Foreign Ministers Of Armenia And Switzerland Discuss Topical Issues

FOREIGN MINISTERS OF ARMENIA AND SWITZERLAND DISCUSS TOPICAL ISSUES OF BILATERAL COOPERATION

ArmInfo
2009-11-11 12:05:00

ArmInfo. Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Switzerland Edward Nalbandyan
and Micheline Calmy-Rey met in Berne on November 10.

As Armenia’s Foreign Ministry press service reports, the two foreign
ministers discussed a number of issues of cooperation in different
spheres, as well as a number of regional and international issues.

The parties noted with satisfaction that the relations between the two
countries experienced an unprecedented development over the last year,
that is indicated by the meeting of Presidents Serzh Sargsyan and
Hans-Rudolf Merz, a score of negotiations between foreign ministers
and Switzerland’s mediation in the process of normalization of the
Armenian-Turkish relations. Development of relations was also marked by
appointment of Charles Aznavour Ambassador of Armenia to Switzerland,
as well as by establishment of the Swiss diplomatic representation
in Yerevan.

The foreign ministers highly appreciated the dynamics of development
of relations, as well as emphasized the importance of organizing
high-level visits and extension of the contract-legal base. The
parties noted the efficient cooperation between the two Foreign
Ministries and agreed to hold periodical consultations. They also
discussed an opportunity of extending the cooperation within the
frames of international organizations. In the context of the upcoming
chairmanship of Switzerland in CE, the parties exchanged opinions on
the issues of the agenda, as well as on a number of practical tasks.

The two foreign ministers agreed to take steps for stimulation of
the trade-economic relations and emphasized the importance of the
initiatives by business- circles.

Having touched on the process of normalization of the Armenian-Turkish
relations, E. Nalbandyan thanked Switzerland for its mediation.

According to him, Switzerland assumed a mission which simultaneously
requires will, restraint, imagination, carefulness and patience,
and it honourably fulfilled that mission. The parties also discussed
the issues of the South Caucasus region.

A number of documents were also signed within the frames of the visit.

In particular, the foreign ministers of Armenia and Switzerland
signed an Agreement between the two country governments on regular
air communication and an Agreement on cancellation of a requirement of
entry visas available for the persons with diplomatic passports. The
two foreign ministers gave a joint press-conference after the document
signing ceremony.

Parliamentary Hearings On Amendments And Addenda To Environmental La

PARLIAMENTARY HEARINGS ON AMENDMENTS AND ADDENDA TO ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 11

Noyan Tapan
Nov 10, 2009

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 10, NOYAN TAPAN. On November 11, the RA National
Assembly Standing Committee on Agricultural and Environmental Affairs
organizes parliamentary hearings on RA bills On Making Amendments
and Addenda to the RA Law On Environmental Control, to RA Code On
Exercising Self-Control to Requirements of Ecological Legislation
and On Administrative Offences. NT was informed about it by the RA
NA Press Service.

Peter Semneby: In Prospects The Ratification Of Turkey-Armenia Proto

PETER SEMNEBY: IN PROSPECTS THE RATIFICATION OF TURKEY-ARMENIA PROTOCOLS MEETS AZERBAIJAN’S INTERESTS, TOO

APA
Nov 10 2009
Azerbaijan

Baku – APA. "Today, Armenia-Turkey relations are on the verge of
breakthrough," EU Special Representative for South Caucasus Peter
Semneby said in his interview to the Kommersant, APA reports.

According to him, it is good that the relations between the two
countries have gotten off the ground. Semneby said opening of
Turkey-Armenia border may be the first step in dealing with abnormal
situation.

"The situation, when three regional borders – Armenia-Turkey,
Azerbaijan-Armenia and Russia-Georgia borders are closed, is abnormal.

It impedes the normal development of the region. The process of
the ratification of the protocols is very complex, but it meets the
interests of both countries. I am sure that in prospects it meets the
interests of Azerbaijan, too, as this country is also interested in
the opening of the borders in the region. The war in Georgia revealed
vulnerability of the South Caucasian countries. This vulnerability
may be eliminated through solution to these problems. I am sure
that Armenian leadership also thinks so. Present status-quo of
Nagorno-Karabakh is not in Armenia’s interests, it cannot last
forever. To reach all these goals mutual confidence should be
strengthened in the Caucasus. The third parties, like Russia and the
European Union, should demonstrate activeness. I hope together we
will ensure dialogue," he said.

Eastern Partnership Shouldn’t Be Used As Platform For Discussion Of

EASTERN PARTNERSHIP SHOULDN’T BE USED AS PLATFORM FOR DISCUSSION OF CONFLICTS

PanARMENIAN.Net
10.11.2009 14:02 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ RA Deputy Foreign Minister Karine Ghazinyan met
with the Secretary General of the European Movement International,
Mr. Diogo Pinto to exchange views on the Eastern Partnership,
normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations and a number of regional
and international issues.

"The Eastern Partnership will allow Armenia get closer to the European
family but it should not be used as a platform for discussion of
conflicts," Ms. Ghazinyan said, RA MFA press office reported.

The Evil Empire

THE EVIL EMPIRE
By Paul Craig Roberts

09.html
November 6-8, 2009

The US government is now so totally under the thumbs of organized
interest groups that "our" government can no longer respond to the
concerns of the American people who elect the president and the
members of the House and Senate. Voters will vent their frustrations
over their impotence on the president, which implies a future of
one-term presidents. Soon our presidents will be as ineffective as
Roman emperors in the final days of that empire.

Obama is already set on the course to a one-term presidency. He
promised change, but has delivered none. His health care bill is held
hostage by the private insurance companies seeking greater profits.

The most likely outcome will be cuts in Medicare and Medicaid in
order to help fund wars that enrich the military/security complex
and the many companies created by privatizing services that the
military once provided for itself at far lower costs. It would be
interesting to know the percentage of the $700+ billion "defense"
spending that goes to private companies. In American "capitalism,"
an amazing amount of taxpayers’ earnings go to private firms via the
government. Yet, Republicans scream about "socializing" health care.

Republicans and Democrats saw opportunities to create new sources
of campaign contributions by privatizing as many military functions
as possible. There are now a large number of private companies that
have never made a dollar in the market, feeding instead at the public
trough that drains taxpayers of dollars while loading Americans with
debt service obligations.

Obama inherited an excellent opportunity to bring US soldiers home
from the Bush regime’s illegal wars of aggression. In its final days,
the Bush regime realized that it could "win" in Iraq by putting the
Sunni insurgents on the US military payroll. Once Bush had 80,000
insurgents collecting US military pay, violence, although still high,
dropped in half. All Obama had to do was to declare victory and bring
our boys home, thanking Bush for winning the war. It would have shut
up the Republicans.

But this sensible course would have impaired the profits and
share prices of those firms that comprise the military/security
complex. So instead of doing what Obama said he would do and what
the voters elected him to do, Obama restarted the war in Afghanistan
and launched a new one in Pakistan. Soon Obama was echoing Bush and
Cheney’s threats to attack Iran.

In place of health care for Americans, there will be more profits
for private insurance companies.

In place of peace there will be more war.

Voters are already recognizing the writing on the wall and are falling
away from Obama and the Democrats. Independents who gave Obama his
comfortable victory have now swung against him, recently electing
Republican governors in New Jersey and Virginia to succeed Democrats.

This is a protest vote, not a confidence vote in Republicans.

Obama’s credibility is shot. And so is Congress’s, assuming it ever
had any. The US House of Representatives has just voted to show
the entire world that the US House of Representatives is nothing
but the servile, venal, puppet of the Israel Lobby. The House of
Representatives of the American "superpower" did the bidding of its
master, AIPAC, and voted 344 to 36 to condemn the Goldstone Report.

In case you don’t know, the Goldstone Report is the Report of the
United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict. The "Gaza
Conflict" is the Israeli military attack on the Gaza ghetto, where 1.5
million dispossessed Palestinians, whose lands, villages, and homes
were stolen by Israel, are housed. The attack was on civilians and
civilian infrastructure. It was without any doubt a war crime under the
Nuremberg standard that the US established in order to execute Nazis.

Goldstone is not only a very distinguished Jewish jurist who has given
his life to bringing people to accountability for their crimes against
humanity, but also a Zionist. However, the Israelis have demonized
him as a "self-hating Jew" because he wrote the truth instead of
Israeli propaganda.

US Representative Dennis Kucinich, who is now without a doubt a marked
man on AIPAC’s political extermination list, asked the House if the
members had any realization of the shame that the vote condemning
Goldstone would bring on the House and the US government. The entire
rest of the world accepts the Goldstone report.

The House answered with its lopsided vote that the rest of the world
doesn’t count as it doesn’t give campaign contributions to members
of Congress.

This shameful, servile act of "the world’s greatest democracy"
occurred the very week that a court in Italy convicted 23 US CIA
officers for kidnapping a person in Italy. The CIA agents are now
considered "fugitives from justice" in Italy, and indeed they are.

The kidnapped person was renditioned to the American puppet state of
Egypt, where the victim was held for years and repeatedly tortured.

The case against him was so absurd that even an Egyptian judge ordered
his release.

One of the convicted CIA operatives, Sabrina deSousa, an attractive
young woman, says that the US broke the law by kidnapping a person and
sending him to another country to be tortured in order to manufacture
another "terrorist" in order to keep the terrorist hoax going at home.

Without the terrorist hoax, America’s wars for special interest
reasons would become transparent even to Fox "News" junkies.

Ms. deSousa says that "everything I did was approved back in
Washington," yet the government, which continually berates us to
"support the troops," did nothing to protect her when she carried
out the Bush regime’s illegal orders.

Clearly, this means that the crime that Bush, Cheney, the Pentagon, and
the CIA ordered is too heinous and beyond the pale to be justified,
even by memos from the despicable John Yoo and the Republican
Federalist Society.

Ms. deSousa is clearly worried about herself. But where is her concern
for the innocent person that she sent into an Egyptian hell to be
tortured until death or admission of being a terrorist? The remorse
deSousa expresses is only for herself. She did her evil government’s
bidding and her evil government that she so faithfully served turned
its back on her. She has no remorse for the evil she committed against
an innocent person.

Perhaps deSousa and her 22 colleagues grew up on video games. It was
great fun to plot to kidnap a real person and fly him on a CIA plane
to Egypt. Was it like a fisherman catching a fish or a deer hunter
killing a beautiful 8-point buck? Clearly, they got their jollies at
the expense of their renditioned victim.

The finding of the Italian court, and keep in mind that Italy is a
bought-and-paid-for US puppet state, indicates that even our bought
puppets are finding the US too much to stomach.

Moving from the tip of the iceberg down, we have Ambassador Craig
Murray, rector of the University of Dundee and until 2004 the
UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan, which he describes as a Stalinist
totalitarian state courted and supported by the Americans.

As ambassador, Murray saw the MI5 intelligence reports from the CIA
that described the most horrible torture procedures. "People were
raped with broken bottles, children were tortured in front of their
parents until they [the parents] signed a confession, people were
boiled alive."

"Intelligence" from these torture sessions was passed on by the CIA
to MI5 and to Washington as proof of the vast al Qaeda conspiracy.

Amb. Murray reports that the people delivered by CIA flights to
Uzbekistan’s torture prisons "were told to confess to membership in
Al Qaeda. They were told to confess they’d been in training camps in
Afghanistan. They were told to confess they had met Osama bin Laden
in person. And the CIA intelligence constantly echoed these themes."

"I was absolutely stunned," says the British ambassador, who thought
that he served a moral country that, along with its American ally,
had moral integrity. The great Anglo-American bastion of democracy and
human rights, the homes of the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights, the
great moral democracies that defeated Nazism and stood up to Stalin’s
gulags, were prepared to commit any crime in order to maximize profits.

Amb. Murray learned too much and was fired when he vomited it all up.

He saw the documents that proved that the motivation for US and UK
military aggression in Afghanistan had to do with the natural gas
deposits in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. The Americans wanted a
pipeline that bypassed Russia and Iran and went through Afghanistan.

To insure this, an invasion was necessary. The idiot American public
could be told that the invasion was necessary because of 9/11 and to
save them from "terrorism," and the utter fools would believe the lie.

"If you look at the deployment of US forces in Afghanistan, as
against other NATO country forces in Afghanistan, you’ll see that
undoubtedly the US forces are positioned to guard the pipeline
route. It’s what it’s about. It’s about money, its about energy,
it’s not about democracy."

Guess who the consultant was who arranged with then Texas governor
George W. Bush the agreements that would give to Enron the rights to
Uzbekistan’s and Turkmenistan’s natural gas deposits and to Unocal to
develop the trans-Afghanistan pipeline. It was Karzai, the US-imposed
"president" of Afghanistan, who has no support in the country except
for American bayonets.

Amb. Murray was dismissed from the UK Foreign Service for his
revelations. No doubt on orders from Washington to our British puppet.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in
the Reagan administration. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good
Intentions.He can be reached at: [email protected]

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts110620

Govm’t to monitor spending of funds for building homeless housing

Government to monitor spending of funds directed at building housing
for homeless families in disaster zone

YEREVAN, November 7, /ARKA/. Armenian urban planning minister Vardan
Vardanian said today the government will conduct a monitoring of funds
directed for building housing for families that lost their homes in
the 1988 December 7 earthquake.

Speaking to journalists he said the monitoring will permit the
government to control utilization of funds released for improvement of
housing conditions of homeless families.

?Conduction of the monitoring will also allow us to create a unified
database about how the government is respecting its promises to
provide homeless families with housing,? he said.

The 2010 draft budget of Armenian government has earmarked 24 billion
Drams for rehabilitation of housing in the earthquake zone.

The 1988 December 7 earthquake razed to ground northern parts of
Armenia, destroying Spitak and Leninakan (now Gyumri) and over 100
villages, killing, according to official figures, 25,000 people,
injuring 140,000 and leaving over half a million people without homes.
M.M. -0-

Taner Akcam lectures on the Armenian Genocide at La Salle University

Taner Akcam lectures on the Armenian Genocide at La Salle University

LOS ANGELES, NOVEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. Before a
standing-room only audience at La Salle University (Philadelphia),
Taner Akcam, the first scholar of Turkish origin to publish on the
heretofore-taboo topic of the Armenian Genocide, explained the
historical background and causes of the genocide.

Dr. Cornelia Tsakiridou, an associate professor of philosophy at the
university, explained that the idea of bringing Dr. Akcam there was to
expose students to the historical arguments of the case and do so by
inviting a prominent historian who has specialized on this subject.

Akcam is an associate professor of history at Clark University in
Worcester, Mass. Since 1990, he has focused his research on Turkish
nationalism and the Armenian Genocide, with 11 books and numerous
articles to his credit, starting with his first book, Turk Ulusal
Kimligi ve Ermeni Sorunu (The Armenian Question and Turkish National
Identity), published in 1992.

Ulysses’ coach: We must prepare for the European League championship

Ulysses’ coach: We must prepare for the European League championship in 2010
07.11.2009 19:13 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Head coach of the Ulysses football club Sevada
Arzoumanyan said that they played with a positive attitude. " "Today’s
game was very important for us because we wanted to finish the
championship with a victory. Championship was successful,’ Sevada
Arzoumanyan said.

According to him, Ulysses’ players after several weeks start preparing
for the next year tournament. Ulysses will play in the European League
championship for the firts time, we must prepare well, " Sevada
Arzoumanyan said.

AGBU Europe Calls on UK to Recognize the Armenian Genocide

AGBU Europe
c/o AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x118
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:

PRESS RELEASE

Friday, November 6, 2009

AGBU Europe Calls on UK to Recognize the Armenian Genocide

Brussels — Today AGBU Europe called upon the government of the United
Kingdom to rescind its established policy of denying the Armenian
Genocide and initiate a more ethical and constructive policy towards
Turkey and Armenia by acknowledging the 1915 genocide and its
consequences in order to build confidence and contribute to security in
the region.

The call follows the publication of a legal opinion by Geoffrey
Robertson QC, an authority of matters on international criminal law, on
the British government’s long-held policy of considering that there is
"insufficient evidence" to consider the 1915 mass slaughter of the
Armenians in Turkey as genocide. The United Kingdom is the only
government in Europe that effectively denies the Armenian genocide.

Based on a thorough investigation of the written confidential/secret
internal documents obtained under Freedom of Information Act (FIA) from
the Foreign and Commonwealth Office since 1997, the Opinion concludes
that the "advice [upon which the government’s opinion is based] reflects
neither the law on genocide, nor the demonstrable facts of the massacres
in 1915-1916, and has been calculated to mislead Parliament into
believing that there has been an assessment of evidence and an exercise
of judgment on that evidence".

In fact, internal FCO documents make it abundantly clear, according to
Mr. Robertson’s analysis, that the British government’s position was
adopted exclusively to placate its ally Turkey and that the UK’s stance
is, as the FCO diplomats themselves put it, "open to criticism in terms
of its ethical dimension".

The legal opinion published on Tuesday also refers to the agreement
signed on October 10 between the Presidents of Turkey and Armenia to
establish relations, which it terms a "welcome development" but warns
that debate among historians about the Armenian genocide would be a
"pointless exercise" and that the matter cannot be suitably addressed
with Turkey as long as article 301 of its criminal code, which restricts
public debate on such matters as the Armenian Genocide, remains in
force.

AGBU Europe believes that the British policy of pandering to Turkey’s
Armenian Genocide denial is not only unethical but also ineffective and
short-sighted. The UK can play a role in promoting trust and stability
between neighbors in the South Caucasus and in Turkey, but their policy
must be based on the values and standards they would apply to fellow
European nations.

Said Armine Afrikian, Member of the board of AGBU Europe for the UK: "I
truly hope that our government will do the right thing this time. It
troubles me that Britain should still refuse to acknowledge the basic
facts which the UK was the first to denounce at the time".

In particular, the UK must support the forces of democracy and tolerance
in Turkey. Earlier this year, for example, a group of Turkish
intellectuals took the unprecedented step of issuing a public apology
for the World War I extermination of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire,
even though they avoided using the word genocide, perhaps understandably
under 301, which nevertheless helped to challenge the taboo about the
Genocide in Turkey; in the face of such a bold public collective move,
the Ministry of Justice took the equally unprecedented decision not to
prosecute the initiators of the petition.

Genocide denial, by contrast, further casts doubt on Turkey’s
questionable reputation, delays the transformation and modernisation of
its society and institutions and feeds tensions and distrust between
neighbours. The 2007 assassination of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant
Dink and the justice system’s dismal management of the prosecution of
his murderers, for instance, have severely tarnished Turkey’s reputation
abroad, particularly among the European public and decision-makers.

The Mr. Robertson QC’s Legal Opinion concludes by regretting that "there
is no recognition at all [on the part of the British government] of the
importance of nations acknowledging Genocide and their past crimes
against humanity or of supporting the descendants of victims who still,
almost a century later, have to live with the consequences", suggesting
that the contemporary relevance of the recognition of a past crime is
self-evident to a prominent expert in international justice.

The outcome of the struggle between the forces of tolerance and
democracy in Turkey and those who oppose them is by no means a foregone
conclusion. As one of Turkey’s closest partners and advocates, the UK is
ideally placed to help the country overcome its Armenian Genocide taboo.
In doing so, the UK can furthermore continue to pursue its own long-term
interests with Turkey and stay true to its values.

The Legal Opinion was drafted by Geoffrey Robertson QC, for Doughty
Street Chambers.
It was commissioned by the Armenian Centre, London.
The report can be downloaded at:
For further information, please email [email protected]
AGBU Europe: [email protected], tel: 00 33 1 45 20 03 18

AGBU Europe is the European branch of the Armenian General Benevolent
Union (AGBU). Established in 1906, AGBU () is the world’s
largest non-profit Armenian organization and touches the lives of some
400,000 Armenians worldwide. AGBU Europe coordinates and develops the
pan-European activities of the organization; it preserves and promotes
the Armenian identity and heritage through programmes in the fields of
education, leadership training, cultural heritage, humanitarian and EU
public affairs.

Background
The Armenian Genocide and relations between Turkey and Armenia

Armenians represented a substantial minority in the Ottoman Empire, of
roughly 2 million people, both in their historic homeland and in the
Empire’s major cities. They played an important part in the Empire’s
economy as well as in its intellectual and artistic life and in the
professions. In 1915, the Young Turk government of the Ottoman Empire,
fearing foreign interference in Armenia, initiated the extermination of
the Armenian population of the Empire, which led to the death of an
estimated 1.5 million ethnic Armenians. After the establishment of the
Turkish Republic in 1923, a policy of denial of the Armenian Genocide
was established and accompanied by a sustained effort to remove all
trace of Armenian presence.

Thousands of buildings were destroyed, place names were changed and
public reference to Armenians became a taboo. Across the world, the
survivors of the slaughter were increasingly confronted with the efforts
of Turkish diplomats to prevent them from commemorating and sharing
their story, a policy which continues to this day.

Since 1993, Turkey has maintained a blockade of Armenia in an attempt to
pressure the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh to surrender to the Azeri
forces and to stop the campaign for the recognition of the Armenian
genocide across the world. This policy was inspired by "Turkic"
solidarity between Azeris and Turks against Armenians. It produced no
result because it was premised on the idea that the Republic of Armenia
should control the actions of all ethnic Armenians, whether in Karabakh
resisting Azeri special forces or lobbying for genocide recognition in
the Diaspora.

http://www.doughtystreet.co.uk
www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org
www.agbueurope.org

BAKU: Azerbaijan Reports To U.S. About Legal Aspects Of Armenian-Aze

AZERBAIJAN REPORTS TO U.S. ABOUT LEGAL ASPECTS OF ARMENIAN-AZERBAIJANI CONFLICT

APA
Nov 6 2009
Azerbaijan

Washington – APA. U.S. law experts learned the reports about the
legal aspects of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

Within the framework of 11th Azerbaijan-U.S. security dialogue in
Washington, Azerbaijan submitted a report describing legal aspects
of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno Karabakh conflict to the United
States, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan Araz Azimov
said at a briefing at the U.S. National Press Center, APA reports
quoting Azertac news agency.

Azerbaijan-U.S. security dialogue launched in 1996 is contributing as
a framework mechanism in the determination of directions of defense
and security cooperation between the sides. Azerbaijani deputy
foreign minister Araz Azimov and U.S. Deputy Secretary of State for
political and military affairs Andrew Shapiro co-chaired the next
round of the dialogue in Washington, where they discussed prevention
of proliferation of the weapons of mass destruction, drug trafficking
in the region, war on terror, strengthening of security in the Caspian
basin, U.S. interests in the region and other issues, as well as ways
of extension of the bilateral cooperation opportunities in this sphere.

The deputy minister said law experts in Washington learned the report
prepared by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs about the legal aspects
of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. They unanimously supported the
settlement of the conflict on the basis of the principle of territorial
integrity. Azimov noted that the principle of self-determination,
Armenian argument in the negotiations, can not be contradictory
to the principle of territorial integrity. Azerbaijan is ready,
as a concession, to review the status of 50 000 Armenian community
living in the Nagorno Karabakh region within its state borders,
but this process can not be realized without participation of 70 000
Azerbaijani community displaced from the region.

The deputy foreign minister said he was hopeful that the United
States, as the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair, would make more efforts
for the solution to the conflict. "We are living at the time which
requires results for the stability and security of the region".

Azimov recommended to those, who don’t link the opening of the
Turkish-Armenian borders with the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, to
carefully approach the processes in the region.