Turkish Threats on Alberto Rosselli

>From "Il Giornale"
12th December 2008, 07:00

Rosselli’s book (Armenian Holocaust) on front pages around the world-
by Rino di Stefano

Are several days that the phone of Alberto Rosselli, author of the book
‘The Armenian Holocaust "(Edited by Solfanelli) does not stop ringing.
Following the publication of the review of his book on the newspaper "Il
Giornale -Liguria edition", half of European medias have begun to learn
more about death threats he
has received and continues to receive, only to have told how in the
early twentieth century one and a half million Christian Armenians were
murdered by Islamic
Turkish-Kurdish troops. Men, women, children and old: the entire
population of Anatolia, guilty only of being Christians in a land
surrounded by a Muslim majority, was brutally exterminated in the most
cruel ways. Rosselli, who in his work meticulously described what
happened in those years, from 2007 is under attack for alleged extremist
Turks who at any time of day or night, wherever he is, call at home and
on the mobile phone, threatening to cut his and his wife’s throat.
This "story" began to circle the world. "In these days I have been
called by BBC in London, by the French newspaper Le Figaro, by the
national editor of Sky, by Radio Vatican and by the newspaper Foglio" ,
says Rosselli . "Monday, December 8, for example, the Armenian
Television, a State broadcaster, aired a service on my case, citing your
article. All it started after the publication. For about a week I was
contacted only by few friends and acquaintances. Then, suddenly, the
news was taken up by numerous Internet websites which published the
entire review. It was a chain. Precisely in these days, Wednesday Dec.
3, the European Federation of Armenians, submitted to the European
Parliament in Brussels a report which, citing what you have written,
approached my name to that of the Turkish journalist Dogan Ozguden and
to that of Professor Ronald Monsch, they too threatened by Turkish
extremists, for speaking publicly on the Armenian genocide.I know that
the article was translated into English, Turkish and Armenian. For
example, there was a publication on the online newspaper ‘The
Italo-European’, a culture and deepening journal in Italian and English,
circulated in all European countries. In Canada was published on
"Corriere Italo-Canadian", and in the United States appeared in English
on an Armenian newspaper. Shortly, this story had a circulation that I
do not really expecting. " says Rosselli. According to Rosselli, the
Armenian Community of Rome acted giving a great interest to news edited
by "Il Giornale" newspaper and immediately released texts in all its
media channels. One of the first to bring the news was the site of Zatik
Italo-Armenian Friendship, immediately followed by Wikipedia, Thema
News, History Libera, Rarika-Root Blogspot and many others.
To remember the various publications, daily and periodical, which
somehow have reported the news everywhere, just as did the British BBC.
"Perhaps – says Rosselli – was the Saviano’s effect to start just this
interest. Although, I must say, the key is a problem of international
politics as the entry of Turkey into Europe. The European Union has put
in Ankara, as a precondition for the integration of Turkey, the
recognition of the genocide by the part of Ankara. Recognizing that, by
the way, has not yet happened. Not later than Tuesday, December 2, the
Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijten, the European People’s Party, presented the
provisional version of its 2008 report on Turkey to the Commission of
Foreign Affairs of the European Parliament. And it is a fact objectively
significant that this presentation was made too late and before a small
audience of MEPs, known for their unconditional support to Turkey, in
addition to some journalist of Anatolia. The interest, I mean, it is not
at the highest level. And they do not want to recognize the Armenian
Holocaust, doing nothing Turkey worsens its position towards Europe. "
In this regard, there is also the question of Human Rights and freedom
of expression that, while they are considered of primary importance in
Europe, not as much they are considered in Turkey. In fact, according to
EU sources, "the freedom of expression and press freedom are not always
fully protected in Turkey", partly because there are many journalists
who are persecuted for their ideas (as, indeed, Dogan Ozguden) .
Moreover, often uncomfortable Internet sites are blocked at the
discretion of the Turkish government.
The case of the Genoese writer Alberto Rosselli is to fit in this
context; he continues regularly to receive death threats. "The most
annoying are in the night – he admits – towards the two or three in the
night, the phone rings and on the other side someone tells me that he
will kill me. Sometimes, the caller does not speak a good Italian, he
has also difficulty to understand the words. It is certain that the
voices are always different. I do not know how seriously I should take
these so frequent episodes, but I have no doubts that among many foolish
there may be some dangerous extremist. And I am worried especially for
my wife. "

______________________________
Translated by Ari Armen (apologies for possible errors)

http://www.ilgiornale.it/a.pic1?ID=3D313869

Gagik Minasyan: Armenia Will Manage To Resist All The Challenges Of

GAGIK MINASYAN: ARMENIA WILL MANAGE TO RESIST ALL THE CHALLENGES OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS
Hasmik Dilanyan

"Radiolur"
10.12.2008 15:40

In the recent period the professional and non-professional circles have
been continuously referring to the world financial crisis. Armenia did
not avid it, either, although the Armenian authorities were declaring
for a long time that there was no crisis in our country. We managed
to overcome the financial crisis, but resisting the second wave,
the economic phase, was no longer possible. However, the danger
threatening Armenia is not that big.

Chairman of the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Financial-
Credit, Budgetary and Economic Affairs Gagik Minasyan told a press
conference today that Armenia is able to resist all the challenges
that came forth as a result of the crisis. Ggaik Minasyan said it
will become possible via establishment of the Pan-Armenian Bank,
construction of a new nuclear power plant, exploitation of the
Meghri-Batumi highway, as well as the reduction of shadow economy.

The shadow can be reduced at the expense of tax revenues. However,
according to Gagik Minasyan, this will not become an extra obstacle
for representatives of small and medium-sized businesses.

"Three hundred large tax payers pay 65% of our budget, while the
small and medium-syzed businesses pay 5-7%. Next year we expect 21%
rise in tax revenues. It’s obvious that=2 0we will ensure the raise
exceptionally through reducing the shadow in large businesses."

The world financial crisis affected especially the mining industry. In
the near future special programs will be implemented in Lori and
Syunik marzes, where most of the enterprises of the sphere are
concentrated. This, according to Gagik Minasyan, will enable to avoid
temporary unemployment.

Mobile Internet Center Opens In National Center Of Educational Techn

MOBILE INTERNET CENTER OPENS IN NATIONAL CENTER OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

ARMENPRESS
Dec 10, 2008

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 10, ARMENPRESS: Newly created mobile internet center
opened today in the National Center of Educational Technology. Armenian
Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan, Education and Science Minister Spartak
Seyranian, head of the World Bank "Education Quality and Relevance
Program" Juan Manuel Moreno were present at the event.

The mobile center has a classroom with computers connected to
Internet. It is intended for 6 pupils and one teacher. Director of
National Center of Educational Technology Areg Grigorian said that
the mobile center will give an opportunity to organize classes on
"Informatics" in Armenia’s remote areas which do not have enough
computers and are not connected to Internet. Training classes for
teachers on computer skills, Internet and electronic post are also
expected to be carried out.

Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan congratulated on the establishment of
the center and expressed hope that it will serve for its purpose and
pupils and teachers in provinces will get necessary knowledge.

Education and Science Minister S. Seyranian noted that the mobile
center will serve to its purpose but the wish is that the day comes
when Internet and computer be available in the most remote villages.

The experimental operation of the center will kick off in two days in
Anipemza village of Shirak province. Next year the center is expected
to visit schools of remote areas.

Armenian President To Leave For Bulgaria

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT TO LEAVE FOR BULGARIA

ARMENPRESS
Dec 9, 2008

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 9, ARMENPRESS: With the invitation of the Bulgarian
President Georgi Prvanov, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan is leaving
December 10 for Sofia on a two-day official visit. Presidential press
service told Armenpress that on the same day the official meeting
ceremony of the Armenian president and face-to-face conversation with
his Bulgarian counterpart Georgi Prvanov will take place.

The meeting will be followed by a Armenian-Bulgarian extended
negations, signing of a number of documents and press conference of
the two presidents. Presidents Serzh Sargsyan and Georgi Prvanov will
adopt a joint Declaration on the results of the visit. It is also
expected to sign a declaration on conduction of Bulgarian cultural
days in Armenia in 2009 and conduction of Armenian cultural days
in Bulgaria in 2010. The two presidents will also take part in the
opening of Armenian-Bulgarian business forum.

During the two-day official visit the Armenian president will have a
working dinner with Bulgarian Prime Minister Sergey Stanishev, will
meet with the Chairman of the People’s Assembly Georgi Pirinski and
put a wreath on the memorial to the Unknown Soldier. In the national
gallery of foreign art Serzh Sargsyan and Georgi Prvanov will be
present at the opening of the exhibition of Sergey Parajanov’s
collages. Armenian president will also visit Armenian embassy in Sofia.

BAKU: Sabir Rustamkhanly: "Improvement Of Relations Between Tirkey A

SABIR RUSTAMKHANLY: "IMPROVEMENT OF RELATIONS BETWEEN TIRKEY AND ARMENIA IS NOT A POSITIVE FACT"

Today.az
tics/49458.html
Dec 6 2008
Azerbaijan

"The principles of cooperation between Turkey and Armenia have not
been defined yet", said chairman of the Civil Solidarity Party Sabir
Rustamkhanly.

He noted that the cooperation between the two countries is maintained
on words, as no definite actions are taken in this direction.

"Naturally, we would not like any diplomatic ties to be established
at all, as this does not comply with national interests. It would
be better for Turkey to adhere to the position, it always adhered
to. In particular, Turkey will not improve ties with Armenia until
the latter withdraws its forces from the occupied lands of Azerbaijan.

This position reflects the interests of not only Azerbaijan but also
Turkey. Armenia does not recognize the territorial integrity of Turkey,
it will not reject the international recognition of the so-called
"Armenian genocide" and will not want to return the occupied lands of
Azerbaijan. Which diplomatic ties can be implied with such ambitions",
announced he.

Rustamkhanly also noted that Azerbaijan can not prevent Turkey from
improving ties with Armenia.

"Turkey is an independent state, which has its own policy. Naturally,
some of its details may seem unclear to us. Yet, considering the
current geopolitical situation, we would not like these relations to
improve. The improvement of these relations is not a positive fact",
concluded he.

http://www.today.az/news/poli

Turkish-American Relations Could Chill Come January

TURKISH-AMERICAN RELATIONS COULD CHILL COME JANUARY

Newsweek / Washington Post
/needtoknow/2008/12/turkish-american_relations_cou .html
Dec 4 2008

Perhaps the entire world has faith that Barack Obama’s historic victory
will redefine U.S. foreign policy and fix the blemished image of the
country abroad. However, there is one nation – in fact a close NATO
ally – that has reservations: Turkey.

During his visit to Columbia University in November, I got a chance
to ask the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan whether he has
concerns about Barack Obama’s close stance to the acceptance of what
Mr. Erdogan calls "the incidents of 1915" as genocide.

While congratulating Mr. Obama’s victory, Mr. Erdogan sent a critical
message to the president-elect. He reiterated his expectation from
the new administration to pay attention to Turkish sensitivities
regarding the issue, for the sake of bilateral relations.

Turkey believes that deaths resulted from inter-communal conflicts and
such events were common occurrence during World War I. Therefore, the
country strongly rejects the Armenian view, which claims that over
a million Armenians were systematically massacred by the Ottoman
Empire. Armenians commemorate the genocide every year in April,
which always proves to be a difficult month for Turkish foreign policy.

Controversy between the two neighbors is one of the most challenging
issues Turkey faces in the international arena today. Turkey shut
down its border, as well as channels of communication with Armenia
15 years ago due to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Perhaps Turkey’s worries are not in vain. In a letter to the Armenian
National Committee of America in May 2008, Mr. Obama wrote the
following: "I share your view that the United States must recognize
the events of 1915 to 1923, carried out by the Ottoman Empire, as
genocide […] We must recognize this tragic reality."

The president-elect also said, "The Bush Administration’s refusal to
do so is inexcusable, and I will continue to speak out in an effort
to move the Administration to change its position." Mr. Obama repeated
his dedication to the cause several times during his election campaign.

During his talk, I observed that Mr. Erdogan took a cautious stance
towards a possible move by the Obama administration. He reiterated
that the controversy "should be left to the historians to decide."

He expressed nonchalance at the influence of the Armenian
Diaspora on Washington, which he characterized as "cheap, political
lobbying." Mr. Erdogan added that he hoped "the new U.S. administration
would take into account Turkey’s efforts."

During his visit to the U.S. for the G-20 visit, Mr. Erdogan got
together with representatives of the president-elect’s team, and it
is yet unknown whether Turkey communicated such worries to them.

Perhaps a possibly changing paradigm of Washington-Ankara relations
is not the only challenge that will put Turkish foreign policy under
the spotlight.

Turkey, which secured a non-permanent seat at the UN Security Council
47 years after its application, will face international pressure about
the issue, say -if the question of Nagorno-Karabakh comes to the table.

When I asked the Prime Minister about whether, in such a case,
Turkey would follow the national policy or be more in line with the
United Nations’ approach to the problem, his answer revealed Turkey’s
internal dilemma in shaping its foreign policy.

On one hand, the country of 70 million people, is speeding up
its efforts to become a key player in the region by mediating
Israeli-Syrian talks and recently proposing to do so for U.S.-Iran
relations. On the other hand, Turkey’s own historico-political
narratives regarding what the Prime Minister calls "the incidents
of 1915," clash with the views of the majority of UN member states,
which casts a shadow on Turkey’s efforts to assume a peaceful mediator
role in one of the most volatile regions of the world.

Therefore, Mr. Erdogan said Turkey would "contribute to speed up
efforts for settlement of the problem," but still felt the urge to send
a message to the world community to not to "buy into the games of the
diaspora," while tackling the Armenian-Azeri problems in the region.

It is likely though, that the Security Council members would hear
the most interesting conversations about the future of the region,
if Nagorno-Karabakh takes its place on the Council’s agenda. And
those conversations would be even more intriguing, if the Obama
administration decides to shape its foreign policy in line with
Yerevan.

Whichever direction the relations evolve in the upcoming months,
it is clear that Turkey has a lot of work to do to get ready for
possible blizzards this spring, as things might not be so rosy with
Mr. Obama at the White House.

Afsin Yurdakul is currently a graduate student at Columbia University’s
School of Journalism, having previously worked as a world news reporter
and editor at Turkey’s news portal NTV-MSNBC.

http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal

"Cooperation between Armenia and Russia develops successfully"

AZG Armenian Daily #227, 06/12/2008

Armenia-Russia

"COOPERATION BETWEEN ARMENIA AND RUSSIA DEVELOPS SUCCESSIVELY"

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said that cooperation between
Armenia and Russia develops successively.

"I would like to mention with gratification that the relations between
our countries develop successively, practically in all directions",
Putin said at the meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Tigran
Sargsian.

The leader of the Russian government mentioned that big projects are
being implemented in the sphere of energy and other branches.

"We have a sheer volume of cooperation, and I am confident that your
visit will be very useful and constructive", Putin added.

Translated by L.H.

Rene Rouquet: Those Who Value Justice Should Pass The Bill Criminali

RENE ROUQUET: THOSE WHO VALUE JUSTICE SHOULD PASS THE BILL CRIMINALIZING ARMENIAN GENOCIDE DENIAL

PanARMENIAN.Net
03.12.2008 17:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Rene Rouquet, the French member of parliament and
Mayor of Alfortville, called on the Senate to pass the bill penalizing
denial of the Armenian Genocide at the hands of the Ottoman Empire
in 1915.

"This is an issue concerning not only Armenians of France but also all
who highlight justice and observation of rules. Those who eye France
as the home of human rights should vote for the bill criminalizing
the Armenian Genocide denial," he said, independent French journalist
Jean Eckian told PanARMENIAN.Net.

For his part, A lain Marleix, Secretary of State for Interior,
Overseas Territories and Local Authorities said that his country’s
position of the issue is clear. "The bill exists but the French
government believes that the past should be dealt by historian and
the parliament is not entitled to adopt bills on the issue," he said,
adding that France welcomes the dialogue between Armenia and Turkey.

The Coordination Council of the Armenian Organizations of France plans
an action in front of the Senate on December 10 to urge adoption of
the bill.

On October 12, 2006, the lower house of the French parliament adopted
the bill, which would set a one-year prison term and a fine of about
45,000 euro for anyone found guilty of denying the Armenian Genocide.

BAKU: Azerbaijani MPs Want Parliament To Hold Hearings On Settlement

AZERBAIJANI MPS WANT PARLIAMENT TO HOLD HEARINGS ON SETTLEMENT OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

Trend News Agency
Dec 2 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, 2 December/ Trend News corr I. Alizade/ Azerbaijani
MPs want the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict to be
discussed in the parliament.

"MPs do not know anything about in what stage are the talks on the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Therefore I propose and at the same time
demand to discuss the situation around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
to be discussed in the parliament," MP Igbal Agazade, chief the
opposition Umid Party, said in the parliamentary meeting on 2 December.

Presidents of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia Ilham Aliyev, Serzh
Sarkisyan and Dmitry Medvedev signed a declaration at the end of their
meeting in Mein Dorf castle near Moscow on 2 November. Presidents
of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan decided to make joint efforts to
normalize the situation in Caucasus and requested Foreign Ministers
to make efforts to solve Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The declaration calls for the solution of the conflict in line with
international legal principles. Turkey is actively involved in the
settlement of the conflict.

Agazade said the MPs must be informed of the course of talks, delay
in the settlement of the conflict and reason for absence of a progress.

He said Azerbaijani parliament last time discussed the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict in 2001.

"MPs can not get any information about the course of talks. All issues
are solved by the executive bodies as result putting a significant
body as parliament aside. Therefore this issue should be discussed
in the parliament by the end of the year," Agazade noted.

Armenia often discusses the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the
parliament, hold hearings and informs the public about the course of
talks, he added.

Gudrat Hasanguliyev, MP and chief of opposition United Popular
Front Party of Azerbaijan, backed the proposal to discuss the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the parliament. He said the public should
be informed about the talks.

Member of the opposition MP Group Panah Husein also supported the
proposal.

MP Siyavush Novruzov, deputy executive director of the governing New
Azerbaijan Party, said position of the Azerbaijani President Ilham
Aliyev towards the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is clear.

"The public has been informed about the last talks on the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Turkey’s involvement in the settlement
of the conflict and Moscow talks. However it is not expedient to
reveal details at this stage. The details can be revealed after
certain result is achieved. Therefore there is no need to discuss
the conflict in the parliament," he added.

The conflict between the two countries of the South Caucasus began in
1988 due to Armenian territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan
lost the Nagorno-Karabakh, except of Shusha and Khojali, in December
1991. In 1992-93, Armenian Armed Forces occupied Shusha, Khojali and
Nagorno-Karabakh’s seven surrounding regions. In 1994, Azerbaijan
and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement at which time the active
hostilities ended. The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (Russia,
France, and the US) are currently holding peaceful, but fruitless
negotiations.