ANCA-WR Teams Up with Elections Officials for New Vote Center Community Meetings

ANCA-WR has organized voter education community meetings

GLENDALE—The  Armenian National Committee of America – Western Region recently announced that it will be partnering with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and other Elections officials to organize a series of Community Meetings in Glendale, Pasadena, and the Crescenta Valley to give residents the opportunity to discuss potential Vote Center locations to be placed within their neighborhoods in 2020.  The new vote centers are part of the new voting model set to be launched for the March 2020 Statewide Primary Election. 

The new voting model will utilize vote centers in compliance with the California Voter’s Choice Act passed in 2016. Vote Centers will offer an 11-day voting period in convenient and accessible locations within the County and allow all voters to visit any site in the County to vote regardless of their residential address. The Vote Center Placement Project’s core mission is to identify and place accessible and convenient vote center locations throughout LA County.

In August, the ANCA-WR as well as its two local chapters ANCA-Crescenta Valley and ANCA Pasadena applied and were selected to become partners with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (RR/CC) to facilitate and host the Grassroots Community Meetings for the Vote Center Placement Project (VCPP). 

The Community Meeting in Glendale will be organized with the support and cooperation of the Glendale City Clerk’s Office Elections’ Division.  City Clerk Ardashes “Ardy” Kassakhian serves on the VSAP advisory board and has been a leading advocate for improved accessibility, modernization of elections processes and heightened election security. 


“We are excited to work with community based organizations like the ANCA-WR and  local chapters who have a track record of voter education and outreach and I highly value their involvement.” Kassakhian said.  “I’m glad that the ANC jumped at the opportunity to host these public meetings and look forward to the public’s participation.”

The details of the Community Meetings are as follows:

Thursday, December 13, 2018 
7 to 9 p.m.
H&H Jivalagian Youth Center
2242 East Foothill Boulevard
Pasadena, CA 91107

Friday, December 14, 2018
6 to 8 p.m.
Glendale Youth Center
211 West Chestnut Street
Glendale, CA 91204

Wednesday, January 9, 2019
7 to 9 p.m.
La Crescenta County Library
2809 Foothill Boulevard
La Crescenta, CA 91214

Every community meeting will provide an overview to the Voting Solutions for All Peoplevoting experience, and will allow community members to ask questions and about Vote Centers locations as well as provide input. ANCA-WR and LA County Registrar-Record/County Clerk Office staff members will be present to facilitate the Community Meeting and ensure an informative session for all members of the community.

According to the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (RR/CC) Dean C. Logan, 33 community meetings will take place across Los Angeles County. The first one was held on November 16, from 6:30PM-8:30PM at the Salvation Army in Compton. This service is being provided to facilitate information in Armenian in an effort to better serve our community and encourage civic engagement through the ANCA-WR HyeVotes initiative to make our collective voice heard in the electoral process.

Language assistance in Armenian will be provided in all of the meetings mentioned and in Spanish for the meeting in Glendale.

View the full list of community meetings with locations, hours and study areas right here.




Aram Sargsyan: The most promising candidate is the candidate who is less known

The representatives of the “Menk” (We) alliance met today with the residents of the Arabkir administrative district of Yerevan with the slogan of “You and I become We.” Aram Sargsyan, who leads the list of “Menk,” and Khachatur Kokobelyan and Anzhela Khachatryan, who are in the top three, held a campaign in Vanadzor.
The journalists asked Aram Sargsyan whether he is not worried that winning would be difficult because their rating candidates are not known. Aram Sargsyan replied: “The most promising candidate is the candidate who is less known. The time has passed for the famous ones. They are considered as one who did not keep the promises.”

Vigen Chaldranyan: I did not put Suren Shahverdyan, but appointed him

Director of  National Theater after Sos Sargsyan, Vigen Chaldranyan, appointed Suren Shahverdyan as artistic director, and he will continue to hold the position of the theater director. Meanwhile, a group of actors demand his resignation. According to them, actress Narine Grigoryan should be the artistic director, and actor Arman Navasardyan should be the director.

I’m not ‘adhered’ to the chair, I’m adhered to my dignity and my truth,” Vigen Chaldranyan told “A1+.”

“They plan to use the complicated situation ahead of the elections and to force me to resign. If you declare that this is your own theater, you must have a cadastre paper,” said the filmmaker.

To remind, Vahe Shahverdyan’s son Suren Shahverdyan has recently been fighting for the post of director of Russian dramatic theater after Stanslavski, but the director of the theater Fred Davtyan chose Karen Nersisyan. “I did not even know about that,” said Chaldranyan, “but it should not be considered that I put Suren in this place. I know Suren Shahverdyan for a long time ago. Suren Shahverdyan is a man of the theater. You do not want to work with me, I will work with Suren. Your job will be associated only with the artistic director. You will not have contact with the director,” said the filmmaker by adding that they must obey the state laws.

Time needed to understand U.S.A’s real policy in the region, argues Sarkissian

Categories
Region
World

President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian argues that processes are taking place rapidly, and one must wait in order to understand what the real US policy in the region will be in the nearest times.

The president was speaking to reporters today in response to questions about his conclusions over US National Security Advisor John Bolton’s statements made in Armenia and what kind of a situation the US sanctions on Iran will create in the region and how they will affect the Armenian-Iranian relations.

“I don’t believe that conclusions must be drawn proceeding from any given statement,” the president said. “Domestic, foreign and regional policy is a dynamic process. And, certainly, it’s not only about the Armenia-USA relations, but rather about the USA-region relations. And the regional is very large – it’s not just our neighboring states and Iran, but also USA-Europe, USA-Russia etc. I didn’t personally meet Bolton. I believe and I advise not to draw conclusions too quickly, because processes are rapid, variable, and we ought to wait, see, what the real policy of the US will be in the region in the nearest time,” Sarkissian said.

Erdogan’s Turkey remembers defiant WW1 battles, not defeat

Agence France Presse
Wednesday
Erdogan’s Turkey remembers defiant WW1 battles, not defeat

Istanbul, Oct 31 2018

World War I ended with the Ottoman Empire vanquished and facing imminent collapse, its doomed alliance with Imperial Germany costing hundreds of thousands of Ottoman lives and dealing a death blow to the already creaking empire.

But 100 years after the surrender of the Ottomans to the Allied powers at Mudros on October 30, 1918, the Great War is in no way seen as a pointless waste or even a defeat by modern Turkey under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Rather than focusing on the four years of devastating conflict that ended in the capitulation and eventual dissolution of the empire, Turkey remembers key individual battles where Ottoman forces, often against huge odds, defied the Allies and helped forge a new Turkish national identity.

Chief among them is the 1915-1916 Battle of Gallipoli, but other episodes like the siege at Kut al-Amara in modern Iraq and the Battle of Sarikamis against the Russians are also marked with increasing emphasis.

Gursel Goncu, the editor-in-chief of the monthly Turkish history magazine #tarih, said the empire’s defeat was not something that existed in the memory of contemporary Turkey.

“We, the Turks, remember and talk about that period through the Gallipoli victory and the triumph of the siege of Kut al-Amara. The devastating defeat of 1918, on the other hand, is still being interpreted as the ‘treason’ of the authorities at the time,” he told AFP.

– ‘Rising from the ashes’ –

Erdogan increasingly gives these brief triumphs prominence, tracing a line of continuity through the centuries of great events in Turkish history from the pre-Ottoman era into the modern republic right up to the defeat of an attempted coup against him in 2016.

The president sees these battles as a defiance of the West and defence of territory which was historically in Turkey’s natural sphere of influence.

The Ottoman resistance at Gallipoli prevented the conquest of Constantinople and helped lay the foundations of the modern state that would be formed in 1923 by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, a key commander at Gallipoli.

Erdogan, who refers to the battle as the Canakkale Victory, has urged Turkish soldiers to remember the heroism of their forebears as they prepare for battle.

“The aim is the same, the spirit is the same and the faith is the same,” Erdogan said in March as he sent troops on a cross-border mission into Syria to help seize the Afrin region from Syrian-Kurdish militia.

“At Canakkale, a nation filled with a history of victories awakens from a centuries-old sleep, and rising up from the ashes, embraces the spirit of unity,” he added.

There is no room in this narrative for the fate of the empire’s Armenian citizens, whose leaders and prominent intellectuals began to be rounded up in 1915 just as the Gallipoli campaign started.

Armenians contend they were the victims of the first genocide of the 20th century at the hands of Ottoman forces but Turkey rejects this, insisting far smaller numbers perished in a conflict that saw atrocities on both sides.

– ‘Defeat, agony forgotten’ –

Every January, thousands of Turks brandishing national flags brave freezing temperatures to march through snow in the northern Kars region to mark not a victory but a famous retreat of Ottoman forces in 1915 after a disastrous defeat inflicted by better-prepared Russian forces at Sarikamis.

The retreat is seen as another act of defiance, though Western historians lambast the Ottoman commander Enver Pasha for needlessly sending troops to their deaths. Enver is despised by Armenians, who see him as the instigator of the 1915 massacres.

“For the sake of a higher and more meaningful victory, our army did not give in to the enemy or to nature,” Erdogan said this year, revealing his own grandfather has been “martyred” at Sarikamis.

However the 1916 siege in Kut al-Amara was successful, ending in the surrender of thousands of British and Indian soldiers. It is regarded as one of the most humiliating Allied defeats of the war.

“We try to understand World War I through rare victories such as Gallipoli, epic tragedies or personal heroic stories, without considering the reasons for such failures,” said Tuncay Yilmazer, a WWI researcher and editor of the website Geliboluyuanlamak.com.

“We need to review our understanding of such a great event that led to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and transformation into a modern nation state,” he told AFP.

Goncu noted that WWI was part of more than a decade of devastating warfare endured by the Turks that began with the Balkan Wars of 1912 and ended with victory in the War of Independence in 1923.

“We have recalled and commemorated the victorious moments and the heroes of this 10-year long struggle, and we still do,” Goncu said.

“As regards defeat and agony, well, they are to be forgotten!”

82-year-old Ocala widower thrives on mission trips

Ocala, Florida
Oct 28 2018


82-year-old Ocala widower thrives on mission trips


By Marian Rizzo / Correspondent



Charles Aznavour’s last farewell ceremony took place in the Armenian Church of Paris

  • 06.10.2018
  •  

  • Armenia:
  •  

     

1
 114

The last farewell ceremony of the world-famous chansonnier Charles Aznavour took place in the Armenian church in the center of Paris, Saint John the Baptist Cathedral. It is known that Aznavour was baptized and married in this church.


The Catholicos of All Armenians offered an order of repose. Azatutun correspondent informs that the members of the Armenian delegation were present, including the Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and president Armen Sargsyan, Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Culture.


At the request of Aznavour’s family, the farewell ceremony was not filmed.


A large number of Armenians and French gathered near the church, they sent the remains of the legendary musician to the cemetery with applause.


Aznavour’s funeral will take place today at the family cemetery in the suburbs of Paris.

RPA has convened a session of the General Assembly under the leadership of Serzh Sargsyan. internal political issues were discussed

  • 06.10.2018
  •  

  • Armenia:
  •  

     

2
 115

On the evening of October 5, the regular session of the Executive Body of the Republican Party of Armenia was held, chaired by the party’s chairman, Serzh Sargsyan.


According to the message published on the official website of the RPA, during the session, the current internal political situation of Armenia and the problems of preserving the constitutionality in the country were discussed, as well as the implementation process of the party’s reform program.


Reference was made to the international cooperation programs of the RPA, in particular, the participation of the RPA delegation in the upcoming congress of the European People’s Party in Helsinki and the Political Forum.


The already unstable domestic political situation in Armenia became tense on October 2, after the controversial legislative changes initiated by the RPA, PAP and ARF factions were adopted in the National Assembly in an extraordinary procedure.


They significantly complicated the government’s initiative to dissolve the parliament and hold early elections, and brought the country closer to the threshold of an institutional crisis.

Azerbaijani Press: What has caused V.Putin’s visit to Azerbaijan?

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Press
 Monday
What has caused V.Putin's visit to Azerbaijan?
by ASTNA.biz
***
Of course, the interregional forum is a large-scale event. So, in the
work of the previous seventh Russian-Azerbaijani interregional forum
in Baku (November 2017), officials, representatives of parliaments and
executive bodies of the two countries, entrepreneurs from such spheres
of economy as industry, tourism, agriculture, construction, trade,
consulting, logistics, pharmaceuticals, ICT, finance, etc.,
representatives of the media. The forum was attended by approximately
600 delegates - more than 250 people from 9 subjects of the Russian
Federation and about 300 representatives of Azerbaijan. An agreement
on trade, economic, scientific, technical and cultural cooperation was
signed with 17 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and
Intergovernmental commissions were established with four constituent
entities of the Russian Federation. In general, the Republic of
Azerbaijan maintains trade and economic relations with 78 subjects of
the Russian Federation.
However, there is another reason: from September 25 to September 27,
the 3rd Azerbaijan International Defense Exhibition ADEX 2018 will be
held in Baku. This year the exhibition will bring together more than
200 companies from 32 countries. Azerbaijan, Turkey, Russia, Israel,
the Republic of Belarus, Serbia, Ukraine, Pakistan, France and other
countries will be represented at the national pavilions at the ADEX
2018. Turkey has booked a pavilion for an area of 30% more than in
2016. Among the participants are the leading companies of the defense
sector from Italy, Bulgaria, China, the Netherlands, Lithuania and
other countries.
They prefer not to talk about this event in connection with Putin's
visit. Meanwhile, it seems that this event, together with the possible
steps of the two sides that accompany it, is the main reason for the
visit.
And here our article acquires the character of certain assumptions,
possible scenarios. Thus, it is assumed that the presidents will sign
new agreements on the supply of Russian arms to Azerbaijan, and this,
taking into account the recent US sanctions against China that bought
planes in Russia, may have consequences for Baku. So why does Baku,
which still has a colossal arsenal of armaments (on January 19, 2018,
a new batch of Russian-made military equipment and ammunition arrived
in Baku), expects to continue to supply arms without fear of
Washington's reaction? It is clear that it is important for Moscow to
demonstrate to its overseas "partners" that sanctions do not cause
significant harm, at least in the leading positions (energy carriers
and armament) of Russian exports, that not only such a self-sufficient
country-giant as China, but other states ignore US sanctions. But what
about Baku itself, whose relations with Western countries evolve from
bad to worse? And here it is possible to put forward a new assumption
that, along with the agreement on the acquisition of Russian weapons,
Baku made certain proposals that strengthened Azerbaijan's
determination to take risks. There is only one problem that can move
Baku to such a step - and this is the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,
stretched for decades. It is no coincidence that a very informed
Rosbalt agency notes: "In 2018, Armenia will face the danger of a war
with Azerbaijan without the "back" of Russia."
Of course, it is too naïve to assume that Moscow promised Baku full
control over all the occupied territories, not only Russia, but all
the countries involved in the affairs of the region will never give up
their leverage over Baku, unless they receive an equivalent instrument
of influence and maintenance in return inviolability of their
interests. But after all, talks about the transfer of several regions
occupied by Armenia to Azerbaijan have been going on for a long time,
and this plan was and is included in virtually all models for the
settlement of the conflict. So why not let Baku make this plan a
reality by force of arms, then with a harsh stop by Azerbaijan's
excessive claims, as it was in April 2016? Why not repeat the scenario
used at the time of "friend" of Serge, against Nikol "suspicious in
pro-Western sentiments"? However, Azerbaijan should not be deluded,
how many times the most iridescent promises turned into elementary
speculations that could not even be appealed.
Of course, bargaining will not be limited to a large-scale, but still
local conflict. And here, for the time, one can move from assumptions
to cautious forecasts. With the beginning of a new stage of US
sanctions against Iran, the South Caucasus region again began to gain
geopolitical weight. It is the position of Azerbaijan that determines
which bridgehead the South Caucasus will become in case of the
transition of the American-Iranian clashes from the "cold" to the
"hot" phase. And Russia understands this well, as is the role of Baku
in the Syrian conflict, in which the "tripartite union" is constantly
threatened with cracking due to Turkey's "special" position. And in
this issue, Baku can become a moderator of the Russian-Turkish
dialogue. We by no means exaggerate, the policy of all the years of
independence demonstrates that Baku has a much greater influence on
Ankara than on Moscow. It is enough to recall the events connected
with the Armenian-Turkish protocols. In any case, Azerbaijan can not
only bring certain wishes of Russia to Turkey, but also within
reasonable limits to lobby them.
There is another sore point for Russia in the South Caucasus region,
in which another progress is being made - the European Union - which
Moscow, with certain reasons, sees as a downside to the progress of
the US and NATO.
The policy of promoting the European Union to the borders of the
post-Soviet space is so obvious that it cannot but cause a nervous
reaction not only from Moscow, but also from Tehran, which once again
found itself in the ring of sanctions, which, despite all objections,
was nevertheless accepted by the EU countries.
In order to achieve the goals, set by Russia and Iran, it is vitally
important to minimize the influence of the US and EU in the South
Caucasus region. It is extremely difficult to do this without
Azerbaijan. Suffice it to recall that the deterioration of Baku's
relations with the West made it possible to strengthen Russia's
influence in the region by involving Azerbaijan in new communication
projects ("North-South") and Baku's insistent proposals to reconsider
its positions with regard to the CSTO and the Eurasian Economic
Community. The three most important mechanisms of Moscow's influence
(apart from the conflict) on Baku's decisions are the numerous
Azerbaijani diaspora in Russia, ethnic minorities in Azerbaijan,
which, as events have shown, are strongly influenced by Moscow,
Russia's leading positions in Azerbaijan's imports. It's also worth
pondering over this.
It should be noted that Azerbaijan's promising foreign policy depends
to a significant extent on Turkey's positions, which are increasingly
involved in strategic relations with Russia and Iran. So, on September
23, Russia and Turkey managed to overcome the latest disagreements
around Idlib - a city and a region in the north-west of Syria, where
the last opposition forces are concentrated along with the armed
formations.
Meanwhile, at the 3rd Azerbaijan International Defense Exhibition ADEX
2018, Turkish defense companies will display their products at 40
booths, among them: modern armored vehicles, naval vessels, air
defense control systems, military equipment simulators, ballistic
defense systems, automatic land vehicles, underwater remote control
vehicles, ROKETSAN missiles, UAVs, airplanes, helicopters, etc.
After the publication of the Belarusian opposition source "Belarusian
Prauda" (based in Poland) Yuri Baranevich's material: "Deliveries of
Russian weapons to Azerbaijan cause discontent in Baku and indignation
in Armenia," which notes the low quality of Russian weapons supplied
to Azerbaijan, there was another reason to turn attention to others,
including Turkish, arms suppliers. The article notes that Russian
export contracts to other countries are either not partially
fulfilled, or are broken by the deadline for implementation, and the
quality of their implementation raises many questions. Thus, according
to Y. Baranevich: "The Azerbaijani side noted that the rockets for the
Smerch MRLS do not explode when firing, ammunition to the BTR-82A
machine guns does not reach the target at all, and the Mi-35
helicopters permanently fix thermocouple breakages that do not give
the opportunity to start the engine. As well as failures in the
operation of on-board equipment, the automatic fire and firing systems
of the Ataka-M and Sturm-B missiles do not work properly ... according
to experts, in the case of Azerbaijan, such problems may have an
intentional character that determines the need for the leadership of
Russia to balance between obtaining foreign exchange financial profits
from export contracts with Baku, which, as a rule, are signed at very
inflated prices, and restraining the latter's military potential in
the confrontation with Armenia, which paradise is formally an ally of
Moscow in the Caucasus, and is in a state of armed confrontation with
Azerbaijan. "
The article says that unlike poor Armenia, Azerbaijan is an excellent
solvent customer, that's why Russia does not want to leave this market
and give it to its Turkish competitors who could easily cover the
lion's share of Azerbaijan's requests without problems. The author
believes that at
The article says that unlike poor Armenia, Azerbaijan is an excellent
solvent customer, that's why Russia does not want to leave this market
and give it to its Turkish competitors who could easily cover the
lion's share of Azerbaijani requests without any problems. The author
believes that at the same time Baku will stop listening to Russia, and
therefore in this issue, rather Baku is turning Moscow, than vice
versa.
Despite the refutations (referring to Azerbaijani officials) in the
Russian press, it is obvious that there are complex problems with the
supply of Russian weapons to Azerbaijan. And this is another
indication that arms contracts are of a political nature. The
forthcoming visit of V. Putin to Azerbaijan can clarify this issue.