It is a stress for us every time to cross under Azeri flags, the head of Kajaran community says –

Panorama, Armenia

The residents of Syunik province have shown their real attitude toward the current leaders of Armenia, the head of Goris community Arush Arushanyan stated on Saturday during the congress of “Reviving Armenia” party. Arushanyan’s remarks came when asked to comment on Deputy Speaker of Parliament Alen Simonyan’s statement that Pashinyan would get more votes in Syunik than in Yerevan at present and during the elections. 

Board member at “Revivng Armenia” party, head of Meghri community Mkhitar Zakaryan, in turn, said, dignity and honor are some of the characteristics Syunik residents have been known for.  

“It is below my dignity to respond to Alen Simonyan’s remarks. If his predictions come true I will accept I do not know well my people,” Zakaryan said. 

As to possible visits of the representatives of the government to Syunik province, Zakaryan noted they would hardly dare to visit Syunik and pass near the Shurnukh dangerous areas, where the Azeri forces are deployed.  

Head of Kajaran community Manvel Paramazyan, who is also a board member at the party, stressed that Syunik has always been united, and there can be no second opinion on that. 

“I feel pain every time to cross under the flags of Azerbaijan. That is a stress for our people. Syunik residents are the ones who bear it. During the elections they will show their character,” said Paramazyan. 

The heads of communities stated that they enjoy respect among the locals, and the people are determined to support them during the elections. “Let me confess that I welcomed the new authorities in Armenia hoping for a change, yet we received only lies and empty promises. All of you have seen how we ended. That is the reason we called for the resignation of Pashinyan and will stick to our demand. We will continue till the end when a new government is formed.” said the head of Tatev community Murad Simonyan.  

Turkey’s diplomatic struggles in the Caucasus

Times Now News
March 10 2021

Neil Hauer| Security analyst
Updated Mar 10, 2021 | 14:24 IST

Much was made of Turkey’s return last year to one of its old stomping grounds – The Caucasus. Almost six months on, however, little of substance has materialized in Ankara’s diplomatic and military initiatives in the region.

For centuries, Turkey, in its previous incarnation as the Ottoman Empire, controlled the western portion of the South Caucasus, including much of western Georgia and historical western Armenia. Following the Ottoman collapse, Ankara was locked out of the region owing to Soviet domination. Even after the break-up of the Soviet Union, Turkey remained a peripheral player owing to its own weakness and greater interests elsewhere.

That all seemed to change last autumn. After nearly three decades of mostly low-key support to its Turkic ally, Azerbaijan, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan decided to throw Turkey’s military and political weight behind Baku to reignite the long-dormant Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Turkish drones and commanders played a key role in the ensuing 44-day war that ended in victory for Azerbaijan. It seemed Turkey had waltzed into Russia’s backyard and imposed itself on a region hitherto dominated almost entirely by Russian (and some Western) influence.

But what has Turkey actually won for itself in the Caucasus? The evidence suggests it is very little of any lasting substance.

The first difficulties emerged immediately after the war ended in a ceasefire in the early hours of November 10. The ceasefire was a trilateral agreement between Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia, who were both architects and guarantors of the deal. There was no mention of Turkey.

Turkish officials insisted repeatedly that they would be part of the ceasefire monitoring operations, as well as any future negotiations on the status of Nagorno-Karabakh. On November 12, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu even declared that Turkey’s role in monitoring the ceasefire would be “exactly the same as Russia’s.” Russian diplomats have refuted this claim, however, reaffirming that the November 10 agreement concerns only Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. Other parties, including Turkey, have no part in it.

Nevertheless, a memorandum on a joint Turkish-Russian monitoring centre was signed in mid-November. But when the centre finally opened on January 30, it turned out to be situated around 10 km outside Karabakh itself, with a staff of only around 100, half of them Turkish.

Meanwhile, under the trilateral agreement, Russia had already deployed well over 2,000 personnel – equipped with heavy weaponry and vehicles – in Karabakh itself and were interacting directly with both Azeri and Karabakh Armenian personnel. Turkey’s presence appeared to be not only largely symbolic but also of greater benefit to the Russians, giving them boots on the ground on both sides of the line while Ankara was sidelined.

Other Turkish efforts to enter the diplomatic realm over Karabakh have similarly come to nought. Even though the OSCE’s Minsk Group, which until now has been the primary international vehicle for negotiations over Karabakh, seems to be moribund at present. Turkey continues to be rebuffed.

Ankara’s suggestions for other regional dialogue forums have met with a cool reception. The most ambitious of these, the “3+3” format (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia plus Russia, Turkey and Iran) promoted by Cavusoglu, has proved unacceptable to Armenia and Georgia, which is no great surprise. Ankara’s failure to see the obvious – that Tbilisi would object to working with Moscow – shows a certain naiveté.

Turkey’s attempt to end another long-standing quarrel in the Caucasus, between itself and Armenia, has also been ham-fisted at best. In recent months, Turkish officials have indicated frequently a willingness to reopen the border between their countries, which has been closed since 1993, and to establish diplomatic relations.

In this, Turkey would appear to hold most of the cards. If Ankara takes a unilateral decision to reopen the border, this essentially presents Armenia with a fait accompli. Russia would certainly encourage such a move as it could then establish its own overland link – via Azerbaijan and Armenia – with Turkey

But Ankara has shown little understanding of the political sensitivity of the matter in Armenia, with Erdogan in particular repeatedly issuing harshly-worded statements against Yerevan and in support of Baku. Without even the slightest show of empathy toward the issue of the Armenian genocide – let alone the open support for Azerbaijan in the recent war – the chances of a genuine relationship with Armenia are slim.

So what does Ankara have to show for the recent postwar months in the Caucasus? It has strengthened relations with Azerbaijan, but even those are tempered by Baku’s careful foreign-policy balancing act with Russia and the West. Turkey has made no tangible progress in asserting itself as a bilateral or multilateral partner with either Georgia or Armenia and has shown little understanding of the region’s dynamics.

In this context, Turkey’s role in the Caucasus is not so dissimilar to Iran’s: a former imperial power that once dominated half the region, but whose influence now is extremely limited. It will take significantly more nuance and skill if Ankara wishes to truly extend its reach into the Caucasus.

In arrangement with Syndication Bureau

Neil Hauer is a guest contributor. Views expressed are personal.

 

Turkish Press: Krikor Köçeoğlu: Armenian Ottoman calligrapher of Kufic style

Daily Sabah, Turkey
March 10 2021
An interior view from the Zühtü Pasha Mosque shows its calligraphic decorations, Kadıköy, Istanbul.

When it comes to Islamic arts, calligraphy is the first one that comes to mind. This art has such a significant place in the Ottoman Empire that it has gained a unique style and reached “perfection” there. For this reason, the saying, “The Quran was revealed in Mecca, read in Egypt, written in Istanbul” is still echoing in the ears as a cliche truth. When Turkish calligraphy is mentioned, great artists in history such as Sheikh Hamdullah, Ahmet Karahisari, Hafız Osman and Mustafa Rakım Efendi are commemorated. However, a few people know that there was an Armenian calligrapher in history, who is none other than Krikor Köçeoğlu, also known as Krikor Köçeyan.

A photo of Armenian Ottoman calligrapher Krikor Köçeoğlu.

As one of the last great empires in history, the Ottoman Empire carried its sociological wealth to the field of culture and art. Istanbul, which was the center of Turkish arts in addition to being the “capital” of the empire, and the Ottoman palaces were the places where cultural diversity was most visible. Many European figures such as Fausto Zonaro were charged with the task of painting as a “court painter,” which has existed since the era of Sultan Mehmed II, also known as Mehmed the Conqueror, in the Ottoman Empire. These artists performed their art under the patronage of the sultan himself.

The Ottomans’ non-Muslim citizens, who were called “dhimmi,” also produced arts in the empire. However, the Armenians stand out among the non-Muslim citizens in both crafts and arts. The artistic Manas family, who has served Ottoman palaces for generations, was one of them. The architect members of the Armenian Balyan family similarly served the Ottoman sultans and built many mosques. The Abdullah brothers of Armenian origin were also the official photographers of the Ottoman Empire. They were also known with their name in Latin lettering as “Abdullah Freres.” Different nations and non-Muslims in the Ottoman Empire had the opportunity to produce artistic works even on Islamic structures in the climate of tolerance shown to them in line with Islamic law.

Krikor Köçeoğlu, who was the first known Armenian and non-Muslim calligraphy artist of the Ottoman Empire (rumor has it that he converted to Islam later) found a chance to learn the art of calligraphy, which was based on the writing of the sacred texts of Muslims. Moreover, he became skilled enough to write calligraphy on architectural works.

A calligraphy plate that artist Krikor Köçeoğlu created for the Zühtü Pasha Mosque in Istanbul.

According to rumor, Krikor Köçeoğlu was born as the second son of Hovşep Köçeoğlu, one of the well-known rich people of Istanbul’s Kadıköy district, in 1845. Krikor first studied at the Pangaltı Armenian School, and when his talent for painting was discovered, he was sent to Paris – like many children of rich families at that time – and studied art at the Ecole Muradian school. Gaining an orientalist spirit while studying in France, he returned to the Ottoman lands after a while. The artist first took part in the exhibition organized by Ahmed Ali Pasha, better known as Şeker Ahmed Pasha, in 1873. Appreciated by the critics, he made a name for himself with this very first show. Joining the newly opened Elifba Art Club at that time, he succeeded in becoming one of the well-known painters of the period, just like Osman Hamdi Bey. Krikor Köçeoğlu also made a pencil portrait of the famous Ottoman writer Ahmed Midhat Efendi.

Despite being Armenian, Krikor Köçeoğlu became interested in the art of calligraphy. This does not mean his Armenian identity prevents him from dealing with the art of calligraphy. But there was no precedent of an Armenian calligrapher at that time. Köçeyan tends toward the “Kufic script,” which gained prominence early on. It was not one of the most frequently used calligraphy styles in that period and was not very popular in Istanbul either. Unlike other styles of calligraphy, it does not have a system of teacher-student (master-apprentice). Krikor is thought to have seen this style in some architectural works in northwestern Bursa. And he finally applied his art into an unforgettable work. The Armenian artist created the calligraphy works of the worship place built by the order of Zühtü Pasha in 1884. This place would be called “Zühtü Pasha Mosque”. He wrote the inscriptions on the interior of the mosque and the cover on which the Quranic verses were written in letters with floral motifs. Although there are other rumors, an important part of art historians are sure that the lines in the mosque were written by him.

A photo of Ottoman intellectual Ebüzziya Tevfik. (Courtesy of Salt Archives)

This work is the biggest use of Kufic-style writings in Istanbul. As a matter of fact, Ottoman intellectual Ebüzziya Tevfik, who played a role in the revival of the kufi style at the end of the 19th century, praises Köçeoğlu for this reason. Using the terms “reformer” and ” regenerative” about him, Ebüzziya Tevfik expresses that Krikor Köçeoğlu has mastered all kinds of Kufic writing and that he created a “cute” writing style by skillfully blending Persian and Ottoman Kufic styles.

Krikor Köçeoğlu, who is known to have interpreted poet Kazım Pasha’s works on paper with the art of calligraphy, later returned to Paris. We have very little information about the life of the artist, who is said to have died there in 1883, or his calligraphy works. Author Kevork Pamukciyan, known for his books on Ottoman Armenians, reported in an article that Krikor Köçeoğlu became a Muslim along with his family. However, no other work stands out to confirm this information. The frequent use of the artist’s second name as “Köçeoğlu” rather than “Köçeyan” in some sources can be seen as a remarkable detail at this point. The life of the Armenian Ottoman calligrapher is interesting and full of secrets waiting to be solved.

A view from the Zühtü Pasha Mosque in Istanbul’s Kadıköy district.

In short, Krikor Köçeoğlu contributed to the enrichment of the Kufic style by adding new interpretations to this script, which dates back to the Abbasid era (750–1258). Krikor Efendi, who made history with his actions and interesting personality, died in Paris when he was only 38 years old. Whether Krikor, who decorated verses and hadiths gracefully, is a Muslim is still a mystery to us.

Sultan Abdülhamid II also gave great value to the Kufic style writing, which was revived 300 years later by Ebüzziya Tevfik and Krikor Köçeoğlu. The sultan, who was interested in arts, asked Ebüzziya Tevfik to use Kufic calligraphy in the Yıldız Hamidiye Mosque, commissioned by himself. Kufic writing, which was revived in those years, started to be used in many places from book covers to mosque decorations, from signs in government offices to paintings.

Armenpress: Newly appointed Ambassador of Finland delivers credentials to President Sarkissian

Newly appointed Ambassador of Finland delivers credentials to President Sarkissian

Save

Share

 17:54, 11 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 11, ARMENPRESS. Newly appointed Ambassador of Finland to Armenia Kirsti Narinen (residence in Helsinki) delivered credentials to President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the President’s Office.

President Sarkissian congratulated the Ambassador on the occasion of assuming the post and wished productive work. The President expressed confidence that the Ambassador will contribute to the strengthening of relations between the two friendly countries.

During the meeting the sides also referred to the opportunities of cooperation between the two countries, as well as exchanged views on regional issues.

Armenpress: President Sarkissian will not sign decree on appointing Artak Davtyan Chief of General Staff

President Sarkissian will not sign decree on appointing Artak Davtyan Chief of General Staff

Save

Share

 21:09,

YEREVAN, MARCH 11, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian returned with his objections the PM’s proposal to appoint Artak Davtyan Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Armenia and the draft decree attached to it. On the same day, the Prime Minister’s substantiations on the President’s objections were received.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the President’s Office, Armen Sarkissian will not sign the draft decree and will not apply to the Constitutional Court.

Asbarez: Boston Mayor Rescinds Pro-Azeri Khojaly Proclamation



Boston Mayor Marty Walsh pictured during his formal remarks at the centennial commemoration of the Armenian Genocide at Armenian Heritage Park, April 2015 (Photo: Isabel Leon from the office of Marty Walsh/City of Boston/Facebook)

BY LILLIAN AVEDIAN AND LEEZA ARAKELIAN
From The Armenian Weekly

BOSTON—Mayor Marty Walsh has issued a statement of apology to the Armenian community of Boston and rescinded a recent proclamation declaring February 26 Khojaly Commemoration Day. “Unfortunately on our part, this was done without our typical review process, which includes conferring with all those potentially impacted,” the apology letter reads. “Following conversations with leaders of the Armenian-American community, we realize that this proclamation has been hurtful to many of you.”

For the past week, members of Boston’s Armenian community and abroad have been contacting the mayor’s office, urging him to reverse the proclamation following a call to action from the Armenian National Committee of America Eastern Region.

“The ANC-of Eastern Massachusetts would like to thank the mayor for acting on this quickly. It was very clear that it wasn’t professionally vetted,” said chairman Dr. Aram Kaligian in an interview with the Armenian Weekly. “The mayor has been a friend to the community,” he continued.

Indeed, Mayor Walsh, who is preparing for his transition to become the US Secretary of Labor, has participated in several Armenian Genocide commemorations both at the Massachusetts State House and Armenian Heritage Park, where he proclaimed that Armenians have made Boston a “stronger city.”

Mayor Walsh’s letter

“Our goal when issuing a proclamation is to honor and celebrate the contributions of Bostonians from all walks of life, and not to engage in international matters that can cause pain or divisiveness,” the letter reads.

This is not the first time that a municipal or state government has declared February 26 Khojaly Commemoration Day. Nearly identical proclamations were announced by the mayor of Portland, Maine and the governor of Minnesota. Each of these declarations followed appeals by local Azerbaijani community organizations, including the Azerbaijani Society of Maine and the Azerbaijani Association in Minnesota. According to various Azerbaijani news sites, the Boston proclamation was adopted on the initiative of the New-England based Azerbaijan Center. All three cite Human Rights Watch in marking the 29th anniversary of the “largest massacre of the 1990s, the Khojaly Massacre.” The ANC of Eastern Massachusetts underscores, however, that the proclamations are rife with distortions and exaggerations and erase the role of Azeri troops in the fighting around Khojaly.

“This is clearly part of a Turkish-Azeri propaganda effort to reduce the significance of the Armenian Genocide and crimes against humanity that the Turkish government has committed in the past,” Kaligian said. “It’s also a way of reducing the culpability of the present Turkish and Azeri governments in their war crimes against Armenians.”

Middlesex Sheriff Peter Koutoujian, who has known Mayor Walsh since 1996 during their time together in the state legislature, commends local activists for mobilizing and asking the mayor to reconsider the February 26 statement. “This is a proud day for our community in Greater Boston. This is a proud day to be Armenian,” said Sheriff Koutoujian in an interview with the Weekly. “We were recognized, and we were respected. This is a good day for our community to show that people believe in us.”

CivilNet: Presidential Elections – by Direct Vote or Without it?

CIVILNET.AM

11 Mar, 2021 10:03

Ahead of the constitutional reforms in Armenia, the Friedrich Ebert Foundation organized a discussion on the topic “Presidential Elections – by Popular Vote: Pros and Cons”. 

Speakers:

Prof. Fernando Casal Bértoa, Associate Professor at the University of Nottingham (UK), 

Mr. Daniel Ioannisyan, Program Coordinator of the Union of Informed Citizens (UIC),

The discussion is moderated by Arshaluys Mghdesyan.

A full analysis by Professor Bértoa on the topic can be found here:

Armenia removes Marianne Clark-Hattingh as UNICEF rep. for uncooperativeness and failures

Save

Share

 10:04, 9 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 9, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs revealed the reasons behind suspending Marianne Clark-Hattingh’s duties as UNICEF’s Representative in Armenia.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Anna Naghdalyan told ARMENPRESS that the Armenian government made the decision to suspend Clark-Hattingh due to her “failures in implementing her mandate and uncooperative conduct.”

“UNICEF’s Representative in Armenia Marianne Clark-Hattingh’s failures in the implementation of her mandate and her uncooperative conduct were problematic for the Armenian side, hence the Government of Armenia made a decision to suspend Clark-Hattingh’s tenure as UNICEF’s Representative in Armenia. The UN Resident Coordinator and representatives of UNICEF were notified on the decision,” Naghdalyan said.

A replacement for Clark-Hattingh is yet to be named. 

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Artsakh reports 5 new COVID-19 cases in one day

Tweet
Save

Share

 11:25, 2 March, 2021

STEPANAKERT, MARCH 2, ARMENPRESS. 5 new cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed in Artsakh in the past 24 hours, the ministry of healthcare reports.

123 COVID-19 tests were conducted on March 1.

The total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in the Republic has reached 2390.

The ministry once again urges citizens to follow all the rules to prevent the further spread of the pandemic.