muslims in our country.
This figure may be greatly exaggerated, but it’s worth noting that
according to various analysts, Russia now has around 20 million
illegal aliens, a great many of whom are Muslims from Central Asia
and Azerbaijan. A little more, and there will no longer be any formal
grounds for describing Russia as an essentially Christian state.
If the number of Muslims in Russia continues growing at the present
rate, a century from now their proportion of Russia’s population will
double. According to forecasts, by 2100 Muslims are likely to make up
16-18% of the population: that is, around 20 million people. If the
number of Orthodox Christians continues to decline, by that time – or
possibly earlier – these two parts of Russia’s population will be
equal: the Orthodox and Muslims.
Some of Russia’s Muslims have been politically active for a number of
years, uniting on the basis of their faith. There are nationwide
political organizations such as the Pan-Russian Islamic Congress,
Refakh (Prosperity), Mejlis (Gathering), and the Islamic Committee. A
new movement called Russian Islamic Heritage held its inaugural
congress on March 22. Among the 20 public organizations with the
right to field candidates in presidential elections is Nur (Light), a
nationwide public movement. The Muslims of Russia movement has
already tried to score campaign points by reporting that it might
join the Communist Party’s bloc.
And this niche will only increase. Therefore, the idea of Russia
having a Muslim president doesn’t seem so improbable after all.
Translated by Pavel Pushkin
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Pan-Armenian Second Youth Congress To Launch Today

PAN-ARMENIAN SECOND YOUTH CONGRESS TO LAUNCH TODAY
Azg/arm
21 July 05
The second pan-Armenian youth congress organized by the Pan-Armenian
International Youth Center will launch in Tsakhkadzor today and will
last till July 28.
Government’s decision of 2002 set the Center to contribute to
fostering relations between international youth organizations in
Armenia and Diaspora.
The Executive director of the Center, Armen Sinanian, gave
scarce information on the event. He said that 80 young people from
international youth organizations will participate in the congress.
Sinanian said that they chose the participants based on their
applications that considered the age (aged 18-35) and a number of other
parameters. Pan-Armenian International Youth Center has widened its
geography of this year including participants from Nagorno Karabakh
and 10 foreign countries (contrary to 17 countries last year). The
agenda of the congress includes visits to governmental organs,
business circles and to army regiments.
The Center, which gets annual subsidies of 50 million drams, will
receive 7 million for the congress.
By Gohar Gevorgian
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress