Mediators present plan to end Nagorno Karabakh dispute

Agence France Presse — English
November 29, 2007 Thursday 5:35 PM GMT

Mediators present plan to end Nagorno Karabakh dispute

MADRID, Nov 29 2007

An international group mediating the dispute between Armenia and
Azerbaijan over the separatist region of Nagorno-Karabakh said
Thursday it had presented both sides with a plan to end the conflict.

It is "an official offer of the three mediating countries to propose
to the sides to discuss the overall concept of conflict settlement,"
said Bernard Fassier, the French co-president of the OSCE’s Minsk
group which is mediating the dispute.

He declined to provide details, but said it is "not a new proposal.

"It’s a comprehensive presentation of all the basic principles which
could pave the way for drafting a peace settlement," he told
journalists on the sidelines of the annual meeting of foreign
ministers of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OSCE).

He said the offer was handed to the foreign ministers of both
countries so that they "will have a basis for discussion at any
moment," particularly in view of upcoming presidential elections in
both Armenia and in Azerbaijan.

Nagorno-Karabakh’s break from Azerbaijan in 1991 precipitated a
full-blown war between the former Soviet republic and its neighbour
Armenia, claiming some 25,000 lives before ending with a ceasefire in
1994. The region’s status remains unsettled, despite years of
diplomatic talks.

The Minsk Group was created in 1992 by the OSCE to bring about a
peaceful resolution between the two countries.

The co-chairs of the Minsk group are Russia, the United States and
France.

Representatives of the group plan to travel to Armenia and Azerbaijan
by the end of January to gauge the views of both governments to the
plan, Fassier said.

About 40 countries are attending the conference of the OSCE, Europe’s
security watchdog, which runs until Friday.

Town weighs break with ADL program

Boston Globe, MA
Dec 2 2007

Town weighs break with ADL program

By Laura M. Colarusso
Globe Correspondent / December 2, 2007

Needham officials are facing a decision on whether to remain in the
Anti-Defamation League’s No Place for Hate program, or leave over the
ADL’s refusal to refine its stance that the atrocities committed by
the Ottoman Empire against the Armenians are "tantamount to
genocide."

more stories like thisThe Needham Human Rights Committee has
recommended to the Board of Selectmen that the town suspend its ties
to the program, which supports efforts to combat racism and bigotry.

The committee had wanted the ADL to clarify its position by dropping
the word "tantamount" during its national commission meeting last
month.

The vote on the fate of No Place for Hate in Needham could come as
early as Tuesday, said Gerald Wasserman, chairman of the Board of
Selectmen. Several other municipalities, including Newton and
Watertown, have withdrawn from the program over the ADL’s position.

Myrna Shinbaum, a spokeswoman for the national ADL, said the
organization "has nothing more to say" about its perspective on the
Armenian genocide, except that leaving the No Place For Hate program
"would be an injustice" for Needham.

"We hope the selectmen will reject the recommendation of the Human
Rights Committee," Shinbaum said in a written statement. "ADL
provides a wealth of expertise in fighting hate and promoting
diversity," she said, and the No Place for Hate program "has proven
to be an important resource for the people of Needham."

Several members of the Board of Selectmen expressed concern that the
ADL has not acquiesced to calls for changing its stance. Selectman
John Cogswell said he would support the Human Rights Committee’s
recommendation "until such time as the ADL changes their position."

Selectman John Bulian praised the committee for its "slow and
measured approach" to the issue.

"Yes, we hang on words, but words are important," Bulian said. "There
is no question that a genocide occurred. . . . I just think that we
have to be open to elements of tragedies that have occurred in
history and recognize them for what they are."

The antibias program, which has provided funding for tolerance and
diversity education in roughly 60 communities statewide, has been
surrounded by controversy since August, when the ADL fired its top
New England executive, Andrew Tarsy, for going beyond the national
group’s position in recognizing the Armenian genocide. He has since
been reinstated.

Needham’s Human Rights Committee sent a letter in September to the
ADL, asking that it reconsider its position and support legislation
labeling as genocide the mass killings of more than 1 million
Armenians between 1915 and 1923. When the ADL decided not to take
further action, members voted 6-1 to recommend the town distance
itself from the No Place for Hate program, said Debbie Watters,
committee chairwoman.

The ADL has recognized the genocide and is allowing its officials to
use that term, according to Michael Sheetz, a Needham resident and a
20-year member of the ADL.

There is no ambiguity in the organization’s policy toward the
Armenians, said Sheetz, who has represented the ADL before the town’s
Human Rights Committee.

"How can you throw out all the good that’s been done just because you
disagree with the wording of a press release?" Sheetz asked. "It’s
semantics over substance."

Co-Reporters Of PACE Monitoring Group Arrived In Armenia

CO-REPORTERS OF PACE MONITORING GROUP ARRIVED IN ARMENIA

arminfo
2007-12-03 15:07:00

ArmInfo. PACE Monitoring Committee Co-reporters George Colombie and
Neven Mimica, as well as the Commission Secretary Despina Chatsivasiliu
arrived in Armenia the day before.

As RA Parliament’s press-service reports, meetings of the co-reporters
with CoE countries’ ambassadors, accredited in Armenia, representatives
of public organizations and Mass Media have been scheduled for
today. Moreover, the co-reporters will be received today by Chairman
of RA Court of Cassation Hovhannes Manukyan and Head of the Court
Department Arsen Lazarian, Minister of Territorial Administration,
vice Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan, Chairman of RA Constitutional
Court Gagik Harutyunyan and RA ombudsman Armen Harutyunyan.

Meetings of the co-reporters with RA Justice Minister Gevork Danielyan,
Prosecutor General Aghvan Hovsepyan, Yerevan Mayor Yervand Zakharyan,
Head of Police Haik Harutyunyan, Head of CEC Garegin Azaryan, Chairman
of the TV and Radio Council Alexan Harutyunyan, Chairman of the
Commission on the Anticorruption Strategy Implementation Monitoring,
RA President assistant Gevork Mheryan and Defense Minister Mikael
Harutyunyan have been scheduled on December 4.

On December 5, PACE Monitoring Commission co-reporters will visit the
Armenian Parliament, where their meetings with the "Heritage", "Orinats
Yerkir", ARFD, "Prosperous Armenia", RPA faction members, as well as
Heads of Commissions on state-legal issues, human rights protection,
public issues and foreign relations have been scheduled. The meetings
in the Parliament will be completed by the meeting with its speaker
Tigran Torossyan. The same day, the co-reporters will be received by
RA President Robert Kocharyan and Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan. The
delegation will leave Yerevan on December 6.

National Archives Exhibits Materials Of Garzu

NATIONAL ARCHIVE EXHIBITS MATERIALS OF GARZU

Panorama.am
19:31 03/12/2007

This year is the 100th anniversary of famous French Armenian artist
Garzu (Garnik Zulumyan). Different cultural establishments organize
events on the occasion. Today the National Archive opened an exhibition
of materials related to Garzu.

"Ninety percent of the materials are from the archive document. Some
materials are brought from the museum of Martiros Saryan, and the
personal archives of Shahen Khachatryan and Vardges Hamazaspyan.

"The archive exhibits the letters of Garzu, his wife’s letters,
official letters addressed to the artists and congratulations notes,"
department head at the National Archive Marine Martiosyan said.

BAKU: US Diplomat Upbeat On Latest Peace Plan On Karabakh

US DIPLOMAT UPBEAT ON LATEST PEACE PLAN ON KARABAKH

Day.Az
Nov 29 2007
Azerbaijan

A senior US diplomat has called the latest set of principles proposed
by international mediators on Nagornyy Karabakh as the "most logical
formula" to resolve the long-standing conflict between Armenia and
Azerbaijan.

"For today, what is on the negotiation table now is the most logical
formula to resolve the conflict," Matthew Bryza, US deputy assistant
secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, was quoted by
Azerbaijan’s Day.az website as saying. "I think that every person
who has common sense would accept these principles."

The mediators formally presented the principles to the Azerbaijani
and Armenian foreign ministers in Madrid on 29 November. Azerbaijan’s
Foreign Ministry has said that the principles include withdrawal
of Armenian troops from the Azerbaijani territories surrounding
Nagornyy Karabakh, return of refugees to their homes and restoration
of communications between the conflicting sides, among others.

Turan news agency quoted the ministry spokesman, Xazar Ibrahim, as
saying that the sides had failed to agree only one of the proposed
principles, which he did not specify.

Speaking to Day.az, Bryza said that the proposals were the "most
rational" ones made in the past 10-15 years. He added that the
mediators were now waiting for response from the Azerbaijani and
Armenian presidents.

"We have made the best proposals for compromises, and now are
looking forward to hear from the presidents. But this is not a new
initiative. This is the end of the initiatives. And now, as I said,
we are waiting for response from the heads of states," Bryza was
quoted as saying.

Lecture about the Folk Tradition of Musa dagh

PRESS RELEASE
ARPA Institute
18106 Miranda St. Tarzana, CA 91356
Contact: Hagop Panossian
Tel: (818) 586-9660
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

ARPA Institute presents the Lecture/Seminar: `The Folk Tradition of
Musa Dagh"," by Mrs. Sona Zeitlian, on Thursday, December 6, 2007 at
7:30 PM at the Merdinian School auditorium.

The Address is 13330 Riverside Dr., Sherman Oaks, CA 91403.
Directions: on the 101 FWY exit on Woodman, go north and turn right on
Riverside Dr.

Abstract: The folk tradition or the orally transmitted stories
engender a strong connection that links the generations. Those
folktales are vehicles of age-old manners, customs and folk wisdom. As
such, they are instruments for asserting cultural identity, based on
shared experiences and values. The oral tradition has been central to
the lives of Musa Daghtsis as a form of popular entertainment during
festivals and especially as a means to while away the long winter
nights. Its importance has waned as the living conditions have changed
after the relocation of Musa Daghtsis to Anjar, Lebanon and
Armenia. The heroes of the Musa Dagh folktales are mostly kings,
princes, princesses, traders and peasant men and women. The virtues of
the folk hero integrate physical aptitude with a dedication to
justice, integrity and audacity, as well as a merciful attitude,
modesty, hard work, honest gain and patience. The hero seeks freedom
and proudly endures hardships for the sake of boldly asserting his
independence of thought and action. The heroines of the tales have the
defining role of either motivating the hero to realize lofty ideals or
letting him sink into the depths of despair. The patient, diligent and
conciliatory heroine overcomes difficulties and always stands by her
husband. She is modest, loyal and rates the family honor as a precious
gift. Motherhood ennobles her, deepens her great capacity for love,
even enables her to make the ultimate sacrifice for her children. Musa
Daghtsis consider such a heroine `the greatest treasure on earth.’

Sona Simonian-Zeitlian was born in Cairo, Egypt. Political turmoil in
the early 60s forced her and her family to leave for Lebanon. Then the
hardships of the Lebanese Civil War and the tragedy of the abduction
of her husband, Sarkis Thomas Zeitlian forced Sona and her four
children to finally settle in California. A graduate of the American
University in Cairo, she has held teaching posts in Cairo and
Beirut. In 1995 she was nominated by the Near Eastern Studies Center
at UCLA to become a member of its Advisory Board. She has also
lectured extensively about social and cultural issues and has been
recognized and awarded for her educational and community service.
Zeitlian’s first major work was The Role of Women in the Armenian
Revolutionary Movement which won the Kevork Melidinetsi prize
presented annually by the Catholicosate of Cilicia. Then she published
The Folktales of Musa Dagh based on the oral tradition that she
recorded for the first time in Anjar, Lebanon. Two of these folktales,
The One and Only and Grateful Animals have also appeared separately as
bilingual (Armenian/English) illustrated publications.During the 80s,
Sona Zeitlian wrote four volumes about the Armenian national
tradition, namely such legendary heroes as the Patriarchs Haig and
Aram, early princely leaders Ara the Handsome and Dikran Yervantian,
the powerful head of state King Ardashes and the heroic
commanders-in-chief Mushegh Mamigonian and Kyle Vahan.After years of
research of her own roots, the Egyptian-Armenian community, she
published first in Armenian then in 2006, an expanded English edition
of Armenians in Egypt: Contribution to Medieval and Modern Egypt.

For more Information Please call Dr. Hagop Panossian at (818)586-9660

http://www.arpainstitute.org/

RA President Surprised That There Are Pro-Turkish Forces In Armenia

RA PRESIDENT SURPRISED THAT THERE ARE PRO-TURKISH FORCES IN ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
14.11.2007 15:23 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "It was a surprise to learn that there political
forces in Armenia, which think that Turkey and Azerbaijan should
become Armenia’s major strategic partners," RA President Robert
Kocharian told reporters in Yerevan.

"I did not expect such a pro-Turkish grasp even from the Armenian
National Movement. If there are people or parties sharing this opinion,
they can unite and then explain their vision of Armenia’s future,"
the President said, Novosti Armenia reported.

Blame the Jews

=4/b/viii/081120071
Blame the Jews

InfoIsrael
9 November 2007

By Steve Kramer

Once again the Jews are being blamed, this time by the Turks. On 10
October 2007, the 48-member US House Committee on Foreign Affairs
resolved that the Ottoman Empire committed genocide against its
Armenian citizens during WWI (resolution 106). Of the eight Jews (17%
of the membership) on the committee, seven voted for the
resolution. Though the resolution was later tabled, the Jerusalem Post
headlined "Turkey blames American Jews for [the] genocide bill". (24
October) The issue of whether or not genocide against the Armenians
was carried out more than ninety years ago by the defunct Ottoman
Empire is still disputed. This article addresses the need to speak
truth to history as well as the need to face the realpolitik of
survival, as my friend Stephen Schwartz has noted.

It isn’t well known that about 600,000 Muslim Turkish civilians died
as a result of massacres or inhumane conditions during WWI, alongside
the estimated half a million to 1.5 million Christian Armenian
victims. In total, the Ottoman Empire sustained 4 million civilian
deaths, five times more than their total military deaths. For those
who want to delve behind the headlines, there is a huge amount of
pertinent material on this subject on the Internet. Eminent
historians, like Middle East expert Bernard Lewis, characterize the
deaths of the Christian Armenians as a brutal byproduct of war. He
also said, "The reality of the Armenian genocide results from nothing
more than the imagination of the Armenian people." [November 1993, Le
Monde newspaper] On 21 June 1995 a Parisian court interpreted Lewis’
remarks as a denial of the Armenian Genocide and fined him one
franc. (There’s a message there.)

Questioning the validity of an Armenian genocide is not the equivalent
of Holocaust denial. The Holocaust happened to be the first modern
genocide, authenticated by eye witness accounts, documents, pictures,
films and millions of survivors’ statements. But there were numerous
other genocides which preceded it. For example, estimates of the
genocide of the native inhabitants of the Congo at the end of the 19th
century, perpetrated by King Leopold of Belgium, range from 3 million
dead to ten times that figure.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has not vowed to right this
undisputed, grievous wrong against Africans. So, why did the Speaker
of the House vow to bring this controversial issue to the full House
for a vote? Given the huge amount of material on both sides of the
issue, disputing the veracity of the "Armenian genocide" is nothing
like Holocaust denial. Since the Ottoman Empire ceased to exist ninety
years ago, there are no living perpetrators to be punished. The
resolution, even if it had been passed by Congress, would have had
little effect on anyone. Did Nancy Pelosi have something personal to
gain from pursuing this particular issue?

Undoubtedly, the committee’s vote has muddied the waters between
America and Turkey, which is a vital ally for America in both NATO and
the war in Iraq. The vote has also soured relations between Israel and
its crucial and only Muslim ally, Turkey. (Egypt and Jordan are
certainly not allies of Israel.) I believe some overzealous Jews in
America have blundered, trading a probably meaningless resolution for
a worsened partnership between important allies.

You might think that I’m borrowing a page from the notorious
professors Walt and Mearsheimer, whose thesis in The Jewish Lobby is
that a monolithic Jewish lobby "has a far-reaching impact on America’s
posture throughout the Middle East – in Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, and
toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – and the policies it has
encouraged are in neither America’s national interest nor Israel’s
long-term interest. The lobby’s influence also affects America’s
relationship with important allies and increases dangers that all
states face from global jihadist terror." [from the Publishers Weekly
review at Amazon.com].

On the contrary. I certainly don’t agree that

by that is hurting America and Israel’s interests. My contention is
simply that American Jews can’t celebrate their disproportionate clout
in academia, the sciences, entertainment and politics without
considering that what American Jews think, write about and do is very
significant and reverberates around the world.

The recent kerfuffle in Boston over the subject of Armenian genocide
is an example of the "blame the Jews" syndrome at work. The New
England chapter of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) reacted to
pressure from the strong Armenian lobby in the Boston metropolitan
area and distanced itself from the national ADL posture, which was to
remain noncommittal on the issue. Following much adverse publicity
concerning the firing of the New England regional director Andrew
H. Tarcy, ADL head Abraham Foxman reinstated him and officially
acknowledged the genocide of Armenians at the hands of Ottoman Turks.

Soon after, it was reported that "Senior Israeli and American Jewish
officials went out of their way to restate Jerusalem’s long-held view
that the historical dispute should be resolved between Turkey and
Armenia, a position shared by Washington as well as most major
American Jewish organizations. The ADL itself tried to calm tensions
by issuing a statement opposing a congressional resolution recognizing
that a genocide took place and by sending a letter to Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan expressing ‘deep regret’ and the desire
to ‘deepen our friendship.” [Jewish Daily Forward, 29 August]

Jews in America are a force to be reckoned with despite their low
numbers. Jews are about 2% of the population, but 13% of the Senate
and 7% of the House are Jewish. Jewish voters are targeted in large
urban states by Democrats and Republicans. We all know that there are
numerous Jewish academics, scientists, economists, entrepreneurs,
writers and media personalities (on stage and behind the
scenes). Naturally, Jews like to bask in the glow of their
accomplishments. Equally, they must consider the consequences of
taking sides in questionable disputes that may have negative
consequences for America and/or Israel.

Despite the efforts of the leaders of most American Jewish
organizations, who understand what’s at stake for Israel vis a vis
Turkey, some damage has been done. A group of well-intentioned
American Jews have ignored realpolitik and succumbed to their liberal
tendency to "right wrongs". In this case, resolution 106 is tabled and
is therefore legally meaningless. Nevertheless, it has set the Turkish
government and the Turkish people against Israel for "legitimizing"
the genocide claims against Turks. American Jews need to use their
influence in a more sophisticated, calculating way than in this
instance. Sometimes it’s better to leave well enough alone.

Source: Article submitted by the author
Article to be posted in the S.J.J.T., 9 November 2007
Edited by IHC staff,
Published 8 November 2007

http://www.infoisrael.net/cgi-local/text.pl?source
www.infoisrael.net

Lebanon Retains Christian-Muslim Power Sharing

LEBANON RETAINS CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM POWER SHARING
Renee Montagne

NPR
November 9, 2007

(Because of intense interest in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,
NPR makes available free transcripts of its coverage. View related
web coverage or listen to the audio for this story)

During Lebanon’s wars stretching back to the 1970s, waves of
Lebanese fled their country, many of them heading to the United
States. And that’s affected all of Lebanon’s often-feuding religious
groups. Christians used to represent about one half of Lebanon’s
population. Now Christians are an ever smaller minority, but they
still have as much political power as the growing Muslim majority.

The most visible sign of Christian power is the presidency. It’s
always held by a member of Lebanon’s unique Maronite Christian
community. As parliament struggles to meet a deadline this month to
select a new president, Christians and many Muslims support keeping
the old outdated power-sharing arrangement.

NPR’s Peter Kenyon reports from Beirut in this final installment of
a three-part series on the Christians of Lebanon.

PETER KENYON: In Lebanon these days, it seems there are some questions
people would rather not know the answer to. For example, how many
Christians are living in Lebanon today, or for that matter, how many
Sunni or Shiite Muslims? In many countries, this would be basic public
information, but here there hasn’t been an official census since 1932.

One man who studies the issue carefully is Jawad Adra, a research
consultant and managing partner of Information International in
Beirut. One of his recent surveys found 30 percent of Lebanese
youth responding that they would like to leave Lebanon. Those numbers
represent people of all religions, but because of their low birth rate
and other factors, Christians are feeling the impact of emigration
more severely than Muslims.

Adra says Lebanon’s studied silence about its population isn’t
surprising when you consider the political pressures that might come
into play if the census were conducted.

Mr. JAWAD ADRA (Research Consultant): Because Lebanon, when it
was first established in the 1920s, it was really established as a
Christian, particularly Maronite faith. This was the raison d’être
of Lebanon. So they all had some kind of an agreement that Lebanon
is Christian. The Muslims agreed and went along with this. And they
all said, okay, let’s not find out.

KENYON: Even without official numbers, though, Adra says the trends are
clear for anyone who cares to find out. Barring some major unforeseen
demographic shift, Adra says Christians, who were the majority here
for much of the last century, may well become a tiny minority before
the next century begins.

Mr. ADRA: We did a study which shows that perhaps 75 years from now
there will be almost maybe six percent Marionite left in Lebanon,
because they are an aging community. You know, when you look at the
fertility rate and so on, you will find out that it is higher among
the Sunni and the Shiite than it is among the Christians.

KENYON: In other words, the gap between the Muslim and Christian
populations in Lebanon will not only grow, it will accelerate over
time.

Mr. JEROME SHAHIN(ph) (Economist): (Through translator) We are at
the moment at a very, very difficult stage; in fact, one of the worst
stages in history that we’ve been.

KENYON: For economist Jerome Shahin, who’s been studying demographic
issues for some 20 years, the coming domination of Lebanon’s population
by Muslims raises troubling questions, the primary one being can
Lebanon’s unique power-sharing political arrangement survive?

Mr. SHAHIN: (Through translator) Lebanon, in fact, is the only
country in the Arab world where the Christians and the Muslims are
approximately equal.

So it’s a laboratory for coexistence for the rest of the Arab world.

KENYON: Professor Samir Khalaf at the American University in Beirut
says while disputes in Lebanon tend to be over power and influence, not
theology, there is an atmosphere of unease among Lebanese Christians
today as they watch the increasing Islamification of the Arab world
around them.

Dr. SAMIR KHALAF (American University, Beirut): And they look around
and they see what has happened to Copts in Egypt, what happened to
Armenians in Turkey, what is happening to Christians in Palestine,
and Christians in Syria, and Christians in Iraq. And the numbers are
staggering. And essentially they say, you know, are we next?

KENYON: Historian Kamal Salibi says the genius of Lebanon’s awkward,
maddening and frequently dysfunctional system of government is that
it compels Lebanon’s 18 confessions to cooperate, enforcing that
cooperation by simply collapsing whenever one side grows too powerful.

In that light, Salibi says, it’s clear that Lebanese Christians are
needed not because they have some special gift for coexistence; there’s
more than enough blood on Christian hands to debunk that myth. It’s
just that they have to play their political role, whether or not
their population justifies it, to keep the system clattering along.

Mr. KAMAL SALIBI (Historian): It’s not that the Christians are bastions
of freedom. What’s important about the Christians is simply their
presence; their presence, real or imagined, will serve the purpose,
to hearten other people in Lebanon who want to lead a civic, secular
life. So for this reason you find the Muslims in Lebanon running
after the Christians, begging them not to emigrate.

KENYON: There are many Muslims, however, who don’t feel any special
need to maintain the polite fiction that Christians are half
the population. The Shiite community, for instance, has long felt
undervalued in Lebanon, even though unofficial estimates suggest the
Shiites are the largest single group in the country.

In the cool, leafy hills of Mount Lebanon, Greek Catholic Bishop
George Khodr offers another caution. Lebanon’s Christians shouldn’t
expect foreign benefactors to come rushing in to save them as they
did in earlier centuries.

These days, he says, the need for petroleum tends to overwhelm issues
such as human rights or religious freedom.

Bishop GEORGE KHODR (Greek Catholic): (Unintelligible) in politics
(unintelligible) Muslim.

(Soundbite of prayer)

KENYON: But with Lebanon facing its latest political crisis, a
standoff over naming a new president with a November deadline looming,
a number of Muslim clerics recently made the trip up into the hills
above the capital to show solidarity with Maronite Christians. The
Muslims prayed in one room at the main Maronite Church complex while
the Christian service went on upstairs.

(Soundbite of service)

KENYON: Afterwards, Ibrahim Shamseddine, the son of a highly respected
Shiite cleric, agreed that the event was largely symbolic, but added
that in some ways Lebanon itself is symbolic – an example to other
Arab states of the possibility of Christian and Muslim coexistence
that should not be allowed to fade from the scene.

Mr. IBRAHIM SHAMSEDDINE: Believe me, I assure you, I assure everybody,
on a very Machiavellian basis even, put religion apart. It’s for our
sake and benefit as Muslims to have the Christians here, strong as
partner, as decision makers with us. We build together. We lose and
win together. We live together. We raise our children together. This is
not just poetry; this is real fact of life. This is the way it should
be, and this is the way we’re going to work to have it maintained in
this way.

KENYON: These voices are not often heard in Beirut these days. They’re
drowned out by the politicians and foreign envoys pressing for
advantage as the current presidential crisis comes to a head. But for
many Lebanese the name of the next president is less important than
knowing if their country will remain that rare thing in the modern
Arab world, a place where Christians and Muslims govern together.

Peter Kenyon, NPR News, Beirut.

MONTAGNE: And you can hear the first two parts of this series on
Christians in Lebanon at npr.org.

–Boundary_(ID_YXbui6BeYYFm/2Y6md52UQ)–

No Differences Between Russia, US Within OSCE Minsk Group – Russian

NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RUSSIA, US WITHIN OSCE MINSK GROUP – RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY

"Trend" news agency
08.11.07 18:55

Russia, Moscow / Тrend corr R. Agayev / There are no difference
between Russia and the United States within the framework of the OSCE
Minsk Group, a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry said
at a press conference dedicated to the prospects of relationships
between Russia and the United States in Moscow on 8 November. He
preferred to keep anonymity.

"We believe the OSCE Minks Group is a very useful mechanism and there
are no deep differences between Russia and the United States," he said.

According to the Russian diplomat, it has been repeatedly said that
settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is a priority both for
Russia and the United States. "When the Minks Group met in Florida
we were on the verge of a break-throw," he said.

The main thing for the time being is to promote creation of political
conditions for concrete steps in the settlement. Russia considers
direct contacts between Azerbaijani and Armenian administration are
necessary for this purpose. "But it is quite true that presently
the Minsk Group is completely inactive. It requires some impetus,
also from the two conflicting sides," he said.

–Boundary_(ID_vYgxRZRNTWL2TQ4GG/K7mg)–