Deputes UMP marseillais pour un geste d’Ankara sur genocide armenien

Agence France Presse
14 novembre 2004 dimanche 4:35 PM GMT

Des députés UMP marseillais pour un geste d’Ankara sur le génocide arménien

MARSEILLE 14 nov 2004

Des députés UMP de Marseille ont souhaité dimanche, lors d’un
déjeuner privé avec le président Jacques Chirac, que “la Turquie
fasse un geste de reconnaissance du génocide arménien” avant des
négociations sur son entrée dans l’UE, a indiqué à l’AFP le maire UMP
de Marseille Jean-Claude Gaudin.

L’entrée de la Turquie dans l’UE et la Constitution européenne ont
notamment été évoquées au cours de ce déjeuner, au domicile de M.
Gaudin, a précisé le maire. A propos de la question arménienne, le
chef de l’Etat “a dit que la Turquie essaie d’avoir de meilleures
relations diplomatiques avec l’Arménie”, a indiqué M. Gaudin.

Marseille compte la deuxième communauté arménienne de France après
Paris, avec 80.000 membres.

Au même moment à Marseille, la police évacuait une vingtaine de
militants de la cause arménienne aux abords de la bibliothèque
marseillaise de l’Alcazar, que devait inaugurer M. Chirac. Selon la
police, ces militants reprochant au président de la République sa
position sur l’entrée de la Turquie dans l’UE, scandaient “Chirac,
négationniste”.

Cette intervention s’est déroulée sans incident, selon la police.
Mais Patrick Mennucci, vice-président PS du conseil régional de PACA,
qui a assisté à la scène, a déclaré à l’AFP qu'”ils ont été frappés
avec une extrême violence”. Il a déploré cette intervention à l’égard
de “représentants connus d’associations arméniennes de Marseille”.

Auparavant, lors d’un forum avec des jeunes, le président de la
République avait affirmé que l’adhésion éventuelle de la Turquie à
l’Union européenne était “une chance extraordinaire pour l’Europe de
se renforcer”, estimant que “nous sommes tous des enfants de
Byzance”.

M. Chirac a partagé une bouillabaisse au domicile de M. Gaudin, avec
les cinq députés UMP de Marseille, la députée européenne UMP
Dominique Vlasto, ainsi que le secrétaire d’Etat aux Affaires
étrangères Renaud Muselier et l’ancien ministre marseillais de la
Santé Jean-François Mattei.

Estonia’s UN envoy to become new Defense Minister

Estonia’s UN envoy to become new Defense Minister

AP Worldstream
Nov 12, 2004

Estonia’s ambassador to the United Nations, Jaak Joeruut, is set to
become the country’s defense minister, the Reform Party said Friday.

Joeruut, 56, a career diplomat, will take over from Margus Hanson
pending approval of his nomination by President Arnold Ruutel who
will return to the country next week from a state visit to Armenia.

Party spokesmen said the approval was a formality because under a
deal between the coalition government parties, the Defense Ministry
portfolio belongs to the Reform Party.

Hanson said he would resign earlier this week after Estonian security
police began an investigation into theft of his briefcase from his
home while he slept.

The content of the stolen documents wasn’t revealed, but Estonia
recently joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and has 45
troops in Iraq. As a basic principle, the most classified defense
ministry papers can only be taken out of the ministry under the
protection of an armed guard.

Under Estonian law, the punishment for unintentional negligence in
handling state secrets ranges from minor charges to a year in prison
in more severe cases. The intentional negligence of state secrets
could result in a sentence of five years in prison.

La memoria del genocidio armenio

Clarín, Argentina
Nov 9 2004

CUADERNILLO PARA ESCUELAS PORTEÑAS
La memoria del genocidio armenio

Ayer se presentó un cuadernillo sobre el genocidio contra el pueblo
armenio, elaborado para las escuelas porteñas por la Secretaría de
Derechos Humanos en colaboración con el Consejo Nacional Armenio de
Sudamérica.

El cuadernillo El Genocidio Negado tiene contenidos informativos y
documentales y actividades didácticas sobre los hechos ocurridos
entre 1915 y 1923.

En esos años, se asesinó a más de un millón y medio de personas, se
destruyeron monumentos, escuelas, iglesias y se dispersaron en el
exilio cientos de miles de ciudadanos armenios.

Los armenios reclaman el reconocimiento de este genocidio por el
Estado turco y la restitución de las tierras usurpadas.

“Es fundamental promover en nuestros jóvenes y niños hacer memoria de
aquellos actos que han atentado contra el ser humano para poder
analizarlos, evaluarlos y prevenir actos similares en el futuro” dice
el cuadernillo.

La idea anunciada es difundir hechos históricos y promover “la
solidaridad y el respeto mutuo desde una perspectiva intercultural
como bases necesarias para la convivencia”.

–Boundary_(ID_Tv01tWEr7ZINb/px4FdA1A)–

=?UNKNOWN?Q?Gr=E8ve_de_la?= faim de Kurdes =?UNKNOWN?Q?d=27Arm=E9nie

Grève de la faim de Kurdes d’Arménie contre la détention d’Ocalan

Agence France Presse
10 novembre 2004 mercredi 2:40 PM GMT

EREVAN 10 nov

25 militants du Comité arménien “Kurdistan” ont annoncé mercredi
avoir entamé une grève de la faim de trois jours pour exiger
l’amélioration des conditions de détention du chef rebelle kurde
Abdullah Ocalan, qui purge une peine de prison à vie en Turquie
depuis 1999.

Selon le dirigeant du Comité “Kurdistan” d’Arménie, Therkez Mstoïan,
“les grevistes exigent que M. Ocalan quitte sa cellule destinée à une
seule personne et déménage dans une cellule collective pour pouvoir
communiquer avec ses co-détenus”. En plus, “le niveau d’humidité trop
élevé dans sa cellule actuelle est dangereuse pour son état de
santé”, selon le responsable.

Les Kurdes d’Arménie exigent également que la Turquie “arrête la
politique visant à l’isolement du peuple kurde et apporte des
amendements à sa Constitution pour permettre aux Kurdes de recevoir
une éducation dans leur langue et de la pratiquer en liberté”, selon
un communiqué du Comité diffusé mercredi.

“Si la Turquie continue sa politique (actuelle), toute la
responsabilité (des conséquences) incombera aux autorités turques et
à l’Union Européenne qui garde le silence”, selon le texte.

Les Kurdes d’Arménie protestent également contre l’adhésion de la
Turquie à l’UE, “les 20 millions de Kurdes qui constituent un tiers
de la population turque étant privés des droits les plus
élémentaires”.

Abdullah Ocalan est incarcéré en isolement sur l’île-prison d’Imrali,
dans le nord-ouest de la Turquie. Agé de 55 ans, le leader du Parti
des travailleurs du Kurdistan (PKK, séparatistes kurdes de Turquie)
avait été condamné à la peine de mort en 1999 pour “séparatisme”,
pour avoir dirigé pendant quinze ans une rébellion visant à créer un
Etat indépendant dans le sud-est du pays, à majorité kurde. Cette
sanction avait été commuée en réclusion à perpétuité en octobre 2002
après l’abolition de la peine de mort en Turquie.

Ses défenseurs dénoncent systématiquement les conditions de détention
de leur client.

–Boundary_(ID_uH8CByi53XyEhAojPcDdUQ)–

Il =?UNKNOWN?Q?tab=F9?= del genocidio armeno: il negazionismo europe

La Padania, Italia
mercoledì 10 novembre 2004

Il tabù del genocidio armeno: il negazionismo europeo teme di
infastidire Istanbul

UN MILIONE E MEZZO DI SCHELETRI NELL’ARMADIO DELLA STORIA TURCA

PIER LUIGI PELLEGRIN

Buon sangue non mente. Gli insulti rivolti dal leader turco Erdogan
alla Lega Nord (“gruppuscolo politico”), fanno il paio con il
comportamento assunto dai suoi avi nei confronti della minoranza
armena, poco meno di novanta anni fa, prima di passare dalle parole
ai fatti, perpetrando uno dei più sanguinari olocausti che la storia
ricordi. Le aggressioni partirono dall’allora partito di governo
“Ittihad ve Terraki” (Unione e Progresso), espressione
dell’ultranazionalismo dei Giovani Turchi, che non poteva tollerare
le istanze di indipendenza avanzate dal popolo armeno: il pensiero di
“Unione e Progresso” puntava infatti all’omogeneizzazione
panturchista in chiave etnica e religiosa.
Il popolo armeno, quindi, si presentava come ostacolo a questo
progetto in quanto non solo aveva aderito fin dal ‘300 alla religione
cristiana, ma aveva anche culturalmente assorbito i principi legati a
quel modello di stato di diritto che si stava affermando nei paesi
occidentali ed europei. Il razzismo turco fu quindi un pretesto per
perseguire quello che di fatto era un fine politico ed economico,
data anche la prosperità terriera e finanziaria degli armeni.
Con simili presupposti fu relativamente facile, per i Giovani Turchi,
progettare a tavolino l’eliminazione degli armeni, per poi
realizzarla con precisione scientifica e certosina. I turchi,
insomma, non avrebbero avuto nulla da imparare dai nazisti.
Il piano di sterminio, comunque, venne stilato in dieci punti. Nel
primo si stabilì di mettere fuori legge le associazioni armene,
arrestare gli armeni colpiti in passato dall’accusa di tradimento,
deportarli ed eliminarli. La follia non cambia negli altri nove
passaggi, nei quali si progetta espressamente di sterminare gli
uomini sotto i cinquant’anni, i preti e i maestri, oppure di
deportare le famiglie dei fuggiaschi e impedire ogni comunicazione
tra loro.
Ma i Giovani Turchi con la tranquillità delle belve feroci decisero
anche di mettere in atto operazioni di propaganda e di istigazione
alla violenza delle popolazioni musulmane, nonché di licenziare i
funzionari di stato armeni adducendo motivi di sicurezza, mentre allo
stesso modo venne deciso di sterminare tutti gli armeni presenti
nell’esercito.
Il dato più raggelante di questa pianificazione, però, consiste nella
fervida raccomandazione di cominciare simultaneamente le operazioni
in aree diverse, in modo che le vittime non possano organizzare alcun
piano di fuga o di difesa. Una strategia di caccia ineccepibile, se
nel ruolo delle prede non ci fossero stati un milione e mezzo di
esseri umani.
L’Olocausto perpetrato dai turchi ha anche una ricorrenza, il 25
aprile: in questa data, infatti, nel 1915 vennero deportati,
massacrati e imprigionati tutti gli armeni di Costantinopoli.
Successivamente, nell’agosto dello stesso anno, vennero confiscati i
beni di tutta la popolazione armena, mentre in novembre venne
dichiarata la “Jihad”, ovvero la guerra santa contro gli infedeli (e
gli armeni erano cristiani).
Probabilmente è questo il punto fondamentale per comprendere quale
sia stata l’autentica piattaforma di partenza per il genocidio
armeno, ovvero la matrice religiosa. Secondo l’opinione degli
storici, infatti, il nazionalismo dei Giovani Turchi non sarebbe da
solo bastato a compattare quel patchwork di popoli e nazioni che era
diventato l’ex impero ottomano. Nello sterminio giocò, quindi, un
ruolo fondamentale l’impasto teocratico che avviluppava la società
turca, scatenandola in modo sanguinario contro il nemico cristiano,
in questo caso gli armeni.
Non a caso il genocidio del 1915 aveva avuto i suoi predecessori nei
progrom del biennio compreso tra il 1895 e 1897, quando il sultano
Abdul Hamid II sterminò 300.000 armeni. Nel XXI secolo la storia non
ha ancora chiuso i suoi debiti con questo popolo, come dimostra
l’estrema titubanza con la quale viene affrontato il tema del
genocidio. Basti pensare alla malinconica fine fatta dalla mozione
presentata nel 1998 da Giancarlo Pagliarini per il riconoscimento
dell’Olocausto armeno, firmata da 165 parlamentari di diversi
partiti, ma lasciata a bagnomaria dalla burocrazia romana fino al
2001, quando l’allora presidente del Consiglio, Giuliano Amato, la
respinse considerandola poco adatta al periodo storico-politico.
Evidentemente la memoria di 1.500.000 morti passava in secondo piano
rispetto agli interessi dell’Ulivo e di Romano Prodi, che
dell’ingresso della Turchia è il principale (e forse unico) paladino
europeo (e i turchi di ammettere il genocidio armeno non vogliono
nemmeno sentirne parlare).
A distanza di tre anni il clima è cambiato di poco, visto il silenzio
che politica e cultura hanno riservato all’interessante convegno,
svoltosi nei giorni scorsi, dedicato dalla Fondazione Cini di Venezia
al rapporto Turchia-Armenia. Lo stesso professor Antonio Rigo,
direttore dell’istituto “Venezia e l’Europa”, che con la Fondazione
Cini ha organizzato tale convegno, ha ammesso che: «Fino a poco tempo
fa, soprattutto pensando a qualche altro paese, un incontro del
genere non sarebbe stato possibile nemmeno immaginarlo». Come dire
che nei palazzi di potere la parola di Istanbul conta molto, più
delle coscienze e dei rimorsi.

,1,1

–Boundary_(ID_whka5cWvrnV+O7AJZRVJjg)–

http://www.lapadania.com/PadaniaOnLine/Articolo.aspx?pDesc=29470

Armenia Tries To Achieve Millennium Development Goals

ARMENIA TRIES TO ACHIEVE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS

A1 Plus | 16:52:07 | 08-11-2004 | Social |

Today the Ministry for Coordination of Territorial Administration and
Infrastructure Operations of Armenia and United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP) inaugurated a new project on the Establishment of
the Municipal Service System.

The aim of the project is to support decentralization and help
strengthen communities by focusing on the legislative, educational,
technical and operational systems that are necessary to ensure viable,
accountable and effective local administrations.

Within the framework of the project launched by Mr. Hovik Abrahamyan,
Minister for the Coordination of Territorial Administration and
Infrastructure Operations, and Ms. Lise Grande, UN Resident Coordinator
and UNDP Resident Representative, a package of legal acts aimed at
ensuring viable municipal service systems will be introduced. Steps
will also be taken to introduce performance-based budgeting at the
local level and training on fiscal decentralization will be provided
to community heads, members of local councils and municipal civil
servants.

“Together with the Government of Armenia we are trying to strengthen
local communities. This is particularly important because small
villages and former industrial towns have suffered enormously during
the past decade. Their economic viability has been undermined and large
parts of their populations have been forced to emigrate. To ensure that
Armenia remains strong and unified and that no one is left behind,
the country needs effective and accountable local administrations,
capable of providing public services and supporting the general needs
of the community”, Ms. Grande noted.

The Establishment of Municipal Service System project is a
two-year project with a budget of USD 312,700. To ensure successful
implementation, a Steering Committee will be formed comprised of
representatives of UNDP, Ministry for Coordination of Territorial
Administration and Infrastructure Operations, the Public Administration
Academy of Armenia and other partners.

Armenia chooses second mobile operator

Armenia chooses second mobile operator

Mediamax news agency
5 Nov 04

YEREVAN

The K-Telecom company will become Armenia’s second mobile operator.

This decision was taken on 3 November by the tender committee set up
by the Cabinet of Ministers, the government press service told
Mediamax. The tender committee was set up immediately after the
ArmenTel company was deprived of its monopoly in the sphere of mobile
services. The government press service is not saying how many
companies took part in the tender, which gave preference to K-Telecom.

The K-Telecom closed-type joint-stock company belongs to Lebanese
businessman Pierre Fattoush, who owns the Karabakh Telecom Company,
which provides mobile communication services on the territory of the
Nagornyy Karabakh Republic (NKR), Mediamax has learnt.

The perspective of Turkey’s membership of the European Union.

PCF (Communiqués de presse), France
Nov. 4, 2004

The perspective of Turkey’s membership of the European Union.

Statement of the French Communist Party.

The opening of negotiations with Turkey with a view to its joining the
European Union is provoking debates that go to the very conception of
Europe: what meaning must we give to this Union? What future do we want
to build for it?
The French Communist Party is actively working for a community of
solidarity between the European peoples; a Europe mobilised to achieve
social progress, democracy, the rights of human personality,
sustainable development openness to the world and peace.
This is why we indignantly reject certain arguments put forward to
oppose this membership, playing on the fear and the stigmatisation of
“the other”. They are offensive to the Turkish people and also to the
French people by the picture they give of it. They are, especially
dangerous because they feed, in their way, the pernicious theses that
humanity is torn asunder, not by the ravages of globalised capitalism
but by s so-called “clash of civilisations”, by nationalisms and
fundamentalisms.
Any opposition “on principle” to Turkey’s membership just because it is
Turkey is unacceptable.
BUT, to envisage that a common future be built in the interests of the
peoples of the European Union and in the interests of the Turkish
people, there are conditions to be created. There are requirements that
must be made to prevail with respect to Europe and with respect to
Turkey.
These requirements must be satisfied in terms of democracy and social
rights Carried forward by the Turkish people, its wage-earners, by all
the progressives and democrats of Turkey and of Turkish Kurdistan, who
aspire to a real State of law, guaranteeing the exercise of political,
social and cultural rights to all men and women. These forces, in this
spirit, are placing high hopes on the perspective of future membership,
they have noted that this perspective allows and feeds the process of
democratisation as embodied in the institutional reforms already
effected.
At the same time, they legitimately stress the considerable distance
that still has to be covered to finally extirpate the use of torture,
to reduce the power of the armed forces, for real justice, a stable and
respected State of Law, for equality between men and women. The
negotiations that are likely to begin must imperatively enable decisive
advances in all these areas, accompanied by guarantees and also reveal
a new readiness by the Turkish State with regard to the settlement of
the Cyprus question on the basis of international law and with regard
to the recognition of the Armenian genocide.
And these requirements of profound transformation apply equally to the
European Union. Its institutions and its policies, that the proposed
Constitution claims are irreversible, have set up a veritable
dictatorship of the financial markets. They have set wage-earners and
whole peoples in competition against one another, making life more
precarious, encouraging delocalisations, exerting constant pressure on
wages and social rights, breaking up public services, closing the door
on the rest of the world, NATOism. This is the “model” that they
purport to impose on Turkey, at the expense of its people. Already, the
Turkish Minister of Finance is announcing that the economic reforms
being undertaken jointly with the IMF will, in five years, enable his
country to observe all the Maastricht criteria: “We will represent a
particularly attractive alternative to candidates for delocalisation”
he pointed out. And the European Commission is evoking the military
role that Turkey could play tomorrow in the context of the Common
Security and Foreign Policy and as a buffer blocking the way to asylum
seekers.
Europe needs to change fundamentally and in depth so that its political
and financial institutions may favour rather than prevent the action of
the peoples, the wage-earners and citizens, for major reforms such as
security of employment and training and incomes; the upward
harmonisation of social legislation; the deployment of public services
enabling a struggle against the plagues of unemployment, poverty and
insecurity. They must extend and guarantee the fundamental rights that
its citizens must possess to enable the European peoples to build
together responses of solidarity and sharing, of common progress in the
problems that face them and to contribute to a world of cooperation and
peace.
That is the real question that runs through the process being
undertaken with Turkey, with the Turkish people: the urgency of a new
project and perspective for Europe, emancipated from the neo-liberalism
that is plunging it into crisis, which will allow it to respond to the
expectations and hopes of its people and of the world.

Scientists Close in on Source of Cosmic Rays

Reuters, UK
Nov. 3, 2004

Scientists Close in on Source of Cosmic Rays
Wed 3 November, 2004 18:01

LONDON (Reuters) – An international team of astronomers believe they
have solved a mystery that has been perplexing scientists for 100 years
— the origin of cosmic rays.

Scientists first discovered the energetic particles that bombard the
Earth nearly a century ago but where they come from has been one of the
big questions in astrophysics.

Using an array of four telescopes in Africa, the scientists produced
the first image showing that the source of cosmic rays could be the
remnant of a supernova, a powerful explosion of a star at the end of
its life.

“This is the first time we were able to take an image of the source,”
David Berge, an astrophysicist at the Max Planck Institute in
Heidelberg, Germany, told Reuters.

Scientists had long thought that supernova explosions were indeed the
source, but did not have evidence to support it, according to Berge,
who reported the findings in the science journal Nature.

He and colleagues from Britain, Armenia, France, Ireland, Namibia,
South Africa and the Czech Republic studied the remnant of a supernova
that exploded about 1,000 years ago and left a shell of debris.

“Because the energy density in cosmic rays is so large, they play an
important role in the development of our galaxy,” said Berge.

“We are now at a stage where we seem to be able to prove cosmic rays
come from supernova remnants.”

Professor Ian Halliday, head of the Particle Physics and Astronomy
Research Council (PPARC) which funds research, welcomed the findings.

“These results provide the first unequivocal proof that supernovae are
capable of producing large quantities of galactic cosmic rays —
something we have long suspected, but never been able to confirm,” he
said in a statement.

Armenia: Displaced by a Prestige Project

Caucasus Reporting Service
Armenia: Displaced by a Prestige Project

Householders complain of forcible eviction to make way for a grand avenue
through Yerevan.
By Rita Karapetian and Susanna Petrosian in Yerevan (CRS No. 260, 03-Nov-04)

Dozens of families who have lost their homes as part of the Armenian
government’s ambitious project to build a new avenue in the capital Yerevan
say their rights have been trampled on.
Now they are fighting to win compensation.
The multi-million dollar Northern Avenue begun three years ago is a prestige
project championed by the government. It will run through the centre of
Yerevan from the opera house to Republic Square.
The road is due to be finished next year, but only in the last few months
has the construction programme started to hit large numbers of local people.
While the government is taking pride in the new avenue, residents and
opposition politicians have accused the government of destroying the old
city of Yerevan and forcing people onto the street.
“The process of growing stratification in society that began over ten years
ago is continuing,” opposition parliamentary deputy Shavarsh Kocharian told
IWPR.
“And that polarisation now has a geographical form. The face of central
Yerevan is changing year in, year out, as its inhabitants are forced by
economic hardship to sell their homes and move to the outskirts.”
Another contentious issue is the threat the road construction could pose to
the Dalma Gardens, one of the largest green zones in the city. The gardens
are an ancient feature of the city and have their own irrigation system.
They also have 1,800 tenants, who tend allotments to grow grapes, peaches,
apricots and vegetables. For many of them the gardens are their main source
of livelihood.
But under a government decree from March last year, about half the area of
the Dalma Gardens is to be put up for auction and then used for real-estate
development.
“Yes, on 50 per cent of the gardens’ territory they will build elite
apartment blocks,” Suren Melikian, one of the tenants, told IWPR. “Those who
took that decision care nothing for the social position of the people or
their sources of subsistence,”
Another allotment holder, Ambartsum Khachatrian, said, “Not one of those who
conquered Armenia touched or damaged the Dalma, and we don’t understand why
the authorities want to destroy these gardens.
“We’re not only fighting for our own rights, we are also concerned about the
fate of the Dalma Gardens, which are effectively the lungs of Yerevan.”
The government has made a concession by allowing 580 plot-holders to renew
their contracts. However more than a thousand other tenants are still
awaiting their fate.
Parliamentary deputy Viktor Dallakian said that by law, anyone who has
farmed a plot of land for ten years must be given priority rights to rent or
privatise that land.
A number of people have lost their homes to the Northern Avenue project,
saying they were forced under duress to sign contracts selling their
property.
Vachagan Akopian, one of the evicted residents, claims that the
government-created Office to Implement the Northern Avenue Programme, OIP,
put unfair pressure on residents. “OIP representatives offered us agreements
which completely failed to take our interests into consideration.
“We were told: if you don’t sign the agreements and leave your houses in
five days, we will take you to court, after which a forced eviction will
follow.”
Mariam Gishian, a disabled person who refused to sign the agreement, said
she was forcibly evicted from her home by the court along with her five
children. “My children and I are sleeping in the open air,” she told IWPR.
“The money they gave me for selling my home is not enough even to buy a
garage,” Karine Palian, who has had to rent accommodation with her family
for eight months now, told IWPR.
Another resident, Gohar Sarkisian, told IWPR that her neighbour Shavarsh
Grigorian tried to kill himself when he saw an excavator demolishing his
house.
Vagram Abrahamian, an official in the presidential monitoring office, denied
that pressure had been applied to get people to leave, saying, “Everything
happened by people’s free will. Who could make someone sign the agreement?”
The OIP’s director Karen Davtian, who has been in the post for three month
now, also assured IWPR that the agreements were signed voluntarily.
Davtian said some homeowners had been paid as much as 280,000 US dollars,
while others who did not actually own their properties had received payments
of 3,500 dollars. He conceded that the latter group “really suffered” and
said he was investigating their complaints, as well as those of people who
had refused to sign contracts and were evicted from their homes.
Many residents said that their houses were protected by the state and could
not be subject to demolition.
However, Narek Sarkisian, a former chief architect of Yerevan who was until
recently the manager of the Northern Avenue project, said, “The problems to
be solved by town-planning change with time. There are some ulcers in the
centre of Yerevan – old barrack-like houses – and this is why we are doing
this project. Instead of these barracks, high-rise apartment blocks that
meet European standards will be built, and their ground floors will be made
into offices.”
A number of court cases are now in progress over the Northern Avenue scheme,
but Major-General Vaginak Kazarian, a legal expert, said that residents had
yet to win a single case.
Court rulings have cited two government decrees of October 2001 and August
2002, rather than the law, angering the plaintiffs.
“The government effectively took over the functions of the judicial body,
thus exceeding its own authority,” said Kazarian.
Government spokeswoman Meri Harutiunian told IWPR that every government
decree receives prior approval from the justice ministry to ensure it
conforms with the law – and that this had happened with the decrees on the
Dalma Gardens and the Northern Avenue.
The justice ministry refused to comment, saying it was inappropriate to do
while legal proceedings were still going on.
According to Vachagan Akopian, an activist in the Northern Avenue case, 27
lawsuits are ready to be filed to the European Court of Human Rights in
Strasbourg.
“We, the people who worked the Dalma Gardens, sparing no effort or our own
health, will not give up an inch of the land,” said plot-holder Khachatrian.
“We are prepared to fight till the end.”
Rita Karapetian and Susanna Petrosian are journalists for the Noyan Tapan
news agency in Yerevan