Changing The Minsk Group Format Not On The OSCE Agenda, Azerbaijani

CHANGING THE MINSK GROUP FORMAT NOT ON THE OSCE AGENDA, AZERBAIJANI VICE-SPEAKER SAYS

armradio.am
24.09.2008 15:25

Changing of the Minsk Group format is not on the agenda of the OSCE,
Vice-Speaker of the Azerbaijani Parliament Bahar Muradova said to
journalists on 24 September, Trend News reported.

"I think that is a right decision," she said.

According to Muradova, the situation in the region made the OSCE
countries refuse from double standards. "As long as settling of
conflicts is lingered, the international community will be facing
more serious threats," she said.

"The key topic on the OSCE agenda is the normalization of
Russia-Georgia relations. OSCE tries to restore the former relations
between Russia and Georgia through negotiations. Azerbaijan also
supports normalization of the relations between the two countries,"
Vice-Speaker said.

OSCE can achieve resolution of the conflict in the region only by
means of talks. OSCE is concerned that Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has
not yet been solved, therefore, the Organization posed the question of
making all efforts for sooner solution of the problem, Muradova said.

Cyprus: Adventist ‘Meeting Point’ In Limassol To Provide Spiritual,

CYPRUS: ADVENTIST ‘MEETING POINT’ IN LIMASSOL TO PROVIDE SPIRITUAL, PUBLIC SERVICES

Adventist Press Service APD
23.09.2008
Switzerland

Adventist ministry center ‘hub of belonging’ for island’s locals,
tourists, church leader says

Seventh-day Adventists in the south coast town of Limassol, the
island’s largest seaside resort, have converted a former seafront
taxi office into a ministry center.

"Our purpose is to meet the needs of the surrounding people, many of
whom are immigrants and tourists," David J. Cox, church president for
Cyprus, said of Meeting Point, which opened this month. "We want it
to be a hub of belonging in the heart of the tourist area."

Church leaders in Cyprus say Meeting Point will offer worship services
as well as parenting seminars, music and art workshops, children’s
clubs and a resource library with Internet access. Partnerships with
local professionals will provide free legal advice and other services
to community members.

Limassol, the second-largest city of Cyprus, attracts a wide range
of tourists mostly during the summer season to be accommodated in
its several luxurious hotels and apartments.

"We are pleased that the Limassol members have a strong mission focus
and are anxious to connect more effectively with the wider community,"
Kjell Aune, church leader in the Middle East, said at the September
13 opening.

Most Greek Cypriots are members of the Greek Orthodox Church, whereas
most Turkish Cypriots are Muslim. According to Eurobarometer 2005,
Cyprus is one of the most religious countries in the European Union,
along with Malta, Romania, Greece and Poland. In addition to the
Orthodox Christian and Muslim communities, there are also small Baha’í,
Jewish, Protestant, Roman Catholic, Maronite (Eastern Rites Catholic)
and Armenian Apostolic communities in Cyprus. Nearly 100 Adventists
worship in Cyprus. [Editors: Alex Elmadjian and Christian B. Schaffler
for ANN/APD]

–Boundary_(ID_LU5LB4xu/gL5+piUwGDJcg)–

European Currency Surges 10.7 Points Against Armenian Dram

EUROPEAN CURRENCY SURGES 10.7 POINTS AGAINST ARMENIAN DRAM

ARKA
Sep 22, 2008

YEREVAN, September 22. /ARKA/. Euro leapt 10.7 points against Armenian
national currency on Monday to AMD 441.04 for â~B¬1.

Such a soar reflects the current situation on world foreign exchange
markets.

In particular, euro value grew to 36.785 Russian rubles MICEX, Moscow
Interbank Currency Exchange on Monday hitting the record high from
early September.

In Armenia, euro value hit the record high as well, excluding September
1, when one euro cost AMD 442.9.

Analysts at ARKA News Agency point out constant devaluation of
U.S. currency against euro on world currency exchanges.

One euro reached $1.46 on world markets later that day. The same
happened also on Armenian foreign exchange (on average market exchange
rate through Armenian dram).

Unlike euro, Armenian national currency was relatively stable against
the dollar in September. ($1=AMD 302.64, EUR1=441.04).

–Boundary_(ID_dphL7ziaYRwoV4pT2fMM Hw)–

President Sargsyan Met With Foreign Scholars

PRESIDENT SARGSYAN MET WITH FOREIGN SCHOLARS

armradio.am
20.09.2008 14:25

President Serzh Sargsyan today received the scholars who have arrived
in Armenia from different countries to participate in the celebration
of the 100th anniversary of Viktor Hambartsumyan.

Thanking the guests for accepting the invitation to participate
in the celebration of the prominent scientist’s 100th jubilee,
President Sargsyan said: "Viktor Hambartsumyan was really one of the
most talented sons of the Armenian nation and our people feel deep
respect for his memory, having at least for reasons for that. Viktor
Hambartsumyan was a world-known scientist: the exact sciences largely
advanced at the National Academy of Sciences after Viktor Hambartsumyan
came to Armenia. Thanks to the great scientist Armenia became more
famous in the world. Viktor Hambartsumyan was a prominent humanist,
accepting the universal human values. He was very close to the pains
of the people, and he managed to contribute to the solution of many
problems with his celebrity and respect."

According to the President, Armenians will always remember the great
son of the Armenian nation, and the authorities will do their best
for this process to be stable. "We shall keep Viktor Hambartsumyan’s
memory unfading," Serzh Sargsyan said, underlining that it’s first
of all necessary to the younger generation.

Turning to the current state of science in the country, the President
noted that the attentions to science increases parallel to the growth
of the state’s opportunities. "We are trying to develop the spheres,
which have been traditional in Armenia and can yield results today. We
are trying to create small scientific centers, encourage the youth
to get engaged in science."

The prominent scholars that arrived in Armenia from the United
States, Russia, France, Belarus and other countries noted that
Viktor Hambartsumyan is one of the exceptional personalities not
only in Armenia but also in world science. They attached importance
to continuing the cooperation in the filed of scientific activity
and expressed confidence that President Sargsyan’s attitude towards
science will definitely yield results and Armenia will appear before
the world with brilliant names.

CoE Congress Of Local And Regional Authorities To Observe Elections

COE CONGRESS OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL AUTHORITIES TO OBSERVE ELECTIONS IN ARMENIA

armradio.am
19.09.2008 17:30

Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Council of Europe is
going to observe elections to the local self-government bodies that
are to be held on September 28, 2008 in the communities of Kentron,
Nor Nork, Nork-Marash, Avan, Davidashen, Shengavit of Yerevan city
(10 observers).

The same organization will carry out the election observation mission
during the elections to the local self-government bodies in the
communities of marzes of Armavir, Lori, Tavush that are to be held
on October 19, 2008 (13 observers).

The United States And International Development: Partnering For Grow

THE UNITED STATES AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: PARTNERING FOR GROWTH

Bureau of Economic, Energy and Business Affairs
Washington, DC
September 16, 2008

"We lead the world in providing food aid, improving education for boys
and girls, and fighting disease. Through the historic commitments of
the United States and other G8 countries, we are working to turn the
tide against HIV/AIDS and malaria in Africa. To achieve this noble
goal, all nations must keep their promises to deliver this urgent aid."

–President George W. Bush, June 13, 2008

The United States is committed to helping the world’s poor. Development
depends on strong, accountable governance and economic policies
unleashing private sector growth. At the International Conference on
Financing for Development at Monterrey in 2002, the world articulated
a new model for development, calling on developing countries to
establish sound economic and social policies and for developed
countries to support these efforts through an open trading system,
private capital flows, and additional development assistance. The
United States approach to development assistance is based on the
belief that foreign assistance is most effective when it supports
nations making necessary political and economic reforms.

The U.S. Record

World’s largest donor of bilateral foreign assistance and largest
contributor to multilateral development institutions. Official
Development Assistance (ODA) of $21.8 billion (net disbursed) in 2007.

U.S. bilateral ODA to sub-Saharan Africa (excluding debt relief)
increased to $4.5 billion in 2007 from $4.2 billion in 2006.

U.S. bilateral ODA to least developed countries increased to $4.8
billion in 2007.

$6.3 billion in compact funding approved for 18 strongly performing
countries in the last four years by the Millennium Challenge
Corporation.

$18.8 billion in HIV/AIDS funding through the U.S. President’s
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through fiscal year (FY)
2008. Reauthorization of up to an additional $48 billion for HIV/AIDS,
tuberculosis and malaria for 2009-2013.

$3 billion in U.S. humanitarian assistance provided in 2007.

Top net goods importer from developing countries at $573 billion in
2007 ($981 billion in imports minus $409 billion in exports).

$12 billion in private U.S. charitable contributions (not included
in ODA) to developing countries in 2007.

Top contributor to humanitarian clearance of landmines and explosive
remnants of war.

Elements of the U.S. Contribution to Development

>From 2000-2007, the Bush Administration dramatically increased
U.S. Official Development Assistance. The increase of 118% over eight
years is a faster rate than at any time since the period immediately
following World War II.

In 2007 U.S. ODA was $21.8 billion, a decline of $1.8 billion relative
to the 2006 level; $1.6 billion of this change is accounted for by a
decline in debt=2 0relief activities after major new actions in 2006
and a decline in ODA to Iraq. Iraq and Afghanistan were the largest
recipients of bilateral aid in 2007, with $3.7 billion going to Iraq
and $1.6 billion going to Afghanistan.

This assistance provided for programs in humanitarian relief, economic
development, counter-narcotics, good governance, health, clearance
of landmines, and other reconstruction assistance. In addition,
$4.8 billion went to the world’s least developed countries, and a
further $1.6 billion to other low-income countries, not including
U.S. regional and global programs. In advance of the 2005 G-8 Summit,
President Bush announced that the United States would double its
assistance to sub-Saharan Africa from 2004 to 2010. From a 2004 base
of $4.3 billion, with planned increases in disbursements, the U.S. is
on track to meet that pledge.

In March 2005, the U.S. endorsed the Paris Declaration on Aid
Effectiveness, which emphasized that existing aid levels should be
used more effectively.

The USG reached an agreement in October 2007 with the "Nordic +" group
of leading donor countries to work jointly to improve aid effectiveness
in selected countries, and in September 2008 endorsed the Accra Agenda
for Action to advance Paris Declaration implementation.

Millennium Challenge Account

The Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) is an innovative model in
development assistance. It is built on the principle that foreign=2
0aid yields better results where sound economic policies and good
governance provide an enabling environment for economic growth. The
total MCA appropriated funding from FY 2004 through FY 2008 exceeds
$7.5 billion.

Since its inception in 2004, the Millennium Challenge Corporation
(MCC), which implements the MCA, has approved agreements, called
compacts, with 18 strongly performing countries — Armenia, Benin,
Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, El Salvador, Georgia, Ghana, Honduras,
Lesotho, Madagascar, Mali, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia,
Nicaragua, Tanzania, and Vanuatu — totaling $6.3 billion dollars.

To provide further incentive for reform and help additional countries
qualify for compact funding, MCC provides "threshold" assistance to
help countries address specific areas of policy weakness. To date,
MCC has approved threshold programs with 18 countries totaling over
$400 million.

MCC also created a private sector initiatives office in November 2007
to enhance private sector engagement.

U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

In 2003, President George W. Bush launched the U.S. President’s
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to combat global HIV/AIDS
– the largest commitment by any nation to combat a single disease
in history. By the end of FY 2008, the American people will have
invested $18.8 billion in the global fight against HIV/AIDS. On July
30, 2008, President Bush signed into law a=2 0bill that will increase
the U.S. financial commitment to the fight against global HIV/AIDS,
tuberculosis, and malaria, authorizing up to $48 billion more to
combat the three diseases for five additional years, from 2009 to
2013. When President Bush launched PEPFAR, approximately 50,000 people
in sub-Saharan Africa were receiving antiretroviral treatment. Today,
PEPFAR supports lifesaving treatment for over 1.7 million people
worldwide, the vast majority of them in sub-Saharan Africa. PEPFAR
has also supported care for more than 6.6 million people, including
2.7 million orphans and vulnerable children. To date, PEPFAR has
allowed nearly 200,000 children to be born HIV free.

Through PEPFAR, the U.S. Government is the largest single contributor
to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, having
provided over $2.5 billion since the launch of the Fund in 2002,
or approximately thirty percent of the Global Fund’s total resources.

Other Health Initiatives

President Bush announced the President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI) in
June 2005. A five-year, $1.2 billion program, PMI challenges other
governments and the private sector to join the U.S. government in
combating malaria, with the goal of cutting the malaria mortality
rate by 50 percent in 15 countries in Africa. Through partnerships
working in the first three target countries – Angola, Tanzania,
and Uganda – PMI reached about six million people in its initial
year. In its second year, with an expanded program, an estimated 25
million persons benefited from life-saving prevention or treatment
interventions including insecticide-treated bednets, indoor residual
spraying, artemisinin-based combination therapies, and preventive
treatment of pregnant women. Other target countries added in FY 2007
include Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, and Senegal. Benin, Ethiopia,
Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali, and Zambia were added in FY
2008. Evidence is beginning to show that this effort is effectively
reducing malaria transmission.

The U.S. has also been a strong supporter of tuberculosis (TB)
control efforts globally. Between 2000 and 2007, the U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID) provided nearly $600 million for TB
programs worldwide, including about $166 million directed specifically
to Africa. USAID support has contributed to increased average detection
rates and treatment success rates in 19 focus countries, and between
2002 and 2008 the United States supported effective treatment for 10
million people with TB. In FY 2007, USAID provided $5 million to the
STOP TB Partnership’s Global TB Drug Facility (GDF), an important
mechanism that provides drugs to countries in need, including many
countries in Africa. USAID funding to the GDF will increase to $15
million before the end of FY 2008. Additionally, seventeen percent of
support for the Global Fund has been dedicated to TB work, and PEPFAR
0Aincreased its funding from $26 million in FY 2005 to a planned
level of $150 million for FY 2008 to address TB/HIV co-infections.

Humanitarian Assistance

The U.S. is the largest donor country of official humanitarian
aid for victims of famine, persecution, war and natural
disasters. U.S. humanitarian assistance totaled roughly $3 billion for
2007, and was aimed at helping those affected by disaster through the
rapid delivery of food, water, shelter, and health care. The United
States is working to help the countries most affected by increased
global food prices. As the largest single country providing food aid,
the U.S. gave $1.87 billion in food aid in 2007 to help food insecure
countries. The U.S. is also the largest single country supporting
refugee protection, assistance and durable solutions. In addition,
the U.S. provides major resources for ongoing reconstruction efforts
to help nations recovering from conflict and natural disasters. The
U.S. military, in cooperation with USAID, has been mobilized to deliver
life-saving aid to victims of large-scale disasters as quickly as
possible, such as after the Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004 and the
South Asian earthquake of 2005.

Through the Humanitarian Mine Action Program, the U.S. has contributed
over $1.3 billion since 1993 to mine clearance, mine survivors
assistance, mine risk education, and research and development on
detection and clearance technologies. These efforts have contributed
to the steep decline in casualties from persistent landmines and
explosive remnants of war, from about 26,000 annually five years ago
to approximately 6,000 worldwide in 2006.

Debt Forgiveness

At the G8 summit in 2005, the U.S. led efforts to obtain G8 approval of
the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI). The initiative called
for 100 percent cancellation of heavily indebted poor countries’
(HIPCs) eligible debt obligations to the World Bank, African
Development Bank, and the International Monetary Fund.

Nineteen African countries have already benefited from MDRI debt
relief and another 14 African countries are eligible to receive similar
debt cancellation once they achieve the required standards. With the
additional debt relief provided by the Inter-American Development Bank,
this initiative has eliminated over $42 billion in current and future
multilateral debt service for 25 countries in Africa and elsewhere.

Under the enhanced HIPC initiative, the United States and other
creditors together have cancelled an additional $45 billion. Taken
together, these international efforts are projected to remove a debt
burden of over $110 billion in current and future debt service for
33 heavily indebted poor countries. Another seven countries could
eventually qualify under these initiatives.

Multilateral Contributions

The U.S. is the world’s single largest contributor to the United
Nations and to the multilateral development banks (MDBs). In 2007,
U.S. contributions to multilateral organizations including the UN,
World Bank, and other MDBs totaled approximately $2.9 billion. Of
this total, $692 million was provided to the United Nations. The
U.S. has committed $950 million per year to the International
Development Association, the component of the World Bank that helps
the world’s poorest nations, for 2006-2008. These contributions
are to organizations promoting economic growth, poverty reduction,
and increased living standards through development and humanitarian
assistance. Our assistance leverages tens of billions of dollars from
other donors.

Trade

Trade is a powerful anti-poverty tool, spurring economic growth,
increasing opportunity, and creating new and better paying jobs. In
recognition of this fact, the U.S. has led by example in promoting
trade with developing countries. The United States is the largest
net importer from developing countries at $573 billion in 2007 ($981
billion in imports minus $409 billion in exports). This amount dwarfs
the size of other financial flows to these countries, creating jobs
for millions of people. Through preference programs including the
African Growth and Opportunity Act, the Caribbean Basin Initiative,
the Andean Trade Preference Act, and the Generalized System of
Preferences, many developing country goods receive zero-tariff access
to the U.S. market. The U.S. has taken a bold position in World
Trade Organization =0 Anegotiations, with ambitious proposals that
aim to ensure the realization of the development potential of the
Doha Round. The U.S. is also a leader in "trade capacity building"
programs aimed at allowing developing nations to better integrate
into and benefit from the global trading system, contributing $7.6
billion total since 2000.

Other Private Financial Flows

The U.S. is the leading country in private financial flows to the
developing world, with net capital flows exceeding $99 billion in
2007. In addition, residents of the United States lead the world
in their personal generosity, sending over $48 billion in personal
remittances and giving an estimated $12 billion in private charitable
contributions in 2007. This funding is not included in total Official
Development Assistance figures.

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)

USAID’s Global Development Alliance (GDA) was created in 2001 to forge
public-private alliances that leverage the skills and resources of
non-traditional partners in development efforts. To date, USAID has
cultivated over 680 public-private partnerships with 1,700 different
organizations, leveraging over $9 billion in partner resources. These
1,700 organizations, including international and local businesses,
private foundations, non-governmental organizations, and governments,
are alliance partners in every country where USAID works. One
such partnership was the South Asia Earthquake Relief Fund, which
raised more t han $100 million in cash and in-kind contributions
for earthquake relief and reconstruction in the affected region
of Pakistan. The Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the
U.S. Export-Import Bank, and the United States Trade and Development
Agency also engage in public-private alliances, implementing programs
ranging from increasing access to potable water to providing technology
for sustainable environmental protection among the world’s poor.

The U.S. State Department’s Global Partnership Center, launched
in December 2007, supports State’s existing partnership activity
by building partnerships, providing needed guidance and practical
tools, and serving as a point of contact for outside partners’
inquiries. State’s broad-ranging public-private partnership program
supports a variety of development efforts, including programs that
combat AIDS and reinforce official humanitarian mine action.

Peace and Security Cooperation

Peace and stability are critical preconditions for development. U.S.

spending on overseas security programs helps build and promote
stability and contributes to an environment conducive to sustainable
economic growth and poverty reduction. U.S. foreign military financing
to developing countries to improve performance of police forces and
build partner capacity to contribute to international peace operations
was an estimated $2.4 billion in 2007, with another $1.42 billion
spent for UN peacekeeping activities.

All but $113 million of=2 0this funding comes in addition to the
$21.8 billion reported as Official Development Assistance disbursed in
2007. The U.S. is also working to integrate considerations of conflict,
instability, and state fragility in the new foreign assistance
framework and to implement reforms for better collaboration among
development, diplomatic, and military partners in complex humanitarian
environments.

Iran/ Armenia FMs Discuss Caucasus Developments

IRAN/ ARMENIA FMS DISCUSS CAUCASUS DEVELOPMENTS

Qatar News Agency
September 16, 2008 Tuesday 5:05 PM EST

Tehran, September 16 (QNA) – Iranian and Armenian foreign ministers
exchanged views on Tuesday on the latest developments in the Caucasus
region and reviewed ways out of the current crisis.

Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Manouchehr Mottaki said
that in his meeting with Edward Nalbandyan, the two ministers also
discussed promotion of Tehran-Yerevan relations.

In his remarks also relayed by the iranian irna news agency ,
Mottaki added that the visit to Tehran by his Armenian counterpart
was a chance to maintain Iran’s diplomacy of easing tension in the
Caucasus region and also in pursuit of Iran’s talks with the Russian,
Azeri and German officials to this end.

Referring to his visit to Germany yesterday , Mottaki said his visit to
Berlin took place in line with Tehran’s shuttle diplomacy to promote
peace and stability in the Caucasus region.

In the aftermath of Georgia war, Iran has started an initiative
by making visits to Russia and Azerbaijan to mediate peace in the
Caucasus region.

He also met with his German counterpart Frank-Walter Steinmeier,
to encourage the European countries to help solve the Caucasus crisis.

The Armenian minister, on his part, told reporters that he was
satisfied with his talks with Mottaki and wished that the current
regional crisis would be solved through peaceful negotiations.

Nalbandyan also voiced Yerevan’s support for Tehran’s detente diplomacy
stressing that Armenia would always welcome sustainable peace in the
region.

U.S. Sends Ambassador To Armenia After Two Years

U.S. SENDS AMBASSADOR TO ARMENIA AFTER TWO YEARS

The Associated Press
September 17, 2008 Wednesday 06:01 PM GMT

The U.S. has sent an ambassador to Armenia, more than two years after
the previous one had his tour of duty cut short.

The U.S. Embassy in Yerevan said Marie Yovanovitch arrived Wednesday
night to take up her new post. A career diplomat, she had previously
served as the U.S. ambassador in Kyrgyzstan.

The last ambassador was withdrawn in 2006 after he referred to
the World War I-era killings of Armenians in Turkey as genocide,
in defiance of U.S. policy.

Turkey denies the deaths constituted genocide, and the U.S. wants
to avoid damaging relations with the NATO member and important
strategic ally.

At her confirmation hearings, Yovanovitch explained U.S. policy but
would not comment on whether she believed genocide had occurred.

U.S.-Russian relations: What should be done -and not done

The Washington Times
September 14, 2008 Sunday

U.S.-Russian relations: What should be done -and not done

By Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

On Aug. 8, Russia decided to rewrite the rules of post-World War II
European security. It repudiated the Helsinki Pact of 1975, which
recognized the sanctity of borders in Europe, and violated the
sovereignty and territorial integrity of NATO aspirant Georgia, whose
troops had attacked South Ossetia the day before. In the process,
Russia also tore up its own peacekeeping mandate in South Ossetia and
Abkhazia.

Moscow desires to become a hegemonic power in the former Soviet
space. The Georgian war brought Russia back to the Southern Caucasus
in force, outflanking oil-rich Azerbaijan, and affecting control over
the principal energy and rail arteries bringing natural resources from
the Caspian Sea and Central Asia to the West and consumer and
industrial goods to the East. The Russian military practically
destroyed the Georgian military, which protected the pipelines and the
Georgian port of Poti, the important Black Sea terminal of the
East-West corridor.

The war in the Caucasus, however, surpasses the regional agenda. In
fact, Russia’s war aims are far-reaching and include:

* Expulsion of Georgian troops and termination of Georgian sovereignty
in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, something that was accomplished.

* "Regime change" by bringing down President Mikheil Saakashvili and
installing a more pro-Russian leadership in Tbilisi.

* Preventing Georgia from joining NATO and sending a strong message to
Ukraine that its insistence on NATO membership may lead to a civil
unrest in the Crimea, where many Russian citizens reside, and
potentially, to the country’s dismemberment.

* Shifting control of the Caucasus, and especially over strategic
energy pipelines and the transportation corridor from the Caspian to
the Black Sea, by controlling Georgia.

* Re-creating a 19th-century style sphere of influence in the former
Soviet Union, by the use of force if necessary.

Such anti-status quo revisionism is the stuff of which world wars are
made. Think the Balkan wars that preceded World War I or Adolf
Hitler’s invasion of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia in 1938 – with
Europe’s acquiescence.

Russia proclaims that it wants to shift the global balance of power
away from the United States; "Finlandize" Europe; revise global
economic institutions; and return to highly competitive and often
confrontational great power politics, reminiscent of the 19th
century. Realists: 1, Fukuyama: 0.

In his recent nationally televised statement, Russian President Dmitry
Medvedev announced as much. He rejected "unipolarity" – the code word
for U.S. global leadership, calling such a world "unstable and
conflict-ridden."

Mr. Medvedev declared that while Russia does not want to isolate
itself, it would defend "the life and dignity of its citizens wherever
they are," as well as its business interests. Most important, the
Russian leader declared that his country has regions of "privileged
interests," which are not limited to Russia’s borderlands. One could
include Iran, Syria, Cuba and even Venezuela in such a list.

Beyond that, Russia went into a diplomatic high gear, receiving the
support of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which includes
China and the five Central Asian states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) as members, and Iran,
Mongolia, India and Pakistan as associate members. SCO expressed
support for Russian action in Georgia but stopped short of recognizing
independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

Russia also significantly shored up the Collective Security Treaty
Organization (CSTO) of the Commonwealth of Independent
States. Comprising, besides Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, Mr. Medvedev has announced that
CSTO is going to build up its military muscle and its foreign policy
will strongly support Moscow. Russia openly announced that CSTO is
becoming a military bloc, similar to – and opposing – NATO.

The next U.S. administration and its allies need to design a
comprehensive policy countering Moscow’s bid to shift the global
balance of power away from liberal democracies and in favor of the
oil-rich Authoritarian International. China and India will be the most
important swing states in this struggle.

At this point, the U.S. and its European allies should not emphasize
military power to confront Russian revanchism. There is too much
unfinished business in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the global war
on terror. Nor are there troop and military hardware levels present
for a massive military buildup along Russia’s perimeter. Europe has no
appetite for a new confrontation with the Kremlin, while the
U.S. economy suffers from the record deficit and debt levels.

Yet, the U.S. should take a leadership role in building a global
coalition against Russian revisionist policies, expanding a strategic
dialogue with European capitals, New Delhi and Beijing. Ukrainian and
Georgian membership in NATO and the EU should be given serious
consideration. Washington should communicate to Moscow that Russia has
much to lose, including its unrestricted financial and economic ties
to the advanced market economies.

Russian state-owned energy companies – the cash cows of the Russian
budget – trade their American Depository Receipts (ADRs) in New York
and London. Russia is dependent on Western market and cutting edge
technologies both for its military buildup and for its increasingly
expensive hydrocarbon development.

Russia has also pursued policies of restricting access to its
"strategic" commodities for the West. If it continues to do so, the
U.S. and Europe can reciprocate by cutting access for Russian
state-owned companies to investment in companies vital to our national
security.

Hosting the 2014 Winter Olympics in the Black Sea resort of Sochi, 20
kilometers from the Georgian border may be a non-starter, and so may
be the membership in the Group of Eight. Finally, since the end of the
Cold War, the U.S. has neglected its capabilities to wage the war of
ideas, a key battlefield in which it defeated the Soviets. These
capabilities are also crucial to win the war against radical Islamist
ideology. In this century, the West needs to use its creativity and
technological prowess to reach the post-Soviet and Muslim audiences
despite increasing TV censorship and vitriolic anti-American
brainwashing.

History has not ended, neither did geopolitics. The next
administration has its work cut out for it from the Baltic Sea to the
Pacific.

* Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., is senior research fellow at the Heritage
Foundation and the author of 500 articles and three books, including
"Russian Imperialism and Kazakhstan: The Road to Independence."

New Russian military attache starts working in Azerbaijan

Interfax, Russia
Sept 12 2008

New Russian military attache starts working in Azerbaijan

BAKU Sept 12

Russian Ambassador to Azerbaijan Vasily Istratov has presented the new
Russian military attache in the country, Capt. 1st rank Moiseyev to
Azeri Defense Minister Safar Abiyev, the Azeri Defense Ministry said
in a statement.

The minister and the ambassador discussed the recent tensions in the
region and ways to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh problem, the statement
said.